riots are wrong. that they shouldn't have happen? >> yeah, 100% but the same crimes have to be equally applied. liz: congressman, thank you for joining us. i'mless macdonald on "the evening edit". thank you for watching and we hope you have a good evening and join us again tomorrow night. kennedy: finally details and attorney general merrick garland explaining his spotted on the raid and he claimed he was the one that ultimately signed off on the operation. merrick. merrick: first, i personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant in this matter. second, the department does not take such a decision lightly. where possible, it is standard practice to seek less inintrusive means as an alternative to a search and to

narrowly scope any search that is undertaken. kennedy: so why the hell didn't you do that? his statement now opening up a completely different can of worms and here's why, he personally approved this decision to seek a search warrant and does that mean this whole thing was his idea? only one person above him and that's the current president of the united states. did the president sign off on the paperwork and if not, then whose idea was it? the other issue, garland was president obama's supreme court nominee, remember that? he is president biden's ag. so he's seen as being very political and today he claimed he is completely impartial. malarkey. merrick: faithful adherence to the rule of law is the bedrock of the justice department and our democracy. upholding the rule of law means applying the law evenly without fear or favor. under my watch, that is

precisely what the justice department is doing. kennedy: using their might as a political battering ram. the attorney general also said the doj filed a motion to unseal the warrant so we can all see it and the former president can publicly release his own copy and president trump is doing what he does best, airing grievances on social. he said "my attorneys and representatives are cooperating fully and very good relationships were established. the government could have had whatever they wanted if we had it. they asked us to put an additional lock on certain areas. done. everything was fine. better than that of most previous presidents and then out of nowhere with no warning, mar-a-lago was raided at 6:30 in the morning by very large numbers of agents and even safe crackers. they got way ahead of themselveses ". but who's winning the pr battle here and has the justice department done enough to explain their actions?

meet the party panel. it's a good one. we have attorney and republican strategist alexander wilks. we have strategist and biden campaignist and surrogate and comedian and host part of the problem podcast and he may have a thing or two to say about this himself. alexander, i will start with you. there's a lot of legal questions here and merrick garland a lot of times seems surprised he's the attorney general and acts as though he needs permission from someone to say anything when really it's up to him. why so much stone walling and silence? it was a very short briefing and he took no questions. >> i think this shows weakness on the part of the doj in this matter and it's led to a lot of confusion out there. you know, it leads me to believe that really this is an example

of washington bubble thinking where they don't understand just how much significance something like this would hold to a lot of americans out there and how jarring this would be. there were just no plan to keep this tight and controlled and measured as a law enforcement agency you want to take the temperature down on something. not ratchet it up and when there's no information being provided, when everyone is just watching the same live footage of a dark mar-a-lago being surrounded by guys with machine guns, people will have questions. of course on the legal matters, we're not going to know anything till we see the warrant and underlying affidavit but till then, they should have made more of an effort to carefully release this information leading me to believe that merrick garland may not have known what was going on. kennedy: how could that be? he's the attorney general. this is a former president.

this isn't roger stone, kevin. this is the former president of the united states. if it were a former democrat president, there's absolutely no way there would have been this show of force and this much personnel to get boxes of records. kennedy: -- >> kennedy, listen, the attorney general said today in response of what we saw on monday from mar-a-lago reinforcing the indense of the judiciary that he was the sign off as the attorney general for this search of mar-a-lago. it was not the [inaudible] moving in and they were moving in as the fbi and semperring the compound. you said this weekend and i have said let's release the warrant and get that information out there. that's what he -- kennedy: and the affidavit. >> that's what he intended to do. absolutely, i want to see all the underlining documentation

