i was concerned when we watched those, how could you possibly pick one and then send the other one off. >> you cannot do that. it's too much. >> although it looks a little more comfortable today than he did with the killer dog yesterday. >> there you go. i like conan but i don't know about the president. that doesn't for us, i will let you finish it. >> both embarrasses up next. >> the wealth tax has been across a number of countries and france the last time and it does not work. when i was mayor i raise taxes dramatically in particular the wealthy and it turned out very well. david: 2020 democrat mike bloomberg wrapping up his second campaign event, this one in phoenix, arizona addressing elizabeth warren wealth taxes you heard. the rivals worn and bernie sanders they're down their attacks on his billionaire status, staffers at his own media company are resulting against him. quite a situation.

this is "bulls & bears", thank you for joining us, joining me on the panel, john layfield, robert wolf, carol and zachary. and we have lou dobbs coming up. 2020 hopefuls elizabeth warren and bernie sanders raging war on bloomberg's wealth as both candidates accused the 2020 newcomer of trying to buy his way into the white house. >> michael bloomberg is running for president on a bet that that people don't matter, only bags of money matter. >> i don't believe mr. bloomberg will succeed. i think at the end of the day people from this country do not want to see a billionaire bite an election. david: are voters convinced a successful wealthy american should not run for office?

>> i think that the wealth tax, although i disagree with it, i think seven out of ten people are supportive of that idea, number two, i understand what bernie and elizabeth are saying because if michael bloomberg is going to run, why not into the first four primaries, why not have grassroots. david: he does not need the money. >> i'm talking about answering the primary. >> that's what people say. you asked a question. david: the answer is most people fail when they don't run the first to win the first primaries to get more money. >> delegates when the primaries and usually if you win iowa and new hampshire and south carolina and nevada he represent the democratic party. he represented the electricity of the grassroot. he's going against the grain. obviously what 52 billion can take a chance going against the drink entering grain. this week itself elizabeth warren and bernie sanders on their poll numbers, a poll came out and you and michael bloomberg at 2%. i think a go against the party,

that does not mean he'll be able to win and we won't see a convention with this. david: wouldn't that be something. >> not really. >> can we talk about the fact this is so offensive that it borderlines on hysterical. you have people who are literally campaigning and giving everything away for free whether it's education, healthcare, ponies what ever it is, they want to give you everything for free and criticizing someone else for buying the election, at least michael bloomberg is moving his own money not the taxpayers money to buy the votes. >> this but the difference between the two, this is good politics, gives elizabeth warren and bernie sanders somebody to run against an indirect way other than the other billionaire who is clearly an office and anemic policy. it basically says just because he's got money we will dismiss anything he says on substance and that will not be able to

last long. on the point of coming in lace, deval patrick came in late and no one is up in arms about that. there's no clear process, you come in when you want if you think you can win. this is a long shot even for bloomberg. i don't think the issue should be whether or not he spending his own money, that's a political low blow. effective politics, it's not effective policy. >> i had lunch with patrick on friday, he is entering the first four primaries. >> he is going against the grain by not being in new hampshire, iowa, nevada and north carolina. we never seen this before. >> we never seen bloomberg before, this is the most liquid guy on the planet right now as far as wealth and for senator warninworn and sanders to say te grassroots movement, is going gordon door qualifies you for being president then backing him from the 1970s, that is

insane. [laughter] >> if you ask any of the top 100 executives right now who is the most qualified out of all the republicans and democrats to run a complicated global, 100% would say that's michael bloomberg, he is a game changer. i don't think the grassroots movement really matters when michael bloomberg does not need the money from early primaries. >> there's another factor that concerns his business, the union representing journalist and now demanding more from the company reverse its ban on investigate the 2020 democrats including bloomberg himself the union treaty not a long statement hours after he announced his bid calling the decision alarming an effort to silence reporters, they say specifically journalist should not be allowed but encouraged to thoroughly cover every single candidate. what do you think. >> in an ideal world i think that is correct, bloomberg would

