ah. >> bill: the o'reilly factor is on. tonight: >> you can't have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy. >> bill: lawsuit latest polling shows president obama losing credibility among the public. does he have a strategy to turn things around among all controversies. charles krauthammer on that. >> pat buchanan and of course o'reilly. these guys are hard right whipping guys. they look a lot alike. black eye look to them. >> bill: sounds vaguely racist, doesn't it as the far left becomes obama idolatry falling apart lashing out. we have analysis. >> ewe have rough days for the first time i have found someone i'm able to communicate with.

>> now the internet is taking over romance. a third of romance is inside the cyberspace. is that good or bad thing. >> i'm going to be 40. >> in eight years. >> caution, you are about to enter the no spin zone. the factor begins right now. >> bill: hi, i'm bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. can president obama get a handle on all the controversies? that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. according to the latest polling, the president's job approval rating is falling faster than eric holder's credibility. the latest fox news poll has the president's job approval at 44%. 50% disapproving. that's a 3 point drop since the beginning of the year and the trend is down. the reason, mr. obama not been aggressive in defining benghazi, the irs, snooping on reporters and now snooping on americans. in fact, his comments have

been tepid. >> i think it's important to recognize that you can't have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience. >> it should not matter what political stripe you are from, the fact of the matter is that the irs has to operate with absolute integrity. >> the whole issue of this -- of talking points frankly throughout this process has been a side show. >> journalists should not be at legal risk for doing their jobs. our focus must be on those who break the law. >> bill: okay, final. but the president has put forth no specific strategies to stop the bleeding in his administration. for example, attorney general holder is a lightning rod but he is he still there. there have been no firings at the irs. there have been no further

definition on who screwed up in libya. so, what the president seems to be counting on is that the american public will get tired of all the controversies. it's summertime. the living is easy. we are going on vacation. so is mr. obama. throughout his life, barack obama has been patient when things go against him he goes to ground. he not a confrontational manor is he a problem solver. we're living in an age where high tech did i investigators our attention. the president knows that he knows that millions of americans are disengaged, lost in a world of their own making. staring at machines for hours. no longer are fire side chats are necessary. press conferences are simply an opportunity for mr. obama to give mini speeches and his trips around the country are primarily to raise money. this is the new america where politicians can hide from unpleasant things. american public gets bored easily. will they still carry about

libya, the irs and evening domestic spying in august? the president is banking on a no answer to it that question. by the way you may have noticed that mr. obama rarely gives interviews anymore. when he does they are carefully orchestrated. what we have now is executive branch largely unaccountable. mr. obama knows he doesn't have to run again, he also knows he can keep quiet and very possibly ride all this stuff out. and that's the memo. now for the top story tonight. reaction. joining us from washington. fox political analyst charles krauthammer. and you say? >> well, you have stumbled upon no you have staggered upon the truth, bill. and i think the moment ought to be marked on our calendars. >> bill: in trying. >> engraved enactually in stone. it's absolutely right. there are two things happening here. number one, it's a strategy of all presidents. when there is trouble out there, you insulate him, you hide him, you put him

away, you make sure that all the focus is on people beneath him. you know, even in the cabinet or even lower than that. that's the age old protection strategy. that's what they are doing. nothing new here. what i think is new is obama's leadership style which in effect doesn't exist. the man is a bystander to his own presidency. look at his reaction to the irs. irs i am outtridged learn about the irs scandal. doj snooping on a.p. and our own james rosen he says i'm deeply disturbed by this intrusion on to the press. 9/11 benghazi, he expresses his deep regret and then he says i have to find out what happened. is he the commander and chief. he is the president. he acts as if he has just stumbled upon the scene of an accident and he is catching up. and he has done that throughout his presidency. the lack of leadership in this administration from the top, from the president i think is quite "newsweek." even in the one place where

he acted, in libya, he had to be dragged into it he comes in late and leaves the scene to such an extent that it delegates sends into chaos and we now how it ends up with four americans slain. this is the strategy of leading from behind simply a kind way of say nothing leadership at all. >> bill: some conservatives don't believe that they don't believe introorm bystander at all. they believe he is the puppet master. that he orchestrates all of these things through a strategy of deniability through his inner circle and they're using the government to do things that benefit him and the democratic party. i mean, i get mail and i'm sure do you about this stuff all the time. so, it's a con spur toler point of view. you are just rejecting that 100%. you say he doesn't know. so then why is a smart man like that ahead of the harvard law review, why would he be disengaged? why wouldn't he be paying

