a lot more on this. all of this on fbn. if you don't get fbn -- >> you have to demand it, neil. i don't a joke today. this whole thing with obama saying the rich don't pay their taxes is [bleep] i voted for guy and i'm a democrat. what a [bleep] the rich don't pay their taxes. let me tell you something, right? the n the united states of america, you can do anything you want. go for it. so then you go for it and then you make it. everyone is like [bleep] you. >> bob: c'mon, man. you know better than talk like that. get a grip. i'm bob beckel with andrea tantaros, eric bolling, dana perino and greg gutfeld. it's 5:00 in new york city. this is "the five." ♪ ♪ >> bob: now my friends you know the old complaint from

republicans. president obama always gets good press from the mainstream media. poor republicans get dumped on, blah, blah, blah. republicans whine about it, including my brothers and sisters at "the five." put down your crying towel and pick up a copy of the highly respected and independent study by the pew research center. they did exhaustive study. guess what? the press loves romney. he get better press coverage in ten of the last 15 weeks. president obama got more negative press than positive press in the entire 15 weeks. in fact, a week of positive coverage. put that in your pipe and smoke it. what do you say about that? >> eric: a lot of stuff to say about it. what they did is polled every time someone said something negative about president obam

obama. that was considered a negative piece on obama. we know there were four viable candidates taking shots at obama. number two, the gas prices have been -- the study was from january through april. the gasoline prices have been going up the entire time with the exception of last week. what doles you get? positive spin out of that? any way you slice it, all of them added up, four guys going after one, that's why -- when it's one-on-one like now, it's actually -- >> bob: i know all about four on one. >> dana: the discrepancy comes down to excellent p.r. work by the romney team. the president has bad facts. if they did the 15 weaks of coverage when he was running against the primary and clinton versus romney that would have been apples to apples. this is apples to oranges.

romney isn't responsible for anything. president obama is. the chickens are only coming home to roost. therefore when you have bad facts you have bad stories. he >> bob: obama wasn't responsible to 2008. >> dana: but that would have been the more accurate comparison. they did it in the last 15 weeks for both of them. it's not apples to apples. >> bob: they have gone in tank for romney. >> andrea: they didn't. >> greg: first, i want to address john lovitz. once you lose him, you lost america. he is the nation's windsock. if i was president obama i'd be nervous who will fall next. i don't know. who knows? >> bob: you and eric tie for the most, blah, blah blah, main stream media, obama. what do you say about this? >> andrea: look at the total of stories on gas prices. there have been four times as

many gas price stories underpresident bush than president obama. bob doesn't trust anything i say. i learned that. look at the politico jim handehei. he said are reporters biased? no doubt. it work at the "wall street journal," politico and all the reporters in a room, they will vote democratic. the guy that wrote "game change" said they don't like romney. last week, jake tapper, not a conservative, he acknowledged in 2008 the media jil wilted for president obama. these are three reporters admitting that the media slanted to obama and they don't like obama. >> bob: apparently i cut you off when you were going to make a joke. >> greg: no, i was making a point about the "new york times" admitting basking in the glow of obama election.

like the election was a motel rendezvous. my favorite part of the article the ombudsman admits, a strong current of skepticism holds that the paper skews left. that could be due to political views that creep to nonpolitical coverage and he says that the perception that it skews left is because it skews left. that is amazing. >> bob: is that a headline? we know they skew left. >> bob: so you just refuted your opening. >> bob: no. i just said that in the 2008 campaign, they skewed left. no question about it. i suspect they will again, too. this is ombudsman, now. aren't they hired to take on their own press? >> bob: that was a tough article. >> if you suspect they skew left, and you suspect they will skew left in the future,

why would they skew right for romney? you admit they don't want to run against romney. >> bob: right. they would prefer to run against santorum. romney a formidable candidate. no question. >> andrea: why would they help him win? >> eric: another thing that happened. the open mic flap when president obama leaned over and told medvedev to bring it back to putin because my next -- there were a lot of stories. and the main stream media couldn't ignore it because it was important. >> bob: there will be news every day. is there good news on the horizon? >> greg: it's how it was reported. if it was romney it would have

