tv The Five FOX News April 2, 2014 1:00am-2:01am PDT
1:00 am
hello, everyone. i'm dana perino along with andrea tantaros, bob beckel, eric bolling, and jesse waters. it's 5:00 in new york city, and this is "the five." this is a fox news alert. moments ago, president obama delivered a statement from the rose garden heralding his administration's latest figures on the affordable care act. >> last night, the first open enrollment period under this law came to an end. and despite several lost weeks out of the gates because of problems with the website, 7.1 million americans have now signed up for private insurance plans through these marketplaces. nobody remembers well those who stand in the way of america's progress or our peace.
1:01 am
that's what the affordable care actru represents. we didn't make a hard sell. we didn't have billions of dollars of commercials like some critics did. but what we said was, look for yourself. >> despite claiming that they have met their enrollment target, the administration still has not said how many people have paid or how many were previously uninsured. either way, charles krauthammer wondering if this was all worth the price. >> you have to ask yourself, the price we have paid, the estimate is $1 1 to 1.5 million of these people were uninsured before. the whole idea was insuring the uninsured. that's going to leave about 40 million uninsured. for that, we had to cancel 6 million policies? the price of this overturning, uprooting and revolutionizing a sixth of the economy and ecosystem and medical care is
1:02 am
staggering for 1.5 million uninsured. is that the way it should have been done. >> is there anybody else we could have gotten sound bites from besides charles krautham r krauthammer. >> i love charles. i think we ought to use him more than we have before. we just don't get enough of him, but obama can talk all he wants about 7.1 million people signing up, but the question is the promise kept? no, are premiums going down? no. are the uninsured now insured? absolutely not. did people keep their plans? no. did people keep their own doctors? no. they can talk about all they want about 7.1. >> but bob, it's the law of the land. obamacare is the law of the land. you might as well get over it because now, the gop put all its eggs in one basket and now in november, it's going to have egg on its face. >> we'll see. i think we're going to be crushed, democrats, because of the affordable care act or obamacare. >> all right, let's see what
1:03 am
eric has to say. >> happy april fool's day. i got it. it took me a little while. in fact, you know what i did this morning? i did the same thing on my facebook. obamacare is working, i love this, by the way, happy april fool's day. that was a cocky president. a guy who had a condescending tone to his voice. spiking the ball, end zone dance, all at once. we don't know how many have paid, how many young people, and that's the most important aspect, and by the way, there's still 40 million people -- 40 million people still uninsured at the end of the year, as charles points out, according to the cbo, but bottom line, premiums are going up. you're right when you're on her side. deductibles are going up, and the cost of the program is going to sky rocket. i wonder if he's going to have that same, arrogant, cocky attitude when we find out the real numbers. >> what do you think is going to happen in november, andrea? is this the hurdle they needed
1:04 am
to get over? >> no, if you look at recent polling, most democrats also are shying away from this, those running for re-election, and on the whole, the american people don't like this still. what i want to know is how come this white house couldn't get ahold of an exact number until today? the number was a mystery, but they can pinpoint it now, 7.1 million. they have it right down to the nose. by the way, if i was going to do an april fool's joke on bob, i was going to put the dark self-tanner in his makeup, but i didn't do it. i also think the important question that the media has to ask is, what is the net amount of people who actually signed up that didn't have insurance before? let's say it's about 2 million. okay, for that price, we could have gotten each of them their own personal doctor. and now you hear jay carney out there talking about, this is private insurance, this is private insurance. no, it's not. these insurance companies are being manipulated by a
1:05 am
ventriloquist dummy telling them what to charge and what plans to offer at what price. don't believe the latest spin on this private insurance line. >> what do you think? >> the white house is lying about the numbers. they're saying 7 million people signed up on the website that was broken for the last nine months. they really want us to believe this website is working enough where they can give us a legitimate number? the white house has lied about so many things, why wouldn't they lie about this? they lied about benghazi, about irs corruption, they lied about not spying on americans. about green jobs. now all of a sudden, you want to trust the administration. >> now the fool's joke is over, and dana, you did a good job. if we stick to that, you would be much better off. the fact of the matter is nobody sitting around this table would have believed they would have gotten 7 million. >> they were going to find some way, make a way to say 7 million. >> this is the thing i said before and i'll say again. there are studies, independent studies saying a lot of people who were uninsured have gotten
