Skip to main content

tv   The O Reilly Factor  FOX News  June 11, 2013 1:00am-2:01am PDT

quote
1:00 am
factor is on. >> bill: the o'reilly factor is on. tonight: >> with respect to the internet and emails, this does not apply to u.s. citizens and it does not apply to people living in the united states. >> don't control -- troll through a billion phone that is unconstitutional and violates our privacy. >> bill: where do you stand on the issue? it is confusing. we will clarify it for you tonight. >> you are not allowed to go into that data until they have a particular warrant signed off on by a judge. >> bill: the surveillance controversy is dividing both political parties both like john mccain and newt gingrich support surveillance while rush limbaugh and glenn beck oppose it we will have extensive report on that. also tonight bernie
1:01 am
goldberg on the poultry coverage of the irs scandal by the networks and thoughts about the government spying as well. caution, you are about to enter the no spin zone, the factor begins right now. >> hi, i'm bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. data mining and you, that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. the surveillance situation very confusing but vitally important for every american. so, tonight, talking points will try to clarify what exactly is going on. and here is the headline. the u.s. government currently building a 1 million square foot complex in utah that will house phone call and email data taken from americans and foreigners alike. let me repeat: the national security agency
1:02 am
nsa building an enormous complex, 25 miles south of salt lake city to mine data. that is ultra serious. a leaker named edward snowden gave information to the far left london newspaper the guardian saying the u.s. government is taking information from tech companies in order to fight the war on terror. snowden will be arrested if he doesn't get asylum in a country that does not have an extradition treaty with the u.s.a. he should be arrested even what he did may ultimately be a good thing. you can't have americans leaking national security information, that would be an arcky. if snowden thinks his case is noble, then he should put it in front of a jury. despite the initial reporting we really don't know exactly, exactly what the government is doing. here is what president obama says. >> now with respect to the internet, and emails, this does not apply to u.s. citizens and it does not apply to people living in
1:03 am
the united states. and, again, in this instance, not only is congress fully apprised of it, but what is also true is that the fisa court has to authorize it. >> bill: well, that may be a bit misleading. yes, federal judges have authorized the data gathering. but, phone calls and emails to and from american citizens are being scrutinized. and i believe that fisa judges have no idea how it's a massive intrusion and effects all of us. however, the director of national intelligence james clammer doesn't see a problem. >> the notion that we're trolling through everyone's emails and voiristicly reading them or listening to everyone's phone calls is on its face absurd. we couldn't do it even if we wanted to. >> bill: and that's true. there is too much stuff. but what could happen and what has happened is that
1:04 am
corrupt government officials have put out private data illegally. we saw that the irs hearing last week, did we not? the pro-traditional marriage organization that testified had data leaked to its enemies allegedly by an irs official. big problem. and that leaker must be arrested and charged soon. so it is obvious that if the government is gathering communications, information from americans, that information could be illegally used. now, the phone calls it's not much of a problem because the government isn't taping the calls, it's just chronically time and place. in the name of national security that might be acceptable. but emails are a far different story. there you have actual words on paper that people have said in private and if that stuff is being stored in
1:05 am
utah, that's flat out unconstitutional. here is what senator rand paul said. >> the fourth amendment says that you have to look at and you can ask for a warrant for a specific to a pepper, place in the items. this is a general warrant. this is what we objected to and what our founding fathers partly fought the revolution over is they did not want generalized warrants where you could go from house to house with soldiers to look for things and now computer to computer to phone to phone without specifying who you are targeting. >> bill: i agree. the feds will tell you. they won't go after a specific individuals unless there is probable cause. but there can't be probable cause unless they look at the emails to find a dubious situation. does everybody get this? well, some people dissent. >> they are not allowed to go into that data until they have a particular warrant signed0 judge with some cause, a
1:06 am
foreigner of terrorism. that is totally different from the irs abuses which i think are very serious. >> but, again, mr. crystal discounts a corrupt federal officials could very well look at stored email data. who is going to stop them? by the way, texts are not in play. they are not stored by the communication companies like verizon. so this is one big mess. ideologically, absolute chaos. here is a partial list of people who support the nsa surveillance program called prism, in support nature john mccain, senator lindsey graham, senator dianne feinstein, karl rove and kirsten powers, a democrat. here is some people who oppose. glenn beck, michael moore, rush limbaugh, aryana huffington, al gore and van jones. the headline van jones and glenn beck agree on something. are you kidding me? now, some liberals are surprised that president obama is behind the
