you've been watching "the evening edit" and we really appreciate you joining us tonight. that does it for us. we hope you have a good evening and join us again tomorrow night. kennedy: ladies and gentlemen, the vulture has landed and house speaker nancy pelosi in taiwan despite china's warnings to stay away. the speaker and five other members of congress flew to the capitol, the city of taipei, after stopping in malaysia and singapore yesterday after the tour. pelosi said, "our visit is one of several congressional delegations to taiwan and it in no way contradicts long standing united states policy guided by the taiwan relations act of

1979". "u.s. china communicates fixed assurances". the united states continues to oppose unilateral efforts ". the chinese ambassador had this to say today. watch with me. >> we will take whatever we can to respond and protect to send out our sovereignty area and our response will be very full, strong, and forceful. kennedy: national security council coordinator john kirby said there's no need for this little trip to escalate to something more. john. >> there's no reason as i said yesterday for beijing to turn this visit, which is consist with long standing u.s. policy and some sort of crisis. or use it as a pretext to

increase aggressiveness and military activity in or around the taiwan straight. now or beyond terrific travel. kennedy: oh, so what happens now? let's get into with it with tonight's party panel. we have board member and risk adviser managing director, jason meister is here and fox news contributor and my favorite book marie huff and foundation for economic education and writer and uberty activist and been in my backyard, olivia joins the show. >> yes, i have. kennedy: jason, let us begin. i think this is a win for freedom. there's a lot of stuff that nancy pelosi says and does that i don't like. i do like this trip. why is it splitting the democrat party and the establishment? >> okay. well, kennedy, i actually disagree here with you.

i don't believe this is a trip that nancy pelosi is taking to stand up to the ccp, the chinese communist party or to protect the sovereignty of the people of taiwan. i think it's either an influence penalty operation or pr stunt with very grave consequences. china has made it very clear that they don't want us in taiwan. and nancy pelosi is doing it at a time when we're in a recession with inflation levels not seen since the 1970s. so naturally we'll start two confrontations, simultaneously, with nuclear powers after wasting two decades and trillions of dollars on failed wars. i think nancy pelosi is putting the world, not just america and taiwan, but the world in a perilous situation, and i think china will respond. they have no reason to rush that response and wait the 12 hours or whatever for her to leave taiwan. and they'll slowly tighten the noose around taiwan's neck as a result of this trip. kennedy: your supreme leader donald trump disagrees with you.

jason, i like you and think you're incredibly smart, but you sound like a lib. marie, you're supposed to be the liberal. maybe you can speak to freedom here. nancy pelosi, she's off base on 85% of what she says and does, but she has been an avowed anti-chinese activist for a long time. i respect that. who dropped the dime on her trip? who leaked this trip because that is the national security concern? >> that's a good question and you're right, she has been a friend of taiwan for a very long time and an anti-china activist and the chinese government doesn't get to tell our senior leaders where they go. i would love to know who put this out publicly giving the chinese government time to get ready for this. look, the idea that the united states should not stand by taiwan as china has been really upping the pressure on them for

many months. notes just in the last few days but china has been cracking down on taiwan for many, many months and the idea they'd trying to use nancy pelosi to do so further is this crazy pretext for escalation. they shouldn't take it. this is long standing u.s. policy, and i think the chinese government is looking for a fight here so if escalation happens, it's not nancy pelosi's fault, it's the chinese government's fault and a lot of people across the political spectrum, and a lot of republicans and even you, kennedy, agreeing with nancy pelosi on this move. kennedy: i'm not a republican or democrat but i love freedom. >> you're in a different category, that's why. kennedy: i love people who stand up for it. from your perspective, what is going on here and does this make things better or worse in the region? >> so i actually agree with bits and pieces of what all of you are saying. it is very true that pelosi has been an anti-china activist for upwards of 30 years so possibly

one of the only things i'd agree with her on that. i am worried as a libertarian leaning person that this may bang on the war drums a little bit, and it may be true that china was already going to escalate tensions with taiwan prior to nancy pelosi's visit, i don't know. but i know that war hawks in the u.s. will look at this as an example to go to war with china or make the argument, and i'm not ready to go to war with a nuclear superpower. kennedy: no, that's a really bad idea, but i think you can make the case that it is okay to be unpredictable with china. it's okay to not telegraph your every move. it's also okay to not appease them at every turn. you can do all of those things. they're not tamping out to a declaration of war. they're the hot talk and scrambling planes and going to shoot her down and fire and fury awaiting the speaker if she dare touches foot on our sovereign land.

