tv Red Eye FOX News September 19, 2013 12:00am-1:01am PDT
12:00 am
congratulations, mark wahlberg, on getting your diploma. >> good luck tomorrow. there's 40 second left. >> bob, it's not your -- >> bob, it's not your -- welcome to "red eye." i'm tom shillue in for greg gutfeld who told me it is none of your business where he is tonight, but he will be back tomorrow. that said, let's welcome our guests. well, i met her after i retired from major league baseball to become a live in housekeeper. i would loik to think i taught her and her brother some available lifeless sons. i am here with allison barber. and i met him when i was night judge in court. he was a sex-obsessed nare saw cystic prosecutor who would do anything to get a woman to sleep with him. now she called andy levy. and we bonded in the late
12:01 am
80s raising our daughters. we dated her mom before she died and never figured out who the father was. but we are best of friends, it is bill schulz. and we were strangers until he left the mediterranean to move in with me. turns out he was my cousin. >> what? >> it was a perfect match. sitting next to me, remi. >> a block. the lede. that's the first story. >> skin me man in the -- skin me man in the tie. where does that voice come from? >> would you be so kind to leave your gun behind? tired of being caught up in the national debate, starbucks, a coffee chain apparently, is now asking customers not to bring their weapons into stores. the company says the policy changing is not a response to the navy yard shootingr newtown. here is the ceo, howard schulz, discussing it with neil cavuto. >> starbucks is not a policy
12:02 am
maker and we are not pro or anti-gun. we have just come to a conclusion that in the best interest of sour customers and people -- of our customers and people, customers carrying guns illegally should not bring them into a starbucks store. we also said this is not a ban. anyone carrying a gun we will serve them with a smile. we won't make them feel uncomfortable, but it is in the best interest of our own company if guns are not part of the starbucks experience. >> and he mentioned that now this will be part of the starbucks experience. >> is he from "breaking bad"? >> they followed the local laws on open carry.
12:03 am
did they thrust themselves into a a situation they can't deal with? is this good for business or bad? >> it is a business decision more than a political decision. yeah, to some it may be annoying that you can't bring your gun into starbucks. you know what else is annoying that you can't bring into starbucks? $4. it is a free country and people should just deal with it. >> i get the americano and it is $2.20. >> i am overpaying for americano. >> if you don't like cream in your coffee you would do well to get black. >> the dye sell. >> -- the diesel. >> is this political correctness? >> i don't think so. it is a good idea that paying the prices at starbucks makes them feel like shooting somebody. i think this is how it should work. a business owner should be free to set his or her own policy about bringing a firearm into the business. i like how he is doing it. he is respectfully requesting it and not den gnaw grating
12:04 am
gun owners. i think gun owners should not be [bleep] about this. >> aren't they going to be? >> they shouldn't be. >> now that he suggested it, don't you think they will up the ante here and show up to the store with their gun sticking out? >> they might and they are wrong to do that. i believe in a right to own a gun and a right to private property which includes a business owner setting his or her own policy. conservatives should respect that. >> allison, you bring your gun to starbucks and you use it as a stirrer. i'm sure you disagree with this. >> and i will absolutely still bring my gun to starbucks. i think it is a silly thing because despite what he said about being neutral to vocally come out and disassociate yourself you are endorsing another. what he is saying is a farce. are you disagreeing with me? he is staying neutral and says
12:05 am
please don't bring it in. he is taking a stand on the issue. i agrees you would call it anti-gun jie.. >> he may be lessening the fiewr error. >> if you are going to take a stand, take a stand. but it seems like a silly way to maybe get people mad. we are not pro gun, but we are not anti-gun, but please don't bring your gun in. >> it is public relations. we know the kind of people that hang out at starbucks. i won't make fun of starbucks. i know everyone does. it is a great company. i know he is left wing. i read his book. they are great and they cater to a lot of urban dwelling people. they cater to a liberal crowd. this is good pr for him. what do you think? >> i am certainly not going to make fun of starbucks, because i don't know if i am related to howard schulz. until i find that out i will look up at that sweet, sweet coffee can.