attention? why would he be so uninformed? >> if you are him and you are as ideological as he is, and he surely is. when he came into office, he said in his first state of the union address i'm not here to tinker. i'm not here to reform. i'm not a clinton. i'm going to change america. he went ahead and said he was going to do it it. healthcare, education and energy. he changed healthcare. he did not succeed with energy. he did not get cap and trade. and then within a year and a half he loses the house. he knows that having lost the house, the rest of his agenda will never advance. and that's why he sort of stuck. is he enjoying the presidency. he golfs a lot, he uses that airplane a lot. is he going to have a lovely few weeks i think where is it cape cod? but, to actually be active in anything, he is always leading from behind. even often immigration he said he would do it in the first term, he didn't do anything about it he was pushed into it by the party. and he will have to do something. gun control, he didn't want to do gun control and then

it exploded on him with newtown and then he failed. i mean, this is not -- if you are looking at presidents go back to lbj they were interested, they were engaged and they got stuff done. some of them didn't succeed. this man plays the bystander president. >> bill: all right, now, if that's true, if he is truly disengaged from the process, and things are going south and people are running wild because they know that, you know, there is no laser on them, that's certainly is going to almost destroy his last three and a half years in office. number one, if the scandal business continues, the republicans will make gains in 2014, they have to. you can see the polls now, you know, receding on his behalf. on almost everything. people don't trust the government. they don't think we are headed in the rice direction. the everything. so he has to know that his presidency, his legacy is in trouble. does he not? >> he does, in the absence

of having him on my couch to analyze why is he doing this, i would give him this advice as a political observer. the thing do you with the nsa issue is to go on television and give a speech: what you should do is compose your argument. there are strong arguments in support of the program there are arguments against it. surely programs in support. very honorable people who are involved in it who carry it out. who think it's a good idea. begun under the previous administration. not a cock i'd idea that happened out of nowhere. give the case. of the president has done nothing. look look what he does in afghanistan. he triples the number of troops in afghanistan then he says not a word about it for two years. of course the public will turn against the war where all they hear about are the casualties and nothing about the war. fdr, everybody up to george w. if you are in a war, you are the president, you are the commander and chief and

americans are dying. you should explaining it and supporting it. that's not what he does. he may start something and then he disappears. >> bill: all right, charles, thanks very much. next on the rundown, the nsa leaker he is not telling china the u.s.a. is hacking them. what should we do about this guy? later, chris matthews attacks me, your humble correspondent. there is an interesting reason behind matthews' foolishness. we will tell what you it is upcoming.

>> bill: impact segment tonight. the guy who leaked the nsa story edward snowden apparently still in hong kong saying he will fight extradition to the u.s.a. if he is charged with crimes. today, fbi director robert mueller testified in front of the house committee about snowden. >> as the individual who has admitted making these

disclosures, he is the subject of an ongoing criminal investigation. these disclosures have caused significant harm it to our nation and to our safety. >> bill: according to a reuters poll 23% of americans think snowden is a trader traitor. 31% think he is he a patriot. the rest don't know. and on ideological grounds, opinion, all over the place. >> we have been calling out and crying out for heros, america is still trying to debate whether the guy that released the information of the nsa is a hero or a villain. i stand clear. i think what he did was heroic. >> i think is he courageous for sure. as a journalist, you want to see these kind of secrets exposed. >> bill: now that guy is as far left as it gets and of course beck fairly conservative because libertarian mostly. joining us from new york mark zad who has represented federal whistle

blowers in the past. is snowden a hero or a villain in your opinion, counselor? >> at this time neither. he is a criminal. we'll sees a time goes by, bill, whether or not once the program is looked at and evaluated and it's determined if it is in fact legal whether is he a hero or a individual alan. he is not -- villain. is he not helping himself by revealing to the chinese and the world that the united states was involved in affirmative cyber operations against the chinese that puts him in the ville alan category. right now he is an admitted leaker of authorization right now is he a criminal. >> bill: have you convicted him on the factor that is he a criminal and certainly the evidence is that he will be charged with a crime. i don't think there is any question about that. >> sure. >> bill: that's interesting that you say that because you, yourself, have represented defended whistle blowers in the past who did what snowden says is he doing, noble things to try time prove the country.

