over fist, smuggling these people up to the border. the dangers of large numbers of crossings, the cost to local public health resources and crime is up the charts. elizabeth: thanks for joining us, we'll have you back on again soon. join us again tomorrow night. ♪♪ kennedy: >> confused president biden put a foot in his mouth again and couldn't have come in a worse political moment. i am guy benson and for kennedy again, thank you for being here. by virtually every major, it's awful week for the biden administration. monday the judge shut down the mandate that would force all of us to wear masks on planes and trains as we all did for so long and yesterday they announced their plan to appeal said ruling because science or whatever. at the same time the white house

has been insisting they will end title 42 which is a pandemic era tool used by border officials to rapidly expel illegal immigrants entering the country. a growing course of democrats slamming this idea say it's bad policy and more important, a political loser. today a reporter asked president biden about title 42 which is the immigration issue. his answer? cringing us. >> title 42, are you considering delaying? >> we are not considering, we are continuing to hear from my -- first of all, there will be an appeal by the justice department because as a matter of principle, we want to be in the position where it is strongly concluded by the scientists that we need title 42, we can do that but there has been no decision on extending title 42.

guy: what is he talking about? oh, he confused title 42 with the mask mandate ruling the medical term i believe is a brain fart, it's been happening a lot. hours later, they issued a clarification saying quote, i want to clarify that and comments at the conclusion of my remarks this morning i was referring to the cdcs mask mandate and there's no department of justice action on title 42. call me crazy but that correction didn't exactly infuse me with confidence that he has a solid grasp on either issue and by the way, he still didn't answer the question on title 42. back to the masks which once again is a separate matter, guess who's weighing in. noted constitutional scholar doctor anthony fauci. that's who. of course he is appearing earlier on cnn plus all right, florida fauci said this. >> we are concerned about that, course getting involved in

things unequivocally public health decisions. this is the cdc issue, it should not have been a core issue. guy: with all due respect, the cdc has zero legislative power and it's not at all exempt from judicial review. the way i see it, this is fauci seeming to believe again his own sense of propriety is amount to coequal branch of government. it's both revealing and major part of the problem. let's discuss with tonight panel, new york post columnist karol markowicz is here, radio host democrat strategist and fox news contributor, leslie marshall and insight analyst and author, stephen kent is with us. karol, doctor fauci we recall has informed us that he is the science. he himself is science. now he's also the law. >> it is amazing because i hadn't heard from him in a while and i enjoyed that, i think it

is while he continues to be on our television screen. he's responsible for a large amount of misinformation the last two years. i wish somebody would hold him accountable but nobody does he continues to spout random things on television and i mean that because one thing to say one thing and another day he'll say another and nobody says you said something different on monday and now it's tuesday. i'd love to never see his face on our tv again, disappear into their the way he should and let us move on. guy: literally on the screen, a screenshot like you've got, you know who they are. >> dang it, guy. guy: but i understand what you're asking for, they be someday in the future there's more hot air coming out of doctor fauci then apparently whatever leaf blower is operating in someone's neighborhood. as a democrat, is it helpful to your party to have doctor fauci spouting force various

pronouncements as we get closer and closer to the midterms? i think it gets people like karol extra itchy to go out and vote. >> and it not that karol wants to cancel, i'd like to cancel the leaf blower in my neighborhood. guy: it was the -- okay, go ahead. >> i'm going to lame the republican leaf blower. listen, anthony fauci doesn't speak for either political party but i can tell you who does and should speak, living with a medical professional who lived through the help and may live through the hell again of the pandemic and that is our healthcare workers, medical professionals and we don't go to politicians when we are sick. looking at the numbers from the past, we know we can't trust everybody in this country, not everybody will get vaccinated or will where masks or social distance, not everybody even believes the virus is real and you can catch it or transmit it

