up next o'reilly factor. go to gretawire. gretawire and "on the record." see you at gretawire. the o'reilly factor is on. tonight: >> what about the dodd damn kids here? not just in this neighborhood but in our country? >> anger in some minority communities over the federal government support offing foreign children. tonight, we'll have a special report. the unintended consequences of illegal immigration. >> our goal is to stop politicians from playing doctor. >> two u.s. senators demanding fewer abortion restrictions by the states. are these people executioners or is that unfair? we'll have a debate. >> it's the new peeping tom. they only cost 5500 bucks what's life going to be like when thousands of people

have these? >> also up ahead, john stossel may be spying on you. using drones. >> what does privacy mean? >> caution, you are about to it enter the no spin zone, the factor begins right now. ♪ ♪ hi, i'm bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. the unintended consequences of illegal immigration. that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. whenever a dangerous situation is ignored, it's likely to get worse. in the middle east, the obama administration sat back while a terrorist army gained strength in syria. now isis control as vast amount of territory and is threatening the world. same thing on america's southern border. the obama administration has not secured it, and now this fiscal year alone, we may have 100,000 foreign children to care for. that has angered many

americans, including some minorities who generally back president obama on just about everything. in chicago, where black children are being gunned down in the streets, the president's call for almost $4 billion to deal with immigrant children, is being met with disdain. >> the president setting aside all of these funds for immigrants and forsake african-american community and african-american families, i think that's a disgrace. >> in houston, there is also growing anger. >> it's not right. now billions of dollars want to be borrowed from the white house to help feed and house them. what about the god damn kids here in our neighborhood? in our country? not just in this neighborhood but in our country? >> now, it's easy to understand why poor americans resent the illegal immigration intrusion. there are other big problems as well. feds are now shipping illegal aliens all over the country but not informing the states about what's

going on. >> a couple days ago senator johans found out that 200 illegal individuals have been sent to our state. no one has been notified of the -- notified us of that why are they conducting a secret operation, essentially, transporting them all over the country and now we learn to nebraska and the federal government won't tell us what's going on. >> in just a few moments. is it legal will tell us if the federal government is violating the rights of the individual states. in iowa, the governor there flat out says he will not accept illegal ail illegal aliens. >> just because we are sympathetic and supportive country doesn't mean that we can take everybody, people need to know that there is a legal way to come this country and they need to follow the rules. >> obviously president obama is facing a crisis on illegal immigration. on his watch, more than than

2 million illegal aliens have been apprehended. many allowed to stay in the u.s.a. just to get a hearing is an ordeal. close to 400,000 cases are pending. nobody really knows how many illegal aliens are here. estimates range from 12 million to 20 million. what we do know is that the border patrol can't control the present situation. >> our agents don't like to see these kids in these conditions. and especially coming off the long journey they have been subjected to, and then the diseases that some of our agents are contracting. we had one get a bacterial pneumonia a couple days ago. a lot of guys are coming down with scabies or lice from these people. >> also the washington free beacon reports outbreak naval base where foreign children are being processed. talking points is not using scare tactics but inconceivable that huge influx f foreign children will not hurt americans. it will. one vivid example in lind, massachusetts a working

class suburb of boston foreign students have increased by more than 500 in the past three years. last year in lynn, nearly 250 students from guatemala alone enrolled in the public schools there that puts an incredible burden on the local citizens of lynn who are not generally affluent people. just the language problems alone strain the system: there comes a time when americans have to realistically assess their federal government. and if you are paying attention, that assessment is grim and getting worse by the week. and that's the memo. now for the top story tonight, is it legal. here now attorneys and fox news analysts kimberly guilfoyle and lis wiehl. >> so the law regarding taking immigrant, whether they be children or adults, doesn't matter. and secretly sending them to various states, in various capacities. that's okay? >> that is legal as now written and the supreme court said in a couple years ago they said immigration,

the immigration is federal and federal only. if there is a state, federal conflict, the feds win. so, they, no, legally they do not have to tell it the state. could they? absolutely they could tell nebraska. >> courtesy they would do it. but i still don't understand the legal aspect of this. once the illegal alien crosses the border as in the custody of the federal government, all right. the states are pretty much out of it. all right? they are out of it because the federal government is adjudicate whatever happens to the person who illegally comes here. >> but the burden still falls on the state. >> but now the obama administration says hey, nebraska, hey massachusetts, hey, new york. we are going to send these people to your property, to your property. >> and you have to be responsible. >> and you have to pay for it. >> you are going to have to pay for it. >> hearings or anything like that. but certainly to house them