what's the difference between your clients and snowden? >> sure. i have for 20 years been representing national security whistle blowers and those who are working covertly inside the intelligence community, the cia, diansa you name it. we follow the law. there are mechanisms and messages for which these individuals which when they have concerns of wrongdoing or misconduct of the u.s. government that they can take. there is numerous steps that they can take. i take my clients through each of those steps. leaking to the media is the last resort. >> bill: all right. so you, when somebody comes to you and says, look, i don't like what my agency is doing, i think they are violating the constitution, whatever, you say to them all right, we'll do it through the system. now, some viewers are saying, the whole government is corrupt. the whole obama administration is corrupt. you are not going to get anywhere. they are going to tamp you down and fire you and harass you and do x, y, and z. can you reassure the people

watching tonight that that's not true? >> no. i have had that happen numerous times. i have also had. there are many clients i have had you have never heard of because we work things out internally to the client's satisfaction. >> bill: what happens if they can't get anywhere after following your advice to go through the system? >> well, i will give you one example. tomorrow, i'm filing a lawsuit against the central intelligence agency for a covert paramilitary officer, the cia who was accused of war crimes and was investigated by the department of justice. this is brand new news. no one has known about these investigations publicly. i worked it out so the lawsuit we're filing is unclassified, i have access through the cia to classified information. this lawsuit was vetted through the cia to make sure it's classified "i'm sorry, it's unclassified. we're filing it it's noon news. >> bill: cia for. >> to complete its internal investigation into the allegations of war crimes. the justice department. >> bill: so you want the cia to clear your guy a

former cia employee ohio assume -- >> -- current. >> bill: who i assume is charged with torturing somebody because that's what these things are usually about, right? >> and this was a mechanism that we used to bring to light what the allegations are. and we could have done that, if mr. snowden had come to me. >> bill: you can't try the case on tv. >> sure. >> bill: you are comfortable that your guy, current cia he, by this lawsuit is going to get justice, you are comfortable the system will work. >> no, i would never say that i have been doing this too long to be comfortable that the system would work. there is system in place one has to follow before one decides to be a law breaker. more importantly, that an individual does not make a determination for you, for me as to what's in the best national security interest of the united states. >> bill: i agree with that 100%. snowden should be charged with crimes. he should come back. civil disobedience, okay. if you are a noble guy, but the it in front of the

jury, hire you to defend them. whatever it takes. let's see what it is. i think this snowden is a left wing guy as you said he is now telling the chinese the u.s. government is hacking him or whatever and that's not never a good sign. >> totally different situation from revealing. >> that's right. >> alleged abuses of the nsa. >> we will be fair on this coverage. counselor, thanks very much. directly ahead. chris matthews calling me a fascist or something. why is he doing that? we'll tell you after these messages.

>> bill: pemple story segment tonight. chris matz to you thats frames things in a political rather than a personal way recently that

matthews ted cruz. >> this guy pretty far. cog blin and maybe lesser extent pat buchanan and o'reilly. these guys are hard right wing guys they have the black eye look to them. >> in addition to being misguided intellectually mr. matthews needs glasses badly. why is he spouting this nonsense. one could be ratings. msnbc and prime time down 20% each year and falling fast. joining us from washington tim graham from the media research center and macon, georgia, red state.com blowing. both are cerves. i think it's a desperate attempt by matthews to get attention. it's working because we are talking about it it's interesting because i don't think most viewers know how desperate the ratings are both on radio and television for liberals. what you have seen? >> bill, you know, it's

very much like people remember in the iraq war, baghdad bob as the americans were closing in, got more and more shill and desperate. this is what is happening to liberal talk radio and msnbc. as the ratings go down, as people are becoming more a and more disenchanted with liberalism it doesn't relate to people who live within 100 miles of a river valley. people are tuning out and becoming shill trying to keep the core audience. >> bill: when you analyze which is what your agency does, mr. graham. there isn't a liberal talk radio presence now on a national basis. there is nobody in new york. nobody in los angeles on a national basis that's done, right in liberal talk radio, air america, finished. such a great hope in 2004 that they were going to take down president bush with this massive presence in talk radio. even at a time when msnbc was doing well in the second term of bush air

