think about this. i mean, really? responsibility. responsibility. we're going to explore this a lot more tonight and apparently from the e-mails i should go over to apologize to stuart varney tonight. i have no intention of doing so. >> hello, everyone. i'm eric bolling along with andrea tan tears along with greg gutfe gutfeld, dana perino and bob beckel in new york city. hello, this is "the five." first, president obama rammed through his signature health care law. next he strong-armed the supreme court, which he stacked with liberals to call obamacare a tax, and then the president, 28 times, personally changed or delayed the law to suit his needs and presumably his political pals, 28 times without consulting congress. some of us on the right are downright the president acting more like king obama than the elected official he is. here's kraut hammer. >> remember how democrats were

complaining that when republicans were trying to overturn obamacare it was somehow unpatriotic because it was then an attack on the law of the land. this law of the land doesn't even exist. it exists in obama's head. it's whatever he thinks he wakes up in the morning and decides what the law is going to be. >> well, president obama's use of the executive order, executive privilege, whatever, is getting so egregious even liberal professors are pushing back. >> i think that many people will look back at this period in history and see nothing but confusion as to why people remained so silent when the president asserted these types of unilateral actions. you have a president who is claiming the right to basically rewrite or ignore or negate federal laws. that's a very dangerous thing. >> bob, your guy thinks he can do whatever the heck he wants. >> well, first of all, let me give you a few facts here. he did not stack the supreme court with liberals. it's a conservative court, and it has been the last 15 years.

secondly, he did not ram this bill through congress. he got enough votes to win in congress, so not ramming it through, so the idea that somehow you say he stacked the supreme court, that may be the most laughable thing -- >> did he appoint two and both were very liberal in. >> still a 5-4 court. >> i understand. maybe it's 5-4, but go ahead. >> i think charlie is right, right on the edge on a lot of these things and the way to answer this is go to court. people will look back on this period of history. why not look back and say take it to the court and see what the supreme court says. >> turley says a constitutional professor and lawyer thinks it's dangerous. >> the problem, what's interesting, the obamacare defense mirrors that of war. no matter how bad it gets, you have to stick with it. you can't bail out. instead of patriotism it's obamaism because if you decide you dissent, then people look at

you in the same way they would look at somebody who is not being patriotic, and the media that is there alongside cheering it along. like that corrupt cop in a movie where a victim always goes to the corrupt cop and says i've been mugged and just laughs. that's the media. if you complain about these things, the media just laughs and goes so what? they are the mocking corrupt bag of slime that laughs whenever you point out the lies. >> well, still doesn't mean they can't go to court. >> i wasn't answering that question. >> bob, you're right. you're 100% right. it went from bill to law and he won. the problem, is dana, as we pointed out yesterday, 28 different times president obama has unilaterally, he's decided he wants to change a law. he can't do that. >> the supreme court gave the president the go ahead to implement the law, but it's the implementation of the law that has showed that government doesn't do a good a job as they would think they would like to. jonathan turley, serious professor, used to really complain about the concerns about too much power in the

executive during the bush administration. i think it's refreshing to see it now, too, because he's not so much interested in defending the president himself. he's talking about the presidency as a whole, as an office. what he's saying is in the future it will be much more difficult for any president to resist doing this type of unilateral action without the -- without working with congress if somebody doesn't raise red flags right now. the concern that turley is explaining is not just about one particular policy with president obama. it's a concern about the strength of the presidency going forward. >> charles krauthammer said right there and says president obama wakes up and decides what he wants to do and does it. he doesn't consult congress. if we don't consult congress, why do we need a congress and senate, and why do we elect these people? >> quite a bit odd coming from a serb constitutional professor. he is lawless. he shows he has no regard for the first amendment, fourth amendment, separation of powers, checks and balances,