especially to vulnerable population people who have underlined conditions, the elderly and the young. i don't think it helps, i don't think it hurts. i think at the end of the day there are people who look at and believe signs whether they consider doctor fauci to be at the helm of that and there are people who don't and that is part of the problem and why we are still having more than two years after the onset of this, a discussion, a debate, confusion and anger about masks and mandates. guy: next time, you should have the leaf blower literally in the room and you can have that wonderful effect with your hair, it would be very dramatic and your points would be even better. stephen, here's the problem. >> i don't know if that's an insult or a complement. guy: it is a compliment, i don't even remember what i said but it's a compliment for sure. there's an arrogant ignorant combination with fauci, i'm not

calling him ignorant on science although plenty of doctors disagree with him on this, he's ignorant on the constitution and extremely arrogant when it comes to his view of science or exemplifying or personifying science as he said before, couldn't he just stay in his lane and try to persuade people if he thinks they should wear a mask on airplanes or whatever reason, if he doesn't believe the filtration systems work or what have you, shouldn't he appeal to that and talk about why masks are a good idea as opposed to waiting for the constitutional system of checks and balances as if what is this judge, the judge can tell us what we are doing. actually, she can. that's our system. >> that is absolutely the case, all who have power are afraid to lose it and anthony fauci is not immune from that but you will find if you look into the public polling here, he does enjoy a bit of public support over the perspective masks should be maintained on public

transportation. it's the case as of at least march republicans and democratic voters combined agreed up to 58% that masks should maintain in those public transportation environments. more republicans actually feel that way than you might expect and i think that is a twisted normalcy bias you see in play but it's really bad politics and shocking to see play out the biden administration would punch it back over to the cdc to make this move for them because they are going to be the ones who eat it in november when people are mad they got their freedoms back and then have them taken away again, it's the same effect you see play out with social welfare and students of government give something, they can never give it back without looking like the bad guy and the biden administration and democrats will be the bad guys here. guy: meanwhile president biden finding it more difficult by the day to keep his own party in

line. nervous democrats in congress increasingly speaking out against impending repeal of title 42 which we mentioned in the open. that's likely happening next month, that's when it's scheduled to happen. these democrats rightly fear of border crisis morphing into complete border meltdown. there's no coincidence a majority of the most local democrats are seeking reelection in november. go figure. with the white house listen to the parties concerns or push ahead on their own? it's rough out there for your party right now, the polls show that and we'll get that in the next segment breaking down the numbers, it border crisis increasingly in the headlines and spiraling is probably not what the democrats need in this moment given everything that's happening. do you think the president would be wise to listen to this chorus of voices and say maybe title 42, let's pump that for a while? >> if they were just politically

motivated, they are going to laugh or shake their heads, i don't think president joe biden is motivated by the polls or by people for reelection in districts that are red or purple or border states but you have good points, politically immigration is one of the top issues among both democrats and republicans and kid add in independence as well so people up for reelection especially in border states, red districts within their state are concerned about that but here is the bigger picture. title 42 in my opinion, i'm not alone in this, is a band-aid on something that needs major reconstructive surgery which is comprehensive major river heads of reform and both have been failing at in congress in their responsibility if we change and fix amnesty laws, people won't

come to apply for amnesty and they can do it in their home country and that be a problem solved and no president would have to do that, it would just take elected officials. guy: karol, it's true title 42 is not a cure all solution to the immigration problems. however, is it at least a tool? the only remaining tool officials have down there to deal with this massive search and then take it away during the height of the season with the problem already getting worse? you can say you're getting rid of a band-aid but it is a pretty big band-aid and the blood flow will get even more dramatic over the summer. >> rights. democrats can't decide if covid-19 remains present enough of a concern to force 2-year-old to wear their masks on flights or contained enough to allow illegal immigrants to stream into the country. the politicized ddc are making the decisions and they want whatever the far left activists

want. i think it is a real problem for the democrats and politically a problem and a problem for the country going forward. what do we want to do here? will be take control of our border or army? the band-aid, i agree. it's not enough but the democrats need to start somewhere and the band-aid might be the place to begin. guy: this decision title 42 is a policy disaster that happens to be terrible for them politically in their like let's do it, stick to the plan next month. stephen, call me a cynic but it seems like the democrats who did not care at all about border security, they are very concerned about it and worried about title 42, every single senate democrats voted against them from ted cruz which would enshrine title 42 protected if they all voted no, against it eight months ago and then they see the light like this come to jesus moment, title 42 is vital. it's almost as if they are reading polls and focus groups and pretending for a few more months to care about the issue.

