6-9 a.m. eastern for mornings with maria. set the tone every weekday. have a great rest of the weekend, everybody. thanks so much for joining us. i'll see you nex you bulls and bears starts right now. >> a tale of two cities as the beltway was focused on an impeachment inquiry today. wall street investors were focused on making more money and breaking more records. all three indices surging to new record highs with the dow hitting and surpassing 28,000 for the first time mostly powered up by renewed hopes for a trade tila china. white house officials say they are on the phase one deal and could we see a resolution before your syntax this is someone -- this is sondland and joining me jackie deangelis gary smith and jon burnett. the markets climbing to very positive news on trade.

economic adviser larry kudlow telling reporters a phase one deal is in the final stages and commerce secretary wilbur ross telling marie bartiromo whatever happens the u.s. comes out on top. listen. >> we are really in a win-win position. it will either continue or we will have an acceptable deal with china so the important thing is to make sure the deal is what we think it is, make sure it is consistent with the promises that they have made to us. david: could the sunny disposition of wall street eventually be overshadowed by the clouds of impeachment inside the beltway? >> david i do not think so. here's why. half the country is behind trump and they are not paying any attention. the other half of the country that does not like trump, 89.9% of them are not paying attention

so you have maybe 10 people who were watching, mostly inside the beltway. i hate to say it more people were tuned into the world series that are probably watching the impeachment hearings. even those people realized this is at this point objectively much ado about nothing. on the flipside of the coin let me finish please. on the flipside of the coin you have $3.5 trillion in cash sitting on the sidelines. people cannot just believe this market continues to go up. it should go down. there are so many reasons. people at one point there's going to be a melt up rather than a meltdown. people. pat: if they miss the move. david: avenue are chomping at the bit. >> thank you for balloting me. i like to hear whatever it is you have to say.

>> i agree with gary but for different reasons prefers all we should be careful with you were having fun with the numbers scary. it's more like 35 or 40 that support him and 30 or 40 absolutely can't stand them. it's an important part of the political story but i agree with you and that this is the impeachment proceedings and there have been three in modern times presidents who have done unsavory things nixon clinton and not trump but unless he gets really close to removing the president it's more like one of these terrorist events were the markets sort of go oh what's going on and then they move on quickly. this is not an economic event right now. >> it's not right now but it certainly could be and the market isn't stupid. it's looking at what happened over the last couple of days and thinks there's nothing there.

we are having open hearings so we can all hear about if there's nothing there. we learned the aid was released. there was no quid pro quo even if you don't necessarily like how the president handled it. having said that the market could be concerned there's a problem but the market hit 28,000. that's a huge record for the dow and every time you think is going to go lower it continues to defy gravity. we heard the sound bytes from wilbur ross. you don't hear company saying the characters so damaging they are missing the bottom line. the same time the market will be excited we did get the phase one deal in the tariffs one away. kind of a win-win situation here. >> absolutely. america is not tired of winning. this market keeps finding new highs but they are tired of the whining from the democrats and tired. impeachment inquiry is embossing everyone.

there's nothing there. they keep making things up. look at the market in terms of unemployment numbers, increase in drastic rise in main street salaries and we look at walmart's numbers. the tariffs are supposed to bring everything down and prices high from main street. they are going to places like walmart to spend money. >> i think we should be careful on one thing. there's a big difference and this is commenting on the markets here. there's a difference between there is nothing here and there is nothing here that will result in impeachment. i certainly would agree with the latter assessment and the markets agree as well paid to say there's nothing here, that's a political statement not a factual observation. david: we head to jackie is. we love her so much we had to occur in that live shot. back to you gary. wall street, what's happening today seems to be discounting the possibility of a liz warriner bernie sanders ever

becoming president. i can understand it's going to be an uphill battle for either one of them but do you think it's wise to completely discount that possibility? >> well i don't think so. i think what wall street is thinking i'm trying to step back and be half wall street and hath made street. they think okay, if warriner sanders winds the democratic nomination they are going to have to shift slightly more mainstream to win and probably govern that way. people say well what frame of reference do we have an that's obama. even though most everyone except our friendly comrade adam was not in favor of how obama governed you have to admit the market, not the economy so much, the market did pretty well so you ask me about wall street,