1:07 am
program. but talking points is not. the president wants a powerful federal government that runs nearly everything. his whole administration about accumulating power for the feds. so this is consistent. new rasmussen poll says 52% of americans do not trust the president or federal government on this surveillance issue. that number is going to rise when we find out exactly how much data is being assembled by the feds. now, here is what i think. the war on terror requires an aggressive federal surveillance. aim sane people know that storing phone call data is questionable but i think it's permissible under the constitution. if things aren't tapped. but seizing actual words of americans said in private, unless there is probable cause they are involved with some kind of terrorism, clearly unconstitutional. fourth amendment says, quote: now warrants shall issue but probable cause supported by oath or
1:08 am
aforemention and particularly describing the place to be searched and the person or things to be seized, unquote. you can't just seize everything and say you are doing so to try to route out terrorism. you have to have probable cause to violate the privacy of an american. look, you know me. you know i'm a very tough guy on national security. i support the patriot act. i support drone warfare. i support guantanamo bay. but this is dangerous. the irs scandal proves the federal government can and has abused its power for political reasons. simply can't have american authority spying on the folks. storing their emails. it can't happen. this prism program should be shut down immediately. if it's not, a class action suit shoulden filed and the supreme court should hear it as quickly as it can. one more thing, all this government intrusion didn't stop those boston bombers, did it? those two terrorists were all over the net. and that's the memo.
1:09 am
next on the rundown, karl rove, juan williams, mary katharineham, brit hume all going to comment on the federal spying situation. the factor will continue after these messages. [ male announcer ] at his current pace, bob will retire when he's 153, which would be fine if bob were a vampire. but he's not. ♪ he's an architect with two kids and a mortgage. luckily, he found someone who gave him a fresh perspective on his portfolio. and with some planning and effort, hopefully bob can retire at a more appropriate age. it's not rocket science. it's just common sense. from td ameritrade.
1:10 am
1:11 am
1:12 am
>> bill: continuing with lead story federal government spying on americans. karl rove who supports the prism program. where am i going wrong here, mr. rove. >> well, look, let's guide these into two parts. you are right. there is the phone record program and there is prism. phone record program is essentially to keep a database of phone calls, what number called what number on what day for how long. now, this database cannot be accessed unless there is evidence enough of a tie to terrorism, a connection to terrorism that justifies a warrant from the foreign intelligence surveillance judges. so, you are right.
1:13 am
the points you made in the talking point i agree with look, the constitution protects content of communication. it doesn't protect the fact of communication and that database is keeping simply a collect of telephone numbers for some period of time so the retrospectively if the government says we have a bad call made from a bad guy abroad into the united states, let's go check and see what kind of connections there are with that phone number. >> bill: i think most people would be convinced by that argument. >> right. now prism. >> bill: email thing, huh-uh. >> hold on a second. prism. the prism program we don't know all about it, but what we do know is following. >> bill: didn't you start it. you and president bush the younger? aren't you the architect of it. >> i wasn't read into it here is what we do know. first of all the request the from the nsa goes through fbi electronics surveillance unit whose responsibility is to ascertain that the request is regarding the communication of someone who is not a u.s. citizen. and that it meets the standard for a fisa
1:14 am
warrant. in essence, this is a way for us to look at the communications, the emails, the chats, the images, the other bad guys that flow through u.s. networks. they may be communicating between islamabad but it flows through a u.s. network. it cannot be a u.s. citizen. that's the first step. >> bill: i don't think that's what's happening. they are scooping up all of them. >> that's not right. >> bill: 1 million square foot facility in utah if that were the case. he they would have plenty of storage in washington, d.c. or maryland. >> no, no, no. think about. this think about the phone calls. let's go back to the other program much the phone records is for some period of time and i don't know how long it is. i don't know whether it's a year, two years, three years, four years. >> bill: i don't want to get bogged down. are you saying flat out there is no con i have scation of emails from verizon and google is that what you are saying.
