we'll see you again tomorrow night. don't forget, october 7th, 7:00 p.m. eastern, big news we'll have a great show. good night from washington. hello, everyone. it's 5:00 in new york city. this is "the five." we are learning today more about the gunman who opened fire tea washington navy yard yesterday and about the 12 victims that he killed. the victims range in age from 50 to 73. earlier the fbi and d.c. authorities gave a new update on the shooting. they say that 34-year-old former navy reservist aaron alexis acted alone and the investigation is now focused on evidence recovery and information gathering. many questions remain unanswered. take a listen. >> as we have moved from a

crisis stage into the investigative stage of this case, our focus and efforts are going to be on answering the questions that we all have. what caused this individual to kill so many innocent men and women? how did he carry out and plan this attack? how did he get access to the weapons? what could have been done to prevent this tragedy? and most importantly, whether anyone else aided or assisted him wittingly or unwittingly in this tragedy. >> 24 hours ago we sat here and talked about this as it was unfolding right before we went to air there was still question of whether or not there was a second shooter or somebody that had helped alexis to commit these murders. now we know a lot more. one of the main questions that we talked about yesterday was how could he possibly have had access and gotten onto the navy yard base with a weapon but it

turns out he had legitimate access to it the navy yard. a valid pass. so that's not even in question anymore. he had clearance. >> yeah. there's some questions of whether that pass should have been invalidated. he was fired on the friday before. it should have been taken out of the system. at the end of the show, i said how long before the left starts pointing the finger at gun control and looks for more gun control and all night last night the liberals who are looking for more gun control or against handguns or whatever, were pumping their case based on a false report that this was an ar-15 assault rifle. a report out saying it was. it wasn't. it was a shotgun. it was probably legally purchased and brought -- he rushed the gate as the commander told us last night. it was breaking news last night. i need to point something out though. in 1993, bill clinton used

executive order, an executive order, to make sure that military bases -- you weren't allowed to carry a firearm on a military base even if you are trained and licenseded to have a firearm. this probably would have been thwarted if that law was in effect. ft. hood would have been thwarted if that law was in effect. there are a lot of things to point your finger at. i would look at the mental health of this guy before i look at passes. >> we'll talk about gun control issues coming up. i want to make sure that we have enough time to do that. bob, can i get your thoughts about the complex portrait that we're getting of him. yesterday we heard that he might have had some run ins with the law. that happens to be true. he was cleared in one of those. then there is a portrait that he went to thailand and he wanted to be a buddhist and he spoke fluent thai and would spend six hours a day at temple on a sunday but another one said he carried a gun because he was paranoid people would steal his

belongings and he would play violent video games, call of duty his favorite, for hours on end too. someone like this in the navy got in trouble. was released from the navy. i don't know dishonorable or not. then he comes back as a contractor. has access and has weapons. >> that's the whole point here. he was dismissed from the navy because of a series of mental problems. and yet he was allowed to come back onto a base with capacity as contractor with secret clearance. this guy practiced buddhism which is probably the most peaceful of all religions in the world. he went to temple. he lived with some thai people, a thai family for several months and then went to thailand. now, i've been to thailand several times but not to go to temple. so i don't know exactly -- it's a very mixed picture. this is a guy that clearly one thing is not in doubt and this is a guy with a lot of problems

and people knew about it. >> andrea, on mental health question, we've only been doing this show two years. i can remember just three times in the last year that we've talked about a major shooting rampage where you had somebody that had some sort of problem with mental illness in the past and yet we still haven't figured out a way even to start to crack that nut. on the mental health question, what do you think we should, if anything -- what could be done to prevent something like this from happening? >> i think specifically with the military because the instance that i remember of course is ft. hood where hasan had made his plans known to a board of army psychologists. it appears and bob mentioned this that he was being treated for mental illness. there was a documented history that the navy was aware of. the question becomes who dropped the ball and why? did they drop it because of political correctness like in the case of hasan.