unilaterally decides what he'll do with obamacare, sometimes immigration and when it comes to executing americans abroad. the reason he's so bold is because of the media. they never checked him. they never were the check and balance that they were supposed to be, and my fear, i know, bob, you say that go to court. >> yes. that's an idea. >> my fear is that if he does get sued, let's say, and the court comes down against the president, will the president ignore a court order? >> no. >> what happens then, and i do think we are seeing the beginning of a constitutional crisis, request not we're in the midst of a full-fledge constitutional crisis, and i do agree that it is the precedent that is the most important thing. what if someone even far more radical than president barack obama comes in and the precedent has been set that checks and balances mean nothing and they can do whatever they want. >> you think the president of the united states is going to ignore the supreme court. that would be a constitutional crisis. >> i would not -- >> that's not going to happen. >> i would not put anything past -- >> you're making him into a bigg bigger, bigger ogre, just

ridiculous. this guy has you guys consumed. >> i don't know, bob. >> obama is consuming your mind. >> let's move on. remember when the president claimed he had absolutely no idea that his healthcare.gov website wasn't ready to go live october 1st. if you don't remember, here's a refresher. >> on the website i was not informed directly that the website would not be working the way it was supposed to. had i been informed i wouldn't be going out saying, boy, this is going to be great. >> wow. interesting, because according to the hill we found out today they obtained documents, requested documents 18 times he met with kathleen sebelius and met with her on the phone, how did he not know? >> i have a feeling because possibly she didn't know the extent of how bad the website was going to be, or that she didn't tell him. i don't think -- i'm going to say -- i don't think the president is lying. some people are trying to suggest that he lied about it, that he didn't know the extent

of it. i can imagine being in the oval office, yes, sir, we have challenges and we're working on them and we should be ready to go by october 1st. the fact that they weren't completely honest either with her and then ultimately with the president is a concern for which no one has actually been held accountable. >> we've talked about this before. a couple other things that the president claimed he didn't know about. put this ring around him, placeable deniability ring around him. talked to the people and advisers but never physically spoken to the president. 18 different occurrences meeting with the president, seeing him and speaking to him. do you believe there's any way he didn't know that site wasn't ready, and if that's true should she be fired in. >> she definitely should be fired, but that would be a reward. i actually think she wants to be fired, but there's a growing sense, and if you read staffers in the white house on background, you get the sense that they don't like to deliver bad news to president obama. he doesn't like bad news, and dana makes a really good point. i can't imagine going into my former boston, a governor or a senator and saying this thing is

a total disaster and then they will go and say fix, it andrea, it's on your head. i think they probably did keep a lot of it from him to cover their own behinds. however, i cannot believe that kathleen sebelius had no idea. i am not buying that for one second. >> can i just go back to dana one second. i'll get you guys in. there was a piece about three months ago where there were two reporters. i believe it was the "washington post," i can't remember their names, but they said that the advisers, president obama's advisers, were made aware that that site was nowhere near ready. why didn't the advisers tell him had. >> that was the question of what is the information flow like to the president, and is it so broken that they don't tell him or were they not told themselves or did they think the media would give him a pass on it? remember when president obama went to the white house correspondents dinner and said everything would be smooth sailing and he made the joke because you all voted for me. not so much of a joke. everybody laughed because they knew that it was true and i

think the softness that the media has treated him with leading up to the website failures led to probably less than satisfying answers given to the president. >> greg, someone failed. either president obama failed, kathleen sebelius failed, the advisers. where does the buck stop? >> well, let's -- i don't know if it's president obama's fault because, let's face it, with sebelius, she's not the sharpest quill on the porcupine. i have a feeling she went to the white house 18 times, but she didn't know that it was the white house. she thought it was an ethan allen furniture outlet, and she never actually ran into president obama. this is the way i see this. the administration and the media, which is its enabler has no patience for the majority of americans, so in that case every act and law is a serb certain kind of retribution for past sins so in a sense we are at the mercy of vengeful cultists who are determine to gut their mother and father for not being nice to them when they were kids. >> you've got to be in a white house and work in a white house,

i think the two of us here in any event. i very rarely remember a cabinet secretary telling the president bad news. >> what? >> i forget you worked for carter. >> you tell me how many people stood up to bush? >> stood up, absolutely. what do you think it was like to have to tell him the banks were failing you? think hank paulsen and ben bernanke didn't need to call him up? why did you think general petraeus comes back and has to tell the president the war is failing, we have to do something to change it. what did the president do, fixed it. i told him bad news every day. >> by and large cabinet secretaries do not. leaving that aside. you have no evidence that sebelius in these meetings -- first of all -- >> someone had to know, bob. >> i'm sure somebody knew. i'm not trying to excuse her. first of all, these meetings, a lot were meetings with health care groups and meetings she was there. >> and the irs. >> this is his signature legislation. kicking off. the day was supposed to kick off it wasn't ready.