1:15 am
>> no confiscation of u.s. citizens. look, the law specifically prohibits. >> bill: i know what the law does but you have got whistleblower saying the on sit. >> he has no shed of evidence that the emails -- that the emails and video chats and so forth of a single u.s. citizen have been row released. has not offered one thread of evidence. >> bill: collected. >> or even collected. look, the law prohibits targeting of u.s. citizens or hold on, bill, it prohibits the targeting of u.s. citizens or anyone in the u.s. you have to get a court warrant before you can go after anybody. >> bill: here is how they dance around it and that's why i'm worried about and have to have congressional hearings on it it we're not going to target anybody. we will take all the emails so they don't get erased by verizon or whatever and then if we have to sort through them we have got them. >> you are conflating. verdicts is phone records. two baskets, the phone records and primples. prisms is retrieving
1:16 am
emails. >> bill: right. chats, videos, images and so forth. >> bill: whistleblower says they are doing it? >> they are under supervision of the fisa court. >> it depends on how they are doing it. >> no, no, no, no, no. it start by the fbi saying the person youment to go after is not a u.s. citizen or somebody located in the u.s. if the communication of a bad guy, a bad guy is doing a skype from inside his islamabad and it flows through a u.s. network where most of this material goes, can you grab that skype conversation. >> bill: i don't have a problem if it is specifically targeted at individuals. say this whistleblower is right and scooping emails up so they can sort through them later because as slapper said you can't look at all this stuff. it's just too much. we will scoop it, okay? we will have it in a super
1:17 am
computer if we need it later then we the get a warrant to go for a specific thing. would you object to that? >> the phone records, no. because there is a constitutional. >> bill: we agree on the phone records on the emails. >> if it's u.s. citizens or people inside the united states they are violating the statute under which they're operating. >> bill: you would oppose that. >> i would oppose that i want to make certain we don't conflate these two. >> bill: very explicit about it. >> well, ordinary americans aren't. we need to make certain they understand this. >> if they are watching this program you know there is a difference between time and place on the phone and specific emails. but i'm telling you what. >> and on prism we need to be careful about, look we have got two committees the house intelligence committee and senate intelligence committee they have oversight. i want them to ask these tough it questions. >> so do i. >> american people. if not people need to go to jail. until then, the law is the law and my impression of the intelligence community particularly the nsa is they are very keen on making certain they meet
1:18 am
every constitutional and statutory responsibility they have. >> bill: just like the irs, huh? >> no. i have no trust in the irs. look, you remember, bill bucky used to say rather be governed by the first 10 names found in the new york phone book. >> owed a very specific explanation and we are going to demand it mr. rove good for you. >> we also ought to protect our sources and methods of intelligence as we get those answers. >> bill: all right we have a brand new bill o'reilly.com poll question perhaps the most important one we have ever had. do you support owe oppose the data mining of eby the federal government? say it's happening. would you support or oppose it? directly ahead juan williams, mary katharine ham. brit hume. all going to weigh in on the surveillance controversy. and we are coming right back.
