>> thank you for joining us. > on buzzr fourth weekend. >> from new york this sunday, president obama blaming the media for blaming substance. >> if you want the news, you say, washington is a mess and the bake attitude is everything is just crazy up there. >> is he using the media as a scapegoat for the problems and the paralysis? >> monica lewinsky in the first television interview blames the media in part for humiliating her after the affair with bill clinton. >> to be called stupid and ditzy, it was excruciating. >> did the press file on and

should news organizations care as hillary clinton eyes the white house? >> the press has no trouble pounding president bush. is the briefing room different under president obama? >> we have a tale of two administrations. >> facebook manipulates the mood of the users by changing the information they are fed online. why did zuckerberg think this was ethical? >> this is "media buzz." >> president obama sure seems frustrating selling reporters he is serious traitsed with congress but nature moving on immigration and will take action by executive order and frustrated with the media saying news organizations are not reporting on the subjectsive things he is trying to accomplish. >> when washington sometimes

seems tone deaf to what is going on in people's lives and around the kitchen table, there is going to be someone who will stand up for you and your family and i want you to know that, you don't see it on tv sometimes, it is not what the press and the pundits talk about. >> why does he take on the press and the pundits in i have fox news contributor and a firm "usa today" executive who hosts social buzz and editor of "national review," and contributor and special correspondent and contributor to the daily beast. >> why does president obama bang on the media? >> this guy can snap his fingers and reporters come running to his house and he can say anything he wants to say and it will be carried nationwide. it is not the messenger. it is the person who is delivering the message that is the problem. >> the press pays house calls if you live at 1600 pennsylvania.

>> does the president have a point saying the media recovers politics over policy and is distracted. >> of course and there is substance, covered and the press would be delighted if he held a ream news conference discussing whatever the substantive issues are. this is the take he has had on the media, a certain contempt and there is an irony because he would never be president of the united states if he were not a media phenomenon. >> you are saying he is not grateful. >> he is an ingrate. i'm on the record. >> kelly, the v.a. scandal, the missing i.r.s. e-mails the handling of the bowe bergdahl controversy and the mess in iraq, that is not exactly the media's fault. >> for someone who covered kill -- kardashian's wedding and the royal wedding i am nauseated

that we don't cover the news. but he is right, all of us are guilty of this. all of us are guilty of covering whether a potential not candidate has restraining orders or messy personal life. >> what about him blaming the press, a guy who has gotten tremendous press certainly for the first several years of the presidency and the two campaigns. >> there is enough blame to go around. is he fine with the fact that the coverage isn't substantive talking about how gorgeous his wife looks like on the cover of "vogue," magazine? probably but it is not just the press but he does not like to watch tv and he would like to see policy covered. >> european any, on trip where he launched an attack on the press, the team takes effort to arrange the photo ops at a hamburger joint and him buying an ice cream joint and a woman write as letter about her

financial struggles and what do they give her? a photo op with the president because that is what the media will cover and they want the media to cover it. >> this is something that all of us have struggled with, the sneaking the kids' vegetables making it look like candy. if there was no photo op it is less likely it would be covered. ought press like as sugary hug? or hamburger. >> cannot have it both ways. you can that manipulate the media by sitting down on one hand and then saying they not covering the issues that are important to the white house. >> isn't this a guy would happens to be the president of the united states who has total access to the media and, therefore, can shape the narrative? >> of course. it is very easy for him because a last people what used to work for him are now in the media carrying his water. >> david axelrod? >> and stehpanie cutter is seen

going into the white house. it is in secret. that means he has allies in the media. >> when he has the anchors come to the white house? >> kate baldwin during the family values summit and asked questions that agreed with his policy. kate was harder on him than oh -- o'donnell. >> do you think the mainstream media, now, are disillusioned with the second term president obama? >> i think they are a little bit. look, the media does need news. the fact is he is just stuck. he doesn't have unified control of congress. there nothing new about the agenda and there is nothing new to cover. the complaints about the media are old, too, making these for years and years and years and the economic policies are the same, as well, and, on top of

