two men noticed boy driving erratically and called 911. he was at a doctor's appointment with his grandfather and argument with his sibling, the boy took off. he eventually crashed into a railing. jon: that is a the good news. we'll see you back here in an hour. "outnumbered" starts right now. >> this is "outnumbered." i'm sandra smith here today, harris faulkner, kimberly guilfoyle, kirsten powers, today's #oneluckyguy dominic di-natale and he is outnumbered. and here from l.a. >> this will be a baptism of fire. >> you've been all over the world for this network. >> that is incredible. i live in l.a. these days. night and day where someplaces i've been before. if only because of the weather. >> you could have brought us some sunshine.

we have a precipitation here in new york. pleasure to have you here. >> our first accent on the sofa. >> there we go. >> strap on your seatbelt, dominic. this wasn't fun ride. breaking ranks. two house democrats call forge a va secretary eric shinseki to go. one of them georgia congressman david scott, delivering this fiery message from president obama to the house floor. >> i listened to the president today and i was very disappointed with president obama today. there was no urgency. mr. president, we need urgency. we need you to roll up our sleeves and get into these hospitals! >> meantime the president's critics the claims of secret va waiting list and some veterans allegedly dying while waiting for car speak to a larger problem in the administration es approach to governing. for charles krauthamer the crisis pretty much obliterates the promise of, yes we can. >> he can't even run a

decades-old normal, absolute mundane health care system that are run everywhere in the world between here and togo. so the idea this is government that is going to do great new things, universal preschool and all of these wonderful promises is totally dissolved. it redowns against the part in government. >> piece in the "national journal" weighing in. ron fournier sees this as deeper issue with the obama presidency. he writes in quote, launch affordable care act and worsening conditions at department of veterans affairs are emblematic of obama's inattention to governing. he is slow to fire poor serving cab bet members. to mr. obama, transparency is a mere talking point. kirsten, ouch, members of his own party are turning against him as the scandal widens. >> this is not something he can

write off and me they don't like me. i think that ron fournier definitely hit the nail on the head this is a much bigger problem with obama. this is something we see time and time again. i think it is worse for him, as much as we can say look, the va has been a problem for a long time under republican presidents, president came in as somebody who was saying government's the solution and really saying we can look to the government and we can fix problems. the fact he hasn't been able to make progress, in fact you could argue it has gotten worse on his watch is not a great endorsement. >> dominic, clearly this investigation is continuing and the president is waiting to see what findings are but meanwhile we have whistle-blower after whistle-blower, story after story of veterans impacted and their families. something needs to be done and what is it? >> the way the va is run is absolute monolith quite frankly. when these little fiefdoms and prevent anything getting done within it.

so he has to look there. go in hard and really has to shake it up. government is slow. we know it is very sluggish but the va, the problems have existed for far too long. it has to be a big shake-up. that is the answer. >> he will do nothing. he will say that he is outraged, that this is upsetting but he will not do the action dominic is calling for. he has two years left in his firm. pass the buck. blame it on republicans if they get in on 2016. the documents and proof are there. that is issue with obama, what we're seeing over and over again this repetitive theme, uninformed, isolated finding out about things through the news instead of top of the investigation. as far as back in 2008 in the transition papers he was made aware of this problem. am i saying just developed and uniquely ownership to president obama? no. this existed before and he did know about it. see some kind of acknowledgement in that regard and do a test case of a hospital that you privatize, that you run, a

revamping to see if that model works. put best practice there is and spread it to other va hospitals. >> hearing from the both sides of the aisle, harris. the lack of urgency you heard in the first clip of the where is the administration? why are they not coming out fiercely on this topic. >> members of one single party, calling on him, where is the yes we can. let me see is what president saying. he had a opportunity to lay out a case getting rid of eric shinseki. who knows if that will quiet down the masses. the public is looking for chains of accountability. he laid out the case and he didn't do it. and he didn't get rid of shinseki. as you said, kirsten he basically ran on this government can fix this. government can fix everything. he said veterans were important to him. he is the commander-in-chief. these are his ranks. why is he not taking care of them? to your house had