1:19 am
1:20 am
1:21 am
1:22 am
>> in the impact segment tonight. president obama relevant understands the rah because of federal power on the spying issue could well harm him once he leaves office. i suspect that on a list of people who might be targeted, you know, so that somebody could read their emails or listen it their phone calls, i would probably be pretty high on that list so would juan williams and mary katharine ham. join us now from washington. mary katharine, start with you tonight. because i always start with juan we want' to mix it up a little bit here. karl rove believes that there isn't an abuse on this prism program. the whistle blower clearly says there. >> right. >> it is strange to me that
1:23 am
the building this enormous facility in utah. got to be building it to store something. phone calls you don't need that. that raised a red flag to me and you say? if you take whatever your poison is, irs, tsa, bin gaze, whatever the situation is and you say what is our confidence that these rules oofer even ifner place not being violated especially if the entire program is secret. i would add that the existence of a 29-year-old it guy working at a private firm not the tsa or cia not having this information regardless of what you think of the information. >> access or not. let's be clear. >> but, wait. but the document itself has been authenticated. the document that gives us the information that verizon did this. so we had access to some of the stuff. >> bill: we don't know what this guy is saying is true. is he hong kong. >> we will find out more
1:24 am
about him. >> worked for a private contractor hot nasa hired to monitor whatever they everywhere monitoring. he got wind the existence nsa phone tapping have been confirmed by other sources. >> bill: we don't know exactly what prism. >> my point being that there are 5 million top secret or secret clearances which is what we are finding out about this gigantic secret surveillance state that we have, then what are the chances that every single person is operating exactly according to the law? >> bill: none, zero. >> that's the risk you run and i think that's what you are tapping into, bill. >> bill: all right, juan, you say? >> you know, i listen to the two of you and i realize you don't trust government and i think is is extension of the conservative line that this is more government overreach and government -- look, if you don't trust used car dealers, you don't trust morticians or journalists, okay, i understand it but here you are saying not only don't you trust president obama, you don't trust the people who republican and democrat run the house intelligence
1:25 am
committee, the senate intelligence committee. you don't trust the judges on the fisa court. >> bill: okay. were you in a coma last week for the irs testimony? were new a coma last week for the irs it testimony? you have federal officials -- >> -- you know, that has nothing to do with this. nothing. >> bill: of course it does. you had federal officials working for the irs being paid by the federal government who are illegally mining information about conservative and conservative groups and giving it to their opponents. that's a crime. you are telling me i should trust the federal government. what are you, bambi? >> no. no you are telling me about a crime that has nothing to do. >> bill: of course it does. it's mining of the information. >> the heart and soul of what you are saying, a guy who has supported the use of drones. a guy who supported gitmo and all the rest as you outlined it. the heart and soul of what you are saying is i don't trust the obama administration. no it's not the obama administration. it's the federal apparatus. >> this is a real important debate, bill. you have highlighted it. so don't -- you know, down
1:26 am
play it or water it down by bringing in irs. that's. >> bill: juan, you must be sniffing glue, juan. >> oh, stop. >> bill: if you can't see how the irs abuse of mining information that's supposed to be private and giving it out illegally to other people. >> it's wrong. >> bill: come on. >> it doesn't. it doesn't tie in. >> bill: all right, mary katharine, do you think it ties in? >> yeah, i this at this ties in. one thing i would say is that the 11% approval rating of congress might suggest that many people might not trust their oversight for all of this information. >> bill: it's not oversight. it's about the government doing things without a precision. all right? >> that's the thing, bill. >> bill: some of that email is going to be abused. period. >> this is part of the problem is that it appears to be domestic, not just foreign. it appears to be widespread. >> bill: why do you say it appears to be domestic when karl rove says it isn't domestic. >> it looks like they are
1:27 am
dragnetting all this information. >> bill: where are you getting that from though. >> part of the problem this is all secret so we cannot -- karl probably can't tell us if he knows. >> bill: we don't know the whistleblower in hong kong says that's happening and rove says it isn't happening. we don't know. >> at least the phone stuff is not very targeted and is domestic. i have an issue with that a little bit beyond what you do. >> bill: no, no. >> hold 00 not just because there is distongues you can do a lot with data now than you could bill political. >> got it rope to protect us and phone thing is okay with me. go ahead, juan. >> i don't know, the two of you, i don't want to get blown up. i'm amazed that's true searches aren't on the side of the obama administration here. >> bill: oh, come on. >> i hope it's a lesson not to trust government on either side. >> you don't want them to trust anybody. you don't want a government or civilization. >> when there is owe tenel for abuse they will take it most of the time.
1:28 am
next time you go to the land of oz i want to come with you. brit hume, dennis miller awesome thoughts on the spying candle. saying they were targeted by the irs. we hope you stay tuned to
1:29 am
1:30 am
1:31 am
>> bill: hume zone segment tonight as we told you in the talking points memo he controversy pitting conservative against conservative liberal against liberal.
