money for the last two or three years and a good guardrail against currency and the basement and the federal deficit can't continue to grow at this rate without the dollar being de-valid and it's got a deal deal of speculative appeal for people like you and even people like me and place f speculator putting money and the governmental value getting the basement i think. it's very valuable. liz: george, great to have you, thank you. stocks are not down today. look at dow up 231 points, green on the screen for the major averages and tomorrow, parallel groups billionaire david rubinstein. larry: hello, folk, i'm larry

kudlow and kamala harris flubbed the most important question of the campaign. that's the subject of the riff. kamala harris flubbed the most important question of the campaign and a big hat tip to my long time friend berry york, the veteran ace columnist of the washington examiner. byron referring to the economy, which of course is the most important issue in the campaign and that was the first question of the debate and "when it comes to the economy, do you believe americans are better off than they were four years ago"? byron york's key point about kamala's answer was that there was virtually they're there. harolded $50,000 startup business startup. you should the current tax cut law and new business owners can deduct most early stage payroll

in equipment cost. many small business startups are spent for 2,000 at least for the beginning. in other words, it's a poorly thought out plan. and of course you never mentioned depot sal to repeal virtually all of the high successful trump tax cuts including the 100% immediate expensing bonus for the purchase of new machinery and equipment. that bonus depreciation is one of the most powerful pro growth policies for a large, small, and new businesses and looks like harris would repeal it. plus the so called economic plan with a top income tax rate to 39.6%, which is what most subsycesful new and small business -- successful small

business plans and small business cost deduction embodied in the trump plan. it's tackling the capital gains tax and more successful small business owners and on top of that, raises the estate tax, which is another reward. the successful small business owners. really one hand give us the other hand take ethnicity away and then -- takeeth away and then some. the cuts for business and here is mr. trump at economics club last thursday. >> we've ex-panned with the de-tax credit and 100% bonus depreciation and expensing for new manufacturing investments and reduction in the corporate tax rate from 21% to 15% solely

for companies that make their product in america. larry: real income and pre-pandemic and typical wonderful, and families of $6,400 during the trump years and almost five types as much as the biden harris game of only $1350. almost five times as much. now, the rest of kamala's so called plan is throwing out $25,000 of free money to buy homes and jacking up the price of new homes and out of reach for young americans. and she touts $6,000 refundable child tax credit, which amounts to a guaranteed basic income for those who do not work. that's her so-called opportunity economy. byron calls it now "the government giving people taxpayer money so they can pay higher prices". and byron notes, many economists

believe these kind of proposals are too big. they're too broad, not the best use of the money to help those who are most in need. that according to a wall street journal news story. by the way, mr. trump did double the child tax credits from one to $2,000. but on top of that, he slashed marginal tax rates for all individuals and of course all individuals thereby providing incentives to work and invest across the board. now, harris also wants to again increase the earned income tax credit and also fully refundable and hoppestliest mated $22 billion in fraudulent erroneous payments. economic speech in north carolina, harris proposed price

controls on food and groceries and who knows what else. an idea ridiculed by economists on both sides of the aisle. plus her package was estimated at $2 trillion. of course that's on top of the $2 trillion biden harris budget deficit that runs as far as the eye can see. she had never proposed a single reduction in federal spending and has never had an answer for record deficit spending, all of which would contribute to higher not lower long run inflation. but all that, mr. byron york concluded kamala harris never really answered the question when it cops to the economy, do you believe americans are better off than they were four years ago. for millions of people undoubtedly that answer is no. all right. that's my riff.

joining me now, dear friend kellyanne conway former council to president trump and host of here's the deal with kellyanne on fox nation. kellyanne, welcome. kellyanne, i'm going to read you this from our dear friend carl rove writing in "the wall street journal" regarding the debate: a catastrophic debate for trump. a catastrophic debate for trump and he names all kinds of reasons for that. i'm sure you've read it, what do you make of that? what do you think? has carl got it right or wrong? >> i think that the whole campaign is catastrophic for kamala harris in this way, larry. she is staying nerve nucleus nearer ick where people want januaryular and thinks she's funny where people are struggling and starving and trying to get facts and figures and byron york is right that if she doesn't get specific, she