committee meeting subpoenaed or should say they're threatening subpoena they want va administrators to come forward. they won't come to hill. they won't come. why not? what are they hiding? >> probably a lot. there is so much more going on that we realize. everybody that knows a vet is something you hear these stories. what is people going on at va. people with ptsd can not get in for a year. it is completely inhumane. >> fournier went on he believes this scandal marks the lowest point of president's obama's presidency. >> i agree with that. i thought it was going to be obamacare. this is probably worse especially if you look the way democrats are turning on him. that is more bipartisan thing. let's move on to unemployment, another cheery topic. nearly half of unemployed americans are not looking for work anymore. a new survey find 47% have completely given up.

this as the labor department announced applications for unemployment benefits went up last week to 326,000, still low enough to suggest hiring should hold steady. last month unemployment was at 6.3%, the lowest since 2008. but when you take into account those who would like a job and who work part time, the real unemployment rate for april was 12.3%, or 19.5 million americans. wow, 19.5 million americans, sandra. i guess one of the questions about unemployment, people are saying, they're not looking for work. >> there are no jobs. also there are no jobs, right? isn't that part of the problem? >> part of the problem is laziness as well because they are accepting these unemployment benefits for very long periods of time. in this survey it backs that up, saying polls suggest the aid may be diminishing their incentive to find employment. 82% of those surveyed unemployed, if their aid was to run out prior to finding a job

they would have more incentive to go out and find work. so that is not helping the situation. but, kirsten, to your point, bottom line, we don't have a business-friendly administration right now. we're not growing jobs. gdp growth is dismal. it is flat. 0.1%. you can not grow jobs out of thin air. you have to have growth in the country for jobs and for hiring to happen. >> harris, a lot of people, i mean the administration would say we needed approach everything differently. we need stimulus. do more to stimulate the economy. >> they did do all of that. >> additional stimulus and had we done that then the economy would be doing better. paul krugman argument. >> the recovery came far too late. these people in some cases years looking for a job. you get fatigued and get up. you can't have any hope with that sort of a situation. i worry about what this will do to america in the long term. majority of people that can't get work tend to be older and so, what that is going to do to the workforce in terms of that knowledge and experience that is suddenly drops out of there?

yeah, a lot of people, a lot of companies want to hire young people, device frankly because they're cheap labor but the companies suffer in the long term. the government has got to look at that. private sector has got to look at that. the truth the matter the government should have created better recovery much earlier on. >> harris a lot of young people are having trouble getting jobs. what does that bode for them? >> period in history that statistics bearing out. people stay without jobs longer than any period since the 1930s. it is discouraging, that is one part of it. but american life has changed. in our lifetimes there is phenomenon no longer happens. people don't move great distances for work anymore. they try to hang on to houses that they have. that is unfortunate because many of them are underwater. they can't sell them. they have to foreclose if they want to move on. they have to take the bad credit with them. you don't have people moving to jobs. government needs to incentivize, i agree with sandra, not just get companies to stay in the usa, yes, we want that but smaller towns so people can stay

where they are and also work. >> there is not a real good framework and system in place. we don't have someone with a tremendous. amount of business experience in the oval office. would i prefer someone like mitt romney especially this moment in time to get jobs going again. that would be my choice with that level of expertise. they're operating with a form of disincentive instead of a incentive to move forward. lowering of extension and threshold for benefits, becomes very easy, not that people don't want good jobs to provide for their families, becomes easy to go with the status quo what is safe and not providing a lot of motivation for americans to get the help and a hand out instead of just keeping them in positions they're in or drawing benefits. >> let's talk about something else that people are waiting in on today and weighing in on. aclu is going after a florida school district for operating single sex classrooms and using what it calls sex it teaching methods. in one district, teachers gave

