>> it is not the issue. you cannot win a marathon because of issue. >> you both raise and where the shoe improve is not the shoe. >> watch tomorrow at 5:00 a.m. and "bulls & bears" starts right now. the company the biggest loser on the dow and they were warned about problems with the 737 fax airplane but they let passengers fight anyway. hi this is "bulls & bears" and thank you for joining us. i'm david asman. joining me jonathan, christina, john and gary. will blowing holding a board meeting in san antonio of reports a pilot raise concerns about the automated flight system of the 737 and 2016. this is before the two deadly crashes that killed 246 people. dennis was stripped of his title of term in just ten days ago and

should he be out and you been following and then you also have them scheduled to testify on october 30th in front of congress to talk about the progress on the 737 max plane and we know that today this afternoon, the star got hit because european regulators said they and that the earliest they would consider putting the 737 planes back in the air will be january. nus southwest air canada that both said they remove the planes from their schedule until february. so the timeline keeps getting pushed and the company keeps getting up with negative, headlines. in staying that you had major firms that downgraded the price targets in the low 300 range, a lot of negativity right now. however, the long-term, consistent that i'm staying is

boeing and airbus, could be potential for growth if your stockholder only in the long term. >> all of this terrible news, the stock is actually still up year-to-date. the jury is still out of this, these techs and these messages look bad. fraud and deception is the fact of live but i don't think it is a way alive. way of live at boeing, might not be is cut and dry is they see it. boeing defense is that in fact told regulators about the system in question in his mcas question and they told regulators about it in fact they observed the system in operation multiple times. they are staying that this was headed and boeing his defense, is going to save win hi this is all. >> what happened is there is a technical pilot. they have come out boeing has come out and admitted there was a technical pilot who shared his misgivings about the system that they have. this automatic system that they have. he was doing it though, on one

of these simulators. it wasn't doing it flight or anything like that. they wanted to put that into the context of all of this but still investors don't think is the i'm going deal. >> let's talk some outcome here. the market cap at boeing is now down $65 billion since the if it. the southwest by the union has come out use the word fraud and that they risk lives. the word criminal is being thrown around in washington dc by a bunch of representatives. this is the big time trouble at this.and i would not, this is - i am not so sure he is going to laugh in the future because we are talking about to crash is over 300 people dead and now legal liabilities have to go up much more. i can promise you the attorneys are going to be looking at these text is a lot closer and start accusing them of lying and holding things back. >> the problem that happens gary, is how is boeing going to deal with things going forward.

that duopoly is changing because china is introducing a competitor to the boeing 737 as well. so the growth that's going to come in aviation, is going to be in china and africa. china right now pretty much owns those two markets. the only thing you have in north america, which boeing controls, is the replacement market so going forward, boeing is going to have a lot of problems with this is you might have the europeans, with their best in the chinese with a new play that is there competitor and making a lot of hay off of this. using this to push their own planes. >> john, that's a great.to think about the potential growth of the market how it's going to be marked china and africa. near term at home, two things that people are looking at is the current production rate. are there going to be any announcements about job test which would affect a lot of americans. going forward, any updates on the 737 max because we keep hearing this push timeline, which is the defecting, not only boeing and the employees there, but all of those travelers and

then the stocks of a lot of these companies is it too. we can see some negative headlines and, i'm sure the public will come out with something positive on wednesday. >> a lot of boeing companies, the make the fuselage, those god got hit today. in monday cases, even knowing. incriminating is these text see, we have very i'm going lawyers and for example, some of those participants on the talks we're drunk. they were inebriated. that will be raised at boeing is a possible defense. it's not cut and dry is it might seem. i wouldn't cut boeing out so completely. especially given the amount of jobs. >> sometimes it's not just the fact, is the feelings and right now the feeling and a lot of talk is those two crashes, did not have to happen. and that is what's coming out a lot now. and that's what i think we are staying in the stock price as well is the news that is coming