can't undo what most economic centric voters think of her, which is she is part of what's i don't think many washington, spending money we don't have on things we don't need and didn't quite ask for, being all over the map when it comes to tactions assigned to, regulation and framing. i disagree with are you better off now than four years ago. that's reagan's famous question to jimmy carter and worked in 1980. doesn't work as well now and four years ago people were home and kids were out of school and stores were closed and everybody was masked up. the framing is, do you want trump 2019 or kamala harris 2019? in 2019, that's when trump's roaring economy was really taking off and excellent director in larry kudlow helping him do that. the stock that trump is promising at new york economic club last week is the stuff he did over the course of his first term and if we go back and look at trump 2019, that's when this country was rocking

and rolling. lowest unemployment numbers among some key cohorts that now are supporting him at higher levels than the republican haves seen in quite awhile. african americans, hispanic voters and young people. then again of course we have low interest rates, lower employment, high consumer confidence, high confidence among small business owners. the tax cut and jobs act from 2017 had really taken hold and our corporations that went from the highest in the lacd to lowest in lacd for the corporate tax cut were investing in their employees and benefits and innovation and research and development in their consumers so i think this is important because 2019 is going to be when kamala harris, the real kamala harris stood up. she ran for president on her own. she was for green new deal and medicare for all and she was fos without the charm and elizabeth warren without the eloquence. now, catastrophic, game

changing, ending, that's all armageddon conversation and i think there were opportunities for president trump going to kamala harris. when he goes all the time at the stump. it's been what he said at the end going so important for americans. what have you done for me lately? you've been there for three and a half years. larry, if she has a plan, let's see it now. call on the 25th amendment and go be the president and go do your plan now. larry: one thing carl sites in his article of catastrophic debate for trump, carl says that trump didn't link her to biden. let me play a very quick clip that happened early on in the day. what he does link her biden. here it comes. >> she doesn't have a plan. she copied biden's plan like four sentences like run, spot, run. four sentences that it just oh, we'll try and lower taxes. she doesn't have a plan.

remember this, she is biden. larry: so, kell anne, i agree -d at the top, she couldn't answer the -- are you better off than you were four years ago and it was a lot of word sac salad stuf and spend more money, $2 trillion and annual incomes and business deductions and we need business tax increase and trump linked her to biden and as you say that at the end of the debate and it was a hay maker and hard button on that and three and a half years and i'm prepared to say that some missed opportunities and i don't think my friends and yours carl rove is right. i don't think it's a catastrophe and i'm looking at polls that say it's not a catastrophe including the pay to play

betting polls that basically say it was still even where they were before. >> this is donald trump's race to lose. fundamentals still favor him. the fundamentals aren't just money. she's got plenty of that and going to be the messenger and if the messenger is not credit card and will believable and if you're not completely sure of what that is, the poll over the weekend and said that they need to know more about her and 18% said they need to know more about donald trump. there's nothing else to know about donald trump. we plowed all that ground and talking about donald trump's convictions and we all want to know, we want people to talk about our convictions and our convictions is that we want to feel secure and safe and prosperous. this nonsense about a kamala harris opportunity economy should not be trusted and she's aware there's no such thing that destroyed the economy and electric vehicle mandate withs

out of control government spending with the supply chain crisis and needs to eat and own all the failings and flailings of the biden harris white house. i'll do you one more, larry, i don't think we should mentioned biden once more and we should too. this is a harris economy and harris border crisis and this is harris with iran, harris with hamas and harris in ukraine and harris with the up tick in crime and violence and harris moving to account for those 13 families from afghanistan to the vic tips of crime, the families are saying what does she mean that crime is down? not in our family where we lost a loved one. this is incumbent and not the insurgent and she's not the underdog. she is the person that wants us to believe we should have four to eight more years of the same. every single poll says it's not true. this is more important for the battle of her and she needs that debate and doesn't exercise nose

muscles and we don't know anything about her: larry, when the 3:00 a.m. call comes to the commander in chief, you don't have advisers stuffing your head with clever sound bytes and pad lum. you don't have notes in front of you and have to make crack decisions and the worst thing a woman in power and authority could do is be wishy washy, shape shifting and flip-flopping and opaque. larry: i don't think she answered the question and agree with you and byron. kellyanne conway, thank you very much. februaries, switching gears, how hard will it be for americans if the trump tax cuts expire? we're just talking about this. we have hillary vaughn live from capitol hill. hillary, you're famous for talking about this very subject. what can you tell us? reporter: larry, if the tax cuts expire and nothing replaces it, millions of americans are going to owe uncle sam a lot more money on tax day and money that

