>>. >> neil: all right, stocks are still higher. >> i love railroads so i will take csx, very well run railroad. i love it. >> neil: what about that. >> i love railroads even before

warren buffett by i like tennessee wyoming more than that one. >> i'm for a company ultra salons, beauty salons and amazing company. the ceo left the company and got hit but amazing buying opportunity. >> neil: adam? >> i hated to doubt you, charles, but it sounds fadish to me. >> neil: what are you doing, adam? >> company called home away. they help people rent out their homes and competes with a hot silicon valley company but this one is public and doing exactly xhel well. >> neil: chance to rent out your home. >> that is business of flakes and i won't put a penny into it. >> neil: all right. >> serving up more ed? >> food inspectors could find

themselves out of work. >> what about the food that comes into our country. furloughs of air traffic controllers, food inspectors. >> food impact the people that work in the food area. >> you think we're going eating horse meat when spending cuts kick in. what is on our plate is going to be fine. but what we're about to pay for it, that is the real meat. then to the hack attack, sure we owe china our money but does that mean we owe them or backbone too and help wanted ads but hurting us all. cashin in is kicking up right now. >> i'm gerri willis. our crew, it's a pleasure to have with us former massachusetts republican senator and now fox news contributor scott brown.

welcome everybody. where is the beef? it's heading higher that is where, 10% higher and at a time when people's paychecks are shrink that go is not good news. so instead of lawmakers serving up scare tactics, should they focus on cutting shop ears break. scott, let's start with you? >> when you take the high cost of energy and high cost of unemployment insurance and everything that goes along with it, to think that the actual business owners are not going to pass that off to consumer says a mistake. then you throw in the scare tactics and it's going to lead to higher costs. they need to stop with the scare tactics and they need to get down to business. >> ground beef is up, chicken is up 12.2%. families can't take this, can they? >> and gerri, inflation is caused by government, by the artificial expansion of the

money supply to support all that spending. as you are pointing out, prices go up, value of people's savings goes down. it's devastating especially to poor folks, folks on a fixed income and both parties are guilty of this. these prices have gone up but even in the last ten years, goods that cost $1,000 and they cost $1300 today. >> think i she absolutely right. with the treasury selling an enormous amount of debt, something 70% of the beondz being sold are being bought by the federal reserve. that is the same thing as printing money. people doesn't understand that. that exactly what is happening, that is latent inflation. problem of food prices, feed grain has gone up in price so both chicken and beef are going to suffer as a result.

when a farmer's prices goes up he is going pass out the consumer and consumer is going to have to pay more. >> say that happenings. what do you say. is this critically important in rising prices. >> a simple rule every dime counts. when they are sitting at the tackle, they are looking at their checkbook everything matters. the big problem and jonathan is right. fed keys printing money. we're seeing a little bit of inflation. wait until you see what is coming down in the road. i'm worried about hyperinflation. when you are printing trillions of dollars. what do you say, marjorie? >> i go around the country and talk to moms and wal-mart moms they express concerns about making their dollar stretch. that is true when prices are going up. i think it's been stable for quite a few years. they are thinking about how much gas is going to cost and going to cheaper grocery store or what they can do without that week.

so that is real concern that a lot of americans feel and wanted to make sure that in washington we're hearing those concerns and speaking the language that we understand those concerns. >> is this going to be a major drag on the economy. i'm back to you now? >> if government allows it to be. energy is an obvious example. prices for energy have gone up. the massive inflation spike we saw in the late '70s and early '80s, that was born in the policies of carter, ford, nixon, administrations prior. we a need get tough politicians who are going to stop spending and put the government back on a sound footing. back to you on the food prices. can it trickle through to a broader economy. this kind of price increase could have ramifications for

g.d.p.? >> getting back to what was said to think politicians are going to stop spending, they are like pigs in a trough and they are going to keep spending. number two, the families of four they are getting smarter. they are going online coupon sites. they are shopping and joining clubs where they get discounts. but their margin is getting slower. bottom line if it is a real problem, as you throw in energy, high cost of healthcare, all these factors are a drain on businesses. its problem. it is a problem. wayne, what do you say broader economic problems? >> i just think they should issue more food stamps. that is what they have been doing. i would like to get in that also. no, the problem -- you can say that -- latent inflation is there and we haven't seen this

experience before. people are going to have to tighten their belts. i have to tell you something. you walk into a restaurant in los angeles or new york. they are packed. people are still spending money. i don't know where the hell they are getting it. they are spending it. i don't want to tighten my belt. i don't want to see inflation. is this going to be a big problem? >> it may be a big economic problem if we see cutting into effect that is going to cut food stamps. then i think you have a real problem. an economic advisor says it was biggest bang for your buck. if we have those cuts -- >> this is not about the sequester but this is what is going on real economy with food prices. what do you say? >> by itself, it's not going to kill the economy but academy everything else going up in price and at the same time the