>> i've never call you a cynic but i duty for to the wisdom here of democratic strategists james who recently said americans generally like immigration. but they do not like is disorder or chaos. we just got out of the field at as a line with our april polling and what we found on immigration does show democrats and republicans united are livid about what's going on at the border, 58% combined disapproval. it's a huge number but there are other huge numbers we also found. between 50 and 77 pursuant support, almost every solution under the sun, building a wall, drone valence, amnesty for dreamers, increased thesis and l fees us, americans just want to see something happen, they are willing to accept almost any solution besides open borders which is the only one underwater but what we have right now is a

perception of de facto open borders and what james said, mayor chaos and disorder and it doesn't work. guy: the chaos is that enough now, 220,000 encounters and tens of thousands of getaways last month and then exploded when you get rid of title 42, half of that number last month back to mexico and other countries, if that tool goes away, the chaos and disorder we are warned about will be front and center, unavoidable and that's why democrats say i don't have fingernails on this. panel sticking around, president biden's approval rating taking, virtually everything he touches. will that include the democratic majority after november? we'll ask tom bevan next. ♪♪ it can be a smaller house, but a bigger nest egg. a goal to work toward, or the freedom to walk away.

with 200 years of experience, personalized advice, and commission free trades on an award-winning app, we are working for you. planning. investing. advice. jp morgan wealth management. your shipping manager left to “find themself.” leaving you lost. you need to hire. i need indeed. indeed you do. indeed instant match instantly delivers quality candidates matching your job description. visit indeed.com/hire asya agulnik md: st. jude was founded with an understanding matching your job description. that no child should die in the dawn of life. to work with many partners all over the world, nothing stops in the way of us achieving that mission, not even war. marta salek md: when there is a need, people stand up and do what is right and ensure that they restart medical therapy as quickly as possible. carlos rodriguez-galindo md: any child suffering today of cancer is our responsibility.

tums vs. mozzarella stick when heartburn hits, fight back fast with tums chewy bites. fast heartburn relief in every bite. crunchy outside, chewy inside. ♪ tums, tums, tums, tums ♪ tums chewy bites with my hectic life, you'd think retirement would be the last thing on my mind. thankfully, voya provides comprehensive solutions, and shows me how to get the most out of my workplace benefits. voya helps me feel like i got it all under control. voya. well planned. well invested. well protected. ♪ ♪

♪ ♪ well invested. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪

is not just the house on the line this november, poll numbers show president biden can cost democrats the senate, two. new report claims president is pulling dangerously low and forth states where senate seats are most likely to switch from d to r. arizona, georgia, nevada and new hampshire. all four states went blue in 2020 but are they about to go read this year?

here with me now, real clear politics cofound executive editor, tom bevan, good to see you, welcome. >> great to be with you. guy: i saw larry's organization shifted their ratings on 11 house races just this week and all 11 of the changes were in the republican direction. this is starting to give me flashbacks to 2010 when republicans gained 63 house seats in the first midterm election after barack obama was first elected and a friend of mine was saying could this be worse for the democrats? is the environment worse in 2010? i figured you're probably the best person to ask how does this compare in your mind at this stage? are still pretty far out. >> it's as bad as we've seen for the democrats in a long time. the one main difference between now is 2008 barack obama brought along a bunch of house members and senate members so a lot of facts to be trimmed.