been supported more severely, to use romney's term than obama. for the media like the old commercial with imagin madge. they're not aware of the bias because they're soaking in it. palmolive. >> dana: i could use some now. i would love to make a couple of points. the "new york times," one reason that it matters, talking about the "new york times" and the ombudsman, that paper still is the one that sets the agenda for other things. every news producer reads the "new york times" and get ideas for stories and cover them later on. that is why it's powerful. i do think that social media changed a lot in conservative favor this time around. the peer pressure is immense among reporters. reporters write for one another. believe me. when they do that, if there is pressure, like that wasn't there. that's not true. that is not right. then they feel like they have to correct it right away not as trigger happy as they used

to be. that doesn't happen much anymore. >> bob: the times ran another story, that mitt romney not drinking beer. they went back to every president that hadn't drank. it was weird. people like roosevelt who drank martinis was a great success. what is that? >> andrea: they're trying to paint him as bizarre and strange. the pictures, do you notice the pictures that the "new york times" chooses? i remember one specifically. front page picture of michele bachmann and her husband, in church. her husband had his hand up. they were trying to paint him as religious zealot. subtlement that they do with the photos they select. >> greg: there is amazing hypocrisy than reporters talking about alcohol. you could not find a drunker bunch of people than the planet. their entire life is based on free drink and free buffet.

>> andrea: you're talking about "the five"? >> bob: yeah, except for "the five." >> greg: bob is already there. only they could say it would not impair the judgment. >> dana: maybe that's why they think they can't relate. president bush admitted he had a drinking problem and stopped drinking cold turkey and never went back to it, which was, well, he says that was the best decision he ever made. it allowed his marriage to continue and his family to grow nice and strong and he became president. >> greg: he hired you. a big mistake. >> dana: i am a monster, i'm being revealed. i drank, too. >> bob: i thought that was one of the best chapters i read. >> andrea: this is dangerou dangerous. fighting back and now are we going to talk about obama's cocaine use? >> bob: i want to reinforce

greg's. when i was at the carter white house, he took the alcohol out of the white house. i didn't drink it, because you couldn't get drunk fast enough so i would sneak vodka in the place and reporters would come to my office to drink. >> dana: why white wine? the rug? >> bob: who drinks white wine. >> greg: it's great in the summertime. >> bob: i can't take it. couldn't get drunk on it. coming up, the advisor david axelrod says the president is saving taxpayers all kind of money. i agree. is that true? we'll debate it. hey, e-mail us at "the five" at thefive@foxnews.com. don't forget. ♪ ♪

four walls and a roof is a structure. what's inside is a home. home protector plus from liberty mutual insurance, where the cost to both repair your house and replace what's inside are covered. so your life can settle right back into place. to learn more, visit libertymutual.com today.

a body at rest tends to stay at rest... while a body in motion tends to stay in motion. staying active can actually se arthritis symptoms. but if you have arthritis, staying active can be difficult. prescription celebrex can help relieve arthritis pain so your body can stay in motion. because just one 200mg celebrex a day can provide 24 hour relief for many with arthritis pain and inflammatio plus, in clinical studies, celebrex is proven to improve daily physical function so moving is easier. a celebrex is not a narcotic. when it comes to relieving your arthritis pain, you and your doctor need to balance the benefits with the risks. all prescription nsaids, like celebrex, ibuprofen, naen, and melocam have the same cardiovascar warning. they all may increase the chance of heart attack or stroke, which can lead to death. this chance increases if you have heart dease or risk factors such as high blo pressure or when nsaids are taken for long periods. nsaids, including celebrex, increase the chance of serious skin or allergic reactions or stomach anintestine problems,

such as bleeding and ulcers, which can occur without warning and may cause death. patients also taking aspirin and the elderly are at increased risk for stomach bleeding and ulcers. do not take celebrex if you'v had an asthma attack, hives, oother allergies to aspirin, nsaids or sulfonamides. get help right away if you have swelling of the face or throat, or trouble breathing. tell your doctor your medical history and find an arthritis treatment for you. visit celebrex.com and ask your doctor about celebrex. for a body in motion.

