this: what is a better way to determine who is eligible for extension on obamacare honor system or government? up next the o'reilly factor. tonight on "red eye." >> coming up on "red eye" how many men does it take to stop the belgian air force? the exclusive interview with the man who is keeping the fleet grounded. and how is andy levy to the success of "red eye"? >> i hillary pete this again. he deserves all of the credit. >> and how many nudists can you fit in a single swimming pool? our panel debates the question that never should have been asked in the first place next. none of these stories are on "red eye" tonight. >> i am andy levy filling in for greg gutfeld. take that anyway you want. let's welcome our guests. i am here with the woman who

cuts ellis son's hair, it is ellison's barber. sometimes she can't pronounce her own name, although it is usually after she sucked a bottle of wine dry or box of wine. and it is columnist and libertarian know it all michael money gnaw han. and tucker carlson "tokes and friends" --" fox and friends" co anchor. >> a block. the lede. that's the first story. hey, greg -- oh, hey, andy. i guess the booster seat has the night off. >> was it too meta to matter? stevenstephen colbert was caught and it lead to outrage. it is the subject of tonight's -- >> is this racist? >> on thursday evening, the official at colbert report

account wrote i am willing to show asian communities i care by introducing the ching-chong ding dong dictionary. they secured the attempt to play indicate the native american community. >> this move by dan snyder inspares me. my show has frequently come under attack for having a so-called offensive mascot. my beloved charkt a ter -- character ching-chong ding dong. i ruv tea. it is so good for you. you are so pretty americans. you come here. i no need no sugar when you around. come on i give you ride to bangkok. offensive or not? not. you chingchong is part of the unique heritage of the colbert nation that cannot change. but i am willing to show the asian community i care by introducing the ching-chong

ding dong foundation to or orientals or whatever. >> in case you didn't figure it out colbert plays an ignorant charkt a ter on his show. the tweet out of context lead to calls for his show to be canceled. tucker, you were saying in the green womb you wholeheartedly -- green room you wholeheartedly asked for it to be canceled. >> i thought it was real. i think the jokes are the conservatives are bigots. i can't decide who to dislike more, him or the professional grievance monger, the 24-year-old twitter chick who tried to get them both. of course he shouldn't be fired. it is a one-joke show. >> she will be thrilled to be called a twitter chick. >> i don't know what else she s. she doesn't have a job. >> twitter woman? >> chick. >> ellison, as the only asian-american on the panel, are you offended?

>> very. and i do think they should can sell the show -- no. it was accidentally racist. taken out of context it was sounding bad, but they explained what it was from. the idea that the show should be canceled is absurd. >> michael, is there a lesson that twitter is a sinkhole filled with silly, silly people. you have like a bazillion followers. twitter exists as a plant form and 140 characters. it was like a out of context. if i am looking at that, and if you know anything about stephen colbert you say he really hates asian people? maybe look at the comments. there was a link in it. click on the leng and see what -- on the link and see what it is about. what annoys me about it is it is not sanction him. it is not make him apologize which you have to do.

it is this modern life where they apologized for something they shouldn't have apologized for. it is to fire him. we went beyond apology. >> what is the context? the context was people who disagree with me are bigots. that's the point of it. that's always the point of it. anyone who is not on my side is a racist. i think it is every bit of stalinist as it is to get him fired. >> it is not racist. >> he is making the claim that the people who disagree are racist. it is a parity of those who disagree. it is the right wingers. it is the morons. it is the point he is making. >> and it doesn't read on twitter. >> it is okay to call them racist, but without the context? >> it is always okay to call conservatives racist. >> but there is a wonderful lesson. you have a number of people on

the left or the progressives or whatever you want to call them these days. seeing this instinct and maybe one would hope that they would understand that this is what happens and that there is no context. anything you say these days, if it is racism you can get a thousand retweets. you can get a salon.com article where the entire existence is racist. you can see people who is a big lefty and he has gone at -- he has been at war with them two times about this sort of stuff. sara silverman, the same thing. she made a joke on conan. you hear people understand that it is crazy. >> it is like a criticism, a self-criticism session within the weather. >> let me get you in on this. as people .ed out, colbert and comedy central apologized.