girls a dab of perfume if they did a task correctly. then come forked them if they made a mistake. on flip side the boys were spoken to in firmer more authoritative voice when they messed up and allowed to bring in electronics for behaving well. the spokesperson for the school said program is popular. parents are enthusiastically about it. dominic, boys versus girls and drawing a line right down middle of the classroom. what do you think? >> this creates dysfunctional people quite frankly. chasing stereotypes here. where are we actually going to go with this? it's a case of look, what we need is girls and boys to relate from early age. we end up having better relationships when we turn into adults. it is as simple as that i don't believe in all-girl classes and all-boy classes. i think you need a lot of crossover. try thing like perfume for awards and electronics for boys, for goodness sakes, that is

outdated. ma is problem from the teachers from the wrong generation. >> what if it is working? children respond to this and teaching method and reward incentive problem they developed had good results. parents like it. kids like it. i wouldn't throw on a 5 or 6-year-old girl mind craft game or -- >> why not. >> unless they wanted it. i would try to go to the individual. i would say, what is your favorite kind of thing to do? what interests you? what is your reward? i know -- >> i think it is downright scary they would do this to girls. they say girls are not abstract thinkers. they're not mathematicians and their brains don't work like that. putting them in other classes putting boys in front of the math. that is destructive. >> i might like something different. i might like sports reward versus perfume. >> it is a question, sound like they have, from what i've read they have a blanket way they're doing it and one side for the girls and one side for the boys. i wonder how they decided on

those two things though you know the electronics? my girls play with electronics. i'm sure boys are out there that love smell good. i'm wondering -- >> they're working under the premise we're hardwired from the moment we're conceived and come out of the womb girls think one way and boys are capable of thinking one way. "scientific american" -- >> that is -- >> they came out and said, the assumption differences are inate or hardwired, dominic are invalid. experience what is change your brains. >> come on, men and women are different. >> how are they different? >> just the way they think and approach thing. talk a little bit about sexual dysfunction amongst women and how that is sort of affects them. that is coming up in the next segment the way we approach absolutely everything in life. my thing here is, it sound like this system is actually, is actually teaching woman, sorry, teaching girls how to be women. do you understand what i mean by that? >> no. >> basically how you should be

as a woman. >> gender indoctrination? >> yeah, basically. by putting perfume on girls, that tells you you've got to follow that stereotype. >> dominic -- >> i think that -- >> this will fall off. she is making a face. >> i mean, i don't actually, the perfume doesn't bother me as much as saying that girls brains don't function in abstract way. i do think men and women's brains actually do operate a little differently but, women can think abstractly. >> all right. throw the bums out. i mean not any bums that we know necessarily. nearly nine of 10 americans say most lawmakers on capitol hill need to go. so why does that never seem to happen? plus, trouble in the bedroom. actually dominic was just forecasting what we're going to talk about here. usually an easy fix just for the men. just pop a pill, a bill blue -- little blue pill in most cases, they're are a lot on the market.

for woman, there are no fda approved pills? how do they get help for sexy times? what is up with that? how do guys get it and women don't? is that a good way to say it? ♪. sfx: car unlock beep. vo: david's heart attack didn't come with a warning. today his doctor has him on a bayer aspirin regimen to help reduce the risk of another one. if you've had a heart attack be sure to talk to your doctor before you begin an aspirin regimen.

could mean less waiting for things like security backups and file downloads you'd take that test, right? well, what are you waiting for? you could literally be done with the test by now. now you could have done it twice. this is awkward. check your speed. see how fast your internet can be. switch now

and add voice and tv for $34.90. comcast business built for business. >> about to get spicy. welcome back to "outnumbered." did you know there are 25 approved sexual dysfunction drugs for men? guess how many for women? zero. until now it was called the little pink pill. sandra, you would not like that. would be first drug of its kind to help females out in the bedroom. i don't know if we need any help. that is if approved by the food and drug administration. the drug's maker has been fighting for approval for three years. the fda saying only effect is barely modest. every time you turn the tv on there is commercial for helping the boys out. so why the double-standard? right? sandra, i don't want to lose you with the pill is pink. stay with me on that. [laughter]. what do you think? is this double-standard? like the twice can get a leg up