all this, what is new is the scab dallas. >> this isn't just him, this is every president who says "i hate the media," but in this instance, it is not, it doesn't ring true. he came out --. >> he tried to make news. he has a rose garden news conference on immigration. what happened? >> he said, i will study it. >> but this reminds me of when i was invited to cover the women and girls initiative that was hosted by hillary clinton. i like to write about substantive policy issues on women and girls and i get there and the main news story is that chelsea announces she pregnant. that summit on women and girls would never have gotten international news coverage if she does not say she was pregnant. whose fault is that? >> it is not chelsea's fault. >> there is truth here. >> you have set me up for the next question which is, president obama is not the only person who is unhappy. only liberal democrat, hillary

clinton is continuing the book cover, with an interview with c-span and she said some of the coverage of her, she did not think some of the coverage was inaccurate. was she justified? >> as someone who what a not particularly flattering column, i say she has made some gaffes and missteps and she is used to being beaten up but it has been a while. she had a great come back, the come back kid and after seeing a lot of unflattering press for the first 20 years, if everyone sounded the drumbeat, she qualified and great and even those on the other side. she was caught off guard. >> she has hated the media for a long-term and she has contempt for the media and now she had this great run as the secretary of state and when you are out of office and you are not running for president, you are going to have more favorable ratings. it really made her mad when she

came out with a new book she was getting trashed. >> i on argue in four years up to the book tour she got the best coverage of her life and most of the negative coverage had to do with her own stem bells on the issue of her personal wealth. >> there are two big things, a media narrative opened you on her wealth something that will see all the way through 2016 if she runs, any gaffe, anything will be interpreted through that prism and a little bit of the way it happened in al gore as being an exaggerator. also, the media loves a horse race and she is such a formidable position, it is hillary clinton versus hillary clinton and the media will pick at everything because there is no other story. >> her getting in her way. >> and the other reason she was

thrown off guard is that the reaction on "the beast," is that the clinton brand is so associated with income inequality and you have liberals for the first time saying i am not comfortable with what she said and that was unexpected and driving haranguer. >> what does she think is inaccurate? over the years she has been in the public eye going back to first lady, things have been written, conspiracy theories carried in the media but, what she said when she was pressed about her evolution on same-sex marriage, that was not inaccurate. >> we last week talk about the fact there was a "washington post" story that had unnamed obama sources sprinkled throughout so it is not just inaccuracies. it is the way she is portrayed in the media. >> she trouble had better toughen up if she is going to run for president. to button up your point on the president if he is not making any news and he continues not to get much through congress, this is going to be...he will be

unhappy with the coverage. >> prepare for a lost whining the. >> we will go to break. send me a tweet about our show and well read the messages at the end of the program. >> monica lewinsky is back on television and blaming the media for her humilityization and dana perino and how white house coverage has changed since she,.

monica lewinski is back on the radars just weeks after discussing her affair with bill clinton. her interview with the national

geographic channel for a special on the 90s will air tonight. >> do be in the vortex of this media maelstrom was alarming and frightening. it was confusing. i think a lot, too, had to with the fact that i was a woman. >> monica lewinski justified in saying as we heard a moment ago the media ridiculed her as a slut, bimbo when she was just 23 years old? >> they did. but the bottom line is if you're caught in a sex scandal with the president of the united states especially when it's entangled in a legal matter that leads to his impeachment, there was going to be a lot of attention to that. the people that would rally to the defense of such a woman, the anyone insist left weren't interested in defensing her at all because they were more interested in protecting the president of the united states. >> and bill clinton --

>> right. and i had an exclusive interview with donna rice from the daily beast where i talked to her about this issue. one of the points she made was in her case, she was fortunate enough that gary hart just went away. bill clinton has not just gone away. but i constant help wondering how in terms of social media. today we have sexism media catch dogs when literally that's all they do online. i can't help but perhaps thinking monica would have faired better had they been around back then. >> i think it would have been worse. >> i think it would have been much worse. i think the amount of hate and anger that's on social media right now would have made it almost impossible for her to survive. she couldn't respond. she had a legal case. >> right. >> except that -- >> being prosecuted by ken star. this is all 1998. i remember a lot of people it's