12:06 am
>> you are related to a lot of schulz. >> no, i am not. i am not related to charles schulz. i don't have a t in my main so i don't have the star -- starbucks money. thanks a lot, you jerk. this is the weak ease disassociation i have seen in my life. to this point i don't know why he made the announcement. if are you a gun owner and you are offended by the weak, trying to tow the line and they will serve you. if that somehow still bothers you, you don't need a gloc at your side. you need to get laid. >> that's what i'm saying when i say that gun owners should respect his opinion. he did it in a civil manner. he didn't call them names like anti-gun people tend to do. and don't bring your gun to starbucks if the owner of starbucks would prefer you do not. >> we know the reason he suggested it. i am remembering what he said in the interview that he didn't want his bar sigh tas to get in -- baristas to get
12:07 am
in confrontations. >> not once, but twice last year a gun went off in a woman's purse while she was in line at starbucks. that would deter me. >> how does it go off in the purse? >> i don't know. i am not a woman, dude. >> that is the bigger issue is that women should not be allowed to own guns. >> thank you. and women should not be allowed to go out by themselves and buy coffee all willyathx3e d,qjfr
12:08 am
>> but that wasn't true. it didn't matter. he had his story ready. he just waited for the facts to come in to plug them into the story. that is what so much of the media has always been. people often talk about the environment where information spreads rapidly around the world. they long for the day we got our stories from those old, trusted news sources. but i never trusted them. why? because media is all storytelling. the drawing of a picture, if you will. facts are just dots in that connect the dot drawing. in the old days, we let big media not only choose the
12:09 am
dots, but we left them to do the drawing for us. we thought we were reading a newspaper, but we were reading a comic book. when i have a problem with a news story, it rarely has to do with the facts. it has to do with the drawing that someone else makes with the facts. what i like about this age of media over saturation is the facts right and wrong spill out so fast that there is no time for someone else to draw the picture for us. we get to participate in the drawing. that upsets old media and not me. give me more information, less trust. >> andy, i will go to you first. you always disagree with my to hell with the facts stance. where am i going wrong this time? >> tom, you ignorant slut. i am a little confused by this because the last time you hosted you insisted that the facts didn't matter. now you are saying that you don't really -- >> you know what, this whole moment with tom was to clarify
12:10 am
from all of the guff i got on twitter after the last show -- >> for being wrong? >> i wanted to clarify that i wasn't saying to heck with the fact,poo-poo the fact, this was a wonderful analogy, they are dots in a picture and we are letting someone else draw the picture. i don't care about the dots. i care about the picture. >> if you don't care about the dots, you don't care when the facts are incorrect. ie, when they are not fact. >> now i don't know what you just said. remi, i know you will agree with me. you are a new media guy and all over the youtubes. aren't you sick of the old guard telling us what kind of pictures we will draw with our connect the dots? >> it is like we have all written things. wouldn't you be embarrassed that something you wrote was just still out there? it was factually incorrect? >> i read this off the paper today. they are leaving it on the web. you know why?
12:11 am
well, let me assume what he would say. the spirit of the story is correct if the underling fact is not true. i agree with what i wrote. he wrote the article before it ever happened. >> and it is not -- it is unedited. there is a pref physician on it it -- preface on it that says this is wrong, but we are running it anyway. we have reputable sources which at this point, if they were wrong, there you go. how reputable are they? i guess agenda trumped facts on this and somehow the newspapers are dying. >> it is not just this story. this is endemic of everything. we have got to stop having these people write our stories for us. ellis son, you are in journalism. it is this so-called professional -- do you agree with me that it is out of hand? we are letting others write the story for us. >> if this was a story i had written as a blossoming journalist i would be
12:12 am
mortified and want it off. the initial mistake was understandable because there were reports there was an ar15 on the scene and perhaps law enforcement used it. the initial mistake was uppedzable, but to -- understandable, but to not correct it -- like you said in the beginning people do point to bloggers under mining journalism and this is an example of what is supposed to be traditional journalism and it is degrading a field i love. >> you are a blossoming journalist. that was beautiful. >> i think that was one of the shows i referenced. bill i know you agree with me because you rarely let facts get in the way of your desire to phone in your appearance on the show. >> as team old media i spout out and send rasberries. back in my day we would stop the presses usually for something the scoop highlighted and reported on and we cross the t's and dot the i's. now that it is on the internet it is who can get it up there
12:13 am
faster without fact checking. it is all about the hits, the hits you see. it is the inter web. i want to take my prescott and throw it at your face! >> stop with the accent. >> it wasn't the accent as much as the spiting. >> back in my day we smoked cigars out back. >> the bigger problem for me in all of this is you've got the daily news kind of thing and they have now put a thing up saying the fact was wrong. what i don't like is when peel like piers morgan spent the day talking about the ar15 this and the ar15 that. and the next day there was no ar15. he tweets, lots of confusion over what guns in the navy yard used. does it matter to the victims? there was no confusion. the fbi and the police said there were no ar15's. second of all i don't think it mattered to piers morgan.