1:06 am
insured. there are a lot of people who lost their insurance because of obamacare. now, that was 5 million or 6 million, it's down to a million. there are millions of people who are benefitting from this. here's the problem for the republicans. there now is a huge political base invested in obamacare, and it's going to carry them in november. >> how are they benefitting when they haven't even paid their first premium? >> about 85% of them paid for it. >> you see the young people from the galifianakis bump getting their premium, saying i'm going to follow through? they're not going to do this. >> according to mckinsey and company, 85% have paid their bills. >> i want, because kathleen sebelius, health and human services secretary was asked about obamacare being a tough sell today, and she had very little to say. >> 64% of oklahomans aren't buying into the health care plan. they don't like obamacare. and they have been pretty vocal about it. now, that's going to be still continue to be a tough sell, but
1:07 am
we'll see how that plays out over the coming months. all right, secretary sebelius. thank you so much for being with us this morning. i think we have probably lost sound here or something. >> i can hear you. but i -- thanks for having me. >> you're welcome. >> i think she was like, who cares about oklahoma anyway? let me ask you a question, bob. and we're not joking anymore. >> no, we're not. >> president obama and the white house, very good at stage craft. >> right. >> lots of people behind them. we saw all the people behind them, remember the fainting pregnant lady. how come there wasn't a single democrat behind him today running for the senate in 2014? >> if i was in the political consulting business, i would tell my clients to shy away. from where it is four months ago to where it is today, huge steps have been made. by november, i think republicans are going to be left with egg on
1:08 am
their face. >> that's my line. >> what huge steps? what huge steps? >> 7.1 million is pretty huge. >> 6 million got kicked off. >> now 7 million. >> we don't know how many are young people. what we do know, in all the studies and your mckinsey study, premiums going up, deductibles going up. >> premiums were going up every year before obama was elected. >> they sold us on the fact it was going to go down. >> cbo also said it was going to cost $2 trillion. they say 2 million americans are want going to have jobs because of it. eric is right, deductibles are up. premiums are skyrocketing. >> today. >> millions of people can't access their doctors. can't access their hospital. >> let's see what happened in november. >> your comment is it's so much better now than it was several months ago. what is better? >> several months ago, you couldn't get on the computer. >> if this is such a good thing,
1:09 am
why are they pushing the employer mandate back? >> if you could talk about things that are still yet to come, because you have the income tax increase, the medical device tax, employer mandate that has been pushed, and religious objections heard in the supreme court, and the subsidies that the government is supposed to give and whether or not nay can be given on state or federal exchanges. still a lot left. >> so republicans do have a challenging mission in front of them because the goal of this was never to lower premiums. it was never to bend down the cost curve. it was never to get people to get insured. it was to get people dependent on government subsidies. it was a wealth redistribution scheme. that's working. two things i'm watching, dana, not just the supreme court and not just medicaid expansion. the employer mandate, which i think is a huge deal, but also there is a case, the way they sloppily wrote this bill, there is a case that is moving its way through the courts that says
1:10 am
that the federal government cannot dole out subsidies. they have to go through state exchanges. if dana -- if this gets to the supreme court and is overturned, this is the only hope for this entire bill being dismantled, and it could happen. >> i think jesse is on to something about the numbers not really adding up. remember early, the first few months, they found for every enrollee, there was, i think there were four medicaid recipients signing up for medicaid. they were going on, finding out i qualify for medicaid so i'm going to sign up for that instead of paying a premium and buying insurance. good for them. >> okay, so if there are 7 million who have signed up, does that mean 28 million are on medicaid? >> i hope so. >> or did somehow the mix change, or is jesse right that these numbers just simply don't add up? >> what do you think jesse is going to say? he was lying about obama from the time i met him. >> how did they get to 7 million? >> they counted them. >> what are duplicates?