♪ ♪ >> andrea: welcome back to "the five." all right.

when you think of the u.s. government, do you think of thrifty? do you think that the government actually saves money? well, obama advisor david axelrod does. this is not the comedy channel, folks. listen to axelrod explaining that the government actually saves us money all the time. >> i think that the gsa problem is concerning yes, and the president was furious when he learned of it. we imposed new strictures relative to waste and inefficiency and fraud that saved tens of billions of dollars. we saved taxpayers money all the time. >> andrea: get your thank you notes out, eric bolling. i see you ready to write the administration thank you card for the shrimp on the treadmill, the money they wasted there, turtle tunnels, chinese alcoholic prostitute studies. those are beneficial and stimulative. they're saving us money. how can they make that arguement? >> eric: you know who had a great comment, joe lieberman on "fox news sunday." he said we can hold the president accountable but not responsible.

that makes sense. he can't know everything that is going on. light with the gsa. he can be accountable for culture and the environment. what it seems to be is a culture of waste, fraud and abuse within the whole government right now. people are willing to take chances and trying to do things to put people in jail. >> andrea: do you think it includes the secret service? >> eric: i say so, but again hesitate not to throw a grenade at the secret service. they do a fantastic job. the culture, they see it there, and over there. you know places that are run properly? this place is. there are things that get away with and don't. >> andrea: i still don't have a pen. i don't have a pen. >> bob: i heard about waste, fraud and corruption every administration since i was a kid. same thing over and over. the reason that axelrod's argument is not going to work, they have tried to get safings.

but the $1.5 trillion deficit, $1 trillion. the reality is you can talk about the deficit unless and until we get this under control. >> eric: you talk about the gsa. >> bob: people in the gsa has had all kind of trouble. not laying it on bush. in 2008, they indicted a guy and got convicted as a felon for a $40,000 bribe to construction worker and clinton administration. endless stuff on title 8 and george w. bush, the housing thing. it goes back. they're not responsible for that. >> andrea: in regard to the g.s.a. scandal, president obama said he was apoplectic about it. >> dana: is he apoplectic about anything? no drama obama. >> andrea: solyndra, not

apoplectic about that. but he is about this. bob brought up entitlement. the president hasn't put together a plan on entitlement. if he serious -- i know what bob said. had a meeting with boehner. why not put a plan out there. >> dana: there was an in-depth story by the "washington post" that debunks that and said boehner was at the table and the white house walked away. let's not debate that. social security versus medicare piece. i agree with bob. on the front page of the "wall street journal" today, the story that says that the insolvency of the social security program is actually three years sooner than even predicted last year. take the entire gdp of the united states in the next 14 months and you won't come close. dealing with just that problem. so the scale is like this. this is an important and embarrassing problem for the administration they have to deal with. the fact they have not articulated what they would do to deal with this problem going forward, especially as we watch what is happening in europe, you can see it happening before our very eyes.

there is not a plan in place. not a willingness for both parties to come together. that is a problem. >> andrea: get greg in there. they are not going to put together a plan and put forth a plan in an election year. why would they have their members take risky votes on cutting benefit or cutting social security. no one stepping up? >> greg: the other thing in terms of stepping up, we have been covering this a lot. if there is a switch in power, and the republicans do not talk about this, they're jerks. we are at a point we look at the origin of the tea party why it happened. there is a change going on in america we realize we are entitlement junkies. junkies can't see they are addicted which is why when you go to sleep they go through your pockets and deny it. now we're seeing we are addicted to entitlements. if all of a sud then goes away, the republicans stop complaining about it. or we stop complaining about it because we're obama is no longer in power, then we're hypocrites. >> bob: they have an opportunity to vote in the

house and they have majority and they won't put up their own plan. don't blame obama. >> greg: everybody is scared of the -- they're scared because it's about older people. >> andrea: gingrich came out with a plan and you vilified him for it. >> bob: the republicans didn't pick up on it, did they? >> eric: not only is there a culture of entitlement in the administration. there is something in the news that is important. $8 billion program supposed to be for experimental analysis on when obama, switch over to obama care, full-fledged what will happen. $8 billion. supposed to experiment trying to find ways to save money. what do you -- the administration is using that $8 billion to do, to tie the administration, to tie the senior citizens over, because medicare advantage is going to go in a year. they don't want it to go away now like they want it to go

away. use the $8 billion to tide them over to bridge people so the elderly can vote before the medicare advantage -- >> bob: you can remember the reagan administration with the $4,000 toilets and the $200 hammers? i don't care any administration -- >> eric: this is -- >> bob: every administration misuses money. every one of them do. >> dana: but axelrod says they don't. they care about this administration. >> bob: what he should have said we haven't come to grips with entitlele. nobody has. republicans or democrats. until we do tax reform it won't happen. >> andrea: how can he say that when the administration went and created a new giant entitlement costing us way more. >> bob: gao says it makes us there ar$1 trillion. come up with an alternative to healthcare. >> greg: conservatives don't believe that the answer is in a government program so you can't demand them to do that.

