information can travel up to what speed? ashley, genius boy, you're fi first. ashley: if itches cruel, and say if i was joe bind, 10 miles per hour in the fast lane with indicator permanently on. i'm not that cruel. i'll go be no. 3, 305. stuart: that's a wild guess. you must play. you can't opt out of this. lauren: someone might have whispered in my ear, 268 miles per hour. ashley: stuart: i'm going with 350. that's how fast in my brain. the answer is 268 miles per hour. lauren: i cheated. stuart: about 100 trillion neural connections in the brain and 1,000 times the number of stars in our galaxy. lauren: who figured this stuff out? stuart: it's brilliant and watch this program to find out what's real lifetime's up for us, three, two, one, coast-to-coast starts now. neil: thank you, stuart, for that. you don't need the supreme court to rule on this. nvidia and bitcoin rule, period.

here's what we have discovered so far today. colorado can't keep donald j. trump off the ballot and they can't keep the sizzlers from sizzling and nvidia soaring to another record and bitcoin topping $66,000 a coin. close to taking out its own record and nvidia takes out last friday especially and if it happens a nearly 3-year-old one. some call that fraud and david wagner calls that maybe something else. talk about bucking the trend if you think about it. so far it seems as though the supreme court of investors has ruled don't interfere here. what do you make of what's going on there? >> i try not to focus on politics side of things and recognize what's going on in politics and equate to the market. going back to 1950, you know. the incumbent has always won the reelection and when they have not won the reelection, market

has always been down that year and look back to 1960, 2008 and 2000 itself. as long as incumbent president is running, president joe biden, you expect the market to have a positive year this year. year-to-date s&p 500 up 7% and put it on track for 13th best start for s&p 500 since 1950. one thing i've told my an life-threatenings and a lot of partners at aptus capital is great performance begets great performance. most of the time follow the tame of the market and right now it's telling you that we could have a pretty good year for s&p 500. neil: we're talking about hot stocks like nvidia and even when it comes to so-called things like bitcoin and crypto plays and no matter the political story of the day and waiting to hear from former president trump what he makes out of ewe man nows ruling in the -- unanimous ruling in the supreme court and doing the part and you're right to point out in a presidential

election year and usually the wind at market's back. i'm wondering how this story develops and dictated by economic news and relatively table and expecting a good job's report on friday and get these incredible numbers that seem to certify that administered official intelligence is not just some sort of quake investment and it's real. there's real money there and how do you play that, david? >> the market loves narratives and that narrative will be artificial intelligence, on the beginning part of the show, the market is focusing on the residenting on areas of the market and nvidia, bitcoins and your small caps, but if you look at just the valuation because that tends to be a sole metric investor and showing if you should be invested somewhere and like nvidia is the only game in play, it's a winner take all battle, especially for when you compare to an amd or some other

source but look at valuation of nvidia right now, trading at 31 times. that's a valuation that hasn't traded since 2013 when it really didn't have any data center play in it is forecast from revenue perspective and caretive analysis basis and intel corp. and i don't think anyone if they're comparing a valuation or investment analysis between you'd jaire and intel they'll choose it over nvidia and they're both trading at 31 times forward earning ands, neil, what i've told a lot of clients a lot of data has been somewhat negative and there was a strong cpi report two weeks ago and pretty tough jobless claims last week and it's more about the teflon market and it's really just shrugging off any type of bad data. neil: you combined all that very nicely. very susp susis singletly and tt

seem like generous multiples and for a market like that, they're tamed for a technology stock and that's part of what's going on here. in the meantime to the supreme court ruling i was telling you about, unanimous ruling at that more or less said you can't keep donald trump's name off the ballot and not only a message to colorado but a few other states that were considering that. david spunt has more. david. reporter: well, hey, neil. on the bottom of the screen we're waiting for the former president to react to that so i may get cut off here. this is a big decision and win in the trump campaign and those that wat watched and listened to supreme court argument early this month and the supreme court and liberal justices seemed skeptical of kick ago presidential candidate off a bat hollywood. last month justices heard argues from colorado voters and wanted trump off the ballot set ago key provision of 14th amendment. neil, specifically section 3 and

bars him from holding federal office that engaged in insurrection while an officer of the united states and the question is if it applied to president trump and his context while in office much the court writes today in part, responsibility for enforcing section 3 against federal officer holders and candidates rests with congress and not the states and the judgment of the colorado supreme court therefore cannot stand. all nine members of the court, meaning the supreme court agree with that result. speaking of donald trump, he's had some legal luck recently and these are the people that indicted donald trump last year. special council jack smith on the left twice, fulton county district attorney fani willis once and manhattan da alvin bragg once and adds up to four times and one of the four has a trial that's set on the calendar. that's the new york case involving hush money palms to adult film actress starmi