1:11 am
what are medicaid? >> i don't know. how do you do the computer and figure it out? >> i can't get a computer to figure it out. the website crashes. >> instead of saying the numbers are lies, why don't you prove it? >> i'm going to wrap it up. >> can i say one more thing? >> i have to make a point before we go. >> if they have a death spiral where no young people sign up, premium s sky rocket before the midterms. >> originally when the bill was passed, remember the number the democrats were touting was not 7.1 million. it was 19 million uninsured to get covered. >> this chart from the apothecary shows this is what cbo wanted, projections for people to be on -- previously uninsured to be insured, excuse me. this is how many they got. it was supposed to be 22.8. it's now 12.5. this is my graphic. also, i'm going to answer a question that you asked. how do you prove it? if i were jay carney today or
1:12 am
whoever the press secretary is in the future, the question is, don't just prepare for today's briefing. but prepare for friday's or next week's because these numbers will have to come out eventually because they're going to have to score it. that's when you're going to have to explain there are still 40 million uninsured after basically taking a wrecking ball. >> this is what is called sour grapes around this table. >> our grapes here are very sweet. very, very good. >> you guys hooked your engines onto this failing and you're not going to get it to fail. >> you hooked it on working. >> i want to see people get insured and get medical care. why don't republicans come out with ideas. >> we have ideas. >> yeah. >> you are my favorite april fool. >> thank you very much. >> up next, the head of america's biggest automaker, general motors, is on capitol hill today. stemming from faulty ignition switches resulting in the deaths
1:13 am
of more than a dozen people. how will gm explain their way out of that one? more after the break. [ male announcer ] at his current pace, bob will retire when he's 153, which would be fine if bob were a vampire. but he's not. ♪ he's an architect with two kids and a mortgage. luckily, he found someone who gave him a fresh perspective on his portfolio. and with some planning and effort, hopefully bob can retire at a more appropriate age. it's not rocket science. it's just common sense. from td ameritrade.
1:17 am
general motors is a textbook example of why government should steer clear of business. remember when bailout barack obama said this? >> the chevy cobalt that you build here was one of gm's most sought after cars under that program. dealers across the country started running out. you need to build more. >> well, that was september 2009. the obama administration had just bankrupt and recapitalized gm to the tune of $50 billion u.s. tax dollars. fast forward to today, gm is on capitol hill explaining why there was a defective ignition
1:18 am
system in their car, more than a dozen people are dead, and gm knew all along, and you the taxpayer financed the whole shebang. need more perspective. listen to the families. >> driving the car was a game of russian roulette with my safety and that of my friends. the federal government failed to take action and drivers like me were kept in the dark. >> it is clear gm is only concerned with the bottom line and not the safety of our loved ones. >> our daughters, sons, sisters, brothers, mothers, fathers, wives, and husbands are gone because they were a cost of doing business gm style. >> go to dana first. pretty dramatic testimony by the families. >> and extremely good and compelling. that's one of the reasons the story deserves a lot more attention than it has received up to now, but i think with the testimony and this coming to light, you recognize the deaths and you realize the cost to the
1:19 am
families of having to return their vehicles, right? it's 2.3 million vehicles. 2.3 million that have to be returned and fixed at the cost of the company, and i think that this is just the beginning of what gm is going to have to pay. they have sullied their reputation so much you have to wonder about the $50 million. >> bob, let me be the skeptic here. 2008, 2009, when they bankrupted gm, no one could -- >> they bankrupted gm? >> the obama administration bankrupted gm and recapitalized them and recapitalized certain investments. no one could figure out why. i'll be the skeptic here, the cynic. maybe they bankrupted them to make sure that the old gm was responsible for these deaths bah they knew they had a problem and the new gm could go on with business as usual and then they would look like heroes. >> another one of your skepticisms about obama that added to the pile. you made that sound like, of course, we edited out a clip and made obama seem like he was