all right. we are going to get a slightly more mainstream democrat. if that happens which i don't think it will the market might not do too bad. >> gary the market during the great recession started hit rock autumn. president obama inherited the market and it went up but it went up very slowly and that's the result of a lot of the policies as well. one of the things that set the stage for president trump to get the stock market -- >> i'm not discounting president trump. i'm not discounting what president trump did that i'm saying if you are market investor new invested the first day that obama took office by the time he left office he did. darned well. i'm just saying objectively that's what the market did. >> the previous points about the candidate sanders and warren if they do in fact get the nomination what you have is new candidates emerging on the scene bloomberg and duval patrick.

>> also when you have candidates like elizabeth warren launching taxation on the wealthy in her own policy admitting that 2 million jobs will be lost gary , how is the market going to react under that administration? >> because jon the president does not make the laws. the congress, house of representatives said it makes the laws. a president can only issue presidential stuff. we always forget that. it's not just warren setting the laws. these things have to pass congress and by the way the republicans still control the senate. david: that's true to appoint gary because the deregulation's carried out by this administration, the next president if it's bernie sanders or elizabeth warren to go nap is. >> i agree with you but yes we

have those heavy regulations during obama. as i said i'm not saying the economy was perfect under obama. you asked me about wall street and i'm saying the market did okay. the market finds a way usually. it's more important with the fed does than what the president does. >> adam go ahead. >> your initial question to adam was if there was a possibility for warriner sanders presidency the market exits a low probability. that's my assessment is well a number two i think gary made a good point. if it were to happen i don't think sanders by the way would tack toward the center. i think warren would to some degree anyway. david: we have got to did there. president trump unveiling new transparency rules for hospitals and insurers but is it really going to reduce your costs? we will be asking dr. marc siegel. he is up next.

>> we celebrate something that i'm very proud of, major victory in her decision to deliver great health care to price you can afford. this will have a tremendous this will have a tremendous impact on look. only one thing's more exciting than getting a lexus... ahhhh! giving one. the lexus december to rembember sales event lease the 2020 nx 300 for $329 a month for 27 months. experience amazing at your lexus dealer. (groans) hmph... (food grunting menacingly) when the food you love doesn't love you back, stay smooth and fight heartburn fast with tums smoothies. ♪ tum tum-tum tum tums hey fred - it's medicare open enrollment.e. time to compare plans. we're fine with what we have. that's what the johnsons thought until they tried medicare's new plan finder. the johnsons?. we saved a lot on our prescription costs and got extra benefits. how 'bout it, fred.

plans change every year. use the new plan finder at medicare.gov . comparing plans really pays. look how much we can save.

i must admit. i had a few good tricks to help hide my bladder leak pad. like the old "tunic tug". you know it, right? but i don't have to, with always discreet. i couldn't believe the difference. it's less bulky. and it really protects. watch this. the super absorbent core turns liquid and odor to gel, and locks it away. so i have nothing to hide. always discreet. for bladder leaks. ♪ do you recall, not long ago ♪ we would walk on the sidewalk ♪ ♪ all around the wind blows ♪ we would only hold on to let go ♪ ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we need someone to lean on

♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we needed somebody to lean on ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ all we need is someone to lean on ♪ >> we are requiring price transparency and health care forcing companies to compete for your business. it's a very important thing we have done here but our goal is to give patients the knowledge they need about the real price of health care services to be able to check them, compare them and go to different locations so they can shop for the highest quality care at the lowest cost. david: president trump unveiling new health care transparency rules. the move will require hospitals to disclose the secret raids that negotiate with insurers for all services including drugs. this is 2020 hopefuls cory booker in bernie sanders