maybe that's too smtigmatizing for the military to talk about it. did he suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder. the question becomes when you see signs of this and there were pervasive signs, clear signs, just a couple months ago, why did he not be declared unfit? why did he have that clearance? he was fired on a friday. why was he allowed back on the bases. with major nadal hasan, the only reason 13 people were mowed down and not more, a woman from an off-base station came on with her firearm and stopped him. same thing with virginia tech. they came from no-gun zone to campus to stop the shooter. there was nobody on that base that could have stopped him and this is my issue. we trust these guys and these gals with armory, ammunition, all of these types of things. we trust them to keep us safe but we don't trust them to have firearms on the base.

to me it's a huge injustice. >> many different angles there. on the buddhist question, are you buying the idea that he was searching for something and thought buddhism was the place where he could find some peace? >> i don't know. i really don't care. i mean, the desire to know more about the villain than the victim is not healthy. it creates more villains. it's a good exercise to restrain your curious urges because healthy amounts of attention come at the expense of the victim later when people start romanticizing such things. >> i'm not trying to romanticize him. we're having a discussion about what happened. >> i guess what i'm saying is i don't care if he was a buddhist. i don't care that he liked to drink, all that crap. it doesn't matter to me. what matters to me is the amount of media that is devoted to this stuff, creates homicide by media in my mind. coverage of them actually

accelerates or creates more of these guys. the sandy hook shooter emulated the norway fiend. >> can i throw something in here? gabby giffords, holmes, the guy that shot up the movie theater, adam lanza, and now alexis. they had mental illness. all you hear about are video games and guns. all day long and all night last night video games and guns. you can't blame the video games and guns. if a criminal drinks a fifth of vodka, steals a car and goes and mows down some school kid, do you blame the car or the fifth of vodka? no. you blame the criminal. this is what we should be doing. focusing on this guy, aaron alexis and his mental issues and how he got guns with mental problems. there in lies the problem. >> i was going to get into that but we're saving that for the next segment. one thing we can say about

almost all of these people is that they all have mental problems. if you look at it, which one of these people -- who would do this if he didn't have a mental problem, right? almost by definition anybody that goes and shoots a bunch of people has a mental problem. >> let's talk about the victims a little bit. we mentioned that the age range was ages 50 to 73. these are all people who had chosen their career to work for the government. they were entrusted with all of our information -- this is where we have secret weapons systems are designed. you had people -- one of the victims was the surviving spouse said he and his wife were just about ready to start spending their retirement years and that was over. you know, only 8:20 in the morning when all of this started. they were already at work. they gathered in the cafeteria which is a common thing to do and i'm sure they were probably talking about how terrible the redskins were on sunday. how do you think we can best pay

tribute to these victims? >> i think by just talking about them the way that you are, dana. they are the ones we should focus on. greg is right. they are heroes. they were in senior positions in the military as well. that's why he sought them out, many of them, because he was angry they were in a supervisor role and he felt he was wronged and so he took it to the top with grievances. you are dealing with somebody so what if he watched 16 hours of violent video games, a lot of people do that and don't pick up guns and go out deliberately and shoot these people who are innocent and end their lives and it is such a tragedy again for the military that is already dealing with so much especially these families. >> what do you think will happen now on military bases about clearances for all sorts of individuals? >> i don't know. here's the thing, if he was fired on friday then this is

workplace violence. does that mean the obama administration will call it terror? it will be like opposite day. i don't know. nothing ever really changes. going back to the point about military bases not being armed, gun-free zones don't do much of any good for anybody. video games. a lot of talk about these video games. i looked it up. 2012 you have $15 billion that's double since 2002. you see a huge increase in use of video games. no correspondent rise in mass killing that fall in line. that argument to me is not a valid one whatsoever. i think there is more of -- the killers have a fascination with reality and not with fantasy. they look and emulate the things that they see that will bring them immortality, attention and fame and we give that to them every time this happens. >> maybe i'm missing something here. it seems to me the last ten years has been a lot of this

