but you love it so i'm excited about it for you. >> i play soccer, too, as you know. i'm a big soccer fan but let the record show. have a great weekend. >> absolutely. the markets down 27 points on this friday. here's bulls and bears. >> we are less than 24 hours away from nevada democratic caucuses as a 2020 presidential candidates make their final push to sway voters in their direction. with new report out now that some are strapped for cash, which 2020 hopefuls are going to capitalize the most with voters tomorrow? we brought you the numbers and have a report live from las vegas. this is bulls and bears, i'm david. joining me today, john, susan, john and zachary. we got a busy show for you. who will cash in big with voters tomorrow? hillary is tracking the numbers in las vegas for us. hillary.

>> president trump campaign is dominating democrats when it comes to fundraising in just one week during his california trip, a whopping $14 million to kickoff 2020 campaign. a record january. raising $60 million. trump has almost $92 million in the bank, almost three times more cash in all 2020 democrats have combined. senator bernie sanders has the most of the dems running for president, $16.8 million in cash, joe biden has 7 million, mayor pete 6 million and while senator amy klobuchar and elizabeth warren have around $2 million in cash on hand. many problems are plaguing some candidates in the field because it hasn't narrowed much in the primary dragging on. the campaign for elizabeth warren took out a loan. pete to judge $13 million. their up against billionaire michael bloomberg sent over $150

million on super tuesday but biden and buttigieg spent $0 on super tuesday. >> thank you very much. andrew cuomo giving mike bloomberg some advice, suggesting the former new york city mayor should break out another hundred million dollars after is universally panned debate performance this week. anymore spending five bloomberg make him a more effective candidate? what you think? >> i hope he spends a little bit better. from what i see, still at $55 million in the bank. they've outraised a lot of people. $60 million in the bank and when it comes to money as you know, many counts in the election. hopefully it's better for his preparation next time. i think that's a pretty strong advanced still for bloomberg. >> we all pay attention, they use them as a barometer. there's a lot of evidence that

voters in general don't behave that way. they do not vote based on debate performance. that's not to say that bloomberg's performance was strong or that will help them, it simply says that's a very polite way of saying a similar thing but it is clear that voters can devote their issues and will also overlook debates entirely because they are spectacle. it's probably a good idea not to vote for somebody to see how they perform in debate or dislike. >> it was the best biden impersonation of arsene. there's a complete debacle, he looked confused. he jumped all over. he should have been participating to be prepared for stop and frisk. the winners in the bloomberg campaign on the consultants. he will have to spend more money. he didn't convince anyone that he is the best choice.

>> mike bloomberg is a great example, there should be no limit on campaigns funding and financing from 20,300,000,000, voters are not idiots. they can't be bought. they can't be swayed. not just authenticity but morality. mike bloomberg has the idea that i'm a good manager, very practical. people vote with they think is morally right. that's why bernie is number has gone up. >> at least likable. if there's one thing i would have to point to is like about it. i don't know -- he's already spent what $309? do not. he could spend another $400 million. >> 60 billion in the bank. doesn't make him more likable, probably more elitist given that

he so much richer than everybody else and he didn't really like the crowd at all. >> i don't think the likability factor is significant. it certainly wasn't significant for richard nixon or jimmy carter and it sure wasn't significant for donald trump. >> new hampshire saw klobuchar move up. >> i think likability is an overrated virtue. >> coming into this debate bloomberg tried to buy out other candidates. if you're trying to buy out other candidates, you have to come and strong. he came in week. that's not any confidence. >> he said he presented himself as a donald trump but he doesn't have a vision, a clear vision of what the country under a bloomberg presidency would be. sanders is a lunatic version. it's a communist vision. but it is a vision a lot of

democrats subscribe to. mike bloomberg can't answer that. >> let's talk about what you call lunatic version sanders because he's been on 60 minutes. bloomberg is skipping nevada caucasus. that did not stop bernie from slamming him when he was asked about the former players debate performance on 60 minutes. listen. >> were you surprised by how unprepared he seemed for basic obvious questions out a debate? >> i was. if that's what happened in a democratic debate, i think it's quite likely trump will show him up and chew them up and spit them out. >> this is probably one of the few times i would agree with bernie sanders. what you think? >> the thing is, he didn't provide anything. he actually gave more material to president trump and that's the last person you want to give material to. the thing is, he couldn't answer questions, he didn't share his vision. i look forward to the next debate, why?