daniels and da willis may get booted from the case and trump's two federal trials and delays and pencil and after both sides asked for it and it's the supreme court delayed rulings for them to overturn the election trial and it was supposed to begin and today march 4 in dc and that could be later this summer. neil. neil: just incredible. i don't know how you do that, but you co. david, thank you very much. the supreme court meets on week of april 22 and oral arguments for the former president to push for immunity for any charges and he was president at the time and you do that all of the presidents are always in danger. again, that would delay a host of potential trials including the entire january 6 thing. going on and on. andrew mccarthy, former assistant u.s. attorney and fox news contributor julia

manchester on the hill. andrew, a lot of people leapt on this unanimous decision to say, all right, maybe the immunity case goes the same way. it's kind of legal apples and oranges though, isn't it? >> it is and i'm not even on board with the unanimous decision euphoria. i think this is a 5-4 decision, neil, on one of the most important issues on whether congress itself in the next january 6 would have been able to invoke section 3 of the 14th amendment to disqualify trump. the majority, five justices who wrote the procurium as they called it said you have to be convicted urn the federal penal law of i thinks recollection in order for that -- insurrection for that to be invoked and four justices and justice barrett didn't think they should reach that at all and three progressives on the court were strident in their opposition to the majorities having done that,

and they referred to the other opinion as majority opinion and not the procurium and i'm not on board with this whole idea it was a kumbaya moment where the court spoke with one voice 9-0. i think if you get into the.bit that's not what happened but you're quite right. the immunity case is a different case and trump is expected to lose that case i think by most legal analysts and the other thing that's out there is the obstruction case that the court will also decide so there's a lot of rounds to be played here. neil: yeah, something tells me, julia, when we hear from the former president, he's not going to thread the field the way that andrew brilliantly just did but talking about unanimous feature and that's sort of the latest signs he's taking control of the legal issues. so far it's going his way but we forget he has half a billion in payments he has to put up to

make good on e gene carol and fine -- e jean carole and what do you make of all? , julia? >> we're going to see former president trump tout as a victory. you're absolutely right, neil. he's not going to get into the nuance of this or very unlikely to get into the nuance of this and probably makes sense for him. what a lot of americans read this headline, they're going to see this unanimous decision and this is something the trump campaign was not pour worried about and the a lot of legal experts and political experts expected this ruling at the top level where it was unanimous and we'll see him tout this. in terms of how this impacts the republican presidential primary, the race there's the argument he

has millions in legal payments and could very much play a role in his campaign going forward. but on top of that, you also have this argument that some are making.

>> jack smith's team announced the 60-day rule and unwritten rule of justice department they're not supposed to take action within 60 dais of an election to avoid influencing it. it's regarded as not pop aretivm and i take that to mean they expect that trump will lose the immunity claim and that they will be able to begin a trial against him after labor day and run that trial through election day if that's how long it takes to try it. so i think that, you know, to the extent that people are looking at what happened today and saying the law fare campaign has failed. i would point out to people that a defendant is required to be in court for every day of a

criminal trial, and i think these guys are planning to try him from september to november. neil: that would be very disruptive for donald trump in the middle of a presidential campaign assuming he's the republican nominee and if he's convicted on any of the charges, how that would resinate. the consensus seems to be a conviction changing the game. i'm not so sure among its most enthusiastic supporters it does, 90 some odd indictments haven't done that. maybe a conviction would. what do you think? >> look, i think when we talk about a conviction in the general election sense, we need to look at independent swing voters trump and biden are vying for and if trump is making court appearances from september to november, there's this logic he's going to get all this freed media attention and going to make a spectacle out of all the courtroom appearances and appearance outside and talk to the media that way. if you sort of contrast that with the biden campaign assuming

president biden is on the trail and sending surrogates on the trail and talking about kitchen table issues like the economy, i would imagine that contrast would hurt donald trump because he'd be forced to talk about his legal issues and that would absolutely run up the margins in terms of his base. i don't know how that plays in a general election sense. that's why you're seeing the biden campaign very careful about how they approach questions about donald trump's legal issues and they want to be careful because they know that's not necessarily a top priority for voters that might be on the fence between trump and the biden. craneil: glad you point that had out and from team biden it's been crickets and no response to this in aany shape or form and over the supreme court's decision today. andrew, what has donald trump risked if he overtalks about this? know what i mean, like overplays this?

