tv The Five FOX News October 18, 2011 2:00pm-3:00pm PDT
2:00 pm
>> yeah. if you are hearing this, and you don't get fbn. >> ho, ho, ho. demand it. >> this goes way beyond new hampshire. captioned by closed captioning services, inc >> dana: hello, everyone. it's 5:00 on the east coast and this is "the five." i'm danson with andrea tantaros, eric bolling, bob beckel, greg gutfeld. we have news to get to tonight. first, obamacare chaos. the president and republicans bumping heads over a major healthcare provision in his reform bill. plus, after five years in captivity, an israeli soldier is history. there was a prisoner release. what the president says now about negotiating with terrorists.
2:01 pm
susan sarandon calls someone a nazi. we'll have that and much more. "the five" starts right now. ♪ ♪ >> dana: to the top story, it seems is there is some divide in the issue about healthcare provision that president obama put in healthcare reform. let me set it up for you. last friday, the administration said it would be pulling the plug on what is called the class act. this part of the bill was to offer affordable long-term care to elderly and disabled. but now, the president himself is saying he cannot support it. he is withdrawing the program, but while republicans on capitol hill want to take it out, the white house says no, let's not repeal it. the democrats, this used to be their big liberal darling. they loved it. we have sound from 2009. which they were talking about
2:02 pm
how it was fully paid for. >> certain colleagues on the other side of the aisle argued the class plan would lead to financially unstable entitlement program and rapidly decrease the federal deficit. that is not accurate. >> the cbo has scored this. this is completely paid for over 75 years. over 75 years. >> cbo said our future, decades and decades in the future paid for. i didn't use a penny of that money. >> dana: oops. because now they admitted they can't do it. in fact, secretary sebelius said that despite the best analytical effort, "i do not see a viable path forward for class implementation." greg, what is happened here, they have run in mathematical law they can't divide. >> greg: math does not do hope and change.
2:03 pm
math gives you something to you straight. i feel something coming on. it might be a torturee tortureed metaphor. this is government equivalent of 10-year-old girl not getting a pony for christmas. she was promised this. it was great to dream about. but at the end of the day they realize they can't afford it, it won't fit in the backyard. kathleen sebelius is the 10-year-old. reality is the parent. >> dana: one of the things that happened was that when they said it was paid for, this was, it gave comfort to lot of conservative democrats on the fence about obamacare anyway but they were told this would be a way to reduce the deficit in the long run. a lot of people including the cms acms actuary, person running medicaid services said it wasn't sustainable, but they rammed it through anyway. now you have this, supreme court about to look at it. andrea, some said this is the beginning of the end of obamacare. >> andrea: it is. it wasn't one provision to reduce the cost, dana. class act accounted for
2:04 pm
according to the administration almost half of official deficit reduction for obamacare. this is a big deal. with greg's tortureed metaphor this is what is confusing. obama promising to give kathleen sebelius the pony. even though they haven't figured out how to pay for it. your point, absolutely. we don't know what the supreme court is going to do in a couple of weeks we'll know what parts they will take up. look at the mandate. what else do they look at. everything they have told us about obamacare is false. you can keep your doctor, if you want. not true. it bends down the cost curve. not true. we saw the premiums rise. now, again, it will bring down the deficit. no. that is not true. it will bankrupt long-term care. >> juan, the idea of long-term individual is not bad one. you can choose as you are an individual, consumer if you want to buy into it. the problem is the way it was set up, healthy people weren't
2:05 pm
going to spend money out of the own pocket to do this. $70 billion evaporates like that. they have a problem. >> juan: they don't have a problem. they are looking for solution. to get back to my friend's fortureed metaphor, ronald reagan used to tell a joke i just loved, which was about a kid seeing a pile of manure and saying good news, there must be a pony in here somewhere. in fact, this is a pile of manure, because sebelius and the administration say we don't know how to pay for this. we are having a problem with the numbers. cbo says it's neutral. looking for a way to fund it. liberal advocacy groups are upset with the white house. they think the white house pulled the rug out from under them. they were supporters, like you saw in the clip, senators and
2:06 pm
advocacy groups, aarp for seniors said this is a good thing and why we want obama healthcare proposal. let me just say, the american people are not with republicans when they say repeal it. republicans again are overreaching. going crazy. american people like this stuff. >> andrea: but the administration gave us a pony unpaid for covered in manure. are you happy with that? >> juan: cbo thought they had a way to do it but they don't. >> andrea: government shouldn't get in the business. >> juan: right, leave it to insurance company so they rip you off. >> dana: getter rick in here. when the actuary says it's not workable and then they find out nine months later it's unworkable. whose fault is it? republicans who said initially it wasn't workable or who was sold a bill of goods? >> eric: again, we go to this all the time. nancy pelosi saying pass the bill and we'll find out what is in it. ha, ha. but that was true. we find out there is a bunch of manure in it. $80 billion worth of it in this one.