but starting with the warrant, which hopefully we'll see tomorrow. kennedy: yes, by 3:00 p.m. the ag has said that. >> let's hope. kennedy: dave, we're getting wrapped up in particulars and losing sight of what's really problematic here. >> absolutely. for merrick garland to say, look, the fbi, we just faithfully execute the law. that's it. there's no politicization going on here. i mean, this is absurd. look, think about the crimes that former presidents have committed. barack obama himself when asked about whether he would prosecute the george w. bush administration, he said, look, we tortured some folks but we have to move forward. we can't look back ward. there was no one in the fbi saying, well, hey, look, we faithfully, behindly enforce the law so we're going to go start rounding up all the bush administration officials. and barack obama himself as donald trump said, you know, he said it kind of sloppily

creating isis but obama knowingly did fund isis in syria. that's literal treason but the fbi didn't say we have to enforce the laws so are you telling me there's some crime here that donald trump committed that is so much more egregious than the crimes of previous presidents? or is it possible that this same fbi, who as andrew mccabe said in his 60 minutes interview that the department of justice was determined to bring down donald trump and thought about invoking the 25th amendment and settled on sicking a special prosecutor on him. i think most americans know what's going on here, except the very, very brainwashed progressives who think donald trump was some unique evil on this country. the idea that the fbi is not politicized, they have been politicized from day one. they were used in world war i to spy on antiwar activists who wooodroe wilson used and spy on civil rights leaders. this is nothing new.

aside from what modern republican voters like to think like they just became politicized during the trump administration, this is the entire history of the fbi and should never be given the benefit of the doubt and should be abolished. kennedy: they're not given the benefit of the doubt but given more power and a clandestine way to operate so they can abuse that power with very, very little accountability as the surveillance states has been somewhat checked. the power of the fbi has only grown, and they have had so much missteps. this doesn't do anything to heel the reputational -- heal the reputational damage they've taken on with the missteps. i hope at some point -- and the only thing that's going to do it is a complete audit and a come up pence and getting rid of all senior leadership, tom mcclintock said that last night and we should do that across the

board with many areas of senior law enforcement but we need to start with the fbi. the question on everybody's mind, is there a rat in trump's inner circle. the raid was based on classify information from an inside source. a federal law enforcement tells fox that probable cause for the warrant likely came from a secret service agent. i said it today on outnumbered. the former white house chief of staff nick mulvaney said the tipster could be closer to trump than we think. >> it would be somebody very close inside the president and my guess is there's probably six or eight people with that kind of information. i don't know the people on the inside circle these days so i can't give any names of folks who come to mind, but your instinct is a good one. if you know where the safe is and that documents are in ten boxes in the basement, you are pretty close to the president. kennedy: is there a leaker on the loose? who could it be? that's what i said.

the secret service let the fbi in. the fbi didn't have to have a battalion of armed agents when the secret service is keeping that residence safe. you know, obviously the secret service, they are sworn officers. they wear to uphold the -- swear to uphold the constitution. they're not going to let donald trump run around with plans to overtake the united states with the help of russia. so who could it possibly be? alexandra? >> it's this type of speculation creating the confusion out there and so angering to so many americans and the litany of scandals we have seen not really play out or fizzle out like the russia investigation for example. i think there's a real feeling on the part of a lot of americans that the former president is just kind of constantly under attack. that he is constantly under

siege from people, whether it was people who worked in the bureaucratic parts of the government trying to divert his agenda or even the justice department was looking into his campaign. there's, i think, a legitimate feeling on the part of many of americans out there that he has been under attack, and i think that then when you look at measures like the inflation reduction act, which just hired 87,000 new irs agents. many americans are feeling completely unnerved thinking about, well, if the federal government can go after a former president in this way and with such confusion and just such disarray, what does this mean for me who doesn't have access to the best lawyers in the world? who doesn't have access to the

best compliance. kennedy: i'm going to talk to darryl just a little bit about that, about the weaponnization. not only the department of justice and the fbi but the irs. we know that they have bullets. we know they have guns. we know what they're coming after. they're coming after the beginnings of your wealth. they want to take that away from you. that is a government taking. taxizationis theft. taxation is theft. dave, who could it have been? dave: i don't know. there's two groups: tom -p loyalists and the secret service. seems more likely to be the secret service but it not impossible it could have been a trump loyalist. i would say that i think it's a bit back ward to say, if they can do this to trump, they can do it to anybody. i think if they can do it to anybody, eventually they can do it to the former president of the united states. the truth is the irs and fbi and