if you were his lawyer advicing him which is always a herculean task, what would you tell him as we wait to see what he thinks of this? >> i'd first tell him, neil, it's important that i get my fee up front the way things are going and i think that needs to be established. as far as what he says, i really think that ship has kind of sailed with him. there's never been a lawyer they've ever created, cohen included, to tell this guy anything more than ten minutes or so. he'll say what he says if he thinks it's expedient for political purposes because he really regards what helicopters in right now as more of a political battle than a legal one. you could always tell him to exercise restraint when he speaks because the court that

decides this case will decide the next case and maybe other ones that are equally important, but i just don't think that resinates with him as advice. neil: it's interesting, guys, the backdrop we're showing you the markets and that's not axotal, julia. the backdrop for the president has been the soaring markets all the sudden, not so much today but the dow and technology stocks and under his stewardship and watch and if you want to credit him or not and artificial intelligence seems to get street credit card with the numbers we got out of nvidia and some of the other big names that prove there's real money to be made there. by the billions and hundreds of billions at that across the broad swath of companies likening this to the intern boom and that's real money being made and not imaginary money but real money and investment bets being placed and add that to the job gains on friday and jobs report that could show maybe another 200,000 and hearing from the biden folks, that's their wind

at their back forget alaska the cases that donald trump might win here and there or whatever. what do you make of that? >> yeah, make sense that the biden campaign is claiming credit for that and another example of how they're turning the attention away from donald trump's legal is issues and putg it on the economy. they've been talking about lowering unemployment urn the biden administration and they're going to continue to do it as well. hey also been talking about unemployment even though they've been hit with inflation. inflation appears to be ticking down but you often hear from republicans and crit ibrams of the biden administration rightfully so that a lot of americans aren't yet feeling the impacts of that. they're still paying more for goods and services, for example in the grocery store. the logic on biden campaign's part has been to say, look, this is going to be a process. it's going to take some time and if we see that happen under the

biden administration the average american will connect that to the biden administration instead of connections to the trump administration. we'll have to look and see how trump sort of squares that circle and how he's able to bring that back to his own camphane and administration and trump is in office four years ago. four years ago today we were at the beginning of the corona virus pandemic and markets and economy for better -- no matter whether it was donald trump's fault took a dive. the economy was not in a good place and a lot of americans associate that with donald trump so donald trump is really going to have to message around that. neil: there's a lot of things i

want to follow and almost to a survey and i wont say universally and more people are feeling a bit more optimistic and a little bit more about enacting their own finances and where we're going. here's the caveat with that, they're not giving credit otojoe biden, he get as bit but not a lot. that's the con strategies nation of the white house and -- consternation from the white house and they're worried. should they be worried? >> i think they should. you know, from talking to democratic sources about this, they say, you know, point once again to this being a long game and say this is going to take some time and it's going to take time for americans to feel that and change their messages and tweak their messaging on this and make sure that americans

believe this is something that happened urn the biden administration. you're starting to see the biden campaign talk about that when he goes to factories and plans and it's a hurdle for them to try and claim credit for this because it's not necessarily clear to a lot of americans neil: got it, we're waiting for the former president. there again, his times has been pushed back a bit. we don't know what he's going to say. wantsto crow about the fact that a unanimous decision like colorado can't just take someone off the ballot. andy mccarthy was pointing out and doesn't mean it's a jew anne unanimous choice and it has to be decided by the house and not individual state. it's not so black and white, the president obviously has something to crow about here and he's played this illegally brilliantly and a lot of people

step back saying he appeared to be in this sort of legal labyrinth from which he can't escape and somehow he finds a way of unshackling himself. he'll detail all that coming up. in the meantime, we're detailing a market that refuses to quit on technology stocks or nvidia or so-called rogue investments like anything crypto. they're doing just fine. scandals or not, ballot issues or not, supreme court decisions or not, after this. there are some things that work better together. like your workplace benefits and retirement savings. voya provides tools that help you make the right investment and benefit choices. so you can reach today's financial goals. and look forward to a more confident future. voya, well planned, well invested, well protected. after last month's massive solar flare added a 25th hour to the day, businesses are wondering "what should we do with it?" i'm thinking company wide power nap. [ employees snoring ] anything can change the world of work. from hr to payroll, adp designs for the next anything.