they are going to do the same thing. if he's not prepared, if he doesn't show strength, biden outperforms bloomberg, he's wasting his money. >> it makes me wonder why he accepted the invitation if he only had two days prepare. in the nevada caucus anyway, why bother? why not wait until you are prepared and actually ready to do battle? >> even though we disagree on the likability issue, this does prove them money cannot buy everything. >> he was never an astute public speaker. never arousing figure. he doesn't come off well in these venues as expectation that he suddenly going to become a complete person by tuesday. i think it's far-fetched. no amount of coaching will make a 78-year-old multibillionaire into an easy debater. >> there is another 70 something

billionaire who's running for president, thus the current president himself. we've got to say, right now is above water, just for the first time in his presidency, for president more people like him and disapprove of him. the more exposure the democrats have into medicine the party right now, the more people like donald trump. >> they are galvanized around the president, the record number on "wall street" and the economy and the democratic party, it's in disarray right now. the part for me in that debate was when mike bloomberg was asked, should you be a billionaire? he said i earned it. you think our republican debate, paraphrasing about. >> booze. >> they are making the decision.

>> the people differ very much from the majority of americans. 67% of whom say they don't want a socialist for president. 67%. this is why i think donald trump doesn't want to face off with bernie more than anyone else. >> absolutely. when you look at the polls, bernie doubling the next person in second place. to blink their assets. the audience frowned upon bloomberg, why? is the democratic talking points on the far left. they are going to attack bloomberg. anything in his wealth and success is going to be the line. 33% apparently do want a socialist for president. that in itself strikes is an extraordinarily high figure. >> jonathan, i think he does bring up a good. trump might want to socialist running from is not necessarily the thing for america, one third of the country is not okay with a socialist.

>> there's no correlation between president trump party in the state of the economy for there's a strong correlation between the socialist ideas are enacted in the economy that destroyed the economy. if bernie starts taking the lead here, perhaps wins even in terms of democratic nomination, by the door when it comes to that. >> what happened to the socialist over in the uk, he was finally really thrown out there, they are rethinking liberals in their own apology toward socialist. tuning special coverage of the nevada caucasus tomorrow on kudo live 10:00 a.m. eastern time on fox news channel. coming up, president trump is how the writing the success of the u.s. economy as he hit record job high approval. we will ask eugene scalia to weigh in on the numbers. that's next. >> we are at an all-time high with the stock market. the military is re- billed.

regulation cuts, all of it.

we added another 225,000 new jobs last month alone. way above anticipated. [cheering] that makes 7 million new jobs since the election. >> president trump touting the street, poll showing his all-time high. new polls showing 49% of americans approving the job president trump is doing. 63% feel the economy is excellent or good. let's bring in eugene scalia.

good to see you again. thanks for joining us. the overall numbers, the reasons i think americans feel good about the economy is the overall numbers are very impressive. human democrats have to admit that. 6.55 million jobs added. i think three years ago, cbo was suggesting only 2 million. s&p up 49%. gdp growth to have%. the numbers are great but i'm wondering what you specifically, drove down the overall numbers. >> a couple of things, first, labor participation rates are up, it's very good on that front. in the last year, three quarters of the jobs were by people not in the labor force at the time. that's a very good sign. it's one thing to have a low 3.6% unemployment number, it's another to be bringing people in off -- >> that's of reversal of what happened during the obama administration. >> that's right. precipitation participation was trending down. the other thing that leaks out is comparing where we are with