ancient history. >> is this tabloid news? >> get off my lawn. i'm tired of monica. i thought it was great for her to give an interview to "vanity fair." i enjoyed reading and it seeing what she's done and i sympathize with her as a woman for how she was treated or portrayed, but -- >> but you don't want to hear from him any more. >> i don't. it's enough. go on, trying to make your life and stop whining. >> but the problem with that approach especially with hillary clinton gearing up and bill clinton would be back in the white house, other people are going to talk about it, so why should monica not get to be part of that conversation? >> look, i do think that perhaps we're getting better as a culture in some ways. lieu at eliot spitzer and anthony weiner. the women seemed to fair better than the men with -- >> no. completely -- >> because people don't remember their names in the way that

lewinski became -- >> eliot spitzer -- >> eliot spitzer got a tv show, mark sanford got elected to congress. >> but mark sanford stayed with the woman, now is going to go on and be his wife. and eliot spitzer, she's gone on to have a happy life. i'm not being funny. she has a happy life, she's raising her family. i think people called out the double standard in a way that never happened for lewinski and i think that's part of the problem. >> is this inevitably going to be part -- because everything in a presidential campaign, and it's obviously hillary clinton is not at fault for what happened. but is this something that will grate your -- >> everything about hillary clinton's record and her role in the scandal will be dredged up from beginning to end. we've already seen it happen. and it's hard to tell the counterfactuals what would happen if a male intern had been caught in an affair with the president because we'll have to wait for the second clinton

administration or just some administration for that. >> wow. >> predicting news. >> so are you going to stand by your i don't want to hear from her any more? >> i think she's made her point. she has come back and said this is what happened to me. this is how i feel about it. i don't like it. and she is trying to rehabilitate herself. i think she needs to go on and do that. >> but i think where we disagree is that i think she has the right to control for a narrative. >> i predict the media is completely -- from this subject since ice a long campaign. can he li goff, law lowery, nooiz nice to see you here in new york. after the break, facebook creates a experiment on thousands of users. but first, dana parino is up next.

day 19 got her share of scars with the bush administration. [ inaudible ] that is what we trying to document >> that doesn't answer the question? >> it does answer question. >> coverage of the obama white house looked very different as her post of "the five." we sat down in new york. >> dana, welcome. >> how different does the environment seem than when you were stand there? >> a last it is the same. you see a lot of different faces. when i was there, there were

journalists who covered self white houses including one of my very favorite, terry hunt and from reuters. >> same level of confrontation? >> well, probably not. if you were president obama's press secretary you would say "yes." if you were i, look, i was there to watch tony snow and scott mcclelland but it was a good back-and-forth, and snow loved to win a debate. my briefings tended to be more clinical. you ask the question, i will give you the answer. if why have it i move on and get you something by the end of the day. i tried to turn down the temperature in the briefing room a little bit. look, that was my style. some think it wasn't a good idea >> i much prefer t thing.

the press secretary is for the entire united states. you are not the spokesman for the republicans or the democrats. you are the advocate if the president but you also are an advocate for the press and their access. >> when you credit size the obama administration i sense more understanding, perhaps, sympathy, because you have dealt with the problems from the inside. >> what i found that is wonderful about having been a press secretary and there have not been that many, maybe 30, but the ones that are still here, and tony snow passed away, of course, but even before he died we have a nice fraternity of frees seconds because only you can understand what it was lick. now when i meet up with, say, robert gibs the first press secretary of president obama we have an amazing amount of empathy. i do try to have a legal bit of, maybe unhesitant to criticize because it is not in context and i don't know if it is fair but there are times when i think we

deserve the criticism or they do. >> interesting. >> when conservatives, some conservatives say the press is in the tank if president obama, if you look back at the last year after the rollout of oscar anguiano and the i.r.s. and bowe bergdahl and the mess in iraq, would you say the president right now is getting positive press? >> they probably don't see it as positive but i think it always looks like a velvet glove. an example, with the i.r.s., that is a horrible scandal for any white house. i believe if that were the bush administration every system head live would have been, bush did this, bush did that. with the obama administration, all the headlines are, the i.r.s. did this. they allow --. >> because there hasn't been proven links. >> it doesn't matter. >> during the bush administration anything the epa decided if it had to do with coal-fired power plants that was