out about all of these delays in legal liabilities. this is going to be a really tough from a marketing standpoint, for boeing to get over is far is the actual what happened longevity is we move forward. >> defenses, drunk guys in front of us and didn't stimulator, what kind of defense is going to be. >> when they read the text, look if if you'd said these pilots, there was deception, boeing is going to pay the price. the shareholders have paid the price already. boeing stocks, the mark would've been up a lot more today if not for boeing is the drug. >> criminal misconduct. whenever you see the sewers together, they're in for the long haul. this it's not going to be a short-lived lawsuit. even if they settle, and is likely to go on and on and on. right christine. christine: but monday investors in an analyst, long-term is that boeing is going to come up positive. thus flames, are going to get

out there and and you have the executives, the see that they are going to get on the place the moment they hit the air. we all feel better now that the executives have said they were going to fly now. >> but we haven't seen them do that yet and that's a bold claim. christine: to have percent up for the socks. when is the opportunity to get in. it's not nice thing to see given all of the tragedies every thing but how monday loaves do we have to hit before we have to see it is a buying opportunity. >> uncertainty on wall street it's not a i'm going thing in the mean or sell there are a lot of politicians now being quoted on boeing. they are in the crosshairs of washington dc. i suspect we are going to see a bunch of hearings on capital here and i'm not so sure that's going to play out so well. you know how those questions come from those politicians. >> gary i agree with you on that. a lot of negativities company to come out. absolute dog and pony show.

trying to prove their own approval ratings. i really believe though that once this some 37 * his flying again, people will forget about this within 24 to 40 and hours. once the plane is out of there, this will all blow over. >> a lot of americans depend on boeing for jobs. if those people see their jobs are endangered by with the politicians are doing, they may back off a little bit. we'll see what happens. thank you again. using this prohibited in oregon company. massive billboard in times square showing a female marine corps veteran hog tying president trump. this attention will bring in more customers or will it backfire on the company. is more drug companies reach a last-minute deal on a landmark hope you'd settlement. what does this mean for victims. also for patients. we're going to ask fox news medical correspondence. and more siegel. he is next. >> is the long-term impact on our children. this is the health crisis.

he wanted just because of a settlement. the question is, how much is enough. foxbusiness news

>> four of america's top drug companies agree to a last-minute settlement in opioid lawsuits. live from cleveland on that. grady. grady. hi david it is a big day for settlements in fact we just got word of an even larger settlement involving the same drugmakers and distributors that we're involved in this ohio case and that with several states attorneys general work $48 billion even bigger than this ohio case. but in this ohio case, the big players who reach the deal just before a federal trial started we're tampa pharmaceutical, cardinal health and emeritus source burgan.

they're accused of fueling the opioid epidemic. this coming sale have agreed in ohio to a $260 million settlement. a large portion of the her name will be paid out to the two oh, i counties and file lawsuits almost immediately to help with the addiction treatment and education. the parties reach the agreement at the 11th hour avoiding that landmark trial. >> it's not uncommon when it comes down to the wire, people start talking more seriously when they know especially in this case, the plaintiff we're not going to budge. we want these folks held accountable. >> walgreens was also a defendant in this ohio case. that company it's not part of today's settlement. it could still go to trial with other pharmacy chains like "cbs 2" and walmart. even with all of these sentiments today, in federal judges overseeing about 2600 other cases and he has been pushing for one large settlement. is opposed to several small law suits and settlements.

those negotiations so far, have been unsuccessful. david. david: for more, let's bring in fox news medical correspondent doctor marc siegel. i'm going to see a dr.. how does this plant with the victims of the millions of patients who still need pain drugs. >> the question is of course wilbert his her name will end up being channeled in the right direction to rehab programs and one of the things that i am finding fascinating is that fema pharmaceuticals which was just mentioned is the one plaintiff here who actually is the drug manufacturer and you know what, i also make a drug called suboxone which is actually something we use to get people off of opioids. is an antidote that is called medically assisted therapy and they are actually pledging to give in the case of ohio, millions of dollars and the second settlement he is talking about, a worldwide settlement for $23 billion and a lot of it be this drug suboxone which i find very useful. >> doctor thank you for joining us it's always i'm going to see you. we in america, have they best

dodgers in the world. but we have a small minority who is no better than a street corner drug dealers that are writing prescriptions for anybody in anything. that's what we have so monday opioids out in the system right now. is we stop this preparation before it gets to the fact that they are getting it from cbs and from walgreens, and we stop people that should be getting it from getting it to begin with. >> i'm going. nobody out there has chronic pain that requires opioids but this problem happened because physicians need your prescriptions and the will was graced by the drug manufacturers which doesn't give them of the primary responsible league. is the dr. the put their pen to the restriction pad and it is still hundred and nine her name hundred and 91 million prescriptions for opioids a year. when a lot of times is the spasm or something else. desk. what is some kind of a wisdom tooth that you actually need advil for. so monday opioids. and you get more and more and more and refills, and annexing you know, there is attorney 5 percent chance of addiction.