starting a business is never easy, but starting it eight months pregnant... that's a different story. with the chase ink card, we got up and running in no time. earn unlimited 1.5% cash back on every purchase with the chase ink business unlimited card. make more of what's yours. ♪ i have type 2 diabetes, but i manage it well ♪ ♪ jardiance! ♪ ♪ it's a little pill with a big story to tell ♪ ♪ i take once-daily jardiance ♪ ♪ at each day's start! ♪ ♪ as time went on it was easy to see ♪ ♪ i'm lowering my a1c! ♪ jardiance works twenty-four seven in your body to flush out some sugar. and for adults with type 2 diabetes and known heart disease, jardiance can lower the risk of cardiovascular death, too. serious side effects may include ketoacidosis that may be fatal, dehydration that can lead to sudden

worsening of kidney function, and genital yeast or urinary tract infections. a rare, life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this infection ketoacidosis, or an allergic reaction. you may have an increased risk for lower limb loss. call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of infection in your legs or feet. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. ♪ jardiance is really swell ♪ ♪ the little pill ♪ ♪ with a big story to tell! ♪ businesses go further with 5g solutions.

that's why they choose t-mobile for business. pga of america and t-mobile are partnering on 5g-powered analytics to help improve player performance. t-mobile's network helps aaa stay connected nationwide... to get their members back on the road. and las vegas grand prix chose t-mobile to help fuel operations for one of the world's largest racing events. now is the time to see what america's largest 5g network can do for your business. the best advice i ever got was to invest with vanguard for my retirement. the second best? stay healthy enough to enjoy it. so i started preparing physically and financially. then you came along and made every mile worth it.

hi mom. at vanguard you're more than just an investor, you're an owner. helping you prepare for today's longer retirement. that's the value of ownership. neil. the scene on the left of your screen at palm beach at mar-a-lago and the president's home away from home. he's set to talk about the supreme court effectively to tell the state of colorado you can't take the move on the part of the state to take anyone off the presidential ballot. it's not that black and white that a number of legal analyst said when it came to a decision that could do that and the

justices letting out that's a congress move. that's not necessarily a state's move. be that as it may, the former president focusing on that 9-0 vote and we'll be hearing from him shortly and when we speaks, we'll go there and charlie gasparino will be there picking his fine brain. what's happening with bitcoin and in and out 06 record levels and not that far from one scored three years ago and focus on nvidia and that one is break ago record that was scored just on friday. steve, what do you make of this, the interactive broker's chief market strategist and strategy for bitcoin seems to be bye bye bye and it's volatile but what do you make of the latest runup? >> neil, thanks for having me and the strategies right now is momentum trading that translates to buy buy buy because it's going up, up, up and it continues and old high ask

attractor beam at this point and we're so close that it's considering how thin and i'm going to say easily moved bitcoin can be, you know, by those who have a real active role in it, it's seems inevitable that we're going to -- that people will chase it up to a new high. and t not tethered to any fundamentals and why not? neil: steve, people saying the latest catalyst is him having in april and cut the available supply i get that, but it's sort of like the way initially the bitcoin and some of the other responded to the first etf trading and this stuff. there was a delayed response. took awhile. might be an early response to this thing and i don't know what it is. i know it's volatile and what do you tell folks?

>> one thing i was saying and i ought this reasonably well and addition of etfs going to be buy the rumor and sell the news idea and a week later after we sold off, i kind of reversed that call and said, you know what, that's over. by reason for the buy the rumor sell the news is number one i've been through and seen this movie before and good in the markets for a long time. they're generally inevitable and number two in the case of bitcoin very specifically, the ftx bankruptcy seizure disorders estate had a huge holding in the gptc, gray scale bitcoin and they're not wasting any time just about a month and a half ago and talking about 67,000 today and that's a rocket ship ride and i defie a lot of people

buying bitcoin to explain that and leverage bitcoin in the form of publicly traded software stock. and they made a timely purchase cpi people tend to foal low what they do and that was the latest kickoff of the leg. neil: steve, thank you on that. bitcoin crypto related investments soring and eye on lower right and flags backdropping former president of the united states and donald trump speaking in mar-a-lago and ahead we have edward lawrence at white house. i don't believe the white house has talked about this

reporter: white house not mentioning the supreme court case and campaign pointing to comments that president biden made on january 30th basically saying that he does believe why not president trump or former president trump should be on the ballot in colorado but again silence here about this today and president at camp david and he's going over his state of the union address on thursday. we do expect him to talk about some of the good things that happen in the economy and going to point for example to the fact that unemployment rate has been under 4% for years, which it has been but the president will not mention that prices have risen 18% year over year from the month he took office. >> the state of the union is on occasion when the president really leads the entire administration in telling that story. the story of what's achieved and