>> dana: the president sets the agenda in washington. the senate democrats run the senate. why would house republican goes through that when they know the president won't tell democrats you don't have to vote on that. >> bob: sput their mouth why he is not doing it. >> dana: he should lead. >> bob: the house does -- >> andrea: we have to go. we won't solve it now, but maybe during the break. coming um, eric holder and the department of justice accuses a florida town of discrimination because they're supposeddedly not hiring enough african-american firefighters. our own eric bolling has details. ♪ ♪ ♪

[ male announcer ] want your weeds to hit the road? hit 'em, with roundup extended control. one application kills weeds, and stops new ones for up to four months. roundup extended control.

>> eric: welcome back. yours house is on fire and you call 911 for help. life-or-death moment, what firefighter you do yaw want to show up? you want the one the union thinks is right? and right doesn't necessarily mean the right one to put out the fire. more likely the right man or woman satisfy a union mandated university goal. the unions getting involved >> bob: this city is jackso jacksonville. jacksonville had long career of keeping them out of the firefighter. and the union defaulted because they are the one giving the text results and the test questions to the

white firefighters and not to black. the test has very it will to do with fighting fires. >> eric: i had it in the script but we scrolled past it. the complaint says that -- they have to get americans past the examination date, significantly white candidates. it's just like an old argument. >> bob: if unions are giving questions to the firefighters, it's not difficult. >> eric: i'm not sure the way it reads. >> greg: the problem with the story i don't know what the charge is about the test. if they're saying, if the people sue say that the standards are too high, that is scary, because to me that is racist to expect someone to think that someone can't meet a standard. that is frightening to me. but i don't know what is going on. is there some collusion involved in the test? if that is the case, so be it. holder, holder keeps picking and choosing odd cases. last month a group of white

men claimed a group of black firefighters prevented them from attending the tutorial on the test or on the exam. holder didn't seem interested in that. >> bob: but remember, named in the lawsuit is the union that eric attacked. >> eric: here, miami, reuters. the justice department sued the city of jacksonville florida on monday claiming the use of written tests in the city fire department discriminates against african-americans. >> bob: the d.o.j. also named the local firefighters union. >> dana: but the thing that i immediately thought of was the supreme court. the supreme court ruled in favor of the firefighters in new haven, connecticut. so this is almost the same case. >> bob: that was the real test.

>> dana: the firefighters claimed they were unfairly given promotion. >> bob: but the other way around. >> dana: right. the supreme court ruled in the white's favor -- not the white's favor but ruled it was wrong. the way i read this, and i'm not a lawyer, it seems like it's the same case. >> andrea: if they are rigging a test to keep a certain race out, that is not right. what is the solution in make the test easier? listen to the debate. the same thing we talk about the navy seals looking for the minority seals. when there is a fire in you house, you don't care who shows up at the door. it doesn't matter. having a rational discussion about race, but it's very difficult in this country. it seems like holder wants to do that. he wants to polarize, even the smallest cases with firefighters. it just does not seem like a priority. it doesn't. >> greg: attorney general or

al sharpton's secretary sometimes. >> bob: take a taste in any haven, totality of the test. it was brought in. and black firefighters were given promotions when white firefighters did the test as well or better. rightfully so. the supreme court ruled the right way. in this case, it's one piece of a broader test of firefighters. that one piece is a written test that is not necessarily germane to firefighting. and the union is named because the union favored white firefighters. >> eric: can we move on to the next topic. democrats force a vote in immigration, with or without the supreme court approval. so the supreme court will hear the case tomorrow. department of justice. >> dana: i read an interesting article. q&a, speaker of the arizona house and asked do you have regrets?

that we didn't anticipate the fire storm. you remember last february, this is all anybody was talking about, arizona. sometimes you don't realize it's something you think is logical is going to become a huge fire storm. that's what happened with this case. it seedpod that the supreme court will hear. get it -- i think it's good that the supreme court will hear. let's get it out there. they will look at the law. >> eric: democrats don't -- >> i can hear it already. can you hear it in politicizing the court, politicized court. whether the supreme court upholds the law or does not. great political theater for democrats. they will say look the supreme court, the political court. the republicans support this. they will dee machinize every republican on this -- demonize every republican on this. >> bob: the most biggest, vocal new group against the arizona immigration law is the arizona businesses because they get hurt by it. they know it. it was ridiculous thing to do. they come -- >> greg: they're hurt because they're smeared.