>> my guess -- >> if the boss had something going, a brand new show ready to go and you knew something was going to go wrong with the show, wouldn't you tell the boss? >> no. >> would you? >> yeah, i would. that's just me. we want to get your health care numbers, can we do it in a second? >> they are so good i don't want to bring a pall over your anti-obamaism. >> we'll do it after the next spot. how will all the politics the president is playing with our lives play out in the mid-term elections? i have an idea, but let's listen from rush. >> i fully expect the 2014 mid-terms to be a wave election like 2010. i -- i think the people in this country are going to sweep democrats out of office every chance they get, every opportunity they get. >> all right. can i ask a question. is there anybody besides -- that we have videotape of besides rush limbaugh and charles krauthammer? >> he's got 17 million people

who listen to him daley. >> 17 million right wingers. >> no, they are right wingers. he think it's going to be a wave election. doesn't know anything about elections, number one. number two, a wave election would mean you're going to knock out somewhere between 15% and 20% in the house and 10% in the senate, i don't think that's going to happen. excuse me, 20% in the senate. >> i somewhat agree with bob. i don't think it's going to be a wave, as rush is talking about. if he's trying republicans to get out and vote it's a great strategy to do so. i joke that republicans never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity, so fingers crossed on this one. do i think it's going to be a wave? maybe not. i think obamacare is going to be an important issue, but on a lot of this stuff i feel like people aren't paying attention or they don't care and if the media is not reporting it then they don't care and one last point on the last block, maybe people didn't pell president obama how bad the website was because the irs scandal had just happened, so this was on the heels of that. no one got fired, so why stick your neck out if you're going to keep your job anyway? might as we will not say

anything. who cares. >> quick thoughts on this one, guys? >> rush could be right, as long as the republicans do not fall into traps and say stupid things. find normal candidates, no war locks, mad doctor, two-headed giraffes and run on -- >> impossible. >> run on what makes america work, because people sense a decline. they are hungering for renewal. you've got to show them how the current administration has undermined all the principles that has made america great. it's a very simple straightforward thing. that's all you've got to do, and you'll probably win. it's morning again basically. >> dana, maybe not a technical definition of bob's definition of a wave. wouldn't winning the senate and keeping the house be a wave? >> in my opinion we don't need a wave election. republicans should really trying to be winning back the senate, and i think mechanically they are better poised to do that in 2014 than they were in the last several elections, partly because they have put full-time

workers on the ground in all of those key swing states and just the way that the calendar falls and the way the states are this year, the republicans are in very good position, but it's not -- it won't be easy so it's going to be really fun to tune into "the five" every day and watch bob's head explode. >> directly ahead -- >> i wadirectly ahead, should america be a land of income equality or income opportunity? chris christie weighs in on that one next on "the five." ♪

♪ ♪ (bag shaking) (vo) bring the thrill the catch... now with new shrimp flavor.en. friskies. feed the senses. [ male announcer ] to truck guys, the truck is everything. and when you put them in charge of making an unbeable truck,

good things happen. this is the ram 1500. the 2014 motor trend truck of the year. ♪ and first ever back-to-back champion. guts. glory. ram.

income inequality has become the battle cry for democrats this election season as they search for a distraction from the ongoing obamacare mess. governor chris christie, a potential candidate for the 2016 gop presidential nomination, addressed this looming fight drawing a definitive line between the republican and democratic positions on the issue. >> i grew up in an american that

said life isn't fair, but opportunity is. i don't think the american people want income equality. what they want is income opportunity. that's the spirit of this country. how do i get a little more? think that the problem we have is an opportunity gap, not an income equality gap. one of the big discussions and conversations over the course of the next two years in national politics is going to be do you want mediocrity, or do you want greatness in. >> mediocrity or greatness? dana, the "wall street journal's" daniel henninger wrote a piece that the left will never support the solution to income inequality, so if the problem is we have people who are poor and we need to lift them up, and isn't the solution, and you talk about this a lot, education, and they have put bullseyes squarely on charter schools and private schools that are giving kids education to prevent them from ever seeing poverty? >> dan henninger writes every thursday in the "wall street