payroll tax is going up. now a family makes $60,000 is paying $1200 more in taxes. >> last word to you, wayne. one more word here. >> the only word is what i said before. it's there it's just a question of facing it. you are going to see it in beef and chick eastbound prices. you are going to see it everywhere. it's a question of time and it's going to be right on us. i don't know how people deal with it. >> to counter margie, it's not caused by government not spending it is caused by government spending. free market competition, brings prices down. printing money that pushes prices up for joe six pack and billions airs, as well. >> appreciate your comments. coming up can we crackdown on china hacking if we are not hacking away at this? and plus, see see the help wanted ads, how they could cost even more jobs. with the spark miles card from capital one,

bjorn earns unlimited rewas for his small business take theseags to room 12 please. [ garth ] bjors small busiss earns double miles on every purchase every day. produce delivery. [ bjorn ] just put it on my spark card. [ garth why settle for less? ahh, oh! [ garth ] great businesses deserve limited reward

here's your wake up call. [ male announcer ] get the spark business card from capital one and earn unlimited rewards. choose double miles or 2% cash back on every purchase every day. what's in your wallet? [ crows ] now where's the snooze button? a body at rest tends to stay at rest... while a body in motion tends to stay in motion. staying active can actually ease arthritis symptoms. but if you have arthritis, staying active can be difficult. prescription celebrex can help relieve arthritis pain so your body can stay in motion. because just one 200mg celebrex a day can provide 24 hour relief for many with arthritis pain and inflammation. plus, in clinical studies, celebrex is proven to improve daily physical function so moving is easier. celebrex can be taken with or without food. and it's not a narcotic. you and your doctor should balance the benefits with the risks. all prescription nsaids, like celebrex, ibuprofen, naproxen and meloxicam have the same cardiovascular warning. they all may increase the chance of heart attack or stroke, which can lead to death.

this chance increases if you have heart disease or risk factors such as high blood pressure or when nsaids are taken for long periods. nsaids, including celebrex, increase the chance of serious skin or allergic reactions or stomach and intestine problems, such as bleeding and ulcers, which can occur without warning and may cause death. patients also taking aspirin and the elderly are at increased risk for stomach bleeding and ulcers. do not take celebrex if you've had an asthma attack, hives, or other allergies to aspirin, nsaids or sulfonamides. get help right away if you have swelling of the face or throat, or trouble breathing. tell your doctor your medical history. and find an arthritis treatment for you. visit celebrex.com and ask your doctor about celebrex. for a body in motion.

i'm arthel nevil. bitter emotions in the hurt murder case of oscar pistorius. he is accused of killing his girlfriend on valentine's day. yesterday he was granted bail and supporters erupted into cheers. family of the woman killed is lashing out saying the reaction in the courtroom was inappropriate. >> powerful winter storms, in the northeast a lingering system bringing a mix of rain and snow. new england seeing sniofls for the third straight weekend. look out for severe thunderstorms from texas to

florida. in the west, the same system causing significant snowfalls. i'm arthel nevil. we'll get you back to cashin in. for the latest headlines, foxnews.com. i'll be back in about an hour. we'll see you then. >> how without a backbone, u.s. talking about getting tough with china over dozen of cyber attacks it's accused of waging against government agencies. so far it's all talk. even though the hacking is a serious threat. does this prove the fact that we owe china so much money it's our biggest threat? jonathan, go at it. >> the deficit is a threat no matter who we owe it to. why we haven't had a backbone, we haven't had had a military threat like with iran. we should. we need an adlai stephenson

type, this is violation of intellectual property and united states are not going to stand for it when it comes to government computers. however,, this hurts china more than anyone. >> is our debt making us weak? >> i can tell you you, if we didn't have the $1.2 trillion debt that china, we borrowed china we would be in a different situation. there would be less hesitation with moving forward to say enough is enough. one of the ranking members on homeland land, this is something we discussed and find a balance between private industry and government interests. you have military interests and government interests and the private citizens and the mandarin report was damaging. the time for talking is over and we need to draw a line in the sand before it is too late. >> time for talking over? >> let me say something. i happen to have sound sources in this area.

the attacks are going to take place regardless. if you have a computer and you are communicating with somebody, you be can be hacked. it doesn't matter who it is. that is given. this the this stuff that the administration is talking about we need to do something about it and everybody has to do something about china -- that is bull. you can't stop it. it is going to happen and you better get used to it. you can't communicate. you go to communicate because computers have to communicate. there is nothing you can do about it. you can't do anything about the hacking. all this talk is ranting raving. it has nothing to do with the real problem. >> so do nothing. >> wait. i think it is important. the administration says -- but it's completely unimpressive. what are you going to write a nasty letter to the china government. >> it cost $2 billion and that was 2009 interested electric

actual property theft. this can affect all kinds of industry. who knows what they are going to go after next. again, what will you going to do? who are you going to prosecute? it's a tough road. i think you zap them and hack them back and hit them twice as hard. >> all right. are we going to zap them? >> the president is taking it very seriously. he mentioned in the state of the union. you have the attorney general talking about it and the chinese companies benefiting from hacking and he signed executive orders. it sounds like a lot. >> it doesn't mean anything. it's useless. he is pretending. of course, he takes it seriously. we all take it seriously. they are hacking us. what are you going to do? gary is right. they are not going to do anything. he is posturing and that is all there is to it.