what was predicted. compare where we are now with the congressional budget office predictions and all august 2016 for they said we'd be up 4.9% unemployment they said from then until now, we've had 1.9 million jobs in we added 2 million just last year. there was a change. also change? a new president, new policies. >> in corporate america, when you have requisitions open for too long, either actually go away or replaced by technology. how long can we go without filling these jobs or changing visa structure to where we can import labor to fill these jobs? how can we go? second, when you look at the job growth and the impending great deal with uk and the eu, how long do you think this job growth is sustainable? >> i think the growth is

sustainable. i think the u.s. mca agreement, china phase one are terrific developments of the start of the year that put us on a firm foundation going ahead. in terms of jobs that have been vacant for a while, let me first emphasize how unusual it is to have a business this eager to hire new workers. that's really good news. since these numbers have been practiced only in the last 18 months or so, we had more jobs open than people looking at jobs. we do have to tackle that problem, we need to do it by better training apprenticeships, dropped the opiate crisis, let's do it a better job bringing veterans and. there are things we can do here but the bottom line is, it's a very robust economy. >> let me update you on this

small business pull. a few polls found the approval rating for the trump edit is an all-time high of 65%. heading into the november elections, the labor market and is president trump igniting it? >> the administration policies, which included tax cuts and deregulation igniting the economic. i think there's something for all americans to be excited about that but former president obama at the start of the week tweeted about how great the economy is right now. it's true. we got to squabble about who gets the credit, i think you look at how much better flow wage earners are doing right n now, look at the lowest all-time reported african-american unemployment last year and it's been the tax cuts and deregulation what takes us to the new --

>> i got a very wonky, really nonpartisan -- [laughter] sorry, david. the department of labor and was possible for the whole picture we have of unemployment. it's a very old survey with a set of questions that date back to the 20th century. are you going to do more with the gig economy, what workers are doing and more variety about the nature of these jobs are because a job that $10 an hour, they are both jobs and meaningful but it is something very different in the economy. >> the labor statistics within the labor department is constantly evaluating its methodologies and updating but i will say, obviously we know a lot more with jobs being filled, we know what wages are drink and we know wages have been going up 3% or more for more than a year end we know the gains for lower paid workers have been higher

than their managers. >> we only have one more time for one more question. as you know, this week today in particular, as it changed your projections in terms of jobs, growth because of what it might happen? >> is something we are watching carefully, we gotta terrific team across the administration has been carefully coordinated by secretary lazar. there's not an immediate risk in this country and it's something that watch, it's dynamic but not changing my assessment of this strong economy. >> we have to leave it at that. i'm sorry. we have to have you again. great to see you. secretary pompeo bracing progress on peace talks with taliban. could this finally lead to withdrawal of u.s. troops in afghanistan? foreign policy analyst marie

joining us next with some answers. ♪

beyond the routine checkups. beyond the not-so-routine cases. comcast business is helping doctors provide care in whole new ways. all working with a new generation of technologies powered by our gig-speed network. because beyond technology... there is human ingenuity. every day, comcast business is helping businesses go beyond the expected. to do the extraordinary. take your business beyond. it's our most dangerous addiction. and to get the whole world clean? that takes a lot more than an alternative. so we took our worst vice, and turned it into the dna for a better system. materials made from recycled plastic woven and molded into all the things we consume. we created bionic and put the word out with godaddy.