in the bedroom? >> you guys -- can't believe you said that? >> no, i think there is explanation for this. something along the line it is easier for you to prove when a man has a problem than when a woman has a problem. a lot of times they have a hard time diagnosing a woman when she has a problem. >> true. >> i will leave it at that. >> well-done. well-done. >> in my preparation for this, reading article about the drug, that women, they have to focus when there is sexual dysfunction it is all in brain apparently. that is the difficulty. >> with men is is more mechanical i guess. >> that's a great point. maybe harris, for women they don't need something actually to help with the mechanics of it. >> they do at a certain age. >> yes. >> over the age of 40 they do. i actually poll ad lifeline. i called dr. marc siegel who is one of our fox news medical a-teamers.

>> oh, my god. >> we talked about fda approving stuff. there is couple reasons why they won't approve the drug. for one it doesn't work really well. that shouldn't be an excuse because they approve drugs that don't work well along time. part of the problem is the brain, psycho tropic. part of it is bodily function. he thinks viagra is great. >> for women? >> for women. 50% of the times he prescribes viagra for female patients because it workses. >> why only advertise to men. >> his thought, leading thing for men, because they are a lot easier to fix than women. the pill is blue. >> pick a different color. >> blood pressure at end of the day. >> give it a different color and give it a different name. they do that kind of stuff. >> they put something out on the market and drug has a cross benefit. not initially indicated for that and they do further studies. i'm for people getting help. >> whatever they need. >> whatever they need to get their groove on.

>> what is interesting thing in the article, one. woman who wanted it married a long time and she was no longer having amazing sex for her husband. i'm not married. isn't that sort of what happens? that is my question, is that something you need a drug for or -- >> spice it up. buy some lingerie or heels like this, let me tell you. that gets the motor going. >> viagra for men, it is not just for the men, if you know what i mean? [laughter]. >> you're absolutely right. >> i'm out. that's it. >> aye yi yi. >> v for victory. would you like to vent on twitter or on facebook? watch out, because some postings could actually cost you your job. all right? plus americans giving congress a big thumbs down as we head to the midterms but stunning number of folks who say they don't care which party runs the show. what to make of this, huh? ♪.

i don't just make things for a living i take pride in them. so when my moderate to severe chronic plaque psoriasis was also on display, i'd had it. i finally had a serious talk with my dermatologist. this time, he prescribed humiradalimumab. humira helps to clear the surface of my skin by actually working inside my body. in clinical ials, most adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis saw 75% skin clearce. and the majority of people were clear or almost clear in just 4 months. humira can lower your ability to including tuberculosis. serious, somimes fatal events, such as infections, lymphoma, or other types of cancer have happened. blood, livernd nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure have occurred. before starting humira, your door should test you for tb.

ask your doctor if you live in or have been to a region where certain fungal infections are common. tell your doctor if you have had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have symptoms such as fever, fatigue, cough, or sores. you should not start humira if you have any kind of infection. make the most of every moment. ask your dermatologist about humira, today. clearer skin is possible. tigers, both of you. tigers? don't be modest. i see how you've been investing. setting long term goals. diversifying. dip! you got our attention. we did? of course. you're type e* well, i have been researching retirement strategies. well that's what type e*s do. welcome home. taking control of your retirement? e*trade gives you the tools and resources to get it right. are you type e*?

mayo? corn dogs? you are so outta here! aah! [ female announcer ] the complete balanced nutrition of great-tasting ensure. 24 vitamins and minerals, antioxidants, and 9 grams of protein. [ bottle ] ensure®. nutrition inharge™.