that frankly was bluster so nancy will come and go and i don't think it's going to upset the status quo. thank you very much. i didn't mean to rhyme but now we're on time. party panel, don't go anywhere. u.s. and taiwan on iowa hawkeyes high alert as chinese warships are positioned on the east side of the island and china preparing to conduct more live fire drills on all sides of the country. that's fun. and chinese war planes flying close to the median line dividing the taiwan straight. is nancy pelosi safe or will china take action? there's only one war hero i'd like to talk to in studio, retired marine sergeant and fox news contributor joey jones is with maine break it down for me. i stand by you can do these things and make a show of support. it doesn't mean your saber rattling or asking for war. your thoughts? >> china is the most consist

adversary we've ever had and fought them in korea and vietnam and other places laos, cambodia or wherever and not just their stretch of communist and stretch of manifest destiny we implemented here has been a problem for a really long time and there's been an interest in taiwan for a long time too and not always for the same reasons, and i guess my concern is it now more than ever if not both parties, our government, should be lock and step in how we're responding to china and i don't understand what partisan issues would divide our government leaders on china. i can see maybe with ukraine. i can see maybe with nato as a whole the way trump came in and disrupted nato, but when it comes to china, i don't understand other than our economic globalists, i don't understand what the schism is among our parties with how to deal with china. what we're looking at now is a schism among the leaders of the

democratic party. there's an administration that seems very much in opposition to how really probably the most powerful democrat, nancy pelosi because she can raise the most money, is treating this issue or how active she wants to be as opposed to the administration and as a american, that gives me concern. if china has 100 year policy, can we not get a four year policy together? can we not get a multiple term or couple presidents in a row that see this as a priority and tackle it that way. if we're going to have bureaucrats leeching in government for decades at a time, could they serve us on this? come together for this? this isn't a new problem. there's nothing really all that new about it other than perhaps china feels what they're more in power and have some position of leverage and i heard people talk on the network we have positions of leverage through economy and other places and i understand that, but when somebody acts out the way china has, generally speaking they do it from two positions, either disparity or leverage, and i don't see china in a place of disparity and i

understand they have a presidential election coming up and that kind of thing going on, but i don't feel like china is moving and posturing, which this is posturing, from a position of disparity. regularly americans probably don't even understand the one china policy. you know, i had to take classes on it to really understand it. we have talked out both sides of our mouth -- kennedy: should we abandoned the one china policy? >> i think it probably would have made sense a few decades ago but at this point, i don't know that we can. we have taken our position and held it and have to make it make sense. that's what we have to co. what we have to do now is say, what is our relationship with china and how does that even with taiwan? kennedy: to your point, china and the united states, obviously they feel a lot -- steal a lot from us in terms of intellectual property and academic espionage. >> and we do nothing about it. kennedy: we really do nothing about it and that's because americans and american corporations want economic

prosperity, but you should be able to have those things while still holding onto a philosophical consistency. i don't think that's too much to ask for from what you're talking about. there may be a difference in where you allot resources, but none of that adds up to a hot war for either side. that benefits zero people. >> the sad truth is, we send american businessmen and women to china and they go to what's called pap list economic zones that china create that had mimic the capitalism we enjoy. that's where american corporations go and what they see when they visit and what they invest in. they don't see behind the curtain with thousands of children in a sweat shop producing that capitalist -- that capitalist investment. if we go to vietnam or taiwan or other places in asia and indo pacific and try to make that same investment, we don't have the same return because we don't have the same aauthoritarian communist government and we're absolutely allowing our businesses to benefit from what