be better off allowing his own organization to cover him as well as rest of the democratic candidates as a news organization would but the flipside, they decided the whole thing is a conflict of interest and we will not deal with her. it's a little bit different, he ran for president and said the new york times cannot cover politics, that would be a bigger deal than bloomberg not covering politics given 99% of the resources and the reason people use it as primary financial da data. david: as charlie gasparino points out, it's very important edition that they provide to their terminals, how can the news addition not report on half the people running for president. >> to the surprise of the viewers, i think it's unfair. i think if you're going to cover trump and cover his good and bad days in his fact or fiction days

and not cover the democratic side, i don't think that is fair, i think journalist should go on both sides, we will talk about this and the news every day for the next year, both sides should be cover, i think it's unfair and i hope they reverse it. >> it's a no-win situation, the reality is there's a conflict of interest and no matter what the reporters do they say you go alight on michael bloomberg and unfair to this candidate. it's a really hard decision and i liked all and nothing strategy and agree they should not cover trump at all but sitting out altogether is just as good as covering everybody altogether because of the potential conflict of interest. >> then you agree in the sense that you let the journalist from both sides -- it should not be just trump. david: were also going on the fact this is the current decision, i agree what do you say, but bloomberg and the entire news organization has never been impartial toward anybody. i think this is a mistake and i think mayor bloomberg fixes this in the next two or three months

and were he's qualified to be president with his news organization. he will reverse this or put this in a blind trust, i doubt he sells bloomberg but this will be fixed certain. david: there are important stories coming out about bloomberg, charlie gasparino is reporting that among his sources there may be a deal in the works between bloomberg and other people running in the democratic party. you support me and i'll support you and of course if bloomberg is supporting you that's a lot of money. >> that is a story we would not see reported and bloomberg. >> i'm arguing that bloomberg as a reporting function for the campaign and the election, while it's important to bloomberg i don't think it's a massive democratic issue. it's a bloomberg issue. but it's not impairing our democracy.

>> it's an important journalistic issue. president trump sounding optimistic on china trade negotiations but how close to a deal are we. we will be asking none other than lou dobbs, he is joining us right after this. stay tuned ♪ ♪ for online u.s. equity trades and etfs, plus zero minimums to open a brokerage account. with value like this, there are zero reasons to invest anywhere else. fidelity. there are zero reasons to invest anywhere else. ♪ ♪ experience the power of sanctuary at the lincoln wish list sales event. sign and drive off in a new lincoln with zero down, zero due at signing, and a complimentary first month's payment. (groans) hmph... (food grunting menacingly) when the food you love doesn't love you back, stay smooth and fight heartburn fast with tums smoothies.

♪ tum tum-tum tum tums withaetto yours aes. health and wellness with medicare advantage plans designed for the whole you body, mind and spirit. that means aetna is helping you get ready to be the best grandmother the world has ever known. with medicare advantage plans that come with monthly premiums starting at $0. plus hospital, medical and prescription drug coverage in one simple plan. and wide provider networks including doctors and hospitals you know and trust. plus a limit on your out-of-pocket medical costs. and health coaching and fitness memberships to help you age actively. so you can be ready for what matters most. aetna medicare advantage plans call today. we'll send you a $10 visa reward card with no obligation to enroll. or visit us online at aetnamedicare.com/tv.