republicans did really well and the house of representatives the so there aren't as many seats in place so you may not get to that big of a number but the environment is as bad as we have seen generic congressional publicans of three and a half points which is a pretty high number historically speaking, usually democrats we do not, a national number, not purple states and swing districts of public worse for democrats in those areas so the only silver lining is what you said, the election isn't held tomorrow, still six months away and time for democrats to recover at least some ground from where they stand now. guy: on the senate side, there are exactly two senate democrats who have shown any degree of meaningful independence from this administration from the party line, joe manchin, kyrsten sinema, neither are up this cycle so when you look at the vulnerable democrats in the senate, they are all in some ways generic democrats who rubberstamped biden schumer

virtually every single time, does that make it easier for the republicans to tie the whole slate of candidates across the country to a president whose numbers are not good? >> sure. when is nobody else in control, there's nobody else to blame. they control the house and the senate and the white house. you look at new hampshire, poll out today, she's running basically dead even with three republicans who nobody in the state knows who they are, it doesn't matter who they are, a generic republican and incumbent between running between 44th -- 47% and that's a state biden one by seven points in 2020, a lot better off, a lot more blue than nevada or arizona or georgia so it gives you a sense of how deep the hole is.

you mentioned race changes, a lot of political prognosticators look at it and say if you are, a district biden one by less than ten points, nine points or less, you are vulnerable. democrats are up against it across the country in swing states and swing districts. guy: i would say of the senate map as you think about these races, i also remember in 2010 and 2012 republicans lost points on the field with bad nominees, bad candidates and i think republican voters this time should think about those lessons as they go to the ballot box during the primary election season. tom bevan, good to see you, thank you, sir. next, tesla ceo in the lord elon musk now trying a new financial tactic to take over twitter. how would it work? can twitter deploy countermeasures like they did last time? brian brenberg, he's coming up. ♪♪

she always had your back... like the time she spotted the neighbor kid, an approaching car, a puddle, and knew there was going to be a situation. ♪ ♪ ms. hogan's class? yeah, it's atlantis. nice. i don't think they had camels in atlantis. really? today she's a teammate at truist, the bank that starts with care when you start with care, you get a different kind of bank. (vo) for me, one of the best things about life is that we keep moving forward. when you start with care, we discover exciting new technologies. redefine who we are and how we want to lead our lives. basically, choose what we want our future to look like. so what's yours going to be?

we have to be able to repair the enamel on a daily basis. with pronamel repair toothpaste, we can help actively repair enamel in its weakened state. it's innovative. my go to toothpaste is going to be pronamel repair. my go to toothpaste since i left for college, my dad has gotten back into some of his old hobbies. and now he's taking trulicity, and it looks like he's gotten into some new healthier habits, too.

what changes are you making for your type 2 diabetes? maybe it's time to try trulicity. it's proven to help lower a1c. it can help you lose up to 10 pounds. and it's only taken once a week, so it can fit into your busy life. trulicity is for type 2 diabetes. it isn't for people with type 1 diabetes. it's not approved for use in children. don't take trulicity if you're allergic to it, you or your family have medullary thyroid cancer, or have multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have an allergic reaction, a lump or swelling in your neck, severe stomach pain, changes in vision, or diabetic retinopathy. serious side effects may include pancreatitis. taking trulicity with sulfonylurea or insulin raises low blood sugar risk. side effects include nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, which can lead to dehydration, and may worsen kidney problems. the choices you make can help control your a1c. ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity.

at jp morgan, the only definition of wealth that matters is yours. it can be a smaller house, but a bigger nest egg. a goal to work toward, or the freedom to walk away. with 200 years of experience, personalized advice, and commission free trades on an award-winning app, we are working for you.

planning. investing. advice. jp morgan wealth management. elon musk has another trick up his sleeve. in his bid to take over twitter, this is quite the offer, the tesla ceo says he secured roughly 46.5 billion dollars to take twitter private. he's putting up 21 billion in equity himself and said he's got another 25 and a half billion in loans and financing. remember twitter's board has been giving him the cold shoulder with the poison pill option the rollout in response to his previous offer but now he's taking his case and money directly to shareholders. without work? joining me now, fox news contributor professor of business and economics king's college in manhattan, brian brenberg. it's great to see you.