journal" and i wake up and i know i'll see henninger and karl rove on thursday as well. i always think henninger is saying things in his columns that people will eventually start talking about around two months because he just is not afraid to hit the nail on the head. this issue is about whether or not somebody like the new mayor of new york will take on the school -- the unions in the schools and all of these places where you have persistent poverty over decades. it's really the thing that can only -- that's the only thing that could change the income inequality gap in the long run. there might be things you can do to tinker around the edges here and there, make people feel a little bit better but the answer really is the schools and revitalizing the schools, and the question is will the democrats really stand up and do that, and he surmises that the answer is no. >> eric, isn't it because they don't want the solution because stirring up income inequality stirs up anger and resentment

and they can use that for police call purposes? >> it's the blame game, divide and conquer, class warfare argument where you have, look, the top 1% are making so much more and you're not doing a better and there's a problem so we need to tax you more so we can give you more stuff. the problem is over 50 years that we're kind of keeping our eye on povertyica and taxation and redistribution of wealth, it's not working. poverty continues to go up. we continue to take more from the earners and give it to the people who are in need, and it doesn't inspire. it doesn't provoke people to go out and get a job. what christie is saying, he had a great example in that speech. he said in america if you offered people the same income for the next -- for the rest of their life, most americans would say no because i think i can do better and i'll continue to strive to do better. he hits the nail on the head but income equality says everyone makes the same thing, in a perfect vacuum everyone would make the same thing for the rest of their lives. that's not america. >> sounds really boring, take

the same vacations, drive the same cars, cookie cutters. sounds pretty bad for the economy. what's wrong with a guy living on a street making say $40,000, $50,000 a year and someone making $10 million a year a couple doors down, why is that such a problem? >> if you ask the left what can be done about income, it's like asking a python what can be done about a mouse. inequality is the next step in coercion. historically this is how it's done. you identify an issue, in this case income inequality. you create the conflict and stress urgency. you nominate yourself as the solution and then you watch people suffer and die and then it's rinse and repeat. first you had, bob, the left say your health care wasn't good enough so they took it from you. then they said your job wasn't good enough so they took the 2 million jobs, so now they are saying your income, your income isn't good which that value they want to ascribe, as you say. this person is making too much.

whether you control that income or not does no good for the person making less. that's the next step in leveling the society under their coercive thumb. >> they are essentially picking pockets, bob, like -- almost like poverty pimps, right, so if we can keep this going like the rat catcher wants to keep rats running around or else he wouldn't have a job, it seems like that's what they are trying to do here. >> i really don't know where to begin here. it's so phenomenal to listen to the four of you. first of all, do you really believe that liberals want to see people live in rat holes? we may have been wrong on a lot of things but we've tried hard. >> i'm sorry, bob. >> the top 1% of the 1%, you know how much money they gave in the political cycle in 2012, 14%? they bought themselves a government. they have done a good job with it in congress. >> they mostly gave to obama. >> can i finish what i'm saying. >> absolutely, no. >> i'm talking about the

congress. >> you're saying -- congressional races. >> that's not what you said initially. >> i'm sorry. >> you can't say something like that. >> 1% gave 40% of the congressional money. that is a lot of money. >> do you know that liberals tend to make more money than conservatives but conservatives give more money to charity? >> i do know they give more money to charity. one more thing to our jersey governor here, with all his various problems, i'm glad to see he's trying offense. equal opportunity. you tell me that kids graduating from scarsdale high school outside of new york in the very rich neighborhood, they have an equal opportunity with the black kids in harlem. >> but that's what we talked about, what are the democrats willing to do to change the fundamental problem which is the problem of urban school districts that don't graduate enough kids? >> and would i say the problem is jobs. >> public schools -- there's ground zero. >> what? >> because the only way you bring the bottom 20% out of