>> i have a good relationship with president xi jinping and were in the final throes of an important deal. i guess you could say one of the most important deals in trade ever. it is going very well at the same time we want to see it go well in hong kong and i think that president xi jinping can make that happen and i know him and i know he would like to make that happen. david: president trump on china and stocks hit an all-time high today as to major trade deals seem to be moving closer to resolution, president trump sounding optimistic on china trade negotiation asthma new to in trade representative robert lighthizer held a phase one protocol when chinese vice premier -- with chinese

negotiators upbeat, a consensus has been reached, here is lou dobbs, host of lou dobbs at 7:0. david: could we see a china deal signed before years end? >> i'm told we could,. >> should we? >> is a high probability but i'm very skeptical. it has not come together and had plenty of opportunity to come together, we had to renege and may and then we saw this thing fall apart in october and then late november, i remain skeptical. david: it's an honor to have you on the show, we have had reports almost the last 20 months, every single month it seems like there is a deal imminent. and president g reneged on a deal, what has to be done for a deal to be signed because the u.s. has been negotiating with china backing out and were very far apart and becoming or entrenched in what they believe in.

>> the president has to be commenced that there will be an enforcement mechanism that is convincing and absolutely a guarantee can be. they are not there yet but every understanding that i have from every source i have heard so there is a long way to go. you mentioned those three years that the president has been in office, the chinese said that they will indeed enforce all restrictions against the theft of u.s. intellectual property, 22 times in that three year period. again that's part of the reason i remain skeptical. >> obviously this is a very critical time of year in terms of cleaning for businesses as they go into the next calendar

year. whether or not we actually get a deal signed by the end of the year, the fact that there is ongoing discussion that things are going well, at least prevent the concern that there is going to be an escalation of this war and give the businesses confidence in making the investment that they need to make for next year. >> i think that is a terrific question and i think the answer is, we have watched this negotiation take place over the course of almost a year end half, high tariffs put on we were told by the literati in the illuminati and we would see great anxiety with volatility in the market an possible to sustan growth in markets will be destabilized and here we are 100 records later, in the stock market, $11 trillion added to this market since he was elected with tariffs.

there is no doubt that the president has a great record to run-on on tariffs. i don't think that that kind of anxiety is something that we can reasonably anticipate, i don't think it would be deleterious to the advance of the market whatsoever. >> it feels like in some ways is politics first policy. the president wants to have policy if you can bring out the hammer but he loves the idea that there's no deal because it's great for his politics. the idea that he's putting china out as the bogeyman continually. it feels in some ways maybe he does not want this deal as we going to 2020. >> i can understand why you would say that but i also think there is no question that this president wants a deal and he would not negotiate in bad faith if he has reached out to pressure then she and been very accommodating, he relented on the strictures and sanctions but in the interest of goodwill in good faith, he gave them --

>> just to add you think you would sign a deal that did not put the hammer on intellectual property? >> no, i cannot even imagine that circumstance. >> to think the strength of the market and the underlying economy are not the same thing, the tears have been replaced at higher levels for five months. we are already seeing considerable economics in the fourth quarter. >> fourth-quarter gdp is going to come in at 1% - 1.5%. >> that would be an obama norm. >> obama is no longer president. >> you have this issue, it is true that terrorists had not had that they are subsidizing the farmers for their attack, but the longer this goes on they ratchet up in december and january with the economy that is in a slowing cycle, i'm not saying that the product, that

becomes a challenging prospect going into 2020. >> i'm glad to hear you're concerned about the president of political fortune. >> i'm concerned about the economy going into 2020. >> the fact of the matter is, the market is worried and the un-employment rate is across-the-board at a store close, if you are dissatisfied i don't know what to do to salve you because the fact of the matter is this economy is strong, immense prospect in this president is driving this policy on economic growth forward, deregulating in the fact that the matter is, is a very positive environment. i cannot relieve your anxiety but i tell you i feel very strongly about the prospect for this economy. >> it's not just the china trade you were looking at, were looking at usmca i.