china does wrong while on the other side saying it's wrong. and until that changes or something changes and we accept china for what it is or tell taiwan since 1979, we didn't have to defend you and i hope what our government asks for is what we get which is posturing to a point and leave it there. the fact we don't combat the way they steal our intellectual property or just the fact we don't invest our own cyber security than we have in the last 15 years is a problem. kennedy: that's shocking. even the last four years the fact we haven't made a concerted effort to beef up our national cyber security. you know, just for china, not to mention russia, north korea. i would even put turkey on that list. >> $1.2 trillion in infrastructure. i would have been okay if i knew it would secure our digital footprint. kennedy: infrastructure is people like soil and green. thank you, joey.

>> thank you. kennedy: thank you for your service. >> yes, ma'am. i appreciate. kennedy: the democrats speeding faster than paul pelosi and a school zone. is anyone buying biden's no new taxes malarkey? streaming live tomorrow morning at 11:00 a.m. eastern. maria bartiromo hosts the border crisis live from the front line in texas. watch it all. stay with us.

every search you make, every click you take, every move you make, every step you take, i'll be watching you. the internet doesn't have to be duckduckgo is a free all in one privacy app with a built in search engine,

web browser, one click data clearing and more stop companies like google from watching you, by downloading the app today. duckduckgo: privacy, simplified. kennedy: watch this, nailed it. the democrats continue to gaslight america senate republicans raising the alarm over the democrat's so called inflation reduction act like inflation increasing inflation act. citing the nonpartisan joint committee on taxation report that showed the only thing the bill will reduce is the cash in our wallets. but today, senator joe mansion joined fax news and flat out deny that had, cause he has to. watch. >> i'm saying americans, $400,000 and below now are going to be taxed. >> that's whereon. that's a lie. that is a pure outright lie. >> so their taxes are not going to go up? >> not at all. kennedy: we're just closing loopholes, that's all. with senator mansion just lying straight to our faces, what's in

it for him? joining me now is california republican congressman and house judiciary member, welcome back. >> kennedy, one of the funny things is a revenue increase to the government is by definition a tax increase and i don't know how anyone can spin it differently and they can't have the revenue and claim it came somehow from thin air. kennedy: yes, because that's what it is. you're shifting money from point a to point b and unfortunately it is being taken from taxpayers and it is going to the government so that does nothing to tackle inflation and that doesn't decrease demand at all and it really doesn't affect the supply so is joe mansion lying when he says it doesn't increase taxes? is that political cya for him? >> i'm sorry that he said to harris that it was a lie because he was mistaken, and i know that in his heart he's not a liar,

but he's certainly saying things that aren't true. this new stimulus spending including the obama care extension and so on clearly going to continue with inflation and nothing in this bill is going to make our supply chains work better, give us more oil, lower the price of energy. it's not going to do any of the things that the american public knows are our problems and oh, by the way, it's going to take money out of your wallet and worse than that and this is the hidden tax, it's going to likely increase the cost of your bill at albertsons or stater brothers or wherever you shop because it's those low margin businesses they say they're closing a loophole but creating a minimum tax on entities that work on 2 or 3% margins. kennedy: yes, that 3% margin because people that make less than $10,000 a year, they will actually see a 3% tax increase thanks to this plan, which according to mitch mcconnell

will also raise inflation in the short term so any benefits we might see from it won't come for a decade. i don't think voters are willing to wait around that long, but i want to talk about, you know, some intrigue because historically, joe mansion and kirstin cinema, one from a red state and one from a purple state, they've worked in concert with one another. joe mansion decided to author some of the legislation, work on it on his own, and we haven't heard anything from senator cinema. what does that say to you about where her head is at with some that could upset lower income earner in her state of arizona? >> well, i think she's trying to work on the impact of the studies and the like and hopefully she'll remain the independent that at times in the house and senate she's been. one of the challenges for joe is that everything he said he wouldn't do, he is now doing and