what will you change? make the world you want. foxbusiness alert, mike pompeo announcing this morning and understanding could lead to reduction of violence on the ground in afghanistan. this is the first time in nearly two decades the taliban is looking to make a deal. he sang the seven-day production environments. begins tonight, both sides committed to ending attacks during this period including roadside bombings, suicide attacks and rocket strikes for the tavern. all those go well, there could be a signing ceremony february 29. let's bring in fox news national security foreign policy analysis, great is your. let me start around the edges of this story, which is the new

york times today had a full page by a member of the taliban called what we, the taliban, want. this was written by the so-called deputy of the taliban. it's so infuriating, a lot of people, even people working for the new york times said this piece in the opinion section, which is independent of our news operation, makes the fact that no taliban peace makers at he's behind some of the most ruthless attacks of the war with many civilian lives lost. i think he's right on back but the question is, how can we negotiate with mass murder? >> here's the problem, if this was happening before 2001, to see if you can make peace with them but this is happening at the 19 years of war. we were involved, that's why you see reaction not by americans, only but by afghan eggs who know

them and what they are up to. that's why you cannot trust but at the same time, they didn't have a problem what to do in afghanistan. >> i've got a call here, he likes the deal. he thinks it's great. come on. a reduction in violence? as they say, don't tell me it's rating. this is when for the taliban. a war and one enemy loses, when they give up their will to fight. there is no reduction in this branch of militant islam hatred and blood for the west. what is really? >> you have a big point. two experts agree with you. i don't think so. the problem here are the other policy, the one that started years ago has not worked.

what is it that we can do? if you asked me academically, dry think their long-term? middle term? no. cease-fire for one week? yes, they would do that for one week. or three weeks or maybe six months but we know it has not changed from what they have not reformed, they will see a large portion of that. it is a problem. >> i wonder, this is different than what jonathan said, the taliban are no more interested in attacking the west any more than the calm or tacking in vietnam, consulting control over afghanistan, it's taken 11 years coming in beginning this proce process, disengagement, choir are we not leading, leaving if we are not committed to staying?

>> it depends on what most americans want and the president listen to voters and citizens, most americans really want to get out, the question is, what would happen after? what happens after is a taliban immediately, or this time we will see at least 40%, if not more afghanistan, and isis like organization and they will go to the civil war. it's also automatically known. should we allow this to happen? should we exchange strategies? there are many options. >> like what? that is a tolerant ultimate goal. make sure the u.s. leaves and we can the afghan government and probably fracture the coalition. >> all the administration, the separatist ration was not really allowing to do the policy because of it mattering.

we have let go of the tribes and ethnic groups. we have done our job, an excellent job but not much in terms of building afghanistan taking over from us. president obama the withdrawal. we seen it happen. >> the last 18 years, what has happened is we've spent billio billions, so much money helping the afghan government. however, at the cost of rebuilding our infrastructure in america and so many other social goods and things of that nature that we could be doing. huge opportunity cost. is it point out better? >> if we do that, our expenses here versus expenses all over the world, it's a choice. all these things we can do here

would be put at risk if we don't take care of our national security. i submit something else. the time that we were there to help raise a generation from kids ten years old we were at afghanistan but now we are in charge of the country. more than a decade was not put into perspective. >> we'll see how this goes. we'll pray for its. thank you very much for being here. appreciate it. top u.s. election security officials warning that russia may try to meddle in the 2020 election. duck. don't they do that every election? more details on which candidates were the surprising newcomers that's next.

washington post is now reporting officials told bernie sanders attempting to interfere with the contest. his coming after the collision charge of russian traveling trump campaign, once again spreading wide like wildfire. >> the president is a russian operative. sounds like the description of a bad hollywood screenplay but it is real. it's vladimir putin's greatest achievement. decades after america's cold war

and the collapse of the soviet union, the president of the united states is now helping the president of russia help the president of the united states to get reelected. >> the news on bernie sanders may force them to change your opinion a little bit by his outrageous charge comes from anonymous sources in the new york times and washington post think russia is interfering in this year's election campaign. on behalf of donald trump. after the last investigation from pressure collision fell flat and altered president trump. democrats really prepared to go this route again? >> the thing is, this is coming back to stop the democrats in the face. poon wants to help. [laughter] we have to make sure we limit interference in the elections but here's the concern. it's almost like a forward here