the vision to come. reporter: the economy still at top of concerns and immigration next and abortion debate and president biden losing on first two in the polls and believes he wins on the third and still, polling shows many minority groups moving closer to former president trump head-to-head and president biden gets 66% of black votes and former president trump getting 28% when you look at hispanic voters, 49% for biden and 48% for president trump and that's within the margin of error and hispanics see what it's like to live in america under president biden and polls are reflecting this. >> i they want our leaders to put america first and not last. sound money and low inflation and a secure boarder and they want to be receiver malik taylored across the globe. they don't want to have to have living under a president like joe biden who has a terrible foreign policy that has put our men and women overseas at risk. reporter: republican withs the

many issues starting with the economy and foreign policy and democrats are saying the president needs a little more time to institute, fully institute his changes for this economy and things will be better. neil. neil: thank you very much for that, ed warted lawrence at the white house. edward lawrence at white house. i want to go to lie soft and lid my buddy charlie gasparino and what to expect to hear out of donald trump and he's been successful at pushing back in a lot of high pressure situations and costly in the civil suit payments to make and what do you make of what he'll likely say on the supreme court ruling and where he stands legally? >> we well, i think he'll say sf that's benefited him that he's being persecuted by the deep state, by the liberal establishment, by the biden administration, and he's going to have the republican nomination sewn up in a few days, and if you look at the polling, he's actually now

pulling ahead of biden. he's starting to convince people there is something deeper here than just a big conspiracy theory they're out to get donald trump. you know this because some of the cases against him are so absurd. i mean, let's go through them all. fani willis, okay. he yelled at secretary of state of georgia and bring as rico case and overpays the lawyer -- the prosecutor on the rico case who she's having an affair with. think about how absurd that is. letitia james out there essentially fining trump and getting a liberal judge to fine trump $400 million for victimless crime. people still don't understand what he took out of the oval office. for all i know, he took, i don't know, a love letter to macron. i have no idea. we don't know how to judge it because everybody has taken stuff from the oval office. neil: the perception it's orlikowski kill and unfair and resinating. >> yeah, really, if you go

through each one, they're flam seizure disorders cases. flamsy cases. neil: liza, the president former president is winning and it's still early and i don't know if it's a reflection of the legal pile on and some people feeling sorry and incompetencies coming up with joe biden and he's looking too old, acting too old. i don't know what it is, but there does seem to be a shift here. what do you make of it? >> yeah, i think it's too two separate things. i think we're seeing him consolidate the republican party, and that is in part because of these charges. i spent a lot of time out talking to voters, republican voters, who had earlier on in the cycle considered some of the other candidates did feel like as the charges match they had to go in and defend trump. i'm not hearing from swing voters about the charges as

something that's convincing them. what i am hearing is about the economy, immigration, those polling numbers you saw earlier, economy is doing better but voters are not feeling it yet. again, this election is decided by a very small number of voters in several states. i'm leer in phoenix -- here in phoenix and biden won arizona by just 10,000 votes. those voters are less on charges and how they felt under president trump versus president biden. what they're saying to me at this moment is it's very tight but trump is getting the enemies in part because of the economy voters are still feeling prices are too high. neil: yeah, one thing you hear, charlie, some voters in some surveys are feeling better about themselves and where they're going, but they're not giving credit to joe biden. >> first off, perception baked in and inflation point out rate

of innation has come down dramatically. neil: that's right. >> prices remain high. neil: taxpayers very important. >> wages have not kept up and people feel bad. i disagree about the notion that swing voters. in this sense, of course if you're going to talk to swing voters they'll say economy number one, what most people do. there's something interesting and i hear, you hear it from the sort of ultimate liberal swing voter that works on wall street like a jamie dimon, who starts remarking about how the business community in new york state can't -- is not -- is watching letitia james and judge kaplan fine trump $400 million for a nothing burger and thinking of moving out. jamie dimon is a liberal, let's face it. he's a little bit, you know, he's not woke at times but he's a liberal. for him to say that shows that some of this stuff is piling on

trump and people are like when they get to know what's going on, it's government wasting time on it this stuff. how they'd put it and when you have a portanova us border and porous border and a president and going back to eat ice cream. it's bizarre. there we government neil: eliza, waiting for them to go. tomorrow is super tuesday and picking up a few hundred more ddelegates and conceivably have by march 19th at the late then what? what do you think? >> well, what trump would like to happen is that haley is out of the race and he can look ahead to a general election against biden, which is really what we're all looking towards at this point.