1:32 am
who would have ever thought that rush limbaugh and michael moore could agree on any issue but they both oppose the prism program. on the liberal side dianne feinstein likes it, arianna huffington hates it joining us from washington to sort it all out for us brit hume. so you heard a lot of stuff in the last 15 minutes or so. >> i did. >> bill: how do you process it all? >> well, what i would say about the program as far as we know is that used legally within the we're all probably pretty safe in terms of the privacy of communications. the worrisome thing is when the government has this much data is the possibility that it could be illegally accessed and used for illegal purposes. the leaker of this information suggested that can happen and that he, as a relatively junior officialor junior employee of a company that was working with the national security agency that he was able to access all this information.
1:33 am
i'm skeptical of him, however, bill. i think he hasn't been very clear and specific about the kinds of abuses he claims have happened or could happen. he hasn't cited any specifics even in terms of the way he described them. so i'm a little worried about him. in fact, bill, i would say to you that the thing that has worried me most about this program is that this guy got a security clearance. i wonder how he did it and here are not a lot of other guys. >> allen subcontractor. >> he does this. is a guy with limited education. doesn't seem like the kind of person who would qualify for a very high security clearance to be in a position as he claims he was to access the most sensitive data. he did know a lot of the details about this program. so, it's -- i think that's worrisome. >> bill: i don't know why you are surprised at that i mean we saw guys in cincinnati for the irs doing all kinds of crazy stuff. >> yeah, but. >> bill: come on. >> remember,. >> bill: i have got to ask you -- >> -- they were all saying they were doing so on orders from senior officials. >> whatever they were doing
1:34 am
it was illegal and somebody should go to jail for doing it rove says he doesn't believe they are taking emails. all right? >> i think that's probably true. whatever emails they are taking are not from people in the united states. >> bill: okay. so you believe that? >> well, look, i believe it's possible that they could illegally do something else. i'm just assuming the program is being carried out legally. that may be a big assumption but i will take it. >> bill: why do you think they are building this humongous thing in utah. >> this is what the nasa does. the nsa intercepts and analyzes communication of all kinds. cable traffic from all over the world. i mean, it is a vast undertaking. >> bill: up until now all they had was a maryland facility and it worked fine and now they are expanding it in a huge way. >> i understand it because they retain the data. look, the example mike hayden provided yesterday the former intelligence chief provided yesterday was a pretty good one. we capture a terrorist and we get his cell phone. cell phone we haven't seen
1:35 am
before with a new number. we want to know if he has had contact with people in the united states to organize a terrorist attack. we run it through this vast trove of data that we have on phone numbers to see if he contacted anybody. well, look, you are going to keep that over a number of years. these cells with build over a number of years. along as you are gathering this voluminous information the more storage you need. the utah facility doesn't bother me. the what bothers me is that it could be used illegally. >> bill: bernie goldberg on how the networks don't really want to talk about the irs scrutinizing conservatives. miller will weigh in on the spying controversy as well. those reports moments away.
1:36 am
1:37 am
>> bill: thanks for staying with us. i'm bill o'reilly in the weekdays with bernie segment. last week the house ways and means committee heard riveting testimony from the leaders of six conservative
1:38 am
groups who allege they were targeted by the irs and that scrutiny hurt both them and their organizations. the factor covered the story fairly and extensively but not everybody emulated us. abc news and cnn prime time didn't cover the hearings at all, nothing about them. cbs evening and the cbs morning news gave the hearings three minutes total. and nbc nightly news and "the today show" also gave the hearings three minutes. that's a minuscule amount of time. joining us from asheville, north carolina purveyor of
1:39 am
1:40 am
left agenda driven person. you know, and they don't cover it at all? >> this is great -- you are making a great point, bill. i would have said if you didn't -- even if you didn't say that abc is the worst shame on diane sawyer. she is an intelligent person. she used to work at cbs. i knew her there. she is an intelligent journalist. they had time the night of the testimony before congress to run a story about window washers dressing up as super heros to entertain kids in a hospital. i am not against that kind of story. but not at the expense of
1:41 am
something as important at americans testifying about the irs abuses. >> bill: i don't get it. >> i don't know if what's going on there is political or simply that they are going light, but it's shame -- abc is the worst of all of them as far as i'm concerned. >> bill: well, they know better. >> that's right. >> bill: so far, you have been listening to the factor tonight, right? >> yeah. yeah, sure. >> bill: covered this nsa thing fairly? have we been fair here? laid it out there. >> you know why you have been fair because the nuances of all sides have been covered. let me give you my take on this quickly. i care about civil liberties. i guess i should be more concerned about the u.s. government snooping on so many americans, but i'm going to be honest with you, bill, i'm not. i'm not concerned, not right now anyway. when i hears a i have heard on tv people saying we live in a police state, you and i have covered stories in police states. this is not a police state.