eating healthier,tion by [ bottle ] ensure®. drinking plenty of water, but still not getting relief? try dulcolax laxative tablets. dulcolax is comfort-coated for gentle, over-night relief. dulcolax. predictable over-night relief you can count on. >> welcome back to "outnumbered." with less than six months until the midterms most americans seem to be souring on congress. according to a new ap poll only 14% approve of the job congress is doing. check this out, "cbs news poll"

finding near 5% think members of congress deserve to come back. that 5%, lowest ever recorded in cbs polls. this is nearly nine in 10, 85% say, throw them out. but when it comes to which party controls congress seems like americans are giving a big collective, who cares. that same ap poll show nearly half of americans, 46% don't even care who is in control of congress. so what is going on, kimberly? they're so likeable, members of congress. what don't americans see? >> they need a pill. because they are really just losing us completely. people are not tapped in. they're not exciting about who is serving them because there is general distrust of government. there is feeling we're using our taxpayer dollars to put these people up in the capitol. they're not delivering. no bang for the buck. no return for the money. and they don't trust them. they don't like them that much. they're all bad. so it doesn't matter, banana a, banana b gets in they both will

suck. >> this is trend going on for a long time, harris yet 90% of congress gets reelected some what is going on? why do americans not throw them out. >> if you canvas a lot of people, the question not got asked, how many people know who the congress person is? >> great point. >> they go to the poll an pick the box. >> jay leno did it on jaywalking. >> goes with their set of ideas and value system. they don't get to know the candidate. when it turns out the candidate is poor representation of what they believe in, turns out it is too late. they're already in office. >> they have become so disengaged because congress is so dysfunctional they have don't even want -- one thing the "cbs poll," 45% of the americans a record high, they now agree with the statement, it makes no difference which party controls congress. doesn't make any difference. >> one thing about the fact that they don't care but it's another they should care. i was looking at one of the quotes, one of the stories on

this an oil refinery worker who said i never really noticed any difference in my life depending which party is in. he will not even vote in the midterm elections. you're working in the energy industry. you're at an oil refinery. here we're talking about the keystone pipeline, 82% the republicans approve the keystone pipeline and support it. >> right. >> you could be greatly impacted by the decisions made in congress. why would you choose not to care? >> if there's a decision made. >> from there is a decision made. >> a lot of things you could say you go through a lot of things democrat do and people care about would be great for them. i think there is something else going on here. i think that people are checking out because they just feel like -- whoever is in control -- >> everybody in congress just works to get themselves reelected, simple as that. i would suggest something controversial. make it law people vote. it will seement change. it seem meant change. >> are you big on social media

and twitter? >> i am on facebook. >> imagine getting something like this. tweets and facebook posts can really get people fired in one state. kansas state attorney general just approved policy, employees of any public university can be let go for what they post on social media. applies to all forms of blogging, social networking sites but critics are saying it is a violation of speech. kimberly. >> yeah, probably is but i kind of like it. sometimes i like a violation here or there. you know what? you can do this. you can't do it but in this situation i don't like when people are really bad on the twitter and facebook and posting horrible things and so in a certain way, should an employer in a general broad spectrum to be able to kind of dictate to say that is inappropriate in some kind of conduct way or manuel that you sign on to when you go to work for someone? i don't know. that is the tricky kind of legal characterric. >> a lot of peopleproblems here

people are siding on this a faculty member could be fired at a university based on speech contrary to the interests of the university. kirsten, doesn't that change things a little bit? >> the issue of free speech, when speech is infringed on it has to be infringed on by the government to rise to constitutional level. we as americans should say whatever they think. kimberly right, an employer has an image and saying things contrary to what they're doing, i don't, i don't know it necessarily crosses line. my concern would be if they start using it because you're pro-life and you post a pro-life story and say, mozilla type thing that happened. that was infringement, that was his personal views. >> under your profile, say, opinions are my own. >> absolutely. you know what? is this the right place to be putting those opinions out quite frankly? is facebook the place to criticize your company? who really cares? is that what it is actually there for? i used to have a two profiles.