he's serious about this, isn't he? >> he definitely is. the big question was, will you make an offer, is will you find the thing? he didn't specify that when he made the initial offer so twitter's board had a way out, they could say he made an offer for 43 billion but we don't know how he's going to pay for it so musk comes back today and says i've got the money. i've got my own equity, i can make this work. guy: what jujitsu move could twitter use here beyond this poison pill to repel this again? >> that was there jujitsu move to say if you owe more than 50% we will flood the market with shares and you will never get more than that. what they are probably going to say now is your offer is still not good enough because last year twitter was $70 a share, your offering 5420 a share, that's not enough so we won't take your offer so that is there play. of course twitter stock isn't near $54, it's a pretty good deal so you can see shareholders

say $70 was last year but it's a pretty good deal and the only reason twitter stock is up at all in recent days is because musk is involved, he seems to be the secret right now. guy: he gave that interview a week or two ago when he said there was a plan b but wouldn't survive. this doesn't strike me as plan b, this is just putting all the money on the table plan a. so plan b could be what? >> real offer to the board and make them rejected. plan b would go to directly shareholders in this offer, your board doesn't want to so here is my deal, i'll give you this amount of money a share if you sign up with me and leaves the deal on the table with shareholders and if he gets enough of them saying we'll do it, now he's got pressure on the board. shareholders and musk go back to the board and say people want this, why aren't you taking it? if they don't take it, now you talk about shareholders suits

and nasty takeovers, that's plan b and where he turns the table. guy: is it possible for him to talk to certain shareholders and by their shares directly and take one bite after another? boom it's like 9.2 and then another 4%, another two and a half%. >> it's different now that he has to do that in public, shareholders see it and he's making a play, that might start making it more expensive to do that so he does it all in one fell swoop. here's my deal, if you like it, if you think this is better than your prospects with the twitter board, take it right now so he's going to go public. this is a behind the scenes thing with the board, he could make this a public thing with shareholders. guy: speaking of going public, he's done that in terms of public relations, he's tweeting

about this so he's making promises and putting pulls up about what he could do with twitter, what you make of that strategy? is it smart, is he just messing with the board? >> he's got so much leverage and what he's showing them if you don't play ball, i can make life very hard for you and that's what he's doing and he'll keep doing that and they are not as savvy as he is and what he's showing is on the secret, i've got an idea for twitter that can resuscitate it, it's a stagnant platform right now, he's the guy who can make it interesting. shareholders can see that in public can see that, that's where he puts pressure. the board wants to say no but if musk wants this, he can make it happen. guy: that's doable and what started as an interesting sidebar and everyone is like this is a fun and shiny aspect -- >> they put billions on the line, you got to be serious. guy: it is fascinating to watch, great to see you. now it turns out that twitter is

not mr. musk's only target. earlier this week he tweeted this, the woke mind virus is making netflix unwatchable. that was after the screening giant reported losing subscribers for the first time in over a decade causing stocks to plummet. now down 35% from three days ago. netflix blames the troubles on increased competition, inflation and pulling business out of russia. the company now says they are considering crackdown on password sharing and potentially introducing ads into its streaming content which i thought the whole thing was to not have ads. the changes could further alienate subscribers. ask yourself, if you got kicked off your exes account, would you sign up and get netflix for yourself? the panel is back, karol, leslie and stephen. i know musk and others say it's about netflix going woke and now broke or whatever but could it

just be a quality of content issue? could be competition where there are so many options out there? i'm not sure it's a simple political explanation. >> i buy netflix's explanation here for why they are seeing this, the sharp decline, this has been coming for a long time, the market opening all of their now rivals saw in 2019, 2020 when we saw the beginning of peacock and disney+ and paramount plus and hbo max, it's the netflix hardly owned any of their super popular intellectual property. their most popular heavily viewed shows were friends, parks and recreation and the office. none of those things are on netflix anymore. you have to go to the competition now who have taken their ip back like star wars is no longer on netflix, you have to go to disney+ so what you're left with on netflix is a huge focus on international content,

i think they are rebuilding their content library for non-english speakers and that makes a different environment for who's going to be watching. guy: karol, how many of these services do you subscribe to in your house? >> i'm not a big tv watcher but i will say. guy: except for this show, excuse me -- >> obviously except for this show, any show you are on, guy benson, i am watching but every time i go to netflix, i feel a level of woke that is prevalent and what netflix viewers know and are realizing is that wokeness is boring and unoriginal and very conformist and you can't create good art within the lines. i'm thinking about things i've seen on netflix scrolling past it but dear white people, female viking warriors, that just is not an audience who wants this. netflix is doing great when they put out the dave chapelle special.