12:14 am
that is just awful. >> it is like the old love story quote. being piers morgan means never having to say you are sorry. do these facts matter? >> they have that pre preconceived notion and they have the picture, if you will and they plug in the facts. when the facts change they pull them out. it is happening with global warming. they have a narrative. really what i am saying is that the -- as far as journalism goes, they don't care about the facts. they care about the story. >> that's just like you. >> exactly. >> you shouldn't have a problem with it. >> people should pay attention to my stories and not their stories. >> well, we all -- we all out learned you. from guns to buns. that's cute. does porn make us more enlightened 1234* no, no. quite the contrary. according to research, love
12:15 am
those recipes, ladies, people who watch pornography are less likely to support affirmative action for women. looking at smut made males and females less likely to prefer preferential treatment for women. they say likely porn turns women to items of derision and object tau fight. in researching this story i came upon a video i found alarming. it is graphic so sensitive viewers should sit closer to the tv so they can see it better. >> i love the jazz soundtrack. >> can we even show that? >> allison, two-partquestion. what do you make of this study and do you find yourself becoming more sexist as you watch a lot of porn ace heard
12:16 am
you do? >> i think porn is disgusting. i think it is massage nistic. i think it reinforces ideas of massagony. >> boo. >> i disagree with the idea of sexist in this story. sexist as being you don't support uh affirmative action. i think you can make the opposite argument that by supporting affirmative action that has an adverse affect in not making women equal, it probably, definitely does elevate some sexist ideas, but the way they define sexism in this it is wrong. >> i see. that is an interesting idea. i am sexist, but against porn. do i have a place in this discussion? do you see what i mean? >> yes. >> these feminist websites that quoted the study, i agree with them, but for the wrong reasons. i don't like porn because it is ungentlemanly and it is -- >> uncouth. >> in a victorian sense i am
12:17 am
against porn. what do you think? >> i agree with you. that's the short answer. the whole theme of pornography is object tau pho location. it doesn't mirror reality. i am just as happy as the next guy when the pizza arrives. but it does not mirror reality. >> you mean the pizza in the porn film? >> yes. >> because the pizza comes with free sexual intercourse? >> i think that is basically -- >> that was the name of one of the videos. the pizza man brings free sexual intercourse. >> i have read a few scripts. >> andy, you are a dye cot me as well. you have great respect for em with, but you like smut. how do you -- how do you -- >> how does that work? >> i don't have to explain myself to you. second of all, i didn't appreciate your sexist love the recipes jab at the psychology of women quarterly. that was completely uncalled
12:18 am
for. >> didn't you write the segment? >> i absolutely did not. jay i wrote it and i -- >> i wrote it and i stand by it. >> you owe psychology women quarterly an apology. they don't publish recipes. >> yes, they do. >> but serious women can like meat loaf. >> they can. i agree with what ellison said. the jess bell statement says it is sexist. >> you can say it makes people equal. >> the problem is with the jesebel le e headline. in seriousness i think the result is interesting and doesn't say good things about porn and they should try to replicate the study and see if it is accurate and hopefully ask me to be a participant. more importantly it would be interesting to see a study that does attempt to find out what the jessebelle headline
12:19 am
claims. if watching porn makes people more sexist. that would be an importanting study. >> it obviously does. that's why you don't need a study. it is common sense. looking at porn is obviously object tau fying women. i wish these gals could come together. we both agree porn is bad, but they seem to think it is the patriarchy. we don't like it either because we are old-fashioned victorian-type of guy. >> who are these guys you hang out with with their canes and ascotts? welcome, how is the "red eye." >> the old patriarchy. just agree with me. >> the first to come out and say porn affect peoples this way and porn is that. people who freak out if you suggest that maybe watching violent video games has an effect. team new zealand is one win away from defeating team usa. and -- we are not doing that
