tomorrow night, the rest of my interview. how close was tow obama? have they spoken since mr. obama became president and what would it cause them to bomb america again? i'm megan kelly, this is "the kelly file." >> welcome to "hannity" this is a fox news alert. the supreme court of the united states delivered a major blow to president obama's health care law today in a major victory for religious freedom. in a 5-4 decision, the justices ruled in favor of the hobby lobby craft chain saying that closely held corporations can in fact opt out of the obamacare contraception mandate due to religious objections. the decision marks the first time the supreme court ruled that profit seeking businesses can in fact hold religious views under federal law. fox's own shannon breen is in washington tonight with the details. shannon? >> sean in, that opinion, the supreme court sided with the religious family owners of two

for profit corporations, holding that the religious freedom restoration act protects them from forced compliance with the government edict the family says in in conflict with their religious convictions. for more than a year and a half, green family, the founders and owners of the hobby lobby croft store chain is fighting this mandate stemming from the hk law. a federal regulation that would force them to provide employees cost free access to 20 different forms of contraception, including four methods, the green family believe can trig area borgs, something they refuse to do. but that refusal could result in fines in the range of $475 million a year. justice samuel alito said this, "we hold that regulations that impose this obligation violate rifra which prohibits the federal government from taking any action that substantially burdens the exercise of religion unless it is the least restricting means of government

interest." today the co-founder barbara green said her family was overjoyed. the court's decision is a victory for our family business and all those who seek to live out their faith. the court got it all wrong. "in a decision of starling breadth, the court holds that commercial enterprises including corporations and partnerships and sole proprietorships can opt out of any law. they judge incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs." both the white house and democratic members of congress are vowing to take action in response to today's upon. one of the first proposals comes from democratic senator dick dur bin who wants to require corporation that's limit contraceptive choices to be forced to disclose that to all employees and anybody that applies at the job as well. >> shannon in washington, thank you so much. we'll have more on the hobby lobby decision in a few moments. also breaking tonight, the sunni militant group that is taking

control of large parts of iraq and syria has declared the establi establishment of an islamic state. now in an audio tape posted online a spokesman for the group announced that the leader would hold spiritual and political authority from syria to northeastern iraq. we turn to jennifer griffin. she is standing by at the pentagon. jennifer? >> sean, other groups are calling the declaration dilutional. sunni extremists celebrated in syria after the fighters announced they were changing their name-dropping references to iraq, syria or the wider region to simply the islamic state. demanding that all muslims worldwide express their loyalty, "the official name is the islamic state from the date of this declaration." the shadowy leader who was released from prison in iraq and u.s. troops were preparing to leave iraq was declared the

leader reminiscent of the mohammed 1400 years ago and often referred to by osama bin laden himself. this foreign fighter from chile taunted the u.s. and others. >> this is not the first order we break. we'll break all the borders. >> middle east experts say they should not play into the propaganda by referring it to as the islamic state. >> we should still call them what they are. we shouldn't somehow give legitimacy to a name which they're giving thimselves. >> meantime, u.s. intelligence agencies are weighing whether to ask foreign partners to increase security at airports overseas in the wake of reports that al qaeda link r linked fighters in syria teamed up with bomb makers in yes, ma'am to yemen to sneak a new bomb on to airlines. sean? >> the suspect charged in the 2012 benghazi terror attack that

left four americans dead pleaded not guilty during his first appearance in a federal court in washington on saturday. now fox's own catherine herridge is standing by tonight. >> i was sitting 25 feet from the benghazi suspect when he plead not guilty to a single count of facilitating a terrorist attack. during his brief appearance with a court appointed public defender, he initially seemed dazes. then he became laser like in his focus hanging on the judge's every word. it took 21 months to capture him. >> it was a pretty good indication that the united states of america and certainly this president doesn't forget. and if this is something we're focused on and determined to bring to justice those who are responsible for taking the lives of four brave americans. >> but a leading republican accused the administration of wasting time by letting him remain free for nearly two years after the attack. well, he gave multiple media