should they have? >> yeah, that's our world now. how did we offend people before twitter? i am curious. every week it is a different show on a different network and has done something wrong or host or something. probably the girl who works for comedy central and is in charge of the account has had some sort of punishment. there is all of this negativity. this is great for the show. now people are talking about a show and i'm sure more people are going to watch in the next week or so because of all of the buzz that surrounds him. people don't get fired anymore. the show isn't going to get can a seld. the apology needs to happen. the show will go on. >> you raise a good point. our ratings go up when you tweet racist stuff. our ratings definitely go up for a day or two. >> why the apology? >> that's what i don't understand.

>> they don't even pretend to misunderstand the tweet. >> if you are following the show and it was the show's handle that tweeted this, you should then understand the joke. >> there was a great article in "time". did you see that? did anybody see that? it was in "time" magazine. the whole point was the schtick of comedy is nobody as a group is that great. you should make fun of every group because that a is essentially why comedy exists is to mock every type of group. when you hold it to this absurd standard, you do a disservice to what comedy is supposed to be which is a check for everyone to be like, yeah, every group of you, somebody should call you out. and this one did sound bad when it was tweeted, but there has been an entire movement to take comedy much more serious than it should be. >> i think it gets back to something you said. to me it takes what i call willful stupidity to take what

colbert was saying to be basically the exact opposite. in other words they know exactly what you said. they know he is not being anti- asian. but it furthers their agenda and garners them attention to attack him. >> it is not righting a wrong. it is about flexing your muscles. as america's problems become deeper and more intractable and are basically impossible to think about, we look at the stupid like, you are being racist. who cares a? who cares? >> that's how humanity works. if you have an issue in your marriage and it is a deep seeded issue you nitpick at your friends. there is a bigger problem. >> there is like this industry of outrage and apology today. i saw that british airways apologized for having an advertisement in heathrow that said discover the indian ocean. people will be offended. they apologized.

>> seriously what is going on here? who is offended by this? who is assuaged by this? i don't understand. i am offended by this. what does that mean? i can't sleep at night if i saw this ad? what does it mean? >> people are looking to find personal significance in something that does not involve them at all. >> it it is the idea of christian contrition. i am sorry. >> it is the basis foraysism. >> we are japanese show guns leak bowing and going through the -- >> why do they have to be japanese shows? i want to end the subject by saying i feel for stephen colbert. it sucks when you take something people said and then it means the opposite of what you mean. >> are you as mad as i am? well, just wait until you find out why you are so mad.

>> the white house sends out a photo of president obama with his foot on his oval office desk. i am disgusted right now. >> commander-in-chief con chem few us withly put his foot on the oval office desk. desks are not for your feet, mr. president. >> you deserve it. it was the shot seen around the world. seen here trying to convince manti te'o she is real, i guess. she tweeted a selfie to drum up support for the ukraine. on-line outrage ensued, but saki defended the tweet saying the people of the ukraine are fighting to have their voices heard and the benefit of communicating over social media is it sends a direct message to the people that we are with them, support their fight, their voice and their future.

i'm sure they got that message. i'm sure they also got the message you are sad "how i met your mother" is over. >> mr. gorbachev, tear down this wall. >> oh yeah. ♪ here comes kool-aid ♪ here comes kool-aid it is gonna save the day. >> it can work. is this the definition of the least you can do? >> i think it is inappropriate. i wouldn't even say the least you can do. you had them put out a complete documented who were held in crimea and they sent a toe toe of you smiling -- a photo of you smiling and doing a thumbs up saying we're with you. i think technology is evolving where you have to use eecial -- social media and i don't

begrudge that. the smiling and the thumbs up is a situation where she is not a ran dam person. >> it leads to what strong foreign policy move is next? will they like them on facebook? >> i don't begrudge the media their children. that doesn't bother me. what bothers me is the lie. i think it would be ludicrous for us to get too deeply involved. what bothers me the most is the use of spoks for spokeswoman. spoks? it is knots -- i think it is the spokes. >> i like spoks better. it is like "star trek" jie. it is not only gender neutral, but it is dorky as hell. >> i think it is just an