>> house speaker pelosi apparently told a mexican trade official that he usmc compromise could be reached between think saving in the end of november. if you have a calendar close by, that only leaves two days between thanksgiving and the end of november. what is going on here? >> we now know that the window is 48 hours and pull oc has targeted for us, those two days by the way, congress is not in session. >> i think that we are going to see a lot of time expire before we get to usmca she's made it clear she does not want this president to have anything that can be construed as a win, she is playing the worst kind of cynical politics in so doing. but that is no more cynical than impeaching a president whose record is historic and offense is simply 0.

the man has done everything we could ask about president and the democrats in the radical left want to impeach and she does not want to -- point of fact ratify what would be an even larger trade deals in the u.s. china trade deal. >> let me ask you, what do democrats, if there is not a usmca i -- there have been smaller bills that have passed that have not risen to public prominence, but what condemning auntie and say this congress did this under nancy's leadership? >> lewin i agree on some things. usmca should be passed. it is good for the country, it's an innovation of nafta, i was in washington meeting with republicans and democrats recently and both sides have a few issues on labor standards and environmental standards and regulatory standards, what the

rule of law with what happens in mexico for so u.s. and so on and so forth. they should be able to rectify that. there was an up-and-down vote it would be approved. that being said, congress has put 400 bills on the senate desk that are just still sitting there, gun reform would be passed if there was an up-and-down vote. there are many things that could be approved today if the senate actually -- >> so should others. i am in support of a proceeding here. >> we cannot stay in agreement to long. >> one thing, we got close. >> lou dobbs, final word. >> i think the prospect here are excellent to 0 progress made, i do think that the democrats will come -- i think the democrats

will have to come to their senses if they are to have any chance of running competitively next year for the presidency and therefore i think there is a real chance in 2020. we will see serious business done. we will have a lot of good folks and a great time. >> is robert wolf with this. >> let me see. >> we will be talking about the exact issue and that is china and the prospects for that deal. david: lou dobbs thank you so much for being here. coming up by global tax rate could be on the way, the officials sent to me and d'este to hash it out. what it would mean for u.s. companies, that is coming next. ♪ each day our planet awakens with signs of opportunity. but with opportunity comes risk. and to manage this risk, the world turns to cme group.

we help farmers lock in future prices, banks manage interest rate changes and airlines hedge fuel costs. all so they can manage their risks and move forward. it's simply a matter of following the signs. they all lead here. cme group - how the world advances.

cme group - most people think of verizon as a reliable phone company. (woman) but to businesses, we're a reliable partner. we keep companies ready for what's next. (man) we weave security into their business. virtualize their operations. (woman) and build ai customer experiences. we also keep them ready for the next big opportunity. like 5g. almost all the fortune 500 partner with us. (woman) when it comes to digital transformation... verizon keeps business ready. ♪

that's why xfinity mobile lets you design your own data. you can share 1, 3, or 10 gigs of data between lines, mix in lines of unlimited, and switch it up at any time. all with millions of secure wifi hotspots and the best lte everywhere else. it's a different kind of wireless network, designed to save you money. switch and save up to $400 a year. and now get $250 off google pixel 4 during xfinity mobile beyond black friday. that's simple. easy. awesome. click, call or visit a store today.

david: corporate executives trying to assess the potential impact of a global tax change. they set to meet in paris discussed setting and standard tax rate for global operations. it would apply to companies with annual revenues of more than $830 million. it's kind of like liz warren wealth tax for corporations. how disruptive would this be to u.s. business. >> this is so stupid. it's an absolute cash grab and attempts to free ride off the success of u.s. companies and there's a reason why that you does not work and why we have brexit drama and countries a different politics and different objectives. you cannot have the same economic standard. this is going to be a challenge for companies that i think it'll

be a bigger challenge for consumers because at the end of the day the companies will find a way to pass in taxes an and up impacting the consumer. >> this is maddening. something needs to be done whenever a company that develops ip in the united states and shipped it to ireland and pass it through a show company in holland, it stores the money in bermuda and loans itself money back to ireland and takes it off the tax rate now they pay taxes and those who go dig it instead of paying tax in the united states where the ip was developed. this is a terrible idea. this is a cash grab, something needs to be done for the huge global companies that are finding ways around jurisdictions to not pay tax. >> i agree, the idea of setting a global stater, i don't know what the oa cd blueprint of this is will be, setting the global standard that allows government to collect revenue from companies rather than companies