a lot of americans don't have because inflation is causing them to live paycheck to paycheck. the tax foundation did an analysis of what could happen if the cuts expire and going to make $165,000 and paying nearly $2500 more in taxes and a family of five bringing in about $200 awe year would may more than $7,000 more in taxes so republicans in congress want to re-up the tax cuts and jobs act but democrats say not so fast. they want vice president kamala harris' tax plan to replace it. economies previewed for senators what impacts that would have on the economy if trump's tax cuts hit the chopping blocks and harris' tax hikes kicked in. >> 62% of households will face a tax hike if the tax cuts and jobs acts are allowed to expire. this is not something folk cans ignore. this is going to be very meaningful. >> we had members asking hem what would they do if taxes increase in 2026, which they

could assume a number of things would happen. that 66% said they would increase prices, which you can imagine is problematic with the current inflation in the environment. >> it's a big difference between trump and harris' tax plan comes down to hiking taxes on the rich and harris wants to raise taxes on the wealthy and corporationss and trump does not. >> but no surprise the millionaires and billionaires are wining they cannot -- whining they cannot afford to pay taxes. are they not making any money? >> senator, they're making plenty of money. >> are these 10,000 megamillionaires actually cash poor in are they living like mcellroys? >> no, they're not. i haven't seen many monks on yachts. no, they're not. reporter: larry, monks pay no taxes and rely on communities

for food and shelter and have no money of their own so maybe that's exactly what democrats want. larry. larry: i don't think they want more monks either. i want to say one thing. this business, remember the state and local tax deductions solved was limited to $10,000. it used to be unlimited, virtually unlimited, and that hit the well to do, which is why the middle income people, middle income wage earners had a bigger increase in tax savings than even the wealthiest did and that little factoid never is discussed to solve tax. anyway, hillary vaughn, thank you ever so much. and talk alaska the trump tax cuts and what might happen if they are completely repealed in just a moment. we have former treasury economist michael faulkender and scott hodge and cut low returns

and catch kudlow monday through friday on fabulous fox business. if you can't catch us at 4:0 for some reason, please, just text your favorite 9-year-old and she'll show you how to dvr the show and you'll never miss a tax cut, which is what i'm aiming for. be right back. ♪ (husband) we just want to have enough money for retirement. (wife) and travel to visit our grandchildren. (fisher investments) i understand. that's why at fisher investments we start by getting to know each other. so i can learn about your family, lifestyle, goals and needs, allowing us to tailor your portfolio. (wife) what about commission-based products? (fisher investments) we don't sell those. we're a fiduciary, obligated to act in your best interest. (husband) so how do your management fees work? (fisher investments) we have a transparent fee, structured so we do better when you do better. at fisher investments, we're clearly different. everybody wants super straight, super white teeth. they want that hollywood white smile. new sensodyne clinical white

provides 2 shades whiter teeth and 24/7 sensitivity protection. i think it's a great product. it's going to help a lot of patients. (♪) (♪)

(♪) (♪) investment opportunities are everywhere you turn. but at t. rowe price, we're letting curiosity light the way. asking smart questions about opportunities like advances in healthcare. and how these innovations will create a healthier world tomorrow. better questions. better outcomes.

larry: next up. what's going to happen if the trump tax cuts are in fact repealed? as hillary vaughn reported a little while ago. joining us, mike fall faulkender joining us -- mike faulkender and scott hodge, emeritus of the tax foundation but i begin with you, scott hodge. go ahead and repeal the trump tax cuts, repeal them. we just heard testimony on capitol hill 62% of americans pay higher taxes if you repeal the trump tax cuts. that's a big number.

a couple with two kids, 165,000 a year ask that's no class. they pay $2500 more and couple earning 200 a year and up l middle class paying 7500 or more. what do you make of that, scott hodge? >> it's a huge tax increase that automatically kicks in on january 1, 2026. tax increase that kicks in automatically. we're not seeing enough movement on capitol hill to take it quickly and biden and harris going to repeal much of it and that's quite worrisome for not average taxpayers and it's some of the hardest hit taxpayers if those tax cuts are allowed to be

repealed. larry: scott hodge, the repeal of the trump tax cuts, which they talk about, now the latest is the corporate tax from 21-28. i don't know that i believe that. that's what they're saying. what about, what have they said about the 100% bonus depreciation, which is such an important part of the incentives for new machinery and new equipment and new business. she wants to give it $50,000 for new business, brand new business startups and i fear the democratic victory would take that out and absolutely decimate capital spending and investment in this country. >> larry, you're absolutely right. one of the unfortunate aspects of the 2017 tax cuts is that the