redefining it. that's the challenge. you can't just change the terms. the same as you can't say two quarters of contraction isn't a recession. you know, these terms are there for a reason, they've been there for a long time. in joe's case, bless his heart, i've known him for a long time, he's literally saying that which he said was bad is now good, and that's not going to bode well in the long run for him. i'm hoping that arizona is a state that knows what's bad is bad. kennedy: all right. so where do we go from here? if this does in fact make it through and if all the democrat senators stay healthy from covid, which they have not recently, you know, what does this do to the economy? >> well, what it does is it continues the wrong direction and doesn't get us in the right direction. getting people back to work, getting our efficiency back, those are the things we need to do and the american people can do it to be honest if the government will get back to

doing its job and if federal employees will show up and do their jobs rather than trying to work from home. you know, in the peak spl view, i'm defending championuating but for a reason and in the previous section, you talked about taiwan and agreed that what speaker pelosi is doing is generally right. you're absolutely right. the fact is that we're in ukraine because we showed weakness about our position on ukraine and the comparative free people. if we show that same weakness, all we do is eliminate the ability for taiwan to be a model for the rest of china for where they should be going rather than where they are. you know, would i prefer that speaker pelosi send a delegation than going herself maybe? that might have been a better idea but just as when newt gingrich went there, sending a message that people who live in freedom under a system that quite frankly china could switch to if they would give up this dictatorship is the right

answer, and as long as that model exists, there's hope for the rest of china. kennedy: yes, and the people of taiwan know that at least someone in leadership in the united states government is looking out for them and protecting freedom. it's not always nancy pelosi. she's doing the right thing now. we'll see what happens in the future. thank you so much congressman issa. >> thank you for standing for freedom yourself. kennedy: always, hot freedom, baby. you know what we do here. coming up, tackling pantsuit kamala harris lost american voters and is the liberal media turning on her as well? companies bending over backwards for gen z and the perks they were offering. panel returns to discuss. they're coming up next.

kennedy: great balls of fire. all right, vice president kamala harris is not on fire.

she's cooled off and failing so badly even the liberal media is starting to notice. a new york magazine piece titled the kamala conundrum notes, 18 months in thanks to accommodation of biden's age and unpopularity the punishing inflation is relentless opposition and most visibly her own struggles to communicate satisfactory woo for herself and reached an unperilous low point. that's a run on sentence. she has a 35.5% rating. has she reached the point of no return? the party panel is back. jason meister, olivia rondo and marie. is this what mutiny looks like, jason? >> it sure does. look, it's nearly impossible for any u.s. politician, democrat or republican to compete with joe biden's poll numbers but somehow kamala harris is able to achieve it.

many people forget though she was polling at about 5% when dropping out of the democratic primary and the truth of the matter is no one likes kamala. that's what you're seeing these poll numbers. she prefers and has more interest in talking about her pronouns than putting in the hard work on things like the southern border, which she was supposed to be taking care of. that's the problem here is she was complaining about donald trump on the campaign trail. that's easy, but governing and executing solutions for the american people, she's just not equipped for that. kennedy: and i don't think it's enough, marie, that she's out grand standing about abortion. that's an incredibly divisive issue ask she could unite the country with a solid immigration policy and it could be a little further left than a lot of republicans want to go, but it could be good for the country and our relationship with mexico and other central american

countries, but i want to know this from you, marie, who is the worst vice president, quail or kamala harris? >> dick cheyney? can i write in anti-seek stories? kennedy: that was not one of the choices. we can't free style on the show. >> i like the vice president and a lot of people like the vice president. i think it's a really tough job no matter who has it. it's a thankless job in many ways. what's been challenging for her is that she's taken on a number of really tough issues without easy answers. do i wish there was an easy solution to the border crisis? of course, we all do. with congress doing absolutely nothing, i think she's dug into that issue as trying to make progress. she's dealing with a bunch of really difficult issues and, you know, i would actually like to see her out there more talking about some of the issues that