interviews. >> now we're finding out that the reason why he wasn't apprehended as quickly is because we were so focused on building a criminal case rather than capturing the suspects who were responsible for the attacking benghazi and killing our u.s. ambassador and three others. >> we're also learning more about the interrogation onboard the uss new york. the u.s. officials describing the benghazi suspect as compliant but not forthcoming providing details but not enough that intelligence could be immediately acted on. u.s. officials say there will be more charges soon, critics say that when a full readout from the administration about his detention and what point he was read miranda rights and stopped talking. sean? >> now we'll have the mother of one of the benghazi victims tonight. also breaking, president obama delivered remarks on immigration reform at the white house this afternoon and announced his intention to take executive action yet once again to pass some aspects of immigration

reform. now because he's doing so, waiting for house republicans and he's done waiting for them to act. fox's own wendell goaler is standing by. he has the latest. >> sean, the announcement came today after john boehner told the president on friday that house won't pass comprehensive immigration reform this year. boehner said he can't trust mr. obama to enforce the law. the president says his hand is being forced by tens of thousands of unaccompanied children turning up at the border to escape violence in honduras, guatemala and el salvador based on their parents' belief they won't be sent home. >> the children who are fortunate enough to survive it will be taken care of while they go through the legal process. but if most cases that, process will lead to them being sent back home. >> actually, in most cases, the kids have placed with relatives here in the united states and never show up for their deportation hearings. the president wants authority to money to process the kids more

quickly and authority to send them back home quickly. 2008 law allows kids to be quickly deported if they're from mexico but not if they're from central america. >> joining me with more on the monumental supreme court decision in favor of the company hobby lobby and against obamacare, we have senior counsel, hannah smith is us with. and from the american center for law and justice, jay seculo. let's get reaction. a big victory. by any objective measure for religious freedom today? >> it was a great day. both for hobby lobby, for the beckett fund and religious freedom. >> well, explain why in your opinion, look, a-4 decision is still a 5-4 decision, very close. the arguments of the majority were solid. that is your religious freedom doesn't end just because you're part of a corporation. >> well, that's exactly right. and the majority opinion written by justice alito joined by the four conservative justices said that just because a family opens up a business, they don't lose

their religious freedom rights. and that religious freedom restoration act protects them when they open up this family business. >> were you hoping for perhaps a wider interpretation that would have xenlded to any corporation? >> you know what? we actually got a great opinion today. justice alito's opinion was excellent on all the major points. you know, he said not only do the family owned businesses have religious freedom rights, but this is a substantial burden that the government placed on them by assessing them these huge fines if they with the mandate. so he said they have a substantial burden. and then he went on to say, you know, but government probably has a compelling governmental interest here. but they could have achieved this in such different ways than going about trying to force these religious objectors to pay for this mandate. so they said there was a less restrictive means of accomplishing this goal and because there was a less restrictive means, this mandate just simply cannot stand. >> you know, if you look at the three decisions, jay, if we go back to the recess appointment

decision last week and harris versus quinn about union members not having to pay dues in this particular pace that when it covers, you know, unions cost that, is a big ruling today in the hobby lobby case. the three things you think they have in common or the common thread here is that government has gone too far. that this is about government overreach, about separation of powers, co-equal branches of government and a president that doesn't seem to put a lot of stock in what is constitutional limits are. >> you know, the president's theme was yes, we can. the supreme court said today, no, you can't. and they said that last week as well. sean, you're correct. this is really the common theme here is governmental overreach. a president operating the idea that he cannot only be president executive but also legislator. he doesn't get to do that. you look at the case involving the challenge to the recess appointments. that was a huge case last week. we represented the speaker of