2:07 pm
it happens to be 40% of what the savings were supposed to do. when you buy a car there is a lemon law. three things go wrong with it. obamacare is a lemon. it doesn't bend the cost. $86 billion cost we didn't know would be in there. they front-loaded so it didn't look like it was in there then you have whether or not the individual mandate is constitutional. >> dana: lemon law is a good metaphor. >> greg, no, no, no. it's not a lemon. it's a pony. i'll tell you why. juan is right. if you promise america a pony, hard to unpromise that pony. republicans are in a bind now, because they've got to come up with their a terntive to a pony. that the public says okay, i get it. now they are getting to the point they are accepting healthcare. >> juan: how about this -- >> andrea: the pony is too expensive. we have can't afford a pony.
2:08 pm
>> juan: let me say, everybody is for this pony. people like the idea that insurance companies can't throw you out because of previous conditions. they like the idea that the kids can stay on until they're 26. >> andrea: but there is no cost efficient way to do this. >> juan: they like a third of the american people who don't have coverage can get it. >> dana: that is not what we're talking about, juan. what we're talking about in particular is a provision in the bill that might have sounded good to some but was not sustainable. they, the chief actuary told them, this will not work. they used it anyway to cover for deficit reduction, which is not going to exist. house budget committee chairman paul ryan said this. to hide the true cost of the healthcare overall, the leaders of the democratic party loaded it with gimmicks and double accounting. even democratic senator called at it ponzi scheme bernie madoff would have been proud of. i think then to take the pony one step further, you can get a pony. when you're a kid, can i have a puppy, can i have a pony or
2:09 pm
something? the kid takes care of it for a week and then guess whose pony it becomes? the parent's pony. >> juan: dana, euell you're saying is it isn't working. that's what the white house is saying. they don't have the money. >> dana: no, no, no. they are not saying -- >> juan: you not getting any idea -- >> andrea: they're backing off of this, juan. he is on the other side of the issue. wait a minute. his own secretary came out on friday and said we cannot pay for it. >> juan: correct. >> andrea: obama press secretary one of them said i don't care. >> juan: no, they said we don't want to repeal it. >> andrea: why not? >> juan: they're trying to find a solution to make it work, as opposed to republicans who don't want anything to work and use it for a political advantage to beat up -- >> andrea: they will go bankrupt. >> eric: you are having the discussion after the bill game law? a lot of us pointed this out before the vote, before the
2:10 pm
bill was law. now we're saying we'll find out there is a lot more. guess what? $86 billion pile of poop. i guarantee there are two or three more down the road. >> juan: all you do is hammer and complain and criticize. what do you hear from republicans? >> dana: we are off to a great start! we discussed romney, perry and the economic plan on "the five." now ron paul has one of his own. "the five" will dissect it next. e-mail us at thefive@foxnews.com. ♪ ♪ ♪
2:11 pm
2:14 pm
♪ ♪ >> andrea: welcome back to "the five." the g.o.p. candidates are prepping for another debate showdown tonight. the question is at this point in the race, is every debate just as important as the next? i would argue yes, greg, that it's very important. you see the debates make or break candidates. rick perry, namely. i think the focus tonight is
2:15 pm