less woke is pretty obvious. they had higher share values. guy: on this issue of password sharing, i'm not asking you to incriminate yourself or anyone you know but allegedly this happens time to time especially when there's like 17 things you have out there and maybe someone dog sat at your house for a week once and she's a hulu subscriber and the password is saved and you want to watch something, totally hypothetical i'm bringing up, could the crackdown they are talking about, could the crackdown on password sharing actually annoy people enough it could hurt them even though it's fully within their rights to do it? it could just annoy people and maybe annoying their customer base is what they need to do right now? >> i have two teens who use my passwords, they are not getting their own passwords, i am one

mama who would be annoyed by this. this has nothing to do with wokeness, i'm sorry. i am a liberal on the panel and i can laugh out loud at that. but it has to do with his netflix recently increased prices and people are paying more for gas in the car and other items, groceries at the market so people are saying this is just not a priority. also the other panel, panelist was spot on. you didn't ask but i'm going to tell you, and i hate to admit it but in my fantasy i can binge watch something someday somewhere at some time so i have all of these lists on hulu, apple, amazon, netflix that i never get to but i think during the pandemic when a lot of people were home and working from home and not out and about as much, they said this is my life and what i'm going to do and many people have more time were unemployed to binge watch

these things so it's not a priority pricewise, the price increased and then they have so many other options out there and last, so many other things to do with their lives than just sit down and watch something on the box. guy: you listed for services and i'm like check, check and check, we've got all of them but i find myself going to netflix less often. it's not as appealing, the stuff i'm hearing buzz about is elsewhere, content may be is king, that could be the simplest explanation but what is some other stuff out there muddying the waters? don't go anywhere because coming up we are turning to a serious topic, ukraine which remains in tumult as russian assault continues. one prominent democratic lawmaker recently floated the idea of sending an american troops to ukraine. how tobacco over? combat veteran joey jones here in studio to discuss after this. ♪♪

will life is for living. let's partner for all of it. i'm so glad we did this. edward jones

a balloon shot down, this week delaware limited chris coons appear to signal support for possibly sending american troops to engage in a direct war with russia and ukraine. the white house said especially, he disagreed. watch. >> important, bipartisan and measured way we in congress and administration come to a common position about when we are willing to go next step and send not just arms but troops to the aid and defense of ukraine. if the answer is never, then we are inviting another level of escalation and totality. >> disparate, especially disagree with this proposal. the president has no plans to send to fight a war with russia, he doesn't think that's in our national security interest or interest of the american people. guy: senator coons walked that back saying he's not calling for u.s. troops to go to ukraine

after all. although it sounded like that's what he's calling for. joining me now, retired marine sgt., joey jones, great to see you. this was discussed by some people as maybe a trial, coons is very close to biden, both from delaware, was this coons going out and putting something there and seeing how it went over? it didn't go over well on either side of the aisle. let me ask you this, you can comment on what he said or not, you put on the uniform, you sacrifice as we all know, a lot. what is the threshold in your mind as you think about metrics and if there's a debate about u.s. troops going somewhere and being in harm's way? what criteria do you think should be followed in your mind from your perspective that would make that worth it versus not? >> it's simple, the sovereignty

in lies america, that's where we are so if it's not threatening american lives for our country as a whole, this administration doesn't get to send troops to war after what happened last year. they've lost that opportunity. our entire government has. less than 40 years of every two years redefining what the war on terror is and how we fight it to benefit whomever was trying to unseat whomever and our government has done that for too long and as americans we have either accepted or only cared about 24 months and it's time to ask hard questions and for us to ask hard questions both for the american people as well. time for the american people to vote for people who proactively have a strategy and back it up. our leaders at the top have not shown that very often. i don't sit around and praise trump for everything, never wore a red hat but i voted for him twice and don't believe in any