>> bob: remember, they wouldn't do martin luther king day. >> eric: coming up, legalize pot, good idea or bad? we'll be right back. ♪ ♪ it's very important to understand how math and science kind of makes the world work. in high school, i had a physics teacher by the name of mr. davies. he made physics more than theoretical, he made it real for me. we built a guitar, we did thingwith electronics and mother boards. that's where the interest in engineering came from. so now, as an engineer, i have a career that speaks to that passion.

thank you, mr. davies. ♪ [ malannouncer ] remember when you were a kid? you liked getting dirty an building things. there were no limits -- you could move mountains. the john deere 1 series subcompact tractor -- the way grownups move mountains. and with auto-connect implements, it's the easiest tractor to use yet. what will you create? learn more about the affordable 1 series at johndeere.com/1series. [ roger ] tell me you have good insurance. yup, i've got... [ kyle with voice of dennis ] ...allstate. really? i was afraid you'd have some cut-rate policy. [ kyle ] nope, i've got... [ kyle with voice of dennis ] ...the allstate value plan. it's their most affordable car insurance -- and you still get an allstate agent. i too have...[ roger with voice of dennis ]...allstate. [ roger ] same agent and everything. [ kyle ] it's like we're connected. no we're not. yeah, we are. no...we're not. ♪ the allstate value plan. dollar for dollar, nobody protects you like allstate.

and now i build them. i am a bigger is better kind of guy. i absolutely love building locomotives. i knew i wanted to design locomotives from when i was very young. [ jahmil ] from the outside it looks like such a simple device. when you actually get down into the bare bones of it, there's so much technology that's submerg. [ rob ] my welds are a signature, i could tell my welds apart from anybody's. you lay down that nice bead and you look at it, i love it. they don't go together by themselve there are a lot of little parts, and everyone has their job. [ scott ] i'd love to see it out there on the open tracks. and when i e it, i'm gonna know that i helped build that thing.

[ train whistle blows ] here she comes! [ bell clanging ] [ train whistle blows ] wow! [ charlie ] well, it's one thing seeing them built, but then to see them out here, pulling freight across america, it makes us proud. ♪ i'm bret baier in washington. in the secret service scandal, two more resigned, one is forced out and two have been clearecleared in the colombia prostitution investigation. there are new comments from president obama about the agents who protect him and the ones implicated in this scandal. plus congressional reaction. also this evening, democratic

effort in congress to undue a possible supreme court ruling before it happens. the president is going after the youth vote pushing his idea to avoid a big jump in student loan interest rate. democrats see it as a winning issue against mitt romney. there is a problem. interesting story about your tax dollars going to pay the student loan debt of federal workers whose salaries you already are paying. in the grapevine, president obama breaks the same campaign promise for a fourth time. we'll explain. "special report" from washington starts at 6:00 eastern. now back to new york and "the five." ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> greg: they ran a contest against the students who apply the idea of spreading the wealth to their grades. if your gpa is in the top 10%

would you sign a petition to transfer some of your grades to kids with lower marks. be a patriotic egghead if it were. here is tape on how it went. >> sign it? >> yeah. >> i am not. >> your gpa would go down a little bit obviously. >> yeah. no! >> why? >> because i work hard for my grades. >> individual opportunity to get theirs. >> greg: obviously a racist. so is it greedy to withhold your grades because you worked hard for them? how is it really your grade if you took public road to get to school or subway to get to study group? is it your grade if your

professor drew a salary from fund? how is it your grades if you have oppression of pateryiar i can. so i institute the gutfeld rule that demands students with 3.8% or higher to slash it to give a portion to those deserve a fair share. i know. you studied hard. isn't it your duty to give up what you don't need? trust me. like president obama, i know better. as in the buffett rule, the gutfeld rule has to beneficial effect on the economy. ill makes me feel good about making you feel bad. this is clever. a lot of jobs don't pay taxes or have jobs an they don't understand fair share other than it sounds really good. >> andrea: like the e-mail forward that people send around. if you want to explain it to kids, explain it in the sense

of grades. great way to put it. i was a 99% when it came to that, especially in algebra. i would have taken the grades to other students. i'm a pass/fail personally. did you like that? >> greg: i was too old for pass/fail. >> andrea: you never had a pass/fail class? >> greg: never. i was passed out. but never a pass/fail. would you be for spreading the gpa around as it were? >> bob: to get my grade up it would have taken the student body to give me all of their grades. listen, the idea is to equate this with taxes and make more money. you should give more of it away. the gpa don't have anything to do with war or spending money or investment. i get the motion of what you're trying to do but it's silly. of course you couldn't give up your grade. if i gave up my grades -- >> andrea: perfect example. >> eric: of course it is. exactly perfect. >> bob: no, it's not.