for president trump, if he actually with these reports, loose forward to try to combat this, someone might say he's trying to undermine bernie sanders campaign. it's damned if you do, damned if you don't. >> what bernie sanders reaction is. >> he says, this is bernie sanders reporting, he says i don't care frankly who putin wants to be president. early? after three years? complaining about donald trump. >> i think we don't know what form this help will come in. right now the intelligent agencies, that's not been divulged and we know social media say helping president trump in the presidency. with all the stringent usa regulations and platforms that facebook has taken, i think would be transformative to see what way it takes. >> intelligence committee

concluded russia trying to interfere in the election and wanted trump to win, that's not the same as saying collision, to bipartisan senate hearing, the entire part including the dna codes can include that as well. >> exhaustive study two years concluded that there was no collusion. collusion is a think we are hearing again. >> what you heard -- but we are not talking about donald. we are talking somebody. >> president trump recently cashiered that acting dni for briefing the house intelligence committee -- >> hold on. what we are talking about is the mass hysteria about there being collusion between russia and donald trump which led to them all reporting even though it came up -- >> is partly different that there's a legitimate concern we are not paying sufficient attention to continue to metal and are election. >> that's the headline here. it shouldn't matter to any

candidate or any president who russia is trying to rooting for. even to this day, i see the obvious russia on twitter, on facebook and some of the messaging platforms. they are just trying to discord for our american way of life or american republic based on this rights. no matter who's in the oval office, they should serve at the top and again, regardless of who we been rooting on, why haven't intelligent agencies and on that? >> there's no doubt but the cap fact is, we have already seen adam schiff and other people involved in the impeachment process continuing to say they have proof of collusion between trump, he is going out again last night as well as larry o'donnell, it wasn't just the pdf saying it. there democrat allies. >> the democrats are complaining

but they have no solution. they don't even want to work with the president trump on anything including protecting our elections. what is the way going forward? first they say putin is helping trump, now that he's trying to help bernie, what if the democrats go? >> one of the democrats go from here? >> what is it say about best for america, helping bernie sanders. >> the house has passed bills about election security allowing them -- >> the senate hasn't taken enough, the republicans won't act on it. >> after this news by the sanders campaign, or about the sanders campaign, it will be interesting to see what happens. what one college promising free tuition for some students in an effort to expand campus financial aid but whose footing the bill? the debate, next.

♪

>> university of southern california says they will phase in free tuition for students with families with an annual income of $80000 or less in homeownership will not be used to determine a student's financial need. that could be a big deal for 5% of parents who use home equity loans to pay for college. carol missing we are opening the door wider into making ust education possible for talented students from all walks of life. usc is a private school, has $5.7 billion so put it or should it be a model for other colleges around the country? >> for private institution, they want to spend the $5.7 billion to tuition for those under $80000, fine. that's a median income in california. wouldn't a lot of students reach that threshold?

>> one third of the students would be qualified for that. >> philanthropy is going to essentially pick up the check. they will take a heck of a lot of philanthropy to keep up think about. it doesn't address the systematic reason here of why college tuition is so expensive. it's because of government. all the subsidies and grants and incentives to raise that price of tuition, to raise the cost of the administration so high because you know ultimately government will pick up the check. keep in mind the discussion comes at the context of a most assured loan forgiveness. when it comes to peoples student loans. >> that's not why tuition is rising. >> subsidized by managers.

>> that is completely different. >> ust is not subsidized by government. the fact is they are private -- >> they get a minimum amount. you cannot bridge the gap tuition going up. it doesn't work that way. a market driven phenomenon, if ust wants to do this and have everybody major in their alumni and senators are willing to fund it, that is their purview. we all just know -- jonathan used the term for the word philanthropy. we know this is coming back on factors. it's not one policy i california passed and is probably pending on the democratic role that benefited the overall environment in terms of that. >> the standard of living but we know things don't stay in a vacuum. it spreads. the thing is, if it spreads

throughout the entire country like you said in terms of loan forgiveness, all this other stuff, -- >> let's look at the positive side, there are other colleges and universities, private schools i have huge endowments. look at harvard and yale. maybe this will change them in providing free tuition for everybody. what else are they going to do? >> the largest in the world and yes, they can't afford to give free tuition, 100,000 or something like that but for private institution, i think private institutions, you are free to spend the money anyway you want. there are actual subsidies and government. >> millionaires and billionaires, without them, these colleges wouldn't have any way. >> i disagree. look at the cost from hamburgers to iphones, subsidies for loans to buy out those costs.