to pick a taxi to which i do now, bermuda as you just alluded to, you name it. that certainly is companies basically free riding of the commons and whatever country they choose in a way that is the reason we see populist anger in the attack on capitalism. this could be more unified and more effective for multiple jurisdictions and multiple countries should really be considered and not dismissed. >> when i was in ubs we had 27 different tax jurisdictions. we had a lot of cfos. >> would you rather have something like this. >> i would prefer this but i don't see how we can ever get it done. i think to john's point, tax arbitrage happens to everyday by companies especially when the public stocks. that is continually happening. it be great if we can figure out how to put this regulatory tax environment into a more simple standard, i think that would be

the first step. >> we can make something more principal and rules-based where i can get to a more basic standard. >> at the end of the day the innovation and the jobs these companies bring all over the world far outweigh the benefit of any taxes that are collected so it's an absolute ridiculous argument that we focus on what we contact the company, let them innovate, grow, create wealth that will benefit everybody a lot more. david: that has to be the last word, the two crowded democrat field could be getting bigger. that's what fox news tucker carlton says he's making his prediction who might jump in next. the answer could shock you ♪ ♪ >> the democratic party is ripping itself apart over race, gender and class. let's be honest, one of the only people who could unite the parties.

♪ whatever monday has in store and tackle four things at once. so when her car got hit, she didn't worry. she simply filed a claim on her usaa app and said... i got this. usaa insurance is made the way kate needs it - easy. she can even pick her payment plan so it's easy on her budget and her life. usaa. what you're made of, we're made for. usaa ♪ oh, ho! oh, ho, ho, ho! you... you got me. uh, what do you want? i've got uh, ai robots, i've got vr goggles. i want your sled, please. no. [ chuckles ] timmy. it'd be a shame if this went viral. for those who never compromise.

the mercedes-benz winter event. whoa. he was pretty good this year.

hey fred - it's medicare open enrollment.e. time to compare plans. we're fine with what we have. that's what the johnsons thought until they tried medicare's new plan finder. the johnsons?. we saved a lot on our prescription costs and got extra benefits. how 'bout it, fred. plans change every year. use the new plan finder at medicare.gov . comparing plans really pays. look how much we can save.

>> if you're wondering who the democratic nominee will be don't bet against michelle obama. last week the former first lady issued a statement saying she has no interest in being president. but there are signs that that's not true. obama has not endorsed joe biden because he does not want to endorsed joe biden. why, maybe he has other plans.

david: tucker carlson making a bold prediction that michelle obama could be hopping into the race that's why former president obama has not back to candidate yet. could we see michelle doing? >> no. [laughter] she is not going to join and i know tucker wants to sell the new stories with this and i think i agree with him michelle would be a federal candidate and win. it has nothing to do with the former president of the united states is backing joe biden or anyone else he will not get involved in the primary. i think i would respectively disagree. >> i sort of agree with robert, michelle would be very, very popular but i think it would be risky for her to enter now especially with trump and how strong the economy is going but there is also such division in the party and her husband has gotten okay boomerang and i think it would be less risky for her to wait until 2024 when the

sentiment clears out and were passed this time around. >> once upon a time in a cozier time this is the way rumors were floated to see if they had any political legs but this would not be the network were michelle obama candidacy would be market. you never know. >> that is how these things sometimes emerge for the first time, this one seemed remarkably far-fetched and i would've said the same thing. >> democrats say that 69% of democrats want to vote for somebody who can be president trump so that the most important thing is defeating president trump and when you look at that and look at warren and bernie, only 80% of the country believes in socialism. so they're not good front runners. mayor pete, bloomberg, maybe but that's what you see this rumor that keeps canton resurface.