you used to have a personal profile and work profile. i got rid of my personal profile, too many of my female friends were posting uncorns and kittens. it is true. i stick to my work profile. [laughing] way too tragic incidentally. and, you know, i just stick to the work stuff. i think you should. i think if you got that sort of profile all those kind of interests. do it as one thing and stick to that. >> what do you think, harris? >> unfortunately whatever you put online is permanent. >> so true. >> one of the things businesses run into, university is run like a business pretty much, one of the things you run into, no matter how hard you try you can't undo something somebody said about you online. for us that can be damaging and bad thing f you're a university trying to hire people and somebody puts up you treat workers badly, harder to recruit for the university. it gets in the way of livelihood. because it has such a permanent nature. i understand why they do this.

>> what is the most controversial thing you ever deleted, dominic. >> can't tell you. >> you're like a whole different person than i know at work. i like it though. >> that's why i have two profiles. >> very interesting. i sort of outgrew uncorns by 19. i'm curious. >> yeah, okay. [laughter] >> well, we've got something else controversial coming up. dominic we'll get you all fired up about this. what is wrong with wonder woman? she can stop bullets. she flies in invicable plane. what is not to love about her. two moms say she is not such a great example for their girls. so they came up with some new super heroine whose powers are things like honesty and persistent. hmmm. >> i love her. ♪

[ male announcer ] tora bora fallujah argonne khe sanh midway dak to normandy medina ridge the chosin reservoir these are places history will never forget but more important are the faces we will always remember. ♪

take them on the way you always have. live healthy and take one a day men's 50+. a complete multivitamin with 7 antioxidants to support cell health. age? who cares.

if you're looking to buy a car,t this?? now is the time and truecar is the way. just go to truecar.com to lock in guaranteed savings... without negotiation. thank you! happy memorial day weekend!

♪. ♪ wonder woman . ♪ you're a wonder, wonder woman ♪. >> remember wonder woman? linda carter was so iconic. bring her in. she wore the satin tights, fighting for your rights. well, two moms say she is not good enough, not a good role model for them. so they have designed some new action figures aimed empowering girls and bucking stereotypes. they call them i am elemental dolls. with powers like bravery and persistence. they say they're more hair row rin and less hooters. i would never called wonder woman hooters. they a problem with bar by because she is on her tiptoes and can't run around. they're not anti-doll.

just bothered by the fact that the toy set feature knights saving woman and none of the knights are actually ever female. since we'll start with knights and all that go to our friend from britain here. dom, can a woman be a knight? >> know she has to be a dame. is awful phrase because it makes her sound like only unloveable spin sister. i was going to call you dame harris. i want to come back superhero thing the value with figures says women are weak. i think it is terrible to put women figures out like this. i think a real female superhero action figure should be one take as pink pill and put real action into action. >> oh, would you. >> dominic, i don't know if there is chair big enough for you. so i am element tall. is that what you say to your

little girl -- elemental. >> i think this is fine. these are still extremely fit looking action characters. >> right. >> so very, still glorifying the body. and male characters you see, they have beefed up chests and broad shoulders and -- >> because i know that you were superhero, for what, halloween or what was your -- >> shira i love her. >> haven't heard of shira. >> princess of power. she was the best. they made it very clear. they're not against dolls or against princesses they said, this is the tag line. if you give a girl a different toy she will tell a different story. just giving them options. you don't have to play with bar byes. you can play with this. >> seemed like wonder woman who is so awesome. i love linda carter. catwoman. why not. oh, these virtues of bravery and courageous. so is wonder woman. what is wrong with that? >> she flew in invisible plane. that is -- kirsten, what sandra