introducing their own bill which would create a new federal agency to control the cost of prescription drugs. which proposal is likely to work best to lower costs? "fox news" medical correspondent dr. marc siegel. who's got it right here? >> boy is that contrast night and day. my view is lower prices allows competition and you can go-to place where you pay less for the same service. i would think free-market winds here all the time and without transparency you can't have free-market. what's exciting about this is before they came up with a plan or you got to see list prices, list prices mean nothing david akin is the hospitals don't actually pay what the list prices are pretty negotiate with insurers and i want to know what hospitals and the paying insurers. where insurers. where's a secret deal and is making a profit and how much is transferred to the consumer? >> doctors say go i think this is a step in the right direction

for the presidency was this may not be perfect but we'll try to reform it in ways to help the consumer and inform people who are out there using the system. we can make small changes that would have an incremental impact >> i agree jackie and let's remember we are doing at a time of great innovation. the clunky government can come in and say you did to this drug. we need transparency that we need choice and variety. the government gets into negotiate prices away the sanders and poker are saying you could end up with one choice is a doctor and it may not be the one feels the patient. >> it's a move on their part to complement the single-payer system but getting back to what president trump is trying to do the thing is we subsidize the

world in terms of prescription drugs. transparency is the key but how is that transparency, how do you get that transparency operational? >> you brought another factor here which is foreign countries and i use germany as an example they say pfizer is some company. this is what you pay and you take it vermilion. >> bowler you don't. it's important for consumers to know what they are paying for. there is a lot of plans on the table about how that's going to work that one is secretary azar is saying we are going to love americans to pay more for drugs than foreign countries are paying. some people call that price controls and everyone's nervous about that but i agree with the basic principle. >> google is coming out with a health care platform in terms of nightingales so do you think google or a player like amazon can come into the space in the mainstream market? >> i like edi of transparency

but i'm nervous about the idea of them having access to your health records. they call it florence nightingale, right? i do want them knowing too much about me. >> if we could come back to the previous point, i'm a little confused. the transparency is a topic but it sounds like you are praising the way the germans do it and you are on the side of our government saying here's what we are going to pay you. that sounds like what volcker was proposing. >> i'm definitely not saying that i'm glad you brought that up. i don't like the way germany as bollinger drug companies but i think it leads to drug companies not being able to produce the products we need. we need an open system with transparency and choice. that's the direction we are heading into the end of the rule set a release. i think we have to put a stop to what foreign countries are doing to us. there are several ways to do that.

>> gary smith delighted to have you on the show in size. here's my question. i think transparency in prices can be transformational but my question is, i had a minor surgery about two years ago. isn't most of the cost that i am billed, the doctors time and experience is that going to be out there also like hey this is what i build per procedure, per hour or whatever and will i be able to compare that from doctor to doctor? is and that the real stumbling block? >> area and let you said that. there is part of the transparency that's being proposed today. i have to disappoint you and say we are not thinking his much of that dollars you think we are. a lot of this is bureaucratic and administrative costs. >> a former fda advisers reportedly calling an end to lasik eye surgery. how worried should people be

particularly those who have received a? >> i'm very disturbed his coming out and saying that an i'll tell you why. we are talking about procedure that i don't recommend that my patients get this but the site is five to 10% and that's the same with contact lenses. if you wear contact lenses over long time they wear down your vision. it's really no worse and a lot of people swear by it. and the fed 20 million people get lasix over the last five or 10 years, 20 million people. i'm not going to go out and tell them not to have it. we want them to have a choice. >> i wear contacts and i'm one of those people that doesn't want to be the guinea pig. my vision with contact lenses has been reduced and i've got multiple eye infections. think lasik is better and i don't want someone telling me i can't do it. >> i agree jackie and there's a

90 to 95% chance you will get the result you want and i would add it depends on who's doing it. let's let people know what the choices are for the best doctors and of course that option -- david: one of my best friends have it. it can work. a battle of billionaires michael bloomberg targeting president trump in a big way in battleground states. will voters care about this new bloomberg pr effort? more is coming up next. (vo) the flock blindly falls into formation. flying south for the winter. they never stray from their predetermined path.