>> it's almost like slippage of a retail store. china has been trampling all over american intellectual property rights going back to dvds and everything. ultimately it hurts china. a robber can't be rich stealing from those that produce. if they don't have respect of intellectual property they are going to wallet oh in their own misery for decades more. >> you 5/6 lot of individual companies, company like ping and private enterprises, it's a huge market obviously to start with individual responsibility notifying people of the security measures that need to be taken, putting in appropriate fire walls with new technology. it's going to start at home to be able to protect and then push back. the administration is going to do something? i'm more concerned about the military technology that the chinese and others rogue nations

are getting from us and potentially using against us and dealing with grids and natural resources and turning that around and using that against us. it's cyber war. it's something we need to take very seriously. >> you guys, i hate to be china to be up against you guys. really appreciate it. who says if you can't hit the jackpot? now you can sue. a new belt. some nylons. and what girl wouldn't need new shoes? and with all the points i've been earning, i was able to get us flight to our favorite climbing spot even on a holiday weekend. ♪ things are definitely looking up. [ male announcer ] with no blackout dates, you can use your citi thankyou points to travel whenever you want. visit citi.com/thankyoucards to apply.

employers telling unemployed don't bother applying.

now new york is the latest place pushing a law to give jobless applicants the green light to sue but gary says these laws could backfire on everybody. >> the problem is number one it's a blanket law affecting all businesses. the other problem costs are going up because all of a sudden lawsuits will be all over the place. if i'm an employer i wanted to hire who i want to hire. it's my business. part of hiring if somebody is out of work for a year, i want to know why. this is plain stupidity. >> what do you make of it? >> i think the mayor of new york is right. the mayor of new york has said the same thing that gary is saying. he made a fortune in the private business and is unpeachable in integrity. he is making one dollar a year to be mayor of new york and he says it won't work. it will end up in a lawsuits. by the way, scott was united

states senator. does that mean because he didn't get elected this time he has no confidence as being a senator? no, she hell of guy that can get elected again. why should it make difference. >> all right, scott, go ahead. >> i'm a big fan of yours, too. thank you. bottom line, i also agree with mayor bloomberg. it should be one factor and employers should have the opportunity and right to inquire what you have been doing. have you been doing looking for jobs or sitting home doing nothing. i want to hire a person that is hungry. the lawsuits, early christmas present for plaintiffs' lawyers and cost of business will go up. i feel employers will hunker down and not hire. it's not at good idea. >> do you agree, margie? >> i can appreciate the concern about small businesses. i run a small business. i don't want to face lawsuits. it would be tough to fight that. i think what a voters, carrot

rather than stick because you have folks chronically unemployed and recession. how do you get those folks back into the work force. we should be encourage and making it easier for those folks to get back to work. >> is that the way it works, jonathan? >> if it's a business owners' interests they will hire them but they have right to discriminate. its discriminate is a term for judgment and successful business you need to have judgment especially about how to wayne's point, you want to invest who you want to hire and who you wanted to fire. laws like this is an insult to an individual trying to using their brain to grow his business and hire the best person for the job. >> and with the market again. that is the biggest problem. leave everybody alone. enough for mandates and do this.

forget it. >> we already have a lot of incentives place, a bill that i signed into law hire a veteran allows for $9600 tax credited. there are plenty of incentives that the employer has right to know to determine if they will be representing their interests or somebody that has been doing nothing for the last two or three years. >> other states sai that you can't discriminate and if you do we'll come after with you a fine. does that make sense? >> no, it i didn't make any sense. it's just what you said before. you have the right. if you think this guy has been out of work for the last three years and he is the best guy for the job, hire him. if you don't, you are an idiot. >> all right. thanks guys. thanks to scott brown and margie o'meara for joining us. first voters giving lawmakers an earful over illegal immigration.

time to hold on to your wallet again. >> everybody in this audience right here, you are taking away from social security. acti. it should be under stephens. the verizon share everything plan for small business. get a shareable pool of data... got enough joshua trees? ... on up to 25 devices. so you can spend less time... yea, the golden barrels... managing wireless costs and technology and more time driving your business potential. looks like we're going to need to order more agaves... ah! oh! ow! ... and more bandages. that's powerful. sharble data plus unlimited talk and text. now save $50 on a droid razr maxx hd by motorola. more "likes." more tweets. so, beginning today, my son brock and his whole team will be our new senior social media strategists. any questions? since we make radiator valves wouldn't it be better if we just let fedex help us to expand to new markets? hmm gotta admit that's better than a few "likes." i don't have the door code. who's that?

he won a contest online to be ceo for the day. how am i supposed to run a business here without an office?! [ male announcer ] fast, reliable deliveries worldwide. fedex.