>> eric: you work hard and earn money and the government wants a piece of it. if you work hard and study hard and the teacher, in this example says i wage a piece of your good grade. >> bob: but the government uses it -- >> eric: for whatever reason weren't gifted enough to get good grades. >> bob: that is the best analogy you can do. >> eric: class warfare in the classroom and obama and warren buffett do it in business. >> greg: think about it. when i was talking about it, in my brilliant monologue, by the way. you said was probably the best one you've ever heard. i mention that your grade is not your grade if you use anything public. same argument if you take the bus to class, technically the government helps you. isn't that argument genius? >> dana: you can make the arguen't about everything. >> greg: that is what i'm saying. >> dana: brilliant. not obvious one at all. imagine parents paying for the tuition. maybe there is a bonus school if you get an "a" you will get x, y, z for christmas.

and how mad would the parents be to find out that the kid gave away some of their grade point average? and i know you would haven't done this, you would not have taken the grades. the fact that we have kids today that would actually accept somebody else's grades to help their own, that, i think is -- >> andrea: i was proud, i was so proud of my c-minus or maybe d-plus in a je back. you're right. i earned that d-plus. >> dana: i promise you, you would have taken it. >> greg: you're raising your hand. you would have taken it. >> bob: i said an degree yeah. looking at the ion tact. >> greg: it doesn't have to be grades. nif talent you have. >> bob: grades should not make government grow. >> --alogy -- >> greg: grades get you the job and get blown -- >> dana: to help you graduate and then get a job. >> bob: we are not going to talk about the school that makes you not get in the aye i have league school? >> greg: want me to talk about it? >> bob: we're out of time.

>> greg: i would do it as the one more thing. >> bob: save it for tomorrow. coming up -- oh, sorry. >> andrea: you give him one "a" block. >> greg: all right. coming up, the prominent economists are now saying that legalizing pot could significantly reduce our ballooning deficit. but the economic benefit outweigh social consequences? important, do the economic benefit outweight the social consequences? that wasn't important. that was the same thing. darn you stupid jazz cigarettes. ♪ ♪ my mother made the best toffee in the world. it's delicious. so now we've turned her toffee into a business. my goal was to take an idea and make it happen.

i'm janet long and i formed my toffee company through legalzoom. i never really thought i would make money doing what i love. [ shapiro ] we created legalzoom to help people start their business and launch their dreams. go to legalzoom.com today and make your business dream a reality. at legalzoom.com, we put the law on your side.

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ >> dana: i do not get the song and i don't think we should show the video sention it's 5:00. you will disagree with me but i'll set this up.

300 economists, three noble laureates weighing in on a paper by harvard economist that said if the government legalized drugs it would save $7.7 billion. that is not the only reason. there are reasons that law enforcement is all tied up. there are people that shouldn't in prison because marijuana is not as bad as people like me think it is. but i grew up in the world of this is your brain, this is your brain on drugs. you are for legalizing drugs. freddie way to cover yourself. you owe me $80. i haven't forgotten about that. the argument that legalization will help the government, the deficit is the wrong argument. you shouldn't legalize something to get more money to what is the true addict, which is our government. you legalize it because it's right. you legalize it because it may grow the economy and get people out of jail who shouldn't be in jail. people who smoke dope are very passive. they're not violent criminals. it's ridiculous. are we becoming less safe --