let us millionaires and billionaires produce, they want their names on these and they are paying for it. >> we have another california story. california lawmaker has a new plan to combat homelessness and tackle for hosting housing with it was such a debate on that coming up. ♪

[ sigh ] not gonna happen. that's it. i'm calling kohler about their walk-in bath. my name is ken. how may i help you? hi, i'm calling about kohler's walk-in bath. excellent! happy to help. huh? hold one moment please... [ finger snaps ] hmm. the kohler walk-in bath features an extra-wide opening and a low step-in at three inches, which is 25 to 60% lower than some leading competitors. the bath fills and drains quickly, while the heated seat soothes your back, neck and shoulders.

kohler is an expert in bathing, so you can count on a deep soaking experience. are you seeing this? the kohler walk-in bath comes with fully adjustable hydrotherapy jets and our exclusive bubblemassag. everything is installed in as little as a day by a kohler-certified installe. and it's made by kohler- america's leading plumbing brand. we need this bath. yes. yes you do. a kohler walk-in bath provides independence with peace of mind. the end might not be as happy as ayou think.end. after all, 4 out of 5 people who have a stroke, their first symptom is a stroke! but the good news is you can rewrite your ending and get screened for stroke and cardiovascular disease. life line screening is the easy and affordable way to make you aware of undetected health problems before they hurt you. we use ultrasound technology to literally look inside your

arteries for plaque that builds up as you age- and increases your risk for stroke and heart disease. so if you're over 40, call to schedule an appointment for five painless screenings that go beyond annual checkups. and if you call us today, you'll only pay $149-an over 50% savings. read it again, papa? sure. i've got plenty of time. life line screening. the power of prevention. call now to learn more. officials in the people's republic of barkley say they have a plan to address homelessness and housing shortage in the state of calvary. a lot of skeptics say it could end up making things worse. the plan would give renters first dibs to buying an apartment rental if it goes up for sale. the tenant recalls signed their rights to an affordable housing

developer to purchase the property on their behalf. it remains unclear whether property owners have to accept lower bids from tenants. is this plan going to solve anything? >> i'd give this plan and f. it doesn't solve homelessness. people were homeless, when you look at the streets of california, they don't have the money to buy a one coming dollar apartment. or pay $3400 for an apartment. i see their issue in different categories in terms of helping the homeless and also helping them already seeking our new apartment that has a livelihood in terms of wherewithal to keep them from actually going to the streets. what they need to do is build more housing to address the supply but they also need to perhaps adopt what we have here in new york city in terms of co-ops. things of that nature. build affordable housing and give them an opportunity to get

into housing on their own. i agree with john it's astonishing. [laughter] i'll just ended there. barkley let the building restrictions are so tight that nothing will get done. they can build shelters and you treat this as if there's 20000, 20000 in san francisco at least were only on the but their bid for their apartment turned down. it's ludicrous. there's a process here that is not exactly complicated even methods are tractable and the regulations, the inability of barkley's early device housing from a wealthy community. >> barkley is the most expensive city in the u.s. it's the seventh most expensive city in the world and i'm glad you understand, regulations are what drives up the cost.