stuff going on and prior to that i don't remember as much as we've seen here. i'm not denying your statistics. >> it's a small fraction when you look at the numbers of actual crimes and shootings like in chicago for example. it's almost 2,000 incidents of shooting. 300 dead so far this year. this type of mass shooting makes up such a small fraction but it garners such a huge portion of media attention. i'm really curious to know and i wonder if this will come out, how many people that were killed are gun owners and if they wished they could have had their firearm with them that day. i'm guessing there's probably a few that would have been able to protect themselves. >> also on video games, grand theft auto 5 came out last night at midnight. they'll sell about $2 billion worth of that video game. who is the jackass who pointed the finger at video games? violent, sure. so are movies. we are bombarded -- music. we are bombarded with violence. why is it video games?

>> where did you hear about video games? how did he get a shotgun? >> that's the fact. >> just a shotgun to do all that damage? >> with the shotgun he took two handguns from security. he had two handguns and a shotgun. >> he overpowered security to get it. >> immediately they're going to blame an ar-15 because it looks like one so they immediately went to ar-15 with multiple bullet magazines and it was wrong. a false report. of course the left jumped on it president. >> we'll talk about that next because you knew it was coming. some lawmakers and gun control activists politicizing the event. we'll fill you in on it when we come back.

>> after yesterday's shooting at the d.c. navy yard, it took no time at all for democrats and other gun control activists to politicize the tragedy. senator feinstein called on congress to stop shirking it's

responsibility and resume a thoughtful debate on gun violence in this country. and henry winkler sarcastically tweeted, please america, do nothing to promote gun control as that's how we roll until we all shot each other. do you think it was appropriate to do this on the same day that 13 people were gunned down? >> i did and i will continue to believe that. here's a guy with clearly mental illness. it was documented. navy knew about it. he was able to purchase a shotgun. what does that tell you? >> he listened to joe biden advice. he said go out and buy a shotgun. >> in this country you can be a fruitcake and buy a gun and shoot up 13 people. if he wasn't able to buy that gun and maybe someone gave him the gun, i don't know. >> don't you think there's a messaging problem on biden on the go out and buy a shotgun advice he was giving during the gun control debate.

>> i don't remember much about it. >> you tistill have to have a background check. >> do you think he had a background check? >> if he brought it legally he did. nothing on his background check said he had mental issues. background checks are good for finding felons that want to buy a gun. they'll stop that. that's easy. law enforcement shares information. the problem is if someone is checked into a mental institution in new jersey and goes and tries to buy a gun in control, they don't share that information and no one knows so if he doesn't have a criminal background, you can get a gun. what needs to happen is you need to beef up that system. if people have mental illness, if there's a history of domestic violence, those types of things, they have to share. they don't do that. >> let's write it into the law. >> the right isn't complaining about that. the right isn't saying don't do that. you on the left want to point your finger at the right. the right is okay with that. that's fine. >> where were they then during

the discussion on the bill that was -- >> the bill wasn't for that. the bill was for national gun re registry. >> that wasn't going to have mental health reporting and involuntary detention of these people at a mental hospital. if that's where america decides that it wants to go, maybe that's appropriate. that wasn't what the discussion was on the bill. he did go through a background check. let's say for example the shooting that he did through his ceiling to his neighbors, she says that she thought there was malice in it. the cops came. they did an investigation. ultimately they didn't press charges against him. there's not at record of it. >> clearly there was a record and someone found out when they were investigating this guy. >> later on. >> you have to be convicted of a felony or domestic violence or some sort of violence. >> insurance companies keep the

records on everybody who uses insurance to go to hospitals or mental hospitals, whatever. >> but you have to be careful with that as well. there's as lot of fear that insurance companies keeping mental health records and government getti inting those rs with obama care and if i'm in a shrink office and i hate my job and i'm a conservative and my boss is angering me. >> you're okay with insurance companies having that? >> making sure they can't get a gun it there's fear by putting mental health legislation -- i would like to get greg in here one second. just week remember the chick-fil-a shooter in washington, d.c.? you do not hear from the media or from the left any cries about guns or gun control when you have a liberal activist with a backpack trying to gun down "as many people as he could." >> it doesn't fit the story line, it's not a story.