poverty is by education. >> give them all the vouchers they want. i'm all for vouchers, and i'm just telling you. >> you know what their answer is instead? busing. they are starting to bus. >> bob. >> if you knew the history of busing you can't say that statement. >> this is a real problem in america. they are taking children from one school district and busing them to the others. something that they did decades ago. it's a real problem. parents are concerned about it, and here's my point. it's a noble goal to take people out of port. no one is arguing that. the problem is none of these solutions are going to make people rich. putting them on medicaid doesn't make them rich. putting them on food stamp doesn't make them rich. it doesn't work. that's the point. >> busing almost ripped this country apart in the '60s and the '70s. >> they are doing it again. >> the idea that that is repeating itself. it's a reality and i'll send you plenty of articles after the show. >> i was bussed in denver, after third grade and fourth grade, after two years of being bussed into the school district what, did my parents finally do, they made the decision to movement

where did i end up going, to a suburban school that was pretty much all white, so it goes back to the point andrea made initially. are the democrats willing to do something about the fundamental problem of education? you might be for school choice but the president is not and neither is the mayor and that's why those kids are going to continue to have failing schools. >> i am for vouchers but i'm not for beating up union teachers who are the lion's share are very good. >> give the teachers better resources. >> they should get better resources, i agree with that. >> we'll continue this debate another time. but first country superstar billy ray cyrus is back and gives his daughter a run for her money in the twerking department. we'll show you the remake of the video that may make you a little achy and breaky. that's next on "the five." in the new new york, we don't back down. we only know one direction: up so we're up early. up late. thinking up game-changing ideas,

like this: dozens of tax free zones across new york state. move here. expand here. or start a new business here... and pay no taxes for 10 years. with new jobs, new opportunities and a new tax free plan. there's only one way for your business to go. up. find out if your business can qualify at start-upny.com ♪ ♪ where you think you're gonna go ♪ ♪ when your time's all gone? male annocer ] live a full life. the new lexus ct hybrid with an epa estimated 42 mpg. the further you go, the more intesting it ge. lease the 2014 ct 200h for $299 a month for 27 months. see your lexus dealer.

yeah. i heard about progressive's "name your price" tool? i guess you can tell them how much you want to pay and it gives you a range of options to choose from. huh? i'm looking at it right now. oh, yeah? yeah. what's the... guest room situation? the "name your price" tool, making the world a little more progressive.

they said it was impossible to make a song that's worse than "achy breaky heart." they were wrong. billy ray coronavirus does it again with a remake in rap of that old pile of crap. i say have your children leave the room, but maybe it's good to see evil just to know it exists and we blurred out most of it. ♪ the only thing i'm asking you to do ♪ ♪ don't break my heart, my achy breaky heart ♪ ♪ if you break my heart, my achy breaky heart ♪ >> i guess his daughter rubbed off on him but if you can't beat them, join him, right, popz? ♪ got everybody wondering who i am ♪ ♪ miley keeps twerking >> the apple apparently doesn't fall far from the tree when the tree is lying in the gutter. it's amazing that a person with the ability to do anything in life chooses this.

this makes miley's twerky seem shakespea shakespearean. ♪ ♪ my achy breaky heart >> cultural decline is depressing, whether in the form of the manufactured shock of his daughter or the sad surrender to declay disguised as performance. art, like pornography may be hard to define, but this is so bad it makes porn look like art. don't get me wrong. rebellion can be beautiful, but crassness for the sake of prove vags diminishes all, including bystanders. intended to shock invites mockery and sadness and nausea. ♪ my achy breaky heart >> hooray for dad who celebrates the degradation of women in pop culture paraded as pieces of meat for the rabble to devour and perhaps its unbearable

horror is showing. we fight over problem mah, the nsa and taxes but here they there can be no dissent, black, white, rich, poor, old, we can all agree that this might be the worst thing ever. for that, billy, i thank you for bringing had country together under a singular belief that this really blows. you know what's hard about doing this,? we can't show you most of the video because it's all like naked ladies, and it's weird because it's like about his daughter. >> so gross. >> just strange. dana, i have a theory that this was an excuse for a casting call to get hot strippers. >> when you were showing the sound bites i was wondering, can you imagine if you got asked to be in that video and then you were like, yeah, that would be terrific. i don't understand why didn't anybody tell him that this would be terrible. also as a former country music deejay from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. in 1929, when "ache i breaky heart" was the number one song and i had to play it every hour on the hour for kccy fm