if barkley decide who got caught, how high it's going to be and even nowadays, this legislation about who you can sell to bring all this does is incentivized to make those people invest. if it wasn't for silicon valley, people would literally run in the area. >> and buck university. >> that's right, i applaud that, it's been successful with the most creative innovative companies in the world in this small place but then they are seeing property market and tweeting out infidels. new tax companies? why don't you give us more housing, money to build more housing? i do about the innovative culture -- >> summative the homeless problem, we discovered here in new york when we went a long way, it doesn't completely solve these things but we went through

a lot of ways to solve these things. it's not financial, it's a matter of making it difficult, net making it easier for people to live on the street but making it more difficult to live on the streets. >> is a part of these economic reports that makes the clear argument that more regulation hurts the bottom half of america. the more regulations we have, the more displacement in people who are marginalized can't find -- >> to get back to this barkley solution there's more regulations within this plan then you have now. that's not going to help solve anything. >> a disincentive to create that they are seeing this type of homelessness in every area, the building regulations, if you're not going to build tall buildings or dents buildings,

you're going to make housing expensive. five or $6000 a month to rent, he will have people on the streets. >> sorry, do you sometimes have a burning desire for mcdonald's quarter pounder but can't get to one? you don't want all the calories? you might just be in luck. details on fast food giant new rollout, next. so and get your interest rate right so you can save big. get a no-fee personal loan up to $100k. it's unacceptable that americans pay vastly more than get a no-fee personal loan people in other countries, for the exact same drugs. but they aren't listening. they've just raised the prices of over five hundred drugs. president trump supports a bipartisan plan, that would force drug companies to lower prices. but the senate won't act.

tell senate leaders to stop drug company price gouging and lower drug prices now. their medicare options...ere people go to learn about before they're on medicare. come on in. you're turning 65 soon? yep. and you're retiring at 67? that's the plan! well, you've come to the right place. it's also a great time to learn about an aarp medicare what are you taking like for food one you feed him tacos before they go or the hungry man comes with the hamburger untruthful to learn that one.

com call unitedhealthcare insurance company today... to request this free, and very helpful, decision guide. and learn about the only medicare supplement plans endorsed by aarp. selected for meeting their high standards of quality and service. this type of plan lets you say "yes" to any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. there are no networks or referrals to worry about. do you accept medicare patients? i sure do! see? you're able to stick with him. like to travel? this kind of plan goes with you anywhere you travel in the country. so go ahead, spend winter somewhere warm. if you're turning 65 soon or over 65 and planning to retire, find out more about the plans that live up to their name.

thumbs up to that! remember, the time to prepare is before you go on medicare! don't wait. get started today. call unitedhealthcare and ask for your free decision guide. learn more about aarp medicare supplement plan options and rates to fit your needs oh, and happy birthday... or retirement... in advance. >> could a candle smell good enough to eat. this one might, mcdonald's released a six piece set of scented candles that smell like all the ingredients of a quarter pounder. mcdonald says lighting them at the same time get you maximum deliciousness. so is anybody hungry for one of these? [laughter]

>> i'm sorry the idea of walking home and having my house smell like a local mcdonald's because my kids are my wife scented it as such -- >> output that is a negative. >> please know for my birthday. >> there's nothing like the smell of a beef burger on a grill. give me too beef candles but hold the onion. >> no onion. >> that's not what i want to go home to at any point ever. >> any food you would die for the smell of. >> popcorn? >> they see the taste, two thirds of taste is smell. so basically -- you will get all the experience eating a big. >> but 0 the calories. i think it's a great idea. >> is there any food you'd like to smell often.

>> no problem at all. bring on the big gulp. i don't like the idea of scented candle. >> even fresh popcorn? >> no. >> i like it and jonathan is not big on the idea. that's it for "bulls & bears" see you next time. liz: president trump rally in las vegas, people have been lining up for days, this is about momentum and who has the narrative and the story. let's look at last night rally, the president thinks veterans who fought at your sherman. americas does love his heroes, we have more polls that show this president has real momentum, who really lost to the democrat debate, the entire state of credibility, democrats telling americans the economy is not working but the democrat say you did not bill that, president trump, we the democrats built the economic boom and president obama obam