the dodgers should be disgraced for this. luckily we are starting to see some clipping down by the dea and by the fda. anymore than actually. >> gary culp, these companies have been accused of fueling the opioid crisis. going forward, what companies do. can you define fueling or not healing, we do know the painkillers are not going away. it is a part of what is used everywhere in hospitals and clinics and dodgers you name it, how do companies define themselves going forward to make sure they are not monday losses. >> married that's a great. what we need research and we're getting it. what is the drug entries pain that does not addictive. how you affect the pain centers of the brain that went out affecting the addiction centers of the brain. that research is going on right now. number two, i want you to know that they far short recent will. we come to my office, they would invite me out to dinner and invite me out on trucks.

they would have lectured some puzzles lectured by people at the in the lecture coming see wait a minute, there's only one drug in the world that works. and that's all opioid. they would have advertising. you want to sleep through the night. take this opioid and we know all know which one that is. that is not something that is accurate medically. >> just to be clear dr., the farmer or the drug distributors there is a difference. >> the drug distributors would amp up the amount that would produce in the pharmacies would be flooded and no pharmacist would see, wait a minute because pharmacist can see to me, why are you prescribing that. what is the condition. and they do all of the time. does your patient really need the antibiotic. they were staying that about opioids. so it was a drug manufacturer in the distributors and the pharmacies. >> we see you need more research but drug company now is going to go into pain research medication knowing that they are, look we just have these companies pay

billions of dollars dollars to settle these. what drug companies are going to go into research when they become public enemy number one just by prescribing the pain medication. >> jonathan, i have never disagreed with you publicly but i want to tell you there is a huge backing because pain it's not going away and we need to treat it. it is very i'm going time for a drug company or university to be getting down to the starting blocks and staying, what can i come up with to treat pain. >> i want to ask a question that comes out of left field field here because we're getting breaking news. no ps is announcing they may get into drone delivery of drugs working with "cbs 2" and a couple of other companies. what you think think about that. >> i have mixed feelings about that. if they can ensure delivery to areas that you couldn't otherwise get the drugs to and they don't disintegrate on planning. and they can maintain safety. i'm okay with it. >> a big f. thank you very much and controversy is going in the

crosswords of the cross roads of the world over a giant antitrust ad. this one is in times square and look at this, it depicts the president of the united states hogtied in front of the white house. how the ceo behind the ad, is responding to the backlash and that is next.

♪ hey. hey. you must be steven's phone. now you can take control of your home wifi and get a notification the instant someone new joins your network... only with xfinity xfi. download the xfi app today.

>> a new 30-foot tall antitrust billboard in times square his major controversy tonight. an athletic clothing line showing a woman in the companies workout gear hug tying the president while grinding her foot in his face. the billboard is just one in a series from the company taking aim at truck. the comely city is our intended to depict the women's frustrations with the president's statements.

our intent is for our brand to stand for progressive change in the face of what we perceive to be steps backwards in the evolution of our country. now clearly the company got the attention it was looking for but will this attention backfire on the company. what you think. >> it is dumb. it reminds me very much when there was a 2007 film called death of a president. he glorified, and demonstrated bush's assassination. it is just ugly. it will backfire on them. just like you occupy or achieve it, nobody rallies around destruction or destruction fink. it really is kind of evil we do start talking about the president of the united states. it is inappropriate. the value should they should be celebrating on their ideas. not glorifying violence. it is wrong with some clothing company, is long when anyone does it. this dive boat advertisement, there have the right to do it but it is likely and i think it will backfire and anyone who demonstrates this dive boat