on herman cain to see does he have the policy chop, or a flash in the pan. >> greg: debates are great for people like cain who don't have any money. it's their way of becoming more and more popular. but the real question is what do you call those things? do you call them podiums or lecterns? >> juan: lectern. podium is the foot. >> greg: podium is the platform that the lectern is on. lectern is not a pulpit. i'm tired of answering that question. >> andrea: eric, i want to ask you there is feedback on the receiving the debate. and we go back and forth saying why is my guy on the end, rick santorum. cnn is saying let's look at the polls and place them strategically on the stage based on how well they are doing. romney gets center stage, perry on the left, cain on the right, ron paul on the other side of cain followed by rick santorum and on and and on. no offense, producers, but
2:16 pm
trying to get really good ratings. >> eric: it's becoming a show. look, you can take it with polling or money raised and you can almost get the same set up. santorum, bachmann, who is the other guy? ron paul. got it. what a great, great -- 100% right. great way to bring yourself out. i don't agree with you. i don't think it matters who wins the debate, regarding how much money they've raised. gingrich you can argue has won all the debates. >> andrea: what are you watching for tonight? >> dana: this is the fifty debate in six weeks. in some ways, it will be seeing snare rowing down. cain has policy depth but needs polish. people say i like him, i like what he has to say. do i think he could represent
2:17 pm
america well in the oval office? that is a question. polish does make a little bit of a difference. the other thing i'm going to watch for, i think perry might have a strong debate tonight. he needs to have a really strong one. >> juan: what makes them break out, that is the question? how can he break out? he was supposed to have a strong debate last time. he came out flat. >> eric: he breaks out with $15 million in the war chest. >> juan: he has that. but you know what that is for? that means he can last and wait for romney to stumble or somebody else to fall back hopefully. from his perspective, herman cain goes down and get some of that back. but he is waiting. you know what is interesting to me, i saw numbers the other day that said a quarter of the american people have seen any of these debates. i mean, like people wait -- and no democrats are watching apparently. it's a republican audience. >> dana: democrats in white house are because they come out and attack -- >> juan: but basically -- >> greg: like the n.b.a. nobody watches until the playoffs. gawps i'm a big --
2:18 pm
>> dana: i was asking around, what are you looking for and a republican said wake me when the primary is over. >> juan: it has been, for us, though, the table, it's been really, i think a game-changer. i think it's hurt rick perry. i think the debate hurt rick perry. i think if you -- >> dana: helped romney. >> juan: helped romney. if you look at people like ron paul, there are a lot of people -- >> dana: newt gingrich. >> juan: i didn't know the aspect existed in the party. >> dana: newt gingrich and rick santorum. >> it's hurt michele bachmann. tonight, i think that cain has to have an a-plus performance. everybody will be watching him to say one, can he raise money after this? can he sustain an the mow men tm or is this a big book tour bonn nan san antonio. >> dana: another thing, being from western state this is cosponsored by the western business round table. the media, of which i'm now part of, focuses a lot on new york and d.c., florida and a
2:19 pm
lot of l.a. all the other states in the country seem to get ignored there are specific issues regarding property rights and taxes that are specific to the western states. hold on -- >> juan: people in iowa -- >> andrea: wait, we have to get to this. an issue herman cain needs to talk about tonight, we can agree on, the most populist message of all. take a look. >> ♪ imagine there's no people ♪ ♪ i couldn't if i tried ♪ ♪ but to me ♪ it's so much more >> andrea: now that is a position even those wall street protesters and drunk young kids late at night and bob beckel, a democrat can get behind. >> greg: i'm on a no-carb diet. >> eric: pizza? >> andrea: you still like it.