america and host never took off at all. part of the reason is they just don't have any substance to offer if you listen to these shows they are just terrible shows. >> make any sense. >> usually personal attacks. right wing talk radio people entertaining they do some of the add homonym stuff, too. as far as msnbc is concerned. they did okay last year but not really. they were never competitive with fox news and cnn's decline, you know, kind of helped them a little bit. but now mr. erickson in the last six months it's all fallen apart for msnbc. they are desperate situation right now, are they not? >> radio show in atlanta. got to be entertaining. frankly, i don't know that there is a lot of entertainment on msnbc or talk shows there is a loft anger the still even though they have won and been successful politically.

there slooft anger. more than that, they don't really relate. i think factually so they don't relate to people in the heartland. they relate to and talk to an audience that is largely urban, centered along the coast, san francisco, new york, washington. >> bill: on television you can do okay on cable news with a narrow cast. >> not when it's narrow and angry. >> here is what happened though. obama idolatry which nbc embraced and campaign headquarters for the president, that's vanishing now. because of all of the problems that are one after the other after the other. and you know what? they lead with weather. some of those stations now. they are covering anything other than that because they don't know what to say. so the core liberal audience, all right, and this happened after romney lost some core conservatives just tuned out. they didn't want to listen to anything anymore they were sod that. that's what's happening with the core liberal audience. mr. graham, because they -- they are disenchanted with president obama because of the spying and the irs and all of the other business.

they don't want to hear it so they are gone. and now, matthews has got to call me names and other people names. he has got to go on the attack because he has got nothing else. mr. graham? >> chris is just unglued these days. and it's sad because, you know, this is -- this network now has nothing to do but try to play defense. and some of these shows aren't even doing that. so you see these shows focusing on topics like pot brownies in colorado and wal-mart shareholder meetings. look, tom cruise showed up, you know, just like what are you doing? you know, they are not even willing to stand up for obama because they just have nothing defensible to say. >> bill: i know you watch and mr. erickson just for your -- on cnn, which is not -- i don't consider them -- i consider them left wing but they are not crazy ideological. but they are going turkey, they are going syria. these are the stories -- anything to avoid covering what's going on in washington. and the folks are just tuning out in droves. they never had droves over

there but they were doing better because of the breaking news stories and cnn can cover breaking news. but, anyway, i mean, i get a kick out of this because matthews thinks i'm a far right facious. but the far right guys on the radio are taking me apart every day. i'm confused i don't know where i am, gentlemen. we appreciate you helping us out tonight. plenty more as the factor moves along this evening. ms. ingraham angry about the morning after pill and president obama's reversal on it she will be here. millions of measures getting married with the help of the internet. is that a good thing? we hope you stay tuned to those r

>> bill: in the are a we crazy settingment tonight chicago 35% of american couples who eventually marry met online. wow. the question is, is that a good thing? with us now attorney and psychologist dr. bonnie forest and psychologist dr. wendy walsh, the author of the book "the 30 day love detox." all right. good or bad, dr. walsh. >> i think it's a lot better than choosing your mate through the distortion of a martini in a single's bar based on their legs. really that was the tradition, right? online dating. >> bill: let me stop you right there why couldn't you be distorted with a martini on the internet. >> you certainly could. >> bill: thrown out the window. >> based on personality survey. >> bill: we have a machine basically bringing two people together and you

think that's a good thing? >> i think it's better than what we had. however, this doesn't guarantee a happier marriage or a longer marriage because we have this allusion in our culture right now that the key to successful marriage is choosing the perfect partner when actually it's about being the perfect partner. having good relationship skills. so many kids today kids, young adults, children of divorce and the way they learn to resolve conflict is to leave. >> bill: why is the internet better than what you had? why? >> because in these personality studies, you can actually find out people's values right away before you even click on them and say hello or buy them a drink. you know what their values are and have religion you know if they smoke or drink. >> bill: that's kind of clinical though. >> no, no, no. >> i say no way. i say it's no better than a bar, bill. i think the issue is that you get these online dating sites and they give you the allusion that they are thinking about the scientifically. they look at things like is the person agreeable?