all types of police departments throughout this country, they do this to regular people all the time. there's tens of thousands of swat raids every year in this country. it's -- for those people who have been through that, they have lived through totalitarianism and no one really cares except libertarians, i guess. no one cares till it's a high profile one. kennedy: absolutely right. they will occasionally publish stories about people who have been victims of civil asset forfeiture and i said that last night. that's essentially what this is looking like, but also if you're sort of reading between the lines here, kevin, i wouldn't want to go back to the white house if i was melania. i may call somebody and be like it's in my closet. go look in there. >> she didn't want to go to the white house the first time. i watched you on outnumbered this morning, kennedy, and i think you said you thought it was baron. i think it's tiffany trump.

my money is on tiffany down in mar-a-lago tipping somebody off. kennedy: the plat thickens and i'm going with baron and melania and maybe working in concert together for very, very different reasons. panel, go nowhere. it's game night and we're playing. this week's raid wasn't the former president's run in with the fbi since leaving office. fox news today learning the feds subpoenaed for documents back in june. he was reportedly cooperative and we're told he gave them documents. fast forward to this week's raid, why did the same fbi feel the need to barge into his home now? the attorney general even said, they use every other means necessary just shy of seizing documents. why didn't they do that this time? were they purposesly being heavy handed? joining me to discuss former fbi investigators bill daily. welcome to the show. >> hey, kennedy. kennedy: who got this wrong, the

fbi or dea? >> it's a loaded question. i don't know at this point who got what wrong. there's a lot of questions swirling out there and you mentioned about the subpoena back in june. you have to put this in context too. first of all, was the national archives, the archivists taking care of presidential records. who first asked for this information. they wanted these documents so, you know, i think perceiving that it was the fbi wanting the documents, that's probably not the case. what happened is from what i read is that the archivist then kind of made a criminal referral to department of justice saying they weren't getting what they wanted. that kind of invoked getting the fbi involved as part of the department of justice to kind of look at this and take some action. so, you know, what happened from june, whether there were conversations and what those conversations were. we're hearing both sides of the coin here, whether they were both cooperative and equal contention. kennedy: you're raiding somebody's house over archives?

that's not criminal. we know what criminal is. that's not the kind of criminal activity that excuses a raid like this, i'm sure there were a lot of agents there who they respect the constitution and they know this isn't right on its face. >> you know, interesting point in this is i'm not a lawyer and often try to speak like one. in one of the earlier fox programs, there was a former u.s. attorney that spoke about the presidential archives statute is not a criminal statute and there's no criminal penalties associated with it per se. therefore to get a search warrant kind of raises above that level to where as you were just talking with your other panelists, there were information that was provided. what that information was and was the predicate for the search warrant is really the crux here. i mean, was it something where somebody said, oh, go up and look under the mattress or look over here or in the safe that just arrived that happened to be empty, according to reports? what was it? at this point, we need to know

what that predicate was. who was saying what, was there somebody with some inside baseball there giving some direction as to what they should be looking for and was that what was used to get the search warrant? kennedy: if you're going to raid the home of a former president, there better be bodies. there has to be something more than cocktail napkins and menus. little replicas of air force one. i'm sorry, but that is not enough to justify this level of force. that is wrong. that's not how the justice department and the fbi should work. >> and certainly not, you know, in post-light of what happened with russia gate and this warrant. the bar is high and it should be high and we should have visibility into exactly how this search warrant came to be because it is causing a great amount of divisiveness in this country. it's causing upheaval between people that are very angst about this as you talked about a few