2:20 pm
>> greg: he made that song better. terrible song, he improved it. >> eric: michele bachmann was in the lead and took heat on a debate. perry was in the lead and he took heat. herman cain was in the lead and taken the heat. mitt romney hasn't taken heat in the debate. it would be nice to see -- >> andrea: that is a -- [ overtalk ] >> dana: okay. but i also think you could say that somebody like jerry seis who walks for "wall street journal" column look at number and says the support for perry is more wide-spread. the others have gone up and down, beckel might say it's only 23% approval he has remained steady. >> andrea: i agree. >> dana: if he starts to consolidate the gain, we could see -- >> juan: how do you consolidate 23%? >> dana: from being able to say -- so take the losses from others and make it his gain. >> juan: he could. i think -- >> andrea: don't count anybody out just yet. up next, israeli soldier held captive by hamas. for a number of years is an
2:21 pm
exchange for more than 1,000 palestinians. we'll talk about what kind of precedent this sets when dealing with terrorists next on "the five." we'll be right back. ♪ ♪ welcome idaho, where they grow america's favorite potoes. everyone knows idaho potatoes taste great. but did you know they'reood for you too?
2:22 pm
they're high in vitamins and potassium. and idaho potatoes are now certified to carry the heart checkmark from the american heart assoction for foods low in saturated fat and cholesterol. so they're good for my family, and for yours. heart smart idaho potatoes. always look for the grown in idaho seal.
2:25 pm
♪ ♪ >> eric: welcome back to "the five." after being held by hamas for five years, israeli soldier gilad shalit is back home in exchange for his return. an unprecedented prisoner swap. israel agreeing to release more than 1,000 palestinians. going to be a first, two sets of releases, half now, half later. israel willing to -- they've done this before, but they are willing to deal with terrorists groups. good or bad idea?
2:26 pm
>> andrea: i don't think it's a good idea. you are right, they have done it in the past so the precedent is always there. if you are hamas and you know there is more prisoners that need to be released you say okay, i'm going to go out and kidnap more israelis so i can do this hostage bartering type situation in the end -- it might be good right now short-term to get this soldier back. the whole country, mandatory to join the army and israel. a lot of parents are concerned. what if it's my boy? but in the end, i don't think it's good move. hamas is a terrorist organization and israel said we are not going to negotiate with those who have blood on their hands. these prisoners were responsible for killing israelis and a lot of them go back to killing israelis once they are released. not a good plan. >> greg: i'm torn. you know, this is a human being, soldier, you and you want to do everything you can to get him back. and, you know, just shows that the israelis bend over backwards to do what they can for their people. but it does remind me of october 1989, when the dallas
2:27 pm
cowboys traded hershell walker for what was it? eight draft pick and five players. lop-sided trade. >> juan: didn't work out. >> andrea: did any of them return to terror? >> greg: no. [ laughter ] >> dana: 60% of the prisoners -- this is not unusual, but across the world when it comes to war on terror in this case 60% return to the battlefield and recaptured again. whereas i think it's, where we can look at this and say gosh, they should haven't negotiated, 80% of the israeli people approve of this deal. gilad shalit has been through hell. in 2006, that war was fought largely over him. and his capture. so i think that netanyahu, who is not shy at all about fighting terrorists and standing few he for himself ands country, if 80% agree with it, it was the right thing to do. >> eric: before his release, mr. shalit was required to do an interview for palestinian
2:28 pm
television. take a look, we're going to roll video of that. do we have a shot of this, guys? listen to this. >> translator: yes, it was long years. i was thinking i was going to stay for many more years. >> what do you do while in captivity? >> translator: i missed my family and i missed my friends. i want to talk to them and tell them about my life in captivity. vy a lot to tell. >> eric: while we talk about this, juan, one of the conditions for his release is that interview. but there were pictures that we found. palestinians are saying this is not true. but apparently there were some people, some guards -- look at that. that is him doing the same interview. why would you negotiate, if you're israel, why would you negotiate with these people? >> juan: let me say something. this is untenable. from the united states' point of view, i know what, i understand the politics of it for netanyahu. i agree with greg, it's a human being. if it's my child, i want my kid back. it understand.