12:20 am
12:22 am
12:23 am
plus, pay no interest for 3 years on beautyrest black, stearns & foster, serta icomfort, even tempur-pedic. and rest even better with sleep train's risk-free 100-day money back guarantee. but the best rest event ends sunday at sleep train. superior service best selection, lowest price, guaranteed. ♪ sleep train ♪ your ticket to a better night's sleep ♪ he is not liberal enough? george mason university's history news network asked over 200 american historians to grade barack obama's presidency. on average they gave him a b minus. the history proofers offered -- professors offered o high markss. his lowest grade, a c, came from his relationship with congress. no surprise, a majority of the respondents blame this on republicans. other grades included a c plus
12:24 am
for transparency and accountability and a b for vision and general leadership and a b minus for civil rights and liberties. so basically he is not liberal enough for them. you know what could add nothing to this story? this. >> i rase -- i was right. is a b minus too high or too low? >> no idea. i am mott in the business of embraiding. i would gladly take a b minus myself. i do think that what you noted is important to point out and this is a study of what liberal historians saw. they praise him for the affordable care act, but their
12:25 am
criticism was it didn't go far enough. >> obviously. >> i would think you have to note it is obviously skewing left with these 200 something historians. i think it is an interesting study. it is a relatively low grade from people who were predisposed to like him. i think it is significant. >> why are historians so liberal? >> that's absolutely fair to say. it is silly to ask the story and judge a president still in office. and it is silly for historians to answer. only 200 or so responded of the 600 asked. they are not supposed to to be evaluating. >> they are supposed to say i don't know right now. i am a historian. >> it is not their area of spirit tease. a b minus on civil liberties ? it is more like a d if not an f. buzz the d stand for -- does the b stand for benghazi? >> does the b stand for conspiracy?
12:26 am
think about it, america. >> they are trying to put a positive spin on it. remy, any of the grades look completely ridiculous. >> he got a b minus on national security. i almost felt bad. he said i taped all of the phones and got a b minus. >> what can he do? i felt bad when he won the nobel peace prize. everyone knew it was ridiculous. when he was accepting it it was like -- he didn't want it. >> it was embarrassing. it is embarrassing for the whole thing. i thought it was great because it lowers the stature of the nobel peace prize. >> it is not a sham. what part of peace do you not understand? >> who are these guys in finland or wherever they r. >> narnia so watch your words. >> these professors when asked they said you were one of the
12:27 am
greatest embarrass ments. and they weren't even asked about you. they volunteered the information. >> i want this stuff fact checked from now on. i will take that one. first of all, yes. if i were to have ever gotten a b minus i would have celebrated like there is no celebration before. >> it is fantastic. a lot of them say it is the fault of the do nothing republican congress and the people whose grades should count a grade. right now congress is at 19% approval rate and the best part is they have gone up 5% while they were on vacation. so they happen to agree with the history professors. they are apart from the part where they say i am an embarassment. >> congos up in my estimation as does the president. remember when they called
12:28 am
12:32 am
should too many shots come with a cost in well hangovers in britain could get more painful. police chiefs there want to put overserved a-holes in privately run drunk tanks instead of jill and hand -- instead of jail and hand them a bill in the morning. said one, i don't see why the service should pick up the care of someone who has chosen to get so drunk they can't care for themselves. we will issue them a ichs ifed penalty which will be a significant cost. and that may be a significant deterrent. clearly we must discuss this in a thing called -- >> lightning roooooouuuuuunnnnndd. lightning round. >> remy, i will not ask about your personal predelictions,
12:33 am