minutes ago and if it can happen to the president, it could happen to every day people and they're concerned about that, and i think this is where we really need to have some information come to light. it is a extenuating circumstance and maybe different from some other investigation where we need to have them come clean and tell us what it was that drove them to take this search warrant. kennedy: that's the only thing that will clean up some of these conspiracy that are bubbling up, and merrick garland raised, again, more questions than answers today. he didn't take any questions from the press. they need to be much more transparent about this, and it has to be really, really bad otherwise it is a current president who might run against a former president who was the target of an fbi raid by an attorney general who was thwarted from being on the supreme court. so this is so political at this point, it is nothing but and they've done nothing to clean

that up. all they've done is make trump a victim here. they have made him a martyr, and i don't think that was the intention because i do think the intention was to do as much representational and political harm as possible. that's not what the fbi is for. so they need a lot more than sham on them. they need to all just -- they need to be gone. we need to do away with a lot of nonsense. that's probably why you're a former fbi investigator because there's some problems. bill, thank you so much, and thank you for listening to me. you're a nice person. >> it was a great organization to work for from my experience. we'll leave it at that and maybe come back some other day and talk about it. kennedy: i know there's hard working fbi agents and great americans that work for the bureau. i know they work their asss off to keep this country safe and i know the bureau is used as a political tool to spy on people like, i don't know, parents at school board meetings. in concert with the doj and the white house. and i know that christopher wray

has not cleaned up that organization, and we're seeing that bare fruit right now. i'm scared for our country and i'm missed off at -- pissed off at the abuse of power and i've not heard an honest or satisfactory explanation of what went on and till i hear that, i'm going to keep railing and so is everyone else because we are fed up with it. bill, thank you so much. good to talk to you. >> thanks, kennedy. kennedy: coming up, good news for job hunters, bad news for taxpayers, the irs is hiring. you will need a relevant degree, a can-do attitude, and the ability to use deadly force. the hell are they preparing for? i'll get into a liberty loving congressman darryl issa is back.

millions have made the switch from the big three to xfinity mobile. that means millions are saving hundreds a year on their wireless bill. and all of those millions are on the nation's most reliable 5g network, with the carrier rated #1 in customer satisfaction. that's a whole lot of happy campers out there. and it's never too late to join them. get unlimited data with 5g included for just $30 a line per month when you get 4 lines. switch to xfinity mobile today.

kennedy: well, here's a question for you, why on earth do we need new irs agents and why do they need guns? according to a job posting by the irs, applicants are supposed to be criminal investigation special agents and they must be able to "carry a firearm and be willing to use deadly force if necessary". that's fun. this comes as the house is set

to vote opportunistic a bill tomorrow that would -- on a bill tomorrow that would add 87,000 new irs agents with nearly $80 billion in funding. how about sending 87,000 judges to the border to adjudicate some of the cases down there? so what is the irs gearing up for? joining me now california republican congressman and house judiciary committee member darryl issa. welcome back, sir. darryl: thanks for having me back, kennedy, and thanks for covering this massive taking of power and in the earl already segment, i appreciate -- earlier segment i appreciate the recognition of the liberty we lose every time the fbi and department of justice gain the ability to do what they want to do whether or not it's historically something they could or should do. kennedy: yes, i'm glad you brought that up because merrick garland said that he felt the need to speak because he had to -- and i'll read you his

quote, he said the recent unfounded attacks on the professionalism of the fbi and justice department, agents, and prosecutors, i will not stand by silently when their integrity is unfairly attacked. what about the liberty of americans that are unfairly attacked here? darryl: i'm going to be a little bit nuanced here for just a second. let's give the fbi a complete pass. they executed the warrants, but give the department of justice under the attorney general no pass. they made a decision to seek the warrant. they made the decision to take a common complaint about some paperwork that the president thinks he doesn't have to turn in perhaps, and the archivist wants every piece of paper. that sort of thing has never led to this kind of a raid and, oh, by the way, they didn't even go and get it for months when we were pointing out that there was a server, there was all this