but this season, a more thrilling journey is calling. defy the laws of human nature. at the season of audi sales event. beyond the routine checkups. beyond the not-so-routine cases. comcast business is helping doctors provide care in whole new ways. all working with a new generation of technologies powered by our gig-speed network. because beyond technology... there is human ingenuity. every day, comcast business is helping businesses go beyond the expected. to do the extraordinary. take your business beyond. but when i started seeing things, i didn't know what was happening... so i kept it in. he started believing things that weren't true. i knew something was wrong...

but i didn't say a word. during the course of their disease around 50% of people with parkinson's may experience hallucinations or delusions. but now, doctors are prescribing nuplazid. the only fda approved medicine... proven to significantly reduce hallucinations and delusions related to parkinson's. don't take nuplazid if you are allergic to its ingredients. nuplazid can increase the risk of death in elderly people with dementia-related psychosis and is not for treating symptoms unrelated to parkinson's disease. nuplazid can cause changes in heart rhythm and should not be taken if you have certain abnormal heart rhythms or take other drugs that are known to cause changes in heart rhythm. tell your doctor about any changes in medicines you're taking. the most common side effects are swelling of the arms and legs and confusion. we spoke up and it made all the difference. ask your parkinson's specialist about nuplazid.

david possible 2020 democrats contender michael bloomberg is the million dollar ad buy.

of course that's chump change for him. the spots begin airing in key swing states today but this makes the former new york city mayor the biggest spender in the 2020 raise even though he's not officially candidate. adam will voters care? >> sure potentially. they will care if the ads are good in their affective but if they hurt the president or help the democratic nominee no matter who it is. for all we know bloomberg has a grand design are merely taking that his word that he doesn't want to hold from to be president anymore. don't see any reason to assume $100 million of advertising won't be effective. >> i don't think you will be effective at all. i think the majority of the country is probably already made up their mind. they are either going to vote for trump or against time. i think and this is just my take , haven't seen any science on this but i think the whole effect of these ads is

overblown. it's kind of like these ads on facebook are influencing people from russia. i just don't think so. if you are the average person when your implants by this that are bad ad? i think people are imposed by what they see in public appearances and debates. but it could be 100 billion i don't think people will be influenced. >> what it says to me is 100 million is a lot to spend on ads and nobody knows who michael bloomberg is outside of new york city. one of the most recent "wall street journal" poll that i saw in 2016 the polled specifically on him the majority people didn't know much about him. he needs to get his message out and he's a little bit late in the game. when it comes billionaire to billionaire going head-to-head donald trump was out long before

he got on the podium. >> it's no surprise i completely disagree with adam. the mainstream is not going to care about bloomberg or analytica. he can spend as much money as he wants for this is a clear example of him trying to influence the voters with his own money. he doesn't even need the campaign to fund raise per he's going to spend his own money to try to influence main street against president trump and the other democratic candidates. david: i have to take issue with kerry gary because you said you don't know how much the social media ads make a difference remembered jared kushner was involved in the social media ads for the trump campaign in 2016. according to forbes anyway they said that was sentimental to him becoming president. >> the trump campaign knows exactly the value of social media. i don't believe it, i'm sorry. i don't believe it for a second.

i think the average person out to actively do this add to influence you and if they were being truthful they would say no my opinion was formed because i saw him speak at a rally etc. etc.. david: they targeted specific demos whether it's age or wealth or whatever and it was that targeting that was supposed to be successful. >> what about 2020 newcomers? he's taking a swipe at capitalism. take a listen to the sky. >> there's a place for private equity in the private economy. there's a place for business and our lives but it's also true that capitalism generally has a lot to answer for. we need to be able to confront bad and that's exactly what i've been doing at bain capitol. >> yesterday mark cuban telling "fox business" capitalism will always win. >> capitalism is going to win. there's no question about that

but i'm never against open discourse. people being able to convey their opinions. i'm not going to re-with all of them. socialism just doesn't work. david: first of all i love what he had to say. we hear duval patrick saying about capitalism bringing a billion people a poverty into the middle class and the past 30 years, that's a huge win for capitalism. countries have transition from socialism to capitalism the majority that people are always better off. >> i agree with you 100% but if i could look at duval patrick and mark cuban, mark cuban says capitalism will always win. but it isn't a w. it's not a win in the other team loses because there are losers as well and that's what patrick is saying, we have to mindful of those who are less fortunate.