it's just a few more dates to consolidate that and haley did win dc over the weekend and other than that, she's not won any states and the big thing that will happen starting tomorrow is that state wills start being winner take all if trump hits over 50%. up till now, haley has been able to walk away from most states. at least where she's been on the ballot for some delegates and that's a state like california which has a massive number of delegates and that threshold and did you want matter that haley came close if she gets 40% and he's going to walk away with all the delegates, and that's how as we get closer to march 19 he could sew this up very quickly. >> a quick point on haley, it's if she runs on no labels and this story has not gotten the media attention it deserves in my view.

neil: think she will? >> i don't know. neil: lose eric laws in this state? >> i don't know. is that true? neil: some states don't allow if you're bowing out. >> maybe. in a couple weeks we'll know who their potential candidates are. and her name is being bounced around. now, it seems to me, just watching it, she's not on board with the trump agenda at all. right, i mean -- neil: made it very clear it's not a guarantee and edge of the pledge. >> she said he's an existential threat in a different way than biden. that to me has no labels written all over it but we'll see. i mean, it seems to me -- neil: you talk to the money guys, are they with her through tomorrow or not? we're going to break away from that. donald trump right now commenting on the supreme court decision. >> it was a very important decision and very well crafted, and i think it will go a long way toward bringing our country together, which our country

needs. they work long, they worked hard, and frankly they worked very quickly on something that will be spoken about 100 years from now and 200 years from now, extremely important. essentially you cannot take somebody out of a race because an opponent would like to have it that way. it has nothing to do with the fact that it's the leading candidate whether it was the leading candidate or a candidate that was well down on the totem pole, you cannot kick somebody out of a race. the voters can take the person out of the race very quickly, but a court shouldn't be doing that and the supreme court showed that very well. i really do believe that'll be a unifying factor because while most states who are thrilled to have me, there were some that didn't and didn't want that for political reasons and didn't want that because of poll numbers because the poll numbers are very good.

we're beating president biden in almost every poll, new york times came out yesterday with a very big poll for us. they didn't like that and you can't do that. you can't do what they tried to do. hopefully colorado as an example will unify and there's tremendous support. they've wrote their support up very strong in colorado and people in colorado thought it was a terrible thing that they did. while we're on the subject, and another thing that will be coming up very soon will be immunity for a president. not immunity for me but any president that if a president doesn't have full immunity, you really don't have a president because nobody that is serving in that office will have the courage to be the right decision and could be the one that makes decisions and have to make them free of all terror that can be

reigned mono-them when they leave office or before they leave office. some decisions are very tough. i can tell you that as a president that some decisions they make are very tough. i took out isis and i took out some very big people from the standpoint of a different part of the world. two of the leading terrorists, probably the two leading terrorists ever that we've ever seen in this world, and those are big decisions. i don't want to be prosecuted for it, i know the president wouldn't want to be prosecuted for it. it had a tremendously positive impact, it stopped everything cold and sometimes you have to make it. they were tough decisions and times you have to make a decision like that . when you make a decision, you don't want your opposing par for evidence of infection opponent or -- party or opponent or something that thinks you're wrong bring a suit against you or any kind of suit when you leave office. i have that at a level that

nobody's ever seen before. i have rogue prosecutoors and rogue judges that are out of control. and it's a very unfair thing for me, but serving perhaps as a sample to others of what should not be happening when you make good decisions and in my case the economy was great. we didn't go into any wars, totally defeated isis, we provided the largest tax cuts in history, we provided the largest regulation cuts in history, but think of it, no wars. we beat isis 100% of the caliphate and no wars and maybe i wouldn't have done that if the caliphate defeating them and very powerful and was going to take four years and took me four months, but it was a very strong thursday and saturday and can beat them, defeat them, get them and we ended 20 years of isis

quickly. i don't want to be prosecuted but in that case it worked out very well and some things that perhaps don't work out so well. i don't want to be prosecuted because i decided to do something that is very much of the good of the country and actually for the good of the world. a president shouldn't have that on his mind and he has to have a free and clear mind when he makes very big decisions or it's going to be nothing more than a ceremonial post. you'll be president and it'll be wonderful thing and you won't do anything because you don't want to be hit by your opponent or somebody else because who wants to leave office and go through what i've gone through? i'm being prosecuted by biden, my opponent, because every one of these things whether it's fani willis or bragg, these are local and state, but they're in total coordination with the white house. you can't do that and shouldn't be done.