data that hillary clinton had. you know what they did? they talked to the lawyers who had it in their possession. they didn't go and raid it. they never raided, and this was documentation that was illegally produced completely in violation of the law and of course it had classified information, and hillary clinton did not have the legal authority to declassify it and president trump every day of his presidency did. kennedy: yes, and hillary clinton, and i don't want people to forget this, her lawyer was also an adviser and a campaign adviser, and someone who was given immunity and enjoyed attorney-client privilege and had immunity from the federal government, and she was also the one person who was helping to decide which documents to destroy. you know, hillary clinton is being very cheeky putting out swag that says but her e-mails. it wasn't about her e-mails. it was about a secret server

where things could be abstracted from that and essentially trashed. now we've got 87,000 irs agents who are going to come after working class americans. there are too many of them and too few rich people. darryl: oh, absolutely. this is clearly going to be people in the middle class. as much as i'm worried about the 87,000, particularly those wielding guns, i'm more worried about the lowest learners behind them. the fact is that the irs has already weaponnized repeatedly and we've proven it and no one got fired. louis is enjoying her life and she's a criminal at the election commission and criminal at the irs and there's no price because she's a democrat criminal. kennedy: is there any chance the inflation reduction act, reduction, the opposite of

reduce, any chance that fails in the house? darrell: i believe every single republican will just vote know. if they all vote no, every democrat sans one or two would have to vote yes. do i think we can stop it? i any nancy pelosi would keep the vote open for five day ifs she got all the votes. if every republican shows up and votes yes, then we can hold them accountable for 87,000 irs agents for taking away your liberty, for increasing your taxes, and quite frankly for breaking promises that many of them made not to do exactly this. kennedy: yes, and nancy's son gets to enrich himself in taiwan with the shady deals. little hunter jr.. congressman issa, thank you for being here, appreciate it. >> thank you, kennedy. thanks for going for liberty. kennedy: you know it. all right, it is game night and we've got a great one for you

for all the scroodge mcduck wan that bees, lifestyle of the rich and famous and go bathe and we have something crazy they've bought or done and you can play along and win the party cash, next.

kennedy: it's time for life sometimes of the rich and shameless, the game where we learn outrebounded stars of show and screen and business businesses squander their shows and life. i'll read true stories of the rich and shameless. our panelists will guess who i'm talking about. whoever gets the most right will win a private island full of teslas. that's very exciting. however i'm disqualified since i have the answers. are you all ready? >> yeah. i'll take you to my island if i

win. >> kevin, you are the most romantic person i know. if only. >> i've always said that. kennedy: here we go. alex, question number one, which of these rich and shameless never own add pet tiger. mike tyson, chad ocho cinco johnson, or flav-a-flav. >> flav. kennedy: yeah, boi. you got that right. never inned a tiger. owned a tiger. kevin, your question, which of these rich and shameless once bought a $1,000lv teddy bear for her 1 month old baby. kyler ginner, jada pinkett-smith or hillary clinton. >> i want to say hillary but it's kylie, hopefully. kennedy: yeah, it's kylie. >> always going to be a jenner. kennedy: i can feel it being a

smash and grab. dave, here you go, question one, and of these rh and shameless once owned a $10,000 pair of shoe, mila kunis, celine dion, or ginger spice? >> celine dion. kennedy: yes, my heart will go on. that was a horrible accent. okay. here we go, alex, which of these rich and shameless once paid $55 million for a kentucky derby winning racehorse. microsoft cofounder paul allen, jay-z, or rosie o'donnel. look at rosie's face. >> going rosie. kennedy: that was the worst answer. she's the least likely and that's not true. it was actually jay-z. he has a lot of money. racehorses are expensive.