are her bread and butter and having her out there talking about abortion is quite effective because there's a lot of women not just democrats, who are really mad and she taps into some of that emotion when she talks about this issue. i like her being out there on that. kennedy: half the country is already dead set against you when you come out and you're too too vociferously proabortion. you're not going to win critical mass by just talking about abortion. she can't talk about inflation. she is physically and intellectually incapable of talk about inflation. i don't think she knows what it is. i think that economic issues are her kryptonite so where do we go from here, olivia, because people are really worried about the job joe biden is doing. kamala harris is consistently polling lower and new york magazine, which should be a friend of the vice president is talking about her staff turnover, her salad and uncomfortable cackling and just bumbling on some of the issues,

which aren't gimmieses but at least she should be trying. >> the best thing that the right can do right now is let her bumble on. her own people don't like her like you said, she has a huge staff turnover rate. the fact of the matter is even democrats are starting to turn against her because she's just an unlikable person, and a horrible track record as a prosecutor prior to running for president. i mean, i'll be the one to say it since i can't be called racist for it but this is what happens when you make a big deal of announcing a quo tafanely or type of goal to hire an woman of color instead of focusing on credentials or personality or work ethic. this is literally the result of that. and i think her doing what she does, which is basically nothing, is the best gift that anyone could give to the right right now. kennedy: yes, and unfortunately it harms other women of co-larra because, you know, you want to do an exceptional job no matter who you are or what your background is, and then when you have these incredible victories

people go, oh my gosh, she also happens to have these characteristics. this is great for everyone. but that's -- that wasn't the priority and i think in the long run, it does hurt other women and it certainly hurts other women of color. while kamala is desperate for higher approval ratings and businesses are desperate for gen z workers and some of the companies shelling out sweet perks, free therapy, unlimited paid time off. unlimited, wow. bring your dog to workdays. i love that. four day workweeks, even chances to work remotely out of houses in the hamptons. is that enough to get gen z off the couch and into the workplace? could it lead to work force full of spoiled softies in jason? >> i think this is the terrible and disaster for generation z. they need to get back into the office, they need to collaborate with human beings. i think, you know, this idea of

a four day workweek, remote work, these are the things that we don't want to do in america when you have stagnant wage growth, you have inflation at raging levels that we haven't seen since the 19 70s, we're in a recession. these people don't have savings, they don't have assets. they need to be going to work and collaborating with human beings and not computers and i pads and cell phones. they need to be with people, collaborating five days a week in the office working. kennedy: so, how important is it to feel good versus being productive, marie? i think that's kind of the ultimate question because, you know, there's been so much emphasis on how do you feel? do you feel good? do you want to work from home? would that make you feel good? versus what is our bottom line and are we meeting our objectives. >> well, i think many studies have shown when we have better work/life balance or feel like we're able to take care of our families and do all of these things, we're more productive so i don't think it's neither or

here but look, we have had unprecedented job growth while a lot of economic indicators are not good, we do have jobs that are being created and people taking them in many cases, and i think many of the companies that are doing the best are the ones coming out of covid that have said, we don't have to tie you to your desk from 9-5 five days a week. we can make your life a little nicer and maybe you'll be more loyal to us and work harder for us. those are the companies that are actually doing really well. we should look at some of the perks, four day workweeks or whatever. i think we should look at them. kennedy: google tried that and have something like 14% of work force can work remotely nonstop, most employees at the company have to go in at least three day as week, but alphabet is really upset because their productivity has gone down 13% so they have placated an entire generation of workers and it's not working out for them. so, olivia, you actually are gen z so you get the last word

on this. >> so as a gen zer who does majority of the time work from home, i kind of see both sides of the issue. i think my job would see cushy to some people doing political strategy and journalism, but i'm very weary of what i like to call corporate propaganda and tiktok and instagram and my job lets me eat snacks at work to bring my dog to work and stay late. they're doing this so you're at your desk all the time. i kind of reject the notion that these corporations are actually interested in us having a healthy work/life balance. they're actually blurring the lines between work and life. you're going to live your work. you're going to live at work so by bringing work home, they're accomplishing that as well. also corporations don't do anything that's not going to help their bottom line so i would never fall into the trap that a company really cares about me just because they're letting me work at home, you know. kennedy: no, and that's probably the best point i've heard on it