i mean, in the case of the da's office and top one of the top people, maybe the second person in the manhattan da's office to get trump. they had a hillary clinton lawyer leave the law firm, very prestigious law firm leave to go into the da's office to get trump -- trump. he goes in to be a prosecutor. worked for the democrat party and hillary clinton and goes into prosecute donald trump at a local level. in total coordination with the department of justice meaning biden. and then you have the fani willis or fani, f-a-n-i, fani, she hired someone new, the person long before this horrible prosecution took place and went out and paid him unbelievable

amount of money, more money he dreamt possible and more than anyone doing that for a living got paid and they had obviously a conflict. we don't vascularized to go into that. they were able -- we don't need to get into that. i'm a high profile person and able to pay him close to a million dollars when he was not equipped to do the job and she's not equipped to do the job and that case should end immediately and it's so conflicted and nobody has seen anything like it and deranged jack smith that's a trump hater and represents all the trump haters and heavyweights going wild. he's a wild man and overturned unanimously by the supreme court, went after other people over the years and great failure, but he's mean and he's nasty and unfair and the judges on these cases are all trump haters. other than maybe one or two that can be fair but look at new

york. they have tremendous hatred and can't do this to a president. i'm not talking about me but in the future. a president has to be flee. if the president does a good job, i did, some people say a great job. if the president does a good job, a president should be free and clear and frankly celebrated for having done a good job and not indicted four times and not gone after on a civil basis and not demanded to pay hundreds of millions in fines on something that was absolutely perfect where there was no victims and financial statements were absolutely flawless and disclaimer clauses. i wasn't given a jury and had a clubhouse judge come up with have number on a perfect loan and financial statements and even at that, if you look the

disclaimer says don't rely on the financial statements in any way shape or form. go out and do your own work. the banking question had the most sophisticated lawyers in the world judge franklin: ly and very top, one of the top law firms in the country. guys like bragg and les james and fani and jack smith and thigh should be hiding violent chime and that'll led me to the end and president biden number one stop weaponization. fight your fight yourself. don't use prosecutors and judges to go after your opponent to damage your opponent to win an election. our country is bigger than that. i also say to president biden, close the boarders now. this is not guilty sustainable for our country, it's not

sustainable for our cities, our country is under siege. this is a violent thing that you've done and many people are dying many, many people are dying. they die on the trip up, they die going through the border and die in our country but many people coming up are from prisons and jails, from mental institutions and insane asylums and many are terrorists, you see it, many, many are terrorists, and i believe the real number we have right now is probably closer to 15 million people and by the time it's de-prioritizizationed, i believe the president's term ends, i believe you'll be at close to 20 million people. that's almost larger than any state in the union. our country, it is not sustainable. many of these people are tough. many of them are bad.

they come from some of the roughest countries in the worlds and roughest prisons and prisons in the congo in africa coming. we have people coming from all parts of the middle east. they're copping from yemen and yet we're bombing yemen. you have to stop and close the border. you have absolute authorization and don't need congress. i had the safest border in the history of the country and i didn't use congress and build hundreds of miles of wall and the reason i built it and how i built it is i considered it an invasion of our country and took the money from the military. the army corp. of engineers. they did it with me and we did a great job. we had the safest border ever and now the most unsafe boarder and nowhere in the world there's bever been a border like this and anywhere would have fought with sticks and stones to stop the horrible situation that's occurring.

our people can't stand it and the people coming in really can't stand it because they're dying. ma are diagnose on the trip up and dying in the country and many of the people are criminals and they're doing tremendous harm. i call it migrant crime. it's migrant crime. it's a new category of crime. they're hurting our country horribly and we've become a laughing stock all over the world. i say respectfully to president biden you have the authorization right now, i did it. i didn't go to congress and say do i have the right to close. i fought congress. close the boarders. you can do it right now. you have everything and use policies and my policies were great and everybody said it. use my policies. i have great respect for the supreme court and i want to just thank them for working so quickly and so diligently and so brilliantly and again, this is a

unifying factor. everybody goes together and they can go after me as a politician, they can go after me with votes, but they're not gong that go after me -- going to go after me with that kind of lawsuit that takes somebody out of a race, who's leading in this case but even if the person wasn't leading. and i want to thank you all for being here. do we have any questions? >> poll numbers are massive for you going into super tuesday. we found a lot of people with agnostic politics in general and see legal cases against you and life blood back under current administration. think that's the key to pull some of the independent voters into the next election see that the case is unfair and there's no merit and also poll numbers and provide for trump? >> it's an interesting question and historically a thing like what i've been going through would have hurt a political party or political candidate terrificically. you wouldn't even be able to run and you'd get out.