i've had that song in my head for every 20 years and now it will never end. >> that explains so many things, you wandering around. >> imagine trying to take your math test singing don't break my heart, my achy breaky heart. that was a better version that have. >> do you think this was his way of bonding with miley, if you can't beat her, join her? >> whatever happened to calling a shrink for daughter-father counseling. when the parent follows the child and the child is miley cyrus, that's bad. i felt bad for billy ray. in the words of wu tang, cash rotates around him. he's doing this for money. miley cyrus had her mtv performance and came out saying he was disappointed and did support her and then coming out he goes and does it to see how popular she go. >> pretty pathetic. >> could it be he's poking fun

at the hype around miley and we're taking it too far? >> what if i like the song? >> you like the video. >> no, i don't. >> you like that version? >> if you can play that song and don't play that video, because i agree with you, all your points on the cheap, using the naked ladies and all that stuff, and if you can play the song part of it. >> you like it? >> i do. is that terrible? >> you should make it your ring tone. i dare you. >> you might be right. >> what do you like about it? >> i actually love hip-hop. >> this is an insult to hip-hop. somewhere naughty by nature is having a nervous breakdown. >> daily beast takes them apart. >> how you could get that many creatins to show up and do one film at one time. those are the most disgusting, disgraceful, ugly, distorted and

disgusting humanity, one. two, the idea of merging hip-hop with country is a sin. this guy -- this guy who is deion warwick's -- well, buck this, buck says he wants to marry up in-hop with country western. are you kidding? go back and do hip-hop yourself. get all the naked girls and invite me over. >> if there's a lot of hip-hop making its way into country. >> florida-georgia line. >> very quickly. this was launched on larry king's showers, by the way, which i think tells you all you they'd to know. >> wow. >> if it were hot, they would release it somewhere else. >> unbelievable. >> all right. we've got to go. if you're single and looking for love on this valentine's day eve, what are the top cities to find someone, and what's the hourly rate? dana reveals the list when we come back. >> and i'll do the hourly rates.

[ thunder crashes ] [ female announcer ] some people like to pretend a flood could never happen to them. and that their homeowners insurance protects them. [ thunder crashes ] it doesn't. stop pretending. only flood insurance covers floods. ♪ visit floodsmart.gov/pretend to learn your risk.

with valentine's day tomorrow, many of you watching may be single and ready to mingle, but where in the u.s. do you have the best chances of finding true love? according to facebook the five cities where people have the highest rates of being in relationships are, colorado springs, followed by el paso, louisville, fort worth and san antonio. on the other hand, singles are least likely to couple up in big cities like san francisco, washington, new york, l.a. and atlanta. now i pitched this story, kind of worried that maybe you guys wouldn't be into it, but everybody in the commercial break, you like this topic. >> you looking at me? >> yeah. >> you said you have something funny. >> i have interesting points to make. san francisco is high on the list. has a much higher ratio of men to women, and the reason obviously is the city is sexist. women are leaving that city

because of the chauvinism. the bigger issue, the political issue, why is love important? because it protects against life's stress which affects your health. in a sense love is health care for your soul which makes it a right, and it's unfair that some people get more love than others. a stock broker may have a wife and a girlfriend, but there may be some poor union guy who has nothing, so it is time that we make it a right and redistribute love. go to the 1% of the beloved and force them to have relations with the 99%. >> there's a love and equality gap. >> bob has been redistributing love all over the country, since like what -- >> since -- >> bob, you don't like this list. >> i don't like it. i've been in every one of these places. greg is right. i'm looking at these cities and if i were you guys, see you do real well, go to colorado springs and see how well you do that. boys, you'll have a great time. el paso, texas, another place. now if you don't mind getting

married at 13 go to el paso, that's nice. >> what are you doing in. >> fort worth, that is a great place to go. the bottom five are the best places i've ever been to to pick up women, san francisco, washington, new york, los angeles, atlanta. >> this is for people looking for long-term relationships. >> what are they? >> andrea, ever know anybody who left new york city or washington, d.c. to go to another place to see if they could have better luck there? >> all the time. in new york city they have patty stanger from "the millionaire match-makers" bald bigger, better match guys. all of these cities which are more liberal, bob, more people and more liberal women willing to do away with conservative values. >> nothing wrong with it. >> guys have more options so they move on to the next one. if they don't get what they want for one night they move on around the corner. it's the conservative cities that are trending towards traditional relationships and moves women who leave these big cities do end up finding guys.