the point that we were starting this discussion was politicizing an event quickly after it happens. if you think you have a practical solution that actually solves a problem, you have every right to politicize it. you should say i know how to fix this. if you're a mass illness and you knew what was causing that illness as a doctor, you have every right to say that. with gun control, the sentiment is emotionally driven and not fact based. if you as a person believes in gun rights and owns a gun, your statistics, your cold, hard unfriendly facts are actually right but they aren't acceptable as an emotional response. you have to be emotional about this. the facts. most gun violence has declined like you said earlier. 559 victims over 30 years. 330,000 victims from 2000 to 2010 that are gun deaths not by this. 61% are suicides. this is not a big issue. the facts are sober and real and nobody wants them because it's

not emotional. >> here's the proposal. do you have a problem if you have been in a mental institution and i try to buy a gun -- >> that's all there. you cannot buy a gun if you are put into a -- a nonvoluntary -- right. if you are put in a mental i institution in new jersey and try to buy a gun in new jersey, you can't buy a gun. >> go to pennsylvania and buy a gun. >> we need information sharing. >> there's a solution. >> the left wants to point fingers at guns. 11,000 guns caused murders. 444,000 cigarettes. car accidents accounteded for 40,000. alcohol, 80,000. but they blame the person in every single example with the exception of guns and now they want to blame the guns. >> i think the left and democrats would have more credibility if they spoke up about gun violence in liberal areas like chicago and started to talk about that or gun-free zones. if you look at it, less than 0.1

of 1% of the people murdered in mass murders over the last 30 years,4 small fraction. it's a huge deal. i'm guilty of it. i called for no more gun-free zones on military installments. i could be blamed yesterday for doing the same thing. i spoke out because that's what i believe. >> you think everyone should have had a gun? if they had a gun from home, they should have brought it on the installment? >> yes. >> there are guns used to protect itthemselves. they can use emotionally driven arguments that have no basis. >> here's a fact. the fact is the gun advocates say that 2 million people a year use guns to protect themselves. now, that's just unmitigated bull. >> you'll have to talk to president obama who commissioned that study last year. >> this is the florida one. >> there's a new one president

obama commissioned after sandy hook that found up to 300,000 to 2 million people use guns for self-defenses purposes. >> the mayor of washington, d.c. is blaming this one on the sequester. grasping at straws. mainstream media did not come out of this shining like a star at all. the fact that a lot of people went to bed last night thinking the shooter used an ar-15 when there wasn't an ar-15 on the scene is despicable. >> dianne feinstein, who used a gun to protect herself years ago? and here's one that has no idea what he's talking about. >> guns don't kill people, people kill people. i say people with guns kill people. >> guess what? us people need to get out of this segment. i don't know. the control room will go after me. coming up, abc went out trying to stereotype americans on their hidden camera show but a u.s. soldier didn't give producer

what they hoped for. wait until you hear how the hero handled the setup. fox news announces changes to the prime time lineup. we'll tell you all about it when we come back.