abbreviation. >> whatever, old man. >> joanne, you are a pretend ukrainian. did the selfie make you feel good about the safety and security of your people? >> no. what it really showed was the difference between the haves and the have knots. it is like look at me. i am comfortable. i am in a good position. here i am with my technology and my sign. it is my nice suit you don't feel supported. actions speak louder than words. it is a display which is what we do best. >> are people making too big of a deal out of this? when you snap chatted nudes to the syrian rebels no one

complained. >> nobody except the syrian rebels. >> they just thought i was being modest. >> they couldn't figure out what was wrong with you. >> no, they told me to see a doctor. >> you got a lot of i'm sorry responses. >> i am benign. >> i can't get exercised about this, but nobody it paying attention and this is to your point is how many ukrainians are following her instagram feed? they are ukrainians that live in the bay bridge. it is a stunt for an american audience. it is like we are not going to do anything. we shouldn't be doing anything beyond the smos dash -- the most basic stuff. instead we are going to have a picture of this awful woman

with a selfie. the other thing i recent is the idea of social media. anyone over 45 talking about social media is like a magic thing. we are on social media. what does that mean? does it have an effect? >> that is what i like best about this picture. she made sure to put her twitter handle on it. ukrainians, i support you. follow back. >> let me know how you are feeling. >> i guess we don't have time for that next story. coming up, john travolta's marriage is a sham. have you seen the hair on kelly preston? first, who is the latest celebrity to get the hologram? i hope it is princess lea. no? you are watching fnc so stick

around.

do clingy pants have a chance? it is day 83 of -- >> war on leggings. >> an illinois middle school has ordered some girls to stop wearing leggings because they are too distracting for boys. in a letter the principal said there is no official ban, but rather, quote, if leggings are worn, a shirt, shorts or skirt must be over them -- worn over them and must be fingertip length. are rules about leggings a a stretch? writes rebecca rose, the problem is yet again another institution has decided it is easier to punish girls for what they wear because there is a chance someone from the opposite 6 may sexualize them.

i hear you, girl end from. speaking of injustices -- >> i am still trying to figure out how the quote make sense. if the school was worried about boys being distracted, sbt the a isn't the answer burkas? >> the answer is to segregate the sexes. they do that in afghanistan. >> or like an all boys school. >> look, i don't think -- the jesible clothes may have been really strange. i think they are right. the idea is if boys are being oaths and apes and attacking girls because they are wearing yoga pants, it is not the

girls wearing yoga pants' fault. is that a a controversial position? >> we will see if anybody disagrees with you. >> we are punishing boys by taking away the yoga pants. >> you are punishing america. >> this is the highest level of of -- yoga pants. we have gotten to this point and to go back, we will not go back. >> they are taking away our biggest tool which is to show off our body in tight clothing. we know you become puddy. no one wins. >> are you really sinister, robert -- aren't you? >> the villains are the boys who cooperate control themselves. >> they are the victims. >> well they ruined it for the rest of the boys. >> boys are animals. >> i saw you look surprised when they said they had to have something covering their fingertips.

that was a rule when i was in high school. >> what is that a? >> dress codes it has to be down to -- yours. >> what if you have short arms. >> i think there is an unjustness and unfairness. there are similar rules for boys, you can't have sag gee pants. >> you can't wear just a jock strap. >> everyone is surprised by the idea there are dress codes. it is not new. >> it is not the dress code that is the problem. it is the reasoning behind it. it should have been the girls need to wear something over their very tight pants because it is not professional. in the future when you go to get a job or you meet for future boyfriend's parents, you can't have your ass showing. you need to have it covered. >> the only reason you do dress codes in school and not have it be considered your first amendment right is if you can prove there is a reasonable hot that there will

be a distraction in the classroom. that's why they have to specify. but maybe they would make the same argument when it comes to boys wearing sag gee pants. saggy pants. >> let's not get trapped in the lie that yoga pants are not obscene. yoga pants are obscene. we shouldn't be like yoga pants are not obscene. yes they are. >> they make people look like they have better butts than they do. >> some of the cheap ones are then and you can see through them. >> the best thing about the show is you can find out some people's fetishes. >> it is not a fetish. >> you said it was the greatest thing. you didn't say just air travel. you went from fire to yoga pants. >> you can harass junior high kids in yoga pants.