>> i hope that's true. eric, if you want to increase your odds of meeting somebody, because you're not necessarily going to meet somebody on an airplane. >> i'm married. >> i didn't know any of these things because i've been married for 17 years, but that kind of dated myself, would you leave? say you had never met adrian, would you have left new york city to find true love somewhere else? >> you can't seek it out. it's going to happen to you when you least expect it. in relationships, andrea is right. tends to be the southern cities, because they are more traditional the way they do things. they stay together. the northern bigger cities end up having a lot of different values, whatever. you want to find a section hot city, find one with great food, nice weather and great beautiful surroundings, miami, new orleans, san francisco and dallas. >> let me just say in defense of my man here, he's single and as rich as he is and as sort of good looking as he is in new york city, he could get in every block. >> this is for long-term

relationships. >> i should have briefed bob. >> let's not debrief him. >> don't worry. all the relentless coiled, snow and ice giving you a bad case of the winter blues? if so you could be suffering from what's called seasonal affective disorder. is it a real disorder or just general depression from the weather? let's debate next on "the five." she loves a lot of the same things you do. it's what you love about her. but your erectile dysfunction - that could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approvedo treat ed and symptoms obph, like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure.

do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, se immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or iyou have any allergic reactions such as rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a 30-tablet free trial.

on beautyrest and posturepedic. financing and save up to $500 get a sealy queen set for just $399. even get 3 years interest-free financing on tempur-pedic. but only through presidents' day at sleep train.

old man winter is wreaking havoc across the country. the deadly storm that pounded the south is barreling across the mid-atlantic and northeast dumping huge amounts of snow and ice in its path, and it's not over yet. eric, for example, got run over by a snowplow. some are claiming a severe bout of winter is leading to seasonal affective disorder or s.a.d. you said you were affected by this. >> yes, i have s.a.d. i self-diagnosed freshman year of college. i think it's real, absolutely

think it's real. to prove it's real go into any of the nutrition centers, the gncs, all the vitamin d is wiped out. people are trying to get the sunlight they don't naturally get in the spring and summertime. most people are just happier in warmer states and climates, and i'm not happy right now. >> good. i can tell you're not. >> greg, you're never happy. does it have anything to do with winter or summer? >> weather has no effect, but i do agree. it's an added challenge to your day so that just makes you more irritable, but i have a problem when people add disorder to thing, like you're sad so now it's a disorder. a disorder made for chat shows and always comes up at this time and there's products that are sold, the lights. >> you have one. >> you had a s.a.d. light. >> did it work? >> no. >> anyway. >> tell us about your s.a.d. loyalty. >> the problem of an affluent society. >> the sun was up in the winter in england? >> northern england when i lived there, the sun, what i remember, it would rise around 9:30, 9:45

in the morning and be dark by 3:00, so the thing is i've decided that this is actually mind over matter and that it's natural in the winter to want to hibernate, sleep. it's what -- we're meant to just chill out. can't be happy and up all the time when it's a bright beautiful sunny day. the most important thing you can do is exercise. >> there you go. >> but it's hard to go out and walk and you've got to get a dvd like jane fonda or something. >> bad day with snowplows plowing you over. >> snow blower dumped a pile of snow on me. >> i've been getting up at 3:00 in the morning to try to beat the storms. i'm sick of it. shoveling t-wolf inches of global warming off my driveway for the fifth time this year. compilation of everything, you know, less light, more difficult to get through a day, you know, vitamin d. i think it's for real. >> let me tell you something. i sit here as a former patient of dr. norm aean rosenthal who

created s.a.d. i went to him for about a year because i had the most difficult time to stop drinking, maintain your sobriety, my first early years of sobriety was the winter and i went to see him because he said there's a kick on you because you were enclosed, most places you'd go to get a drink and get out of it and i was very taken with it. he's exactly right. felt much more likely to drink in the winter than any other time. >> now you just watch tv. >> any type of weather is an excuse for drinking. it's sunny. we've got to go out. it's a great day to drink and it's freezing out. got to go to the bar with the fireplace and get wasted. never mind. >> it's normal out. >> and s.a.d. isn't the right acronym either because there's so much snow. it shouldn't be called s.a.d., it should be called p.i.s.s.e.d.