bonus expensing provision is slowly being phased out and unless we renew it very quickly, businesses can't rely on it in order to reduce the cost of capital investment improving tools and machinery their workers need to be more productive. that hits usgdp and u.s. economic growth right where it country-specifics and that's the unfortunate aspect of all of this delay and lack of action that taxpayers deserve stability and predictability in a tax code is incredibly important for business owners to be able to understand what kind of investments they can make and how they're going to be able to pay for them and un-fornatalie right now, there's a great deal of uncertainty that i think will have a big impact on economic growth. larry: look at this story, this says 62% would pay higher taxes and some of the other studies

are higher than that. but basically middle income people, middle income and lower income people might. i mean, don't they get hit the hardest if you repeal that because they had the biggest after tax gains from this. it wasn't the rich that did the best. i mean, i just should put in the last segment remember, i mean the deduction was capped at $10,000 and if it were up to me, that's a blue state high tax thing and up to me, i would eliminate the deduction. that's me and my own opinion. i'd eliminate it all together and tell you the truth and raise money and add deeper individual tax cut. seconds to play you repeal the trump tax cuts, who's hurt the most? >> get a congressional hearing up today and it'll pass along an

increase in the higher prices and remember, it's not just that we're taxing people on the labor income and most small businesses file through the individual tax code and if you increase the tax rates, what you're doing is burying the small businesses that are already suffering from the massive regulation that the biden administration is putting in place on top of that, you're applying a higher tax rate and taking the 199 past three deduction goes to small businesses and they'll pass it onto lower and middle income households. the ones that have been crushed most by biden innation and getting harris inflation because they'll get passed along in the form of higher prices on everything we buy. larry: these refundable tax credits. trump raised the child tax credit from 1-2,000. she, ms. harris wants to take it to 6,000 and pes earned income

tax credit. at what point does this look like hard to account for. there's so much fraud and abuse in this stuff. also this guaranteed annual income and, mike, what troubles me, it's a guaranteed annual income that pays you not to work. >> that's absolutely correct. it's essentially going to incentivize people to drop out of labor force because there's no work requirements associated with it and at a time of labor short annals, the idea we need a couple -- shortages and the idea that we need a couple million because of child tax credit is not what our economy needs. larry: scott hodge, in general terms if you repeal the whole thing, what would that cost? remember what the numbers were in the tax foundation and gdp and i think the job losses are very substantial. >> lowering gdp by 2% and cutting capital spending goes down and incomes across the

board going down by about 1%. and the job losses are in the hundreds of thousands. that's part of what biden and harris want to co. when we modeled harris tax plan and found that it would cost the economy 786,000 jobs. they don't need a handout, they need a job. her plan and allowing them to end is cutting job asks that's the real crime in not taking action before the tax cuts expire. larry: what would the job loss be under the harris plan and 70 what did you say? >> 786,000. larry: that's 800,000 jobs. don't you think that's a big number? >> yeah. larry: holly cow. >> it's a really big number. larry: we're out of time, fellas. thank you ever so much.

fike faulkender and scott hodge, great stuff. independent voters look like they're moving towards trump during tuesday nate's i did bait. so it may not be the kansas city chiefs toosh fio that -- catastrophe that carl rove said it was and lee carter here on kudlow. 800,000 job klotz repeal the harris plan. terrific. 800,000. oh my god. meaux ♪ ♪

larry: peter doocy of fox news has every single detail. peter, what was the message? reporter: larra i the message, the big headline is that vice president harris talked about the debate on tuesday and every time she did, this group of very plugged in harris supporters in battleground north carolina are trying to flip and went crazy

cheering and she said she thinks the american people deserve a second debate that she took the stage minutes after trump posted on truth social there's not going to be a second debate between the two of them. there might be a bit of gainsmanship going on there. but she was pretty candid about the fact that she considers herself the underdog in this race and that basically con if i weres what unnamed aids are telling the new york times they don't think the race changed at all based on what happened on stage in philadelphia on tuesday night. we're noticing dramatically they talked a lot at the debate and advisers and interviewers talk about how kamala harris is preparing her values and reflect things she learned as joe biden's vice president. making it sound like the status quo and not making a ton of sense that the new harris rally

signs say a new way forward if there is a new way forward needed that they'd talk less about the current way, which is harris vp. winning the debate by a wide margin. >> she did. she won the debate and won the night. i had focus groups that we're saying she did a great job and did not win any votes. not one single person did i talk to that changed their mind based oen that debate. i found it fascinating because people said she did a great job and said she was all of these

things, and i was a person to vote for her. what they said, undecided vote and had nine of them in the room said i wanted to hear what she's going to do differently than joe biden. i wanted to hear what's different alabama the economy. i can't afford groceries now and used to be able to and what's she going to do to bring prices down. she didn't answer that very simple question for them, and it doesn't translate to votes so great that she had a good night but doesn't matter. larry: your brilliant press agent harris faulkner was on yesterday talking and we had results of republicans, independents and democrats we can put it on the full screen. the yellow independent line is moving republican, the blue line is flattening -- holy cow.