2:29 pm
but this is a bad situation. if anything, isn't this time for israel and palestinians to finally do something? basically the palestinians and hamas have said they're going to engage in more kidnapping to get more israelis and more prisoners. this is like -- and you don't see any gift from the israelis, and whatever the united states and obama administration say let's do something. >> eric: hold on, hold on. >> juan: you are missing the point. eric, give in terms of let's negotiate. let's do a deal. >> dana: netanyahu said he would. >> juan: but he won't. >> andrea: he would in front of the u.n. >> eric: palestinians are asking for the u.n. to recognize their country as state. does this help or hurt that? >> dana: it hurts -- it hurts them -- it might help them with some of their neighbors. it doesn't help them with the united states, who has been the driving force of trying to get them to come together. i'm curious about the timing of this, though. it's right before, you know, palestinian tries the maneuver at the u.n.
2:30 pm
a couple of months ago we had, a little bit, four months ago last spring between netanyahu and president obama. you remember that rift? it seems to me that they will look back on this in 30 days or 60 days and say ahh, maybe that was the beginning of some sort of -- >> andrea: a lot of this is p.r. if you talk to the middle east experts. a lot of it is p.r. israelis lose p.r. war to palestinians. they say they will use the maneuver to say a lot of prisoners released, some of them were israelis. some of them, we represent all different kinds of ethnicities, so we really are on the right side of the issue, which isn't true. >> eric: we have to leave it there. sorry. coming up, susan sarandon under fire tonight and rightfully so i might add for her very offensive reference to pope benedict. we have her comments next on "the five." ♪ ♪ ♪
2:32 pm
[ jim ] i need to push out a software upgrade. build a new app for the sales team in beijing. and convince the c.e.o. his email will find him... wherever he is. i need to see my family while they're still awake. [ malennouncer ] with global services from dell, jim can address his company's i.t. needs through custom built applications, cloud solutions and ongoing support in over 100 countries. so his company sees results. and jim sees his family. dell. the power to do more.
2:35 pm
i'm bret baier in washington. president obama is riding his bus through another state that could figure prominently in the re-election effort. tonight on "special report," ed henry is in virginia to show us how the president spent one part of his trip ripping republicans for opposing his jobs plan/stimulus package. and another part trying to get republicans to cooperate. we will get a live response from the senate minority leader mitch mcconnell is the president making headway against republicans with the latest pitch? carl cameron is in las vegas tonight covering the latest republican presidential candidate debate. he will have the very latest from the campaign trail. how some candidates are trashing others, while others are trying to build themselves up. jim angle reports the obama administration is apparently not yet willing to give up entirely on one entitlement program in the president's healthcare law that has been underfire. "special report" from washington starts at 6:00 eastern. now we'll send it back to new york and my leagues with "the five." ♪
2:36 pm
♪ >> juan: i think they played that music for me. welcome back to "the five." susan sarandon is making headlines today for comments she made about pope benedict xvi. talking about her movie "dead man walks" sarandon said she sent a copy that the book that the movie was based on to the pope. now here is where the controversy comes in. when she tried to clarify which pope she sent the book to, she said, "the last one, not this nazi we have now." now, let me just say this. this is clearly, patently offensive. nobody here is going to defend it. greg, am i right? >> greg: i'm not going to defend it. >> juan: thank you, brother. we don't need any trouble in here today. so the question is then, why would she say such a thing? historically, he is german,
2:37 pm
all young germans were enlisted in the nazi movement at one time. but according to the vatican, he went because it was going to hurt his family. but then did not participate and later defected. this is all -- >> dana: i don't think she gave it that much thought. >> andrea: someone in hollywood doesn't use their brain? deans it was actually quite logical what you said but i think she threw it out there, because "nazi" a word they use for anyone they disagree with. they watered down the term so much. >> juan: good point. so what is she disagrees with? >> dana: she wants attention she went to occupy wall street. no one recognize who had she was. these are major acts of desperation. >> greg: they thought she was carrot top. her comment stands for contempt for normal human beings. she has lived in a celebrity bubble all her life and feels compelled to say whatever she wants. he is bitter. she likes to hang out in east hampton and expects all of to us stay at the hampton inn. a rot on the, horrible person. she is mad because her son,