just said their line about change the story. what is wrong with the current story? >> will think that if you look at the picture of wonder woman versus linda carter, no one has a body like that except kimberly. let's face it. it is a little unreal listtic. same thing with bar by dolls. but i grew up playing with barbie dolls andnd outfits and elevator. >> you're great. >> i'm torn with nye nieces about it. i'm always getting them this kind of stuff. am i teaching them -- >> hoops and sports. >> i played sports. there needs to be a balance. i think criticism about the body is a valid thing. i do think that, you know -- >> it does create sort of unrealistic expectations. >> did you see the point in the story, harris, moms made these for the girls and the sons started playing with them all. children are children. one thing i caught too, the fact they criticized barbie for being on tiptoes which is dig for all

woman who wear high heels. are we supposed to don dowdy shoes and walk around the planet with no heels? what is the story there? you can't stand barbie? >> can you fight crime in high heels? >> yeah, actually i could fight crime in my high heels. kimberly, you and i both have white boots from wonder woman costumes from age-old days. >> yeah, we do. they come in very handy. by that i mean, cheerleader. >> i will say that. >> pan am flight attendant. >> they kay come back in style. you want to borrow them. i guess bottom line, question i have from you dominic or for you, rather, does it matter really what we tell our girls about bravery? i mean it is halloween, right? isn't it just being a role model for them? does it matter how they dress up? >> you know i think women sort of tackle things like equality and glass ceiling things like

that, you have to brave to take that on. >> i like it. >> i have a problem with girls being brave. look at disney movie two years ago, called "brave." it was great stuff. >> boys liked it too. >> i think it's a little flake kim. i think feel like people are trying too hard quite frankly. and i don't know, coming on to the barbie thing i think barbie is completely outdated. one thing, she needs a better male role model as the mattel brand. >> ken can't sit down. >> female role model. >> he keeps it too girlie. what she needs is new man in her life. >> barbie is too feminine? >> ken is in the closet. >> we'll do some news here. >> aye yi yi. >> new information about the boston marathon bombing suspects now. prosecutors have come up with some new information, wait until

you hear how the brothers made their bombs and why they say the suspects had help they think at this point. also a list is out, of the 10 richest stars in hollywood. and you know what? it is a men's only club. big cash money these guys are making. ♪. mine was earned in korea in 1953. afghanistan, in 2009. orbiting the moon in 1971. [ male announcer ] once it's earned, usaa auto insurance is often handed down from generation to generation. because it offers a superior level of protecon. and because usaa'commitment to serve current and former military members andheir families is without equal. begin your legacy. get an auto insurance quote. usaa. we know what it means to serve. over 150 years of swedish coffee experience.xists

that's 150 years of experience in refining and perfecting the rich, never bitter taste of gevalia. and we do it all for this very experience. this very second. this exact moment. [woman] that's good. i know right? cheers to that. gevalia. 150 years of rich, never bitter coffee. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... wife: mmmm husband: these are good! marge: the tasty side of fiber. from phillips.

>> more "outnumbered" in just a minute. let's go to jon scott what is coming up in the second hour of "happening now." jon: we're waiting for new reaction from house minority leader nancy pelosi. she agreed to put five democrats on the select committee about

benghazi. no doubt she will get questions about the investigation. that is coming up. lauras trying to get statements from the surviving suspect thrown out, statements before he made his miranda warning. they were worried that other attacks were imminent so the questioning should be allowed. the bombers reportedly used model car parts to construct their relatively sophisticated bombs. the design suggests to prosecutors the tsarnaev brothers had help. the produce approving a bill to reform nsa. it would end bulk collection of metadata on nearly every phone call placed in the u.s. that is all coming up. sandra, back to you. >> thank you, jon. we'll be watching. >> i may be outnumbered, but in terms of this story, hollywood is known for big stars with very big paychecks but it could be suffering from a gender pay gap. at least that is the question today. comedians, after can americans