the house in that case. it was their job to determine when they recess, not the president. they rebuked the president's overreach on that one. you take a look at the union case you mention today. people need to understand, obviously the hobby lobby case was a gigantic victory. it overshadowed the labor case. a woman's mother taking care of her child at home against a small state subsidy constituted a state employee only for the purposes of union agency fees. and the supreme court there said, no. you don't get to do that. and this -- go ahead. >> let me ask you about this. between the recess appointments, changes to his own signature bill, obamacare without going back to congress not enforcing immigration law, eliminating work requirements for welfare, you can't do these things unilaterally. now john boehner is taking it a step further. he is suing the president. i would argue he may not have standing. they have constitutional authority not to fund these

things. but there seems to be a consensus here from the court that this president is not living up to his oath as it relates to the law and the constitution. >> i think that's exactly correct. what the speaker is talking about is a president that said he's going to operate by pen and phone. and that's not the way the constitution is set up. you're right, there is a legal question regarding standing. that is going to be something that courts have to decide. but the merits of the case, the principle of what the speaker is talking about is this consistent pattern of government overreach. you know, can you look at the irs scandals and it's a common theme. they overreach, they get caught, they pull back a little bit. then they move it forward. in this hobby lobby case, i don't think they have any room. it's a big win for religious freedom. the same thing tfor the union case. but the president was checkmated to day. >> you know what else i have to say? you know, they're still waging a war on the nuns, the little sisters of the core are still being fought by the government in the lower courts.

so this war is not over. we still have to win these nonprofit oka cases. >> coming up next here on "hannity" -- >> we have to use as was said this morning the prices that some view as a crisis. it does have crisis qualities as an opportunity. >> nancy pelosi calling the influx of illegal children crossing our southern border an opportunity. our panel will weigh in. later, former new york city mayor rudy giuliani reacts to the situation in iraq, ann coulter and much more. try dulcolax laxative tablets. dulcolax is comfort-coated for gentle, over-night relief. dulcolax. predictable over-night relief you can count on.

are the largest targets in the world, for every hacker, crook and nuisance in the world. but systems policed by hp's cyber security team are constantly monitored for threats. outside and in. that's why hp reports and helps neutralize more intrusions than anyone... in the world. if hp security solutions can help keep the world's largest organizations safe, they can keep yours safe, too. make it matter. to build something smarter. ♪ some come here to build something stronger. others come to build something faster... something safer... something greener. something the whole world can share. people come to boeing to do many different things. but it's always about the very thing we do best.

♪

in a major defeat for president obama and his health care law and majority victory for religious freedom, the supreme court ruled in favor of hobby lobby and decided that the closely held corporation cannot be forced to provide free contraception for employees. so the question is, is this the beginning of the end for obamacare? what is the impact of all this? here with reaction, serius /xmablist and father jonathan morris. by the way, the sisters of the poor are not off the hook yet. they still have a caseworking through the courts.

rick, tease are two men of conscience and principle and deeply held religious views. i have deeply held. i think you do. >> yeah. >> why should an institution, be it a workplace, charities, why should they be forced to do something like this? >> it depends on what kind of institution it is. by the way, i like you had to say i'm a liberal. that means it's not perfectly clear all the time. that's progress in my mind. >> that was me making fun of you. >> i know. >> in a fun way. >> progress. here's what's fascinating about this. i think it's absolutely appropriate for the court to give the broadest possible interpretation to religious rights for individuals. because that's how the constitution was written. not for legal fictions and that's what corporations are. it's a piece of paper that sits in a file cabinet in their office. >> but they're people too. >> not the entity itself are not. there are people that work there. there are people that run them. but they're not people. this is my concern. >> let me get the legal opinion and then the moral. >> they still have to go

together. >> the legal opinion, you're wrong on that. >>, no i'm not. >> person includes corporations. the supreme court looked at the statute and they said that there was a compelling state interest to give away, to make this company buy these abortive fashions. but at the same time, it was wrong that they couldn't impose their will on the owners of this company. and so 5-4 they decided and said, yeah, religion does count. >> would it count in general motors? >> it doesn't in this case. >> you're saying the statute says that. does that apply to general motors? >> they didn't ask that. >> i'm showing his example and showing where that doesn't hold up. if you put this thin membrane between the owners of this corporation because it's a one family and a close corporation, does that not koupt? >> sean, when i read the decision, i thought to myself, aa(ápunbelievable that only five