>> okay. one more thing is up next. (meow mix jingle)

right on cue. it's more than just a meal, it's meow mix mealtime. with wholesome ingredients and irresistible taste, it's the only one cats ask for by name. here in philadelphia you can access a philly cheesesteak anytime, day or night. just like you can access geico anytime, day or night. there is only one way to celebrate this unique similarity. witness the cheesesteak shuffle. ♪ cheesesteak, cheesesteak ♪ ♪ it's the cheesesteak shuffle! huh! ♪ ♪ every day, all day, cheesesteak, cheesesteak! ♪ ♪ every night, all night cheesesteak, cheesesteak! ♪ ♪ 9 a.m. cheesesteak! ♪ 2 p.m. cheesesteak! ♪ 4 a.m. cheesesteak! ♪ any time (ruh!) >>geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance.

all righty. time for one more thing and andrea kicks it off. >> this is a very scientific edition of "the five" and to continue with that there's new research out that shows that men officially have larger brains than women, larger just in size.

it doesn't mean you're smarter, eric bolling, obviously. >> size matters. >> so if you look at the picture right there, you can see the red area is where men are predominantly stronger. red is women, and plus is where men are predominantly stronger, and this contributes to not just health issues, but look at how different the brains are. women strive for equality but they are not the same people and, of course, women are more emotional and all this stuff. very fascinating to see the look at the differences between men and women. >> which one was bigger again? >> can't remember. >> in size. >> okay. >> doesn't mean smarter. >> bob, you're up. difference between men and women, men are from mars, venus is from women, good god i right. i want to give a shout-out to the people who go out there in the middle of the night to try to get us shoveled out, people in snow plows, take ambulances around, police, fire fighters who do it. all those people, not only do they do that, thank you for what

you do and not yell at you and also keep in mind these are all government employees. >> yeah, very good. >> well done, bob. agreed, by the way. >> dana, you're up. stage manager goes oh, god. >> that was the brest. okay. i wanted to -- i'll do a shout-out which is a fan phrase, i went to a debate held in new york city on the upper west side. it was really good. oxford style debate started by the rosenkrantz series. the topic last night was snowden was justified, and if you looked down below on the screen there, intelligen intelligencesquaredu.s.org. they have done okuma and have one upcoming on russia and a really good way to keep informed, and i appreciate them hosting it. >> good group. greg, you're up. >> haven't done a band phrase in a while. today's word.

february. why do we have a month where we have that stupid "r" in there. you need to explain it to kids why you don't pronounce the "r" and why the word is change that had way. change the name from february to boringuary. where can we get the book? >> amazon.com. >> you'll be hearing a lot about that. >> okay. snap chat. okay. i'm on snap charkts love the a. have a problem, every time you want to snap charkts everyone in the list you have to press every single name. if you have 4,000, 5,000. press that button, get a snap chat all and you're afraid of someone snap chatting everyone when they are drunk, but maybe you just figure out a way to get around there. >> eb 2016 is begging you snap chat. >> i'll snap chat a couple of

pictures from behind the scenes. don't forget to set your dvrs. back here again tomorrow. "special report" on deck. a winter storm that iced over the south dumped blankets of snow in the northeast, endangering lives, cutting off power and making travel a nightmare. this is "special report." good evening. i'm shannon breen in for bret baier. we begin with the weather. if you live in the eastern half. country, yours is probably bad. entire communities are paralyzed. hundreds of thousands of customers are without power, and at least 20 people have died. senior correspondent rick levanthal begins our coverage tonight from philadelphia. >> reporter: maurice is working overtime shoveling snow in the worst winter