idea. >> on echo that. it's not right to use violence is an advertisement. to play devils advocate, like to preface that. we have to mention the fact that there was that ad that was supported by the trunk campaign and it depicting him stabbing in shooting his critics. it was obviously altered online but we can attack one and not the other. i just don't think, what have we become. where are we heading. the fact that it is just become so part of and so cruel and have this company that is staying that the world first and active best wear. and they nike, calling captain nick is a benchmark almost. they said that was an example to question four. i just think it is so disappointing that what you know staying on your screen right now is the point we have come to. we have to address all parties. >> not the question is what was this company trying to accomplish. obviously, people are talking about them, they see their sales

are up but this is what i would call in my first reaction, what a bunch of differences because this it's not a further any talk about this or conversation on what they are talking about. so goes absolutely nowhere. within a few days it's off of the pages unless they do something else stupid. and those other networks you can't stand trunk, will put them on there. but for me, it's just a bunch of nothing from a ceo who doesn't know what the heck he is doing. >> this depicts a crime scene. the company said they would not show a picture of the president but they show a curvature. so is pretty much like a political cartoon. i don't think that accuses. the christina to your., i completely agree with you. where are we headed. late 60s early 70s, citizens of america bombing each other and we had a national guard fire on students. that is the road that we are heading down because both parties, both sides, are using this inflammatory rhetoric which doesn't cite balance. we have some idiots out there

that doesn't need provocation to do something stupid. we need to back off of this. that is your right if you disagree but do it civilly please. and vice versa for the republican his. >> they said their sales are up. i'm sure they thinking about mikey. i don't know how deep their political commitment ruts on this off of they claim for impeaching the president as well. but they look at nike and nike sales are just skyhigh. they don't go down no matter how political they become. i should mention of course, the they have not had a violent twist the way this does. >> is completely different. it is completely different when you are depicting someone gagged on the floor. the president of the united states versus nike taking a stance park police brutality against black in america. it's very different. nike has also been a brand that is i'm going for something in the united states until. one of the co- creators of the brand has adjusted for capitalism at its finest. i would not make the comparison. >> at the same time the attacks on the flag are pretty

indisputable. not only from capra neck himself but from withdrawing that shoe that had the revolutionary flag on it. jonathan. >> i think there's a difference between withdrawing a shoe and a picture of a flag on it and demonstrating the president any president, i think that's the point. when everything president trump, disagree with since policies but attack him on his policies. truly if that's the best you can come up with is the mean work picture of the president being hogtied. this is the pretty weak argument. >> guess what, which we all of you on was a. we're going to be speaking with the ceo of his coming. you are going be asking him all about this. no one visit. the ceo of donnie will be here on fox does. going to put his feet to the fire. you better believe it. meanwhile biden burning through cash. giving people waiting ms. miss moran is and how shall pay.

sanders is getting big names apart. the latest developers from the 2020 campaign trail coming up. >> one of the things i do is i keep rolling out a lot of plans. i think there are really important. i have an idea and that is a two-step wealth stacked. two cents. your first $50 million free and clear, i know you feel relaxed about that, but on 50,000,001st dollar, yet attention to cents.

>> a huge weekend for 2020 hopefuls filled with rallies and reporting on fundraising and breaking down some of their big proposals. hillary one has been weighing it all out. hillary one of the big highlights this weekend. >> david joe biden is sounding the alarm after his cash on hand continues to dwindle all other 2020 democrats are doubling what he has in the bank. he wrote to backers in the fundraising e-mail staying i said, but our opponents are way ahead of us when it comes to her name in the bank. we don't pick up the pace here, we might have to make budget cuts. and biden is right, other talks center bennett bernie sanders and warren are way ahead. they have twice is much her name on hand is biden has such a way. biden has $9 million in the bank at sanders is almost four times more. 33 million on hand and warren has more than double what biden has and $25 million. in campaign cash. both warren and sanders, very

pricey proposals that they've been campaigning on a date don't need to be turning off donors or supporters. sanders got a big boost over the weekend. following an endorsement from congresswoman in alexandria ocasio-cortez. over 25000 people came out to attend and bernie is back rallying in queens new york and cortez, sanders s not been shy about how he is going to pay for things like medicare for all. staying he will raise taxes on the middle class to do it. but fellow progresses and the wind is finally getting specific. after spending the first few months on the campaign trail, dodging questions about how she will pay for their medicare for all plan. so now her campaign says she will finally release details on how exactly she is going to pay for it meanwhile, mayor who has been very critical of warren for dodging this question, says he will pay for his medicare for all wanted plan by rolling black president trump his stacked cuts returning the corporate stacked