of the nine recognized that our constitution makes it very clear that we have religious liberty and in this case based on the legislation that we have in the religious liberty -- >> by the way, there is not in the health care law. >> no. >> this is the health and human services secretary mandate. >> the constitution, great american experiment placed religious liberty at the forefront. and here the court thank god said you cannot put a substantial burden on somebody who has a religious objection to a -- >> i think we have to understand this law goes back to 1993. written by democrats, passed by democrats, signed by bill clinton, a recognition then that religion as a first amendment means everything in this country. so you can talk about gm, you can talk about ford, we're going to talk about this case where this company was facing half a

billion dollars in fines. were they substantially burdened in the free exercise of religion? you have to agree this family -- >> answer that question. were they substantially burdened? >> were they substantially burdened as a corporation, they would have been. wait. wait. wait. did the founders care about that burden? >> that's not the argument. >> the argument is, and you know it, there's a statute that says this is against the law. >> why? >> the supreme court said, yes, you're right. this is against the law. >> why is it that strict constitutionalists always want to ignore the constitution when it doesn't work for them? >> i wish we had more time. we're out of time. >> no, we just got started! >> we could do this all night. >> so easy to go to gm. this family had religious beliefs. and the government should not be compelling them. >> well said. >> father morrimorris? >> if people want to implore

them, i agree. >> we have to go. coming up, the mother of one of the men killed in the benghazi terror attack joins us to react to the suspect now being held in our nation's capital is going to get literally a court hearing like an american citizen. plus, rudy giuliani is here to react to the growing crisis in iraq. later on tonight, ann colter is here and explain her world cup comments that literally landed her in hot water. ♪ they lived.

♪ they lived. ♪ they lived. ♪ (dad) we lived... thanks to our subaru. ♪ (announcer) love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru.

the suspected ringleader of the benghazi terror attack plead not guilty in federal court over the weekend. why is the man allegedly behind the death of four brave americans being tried in a u.s. court and not at gitmo? joining me is pat smith, she lost her son sean killed in that attack. pat, welcome back. i appreciate you being here. i know how tough this for you. this keeps coming up. here's my first question to you, for 21 months reuters, "the time of london," "the new york times," cnn and fox news interviewed this guy in broad daylight in public. if they can find him, are you angry that it took so long for our government to find him? >> well, it seems that that's what happened when the government gets involved. they don't do anything. they talk a lot. they didn't do anything.

they tell you everything that they're going to do if they ever catch somebody. but that never happens. this guy should be in gitmo and he should stay there. >> what do you think of a guy that is a terrorist that killed your son not an american citizen but he's going to be tried in an american court? that's part of this that makes no sense to me. want to get your take. >> you want me to push a button, i'll push a button on that one. >> go ahead, please. >> okay. i think that this guy should be in gitmo. i think he should be tried and after he is convicted then he should be put to death at gitmo. and i'll push the button. >> you've been very critical on hillary on this one. >> oh, yes. >> what is your reaction? explain. >> i believe that hillary was in charge of all of this stuff and she did nothing that she would admit to to stop it from happening. my son is dead because of

hillary. and she has not taken the time nor the energy or anything to talk to me. she will not talk to me. i have not part of the immediate family according to her. the only thing she tall to is how much money she doesn't have. >> how could -- how could she say -- you're the mother of this young man. how can she argue that you're not part of the immediate family? >> that's what they've been telling me all along. i've been asking that same question. >> you weren't able to go -- >> remember they didn't invite you -- >> i remember the labor pain. every one of them. >> yeah. but i remember you weren't even invited to dc at that point and we invited you as our guest. >> you're exactly correct. you're the only one that cared enough to do anything about it. they wouldn't even answer me as to why i can't come. >> all right. pat, i'm sorry. i want to get to the bottom of this as you do. and this guy, you're right, should get the death penalty. thank you for being with us. good to see you again. thank you. >> thank you, sean.