the most important thing, windows president obama stepan and endorsed somebody. that will be accumulated and when he campaigns for that poem with that will be a key moment. >> the way he is stepping in is what he said last week and last month. he said that the democratic party should not be a firing squad, we just heard ourselves. number two, he was clear we don't need a revolution in this country. that is absolutely pointing out certain people. as opposed to we need to continue to iterate, we need to continue to do good things. david: he's hinting what he does not want. >> what about a broker convention, it seems to me there is not necessarily one strong front runner and it seems there could be a situation where nobody runs away with this by the time we get to the primaries, do you see that as an option. >> i would've said prior to

deval patrick and mayor bloomberg entering the race, it would've been 10% or less. with them entering the race and feels like it could be 25%. you could see the ball make some headway in north new hampshire and south carolina and you could say mayor bloomberg make headway in california, texas and remember you need to get 50 plus one delegates when there's no front runner greater than 25% seems hard. but we know things change. >> both parties post-1972 had structure the process with a strong determination to avoid a broker convention. as you still would trump in 2016, it was good to be to cruise and others, the way in which these primaries are structured in terms of money and momentum make it incredibly difficult to have a broker convention. the probability goes up but still a small probability relative to the outcome. >> remember the college board controversy to add over city

scores in sat, the wall street journal crunched the numbers of what impacted those scores could have had. we will ask him what he found. douglas is next. ♪ rber shop. rber shop. when you shop small you help support your community - from after school programs to the arts! so become a regular, more regularly. because for every dollar you spend at a small business, an average of 67 cents stays in the community. join me and american express on small business saturday, november 30th, and see how shopping small adds up. (vo) thewith every attempt, strto free itself,pider's web. it only becomes more entangled. unaware that an exhilarating escape is just within reach.

defy the laws of human nature. at the season of audi sales event.

david: the wall street journal taking an in-depth look at the college boards abandoning controversial adversity score in which the students background put into the grading of the sat score. the whole notion of adversity scoring has been criticized as a victim index giving students extra points for being disadvantaged instead of judging students under academics alone. joining us now who investigated for the journal. good to see you. is it the college board still providing adversity score to college omissions? >> they will provide something

called a landmark in that will give them a lot of information about the schools that the kids are coming from in the text has contacts. one of the reasons we put this out today the university of california is looking at whether or not they should keep the sat and act and if they decide to get rid of it is that the president for the country. we can see a change. >> i'm one of those for beleaguerebelievers unless you'g into banking or top-tier consulting it doesn't matter where you go to school as much as how you perform. so doesn't adding some of these factor in and put those people who are disadvantaged to begin with at a bigger disadvantage because they don't have an opportunity to excel in the most competitive that they might be in. >> i would take her question back a generation. the kids at the schools with average sat so far below the

median and they don't have a shot of getting into the selective schools, that's the beginning point of what were looking at. what we found when we crunched the numbers is the bottom 10% of schools that kids are scoring 420 points or 440 points below the kids at the top of the school, a huge gap between the rich and the poor when it comes to the test. >> i want to work with at risk kids to help remediate the poverty. kids are kids. there's no difference from the brainpower of a kid of any different color but when you see sat scores and other scores, black scores are historically 177 points lower than whites, hispanics are 133 points. these are all kids under the same intelligence level but because of where they come from and there's an inherent equity from poor schooling, single-payer homes, what they've

grown up with, how do you address that as far as college going forward. so they have a chance to get into a four-year college. >> there are a couple of things, if the kids are scoring that much lower by race, this comes down to income. this comes down to educational level of parents. in the resources of the schools. those of the big blocks that are in place. that matters how you're going to do on sat. the schooling is so inequitable that you have these gaps, if you do not address that then the gaps will not go anywhere. >> it's interesting because we may be at a tipping point where universities and colleges and a few have said when equity take the sat, it will not be part of our mandatory emission packet for all the reasons you talk about. there's all these issues of who performs where, relative schooling, relative rates and we could be more at the endpoint of this regardless given where the