this has happened over many years and many times. in this case, the polls show i was much more popular than weaponization. this is for third world countries, not for us. biden won't drop all these and may do better if he does and people would say that was very reasonable. they were all, the state, the city, and the federal, they're all coordinated and fani willis' lover spent hours and hours at white house and council and doj plotting out this plan. nobody talks about that. they're all coordinated with the white house and it's weaponization and never been done in this country and done in third world and banana republics and never in this country. so i really believe what they should do is really go all the way, go out and stop all of this nonsense.

they're nonsense cases and such an embarrassment to georgia and jack smith i don't think is any better. let's james is terrible. she campaigned on i will get trump, i will get trump and goes before a trump-hating judge. i mean, the whole thing is a rigged deal and the public understands it. i'm lucky i can explain to the public because if you weren't able to explain it, the public wouldn't know. they'd believe what they see so i don't want to win this way. look, i want to win based on my policies and we're going to cut taxes and get interest rates down and buy homes again. can't buy a home the interest rates are so high. i want to win on safe borders and stop wars and stop the war in use crane and israel. ukraine would have never been

attacked and israel would have never been attacked if i was president. i had low energy prices and would have kept them there very easily and probably caused the war with ukraine because putin became rich all of a sud and it went up so much and i watched president biden talking about putin. putin became very rich because at $100 a barrel, he's got so much money to fight a war. at $40 a barrel, he doesn't have the money to fight a war. he wouldn't have done it anyway because i told him not to. i just want to thank all of you for being here. it's a very big day for for america, and for liberty, and just a great day for this country. again, i hope it's unifying like i think, but it's a big step toward unification. i hope that the justices because they'll be working on some other cases but one in particular, president haves to be given

total immunity and have to be allowed to do their job. if they're not allowed, it's not what the founders wanted but more importantly, it'll be terrible for our country. thank you all very much. i appreciate it. neil: donald trump pretty pleased with this decision out of the supreme court and unanimous one saying colorado can't keep donald trump off the ballot and applies to other states toying with the idea including maine, massachusetts possibly and seeing illinois that was going in that direction. at least a dozen others stopped in its tracks today by the supreme court but there's still other cases pending. charlie gasparino sticking around. what did you think of his remark s? >> compelling and effective and basically what i thought he'd do. use this as a sort of spring board to just how horrible these other cases are. and people, when you start looking at those cases, you start picking them apart. you say, oh, he's being

prosecuted for that? this will have some -- it'll help him on the margins and other stuff that will help him on the margins is the other stuff he brought up, the border, inflation, interest rates the economy .x trump years were demon strategies blizzard warnings better than now. he can articulate some of that. he's not as sharp as four years ago but about 40 times sharper than president biden. one thing i wonder though, and i think maybe this was a strategic mistake from him, the fact he didn't debate desantis and haley and all them, gives biden an out not to debate him. neil: i don't think there'll be debates at all. >> no, i think biden will say it's a tragedy and you'll see how much joe biden and sort of intellectually and emotionally

how he slipped. neil: all this legal pile on and all this and he's now beating the president in the polls. but not by much. you wonder is that a reflection on him, donald trump, or relatively close with the issues you raised? >> i think it'll be close. i was at a meeting with a dinner party and not representative but these were all mainly moderate to progressive types and suburban voters that would generally could vote -- would vote republican in this one. not progressive but just moderate republicans and progressive compared to me. that's a whole different story. to the man and woman, they went

around the room and really liked nikki haley and said they really hate biden but couldn't vote for trump. neil: just sit out? >> i don't know. dollars to doughnuts, see migrants running across the border and if you walk by and take the train and like i do from connecticut to grand central, walk by the roosevelt hotel and see what mayor adams turned, this is like bedlam. neil: no matter what people think of him personally, these are issues gnawing and helping him politically? >> they're helping him but wonder who dollar comes to doughnuts and will the swing voters and the representative sample were swing types, will they press the button for him? not because they don't think think. donald is very crass. he rubs people the wrong way in his rhetoric. see it in his twitter feed or truth social. there's something about him

that's emotionally sort of out there that neil: but is more money going to stick with nikki haley or after tomorrow night they're done? >> i think they're gone now. i would be so surprised if there was more money. neil: no labels candidate? >> 50/50. she believes what she's saying and donald trump is an existential threat and so is joe biden. what do you do? neil: doesn't feel any loyalty to the republican party and rnc changed and controlled by donald trump and she's not beholdenned to the rnc play. >> i get two voices, some say yes to that that she has no allegiance and some people i talked to republican advise saying she's not running on no labels. neil: amazing. charlie, as are you. thank you very much. he is the best in the business, my friends. go right now to the big money show, brian to take the lead right brian: hey there, neil. thank you, and hello, everyone. i'm brian brenberg. jackie: i'm jackie jackie