>> and meanwhile, as we reported earlier to night, the sunni militant group isis is establishing a islamic name and they made this video mocking america. [ inaudible ] >> how much money america spends to fight islam. [ inaudible ] >> here with reaction, former new york city mayor rudy giuliani. one of the things that defined your time as mayor any night, 3:00 in the morning, 4:00 in the morning, if you heard a firearm or policeman were hurt, you got out of bed. >> absolutely. >> every night. >> the rule was you'll never get

in trouble by waking me up. you'll get in a lot of trouble if you fail to notify me something going on. >> you go to the hospital? >> or to a hostage situation or if it was a derailment or airplane crash. it was my job to make sure that all the different emergency apparatus were working together correctly. >> it's heartbreaking to hear this woman talk. >> it's my responsibility that people elected me to do that. >> it's heartbreaking to hear her say they don't contact her. >> we don't know where the president was that night. >> we still don't know. >> we have no idea what he was doing that night. >> what is your reaction? fox, cnn, reuters, times of london, "new york times," they're meeting with him in hotels -- >> my investigation to this entire investigation is shock. we never examined the crime scene. now we're treating it like kranl case. we didn't treat it like kranl case at the start. took us weeks to get there. took us months, months over a year now to capture the person who is responsible for it.

to try this in the criminal justice system is absurd. this was an act of war. this was an attack on our ambassador, on our people as part of a war against us. it should be treated that way. these people are -- this guy is a military prisoners. >> how is somebody that is a terrorist that is not a citizen get into the federal court system? >> there is also the fact that we haven't utilized what we could get out of this guy. in term of being able to get really good intelligence from these people, we've interrogated them for very short period of time. we should be interrogating them for four months, five months, six months. >> breaking him. >> get everything out of him we can get. >> why? >> to save other lives. i mean to get the kind of intelligence we need to stop these things from happening in the future. >> the broader question is as we watch city after city in iraq fall now, you saw the three israeli kids that were kidnapped and killed and you see the expansion of this group right

through a syria into iraq and literally every gain america made in that battle is now falling. >> it will completely, completely given back by the president and joe biden. >> are they mocking america? >> when he took over, when president obama or joe biden took over, they had an iraq where the surge was working. they had an iraq in which if we made the commitment to leave troops behind and not just 10,000, that was an absurd number. it should have been 25,000, 30,000, he spla to tell the american people something they didn't want to hear. but that's what presidents have to do. >> wouldn't it be intelligence providing, training we would offer? as soon as we left, all the intelligence died. >> also we backed maliki and joe biden did that. that was a critical, crucial mistake. maliki works for iran. i knew that. i think -- i told you that three years ago. >> i think you did. >> there is no question he has been working from iran from the very beginning. he lives in iran. it took a genius to figure out

he's going to work for iran. he lived in iran. he is very, very close to the ayatollah. i know of people that he's had killed at the behest of the eye rain yn regime. 40, 50 people that were iraqi -- a rhi iranian patriots that he had killed. what he is doing to the sunnis is war crime. >> the rise of radical islamist and this islamic state, dick cheney said we might have a worse attack than we had on 9/11/2001 within ten years in the united states. why don't i think that prediction is far off because of this rise? >> the president is letting him run out of control. syria run out of control. he left the vacuum, al qaeda moves into that vacuum. he let iraq run out of control and isis and al qaeda moved into that vacuum. when you leave vacuums like this, and you're not getting the proper intelligence, then the -- that's when the unpredictable

happens. i think the vice president is very correct to be worried about it. >> coming up next here on "hannity" -- >> who do you think should win this year for best rapper at this year's b.e.t. awards? >> wow, i don't know. i don't know, maybe eminem. >> america's border control and you saw chris rock. he went to a monster truck rally to see if they were excited to see last night's b.e.t. awards. we'll respond to both of those. later, the always outspoken ann coulter here to defend her column that, well, got everybody all worked up about soccer. also get her take on the immigration issue straight ahead. comes without a prescription for frequent heartburn. get complete protection. nexium level protection.