>> he has a big farm in new jersey. kennedy: he sure does. great big farm, lot of horses. here you go, kevin. which of these rich and shameless couples reportedly spent $110 million on their wedding. prince william and kate middleton? prince charles and princess diana. or chelsea clinton and whoever she's married to? >> oh, gosh. it's got to be -- he's name is mark. i don't know his last name. is it the most recent royal couple? >> william and kate would be the most recent. kennedy: think they spent more than charles and diana. >> yeah, i think so. kennedy: no, it was charles and diana. adjusted for today's dollars. it was like $75 billion. that's a lot of money. dave, which of these rich and shameless once famously threw a hotel room television set out the window.

marilyn manson or sir elton john? >> they all seem like they could have done that. kennedy: it's a tough one. >> he seems like the one who wouldn't do that, i'll go with elton john. kennedy: he's a world class tantrum throer but it's keith richards. it's kind of surprising because he's got those skinny little chicken arms from years of treating his body great. >> and tvs back then were big. kennedy: is everyone tied in all 1-1-1. okay. this is it. this is worth two points. this is the last round for everyone. which of these rich and shameless has a runway at his house for his multiple private jets. brad pitt, john travion green volta, or andy -- travolta or andy dick? >> john travolta. a. kennedy: that is correct right. which of the rich and shameless

spent a third of his national budget on a year-long party. dominican republic dictator, libyan dictator or north korean dictator? >> i'll say the dominican republic. kennedy: you would be right. rafael trujillo. kennedy: we're so going there. >> let's do it with our evs. kennedy: our private tesla island. dave, which of the rich and shameless had their pet monkey confiscated from them trying to bring it illegally to a foreign country. justin beiber, diplo, or nicole richy. who's dumb enough to take your monkey to a foreign country. >> he wants to be like michael jackson and he is an idiot so justin beiber. kennedy: you would be correct we have a three-way tie so you have

no way to break it. >> i don't want to split an island with these two. >> you'd love it. calm down. kennedy: you'll have to mud wrestle for the teslas. can't wait till it's in safe driving mode so we can whew. great night. beautifully done. >> thanks, kennedy. kennedy: coming up, inflation is forcing some businesses to get creative. you've heard of turning lemons into lemonade. how about turning cheese into vodka? i'll take two. thirsty thursday creamery owner todd cook is here next.

kennedy: inflation isn't only making people poor, it's making them creative. i have some good news. look at the owners of the tmk creamery in my home state of oregon. they began milking their cows for extra profits by converting

a cheese by protect called whey into hypped vodka going for $40 a bottle. this thirsty thursday, are you ready for more? the owner of tmk creamery in oregon, part of the three rivers league, todd cook is here. hi, todd. >> hi you doing, kennedy? kennedy: super. >> do i look all right? kennedy: you look amazing. >> nice. yeah, i'm kind of built for radio so the tv thing is not usually my gig. kennedy: you look like a dapper gent and we're happy to have you and i want to know what does cow-cahol. what does whey that's dis-'tilled and fermented -- is it good? >> it's fantastic, kennedy. we're really, really happy with the taste of cowcohol. we had people try it out and give us reviews, and they're

number one thing they tell us is that, you know, make sure, you know, they're in criteria serving to their colleagues and they wouldn't hesitate one bit. kennedy: does it taste like dairy? does it taste infused with creamy goodness from your cow's teat? >> no, absolutely not. no, you're fermenting the lactose in whey and then you're dis-'tilling off the alcohol. distilling off the alcohol and it's got a bit of a vanilla finish to it. kennedy: i love that . i love mixing vanilla vodka with godiva and coconut milk. we call them yummy happies and our team is very fond of them. they're not as fond of sobriety as they used to b and we're very eager to get our hands on some of this cowcohol because we want to do a team taste test here at

team kennedy, and we want to taste for ourselves this tmk. i know -- this is fascinating. you let people come down to the creamery, which is one of the great things about oregon, you let students come in and milk the cows and pet the cows and they have a deep connection. miss tmk is your prize winning beauty. she has her own single cow cheese that's $42 for 6 ounces. is it the most delicious cheese there is? >> absolutely, kennedy. come on. no, she's one of the only cows in the world that we know of that can sell a special single cow cheese so, you know, she's kind of our poster cowlebe rty we call her. she's the best of the best. kennedy: i think that -- i'm not going to lie, vodka and delicious punch of cheese sounds like a wonderful combination. i'm glad you are taking