1:20 am
responsible for building bad ignition switches. by the way, i think they were built in china, weren't they? get to me, chinese government. the fact of the matter is there's no excuse for this. they should have recalled the calls earlier. this reminds me, i'm old enough to remember the pinto, there was a rear-end cash, one ralph nader made his reputation on this. this is an inexcusable case, and that new ceo from gm ought to be out of a job. >> we, the government, our u.s. government u our taxpayers sold our last piece of gm at a loss last year. now we're find out there's 13 deaths. is this too close for comfort? >> design defects and recalls happen a lot. people don't like them and the media reports them, but this is different. why did general motors hide this for seemingly over a decade? that's what's really strange. bob, you brought up the ford pinto. as further research showed, it
1:21 am
was risk over reward. they figured, we'll take the risk to reap the reward in stead of paying for the $20 part. i'm not saying that's what gm decided to do here. but the issue here is the government backed gm, clearly was not doing its due diligence, and this is the problem with progressives. they believe government is good. they pick their friends. it's crony capitalism at its worse and they don't do due diligence because they believe anything the government gets involved in is good, period. >> now progressives are responsible, right? >> if you're going to drop $50 billion into a company, you better make sure there are no pending lawsuits to the tune of $20 billion. >> the obama administration directly oversaw the recaptization, but let's pretend something, bush is president, exxonmobil is in texas. bush bails them out. billions of dollars in taxpayer
1:22 am
bailout. they oversee them going back, but then exon starts polluting, and they pollute and pollute and a whole town dies, 13 people, something like that, but bush has run on the fact that he's built this company back up and got re-elected based partially on that. this would be a mega scandal. a mega scandal. like dana said, this is going to get a lot more attention. >> that would assume george bush knew something like that was going on any more than obama knew. >> especially when you're playing with somebody else's money, you better make sure -- >> or was there fraud? say there was appropriate oversight, but it was hidden from the government. then the company has an initial problem, and who is looking out for the employees and workers? you mentioned the ceo, but she's only been ceo for three months. she actually -- some are crediting her with actually being the one who has to come up and clean up the guys' mess they left. >> to dana's point, if fraud was committed, that would be
1:23 am
bankruptcy fraud. who is going to hold them accountable? the government? >> can i read this michael moore quote? there are people on the right who are going to agree with this. i'm opposed to the death penalty, but to every rule there's usually an except. i hope someone in the obama administration will march into gm headquarters in downtown detroit and holloway anyone who is there who had anything to do with this, and if they already went down, hunt them down to face justice. >> you wonder why companies allow this to happen, i don't understand why this didn't come out in the first place. >> money. it's $10 per switch. you know, it's cost somewhere around a billion to retool all the cars. >> they're going to get much more than this in lawsuits. >> they were broke. >> we don't know if that's what they decided, but one has to assume they decided the reward was greater than the risk. look, at least michael moore is somewhat consistent. however, imagine if we wouldn't
1:24 am
have bailed them out. they would be screaming, the progressive movement, about something totally different, and we failed all these workers. so this is again why government should not get involved in this kind of thing. they can't run companies. >> also, incredibly hypocritical of michael moore. his lack of government oversight, and then all of a sudden, benghazi, fast and furious, people died there, too. does michael moore care about that? >> thought you didn't like regulations and oversight. >> we want a little bit so people don't die. good if you're going to make an investment, make sure there's not a big -- >> yes or no, would you let gm just go away? >> i would have let it go bankrupt because someone else would have bought them and it wouldn't have been our money. >> disturbing developments out of delaware. a dupont heir with no jail time after convicted of raping his 3-year-old daughter. is the american justice system a joke? more on this after the break.