rate to 35 percent david, so far warren has refused to see how she would raise taxes. >> hold your breath for details but we see what she says hillary thank you so much. will any of these new proposals or endorsements appealed to voters or it doesn't set stage for a new challenge. like mike blue burr. michael goodwin has suggested this in his new york post. gary what you think. gary: i know is that i spent the first hour of that debate, listening to people talk about just higher taxes on all of us more rules and regulations, more fees and more fines and more mandates. and bernie sanders gives 25000 people to listen to him. i don't even know that. he proposed an 8 percent per year stacked which means those wealthy are out of her name, that's already been stacked in just 12 and a off years. and after that there's going to be nobody left attacks of the

economy is going to be cut in half. then we really will be caracas. i am not very helpful and i the moment and invited right now, it is like peanut butter rolling downhill. [laughter] he better get his act together else. [laughter] >> is that in the jar out of the jar gary. >> in the jar still. >> i talked to a democratic it last week, this person told me they were convinced the somebody is going to get into the race. the wintel may go up but they were convinced that somebody is going to get into it. they reminded me that bill clinton got into the race dated 1992 and obviously a little help from ross perot winning that election but bill clinton did get a live. the relief is among the democrats that somebody will get in. i think mike bloomberg is one of the choices that they certainly help will get in. but i give you an alternative craziness vision off of they could be a small percentage. if this impeachment gets much worse, the president then would've met romney and nikki haley decided to run. >> what are you talking about all my god.

>> wait a minute, when a jonathan, it is right right now. if this impeachment gets worse for a republican to step in and gives the president. i give it a 45 percent she has been set not not that far-fetched. >> what is mike bloomberg mean with this clown show. it's not going to be biden either. we we're talking about that for a long time. he's lost the momentum years ago. certainly months ago on the campaign trail. he is done stuck the fork in. elizabeth warren, especially among the rest. all of them want to raise taxes on the wrist. they're basically interchangeable. pete is young and happened to be gay and he certainly cooler than elizabeth warren. he appeals to the number younger demographic. he might be the dark horse contender that surprises all of us. back in the old days, we are talking about mike b-uppercase-letter. these we're leaders way back early the day. so don't count any of these contenders like pta, mayor.

>> becoming a point. he saw the iowa numbers. pete is an elite or sorry i should see number three. bloomberg though, said he won't enter the race in the spine and steps out. then he can have all of the climate change people argue that he is spending despite what is done for after 911 and everything, mention of fleet of planes. nikki haley though, i think has been passed around is the i'm going candidate. should something go wrong. >> what bloomberg has that biden doesn't have right now. his her name. biden is running out of her name fast. >> fixing americans crumbling roads while giving our economy of this. peter morrisey has an idea to accomplish both of these way to share it with us. to win over panel. coming next. foxbusiness, news

>> spent 26 years since there was a raise in the federal gas stacked. peter murray shea, it's time to

do it again. ready not that for them raise the gas stacked to fix the rose and boost the economy. peter joins us now. peter i love you, they are asking for more taxes. for more government projects this doesn't sound like you. >> thinking that it is a reagan user the. he was all in favor of user fees. we're really not putting enough to keep our roads up we have other infrastructure needs. basic problems, is it too full. or threefold. one have it raise the gas stacked since 1993 and sorely we've had a little bit of inflation. the second is where not using all of the gas stacked or infrastructure and partners. reusing it for seating overlooks and mass transits in operating subsidies. even bicycle paths. heck i'm a bicyclist. finally, we is the her name very inefficiently. we could do better on all of those fronts. in addition, we could borrow some her name to finance some more infrastructure between the two and spent 200 billion a year instead of 50 and that would

give the economy a nice lift. >> peter, we we're promised, this is gary. we are promised by president obama on the $800 billion stimulus shovel ready infrastructure jobs we know we got shoveled. their promised infrastructure by donald trump. he is already spending $550 billion a year and we've not got a dime of the structure. this year our government is what is been $4.6 trillion with $3.6 trillion and you want us to get taxed more to give to them to do what. they have shown they have not had any ability to care about the infrastructure and no will to move forward on it. why would we want to even trust them on it going forward with our precious stacked dollars. >> [laughter] my feeling is that we give it directly to the states. and directly to the army corps of engineers. we put some strings on it.