is the blurring of the lines. you know, if you're working from home and if you're enjoying these perks, you are to be accessible 24 hour as day, seven day as week. you are going to have bosses and managers e-mailing you, expecting you to respond wherever you are if you're working from wherever you want. so, you know, the one thing about working in an office with a set amount of hours is you can clock out. like you are there, you should be expected to be focused but then, you know, when you leave, you can shutoff your work brain. but that is not the case with this reimagined paradigm and you're very brilliant for pointing that out. olivia, there's some good gen zers who will at some point rule the world and push our wheelchairs hopefully not right off a cliff. party panel, you're amazing and exceptional, wonderful, brilliant and delightful. jason, marie, and olivia, thank

you all. >> thank you. kennedy: coming up, primary election polls closing in michigan for a highly contested governor's race. who will they pick to face off against gretchen whitmer in the general? we have all the answers, next.

kennedy: that was last night's song and the winner was moose. meanwhile the republican primary race is on in michigan to decide who will take on democrat incumbent governor gretchen whitmer and also an alleged

murder and five candidates compete and on friday president bind gave his support. dickson is a establishment rhino and is that true and any republican stand a chance against the wicked witch of the midwest. joining me from michigan, he's a current author, journalist, pulitzer prize winner and charlie. welcome back. >> good to see you, kennedy. kennedy: who stands the best chance against gretchen whitmer and does donald trump's endorsement of tutor dickson matter? >> the polls close in 15 minutes so whatever wins tonight has the blood test chance. my guess is it would be tutor dickson and the funny thing about tru trunsst

wawaike like ari ask a ma ngelppor f ging oinndnd llinging 1%% a peallea nt runner, he came carhehe out at the last hour. but what a scene michigan has been because the two front runners before her were wiped out for turning in thousands of fake signatures so that's michigan for you. kennedy: that is michigan and it's a strange place politically and incredibly important for presidential contests. there's another contest, congressional seat held by peter meyer. democrats have been pouring so much money into his primary competitor john gibbs. tell me about that race. >> pete o'meyer, he's from the west side of the state and he's a vet and heir to the grocery store fortune and he voted for gun control and he voted for gay

marriage, and he voted to impeach donald trump. so one of tram's former, you know, henchmen moves back to michigan to run against meyer. the democrats, the democrats are running adds calling trump's guy too conservative. that way all the trump conservatives are definitely going to vote for him because the democrats don't want to take on moderate peter meyer. it's really interesting. kennedy: and meyer, he's been on the show many times, combat veteran, thoughtful congressman -- >> good dude. kennedy: yeah, i like him. he took a seat in a very specific district, politically dissimilar to a lot of the country and dis-thinkers there. talib, will she get voted out of office because of redistricting there? >> that's the whole thing with peter meijer, that very conservative seat on the west side is 50/50 and democrats can

flip it. talib moved out of her district to the new district and large arab american population, and we had four democratic congresswomen move to new districts where they could get elected because their neighbors won't vote for them. that's what a freak zone michigan is, yeah. kennedy: how do you see this shaking out? >> well, it could be in terms of the congressional seats, the first time in 70 years that detroit doesn't send a black representative to congress. and it will be whitmer who with her war chest and the democrat's piling money in here maybe $75 million, she's probably up 10% on tudor dixon right now but tudor hasn't spent any money and if you're within 10% of a not so popular governor and remind them about covid and the reason the books are balanced in michigan is because of the fake biden money, you might have a real race but right now, $75 million,

kennedy, that's a lot of dough. you yeah, but she has to remind voters about what whitmer did, just like andrew cuomo here in new york, lied about people who died in the virus. >> right. kennedy: shame on her, always interesting, charlie. thanks for keeping us up to date on this fascinating michigan race. >> thanks for having me on. kennedy: always. and the topical storm is next.

this is xfinity rewards. our way of showing our appreciation. with rewards of all shapes and sizes. [ cheers ] are we actually going? yes!! and once in a lifetime moments.