but what do you think? >> instead of dropping him off at a drunk tank, drop them off at a denny's. >> do they have a denny's in britain? >> well you are drunk and you should be with your people. >> what do you think? have you ever spent the night in jail because you had a few too many cocktails ? >> no, but i am tired of paying for awful you to spend the night in the drunk tank. i wish we had it in america. this is a great idea. i don't think i should have to pay for someone to spend the night in jail because they couldn't hold their liquor. it thins their resources. police are busy dealing with bill on the side of the road at night and somebody having a real emergency and they have to go over here and help somebody else when they need to get to a more pressing issue. >> i see. andy, let's take a libertarian view. aren't we the privatization guys? why don't we have this first? >> i think it is a great idea
12:34 am
in principal, but i see a couple of potential problems. the police will have to be the ones that pick up bill on the side of the road. they will taka private drunk tank place. how do you make sure bill stays in the private drunk tank a? is there law enforcement comb -- component? >> citizen arrest. >> i for one condemn you saying mr. o'reilly is a drunk. i'm sure his people would like to hear about it. >> what were you just saying? >> what will the cost be for this? they will have a fixed penalty and it will be a significant cost and significant deterrent. does that mean a working class dad who gets hammered have to pay a bill and his family can't eat for the week? how do you work out the price. >> 299. >> thrng there may be problems -- i think there may be problems with this. >> remy, do we do this in the united states?
12:35 am
we don't put people in the slammer for being drunk, do we? >> oh yeah we do. >> this is good. >> what happens is -- i had a misunderstanding at the denver airport a few years ago. what they do is -- after we couldn't decide on a conclusion they give uh breathalyzer test and based on how high you get it on there, and that's how long you are locked in the stupid drunk tank. the joke is on them because i had a dime bag in my wallet the whole time. >> did it last you the two weeks? >> no, they took the wallet. >> dime bag is slang for -- >> a bag of dimes. i can use it for protection, see. >> as a coin collector, you can get through time. >> it is a great pastime pitching pennies. i do it with my daughters. we pitch them against the curb. >> i somehow convinced the girl to bring in my book.
12:36 am
i fell asleep on the cot and i wake up and i realize that a scary looking homeless guy is in the corner reading my book. it took all of the curling i had to get it. >> i don't understand what is public intoxication? >> they will tell you you are too drunk to go on the plane and you argue with them and they will say your gestures are being threatening, when of course they weren't. next thing you know, handcuff, no wall lot, sad, on the cot and trying to sober up. >> if you are too drunk and that's why it uses up resources so it has to check on you. >> it used up my patience. >> you have had a lot of cocktails. >> what would you rather do? pay a fine or spend the night in the slammer. >> what would i rather do? >> they say you want money or the slammer? i feel like i would do the
12:37 am
slammer once because i would like to up my street credibility and that would be my road to it. >> a way to up your street credibility would be to say street cred. >> or throw around words like dime bag and things like that. >> that won't give you street cred either. according to a new study children's food allergies cost $25 billion a year. to put that in perspective, it is 25 times what i made last year from my comedy albums. the average yearly cost is $4200 with a quarter coming out of parents' pockets. it seems like it should be more. the massive price tag includes visits to emergency rooms and the cost of parents missing worth or changing jobs to care for children. remy, considering 8% of kids have allergies, is $25 billion
12:38 am
ridiculous or ridiculous? >> yes, remy, both. it goes to show the severity of the allergies. i just learned about it recently. there are no mild food allergies of the it is never like i had a cash shoe and my -- cashew and i was itchy. >> when we were a kid you forgot the lunch and they put a tub of peanut butter on your desk. >> a tub? wow. >> yes, and everyone was jealous of that kid. there was no -- >> tommy is eating the tub. >> people would sometimes forget their lunch just to hold the tub. >> do you think more kids have food allergies in -- allergies some. >> i don't remember them having them growing up.