cozy or cool? exactly the way you want it ... until boom, it's bedtime! your mattress is a battleground of thwarted desire. enter the sleep number bed. right now, you can save $400 on the all-new c4 mattress set. he's the softy. his sleep number setting is 35. you're the rock, at 60. and snoring? sleep number's even got an adjustment for that. you can only find sleep number at a

sleep number store. don't miss the lowest prices of the season with the all-new c4 mattress at $1499.98. know better sleep with sleep number.

test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test

. today i'm beginning a new effort to fix the immigration system on my own without congress. as a first step, i'm directing the director of homeland security and the attorney

general to move appropriate resources from the interior to the border. >> all right. there is the president earlier today once again threatening to use executive action, this time when it comes to immigration reform. here with reaction is tom, outnumbered co-host and fox news contributor cameron holder. you passed the bar? >> first time. >> we have a constitution. >> we do. >> and it's our rule of law. >> yes. >> and there is something called separation of powers. >> yes. >> and co-equal branches of government. and the supreme court is just slapped this president down on a number of issues in the last three days, right? >> what's your point, sean? >> my point is why doesn't the president accept that congress didn't want the law and trying to back door something once again because he doesn't care about the constitution? >> no, who doesn't care about the constitution is somebody like boehner who just decides not to do his job and not to do anything whatsoever. >> excuse me. john baner is under no obligation. wait a minute, he is under no constitutional obligation

whatsoever to go with obama's law. none. >> he is an employee of our country. he is a public service employee. correct? >> what is his constitutional obligation? what has he not carried out? >> he turned everything down. we have a humanitarian crisis at the border. >> who's fault is that? obama. >> do you believe that ann coulter mentioned the fact that when she was on the judiciary committee -- >> she wasn't on the judiciary committee -- >> when she worked for the judiciary committee, 4% were deported. this is an issue that is going on for decades. republicans keep turning things down because republicans want prioritize border security. every time they come to the table and say border security first, democrats say, no, sorry. we want a comprehensive package. you don't get a comprehensive package until we sol the problem of border security otherwise this is going to happen over and over again. >> it's about the hobby lobby

case an recess appointments and every other scam thm president has no respect for co-equal branches of government or separation of powers. >> well, why do we have to have comprehensive -- why is that the solution? i don't understand what is so good. what has ever been good about comprehensive anything? why not do things a little bit at a time. >> all right. let me ask this. you're the liberal here. >> i'm also a lawyer. >> hey lawyer. >> you mentioned the fact that there is a separation of power. >> by the way, the president made a conscience decision not tone force the current law. why not say this is hurting our educational system, health care system, criminal justice system. we can't afford to give them all attorneys? why don't you agree with us, control the border first and then deal with other issues. >> i believe that we have a humanitarian crisis. >> will you support controlling the border first? >> absolutely. first compared to everything else?

we wouldn't have a humanitarian cross-ice fis border security had been prioritized already. so we would be having a different discussion about what to do with the people here. we cannot even get to that point. >> i'm glad you're on the substantive issues. i watch you on "outnumbered" and you were talking about fixing it the other day. >> you have to come by. that's all i'm saying. >> do you gr we that? >> on immigration, i don't understand why i'm such a meany. i think we shouldn't allow illegal immigrants in the country and i don't think we should allow them to have citizenship. is that craze i >> the other issue, though -- >> i want to show you this. this is chris rock literally, pretty hail airous. he goes to a monster truck rally and ask what they think about b.e.t., black entertainment television. >> you are looking forward to this year's b.e.t. awards? >> b.e.t. awards? >> yeah, the b.e.t. awards. >> i don't know which ones -- which awards that is?