specific politicians all that much. what i enjoyed about the trump doctrine is this long usage, the usage of posturing in that way so he see something he, he lets you know if you do that, i'll blow you up and if they do it, he blows them up and it's the torrents, at least your enemy knows you are willing to take. guy: and he followed through. >> that's what i'm trying to say is he let you know and then he would do it. with this administration, so much the tailwagging by the dog, seems like there defense strategy is almost connected to polls and by doing so, the polls are bad because they are waiting to see, was this a trial balloon? did biden ask and see what they think? now we know the biden strategy is no truth but why? why no troops? is it because you think the americans are not behind it or you don't want to save american

sovereignty? the idea of doing something because it's what needs to be done and making the case for the american people after the fact even, that's one thing but what this is, is looking at elections saying what's the least i can get by with two maybe not lose the next election? that's not how you fight, not necessarily fight a war but handle defense or foreign policy. guy: you invoked afghanistan, i'm glad you did. we were chatting on the radio and afghanistan came up and you talked about your context, guys you know working diligently, very hard to get people in harm's way out of the country and they were expressing great frustration with the state department and now experiencing the same feeling of frustration again in eastern europe, tell us about that. >> my favorite political documentary is the campaign and if you know that, bring your

rooms because it's a mess, that's how it feels, so disjointed and such a mess the way our state and defense department responded in afghanistan and what's happening in ukraine now and you've elaborated on that but good friends who spent time in south africa or in africa fighting against slavery under the guise of counter and he was in south america, he came on fox news with bullet holes in him days after getting shot in south america bringing home back to america those who were sex trafficked and then he was contracted to go to afghanistan to get people out of afghanistan and now he's in poland working to provide human intelligence, basically gathered intelligence from russians and russian operations back into ukraine. his comments to me, the very first comment on afghanistan when he got back, i've been to

places where a new the government wouldn't have my back but this is the first time they saw they were working against me and what i was doing and he says they are disjointed in ukraine as well. guy: disappointing to hear, maybe not surprising but the selecting. good to see you. coming up, the big streaming service. the panel is back the way and straight ahead. ♪♪ and a seasoned pro. this mom's one step closer to their new mini-van! yeah, you'll get used to it. this mom's depositing money with tools on-hand. cha ching. and this mom, well, she's setting an appointment here, so her son can get set up there and start his own financial journey. that's because these moms all have chase. smart bankers. convenient tools. one bank with the power of both. chase. make more of what's yours. ♪ we could walk forever ♪

( ♪♪ ) ♪ walking on ♪ ♪ walking on the moon ♪ ♪ some ♪ ♪ may say ♪ ♪ i'm wishing my days away ♪ ♪ no way ♪ ♪ walking on the moon ♪ asya agulnik md: st. jude was founded with an understanding ♪ no way ♪ that no child should die in the dawn of life. to work with many partners all over the world, nothing stops in the way of us achieving that mission, not even war. marta salek md: when there is a need, people stand up and do what is right and ensure that they restart medical therapy as quickly as possible. carlos rodriguez-galindo md: any child suffering today of cancer is our responsibility. stuff. we love stuff.

and there's some really great stuff out there. but i doubt that any of us will look back on our lives and think, "i wish i'd bought an even thinner tv, found a lighter light beer, or had an even smarter smartphone." do you think any of us will look back on our lives and regret the things we didn't buy? or the places we didn't go? ♪ i'd go the whole wide world ♪ ♪ i'd go the whole wide world ♪ at xfinity, we live and work in the same neighborhood as you. we're always working to keep you connected to what you love. and now, we're working to bring you the next generation of wifi. it's ultra-fast. faster than a gig. supersonic wifi. only from xfinity. it can power hundreds of devices with three times the bandwidth. so your growing wifi needs will be met. supersonic wifi

only from us... xfinity.