>> but adam if i can read further between the lines i think what cuba is trying to say when he says capitalism must win , you know what capitalism is? it's human nature. there are always winners and losers. adam when you were in college the best that you got an an a and most of your subjects meant that other people had to get d's and c's. were winners and losers. why? you're just trying to get ahead. there will be a natural evolution. that's what capitalism is. it's sometimes the only way to get ahead in that others have to fall behind. i think that's what cuba is trying to say. >> it's a survivalist and senate. what's wrong with working hard to achieve your dreams and if other people can work that hard -- david: to quote jfk a rising tide lifts all votes. you can in a capitalist economy

have everyone gaining a little bit more. >> absolutely. when you look at america 60 to 70% of america is somewhere in the middle slightly on the left and slightly on the right him they believed in the principles that this country was founded on in terms of hard work perseverance and living out your own dream and even the people that come here through the immigration system, they believed in getting that opportunity to make their dreams come true. capitalism always winds. david: adam putnam. >> you made a lot of nice statements about mom and apple pie and chevrolet ended the capitalism. it's a lot more complicated than that. you don't like apple pie. david: is -- democrats are trying to pin witness tampering on the president. we'll ask producer chad pergram what's going on inside the beltway. beltway. that's to the outside world, you look good,

but you don't feel good. with polycythemia vera, pv, symptoms can change so slowly over time you might not notice. but new or changing symptoms can mean your pv is changing. let's change the way we see pv. you track and discuss blood counts with your doctor. but it's just as vital to discuss changing symptoms as well. take notice and take action. discuss counts and symptoms with your doctor. visit takeactionpv.com now you can, with shipsticks.com! no more lugging your clubs through the airport or risk having your clubs lost or damaged by the airlines. sending your own clubs ahead with shipsticks.com makes it fast & easy

to get to your golf destination. with just a few clicks or a phone call, we'll pick up and deliver your clubs on-time, guaranteed, for as low as $39.99. shipsticks.com saves you time and money. make it simple. make it ship sticks.

>> i mean he can't speak to what the president is trying to do but the effect is to intimidate me. >> and want to let you know ambassador that some of us here take witness intimidation very, very seriously. nobody is seen anything like it. in the history of our country there's never been a disgrace like what's going on right now.

i have the right to speak. i have freedom of speech just as other people do. david: president trump responded to critics of the very negative tweety sent out about former u.s. ambassador to ukraine marie yovanovitch. at any rate while she was right in the middle of her congressional testimony this morning some democrats suggesting the president's tweet may rise to the level of an teachable offense. that was one of the new twisted, the second day of congressional peachpit hearings that let's bring in our "fox news" senior capitol hill producer chad pergram. first of all i'm sorry they screwed up the ambassador's name. we are like lee to see the president's tweet emerge perhaps as a point of impeachment are we not? >> and see where they try to translate this into abuse of power. member with president nixon one of the three articles of impeachment prepared by the house judiciary committee dealt with abuse of power and even though that's not directly in the constitution that something they can try to lead into.