. >> you are familiar with this gentleman right here? >> he looks like mr. t. >> he looks like mr. t. who do you think should win for best rapper at this year's b.e.t. awards? >> wow. i don't know. i don't know. maybe eminem. >> do you think mikiel more should win a b.e.t. award? >> black entertainment television, i don't know if he can be nominated. >> you have ever dated a black woman? >> oh, i wish. >> had a is funny. >> yeah. >> i love it. i love it. i don't know why everybody's so upset about this. it's like you going to harvard and asking them if they're familiar with your work. they're not going to be familiar with your work. >> why not? >> monster truck people are not familiar with b.e.t. >> harvard are doing entire classes on this. >> is anyone really upset about

that video? i think everyone loves it. >> i think there are racist comments. >> how about that? chris rock is free. chris rock, you know, even bill mahr, i want every comedian to be able to cross every line, tell every joke, even if it's a joke about irish people. >> so you love it? >> yes. >> this is a first time that you're in favor of a black man making fun of white people? >> i always love chris rock. >> he is really supporting that. >> george lopez is funny. he uses racial humor. i'm not the sensitive one. you liberal are the pc people, not me. >> there is nothing wrong with it. >> a conservative did it, then we would have an answer, right? >> it is true. but that's exactly right. all right. we have to run. good to see you guys. >> good to see you. >> i lot of show. coming up coulter is taking a lot of heat from her opinion on soccer fever and we'll get her response from the

president's immigration speech. [bell rings] this...is jane. her long day on set starts with shoulder pain... ...and a choice take 6 tylenol in a day which is 2 aleve for... ...all day relief. hmm. [bell ring] "roll sound!" "action!"

the numbers are impressive.y to new york state. over 400,000 new private sector jobs... making new york state number two in the nation in new private sector job creation... with 10 regional development strategies to fit your business needs. and now it's even better because they've introduced startup new york... with the state creating dozens of tax-free zones where businesses pay no taxes for ten years. become the next business to discover the new new york. [ male announcer ] see if your business qualifies.

welcome back. the world cup is in full swing and ann coulter is making waves after taking aim at america's recent toker craze titled

"america's favorite national pastime hating soccer." ann coulter slam the sport asking do they even have mvps in soccer? everyone just runs up and down the field and every once in a while the ball descentally goes in and the soccer craze is due to immigrants saying, i promise you no american's great grandfather born here is watching soccer. joining us now from -- you're not immigrating to france, are you? >> no. but we're all worrying about what's going to happen in the big germany-algeria game. i'm right outside a part of town that is lined with cops. and the russia-algeria game ended with a 1-1 tie and they are all rioting out here. yes. really thrilling game. and my critics have apparently tried to persuade me that soccer is a macho game by throwing one

week of hissy fits over my column. >> i've been following it on social media. it's actually very entertaining. you really struck a cord here. i'm not a big but, receipt me move on. because immigration proponents of this. the president spoke on immigration today and says, oh, congress doesn't do what i want them i'm going to pass am nesty. i wanted to get your reaction to it. >> i'm glad you asked me this, because i'm out of the country and i'm terrified congress will fall for this. there is no way obama is using his executive authority in the middle of a surge on the border. what i'm worried about is that he'll go to congress and ask for

unlimited discretion to deal with the problem. we do need to change the law if you're from someplace other than mexico you don't get invited in and given clean diapers a place to stay, and you know, flown around the country to complete the criminal conspiracy of human smuggling as an illegal alien. this problem is out of conference. we need a fence on the border. >> look at the impact it's having on our health care system, educational system. now, eric holder is going to provide all of the people giving them what? government-paid lawyers? now, we're going to pay legal fees the amount of money, do you think this is planned on their part? this is like make it happen? create chaos? then, oh, blame the other guy? >> oh, absolutely. and not even necessary to blame the other guy. but just get them here like 11