12:39 am
i suspect it is like the gluten free thing. there is a small part that has the sill yak disease and can't eat gluten at all. others say i don't eat gluten. there is no health reason. it is all in their head. >> everyone has a gluten reaction. my kids' schools are nut free. you can't bring in anything, you can't bring -- remember the great cookies that looked like a peanut? you could get suspended. >> i have a half swedish daughter named gluten. >> does this make you not wpt to children -- not want to have children because they are pains? >> they would be spartan children and they would be fine. >> i think half the problem is it is too quake to make people to the doctor. my mother never took me to the doctor. i have the immune system of a tank. i had swine flu and didn't
12:40 am
need prescription medicine. they tested me and quarantined me in college. >> you did get swine flu. >> that was the only thing in years. >> i would say that mine is better. i never had swine flu. >> both of your i will legitimate daughters have food allergies. >> have you two daughters and they suffer from the dread condition. >> as it turns out it was shingles. i don't know why it was food related. i should take them to the doctor. that's on my to do list. there is something going on here. when i was a kid the one kid you had to be leery of was with lice. and now it is the one with the plantar's peanuts. i don't know if we are pumping in weirder things in our food this is absolutely a new development. >> is it the baby 4thof july law? >> i don't think it is
12:41 am
anything weird but maybe it has something to do with the pesticides. >> we have fewer pesticides. joy we have more hormones in the meat. >> there are fewer pesticides because we have fewer gmo foods. >> i don't think it is anything weird. i think it is the fluoride in the water. >> i was the first generation to get the water. i never had cavities. >> andy, you grim massed that the shame is the parents are paying a quarter of the cost. it is coming down on the backs of all of us. if your kid is insensitive to nuts or whatever, you have to pay for. it. >> the good thing is obamacare will change all of that. >> i'm sure it will. that's a sad day in america. time to take a break. now this is the part of the show where greg promotes the book of his. instead i will promote my comedy cd. it is called "impossible" get
12:45 am
would you use an app to order a mcwrap? well, in an attempt to make it easier for americans to get their big mac on, mcdonalds is developing an app that will let customers order and pay for their food right over their phones. the app is currently being tested in salt lake city and austin, texas. it lets those lucky bastards pick up the food in the restaurant or curbside or using the drive through. drive-thru. one researcher, an actual job, says it will appeal to millenials and teenagers, aka, awful people. meanwhile, my healthy restaurant for lemurs is really taking off.
12:46 am
>> since working on the show my hate for monkeys -- are they monkeys? >> lemurs are a kind of monkey. >> monkey and all monkey related things. they are creeping me out. back to the mcdonalds idea is it a great idea or great idea? >> normally i love anything related to mcdonalds. any innovation that brings mcdonalds closer to my face, i'm all about it. >> you are on the road and love the drive-thru at mcdone -- mcdonalds drive-thru? >> it is quick enough. mcdonalds has a short shelf life. if you order it ahead of time, like 2 minutes before your fries are past prime. >> that's a good point. >> that's why sometimes i order special things, weird things so thisy have to make it up for me. >> no salt on the fries and they make you new ones. >> we shouldn't reveal that and so now everybody will do it and it will ruin our
12:47 am
fast-food secret. >> you don't like the idea of the time constraint? >> the time constraint is why i wouldn't use it, but i am open to other things that would get mcdonalds to me quicker like opening a mcdonalds mcdonalds in my living room or crawlspace. >> is this proof that the future is now -- that's a phrase i made up. >> i like that phrase. >> the future is now. >> i think it is proof the future is now and i think it is proof the future is awesome because anything that minimizes how much i have to talk to other people -- >> that's it! >> it is a step toward utopia. >> it is the an gemming we don't -- it is the angle we don't like talking to people. but we also don't like talk together speaker. >> all you have to do is go to the mcdonalds and stand outside and then order it. then you don't have the time problem. >> and they will bring it out to you? >> even if you have to go inside you don't have to give your order. >> so just don't submit it?
12:48 am
i like that. >> did you see that movie "super size me" wasn't that a dumb movie? >> i didn't see it. i didn't see it so it is terrible. >> he ate mcdonalds for 40 days and it will make anyone feel sick. >> i don't like big macs at all. i'm sorry. it is not a thing i like. but i love any app at all where i do not calling and having to place an order over the phone. i will change restaurants if i can't order on seemless because, one, i am lazy and two i have to wait for the food and i don't want to talk to someone on the phone. and i would just hand you my card and be like thanks a and leave. >> in this app, you know they will give you coupons and stuff for those free french fries you love so much. >> you do love them. >> app or no app, kahn not afford mcdonalds. should you even comment on the story, bill? >> yes. i don't understand this.