as schiff was asked about that specifically could they interpret that as a possible article of impeachment he was silent. we don't look at the president's conduct and the efforts to intimidate and hold people in isolation his term. that was interesting after the hearing there was a vote from the democratic congressman from new york is a member of the intelligence committee and she said this hearing was not about a two-week but in many respects it was. that completely hijacked the contrary the hearing and that's all the people were talking about. the closing minutes of the hearing adam schiff said the following to yovanovitch. you were at the beginning of the story, not the end of it. the beginning is important because they wanted you out of the way so they could get investigations of the bidens so that's but the democrats are coming back to but again there's a bit of that leap. what did she really know quite she testified she didn't know much about this but democrats will undoubtedly use this as

evidence to try to facilitate one article of impeachment as it pertains to abuse of power. >> this is jon burnett here but i was born in the people's republic of brooklyn and raised in queens. we all know the president comes from queens. i get him. i understand him. he's an entrepreneur. he's a businessman and when you have that type of mindset you link your name to your brand and your brand and your name means everything. anyone or any group that tries to attack the president he is going to protect and do whatever he needs to do to protect his brand and protect his name. do you think is more so that or retaliation is that democrats are claiming? >> this is where marie yovanovitch testified that there were poems at the state department the idea that the administration, they weren't

taking care of the diplomats and not supporting them overseas and that was damaging from her vantage point. president trump has his brand but whether he likes it or not the u.s. brand is his brand. that was the point that yovanovitch and the democrats are making that they were damaging the u.s. brand. she had a point in her opening remarks where she said the fact that she was -- so easily it gave evidence of a country that might want to peddle influence, this is how you do a pretty good ambassador of the way and what stands in the way of corruption and those ulterior folks is -- forces can get involved. >> last week it was obstruction of justice because alton and mulvaney weren't responding to the subpoenas in one case to show up and testify and now to abuse of power power. i think if you work in washington you should have a little bit but her skin and terms from a tree that comes from the president should we

focus on the impeachment charge in general and the crime that supposedly occurred in the first place with respect to ukraine which would be at quick provo problem and yovanovitch saying look they did get the aid. to me i don't see anything coming out of this. >> when people talk about having thick skin is one thing to undercut your own brand grade this came up multiple times, the president has the right to ask people overseas and that's the issue of how thick the skin should be. murray yovanovitch was asked the question semis if you are teaching at georgetown university in washington d.c. now and the democrat from it when i said this didn't work out too hot. everyone thought it was a hallmark movie theater really wasn't. you are sidelined from the pinnacle of curve -- your career what was going on in mogadishu somali and she was responsible

for everything you put a lot of people thought that was a bridge too far in a low blow they thought. david: chad pergram we thank you very much his eyes for being here. we have got to move on but we wish you good spent more time with us. usmca's hanging in the balance. nancy pelosi says we could see a sign in the near future but is she right? we will bring you the report coming up next with the very peyton, what are we doing here? brad, welcome to peytonville. what's this for? song inspiration. i started in my garage, but nationwide protects so much i had to expand. nationwide helps protect everything you see in here, brad. every family, every business, every dream. see mrs. hoffman? nationwide protects her home and car, but also her dream of retiring to become a yoga instructor. oh, they have backstories. of course they do. here, i got more to show you. keep up, now. a little hustle.

duda u.s. commerce secretary wilbur ross calling out democrats for delaying the ratification of usmca and the future the trade deal remains. house speaker nancy pelosi says a breakthrough on the trade deal is quote in minutes. the details on where the stance. >> we could see a ratification vote for usmca schedule by the end of the year. that's a house speaker nancy pelosi is now saying. pelosi still concerned over labor protections and some

enforcement within the usmca could still she starting to hear from some of these freshmen democrats in the swing states that went from red to blue in the last election. they are starting to say hey they'd like to see a vote scheduled on usmca for ratification. the president is also pushing for it. democrats should stop its delay tactics. >> it's sitting on nancy pelosi's desk for about three months, four months. nervous nancy she needs nervous energy to get it done pages wanted to it because she doesn't want a victory for the american people and that's all it is. either she does at her she doesn't do it that mexico wants to know what's happening. canada not wants to know what's happening to the federal reserve is watching to see if a the vote will come up to clear up some uncertainty. once that uncertainty clears the federal reserve chair said it could spark investment to go along with consumer spending is happening to the u.s. chamber of