country is going. what is the likelihood of that in the next five years of multiple schools and systems abandoning this as a requirement? >> we are heading in that direction, there's a lot of reasons were forming that momentum. not just the test is an equitable. but there's a tremendous demographic decline in the number of kids graduating high school, colleges are scrambling to get more kids in the door if the sat is a barrier they will get rid of the sat and test optional. it's one reason the test is in trouble. sat is trying to move to put itself in better shape by creating landmarks and adversity scores. >> i'm glad you gave a shout out to teachers and being a dad my son taught in one of the tough environments for three years. i think we have to make sure that people have the resources, that word you used is key, we have to make sure the teachers have the resources and the kids have the resources so they can be educated the way they should

be in k-12 so they prepared in a different way and we have to reverse this on the head. is not about the sat scores as a much about what they're learning in school and what they're going home with for homework and i think there's a long way to go and education system. david: let me push back because of something carol said which is, there are people that come out very disadvantaged backgrounds who score extremely well because they have the parent supporting and they may come out and say i am disadvantage once i finish school because everybody thinks that i have an extra leg up that i did not really need. what do you say to those people? >> it is true. it cuts both ways, it's not an either or, what we can say for sure, the system -- with this experiment it was holding mere up to the school system and this is where we are, if you go to a poor school, poorly resourced school then you're going to d

do -- you not going to do nearly as well on an exam has tremendous impact not only to how you get in but how do you pay for it. these exams go a long way toward merit scholarships. >> the sats were started to root out prejudice and omissions because a lot of rich people used to buy their way into the colleges and now people say it is the other way. great to see you, thank you for being here. before break let's see what's coming up on evening edit with elizabeth and donna. liz: president trump is heading to a rally tonight in florida, new polls show red flags are mounting for the democrat, the impeachment hearing not changing voters minds, not sinking in, this should be a high point for the democrats, we've got the results. more into a trumped text messages surfacing from the attorney who is now facing criminal charges for doctoring fbi e-mail to get a fisa warrant to spy on the trump campaign. listen to the text that we found

around the time of the election, i have initiated the destruction of the republic and he said, the crazies have one, we have to fight this again. we will have that debate tonight. david: we will be watching. alexandria because seo cortez are fighting against the critics say she's promising people free stuff. what she considers public goods, kentucky. more after this. as a struggling actor, i need all the breaks that i can get. at liberty butchumal- cut. liberty biberty- cut. we'll dub it. liberty mutual customizes your car insurance so you only pay for what you need. only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty. ♪ (groans) hmph... (food grunting menacingly) when the food you love doesn't love you back, stay smooth and fight heartburn fast with tums smoothies. ♪ tum tum-tum tum tums step up, please. empty your pockets. looks like you're all set for that business trip. you've got your smartphone, laptop,

your other smartphone... woman: is this all the devices you have? your tablet... seriously? smartwatch, your backup tablet, and... woman: anything else in your bag? ...whatever that is. (beeping) this isn't working. introducing samsung mobile workspace solutions. with the galaxy note10 with dex software, you can run your entire business on the one device that does it all. samsung business solutions.

n[inaudible] [applause] [inaudible] >> freshman congresswoman firing

back at critics suggesting her proposals tuition free college, universal healthcare are public goods. they say they should be easy assessed and used like a rose in public library. but does calling giveaway for public goods make them any more affordable? >> i would probably rephrase that, it's good for the public if we have good healthcare and good roads and bridges. i would probably said it differently. i think healthcare is right. i think every american should have quality healthcare. >> universal income? >> with respect to education, i am different than her on that. pre-k we should institute and we should look at college affordability but i don't think that everyone should have free education. david: she's also a fan of universal income where you get paid for doing nothing. is that a public right? >> it would be great if we could