1:29 am
we have a truly outrageous and heartbreaking story for you today. in 2009, robert h. richards, a wealthy heir to the dupont paint fortune was convicted of the heinous crime of raping his own 3-year-old daughter. his sentence, probation and some community service. but no jail time. delaware superior court judge was apparently swayed by the argument that richards would, quote, not fare very well in prison. that being said, the verdict in this case seems to be falling on the part of the entire legal system. it should be noted that this case only re-entered public consciousness after attorneys for his ex-wife filed a lawsuit seeking damages for the abuse of
1:30 am
their two children. bob, the legal system clearly failing here. is it appropriate to say that he should have his testicles cut off and fried in oil? i'm serious. >> and then fed to some rottweillers. look, the fact is that once she gave him the sentence, the charge against his 8-year-old son, abusing his 8-year-old son, was taken off the table. i mean, what are they thinking? what is this judge thinking? he wasn't going to do well in prison? good, that's the idea. >> what is strange about that? originally he got two second degree convictions that carry 20 years and they pled down to a fourth degree which was probation and no jail time on the basis he may not do well. he's 6'4", 240. if he's not going to do well, if that's the basis, it has nothing to do with him doing well, it has to do, my guess, his name. >> it wasn't the judge who said he wouldn't fare well. it was one of the attorneys in the hearing.
1:31 am
clearly, the judge agreed with the argument and said we'll give you minor probation and no jail time. is this where people lose faith in the legal system because they see as eric points out, the affluezna defense, and he's a little boy -- actually, he's not little, and he wouldn't do well. >> it could be a lack of faith in the legal system, and also a lack of faith in the media. this came down in 2004. it was not held in secret. supposedly, there are reporters who go to the courthouse in delaware, and we're only hearing about it now because there's a lawsuit pending, and it's come up again. also, on the judge, this particular judge, when i read this entire thing about the sentencing process, i don't think it's fair to her, necessarily, to say she decided this. the attorney general, the prosecution, i think, actually deserves a lot more of the condemnation for this. >> jesse, who is toblame? as dana points out, the d.a. offered him a plea which was
1:32 am
fourth degree rape of a child, which his wife alleges he raped both of their children, a boy and girl, but carried no mandatory time, even though there's a 15-year sentence. dana brings up the media. you bring up the judge. who is to blame? >> there's another element of corruption here. i think there might be a smoking gun. biden's son is the a.g. in delaware. when he was asked, did you know what was going oin your office when this was signed off on, this is the most wealthy family in the entire state. they sign off on a plea deal for no jail time on a child rape, and you don't know about it? he's either lying or he's incompetent. i don't know -- i don't think someone istruth. >> you probably should get your timeline right. he was fighting in afghanistan when this took place. he came back and then ran for attorney general. >> it's his office. let me tell you how sick this guy is. we looked at the warrant. the guy groomed this girl. she said he said let's keep it a
1:33 am
little secret, okay? there were disgusting things he did, and he got no prison time because they wanted to make sure he was rehabbed. you can do rehab in jail. you can do rehab out of jail. doesn't matter. no one cares about the victim. that's the problem. >> i do, but i don't think you can blame it on someone who wasn't in the office at that point. the fact of the matter is, the state shouldn't be -- a fourth degree rape charge, you don't go to jail? you should go to jail for any rape. >> eric, if there are more questions than answers, shouldn't then the media do due diligence to find out who signed off on this. his name is dupont, as jesse mentioned. it's not exactly, bob, congenkture that sometimes political favors are done for people with money. i mean, come on. >> they're republicans, remember that. >> they're probably, you know, i don't know, hundreds of this cases all over the place. when they do spring up, i mean, o'reilly has another one, another one somewhere in arizona, somewhere out west. >> another case in nevada.
1:34 am
there was a judge, he oversaw a case where the guy was facing ten years. he signed off on the plea deal for child rape. the prosecutor signed off on it, and the judge said, i'm going to give him probation. he doesn't explain himself. also this judge will not explain herself either. that's the problem. not accountable. >> any final thoughts, dana? really nothing else to say. this is probably the most atrocious story that we have done on this show in a while. directly ahead, the network newscast blow a gasket over the u.n. climate report. are they correct in ringing the alarm or is it propaganda in the mainstream media? that's debate next on "the five."