is the person optimistic? those aren't necessarily things that contribute to a long term relationship. >> bill: how would the internet site even know that? everybody lies on these things, don't they? >> exactly right. >> bill: not going to say look i'm a sociopath and i enjoy killing animals. i mean, maybe some web sites you would but not on these. >> i think that's right. one of the other things, look, is it a great way to meet 1200 people at one shot. not meet that many people in the bar. >> bill: cheaper too. you don't have to buy crinks. you can have them but not buy them. >> maybe that's a bad thing. >> bill: you are mixed and cautious about it? >> very. >> bill: dr. walsh, you are more bullish on the internet meeting site. >> exactly. and this study, bill, was funded by ehe harmony.com they do very deep permanent studies. it takes them like 40 minutes to sign up. >> bill: 40 minutes? wow. that will get to the root of the narcissism.

i'm cynical about all of this i believe that life should be lived in a very personal face-to-face manner. i don't like the machines. i would never do. this however, i'm not going to criticize people who do, dr. forest. i'm not. because if it works for them, if they can rise into a comfort level, on the internet, and then meet someone in person, and it makes it a little bit easier because people are shy and some of them are insecure. and if this can help them, then i think it's a positive. it is just on the individual, correct? >> i think you are absolutely right there. i bet wendy would agree with us. if it slows things down, bill. if it gives you a chance to get to know somebody. >> bill: chat with them, right. >> their values more. understand what's important to them. some of those things are important. bill you can be more relaxed. you don't have to worry about shoes unless you are doing skype and then you have to do all this other business. >> well, there is a danger though. >> bill: when the next study is done five years or 10 years from now about all

the people who got married on the internet. i think you are going to see the same kind of divorce rate and same kind of problems that you saw. >> i agree. >> bill: that you saw in the traditional way of meeting people. up until after world war ii. a lot of marriages were arnold, were arranged marriages in the u.s.a. it's like you are going to marry this one because of the families. that happened all over the place. >> i think you are right. >> they have a lower divorce rate. >> well, but, wendy, this doesn't choose on the things that actually predict. we know what predicts a good relationship long term. how you handle conflict, for example. they aren't rating people on that. now, when you get that study and you start looking at those factors, then i think we can start putting -- >> bill: i think what the position is raw good person and marrying another good person? you can be easily fooled in that situation. all right, ladies, as always. thank you. as always, when we come right back, ms. laura ingraham a bit upset this evening about the morning after pill and president obama's reversal on it. lauer is next.

>> bill: thanks for staying with us, i'm bill o'reilly. in the week in review from the ingraham angle. this morning the morning after pill i should say. the federal judge has ruled there should be no age restriction in buying a pill that will prevent any pregnancy after sex takes place. the obama administration was going to challenge that ruling but has now decided not to. by the way you can buy the morning after pill without a prescription. that means anybody at any age can get all the pills they want. joining us from houston is miss laura ingraham. why is this bad in your opinion? >> well, a couple of things, bill. first of all, young girls as young as 9, 10, and 11, i think in about 10% of the cases medical research shows girls of that age have reproductive capacity. the studies on this drug, regardless of whether you like the drug or not, the studies are nonexistent for girls of that age. pediatric association has raised that issue saying,

look, regardless of the underlying issue whether you like it or not, we need longitudinal studies. long-term studies on perhaps the effect on young girl's future fertility and hormonal reproductive development. if this pill is taken not just once but as a matter of course as a lot of people are concerned could happen, especially if this, as it is happening. get a pack of bubble gum or batteries. we are talking about young women in most states statutory rape laws are in effect. young women shouldn't be having sex, little girls shouldn't be having sex, 76% of the time that the girls report sexual activity at such a young age, it's coerced sexual activity. so my concern there is, you know, look, that helps people who want to manipulate and take advantage of young women. we don't know the long-term health effects on the young girls. >> bill: all right, now, the argument from the