get that. [laughter] i don't think it's a public right. i'm not sure about healthcare, i don't think college education, it would be great if we had free college education and free trade school but we cannot afford it right now and the aoc has an ideology that thinks about similar to a streetlight in front of her house that should be part of what your taxes go to, we cannot afford it right now, it would be great if we could have ever congress has gone in so much debt a lot of things we cannot do. >> on the universal edge income idea if you can have that eliminating to bureaucracy is more compelling discussion than not the discussion having right now. the only problem the healthcare and education, in many ways they are, it does not obviate the fact that they have to be paid for which is a stop in front of your house. there is the rub, these things

are not provided, teachers do not work for free, you still have two finance these needs. >> imagine telling somebody who decided not to go to college and going to trade, they have to pay for somebody else's education because that is a public good. at the end of the day freedom of choice or force of control and we just had an entire segment of how the education system in this country is failing despite the fact that we have technology where they can stream the same classroom instruction at the same time all over the place. until we can figure that out it's not even a discussion. >> until we can graduate from high school people who can read and do arithmetic, that's a more important goal then universal college and education. >> i said pre-k to 12th i would respectfully disagree, we should make sure that that education is forced upon.

>> what part did you disagree with, the freedom and choice and forth and control. >> with respect to kids getting education should be mandatory. >> do they have a responsibility, do we need to pick where they go into. david: they are not learning at all with the current education system so we should fix that first. we have to move on former papa john's ceo telling his side of the story since being ousted from the company. it's what he said about his pizza consumption raising eyebrows. details coming up next. ♪ this is the epson ecotank color printer. no more buying cartridges. big ink tanks. lots of ink. print about... this many pages. the epson ecotank. just fill and chill.

most people think of verizon as a reliable phone company. (woman) but to businesses, we're a reliable partner. we keep companies ready for what's next. (man) we weave security into their business. virtualize their operations. (woman) and build ai customer experiences.

we also keep them ready for the next big opportunity. like 5g. almost all the fortune 500 partner with us. (woman) when it comes to digital transformation... verizon keeps business ready. ♪ you'rethat's why at aetna,sing what matters. we're committed to taking care of the whole you. with medicare advantage plans that offer health coaching and fitness memberships. plus hospital, medical and prescription drug coverage in one simple plan. with monthly plan premiums starting at $0. aetna medicare advantage plans call today to learn more and we'll send you a $10 visa reward card with no obligation to enroll. medicare annual enrollment ends december 7th.

thlook at all this ink no more bit comes with.es. big ink tanks. lots of ink. no more cartridges. incredible amount of ink. the epson ecotank. just fill and chill. former papa john's ceo blasting the peter shane that he founded in a shocking new interview. i have had over 40 pizzas in the last 30 days and it's not the same pizza, not the same product. he also is warning a day of reckoning calling for two kurd word members to be jailed you

may remember he resigned as papa john's chairman after admitting to using a racial slur in a company conference call earlier that year. there's a lot to digest what i want to go to the chase act, can you eat 40 pizzas in 30 days? >> that's a lot to digest. it's one of the thing, he built a great company and a founder and ceo and i have great respect for that but it's really time for him to move on, the company has gone past him, he has gone past the company and there is no way on. this looks like sour grapes and if you puts our grapes on a pizza -- >> 40 pizzas? >> i play professional football and professional wrestling, i know a lot of big fat people that can really eat and i don't know if anybody can eat 40 pizzas in 30 days. i will not call him a liar but i say we give that man a trophy.

>> i would agree he should not do the beta test for papa john's. >> i know a lot of emotional eaters myself included, he did not say he ate the entire pizza but there have been months where 40 pizzas i could certainly take that. david: that does it for "bulls & bears". we will see you next ♪ ♪. liz: president trump heading to raleigh hours after democrats on house judiciary are going to take over the impeachment probe next wednesday. the whit white invited the cross examiner. new polls show red flags are mounted for presidents. democrats not able to move public sentiment at all. even after five hearings. this should be a high point right now for democrats in making their case to voters but not sinking in. we have the latest results. the reality check may be coming for the moderate democrats heading home to the district for thanksgiving. the debate on how mitch mcconnell cou