2:38 pm
tim robins dumped her. >> juan: her son? >> greg: it was a joke. >> eric: she had a bad month she spent the last couple of weeks at the wall street protest, sidin siding with the l street protesters. but look, she dishonored 1.2 billion people in one minute in the stroke of one utterance out of her mouth she needs to go away. >> andrea: hold on. just i don't think she dishonored anyone. >> andrea: juan, where is the, where are the comments from hollywood? and everybody else in the country coming out on the left. telling her to be quiet, condemning her for what she said. we saw hank williams junior eviscerateed -- >> dana: he lost his monday night football slot. >> juan: he should have. >> andrea: her agent won't return calls because she's playing ping-pong with her 21-year-ol21-year-old boyfriend. >> juan: you watch what happens with advertisers. there will be some reaction. >> eric: michael moore will hire her for the next film. >> juan: you never know.
2:39 pm
>> greg: why would you want an apology from her? that is getting a back rub from a transient, it's better for him than is it for you. why would you care if they're sorry or not? rotten person. >> andrea: because of the double standard. it's the point. when liberals say something like this, everybody yawns. when conservatives do, they're crucifyed. >> juan: so lot's go to another -- let's go to another moment of religious controversy in america tonight, vanderbilt university. where the government is now saying hey, wait a second. it's discriminatory for religious organizations not to allow people of other religions to take over leadership of these -- wait a second -- religious organizations. so, is this a problem? >> andrea: i think it's a problem, yes. why can't -- the group in question are christian groups. so they are saying look, we are christians. we want to worship together. we're not trying to be discriminatory but it doesn't make sense for atheist to join
2:40 pm
our group. that makes sense. when i tried to join the soccer club in college they wouldn't let me either. >> juan: that's foolish. you can come play with me. but i'm saying, wait a second, if it's the policies, you are supposed to be nondiscriminatory. why are you smiling? if it's the policy that is supposed to be nondiscriminatory, then you can't say hey, wait a second, jews, you can't occupy the leadership of our club. >> dana: i the reason we're having this conversation because atheists really want to work at a christian organization? no. they want to make a point. this is why we have to have laws and aclu can have something to do. >> juan: no, no, no. they can join, but the question is -- >> dana: we went through this when president bush had faith-base organization. we went through this. the supreme court upheld you can as -- maybe it wasn't the supreme court. it might have been the circuit held, upheld as a religious
2:41 pm
organization you don't have to hire somebody on nondiscriminatory laws. imagine this. if andrea right now went to a mosque to apply to be like the head of administration for the mosque, do you think would hire her for a second in no. do you think on "the five" we'd talk about how it was discriminatory they didn't allow her to work there? no. no one would care. but if it's against christians that's when people -- >> andrea: double standard. >> juan: i don't agree with this. you say if a black person goes to a white organization, you say well, he is not white. >> dana: not talking color. >> juan: we're talking about religion. points of difference and discrimination, don't you think? >> andrea: it's different. that is not the point. >> juan: okay. we settled it. thank you. coming up, a reality show inciting bad behaviors in adolescent girls? andrea will tell us. and that is -- >> andrea: i will? >> juan: greg agrees with it. he will tell us why next on
2:42 pm
2:43 pm
2:46 pm
♪ ♪ >> greg: welcome back to "the five." so is reality tv turning our female youth into something uncuth? a new study by the girl scout research institute which is where they invented the ta tagalong, found that shows like "real housewives" may lead to bullying among girls. take a look. >> [bleep] finger in my face. [bleep] in my face, too. >> okay. okay. >> don't [bleep] threaten me. [ yelling ] >> [bleep] [bleep] [bleep] >> whoa! >> eric: crazy.