commerce is the 12 million jobs in the united states are directly related to trade with mexico and canada. one third of all agriculture is exported to canada or mexico. mexico has ratified this agreement. canada is waiting for the u.s. to schedule a vote on it for their ratification. both of those world leaders have talked with house speaker nancy pelosi to tell her and reassure her that this is a good deal. david: edward thank you very much. he is the costly delay of the usmca just being done for politics? gary? >> i will tell you what david it's impossible, yes of course it all boils down to politics. anything that trump ftse on pelosi is going to vote an a on. that's the world we are living in but here's the thing. these trade agreements as an argument and can i manage the economy better than you can manage the economy? as the representative said i

think in the peace they said it's going to affect 12 million workers. it affects every single worker. but these trade agreements do is favor one industry versus another. for example the usmca favors the auto industry requiring a certain amount of automotive parts to be made in the u.s. and canada. that might not be the most efficient way of doing it so it favors the autoworkers of horse but who pays the higher prices? the rest of the country. it's impossible to say if this is a good deal. i'm against any of these trade deals because it's like the "wizard of oz" trying to pull strings in the background. is it going to be better or worse for the economy? impossible to tell. >> nafta itself was a landmark deal that had cat lew -- cataclysmic impacts our country alone nevermind mexico and canada the president ran on

blowing up nafta. he negotiated a new nafta and gary is right pelosi didn't want to give them the victory. think edward had it right treat she's hearing from some of her members that they want a new nafta in other words to tweak nafta and they can get this done the same way they got reform done. >> i think pelosi in a statement said its eminent because she gave the impression from president trump in the right but she's also getting it from labor. when you look at the deal 75% of all automobile components are required to be manufactured in the u.s.. 40 to 45% automobile part should be manufactured by workers burning $16 an hour by the year 2023. she's getting it from both sides and the clock is running out. she knows she has to get this done before the end of the first quarter so she's running on two parallel tracks the impeachment hearings to try to figure out

how to get this deal. david: it is costing americans billions of dollars. >> if you're an elected official who are you representing? you are representing your constituents and the country. she has a responsibility to either find a way to make this work that will appease the democrats or to push it through because right now there are farmers out there in other industries that need this. david: let's face it right now the oxygen is going into impeachment. we have got to move on more hypocrisy on the left is one member of the squad is being investigated for reportedly violating federal law. wait until you hear what's up with that, ♪ limu emu & doug hour 36 in the stakeout. as soon as the homeowners arrive, we'll inform them that liberty mutual customizes home insurance, so they'll only pay for what they need. your turn to keep watch, limu. wake me up if you see anything. [ snoring ]

[ loud squawking and siren blaring ] only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ wow! giving one. how did you guys...? >>don't ask. the lexus december to rembember sales event get 0 percent apr for 60 months on all 2019 models. experience amazing at your lexus dealer.

david: congresswoman and so-called squad member rashida tlaib in hot water for allegedly misusing campaign funds in 2018. it's a series of e-mails in the back medications between congressman tlaib and/or campaign that were released today by the house ethics committee and it paints a picture of a congressional candidate desperate for money and willing to cut legal corners in order to siphon off money from her campaign. michigan representative has denied any misuse of funds adding single moms like herself deserve childcare expenses and the salary while campaigning to overtake an incumbent. will this investigation weakened the power of the left within the democratic party or cause the squad to close ranks around congressman tlaib? >> i probably will but i have to ask the rhetorical question here why are the rules different for everybody and where's this going? why is she being investigated for this? remember rush and remember the mueller report.

they need to do a thorough investigation to somebody just saying oh we didn't do this is not good enough and if she's found to break the rules and to break the law she's in serious hot water. >> absolutely. when we look at the 2016 election and surely thereafter they investigated the trump campaign on every facet even every dollar. with the furtherance of the campaign for trump's personal benefit. if you look at all the money that was given to her from the campaign i think it's about $8000, that's a lot. to david's point it sounded like desperation and who quit their job to run for office and expects a salaried? this is insane. >> now look, with all due respect to jackie and jon you need to throttle back a little. to me it's heartbreaking.

she writes with the loss of second income to lean back on i am requesting $2000 for two weeks but not exceeding 12,000. the cost of living stipend is going towards much needed expenses due to campaign that includes car maintenance, childcare and other necessities. she is a single mom. were you please let me finish? caring for two children. it might be the most. >> in the world but to me honestly i feel for her. $2000 seriously we are going to start investigating over that? david: quickly at him. >> we always compare congresspeople to the president of the united states. i have less than nothing to say about this one david. i'm amazed they gary poynter is the victim. my friend jon is saying she didn't have to run for congress.