>> eric: you are such a generalizer. people who smoke dope are -- >> greg: people who drink tend to be more violent than people who smoke pot. that is a fact. anybody who has been in bars as much as i have knows this. >> bob: bars are both stoned and drunk. >> greg: true. >> dana: go ahead. >> eric: i am vehemently against this. i have a 13-year-old who knows there is no leeway on this. if you get in trouble with pot or any other drug, deep trouble. >> dana: end up in the military. >> eric: he will end up there. it's a get away drug -- gatesway drug. you may disagree. >> greg: what is a gateway drug? >> eric: once you feel comfortable with it, you move to the level up more dangerous. >> greg: that is like saying apple is gateway fruit to banana. >> andrea: hamburgers, mcdonald's, gateway drug to

obesity. >> bob: wait, when they used "gateway" in the day, it was not appropriate way to put it. today, because medical marijuana is made legally. they have established marijuana and cross pollinated marijuana to make it 20, 30, 40 times more powerful than what i used to smoke. that does put you in a situation where you really are impaired. impaired a lot. the other thing is the people who use high-powered marijuana, tend to hang around with people who use cocaine and other drugs so the introduction in that world is something that is easy to slip into. the idea we'd legalize a drug as powerful as the stuff is beyond me. freddie there is one drug that does more damage than all of these drugs and it's alcohol. >> bob: i could not agree more. >> greg: that is legal. we saw what prohibition is. if you want to go that route you won't win the drug war. i have friends in the drug war and they think it's a joke. >> eric: driving while impaired, alcohol or marijuana is dangerous.

>> greg: of course, it's dangerous. there should be laws. >> eric: why would we add more people on the road impaired? >> andrea: i actually agree with you, greg. i think the congress those change the law, because even minor amount of marijuana is illegal. but it's a tradeoff. are we willing to accept a modest increase in drug use, because people who use a little bit of marijuana don't realize their lives in the decrease in crime. if the up-side greater? i would have to say a modest increase in drug use for decline in crime, i'll take it. leave it up to the state. >> bob: your point on one thing. with alcohol, it is a dangerous and expensive drug. but there is noo place else to go above it. with marijuana, the place you go above it -- >> greg: not true. >> bob: where do you go above alcohol? >> greg: drugs. >> bob: there you go. >> dana: we'll continue this in the break, because it's very good. it didn't get to one thing to point out. go to the magazine website,

article by mike rigds, the industry is feting rich off the drug war. we didn't get to that today. great article. >> greg: he owes me $50. >> dana: "one more thing" is up next. ♪ ♪

♪ [ malannouncer ] remember when you were a kid? you liked getting dirty an building things. there were no limits -- you could move mountains. the john deere 1 series subcompact tractor -- the way grownups move mountains. and with auto-connect implements, it's the easiest tractor to use yet. what will you create? learn more about the affordable 1 series at johndeere.com/1series.

♪ ♪ >> bob: time for one more thing. dave letterman pointed out last night, can we see the tape of what mr. letterman said? >> the fox news clip of the night, i think you only see it here, and we only do it when it's something extra special. the fox news clip of the nigh. take it away. ♪ ♪ >> you say it's a failure and you don't what the [bleep] you're talking about. >> whoa, whoa, whoa. bleep! what are you doing? we were on the air. when you just cursed. >> we weren't on the air. >> yes, we really were. >> you hope we were. >> no, we were. >> how long were we on the air? why are we not on the air now? >> we are on the air right now. this is live television.

>> okay, good. [ laughter ] >> bob: i'm a drug addict, and sometimes i get misspoken. i put more money. i put this in. you know why? i'll contribute all of this money. yes. >> eric: very nice. very quickly, in the business community, all eyes on apple after the close today, reported earnings, expectations, full screen. they close at $560 plus a share today. the expectation was for $10 a share earnings. it was $12.30. blowing out the number. so that was $560 at a close and now at $599. >> dana: buy, sell or hold? >> eric: that is a buy. >> dana: public service announcement for bob. yesterday, a jury ruled all of your tweets, even if you delete them, for the rest of your life can be subpoenaed at some point if they need to go back and look at them. that is what the judge decided. i know this would worry you so

i wanted to let everyone know about you. >> greg: you are such a hypocrite. it's your tweets. >> dana: i am not in trouble. this guy that was busted he had 15 days in jail for disorderly conduct after the arrest on the brooklyn bridge. they traced him. >> bob: give letterman this for his hairpiece. take this and get out of town. greg? andrea? >> andrea: last night, thank you to women's national republican club for letting me m.c. the awards dinner. ray kelly is with me. rumored to be the next mayor. this is a great night. pretty dress. thank you, everybody for letting me. >> greg: i didn't have one. that's why i said skip me. reiley has a new word a day thing. i started been a a word. today it's apoplectic. i never want to hear the word again. it's somehow gained favor in the last month. i'm tired of it. >> andrea: obama's