>> a city of eight million people and four million are wearing yoga pants. >> and 3.5 should not be. >> should the boys in the school start wearing leggings as a protest of this some. >> that's a very good idea. >> come on, that would look stupid. >> you are like the martin scorsese. >> i prefer rosa parks. >> they say four million people in this city are wearing yoga pants. one of the moms at the school who said the schools who were disciplined were the girls more developed and the girls who weren't more developed they weren't saying anything. that's unfair. >> that's completely inprop proat. inappropriate. that's where you draw the line. but that's a problem you run into all the time when you are enforcing rules. some teachers choose to enforce it strongly.

that is wrong. >> are you letting the pretty girls get away -- >> no punishing the pretty girls. >> in this case they are saying they are singling out the girls that are too heavy or shouldn't bewaring them and it looks inappropriate. >> i got it the other impression. >> basically nobody knows what the story is about. >> maybe i support it and maybe i don't. >> tucker, we will send you to the school. then we will have you report back. >> i have kids this age and they don't wear yoga pants. they are obscene. >> they wear them on planes -- people wear pajamas all the time. >> put on a suit or tuxedo. >> clean up when you land, come on.

>> clink your champagne glass with the flight attendant. >> you can appreciate them for doing their job and getting you there. coming up, tom cruise is gay -- fully employed. he has a movie coming out june 6th. first, will apple add diversity to their emoji? i hope so. the nsa is getting set up with seeing a white one.

their emojis are causing frowning faces in real life. they lack color which raises the question -- >> is this racist? >> well, that small mom and pop company apple has pledged to issue a new more ethically diverse emoji after complaining about the pastiness from black celebrities and like miley cyrus. there are 58 hearts and smileys and one nude picture of tucker carlson. odd. ellison, apple didn't create the emoji's. they are based on a coding standard that apple has to adhere to so people on various platforms can see them. is it reasonable it is taking awhile? or are they straight up racist?

>> i find it best to just satisfy yes so i don't get in trouble. i use emoji's all the time. i love them. i have gone through and they do not have -- they have white characters so i understand if you want to send something that looks like you. kneeing that -- anything that spandz expands more emoji's is great. but if we are making requests you need to add dogs. it is cats, cats, cats. a camel with one hump and two humps and one dog and a stereo typical dog with a brown eye and a white. >> because they eat dogs. the people who make these -- i'm serious. >> is that racist? >> i am talking about computer coders at apple. they are totally unamerican. they are anti-dogs. >> they are probably american to be honest. >> not american is different from unamerican. they could be both.

>> can i talk about the emoji? >> yes. i am all for there being a more diverse emoji. we know what will happen here. racists will start using the emoji of color in really, really bad ways. >> i'm sure they could figure it out how to make it exist. i was reading a story from time frag. "time" magazine. it says i didn't know much about the emoji, but i did download it. there are two homosexual couples and i was told by the "new york times" that we are no longer to say that. even contained in the story there is something that saw parentally offensive. we can't say homosexual. >> i looked and there is -- it is true. int -- there was a guy with a

turbine and i was trying to figure out how i would use that a and it is clearly for something racist. >> how are you doing? how is it going with you sikh guy? i don't understand why these exist. maybe people wear turbins like the sikh who useemoji's. >> i loved it when you were a fact checker. >> i don't understand this at all. >> i understand wanting different skin tones. wouldn't you say -- i send emoji's of myself. i send a girl as me. >> there are a bunch of ethnicities. >> do you really end emoji's? and they are expressions of emotions? >> what is wrong with words?