something that would be dis-carded and making a high-end spirit with it. it is what people will have to do in the coming recession, and i hope in order to comfort themselves, they turn to your creamery for all your ingenious delights. todd cook, thank you so much if being here. appreciate it. >> thank you very much. when you're in the pacific northwest, hit us up. kennedy: i'm going to be there next weekend. i will come see you todd. i'll bring my whole crazy family. >> yes, do it. kennedy: okay. thanks, man. all right. can't wait for that. topical storm is next.

this is xfinity rewards. our way of showing our appreciation. with rewards of all shapes and sizes.

[ cheers ] are we actually going? yes!! and once in a lifetime moments. two tickets to nascar! yes! find rewards like these and so many more in the xfinity app.

kennedy: welcome back. mottly cru drummer tommy lee posting a full frontal nude photo of himself on his instagram account. thankfully the picture has been deleted because instagram ran out of storage. he's got a giant wean that he can honk a boat with. that's antisocial media and this is topical tomorrow. topic one, we begin in lovely pacific california with the world dog surfing championships and the most prestigious way into tricking your dog into taking a bath. it's beach patrol versus paw patrol and thankfully the surf

was nice and calm and extremely ruff. hasn't seen a dog ride a wave like that since the rise of beto o'rourke. they were judged on ride, surfing technique and style. most of them did it with doggy style. yeah, the dogs all gave their best efforts but the trophy for overall surf champs claimed by australian cattle dog named skyler. he didn't win the trophy, he paid on it and claimed it as -- peeed on it and claimed it as his own. my kind of guy. topic two, shake shack selling a vented candles with the scent of restaurants and they smell like marijuana. the candles include enough wax to burn for over 40 hours but the easiest way to smell like shake shack for 40 hours is step inside one for three could he say. it includes the candle called shake and fries and smells like a french fry dipped in a milk

shake and known as a sweet potato. another candle called burger in the park, which is said to capture the essence of eating shake shack on a warm day in new york city because if there's one thing people love about warm days in new york city, it's the smell. so if these candles sound like your cup of vomit, order them now for $42. i'm saving my money for a candle that smells like the men's room at yankee said yum. bit of a -- stadium. bit of a slump. it's thirsty thursday and video of the biggest party foul since amber heard bedroom incident. go to louisville, kentucky, where a semi truck tipped over on an interstate ramp spilling thousands of bud light cans on to the road. we know how many bud lights it takes to make a semi truck tipsy. i haven't seen this many six packs since the premier of magic mike xxl and as many booze since

the time that president biden when to the army navy game. they were like boo, let's go brandon. it reportedly took hours to clear the spill because these days when you ask people to pick up bud light, they only show up with coronas instead. police say after the crash the driver was 100% all right but the bad news what they meant by that is he lost the entire left side of his body. that's all i got. topic number four. speak speaking of people who think they're all right, time to read viewer mail. kurt starts us off at good-bye, kennedy nation. our relationship is over. kurt, you say that now but next week you'll be like what's your number, baby? robert tweets kennedy is acarine. a karen. yeah, robert is latin from salty

yanker. dave chimes in, are you from outer space. yeah, and donald trump had files about me and my lgms and that's what the national archive idiots wanted. tycoon said very cringe, kennedy. was that in response to a certain moment? very cringe. that's everything and you're welcome. and we will be right back. go nowhere.

kennedy: oh my god, thank you for watching the best hour of your day.

follow me on twitter and instagram@kennedynation and facebook and e-mail kennedyfbn@foxbusiness.com and on spotify, apple podcast, it's a great one with adam corolla. can't watch the show, make every day a kennedy. bye bye.