one is we're going to give you so much her name, we're basically allocating it on the basis of current proportions. and see you have to spend the her name we give you within a year. they have lots of projects need it doing but we have to put a deadline on these things. and we have to make sure we put the her name in a lockbox so that's where it goes. i understand your problem. and i am very sympathetic. but if we stacked for the specific purpose of infrastructure and see it must be dedicated to that purpose, and give it to the state highway agencies to implement, it will get done. >> you've raped a lot of inefficiencies in the system. we know that the infrastructure across america needs to be revamped. he seemed quite optimistic about the following through and giving it to them and even with the years deadline, putting these projects in place but i'm going to ask specifically about electric cars and maybe a different avenue. there on the road, with the gun free pass because they're helping the environment. would they be off of the hook pete. >> i don't think we can do that long term. initially they off of the hook.

some.we're going to have start taxing mileage is opposed to gasoline. making all of the cars high-tech, we know how monday miles the putting on there. they're all going to have devices. might have to find some way contacting them for use of the rose. maybe, see is soon make it 25 miles to the gallon in stacked them the basis of their mileage. but of course they use the roads. >> peter, i am confused. you see the government is spending all of this her name wasting all of this her name, and in the same breath, we need to provide them with more her name and higher taxes. let me give you an alternative proposal. it's actually been trite all throughout europe and even a little bit here in those states. privatizing some of the rents presented percent of the highways in france, 56 percent of the highways in italy, even like the m6 in the uk or the chicago skyways, what happens is her name comes into the government and those who pay for the infrastructure, are the ones who use it. what about considering that is a way of addressing the infrastructure is you said, but

not making the average american, especially the little low income market through higher taxes. >> the low income american would pay through it for three tolls. is that canna sells that we would get something for nothing. [inaudible conversation] >> people don't buy gasoline to keep it in their backyard. they put it in their cars in the garment. and that's what we stacked it. the motor fuel. the thing about toll roads is that in some places, they worked out well. in texas. indiana, they have not. and for a lot of infrastructure, these privatization schemes though always work out very well. >> peter, i don't know if you convince any of us but you make a i'm going argument you know a professor and you are used to doing so. please come back and see us again print next time back in a free-market train. >> okay i will. >> before we had to our right, lessie was was going to give up on him to get it tonight. elizabeth mcdonald is with this.

>> would like to want to do trend spotting here just like you do. realizing now, five polls showing it's a really bad week for the democrats in baseman push in the polls just out the new york times, finds that voters in battleground states do not want the president to be impeached and removed from office. retracting for the polls and see the same thing. we have that story up just a second. >> will be watching. google expanding its international app. pointing out where police are located. speed traps. law enforcement is worried. they see it also is putting them in danger. retired nypd unit darren on these growing safety concerts. he is next. fox business news here, it all starts with a simple...

hello! -hi! how can i help? a data plan for everyone. everyone?

everyone. let's send to everyone! [ camera clicking ] wifi up there? -ahhh. sure, why not? how'd he get out?! a camera might figure it out. that was easy! glad i could help. at xfinity, we're here to make life simple. easy. awesome. so come ask, shop, discover at your xfinity store today.

>> google maps is expanding one of the most popular features already available to android owners. i would west users will have now have access to the speed trap reporting feature. you can know the location of police officers. might be i'm going for drivers with those in law enforcement, argue that is opening up the possible attacks from gangs and terrace. joining us now, is darren porter, a retired nypd lieutenant, former army officer. are you know you worried about this. >> somewhat so. initially to give you a quick story, was with my father the other day and is driving and using the waves app. he said the cops there and there. i sick dad just drive at the speed limit. you won't have any issues. when we look at it a more comprehensive loophole, and now miller's people, baptizing particular to where the cops are located. so we are taking an considerate ration the terrorist threat. this could really be a true issue for officers moving forward their safety. >> thank you first year your service sir. i love speeding.