people who believe this is a worthy thing is that it will cut down on abortions. and i know you are pro-life person. >> yes. >> bill: so what do you say to that? >> yeah, the studies actually don't bear that out either. and there is a lotted that has been written by this lately. a piece in commentary magazine that i urge all the factor viewers to read. it went through all these claims that oh, this is good. this actually protects young women. this is a real step forward for women's reproductive health. again, we are not talking about 17 to 18-year-olds. we are talking about little girls who can't get. >> bill: anybody can access this. >> can't get their ears pierced or anyone who abuses a young woman could take her into a pharmacy and get it for her and membership her once again without parents knowing anything. without parents being involved, bill. at any level. >> bill: now, the judge, i'm not quite sure why he ruled the way he did. it would seem to me that probably 15, 14 maybe would

be an age that we could at least have a conversation about. this will lead to the rise in std's which is an epidemic not reported on much by the media. >> right, huge. >> bill: certainly will do that if i have unprotected sex i can get this little pill and pop it in and i will be okay. i won't have the condom or won't protect myself and bang you are going to have another explosion as we already have in that area. that's something. statutory rape obviously, you know, another thing that very under reported in this country, we don't want to hear about it, incest. same thing. >> yep. horrible. >> bill: it seems to me that president obama had legitimate reasons for opposing the judge's ruling, which he did. >> he said we needed more studies. and kathleen sebelius, bill, last year said we needed more studies. we haven't had any more studies. >> bill: they spin and give it up and they say oh, you know, it's not worth

pursuing it. i'm wondering why. you are not going to get the president to answer that question. sebelius. >> of course. this is a fanatical add heerns to this mantra that it's our bodies, ourselves. but, again, we are not talking about adults. we are talking about protecting vulnerable little girls who are vulnerable to oftentimes adult males who take advantage of them. >> bill: prey on them. >> not knowing. >> bill: just to be clear, i only have 45 seconds left, just to be clear you oppose no age limit if it were 15 or something like that, would you say all right, i can live with that? >> again, i don't think the studies are there for the 15. there are a few more studies, but, again, they are not about long-term effects. and use of the pill this morning after pill on successive occasions. those studies are not complete and not there. there are not objective studies, there is a lot of concerns. my objection to this is

obviously a pro-life objection. this is also a policy objection to protecting the most vulnerable in our society which are our children. they should not be sexualized. --should make it easier shouldn't make it easier for predators to be taken advantage of without any parental involvement or other layer of protection. i think it's a really sad day for this country and little girls especially. >> bill: miss laura, thank you. up next, american fathers, have they turned into wimps? that report moments away.

test ♪ ♪

so you can make easy, no-fee reloads with cash and checks... and know you're not on your own. so you can get the reloadable card that keeps up with you. chase liquid. so you can.

>> bill: back ever the book segment tonight, as i hope you know sunday is father's day. my newspaper column this week is about american dads you can read it on bill

o'reilly.com and more than 300 newspapers across the country. one guy who knows a lot about fatherhood who has five children and new book out called "dad is fat." i spoke with him a few days ago. so you have got five kids in 10 years. >> five kids, there might be more. i haven't talked to my wife in an hour. >> that's -- after the third kid people stop congratulating you. they treat you like you are amish. >> what's the hard thing about being a dad for you. >> some things about being a dad i wasn't prepared for. dads are the vice president of the executive branch of the family which surprised me. you know, the mom is the president. the mom is mom is the presiden. the mom is bill clinton, feeling their pain and we're al gore, the nerd telling them to turn off the lights. >> my wife has instituted this open door policy where if one of our kids have a nightmare, they are welcome to come in our room and pee in our bed. my dad, i thought he was the dictator, out there doing yard

work. i thought we were slaves. but he was really second in command. >> not my father. my father, commander of the ship. ralph crandall put it, he was the king of the castle. things have changed now, that's for sure. >> things have definitely changed. my dad essentially brought home the bacon and by that, he didn't even shop for the bacon or bring it him or cook it. he just ate it. it's not my father and his generation didn't do anything, it's that they didn't feel guilty. >> not only am i bringing home the bacon, the flank steak, the filet mignon and occasionally a lobster tail in the mix. >> that sounds amazing. you have like eight books out. >> my books, i'm like with your kids. >> my book, you know, "dad is fat," the title came from my now 7-year-old son, jack, when he was 5. the first sentence he wrote was