independents, very interesting. trump did pretty well. >> independents went lock and step with republicans the entire time with donald trump. he did not have that in 2020. we didn't see it at all. we saw it again now and i think it's a big difference. there's people that understand that more than 68% of americans want change from how things are right now. peter doocy is right. peep don't want the status quo. she's changed her slogan moving forward and that's what people want. how does she represent change? she hasn't answer that had question, and i think it's a really big problem for people going back for donald trump and feeling better and economy was better and immigration felt better and a lot of things felt better and they're ready to go back. larry: caroline downy, catastrophic event for trump.

>> with trump what he did well was the passion. it was a very scrappy but real emotional thing. larry: he had real hay makers. he hit her hard. you know that's right. that's a good way to put it. >> righteous anger. >> why a kans a catastrophe? win the night but not the vote and had a lot of passion and he's the change agent. isn't that -- >> media is highly exaggerating how much of a slam dunk harris had over him and like we said undecided were looking for more of an answer about how harris will govern and extremely polished but didn't give specifics as to how she won't be any different than biden's horrible economic leverage. larry: eyeball roll. take you by the stock in abc. who owns abc? >> you within all that happy with the moderators.

>> i don't think anybody was and incredibly biased and fact checked donald trump and not harris and on social media people were throwing stones at these guys and it was an embarrassment for them and embarrassment for abc and both of these points, what people wanted from kamala harris was to flush out some of the top line policy things that she sort of has thrown out there. and i think she can't so she doesn't so there's no meat on these bones so i say -- larry: my riff tonight and go back all of you and read there's a terrific column by bion york in the -- byron york in the washington examer and on this point -- examiner, on this point. >> she skirt it had entirely. larry: that was the question, are you better off than four years ago? you know, as a economic person, she didn't make it through. >> she can't, larry. the disappointment in donald trump as he has 1,000 facts on his side.

he just didn't even dredge up one to make -- dredge up one to make his case. that was discouraging and i heard byron donalds a head of time and other guys, tom cotton talking about trump and what he should say in the debate. it was a clear message ask trump didn't deliver the message. but, you know, guess what, i mean i don't think he's right. >> the thing that's interesting on this last point, trump really gave a detailed economic speech before the economics club that was covered worldwide and speaking in new york in midtown but a global speech and very good speech in my opinion. might not even like the speech but wouldn't begrudge the fact it was carefully put together speech with a number of policy details, and i can attest to the fact he knows those details so i was disappointed more details didn't come out. but on your point, about

independents and not winning the vote but in terms of what caroline was saying emotionally or impact of policy, those independents saying? did they, did you interview them? were they saying that it was about change or they don't like her or did like him or -- can you -- is there a way to narrow down on that? >> they said they were impressod with their preparation and smarter than they expected her to be, but she didn't address their concerns. larry: liz's point. >> didn't get to the heart of the matter or address the issues of the economy and didn't address the issues of immigration. but one point, you know, if you think back to the debate and very few thing it is remember what they said and remember two things. one remember the comments about the dogs that we can talk about that separately and the other they'll remember is that he said why haven't you done it in the last three and a half years.

when you went through at the end of the debate and went through and asked every single voter what stuck out to them, that was the thing. larry: that was a upper cut to the jaw that could have been a knockout in the 15th round. frankly. >> it was a stalemate at end of the day and frustrating for two reasons because trump has all the statistics and arsenal to brag about and the fact that there was record low unemployment for minorities under his administration and fact that real wages went up. he did not site any of that and similarly the kamala harris on the economy failed to extricate herself from biden. >> he doesn't have to say all those things and everybody in the room, right, left, middle, decided, undecided say that trump's economy was a better economy. he doesn't have to list facts. phacos aren't the message. >> they say kamala harris lies all the time about the trump economy. started off talking about worst unemployment since the great