1:39 am
report on climate change. it's a dire call for action and a, quote, urgent new warning. watch them freak out. >> a new united nations report raised the threat of climate change to a whole new level. >> we turn to an urgent warning from scientists. the extreme weather we have enjoyed together could be the harold of a new normal climate change. >> we have never been warned like this before, all of us, about climate change. here's the takeaway. unless the world changes course quickly and dramatically, the fundamental systems that support human civilization are at risk. >> ooh. funny how the network reports featured no critics or even a quote from a climate change skeptic. so does brian williams drive a prius? is he buying this? what is the motivation behind the media propaganda reports? is it money, you think? >> you can be an alarmist, you can scare the heck out of
1:40 am
people, say what is he saying? and they get the viewer. i get why the media does that. people do that all over the place, all types of mode yeah. the more alarming, the more provocative, the more viewers you get. i get that. the problem is why do they continue to put out the reports they know are false? i mean, there's no proof of man-made global warming. there may be prove of global warming. wasn't there an ice age and it's warmer now? that had nothing to do with man. here's why, because there's probably in the neighborhood of $50 to $75 million a year full of money that goes to finance research, finance offices, to finance exotic travel to these places to take climate temperatures, and they have to keep that game going. follow the money, follow that money. if they were to say everything is good, everything is fine, the money would dry up. >> bob, you're a u.n. guy? you believe in the u.n.? they come up with this every year. iran is in the human rights commission. are you believing what they're
1:41 am
putting out there? >> i believe in the u.n. let me say this. normally we have greg here who is the flat earth representative, and you're sitting in his chair, i might add, so for you and the rest of the flat earthers, this is 772 leading scientists who did this. now, i want to see where your 772 -- and eric said they're all lying. you think 772 scientists got together and said, okay, we're going to pull a lie. we're all going to say there's global warming. >> it's called summer. >> there's a lot of money based on them propagating that lie. >> if you look at the same report from a decade ago, they were saying the world is going to end in a couple years so we should all be dead. the point is the network anchors parrot what the report says. if you read the report, it reads like a bedtime nightmare. these scientists don't have a lot of credibility with me. they said this was going to happen years ago. i think it's bigger than money. it goes back to the progressive argument that government can control the weather. if they can control the weather, they can control our lives.
1:42 am
they can control everything down to our appliances in our homes, and lastly, what was the big thing they wanted to control? cow flatulence, and they're assuming they can control them in russia and india and all those other countries. imagine saying that to vladimir putin. if we could get our hands on your livestock, we could end this problem. >> there are calls to arrest the climate change deniers. some website is putting this out. do you think this has reached some sort of ridiculous level where they want to arrest anybody who disagrees with you? why would they do that? >> the hyperbole and breathle breathlessness of the reporter becomes too much to understand. i take it, i say, okay, 772 scientists, i'm for it. what it doesn't include is a realistic solution that a policy prescription that could do anything about it. the world is the world. you cannot hive off and say the united states should do something if no one else is
1:43 am
going to do it as well because then you won't have done anything. in the united states, our emissions have gone down. the only answer to the problems is economic growth. the way to get economic growth is through energy production. we have shown in the united states it was economic growth, you get innovation. it leads you to cleaner burning fuels so you can deal with things like global warming. what they're suggesting right now is basically, i had a cold last week. they say i went to the doctor and they said you have a common cold. we're going to have to take your leg. that's the situation that they present you with policy wise. >> i agree with dana. what she said makes a lot of sense, but jesse, 772 scientists. name me five on the other side? >> can you name one of the 17,000? >> professor stewart marquee. >> professor spencer from alabama, he doesn't buy any of this junk. >> professor who? >> roy spencer. you know what he says? it's a big transfer of wealth scheme so you have these rich
1:44 am
countries -- yes, rich countries that send all the money to these developing nations so they can fight climate change, and it's all about dollars, bob. i have to go. it's getting warm. >> best part of the segment right there. >> heavy hitter johnny depp diss america for communist china. professor beckel can't wait to school captain sparrow on progressive 101 after the break. i must begin my journey,
1:46 am
which will cause me to miss the end of the game. the x1 entertainment operating system lets your watch live tv anywhere. can i watch it in butterfly valley? sure. can i watch it in glimmering lake? yep. here, too. what about the dark castle? you call that defense?! come on! [ female announcer ] watch live tv anywhere. the x1 entertainment operating system, only from xfinity.