dad is fat. and he wrote it to me, and then i put him up for adaptationadop. as well you should. my son's little league team. we lost because they were hot. you know, they couldn't play it's hot. >> right. >> where is the air conditioning on the field? so it's a softer generation and their expectations of dad are not the same that they were. why do so many parent these days put a kid on a pedestal and almost adoring of the child, where, again, post world war ii, '50s, '60s, you know, those children were there to do certain tasks and shut up. >> right. >> now they are like little idols and i don't really know what happened there? >> every generation we try and figure it out. but we sit there, go all right, the baby should sleep on the stomach, no, the baby should sleep on its back. trying to figure it out, and

that's why i have five kids. all i have to do is go one for five, bill. i have a lot of pancakes to ruin. >> babies are a lot of work. i try to pitch in. do diapers. i don't change them. but i go you got to do this diaper. >> final question. you live in new york city when you are not hobnobbing in vegas with cher. five kids in a two bedroom. how do you do that? >> the good news, we live in a two bedroom apartment, so -- i thought it through. it's not like we're setting a goal. it just ended up we're in a two-bedroom. every year when my wife has her yearly baby, that steers off relocation. >> i want to tell everyone to buy your book so you can live out in the suburbs. >> i want to live with you, bill. >> i don't think that will happen. we can discuss it. it will be a short conversation.

>> dad is fat." a good father's day gift. >> thank you for having me. i appreciate it. another good father's day gift. just 50 tickets left for spokane. tickets for nashville, and vegas. all went on sale this morning. on deck, back to tip of the day. another magazine has put me on its cover.

back to tip of the day. i'm a cover boy again. here are more father's day gift suggestions. my three best selling books will occupy dad and diverge his attention away from you. "killing lincoln" almost two years on the best-seller list. "killing kennedy" almost a year. and dad will like the shirts and

hats. night after night, you implier president obama to explain to we citizens what is going on with the scandals. when will you accept that he doesn't give a damn? tough question, tom. no spin question. the president will have to decide soon if he will confront the questions or dodge them. if he doesn't clarify events and take action during the summer, i had agree with your conclusion. colleen, pennsylvania. beckel actually said something that made sense. we send our troops overseas to defend our constitutional rights, while the government is tramm bling them. is beckel moving to the right or is the president moving too far left, even for him. riley, enjoy your exchanges. with beckel. he is the new andy rooney.

bill, a guy who has fathered 22 children with 17 mothers says he loves women. bull. he uses women. and tennessee. very sexist coverage of that man. not a single critical word about the women who allowed themselves to be impregnated. >> valid point, the women are fools. and as a brit, pamela anderson's commercial doesn't offend me, but your giving free publicity to tommy robinson of the british defense league does, bill. they are racist thugs. he was challenged here. mark, jerusalem. bill, we love you in israel. o.r. in hebrew means light. let there be more of it. susan of west des moines, iowa. mr. hotes is an amazing american by donating $1 million toward buying track chairs for our

amputee vets, he defines patriotism. on monday, we might have another stunning announcement to get all american amputees from iraq and afghanistan, these track chairs. when you hear it, i think you will be very interested. not easy what we're trying to do. "the factor ". >> terry: of the day once again. a magazine will frighten the populous by putting me on the cover. this "usa weekend" will feature an article written by me on volunteerism, helping other americans who need help. this coming wednesday, i'll open the conference on volunteering and service in washington, d.c. and the "usa" piece explains all of that, i am happy that they asked me to do it. if somebody asks you to help a charitable enterprise, do it if you can.

please check out the article, we have posted it on billo'reily.com. a very interesting poll question on billo'reily.com. "factor" tip of the day. that is it for us tonight. we would like to join us anywhere on the world. and if you wish to opine, wort of the day, mountebank. huh. thanks for watching. please remember the spin stops here. we are definitely looking out for you.

♪>> good morning everyone. i am patti ann browne. >> and i am heather nauert. it is friday june the 14th. thank you for getting up with us and watching "fox & friends first". >> a fun night takes a terrible turn in miami, florida. dozens of people at a packed sports bar plunge right into the water when the patio they were on suddenly gave way. >> first we heard like a crack and then it was within seconds that the whole deck had collapsed into the water. my concern is i don't know how deep that water is. we were able to get out of the way with