million illegal immigrants then, we can have marco rubio saying what are you going to do? deport them all? just get them in. in a matter of years they'll be voting democrat, selecting welfare, unfortunately, the country cannot afford it. we have our own poor people we need to take care of we're running out of money for that. as i pointed out many times, peop people hurt the most are african americans they're the one that's need low-wage jobs being under cut and subsidized through welfare illegal immigrants and low-wage immigrants are taking. second group are legal hispanic immigrants. this hurts low-wage americans, republicans is the party that cares about all americans not just very wealthy or very, very poor. >> may shock you but washington

examiner had a piece that said 90% get court dates, get released then, they don't show up for court dates. no. i know. >> go ahead. >> when i worked for senate judiciary committee this was my issue. it was for immigrants coming to this country and commit felonies, they're convicted and convictions are upheld the law said they're supposed to serve time, then being deported at that time they were deported at 4% a year. after the hearings it's a decade in the united states. at which point they've married saying but i have an american spouse, an american child well, that is because you've been living here. this is why you're right. obama just wants to get them in, just get them in. it's like 90,000 they're

expecting this year. 140,000 illegal immigrants just pouring across the border next year? it's out of control. to help all americans what we need is an immigration moratorium, both legal and illegal. >> do many people recognize -- >> then, no americans will be watching soccer. >> do many people in france recognize you? >> americans do. they agree with me on soccer! >> i agree with you on soccer and immigration. >> coulter, god bless you. thank you, travel safe >> good talking to you sean, >> more hannity right after the break. stay with us. i'm j-a-n-e and i have copd.

i'm d-a-v-e and i have copd. i'm k-a-t-e and i have copd, but i don't want my breathing problems to get in the way my volunteering. that's why i asked my doctor about b-r-e-o. once-daily breo ellipta helps increase airflow from the lungs for a full 24 hours. and breo helps reduce symptom flare-ups that last several days and require oral steroids, antibiotics, or hospital stay. breo is not for asthma. breo contains a type of medicine that increases risk of death in people with asthma. it is not known if this risk is increased in copd. breo won't replace rescue inhalers for sudden copd symptoms and should not be used more than once a day. breo may increase your risk of pneumonia, thrush, osteoporosis, and some eye problems.

tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking breo. ask your doctor about b-r-e-o for copd. first prescription free at mybreo.com what wthat's never really being able tbeen possible.fair price. but along comes a radically new way to buy a car called truecar. now it is. truecar has pricing data on every make and model, so all you have to do is search for the car you want... there it is. now you're an expert in less than a minute. this is how car buying was always meant to be. this is truecar. cozy or cool? exactly the way you want it ... until boom, it's bedtime! your mattress is a battleground of thwarted desire. enter the sleep number bed. right now, you can save $400 on the all-new c4 mattress set. he's the softy. his sleep number setting is 35. you're the rock, at 60. and snoring? sleep number's even got an adjustment for that.

you can only find sleep number at a sleep number store. don't miss the lowest prices of the season with the all-new c4 mattress at $1499.98. know better sleep with sleep number.

even at a distance of 10 miles... the length of 146 football fields. they can see the light of a single candle. your eyes are amazing. look after them with centrum silver. multivitamins to help support your eyes, heart and brain. centrum silver. for the most amazing parts of you. now, with a new easy to swallow coating. >> that is all the time we have left this evening. before we go, we hope you'll set

your dvr and start your day with fox and friends each weekday morning 5:00 to 9:00. thank you for being with us we'll see you, back here, tomorrow night. >> today, i will be getting a new effort to fix as much of our immigration system as i can on my own. without congress. >> president obama realizing he has a disaster on the border. now trying to fix the immigration problem himself. is that even possible? we'll have a special report. >> the context is all out assaulted on contraception production services. >> liberal precincts as the supreme court sides with traditional americans allowing some to opt out of funding some kinds of birth control. analyze. >> do you know why i'm really here? >> i can't