>> so abc's tv series called "what would you do" where actors appear to be bullying bigots while hidden cameras tape to see if bystanders will step in. a cashier bullies a transgender woman. a man drops a wine bottle in the store and blames the latino clerk. a mormon family tries to convince a weeping underage

bride to accept her life and then a bigot abuses a muslim clerk but he's confronted by a soldier who tells him to knock it out. >> this guy is a muslim. >> we live in america. >> aren't you fighting against these guys? >> not at the moment. right now i'm ordering a sandwich. >> i don't think he should be working here. >> buy your chips and move out. >> he doesn't follow orders. >> i would like to order food just not from you. >> get out. put the chips down and go buy them some place else. you have a choice to shop anywhere. i wear the uniform so anyone can live free in this country. >> do you see a trend? it's a tolerance exam created by professors who assume the worst in all of us. producers. i was looking at bob. producers. it's candid camera for coastal

elitist in which the villain is a cartoon, a dumb hick who hates other people. it should be called are you as progressive as a fifth grader because that's the level of intelligence. if bystanders don't condemn the behavior than the producers were right about our bigotry. if a person like that soldier reacts heroically it's met with surprise. the veteran we baited is not bigoted after all. the real truth since finding real bigots is hard, the show must create fake ones to ensnare people so you can be racist just by minding you are own business in a store which should piss off real racists that make the effort. this show is pretty entertaining. it's a great idea. it's not always like pc stuff. there is a driving element in there to say look how red necky america is.

>> i don't like it. i don't like prank shows. i don't like setups. i don't like trying to trap people. i think that's what they were doing. i can't get in the mind of these producers but if they're going to stage something like that, they have to expect the outcome could go one of two ways and i bet they were not expecting that to be the outcome. >> i think that's true. i think they assume a guy in fatigues would probably be intolerant. good for them for showing it, bob, right? what do you make of this show? >> i'm listening to andrea and glad to hear you say that. it was the right and conservatives that were for that twirp and girlfriend and did hidden camera on an acorn and made sure everyone was against a.c.o.r.n. >> a.c.o.r.n. was real. this is fake. >> the people who were doing it were not real. they were fake. >> a.c.o.r.n. was real. >> a couple thoughts.

i agree with andrea. i hate those contrived setups i like candid camera where they get people to say things. no surprise our military stood up and said the right thing. very proud of that. you have to agree to let that stuff air afterwards. the only thing would be interesting is to see things that were so bad they wouldn't agree to it. >> you have to sign a release. the racist, american flag on a shirt, like they fabricated him by let's see -- it was a co composite stereotype. kind of like what i do with professors. >> across america in all universities. you have to wonder with these producers that went to college, didn't they want to create

awesome television? i do wonder, you have reality tv inexpensive to produce. then they have to make up scenarios because reality tv is eating itself. >> i think it's really clever. can we show one? here's another instance where this would never happen in real life. it's a father trying to buy booze for his kid but the kid doesn't want the booze. when does this happen? look at this. >> kids are going to have fun. you'll fit right in. a little vodka. we need vodka. >> we don't need vodka, dad. i don't want to go overboard. can we get coke. >> grab some soda, too. >> this woman enters the store and immediately takes notice of father and son. >> that's underage drinking. you cannot buy it. >> all the kids are doing it. >> you'll be the one arrested. you can't sell it to him. you can't sell it to him. i'm not going to stay here.

>> what a busy body. that would never happen. that would never happen in real life. >> it would not happen in my liquor store if i was there with my son. no, dad, get that one. i like that one over there. >> there are people like eric to get it for me. >> these producers of the show goes back to difference between being racist and being prejudice. i don't care. you show me one person that isn't prejudice in this country that doesn't prejudge. if it's late at night, if i'm in a car, i always use the example i see someone walking behind me, i'll lock my doors. that doesn't make any prejudice. everyone does it. they prejudge. >> can we get out of here? my segment is 15 seconds. >> i would be happy to get out of this, bob. >> professor. >> what's more detrimental to your health? one author says there's no greater danger than inactivity.

we'll discuss the war on football. we have another war. war on christmas is over. guess who is to blame?