2:47 pm
>> greg: america. the institute surveyed 1,000 girls and found reality tv behavior like hair-pulling, wine glass throwing and heaping blame on everything but yourself encourages the same in real life. programs that reward the behavior creates pint-size divas who see the world nothing more than a camera only focused on them no wonder there are scads of online bullies. parents checked out on drugs or absent altogether, the only role model yes is thick-lipped collagen junkie who swears like a meth head trucker. while talk show host bend over backwards to fake concern over bullying, the network perpetuates the behavior, conflict attracts eyeballs and eyeballs make money. when i was a kid, the family we looked up to was the waltons. they were dirt poor and they lived with goats, a milk cow. well, maybe it wasn't that different from "jersey shore." the cow spent less time on all
2:48 pm
fours. if you don't believe me, i'll throw a drink in your face. >> dana: mine was the engalls. i ran home every day to watch "little house on the parry." >> eric: there is no way you watched the waltons growing up. >> greg: i watched it and it confused me. it didn't know what era it was. they had a cow and a car. >> dana: my uncle has a car and cow now and it's 2011. >> greg: he probably lives on a farm. doesn't have a cow in his apartment. >> eric: can i point something out else? i think the study should go beyond women. i watch my son wat "rsey shore" and they mimic it all the time. >> dana: what kind of a father are you? >> eric: they love the show. juan on vacation, when i -- >> juan: on vacation, when i see the kids are watching and they watch this stuff and think it's fun and they think it's real and get in the soap opera aspect of it. it's crass and low behavior.
2:49 pm
that real housewife is a hit show. >> andrea: anybody watches that show. >> greg: here is the thing, though. >> juan: you love it. >> andrea: i have never seen it. according to the study that says the young girls are saying you have to lie to get what you want, so i'm just lying. >> greg: the difference between "jersey shore" and "housewives" is 20 years in age. the women perpetuate the bullying behavior when they should know better. it's purely because the cameras are focused on them. they are teaching kids, the more you act up, the more -- >> andrea: because if you don't bring drama each season you get kicked off. >> juan: the real housewives of washington where i live. the woman who snuck in the white house. >> andrea: salahi. >> juan: now she has run off with the drummer. >> greg: of journey.
2:50 pm
>> juan: what is it inspiring? >> dana: i live in d.c. and my friend was launching her clothing company called epiphany. a friend of mine, a democrat. we have been friends for years. so i go to this party. i stand next to a woman and i talk to her for a long time, she was lovely. i realize after a little bit one of my staffers walked by and said that is the real housewives of d.c. i said who? i had no idea what she was talking about. i forgot that the real housewives of d.c. was on and i think i kind of offended her, which i may have done again. >> eric: you go to dinner with the group and the wives say i hate that show. it's terrible. but they say see when so-and-so did this? then they go we should be the housewives. inspires reality star. >> greg: a study of midwestern teens and they say swearing leads, swearing on television leads to aggressive behavior in teens like a get away drug.
2:51 pm
>> juan: it is modeling, don't you think? i'm concerned the way young black people are presented on tv. you're either a rapper or a gangster or you are one of the people who tells the awful jokes with the "n" word constantly because they can't seem to be funny without that word. this is what a young black man looks like to white people? >> dana: we talk aboutengalls and waltons but huxtables. >> juan: i am the -- >> andrea: i am the sole voice -- i feel like bob. there are good shows out there "biggest loser" and one bright spot on mtv where they took the geek to make them feel like the most important person in the school. my mom yells at me all the time. she says can't you watch something a little more edifying? i say you know i study all the headache stuff all day long. the "wall street journal," studies, sometimes i just want a little novocain for the brain. and i want to feel better at myself. i look at these women, look, i don't have those problems. i'm not a botox creep.