i got a lot of speeding tickets. [laughter] i have deserved every one of them. i've met a live political police officers over the last 30 years. i love this app for me but i agree with you sir. i think this is the terrible idea. our police officers deliver protected. it's a bad idea for google to do this. what is the process that your hope is going through for google to change this policy. >> is publicly public outcry. what is google. google is the business. is a business, they look for people that are going to buy into whatever they are looking to sell. you have a large component of people that are purchasing the service. he goes back to, i don't think anything is going to happen it was speaking about this but the truth of the matter is at the sales are up, we are speaking to is really going to amount to hyperbole. i don't think it's going to move any further. >> waste doesn't cost anything. in fact the same people a lot of

her name. is john said, i think you, sincerely for your service but how does for example, this service on ways google maps, like a radar detector, this technology has been around for decades and decades, taller people that yeah, a revenue officer bribing a police officer is there with the speed gun trying to get me from going 75 in a 60. and take those hundred dollars of your hard earned her name. that this technology for years have we not. >> yes but to remind it take. you see you don't pay anything for google, they do though. they get it from advertising. the more people who subscribe to the google, the greater the advertising dollars they actually do make her name. >> i know they do. but we do get waves ways, even your family, you enjoy and use a benefit, you don't pay anything for that. that is of value to you. >> the more people who subscribe

to in the proponents of ways, the greater the chances for this app to stay on display in front. so goes back to your advertising budgets. but we do asked me about the radar dodgers, there are a lot of states in the country i'll give you an example virginia and even new york for a period of time where radar detectors we're illegal. so this was something that was a proven remedy to allowing people to speed. and he back to this, the part, the reason why we have officers on these turnpikes and the highways etc., is to prevent people from percent a loophole, and omnipresence for speak so they were low-speed. it's great when you are driving 80 miles per hour and you crashed into the bus with 15 kids and that's we do become a sorry statistic. soon it would have the ephod and the card it tells you the police officer and he immediately set out so almost working in a positive way. >> it does. constantly in the car however to bring it to your first.about it linking to terrorism. ways has been around for quite some time. i remember when is a teenager,

we have the illegal raters in a car is it too. have you actually seen any link with terrorism because of the fact that we have this in regards. >> the issue here is now transferring up from the waist out but people having it on their cell phone that are walking around. in day-to-day live and that is what is creating the greater press pencil the perp officer safety. everyone, not just drivers they will know where the officers are positioned. >> to panelist now have admitted to crimes on air. we hope they don't get into trouble. iq lieutenant for benoit joining us. what this airline is trying to re- define long distance travel is the test out a new record-breaking direct flights. some see they have never get on board with a nearly 20 hour flight but it would leave you plenty of time to practice your mac arena for example. we will explain after the break.

david: australia qantas airline completes first ever nonstop passenger flight from new york to sydney, it touched down sunday morning after a record nav19hours, and 16 minutes in te air. the crew was put through grueling physical tests like the macarena. christina, you are going to australia tomorrow, would you do it in one shot. >> of course, right now my travel time is 25 hours and i have to stop in l.a. they did the macarena, they gave spicy food during lunch to keep you awake, hot cocoa with your dinner to make sure you slept good. and they tested urine lefts of pilots -- levels of pilots to make sure they are alert, i

don't know why. david: layfield, i cannot imagine you on a 20 hour flight, you are a big guy you must get cramped in the long flights. >> i have flown to johannesburg many times from new york, this is over 15 hours. people act like we're going to the moon, what a pampered society we live in. it is a long flight. >> not that big a deal. >> i have continu done 13 hours. i watch godfather, and shaw shank redemption. it is uncomfortable. >> the ma mayflower took almost0 weeks to cross the atlantic. 5% of those on that ship died. david: is that much consolation to you? >> people died with this type of

transatlantic voyage, i'm not saying it is easy, pop a sleeping pill, watch a couple extra movies. david: hope this helps. >> thank you. david: that does it for bulls and bears. elizabeth: it looks like a bad week for the democrat impeachment push. it looks like the credibility is now on the line with voters. a new poll with voters, done by "new york times," shows majority of voters there oppose impeachment, they do not want president removed from office, we track 5 othe poles with same result. >> house republicans voting to punish impeachment leader adam schiff for his misleading take on president's phone call with the leader of ukraine. now nancy pelosi trying to compare democrats here to the founding fathers, but republicans are out wh