>> here is what this is. it is the one man who is behind all of this is sherrod. he doesn't want a twitter army he wants an emoji army. >> interesting. >> you know what to say here. >> he was on yesterday and hosted. >> you were saying in the green room you will be boycotting the emoji. >> i just don't like sherrod. >> there is eggplant. >> maybe put your toys away while i try to run a show. >> i am trying to -- >> he is showing me a whole chain. >> there are photos on here. >> tucker, save this segment. >> i can't. i was wondering what an emoji is. >> says the guy who says i don't know what an emoji is. >> it is like america is slipping away.

>> you know what as uses them all the time? fox. according to a report amy winehouse who died of a drug overdose in 2011 may be coming back hologram form. he is planning to use the same technology that he used to bring 2pac. he said, quote, with an orchestra and her hologram she can take to the stage and tans can see her with the legend gary hits. is this a good idea or slimy person. >> they said she wants her art shares with the pratts. with the masses. it is a money making thing. >> this guy is in the middle of the circumstance show in vegas. he owns the pat at the present time and the ability to have

this device, but not apparently the license to use it. it is a tricky area. and it will get smoothed out and he can do what he wants. i don't know if tickets will sell. >> first i don't know if a guy named alkie is doing this. are people clamoring for an amy winehouse tour? >> i don't think they are. it was her father that was a former cabdriver that said, people really just want to listen to your music. really they want to expense the hole gram. you can't look the youtube videos? i don't know why we need a 3-d rendering -- i won't say that. it is disrespectful. >> because it is more owe bead

yept and re-- obedient and reliable. >> the only videos i have watched of her are her throwing up on stage. it was like the wide world of sports. >> you can have that too. it will be a whole puking section. >> it does what you tell it to do. >> what is if the hologram is wearing yoga pants. >> if you could bring anybody back to see them perform who would it be? >> hitler. >> probably not hitler. i think i can steb that. establish that. say what you want about hitler. he killed hitler. >> nobody else killed hitler. >> on his wedding day too. >> i remember the 2pac thing

at coach chel law. i watched it on youtube and if you are at that concert what artist could i have seen. if i am going to go out to a convert, i watch it on youtube otherwise i want to see a live performance. >> what about using the not for dead stars, but reunite guns n' roses or excellent acts like that. >> the flying burrito brothers. >> we are not far away from brooklyn being over run with holograms. >> i just found this out today. i am leaving brooklyn. >> good for you. >> it is time to take a break. when we return, a special

guest.

will success spended animation -- suspended animation lead to damnation. >> "red eye" debate 2014 live from the" red eye" debate center. >> welcome from the "red eye" debate at the" red eye debate center." scr alico vision, the only system you will ever need. tonight's "red eye debate" they will test suspended animation on human beings.

doctors replaced patients' blood with a cold say lynn solution allowing the body to exist without blood, breathing or brain activity. it gives the docs extra time to operate. the patient's body slow loo warls back to -- slowly warms back to life. first a quick word from our sponsor. >> if you own calico vision it gives you the arcade experience with the newest arcade games like donkey congress, junior, mr. doo, arcade controls like turbo, the roller controller and new super action sports and soon you will plug in adam, the calico vision computer module with keyboard and printer. the only system you will ever need. >> thank you. is this the beginning of some vanilla sky where rich people

like you put yourselves in suspended animation and the rest of us spend our lives as slaves monitoring the cap -- capsules? >> to eternity. i am not against it, but i am suspicious. one thing that makes me suspicious is their experiments on on pigs prove there is no cognitive impairment. >> how would you know that a? the pig was thespian. >> the pig read a very good case. >> michael, in the green room you were saying or screaming -- shouting. >> this time you have gone too far. >> i was bleeding out the eye. i think this is too far. libertarians who are obsessed with the singularity and they

want to do this which is the worst type of people. it will be like a bunch of fans. if there are ron paul fans watching, i am fine. i am all right if l is an unholy unholy -- it is an unholly. >> i like ron paul for the record. >> it is not about him. it is about his fans. and they are all freezing themselves right now in their basement. >> joanne, you said captain america the winter soldier comes out and steve rogers is alive today because he underwent success -- suspended animation in the 1940s you say it may be a pro motion motional discount -- proposal stunt. >> this can't actually happen. it is going to happen. they are testing it out. >> for the long periods of

time, i think this could be great for science and families who have loved ones who have suffered trauma. it is a symptom. it is like a cardiac arrest which is the symptom of a larger problem. they are treating the symptom by putting the saline into the body while they treat the bigger issue. and then they are putting the blood back in. in theory it is not great. i don't think ethically it is wrong in that instance. there is issues when it is for long periods of time. >> here is my thought. they are only using it for medical purposes, boring. i would put myself in suspended anna -- animation like i want the iphone 10. wake he up a day it comes out at midnight. you would never have to wait for anything.