1:42 am
this -- going after terrorists is not the same as going after litter bugs. so, we have to weigh privacy vs. security. and when president obama says this is about trust, is he absolutely right. but that's precisely the problem. and you have touched on this during the program. trust is precisely the problem. when you have the irs going after americans because of their political beliefs. when you have high ranking government officials misleading americans about benghazi, when you have eric holder under oath absolute at least misleading congress about when he went after james rosen, when i have more confidence in the veracity of the world wrestling federation than i do in this federal government, then americans have a right to wonder, despite what they are doing today, where it may all lead. that's the problem. >> bill: there is a bigger problem though. when you see a guy like
1:43 am
rosen, all right, targeted in very, very specific way by the attorney general who put his name on a document that said, you know what? james rosen may be a coconspirator and a security leak and is a flight risk. >> right. >> bill: this is the attorney general putting his name on this kind of a ridiculous document, all right? and now we have allegations that emails from private citizens are being accumulated and are going to be dumped in utah so some 29-year-old kid can sort through it and send whatever he wants to aunt mable. that's pretty frightening. >> here are the two sides to that on the one hand i'm not worried about that today. i'm not. maybe i should be but i'm not. on the other hand, when you have, as you correctly say, the attorney general doing what he is doing and all the other mischief and half truths that are going around, yeah, i don't think somebody is paranoid because they say if this government can go after americans for their
1:44 am
political beliefs and the part of the government is the internal revenue service, yeah, they have a right to be concerned about what might happen. >> bill: and the attorney general. so we have have to know what they are doing. that's what we have -- the congress has got to get them in there and they have got to specifically say what he is doing. >> i'm not worried today but i understand why people may be worried about what's going to happen tomorrow. >> bill: thank you. bernie is on deck. spying muslims objecting to bikinis and miller's trip to london. all when we come back.
1:45 am
test
1:46 am
1:47 am
>> bill: back of the book segment tonight, miller time. the sage of southern california is a very busy schedule this week so we are coming to him early on monday. he joins us now from santa
1:48 am
barbara. now, if anyone is going to read your emails, miller, they are going to get a massive headache, you know that correct? >> yeah. yeah. billy, this -- i didn't think much of it at first, but now code name falcon and the snowden is heating up, my friend. but, listen, i am enough of a patriot to sit here every week and tell president obama that i think he really stinks at the job on national television. i don't go behind the scenes and chitchat on phones or send emails. i'm right here, mr. president. i respect you enough to tell you i think you are really crappy at this. on the biggest rated cable show in america. i can't do anything about tapping rated cable show in america. and i can't do anything about tapping anyway. i don't even use the pledge of allegiance. i sauce the a.a. serenity prayer. i can't keep them from tapping
1:49 am
my phone. go ahead, boys. just tap it. >> see, i can change it, though. if they are proven to be tapping anybody's calls. and there is no allegation about phone tapping. but the e-mail stuff they are. >> the jokes. i was trying for jokes. >> i know. >> when the president comes into the press room they don't play hail to the chief, they play the police song, every breath you take. >> that's the watching you song, right? >> they didn't really. but jokes, comedians. >> and segue over to something you are really going to like. no bikinis is miss world in bali, indonesia. >> they are the most
1:50 am
closed-minded people in the world, muslims, making the call on an open-minded world. if you don't go along with it you're deemed to be close minded houfplt in the hell did that happen? they won't be happy until they do it with "the hurt locker". and miss congeniality is out too. >> can i make two points? miss congeniality has been replaced by miss jihad. >> there you go. >> number two, have you been to bali? have you been there? >> that is on my list every year. that and -- hell! >> there are many bikinis are there. the beach. frankie avilan would love it. >> that's what i mean. at this point i don't know why anyone would want to represent a
1:51 am
thing called the world. it's gone so crazy. >> the miss world pageant. >> i saw a chick's ankle the other day and i had to make take eye out with a sporbg. >> you went to london. how were you received? >> i have an idea. maybe throw me a little taste if you run with it. you and doogie do killing henry viii's wives. i'm not looking for a big participation. >> how about a little thank you in a credit at the end of the book. >> what i was doing over there, i was giving a speech to businessmen out in the shire.