♪ >> author daniel flynn has a message for all of the alarmist warning about the dangers of football. "we should encourage sports, not slobs." he argues that the drum beat on football violence has hurt participation leading to a society of fat sos. this is another indication of how america will hurt us in the future. the obvious thing would be to go to bob right now. i don't want to. i want to go to danica. she's our resident expert on football. >> i do like exercise. i don't have children.

i don't play football. i think the more exercise is probably better. >> better? >> you are taking quite a stance there. we'll get a lot of letters. how dare you advocate exercise. >> your thoughts, my man? >> okay. two things or maybe three. sports, worst thing about sports is infusion of pop culture. i get a head injury when i watch the super bowl halftime show. that's more dangerous. number two, female cheerleaders is the most dangerous sport in america is female cheerleading which is why i set up my own clinic in my apartment for all of the injuries. >> what about male cheerleaders? are they welcome? >> third one. most popular sport in america is scamming. americans try to get as much money from government. >> we have a segment on that coming up. >> you spoke to this author? >> i think he's right. i do think there's a war on football. i think football is uniquely american and i think if you look at the history of it, president

teddy roosevelt loved football and thought it was an awesome pastime and great way to train our men and women and there's lot of similarities to the military. think of the language they use. touching down, ground game, different language. throwing bombs down the field. you are protecting one another. these guys on the field take orders from a coach. they follow instructions. they're excellent leaders when they come out. that's why roosevelt thought it was so important that it was part of our culture that men were playing football and he encouraged it. it's a great sport. this culture now, multiculturalism get away from football and get away from uniquely american and encouraging accomplishment. >> start a few companies. hired a lot of people. across the board the best hires are the ones with a sports background or military background. >> you get knocked down. keep trying. fight until the end. play until after the whistle. your thoughts? the left wants to wussify

america. >> there are a lot of sports you can play besides football. i played football for a lot of years as you know. there are a lot of people i know who played with me in college who are hurt to this day and have arthritis and a lot of problems. football players are getting bigger and stronger. plays are more complex. for younger people, someone asked me if they had kids should they play football or soccer? i would say play soccer. >> what? don't listen anybody. >> did you hire anyone with a speech team background? that would have been awesome. >> coming up, still to come, a fox news channel has a big announcement. don't want to miss it. today is an important day in our history. can you guess why? >> this is the third year we've done this together.

♪ some kind of wonderful ♪ some kind of wonderful >> all right. to a subject that i know nothing about, of course, which is cheating. new research shows people who get away with cheating are being

dishonest and are more likely to feel good about themselves than remorseful. now being the prime cheater at this table, how do you feel about it? >> i guess if you run a red light or you know you're speeding and you pass a cop on the side of the road but don't get a ticket, you feel good. i don't feel good. i just continue to be nervous. i haven't driven in three years. that's not a good example. >> you didn't cheat at anything, right? >> i've always been very, very honest about my achievements. there's two camps in cheating. there's the person that cheats and the person that pressures you to cheat with them. i always wondered what happened to the cheater. always the eddie haskell. i told this story many times. barry bonds used to sit next to me in spanish class and useded to kick my chair. i would have to move my test to the end so he could look at it because he was a jock and that

didn't help him, eric. >> he ended up cheating. and his head got giant. >> what's the biggest cheating thing you ever did? >> i don't cheat. i sat in a trading pit with 3,000 guys on a trading floor, they were stealing and cheated? >> i never did. not once. i hate it. my father taught me -- >> how about at school. how about a girlfriend? >> if you only gave him a five, you give him the money back, no i'm very honest that way to a fault. i will tell you the biggest cheating scandal in the history of mankind though. >> what's that? >> climate gate. >> oh, yeah, sure. >> bob -- >> get out of here! angie, these people are dishonest when they say, they didn't cheat. you cheated somewhere. >> i had a question during the commercial break, so i'm really bad at math. so in junior high -- had math class in the afternoon. so i asked other students who