>> i'm not saying she's a victim david. she's requesting up pittance. car maintenance? come on. david: she is being investigated and we will see how it turns out. do you love nutella? it is opening a nutella themed pop-up hotel very soon. details on how you can actually stay there for a couple of days for free. for free. the details are coming up for free. the details are coming up ♪ do you recall, not long ago ♪ we would walk on the sidewalk ♪ ♪ all around the wind blows ♪ we would only hold on to let go ♪ ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we need someone to lean on ♪ blow a kiss into the sun ♪ we needed somebody to lean on ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ all we need is someone to lean on ♪

now you can, with shipsticks.com! no more lugging your clubs through the airport or risk having your clubs lost or damaged by the airlines. sending your own clubs ahead with shipsticks.com makes it fast & easy to get to your golf destination. with just a few clicks or a phone call, we'll pick up and deliver your clubs on-time, guaranteed, for as low as $39.99. shipsticks.com saves you time and money. make it simple. make it ship sticks. shipsticks.com saves you time and money.

i wanted more that's why i've got the power of 1 2 3 medicines with trelegy. the only fda-approved 3-in-1 copd treatment. ♪ trelegy. the power of 1-2-3. ♪ trelegy 1-2-3 trelegy. with trelegy and the power of 1 2 3, i'm breathing better. trelegy works 3 ways to open airways, keep them open and reduce inflammation for 24 hours of better breathing. trelegy won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. trelegy is not for asthma. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. do not take trelegy more than prescribed. trelegy may increase your risk of thrush, pneumonia, and osteoporosis. call your doctor if worsened breathing, chest pain, mouth or tongue swelling, problems urinating, vision changes, or eye pain occur. think your copd medicine is doing enough? maybe you should think again. ask your doctor about once-daily trelegy and the power of 1 2 3. ♪ trelegy 1-2-3 save at trelegy.com

(vo) thewith every attempt, strto free itself,pider's web. it only becomes more entangled. unaware that an exhilarating escape is just within reach. defy the laws of human nature. at the season of audi sales event. >> move over talk about. an exclusive first of its kind new tele-hotel lot is headed to napa valley, three hazelnut spread loving super fans and one of the guest each well-written round-trip airfare in new tele-themed accommodations the contestants must demonstrate in a short video how they make

their money special. they will be judged on k2 become a judgment of breakfast and passion for nutella. >> one problem when my family wins this contest, we don't need an airplane trip, we can just drive to this. this is amazing. >> this is a good one. i sit there with my mom and we can aid out of a jar with a spoon. everythinsingle person will putr name and hat. >> this is ridiculous. stick to the core. >> i'm going to be honest with you, i was talking with our producer during the commercial, i don't even know what nutella is. >> no gary. [laughter]

ask anybody under 20 bel to whether this. >> there you go, that's my point. >> all you have to know - [narrator] the following is a paid advertisement for the hoover smartwash. when your throw rugs need cleaning, you toss them in the washing machine, easy. if only you could do the same for your carpet. instead, here's what carpet cleaning looks like for many of us hauling around heavy, bulky rental machines. they're a hassle. and do you really want to bring someone else's dirt into your home? and then there's all the mixing, soaking, waiting forever for your carpet to dry. no wonder we sometimes give up and call in a pro, but that's a whole other level of pain. they're all over your house. you're left with a damp carpet and it costs a fortune. sometimes you just wanna give up. now there's an entirely new way to get your carpets looking and feeling like new again.