a bush decision, so the subtle things that are biased i have come to expect. >> if journalists used a velvet glove against or for the obama white house what was used for the bush white house? >> spikes and nails but not in the briefing room itself. my opinion, the reporters if the briefing room were very professional, they worked very hard, and they had to try to be as fair as possible. i thought the briefing room reporters were very fair. i tell you when there was a huge difference, in 26 televison when the democrats took over the house and the not and congress changes and almost all of the energy and interest in the media when to capitol hill. that was new and different and they were fighting against the administration. that is when i noticed a big difference for president obama because the white house reporters had to fight for fairness for us, sometimes, not always, but i found the white house reporters to be very fair. >> with dick cheney and others

from your administration getting pounded now about the chaos in iraq, do you wish on some level that your ex boss would speak out? >> i understand it. this is a president who did not long for the light and doesn't want to be on stage and he has a tremendous amount of respect for the presidency itself and for rebound. one of thing i loved about him in the last two years we were asked are you worried about the legacy and he said, you know in my last year as president i read three biographies about george washington and if historians are still analyzing the first president, the 43rd doesn't have a lot to worry about. this is an argument he could be more like jimmy carter and criticize though who succeed him but i don't think that is very productive but i understand the desire. i would love to hear from him. privately. >> you are on the soft spoken side and i am not sure whether i

would have picked you to be doing televised combat on "the five." >> different role, for sure, and i would think when i was a spokesperson my opinion didn't matter. who care wad i thought, right? dana perino i was supposed to defend and advocate for the white house. >> it was a transition and i appreciate that fox news said give her a slot and i was shy at first to give my own opinion because i wasn't sure... >> then what happened? >> i met greg and everything changed also, i decided it was okay to have a career change and i didn't have to straddle the fence and what a freeing moment. >> the liberation of dana perino, thank you for joining us. >> next, matt lauer is slapped for asking the general motor can

balance her job with being a million? would a male get that question? is the love for soccer subsiding now in the united states with the united@w@wowowpg÷÷owúç÷gg

eastern for the weekend but, now, back to "media buzz." >> matt lauer has picked autopsy fuss with general motor c.e.o. mary barra over raising issues that would not be asked of a male executive the here is part of the original interview. he addressed the interview. >> you are a mom of two kids and you said your kids will hold you accountable for one job, being a million. >> correct. >> given the pressures of had job at general motors, can you do both well? >> i think i can. i have a great team. >> i felt it is not a gender issue but a human issue of work and life balance, a parenting issue, for men men, moms and fathers, question i ask myself

every single day. clearly, this touches a nerve. >> we have a contributor to "today" and anchor and a columnist. he says after asking marry bear this question because she inside an interview she missed her son's prom because of work. >> i am sure. but the rather wax was overwhelmingly negative because the implication for many is that a woman's job is to, first and for most be a mother and anythingance later is difficult for her to juggle career and motherhood. i do have to wonder if that question would have been asked of a male c.e.o. there have been male c.e.o.'s of g.m. for decades and i doubt many of them been asked how necessity juggled fatherhood and being the c.e.o. >> do you think the implication is that first and for most mary

barra is a mom opposed to the executive of an important auto company. >> was the question sexist? >> she brought it up in an interview. ing it was fair game. all that said, he is disengenerous and dishonest i say when say he would ask that of a male. >> thank you is a strong. >> i looked at the transcripts and we have evidence, and he has interviewed c.e.o.'s of chrysler, for, and are her predecessor at g.m. >> did they talk about their kids interviews? >> i didn't go back that far. all had at least three kids and he never asked a question about, can you be a good dad and a good c.e.o. >> here is why i think the criticism is unfair, as matt said in the follow-up segment, talking about martha stewart and other female c.e.o.'s, and i grapple with this, and matt lauer missed his son's 13th birthday because he was flying

around the world. in this day and age it is not only a question for women but that is how it is spun. >> it is not only a question for women but it is more often asked of female subjects than it of is males. what is the fundamental issue. make in mistake, it is an issue. the creator of "grey's anatomy," tweeted i have been up all night wondering if he can be a dad and be a job at the same time, and another said, come orange matt, you know better. time to stop asking these questions. zero tolerance for sexism. so the colleagues, female colleagues have a problem with the quote. clearly, it is an issue and it has struck a nerve and it will not go away. until male c.e.o.'s and male leaders are asked similar questions, then and only then will people feel comfortable with the idea of work and life balance being an issue for men and women. >> i think men should be asked similar questions but it is true