1:52 am
druids were laughing at me. using the irs against me. that translates to taxation without representation is tyranny. i might have to plot my return to the mother land at some point. so i was casing the joint. >> a little reverse. i got it. now, do they know you over there, miller? we get mail from london. >> i used to be on saturday night live. >> that was 35 years ago. you and chico marx. it's been a while back. >> a few people know me. obviously they don't know me as much as they do here. >> well, miller, we're everywhere. >> let's go over in and do a show, baby. >> i am actually thinking about
1:53 am
it. >> over there, billy, you would drive them crazy on the other side. >> we will have jerry and the pacemakers open. brand-new factor stuff. the tip up next.
1:54 am
1:55 am
the dvd and blu-ray of killing lincoln out tomorrow. new movie. kids are going to like it. it's an educational tool as well. it's a great educational tool. fabulous book. the children will understand. please it out. they will like them. david field's greenville, tennessee. having trouble comprehending
1:56 am
this wicked people will use any federal data to harm their enemies. some will say the government is not doing enough to protect us. >> you are right. the potential for blackmail is enormous. government spying will effect everybody. you are nothing but a bully. megan kelly was just trying to explain the surveillance situation and you criticized her. dianne feinstein. i gave everybody a little jazz. i know you're protective of miss megyn. she appreciates it. now i know what verizon share everything plan really is. bali, indonesia. just talking about it, bill. i don't understand how you can
1:57 am
attack julian assange. >> he directly put american military people in danger. he is a true villain. rosen reported about north korea that had no implication on anyone's safety. huge difference. robin walt, italy. bill, you said susan rice didn't lie about benghazi. yet you have no proof of that. precisely the point, robert. in the usa you are innocent until proven guilty. there's no evidence ambassador rice lied. she told what she was told to do. keep it pithy in one day. wish i could write so splendidly. >> they all make great father's day gifts. couple them with the hot usa strong gear. and dad will be very happy if you do that.
1:58 am
thanks for giving tommy robinson time to explain his anti-muslim position. we do have a problem over here. anywhere in the world. o'reilly @foxnews.com. no calumny. and if you find any there is going to be trouble. there's for watching us tonight. i'm bill o'reilly. the spin stops >> it's now time for your
1:59 am
5@5:00. it sounds something straight out of a horror movie. a 44-year-old woman accused of stabbing her boyfriend to death with her heel stiletto heal heels. she said she was being attacked. when cops arrived they found 59-year-old university of houston froefr stefan anderson dead. she is being held on bond. >> women will be able to buy the over t the plan b over the counter. they wanted to certify it for nonprescription use. the plan was introduced in 2011 but was overruled kathleen seb
2:00 am
beal why yous. until recently the bill was only available without a prescription to women 17 and older. chad johnson got 30-days behind bars for this slap on his mail attorney's behind. he was pleading guilty to a probation violation a plea deal would have spirited jail time but the judge rejected it after that slap. stefan smith says that johnson has no one to blame but himself. >> you are in jail you are incourse rated you are a prisoner. you are a number physical because why? you didn't know to take a court case on domestic violence seriously enough in front of a female judge. if that is isn't the height of idiocy i don't know what is. >> johnson was on probation after pleading no contest to head butting his then

172 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on