1:55 am
if you only knew what happened in the commercial break. time now for "one more thing." andrea is going to kick us off. >> shocking video and it's not coming this time from jesse waters. campusreform.org send one of its rising reporters, a girl i admire, to the national young feminist leadership conference, she got some interviews about what the conference about young feminism was about. take a listen. >> everybody can be a feminist, really. >> feminism is for everyone. >> everyone from every background. >> everyone from every different background, very inclusive, not exclusive. then guess what happened when they found out this was a conservative group? >> just to let you know, this is a conservative media. i wanted to warn you. >> conservative news. >> we're not wanting here? >> they're not wanted here. so much for inclusivety. very good work by
1:56 am
campusreform.org, exposing feminists. >> interesting. bob, you're next. >> i have another student story here. there's a dude on long island, the kid applied to and got accepted to all eight -- all eight ivy league schools. this is what he said to say about it. >> appreciation and thankfulness for all my teachers for helping me with the grades and what not, all the way down to the counselor, and lastly, of course, your family, parents, for all the support. my preference is yale. all the things i want in college, i still have to compare these schools, wonderful schools. >> congratulations. i applied to my father's alma mater. they didn't even send me a rejection letter. that's how bad it was. congratulations. >> in the circular file. >> i really hope eric watched that segment. last night, i'm watching the factor, and bill o'reilly was talking about tesla, and i
1:57 am
e-mailed bill and the producer and said good lord, really, bill? $500 billion? he took me up on the offer. i sat down with bill o'reilly. here's how it ends. take a look at this. >> eric bolling, smarter than i am. you guys can decide. >> i like that. jesse, you're next. >> okay, so the u.s. state department is spending $400,000 on a white fiberglass camel looking at a needle. it's going to go in front of the u.s. embassy in islamabad, pakistan. okay, this is john kerry's camel, everybody. that hump looks a little suspicious, i think. that's what your taxpayer money is going towards. a camel. >> wait, a glass camel in of all places pakistan? >> yes. >> i hope they have insurance. >> i'm not walking past that
1:58 am
every day. >> will it carry water is the question? >> it will carry something. >> okay, i love this. awkward family photos. you probably have some. there's a whole book that has been written about it, a new display that is going to take place in california heritage museum. it opens on march 28th in santa monica. they're hilarious. the books are great. they're going to take this all around the country. awkwardfamily's photos.com is where you can find more. we took our own. do we have that to show everybody? no? >> what? >> there it is. don't forget to set your dvr. we'll see you ba >> it is wednesday april 2nd and a fox news alert. people running and ducking for cover after a massive deadly earthquake strikes chili li.
1:59 am
a life report straight ahead. >> texas and illinois bracing for wicked weather. >> high winds and heavy winds even tornadoes possible today. maria molina is tracking the threat. >> 7.1 million. that's how many people the white house says signed up for obamacare. is his victory lap premature. why charles krauthammer says those numbers are outright phony. "fox and friends first starts right now. >> total chaos after a powerful 8.2 magnitude earthquake rocked the coast of chile leaving five people dead. this is incredible cid yo capturing the moments it hit.
2:00 am
(speaking foreign language) >> now listen to the sirens sounding in the background. the quake also triggering a tsunami with waves as high as 6 feet. you can see people frantically running in the street as they try to evacuate. 300 inmates escape from a local prison. at least 16 of them have been sk captured at this hour. all of the warnings have been canceled. the sunni advisory it is in hawaii. >> gone sglzolo what do we knowt the damage? >> at this point walls have fallen but no deaths in that area. also some of the
179 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on