with two working parents usually when a child is sick a mom wants to go home despite the equality we hope for the women bear the child raising. >> thank you is changing. >> i have been called on more than one occasion, the nanny, and i try to trip what i can with my daughter. let me switch now on the remaining couple of minutes to soccer. we talked about the media soccer fever and people think it is overboard and now the united states team has lost to belgium, is the media dialing down? >> dialing down on ordering bell judgment waffles and the united states is out and people are still interested. i was out on tuesday at 4:00 and still a, would day and you could not fit a shoehorn where i was watching at the jersey shore. >> so it does not just need the

members it will? >> people are clearly still interested. i was at sak's 5 avenue and everyone was glued to the tv. >> there is a strain of criticism this is not really an american sport and it is un-american and only real americans are interested in soccer, football baseball and it is culture war. >> i don't think it is a culture war. it is a universal sport that anyone canbly. there is no barrier of entry because it doesn't cost a lot of money. you only need passion, feet, and something that resemble as ball and there you go. you have a game. >> nbc made a huge mistake aftery jobs was interested in the killing of trayvon martin but the court has therein out

the sound they edited the 9-1-1 call making it sound like he volunteered that trayvon martin was black when he was responding to a dispatcher's question, but, the florida court ruled that yod jobs has to be treat as a public figure and had to prove malice so nbc knew the report was false or recklessly disregarded when it was accurate. the judge noted that the network was saying george zimmerman is not a racist and he plans to appeal. >> after the break, the travel channel sidelines a star as hoof mounts a truly disgusting attack against women on instagram

anna richman is one of the travel channel's big stars, but the travel channel has yanked his show which was supposed to

debut this week. why? he revealed some insulting comments on instagram. richman fired back with a street term for a woman's gent talls. quote, if anyone acts like a blank, i'll call them one. it's not ma sojny, it's a spade calling a spade. he told another woman the only thing that was blanked up was your dad's choice to go without a condom. richman eventually apologized. did the travel channel have any choice here? >> they had no choice whatsoever. i guess you could say his career is cooked. it's a holiday weekend, come on. >> he's here all week. >> here is the bottom line, howie, that more and more of what we're seeing is that particularly reality tv stars don't have any media training. what they also need in that curriculum is social media training. and if they can't be responsible for the account, they should lose the account.

>> it's one thing to say dumb things on social media. but it's another thing to say such angry things to people. >> when you're seasoner and sober minded, that's when you should tweet. social media is a tool and unfortunately this stuff lives on forever. he's not only representing himself, he is representing the network and you cannot save these things. you cannot at all. it was a bad choice of words. that said, i do understand how tough it must be to be in the public eye and to have venom spewed at you by these gangsters who write all the things from the privacy of their own home, things they would never say to a person's face because they're immune to emotion. they're not. but he did take it too far. >> but then you get down in the mud and fire back, you're the big star. nobody knows who these other people are. it's amazing to me how many people have blown up their career on instagram and facebook with this ugliness.

>> and not only reality tv stars that don't know any better. pr executives, if you remember justene, who worked for iac, right, and she said about to get on a flight to africa. hope i don't get aides. just kidding. i'm white. by the time she landed, she was fired and has not worked since. people don't understand this could go viral and people get hurt with one tweet. >> just the other day, he claim a black woman punched her and he called in in a sesson of tweets a whore, an animal, i think i'm cleaning some of this up. i don't think sirus xm had a choice. >> if you're angry, put down the device and walk away. really, it's that simple. walk away.

take some time to enjoy a view and then come back to twitter or instagram or facebook. >> but can you come back from this six months later? can anthony cumia get back on the air or can adam richman get a show back? >> i don't think so. and i'll tell you why. some people say, well, paula deen got her career back in a hurry because she had an audience already. duck dynasty had an audience already. you can see cumia had an audience, but he's expendable. no, i don't think they recover from it. i think if you're a bigger star, maybe after a year you can. >> a little more forgiveness after some time. joe, nice to see you here in new york city. coming up, facebook devices a surreptitious scheme to might want your emotions. this is a chilling story. our digital download is up next. h