had the tests earlier in the day, what was on the test? is that cheating? and dana perino, was that cheating? >> no. >> that's the most you said -- >> she said that was research. >> let me tell you. i'll own up to it. when i was in college there was a philosophy professor who gave the same test every year, multiple choice. so a couple of my buddies broke into the place and got the exam. we all took it and put it on our pencils. then we filled it out, exactly the way it was. it was first time he changed the test in ten years and we all flunked. but mostly i cheated on -- >> dana has a good story. >> when i was in third grade, the girl next to me asked if she could look on my spelling test. during the spelling test. so i was nervous about letting her do it, but i said yes you can do it and we were supposed to be in reading period and i

got called up to teacher's test and mr. brown said, dana, why did you turn in two spelling tests? but the -- what had happened was the girl had copied my entire paper including my name up at the top. >> that's amazing. >> wow. >> i once did a math test and i cheated with the person next to me. i had two different math tests so i flunked that one too. of course i flunked just about everything. okay, "one more thing" is up next. ♪

♪ time now for "one more thing." exciting news from fox today about the primetime lineup that people have been waiting to hear what it's going to be. here we have it. "on the record" will be at 7:00. you've your old bill o'reilly at 08 clock p.m. and megyn kelly at 9:00 and sean is going to 10:00. i guess the same show. guess what? "the five" stays at 5:00 and "red eye" at 3:00 a.m. >> you can't have it anywhere else. >> like when we did an 11:00 p.m. show. >> like when you did the intro. >> i was completely confused and exhausted. >> we'd have five people? >> have 11 people. if you move it to seven, you

have seven people. or else people get confused. we should have it at 1:00 a.m. and we should have one person -- me. >> bob. he's up then anyway. >> bob is not alone at 1:00, greg. he's usually surrounded. >> all right. that went great. eric, for the third anniversary of this day -- >> right. i swear to god i had no idea, i had done this three times in a row. today is constitution day. it's the 226th seeming of the u.s. constitution, so it's the third time, can i do this quickly. a little quiz. "washington post" had a quiz today. what does the senate want to call the president? king, the president of the united states or c, quote his highness the president of america and the protector of their liberties? >> "c." >> correct. very good. >> i thought it was a trick question. >> no trick question, that president obama wants to revert back to his highness -- no, i'm

kidding. how many of the 13 states needed to ratify it to become the united states? >> ten. >> anybody? >> 50. >> i was terrible at math. >> nine. >> i didn't get the answer before hand. >> nine. >> i love a quiz. >> great quiz in "the washington post," guys. >> okay. greg? your turn. >> i haven't done a banned phrase in almost two days. eyeball. people, websites, media, they say we're competing for eyeballs, just say viewers or readers because what about blind people? this the totally racist and bigoted and wrong and shut up! i don't know if it's racist. >> racist against people with one eye. >> yeah. it's eyist. >> andrea is next. >> okay. shea telly has been waiting his entire life do this. he's not your typical player, but watch. >> stely on the carry.

touchdown. >> that is it. cecelia high school. he has muscular dystrophy. he shows up for every practice and the coach decided to put him in the game and he won it. >> good for him. >> can you imagine if someone tackled him? bob would have. >> i ran into an old friend today who is here in the fox studios because he was promoting his new show. that's mike tyson. i beat him -- >> is he on the right? >> yeah. that's fine. a new six-part series called "being mike tyson." it will air starting sunday night, 22nd of september and then after that on fox sports 1. what did you say?

>> 20 hard. >> 20 hard? >> get a face tattoo. >> 20 hard. >> 20 hard. welcome to "red eye." it is like this is your life if by your life you mean my last show i will ever do as a man. due to andy levy sufflok -- suffocating under a box of clothes there will be no half time. let's welcome our guests. she is hotter than a pawnshop wrist watch. i am here with a first time guest, miss new york, miss usa. she even waives like a beauty queen. look at that of the i can't stop looking at that name. filling in for andy levy is the chilean wine expert. he is considered one of the three men in the world who can