12:49 am
it is not possible for mcdonalds to be quicker than it is. the only other step is for them to imaginely make the food materialize and diarrhea in your toilet. that is only way it could ever be quicker. >> that's terrible. >> that's your future right there. >> one thing that will be convenient is you don't have to carry your cash. >> that's good. you prepay on the app. >> and it cuts down interaction with people. look at the drive through. if the line is more than four cars, park and walk in. you will get your food quicker. when you come out you wait for them. look, i am a walker and i beat you. >> you ruined everything. >> you have a comment on the show? e-mail us. do you have a video of your animal doing anything? click on submit a video and we might use it. stay right there. we have one final topic to chat about. we will be back with three minutes and 40 seconds. [ maragno ] if the car was invented today,
12:51 am
it would run on the most affordable energy source available. it would charge overnight. every morning, you'd wake up with a full tank, ready to go. if the car was invented today, it would be the 100% electric nissan leaf. with over 200 million gas-free miles driven and automatic hov lane access, the question isn't "why electric?" it's "why gas?"
12:52 am
12:53 am
12:54 am
some lady. it was for refusing to stop playing songs boy the eagles. she lost her cool after her roommate whom she used to date, ignored her pleas and told her to shut up. the 54-year-old grabbed a bread knife and stabbed him in the arm, hand and elbow. the unidentified roommate and his brother wrestled the weapon from her, but she went and got another. according to the report all were intoxicated. >> no. >> what? >> check please. >> so many questions. remi, did she overreact or what? >> the story is wrong. i read in the daily news it was an ar-15. >> drunk people. >> it had a bay yawn net attached. >> ellison, do you even know who eagles are? the eagles? >> not the bird. >> if i am correct, it is the name of the band is eagles and
12:55 am
not the eagle. >> i think it is the eagles. >> here we go. where is andy when we need him? >> i challenged you. it is the eagle. >> how do you know? you are 15 years old. >> it is past your bedtime. >> andy, please solve this debate. tell me, which song if played on repeat, eagles or no eagles would you stab someone over? >> any song by the black eyed peas or maroon 5 and you wouldn't even have to play it on repeat. the one time. ♪ tonight is gonna bow a good night ♪ you have to admit it gets the party started. >> when i first heard the story i assumed it was teenagers or college kids. she is 54 years old. how do you stab somebody over music? >> it is not that shocking in south carolina. i can say this as somebody who went to college in south carolina. >> it must have brought up memories. she is in that pocket.
12:56 am
>> look at her. ♪ you have to come that your senses ♪ >> is this a cautionary tale of learning to live in harmony with your ex? >> that's the part of the media is glossing over. this is her ex-boyfriend so maybe there was something going on besides the happenings of don henley. >> is it the eagles or the intoxication of all of them and she was a former lover who still lives with him. >> i will see you your former lover. do not with anyone namedbader. at some point she will stab you. >> her nickname is darth. >> it is a sad thing. >> there were a lot of hot songs in the 70s. remember that song about the valley people -- the valley people and the mountain people and they met in the middle and fought over a chest and inside the chest it said peace on
12:57 am
1:00 am
balanced and unafraid. the o'reilly factor son tonight. >> the ar 16 thats with a used today, you have seen the damage that this weapon can do. >> how does a guy walk into a facility like that with an ar-15, a double-barreled shotgun and a handgun. >> bill: once again, the media attacking the right to bare arms and using mass murder to do so. this time the liberal press got it very wrong. we will show you what happened. >> what is the worst thing you have heard your mommy say? >> can i say it? >> yes. >> [bleep]. >> a new study says that american women are far more aggressive than american men when put under strain. uh-oh. we will talk about it with kirsten powers. >> arizona is abandoning the run. no huddle throw and
180 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=821072856)