time now for our digital download. facebook now admits it tried to manipulate the emotions of millions of people by controlling what they see in their news feed. >> one group had positive posts. one group saw negative words. >> facebook affected my mood with this study, put me in a bad mood. >> i felt violated. i felt like this is big brotherish. it was just something of the 9,000 words of the terms of use, you don't ever scroll through all of that, get me to my contacts, but they didn't have that in the terms of use, even

if you have that. >> this is a company that is so tone deaf, so facebook initially said there's nothing wrong with what we did. and then sheryl sandberg, the coo comes out and says, well, we apologize for poorly communicating about this. >> not for doing it, right. >> and i think that because everybody knows you're putting your information out there, we understand that advertising is targeted to each person because of their likes and dislikes. but there's something different about this, it's manipulating you as a person, trying to get you to change your behavior on an emotional level. it's not on a buying level. >> emotional contagion is the level. some people posted things more negatively or more positively if they got more positive information.

i feel like this news feed is supposed to be based on algorithms, you're supposed believe this is not being tinkered with or biassed in some way. what if facebook decided to tinker with the news feed which is more pro immigration. we know that mike zuckerberg is pre-immigration. >> the problem i have is news, if you're using anonymous sources, you know you're using anonymous sources because as you say, they would. talk on camera. but in this, you don't know that people are trying to manipulate you, with advertising on facebook, you know they're trying to get you to buy based on your likes. >> i would like to say that facebook has learned a lesson from this, but i don't think so. i'm going to be a lot more wary of what i'm fed in the news feed. to come, a lightning strike

leads to as blatant a rip off as you're

here are a few of your top tweets. is president obama justified. david says msm covering since day one. the only way he can fire up the

base is to blame fox. on monica lewinsky if they did at the time, they got it right. plus she put her business in the street by telling a so-called friend linda trip. she's right, media could and accept thea narrative of hillar and bill. >> it's the only thing she's got to sell, so it's a paradox, the more we focus on it. sometimes television is just as guilty. here's a piece from sacramento's abc affiliate about a local man who barely avoided a lightning strikes in yosemite, the reporter is kxa's tv george war reas republican. >> you saw it and i saw it, but

the guy who shot the video didn't see it. >> there was no sense of a flash, we just knew it was very close. >> at new york's wcbs, a reporter riched o ripped off th and voices the script word for word. >> here's more on this incredible video and how it happened. >> you saw it and i saw it, but amazingly, the guy who shot the video didn't see it. >> warren in sacramento says he think that wcbs got the tape during a video sharing agreement that his station has with cnn, but he still considers it unethical. >> people's work gets ripped off all the time, not to this extent. we would watch as the cover, the headlines of usa today would become the local news leads that afternoon, of course. >> without credit, of course.

>> they would go out and interview the same people. >> what amazes me is not that the station would take the video from another station. rewrite the script and go word for word and present it on a cbs station as your own work just strikes me as horrifying. >> it doesn't do this reporter any good to do that, even if he was told to do that. >> and the sacramento station didn't get credit for the station which is of course why it was picked up elsewhere. that does it for this media buzz edition. hope you're enjoying your holiday weekend. give us a like on our facebook page. >> good morning. it's monday, july 7th. we begin with a fox news alert. do not bring your dead cell phone to the airport or you might not be able to fly. the brand new tsa security crack down and what you need to know.

>> terror at the beach, a great white shark on the attack. (bleep) >> get out of the water. get out of the water. shark. >> the victim speaking out this morning. how he was able to get away. >> as you head back to work this monday would you rather make more money or work with good people? the answer of most might surprise you. "fox & friends first" starts right now. ♪ >> good morning. you are watching "fox & friends first" on this monday morning. we hope you had a great weekend. i am heather childers. >> i am ainsley earhardt.

thank you for starting your monday with us. power it up or leave it behind the tsa telling travelers headed to the u.s. to turn on your cell phones. the reason, agents want to make sure they are not bombed. >> this new waive ve of securit measures is terrorists are trying to find out now ways to sneak bombs on to flights. we have more on what you need to know. >> charge your cell phones and other electronic devices if you are traveling overseas at some international airports that offer direct flights to the united states. tsa screeners will be asking passengers to power on their electronic devices before they board. devices like cell phones that won't turn on won't be allowed on planes and travelers may have to undergo additional screening. >> our job is to try to anticipate the