tonight we pay respect to a letter, plus. there multibillion-dollar platform shutting down next week after less than a month operation. who could possibly have seen this humiliating failure coming besides everyone? cnn three is struggling to attract viewers, how was cnn to going to work? it didn't. panel has returned, leslie, karol and stephen. karol, i'm not gleeful over this, i'm not. people will just lose their jobs and not just the big names will be fine, hard-working producers and people behind the scenes trying to earn a living, i'm trying to understand how many

people got together in a room many times and decided is a good idea and it's going to work? >> i feel bad for the non- millionaires on cnn but who thought this would be a good idea? it is baffling to me and tells me somebody got convinced into something that could never work. like you said, who saw cnn low ratings and thought no one was to watch for free but perhaps they want to pay for it? be one leslie who's apparently chloroformed the landscape from earlier, which was good move, i am not surprised this didn't work, it's not a viable platform given the offerings and the whole deal, i am shocked by the scope and speed of this implosion. that's what caught me off guard. what about you? >> i would agree. one of the things i think a lot

of people, not just cnn and i'll echo the sentiments of netflix but switch it around, i have to say in our business, we have to do a lot of research for our jobs. radio and running right columns and i'm annoyed i have to subscribe and sign up and provide my e-mails and what samples to read an article to find the information and the stats in the article elsewhere and are free. i think there's a few things. if you're not number one, if you are not selling hamburgers at your joints, branch out in franchise. right now, people don't want to pay more for more stuff that's not a priority and street, especially elsewhere for free, that is the situation with cnn and i think we see it with netflix and they don't want to pay more for it. guy: somewhere jeff tucker is

hanging out and he's got to be thinking what's? this was my parting gift to this network he steered in choppy waters to editorial choices and now he's out and it's gone it escalated quickly as they set. >> that's absolutely the case and pretty soon we will see brian stelter hanging out as well but i'm not one to stand on grace too much, i've been on the receiving end of the network launching and getting cold feet immediately when things are not going well superfast and that stings but the case of cnn plus was always built on an even ground, they have an unpopular brand with the majority of the public's trust it so having people pay for that service never made sense. i am glad to seek discovery try

to drag cnn toward mott nonpartisan ground, i think it will be good for the network. i will say on record, i like watching their coverage of foreign war, that's something i like watching. guy: it's amazing -- >> they can do more and cnn, they can do a good job but nobody wants to see brian stelter. guy: great work guys, thank you for dropping by. we'll be right back. ♪♪ to be strong. to overcome anything. ♪ ♪ who's your rock? we hit the bike trails every weekend shinges doesn't care. i grow all my own vegetables shingles doesn't care.

we've still got the best moves you've ever seen good for you, but shingles doesn't care. because 1 in 3 people will get shingles, you need protection. but, no matter how healthy you feel, your immune system declines as you age increasing your risk for getting shingles. so, what can protect you? shingrix protects. you can protect yourself from shingles with a vaccine proven to be over 90% effective. shingrix is a vaccine used to prevent shingles in adults 50 years and older. shingrix does not protect everyone and is not for those with severe allergic reactions to its ingredients or to a previous dose. an increased risk of guillain-barré syndrome was observed after getting shingrix. fainting can also happen. the most common side effects are pain, redness, and swelling at the injection site, muscle pain, tiredness, headache, shivering, fever, and upset stomach. ask your pharmacist or doctor about shingrix. shingles doesn't care. but you should.

♪ ♪ wow, we're crunching tons of polygons here! what's going on? where's regina? hi, i'm ladonna. i invest in invesco qqq, a fund that gives me access to the nasdaq-100 innovations, like real time cgi. okay... yeah... oh. don't worry i got it! become an agent of innovation with invesco qqq >> thanks so much for watching the show, please

follow kennedy on instagram, check out my show. guy benson show. podcast is always free. good night from new york. >> oil. lifeblood of modern society this black stuff fuels our every day lives in ways he could scarcely imagine. without it the world as we know it wouldn't be. >> there is nothing anywhere that doesn't have a part of oil in it. to get it out of the grounds can be tricky, it takes patience, long hours, a whole lot of hard