2:52 pm
>> juan: that is the theory of the "national inquireer" that celebrities have money and fame but their lives are totally losers, screwed up, they can't control their marriages, their families. >> dan when you call the re you go.i. you connected all the dots. speaking of television, mcdonald's is launching an in-house channel? this is the greatest story ever. >> smartest marketing tool i have ever heard of. you are watching tv and bring a bag of chips, whatever you are eating, watching, not realizing how much you are eating. but you eat more than you would eat if you were just eating. >> greg: i once ate my dog. >> juan: what? >> greg: nothing. >> eric: how brilliant is that. eat more, watch tv. >> juan: what is on the channel? >> eric: it doesn't matter what is on it. >> andrea: local sports, human interest stories. mcdonald's has come under the gun by the administration to have healthier food so they're trying to make a family restaurant. >> dana: like the biggest loser at mcdonald's. >> greg: you know who is
2:53 pm
behind it? mark burnett who did "apprentic" and "singoff" so someone is powerful. >> juan: wait until michelle obama hears about this. it those have sub blemmal me -- subliminal messages in there. suggesting to eat more. >> andrea: mcdonald's is creating the jobs. the obama keeps feeding us. >> dana: hay got a healthcare waiver. >> juan: you know what? the supermarket that they have the subliminal stuff in there to make you buy stuff and go where fatty foods are and away from the milk and fresh fruit. it's not ra joke. that is the truth. >> greg: i know where i am going. to the tease. >> dana: nice! >> greg: coming up, i almost want a quick just for a day to do what a marriott employee did when he quit. the video is great. stay with us. we'll be right back. ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] to the 5:00 a.m. scholar.
2:56 pm
2:57 pm
i've got to tell susie ! the vending machine on elm is almost empty. i'm on it, boss. new pony sorry ! we are open for business. let's reroute greg to fresno. growing businesses use machine-to-machine technology from verizon wireless. susie ! the nding machine... already filled. cool bike. because the busine with the best technologyules. >> andrea: welcome back to "the five." >> dana: talk about going out with a bang, this video is going viral. a marriott employee quit the job with a marching band. take a listen. ♪
2:58 pm
>> i am here to tell you that i'm quitting. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> dana: his name is joey and he worked there for three-and-a-half years and employees are treated horribly, so he decided to bring in his marching band and make a statement so marriott has been having to deal with this. >> eric: this is setup. >> dana: of course. brought in a marching band. >> eric: that was the boss that goes on cue. everyone out. he goes i quit. >> andrea: why would marriott put out a statement to defend himself? not that we treat employees with respect -- >> eric: you buy it? >> andrea: based on marriott's response. >> greg: 9.1% unemployment and this guy is quitting with a band? you make me sick. >> dana: i admire him. he worked his way through
2:59 pm
school. just he said they were abusive. i don't know. marriott has a good reputation with employees. >> dana: okay. so we had another great story. a man who is 100 years old, he completed a marathon. the headline is funny it says damaged the self-esteem of millions. our colleague bob beckel was so inspired by this, greg, he decided he would give it a shot. he faked a heart attack. >> greg: there he is. >> dana: there he is today crossing the line. there is nothing bob beckel can't do. right, greg? >> greg: you are right. we've had 5,000 years of human civilization. so we didn't have to run 27 miles. >> dana: 26.2. >> greg: what are we doing? what a waste of time. i salute him. >> juan: is guy is 100? district lighten up. >> dana: eight hours to get it done. 5'8", 115 pounds. this is amazing to me. a vegetarian. i don't know how you have enough energy. >>
231 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on