depression. no, that was because covid shut down the economy. there's people out there listening to her saying oh, boy. she lied on that. larry: lied on abortion. >> she lied on everything. larry: opposed, he's opposed a federal ban on abortion. he's favored in vitro fertilization. does that matter she lied on a key issue and social issue that has emotional appeal and abc moderators and didn't call her on it. >> by the way, it's incredibly ignorant and shame on her she doesn't know that . >> four designated war zones and members stationed in iraq and

yemen. >> do people not know that. larry: smarter than you think. smarter than you think. >> it's interesting that you're giving a ball lapsed view and i understand some opportunities were a loss a fact or two going a long way and liz and i interview about that. it's just interesting and i looked at it for her saying okay, i've said 100 times on this set, she's not stupid and nobody should call her stupid. she's not a moron and nobody should call her that. i've said that many, many times. having said that, she proved that. the barfs low for her and -- bar was low for her and tactically she scored points but policy wise, emotionally, i like your emotional point very, very much.

this vote and that's okay. larry: all of you. please. i never like to stop. liz peek, caroline downey and lee carter, come back soon. coming up, today, here's a beauty, it's a beauty. attorney general merrick garland said ready for this, the department of justice only has one rule for democrats and republicans, only one rule. no weaponization. nothing of the sort. really? fox news legal analyst kerri urbahn will have something to say on that. i'm just going to listen. we'll be right back. liberty mutual customized my car insurance so i saved hundreds. with the money i saved i thought i'd get a

wax figure of myself. cool right? look at this craftmanship. i mean they even got my nostrils right. it's just nice to know that years after i'm gone this guy will be standing the test of ti... he's melting! oh jeez... nooo... oh gaa... only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪

>> there is not one more for friends and another for foes. one rule for power and feel another for the powerless. one rule for the rich and another for the poor. one rule for deputies and one another for republicans. larry: quite extraordinary in my judgment. not a lawyer and quite extraordinary and joining us is a very good lawyer, kerri urbahn and fox news legal editor. kerri, thank you for helping us today. what do you make of what he said? >> i have no doubt that attorney

merrick garland believes what he said, but unfortunately his words are divorced from the reality of his department's accounting standards boards and, larry, i've made a list. just some examples of things that they've done over the last several ye years that made evere question its integrity particularly with respect to how this department treats republicans and conservatives. start with the parents, investigating angry parents at school board meetings. remember that one? attorney merrick garland directed the division that's normally responsible for investigating terrorism offenses to look at angry parents a the school board meetings who are worried about their kid's education. how about this, for the first time in history, doj is now prosecuting people who blow off congressional subpoenas and, oh, what do you know, only happens to be trump aids that they're prosecuting on that front. how about the fact they didn't prosecute any of the blm protesters who destroyed washington dc in cities across

the country but vigorously wen after pro life actives who -- activists in chalk on a sidewalk in washington dc said preborn black lives matter and a three judge panel in that case here in washington said that the department of justice was selectivity enforcing the law. against these folks. selectively and of course let's not forget that someone trying to murder brett kavanagh now and hasn't gone to trial and won't till next year yet somehow they managed to push through all the cases against donald trump and speaking of the supreme court all of them showed up at justice's home and they're there's a log in the books that protects against that and there's a list that goes on and on. i could be here all day. larry: kerri, great reporting and great reporting and i don't

know, merrick garland has been a huge dis-about. kerri urbahn, everybody. the best of the best. tock marke now down 23%). this is happening people. where there are so few certainties... (laughing) look around you. you deserve to know. as we navigate a future unknown. ...

your memory is an amazing thing, but sometimes it can start to slow down. but did you know prevagen can help keep your memory sharp? the secret is the powerful ingredient, apoaequorin, originally discovered in jellyfish and found only in prevagen. in a clinical study, prevagen was shown to improve memory in subgroups of individuals who were cognitively normal or mildly impaired. stay sharp and improve your memory with prevagen. prevagen. in stores everywhere without a prescription. if your business needs a new application, then developers will have to write code. a lot of code. if an application needs to be modernized, then you'll need time, resources...

and caffeine. if this sounds daunting, then use watsonx code assistant. built with ibm's granite code model, it's ai designed to multiply tivity, so you can generate code quickly. ibm. let's create.

larry: so, are you better off than you were four years ago? kamala harris never really answered that question, and she showed a very poor economic plan anyway, so i'll answer it. the answer is no. we're not better off. however, when it comes to elizabeth macdonald, my answer is always yes. liz: well, larry, we're better off just watching you. larry: [laughter] liz: didn't mean to pu