and bollywood star top 10 biggest paid actors. no women made the cut. jersey seinfeld, $101 million. tom cruise comes next and johnny depp and tyler perry closely after. i think there is one reason for this. it has absolutely nothing to do with the gender gap. i think we blame it on cinemagoers, predominantly men. big blockbuster action movies take all the money. that is led by male stars. of course they get paid more because that is how hollywood is tom nated. >> i have a different opinion on that. the average age of folks you saw, the top five actors with the largest net worth, all of them over the age of 44. most of them over the age of 50. if you were to go into the top 10, klimt eastwood makes the list at 83 years old. men last longer in hollywood. they have more time to a

accumulate these tens of millions of dollars. >> just about buy that but yeah, i think it is true. also men, the truth of that matter is, men get better with age. >> oh. >> that is true. >> you like to throw flames on the floor to see if it will burn, right? i think you like to put gasoline -- i didn't notice a wedding ring on the finger. >> no. >> a little bit of backstory. i will tell it after the commercial. >> save it for later? >> yeah. she was over 19, right? >> legal, yeah. >> you know what is interesting to me about this though, why aren't women in hollywood rallying in the streets about this? why are people being so quiet? >> they want jobs. they don't want ones speaking out to create a problem, people like angelina jolie like you're talking about, make quite a tremendous living or julia roberts or any of these, reese witherspoons of the world, sandra bullock, they're making

great money. they should say something so their other female counterparts and actors can be compensated in the same way. >> i feel like there is perennial conversation that goes on about the fact there are not enough roles for women in hollywood. there are many more rolls to sandra's point, not just that they last longer but they have more rolls but at the same time, adam sandler, i love him, about by it is amazing to me is making more than a julia roberts acting for how long? angelina jolie acting from young age. >> angelina jolie opens up with ma "liffey" sent. she is a big star. if someone wants to set you up with mark, scott, liam, just say no. they are most likely to cheat on you and we'll be explaining why you need to pay extra attention to a dude's name.

>> okay, dom. okay, listen up! i'm re-workin' the menu.

mayo? corn dogs? you are so outta here! aah! [ female announcer ] the complete balanced nutrition of great-tasting ensure. 24 vitamins and minerals, antioxidants, and 9 grams of protein. [ bottle ] ensure®. nutrition inharge™. [ bottle ] ensure®. ugh. heartburn. did someone say burn? try alka seltzer reliefchews. they work just as fast and are proven to taste better than tums smoothies assorted fruit. mmm. amazing. yeah, i get that a lot. alka seltzer heartburn reliefchews. enjoy the relief.

>> >> >>

♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ well, if you are need a guy named ryan, mark or matt be wear. he may be getting something on

the side. guys with those names are most likely to cheat on you. this happeneds of women were asked about their experience and behold, a list of unfaithful names were discovered. scott, mark, and matthew. is your bo's name there? >> oh, my god. >> they are bibliical names, too. that is creepy. >> old and new testament in question with this one. sandra? >> you know,domminec i would question that. >> only for what he said. >> look at the top step names and top bon hundred names of commonly used boy's names in the country. >> and that is not even their real names anyway.

>> what is the respective hebrew. and what do you think? yeah, i anyhow a guy named scott. nsteve, comes to moind. wasn't that number seven. >> and i don't believe it is all in a name. it is just happenstance. if that was the name, he would be named two- faced. >> you think men are born -- >> i am sorry, i think it is men and women out there, i think. >> women cheat, too >> men are more to do it and what their role was originally supposed to be. >> men and women cheat roughly the same amount. men say that to comfort themselves that the woman is cheating on them. and we are bad boys and wired this way and my wife is pining

away for me. >> no matter whatdom said, it sounds sweet with the accent. >> you want to choke him. nscott, mark, and matt and we'll see you back here tomorrow. happening now. we begin on a fox news alert. law makers accuse veteran affairs apartment. and they investigate the growing scandal in treatment of va hospitals. and we are waiting to hear from minority nancy pelosi a day after appointing five democrats to the committee on benghazi. are the democrats ready to pitch in with that investigation? >> the u.s. taking to the skies and using a drone as the search expands for a number of school girls in algerria. we'll have the latest