two tickets to nascar! yes! find rewards like these and so many more in the xfinity app. millions have made the switch from the big three to xfinity mobile. that means millions are saving hundreds a year on their wireless bill. and all of those millions are on the nation's most reliable 5g network, with the carrier rated #1 in customer satisfaction. that's a whole lot of happy campers out there. and it's never too late to join them. get unlimited data with 5g included for just $30 a line per month when you get 4 lines. switch to xfinity mobile today.

kennedy: a new study of graphic novels claims that since the 1940s, the breast of female comic book characters have gotten 300% bigger, but they're still not as big as the breasts on male comic book fans. that's a growing fan base and this is the topical storm. you can still motor boat a fella. topic number one. amazon delivery truck led california police on a high speed freeway chase before crashing into three cars but still the worst amazon car crash is michelle obama podcast. this helicopter video shows the out of control truck speeding down the wrong side of california freeway with police in hot pursuit and the whole

time alexa was cracking jokes and talking about the weather. of course this is a carjacker driving the truck. the real amazon delivery driver was busy paying on your lawn and watching the ipad you ordered. after crashing into several cars, the driver fled on foot and was cornered and caught by police and charged with attempted murder. home invasion robbery, carjacking, assault with a deadly weapon, wreckly evading of police and suspicious driving under the influence and the only charge he's not face asking shipping, prime member. topic number two, former skating superstar tony hawk teaming up with hot wheels to create a line of tiny skate boards for your fingers. that's right, even skate boards are going digital these days. talk about trick-flation. the new tony hawk finger boards and the perfect way to learn fundamentals of skate bored with all the fun and no risk. it make it is easy to perform

finger boarding tricks. some say they're the most satisfying finger tricks since picking your nose and buy skating ramps and skate park sets for $29.99 american dollars and hot wheels givers you the finger. if you're a first timer, don't sweat it, there's tutorial videos online to teach you all the best finger boarding moves and for more ideas on what to do with your fingers, check out the hunter biden laptop videos. topic number three, columbian pop star supra aural headphones key ragaini is facing eight years in prison for tax evasion. nothing happens when your hips don't lie but accountant does. shakira nailed to pay $15 million in party taxes from 2012-2014 and seeking a fine of $24.5 million. those greedy son of a gunnedder sons. luckily she's got one of the world's most shakeable moneymakers and shakira listed

the bahamas during her official residence during those years for, wink, tax purposes. prosecutors say she was in fact secretly living in spain in other words she's just a beautiful liar and now shakira rejected a settlement offer and her case will go to trial and she hopes a jury will award her all the things she deserves for being such a good girl, honey. topic number four, god, this is gross. apple bees is selling lip gloss that tastes and smells like chicken wings. it's amazing because they can barely get their chicken wings to taste like chicken wings. it comes in four shades, get me hot buffalo, sweet chili kiss, be my honey pepper and honey barbecue. the chain restaurant created a song to promote the lip gloss called taste my face, which is

also what elizabeth chambers said to army hammer on their wedding night. let's watch the video together. >> i hope you like it spicey because i'm hot sauce gloss. wait, let me taste the gloss first. come on over, kiss my face. you know want to taste my face. you need you need to taste my face. i know you want what i got. >> taste my face. kennedy: yeah, the guys are like barf in my mouth. the competition -- with competition like that, i think john rich will have a tough time holding on to the number one song for too much longer. unlike that taste lessoning, the saucy gloss is totally full of flavor and completely mcicks the real applebee's advertiser and guaranteed to make your man boneless. use the #ticklemetuesday.

here we go, why don't clowns -- sorry, why don't sharks eat clowns? why don't sharks eat clowns?

>> it's time for tickle me tuesday. here is the ticket. why don't sharks eat clowns? because they taste funny.

>> was that the joke? that was great, yeah. >> thanks jason, jd, janet, mark worthington they got to right, thank you for watching the best hour of your day. follow me. blah, blah, blah. blah blah. if you could get this done, you got the one thing that everybody in the world wants. >> an all out race to light up the night. >> it opened the world. >> they went out the window. >> shrewd businessmen. >> inventor of the ages. >> and determination. >>be the number of things they tried is astonishing. >> he had faith. >> the battle of the bulb and the war that fol