you would go to sleep and wake up and the thing you want would be there. it is the perfect thing for our society. >> i feel like my real question, and i correct you. and this is weird if they are not getting permission. i think the real question is what do you do when you are on the other side? for the two hours you are floating around. >> you walk toward the light, but you are not really dead so you can crudes around. >> i feel like i am going to get some answers. i will be at the gates of jesus saying jesus! when i really come will i be getting in. >> i just want to ask if i will make it through or if i need a little -- >> just to see how you are doing.

>> can you imagine all of the books that are going to come out of these people who have seen the leet. this is what will happen. >> i want to use it to make sure my life is on the right track. you are leaving your question with we would be insane nerds. i just wanted to point that out. >> you wanted to use that to get video games. >> the difference city would only use it for good reasons. >> okay. >> got a comment on the show, e-mail us at red eye at fox news.com. got a video of your animal doing something go to fox news.com/red eye. click on submit a video and we may use it.

e block. last story. that's the last story. >> well, they are 16 and sponsored. yes, kids with large followings on youtube, twitter, vine and instagram are making big bucks through brand endorsements. these teen influencers get paid for each tweet or post like lauren geraldo who reportedly makes $2,000 for

every sponsored vine. said one adult, people feel closer to them because they show up in their feed and they hang on every word and everything they are wearing. which side of the apocalypse is this? >> the worst. i give them credit. i am happy these half wits are making money for posting pictures of themselves. are they out drinking coke and stuff? >> can you maybe read a story? >> did you not read? >> i will -- you don't pay me for this. the one thing that did uh send me -- >> these teens are making more money. >> the shocking thing is you are making more money than me? it is true. i think it is true. do you make 43, 44? i am shocked somebody pays you $32,000 to do this. >> there are 50 regulations about this type of the story.

why is it the ftc has teens doing lip balm ads. >> why are you against it? >> i am not against it. >> how many did you have as a kid? >> right. >> asian voice. >> we used to worry about people marketing to kids. and now kids are marketing. it is a whole other level of creepiness. >> pretty soon they will be reading. >> why are kids making consumer reports for the rest of us. they should not be charged with anything. >> i agree with that. my attitude is i don't want endorsements. if a hot celeb bra you tee is not endorsing it, i am not buying it.

>> everyone can be final muss. famous. there are sensations who have so many followers and are celebrities to their viewers. they are the ones who these company want endorsing their product or services. >> this girl aka princess lauren, keeps it whole son because she knows a lot of girls who follow her. >> i was distracted when i was doing a story because i got on vine and watched. hilarious. she is funny. it is vines of her scaring strangers in public places which is great fun. it is great. i'm with you though. 24 is an entrepreneurial spirit. if they can figure out a way to mark debt themselves -- >> what is vine? >> it is these little videos. >> it is like being on a panel with somebody in their 90s.

>> and they have a website. special thanks eiison and joanne and tucker and charleston. i'm andy levy, have a good weekend. don't do anything crazy. this.

tonight, at 8:00 p.m., we're going to start. hello, everyone. i'm andrea tantaros along with bob beckel, eric bolling, dana perino, and brian kilmeade. it's 5:00 in new york city, and this is "the five." last month, president obama made this declaration at the national prayer breakfast. >> promoting religious freedom is a key objective of u.s. foreign policy. and i'm proud that no nation on earth does more to stand up for the freedom of religion around the world than the u.s. of america. >> he said promoting religious freedom abroad is a priority for america. now, today, he is abroad in saudi arabia, and a lot of people including a bipartisan group of