here between two and five years before they get a hearing. >> you bring up a great point. even just the hang wage issues are a strain. not just to mention the mental and physical issues. what about the families i want to stay on the law. >> the law is nebulous in certain ways. the federal government as stated in the 2012 supreme court decision with immigration laws affecting arizona has widespread authority to over all of immigration issues. so they are saying to the states, we're in charge. we're the big boss. you are going to do what we tell you to do. >> i think a law has to be passed then that says the federal government has to reimburse the state and locals for any expenses. >> you you know who has to do that? congress should get involved with the power of the purse and say you have to reimburse these states as they put forward their individual expenses and what expblrks not that the obama administration would care because they don't seem to care what kind of deficit they run up. >> no, you were talking about that nearly 4 billion that they're asking for. the administration is asking for. put a rider in that.

>> attash it, in other words, to that bill and congress could say all right, administration, we will get you your 4 billion or whatever it is. >> you have to reimburse the state. >> and for costs. >> tell the states what you are doing. >> the lynn school district north of boston, they have to pay for it themselves. >> well, they do state of massachusetts doesn't do that proper notice to the states influx. >> put that in the rider, too. if you have to give proper notice they are coming. this is such a big scandal. tell congress what happened to the emails, right, guilfoyle. >> this is great. within one day, you have two different judges, one judge reggie walton, a bush appointee and you have u.s. district judge emit a clinton appointee telling the governnt you have got to turn this over. there is something nefarious going on. we want to know all the information you have about the emails. >> under oath. >> under oath. >> fill out an affidavit.

>> unfortunately it took two different groups, true the vote, okay, to put this case forward. >> and judicial watch. >> in front of judge to compel action. >> the judicial groups sued the judges ruled. now somebody from the irs, i bet you it won't be with the commissioner. >> no. he will will designate some flunky to go up there to testify under oath. >> probably pick somebody who doesn't know anything. >> it's not really the point though, because what they have asked to remember so even some guy that doesn't know a whole lot. they have got to go to say these are all the ways we try to do it. everybody else out there knows that you can find those emails. >> there is something very important too. also with respect to judicial watch, they filed a motion to compel faster discovery because they are worried that more information is going to be destroyed and they want a forensic auditor appointed to. >> you know, look, they are making some progress, it's going to take forever. >> why should it be this way?

>> why is the federal government falling apart. >> why can't congress get the records and the information think are requesting. >> going on vacation, guilfoyle, you know that. >> right now the justices are saying july 18th i want that affidavit. >> right there. next on the rundown, aclu suing on behalf of illegal alien children. surprise. later, krauthammer on whether president obama will be outfoxed by iran in the nuke negotiations. factor is coming right back.

if you suffer from constipation, you will likely also suffer from gas. introducing new dulcogas, which starts working to eliminate gas bubbles in minutes for effective relief. dulcogas, from the makers of dulcolax- nothing relieves gas faster. ♪ nothing's missed with tenatwist ♪ ♪ don't miss a beat... ♪ nothing's missed with tenatwist ♪ ♪ oooh discover the fearless protection of tena. so absorbent even when you twist not a drop escapes. ♪ nothing's missed with tenatwist ♪

ifcorner of "smart choice"e and "multiple choice," come to walgreens for help finding the one that's right for you... ...like centrum. select products are now just $9.99 with card. at the corner of happy and healthy. your eyes. even 10 miles away... they can see the light of a single candle. look after them... with centrum silver. multivitamins for your eyes, heart and brain. now with a new easy-to-swallow coating.

but they have to use special care in keeping the denture clean. dentures are very different to real teeth. they're about 10 times softer and may have surface pores where bacteria can multiply. polident is designed to clean dentures daily. its unique micro-clean formula kills 99.99% of odor causing bacteria and helps dissolve stains, cleaning in a better way than brushing with toothpaste. that's why i recommend using polident. [ male announcer ] polident. cleaner, fresher, brighter every day. impact segment tonight. the aclu has filed a nationwide class action lawsuit on behalf of thousands of illegal alien children who have recently come to the u.s.a. case has been filed in seattle. mantd insubstitute a think tank. what's the suit all about, heather. the ninthsay, heather.

circuits liberal circuit in the country. this is no accident. what they are claiming that is that anybody under the age of 18 who has come across the border illegally should have a taxpayer funded attorney to fight any immigration proceedings against him. this is unprecedented suit because the supreme court has held repeatedly that for americans there is no right to taxpayer funded attorneys in civil proceedings which moirsz immigration proceedings are what they are asking for is something that no american has a right to ask for, which is a taxpayer funded attorney in order to prolong any kind of deportation proceeding. >> fiscal year alone with a 400,000 backlog and you have to give them, each of them an attorney, which i think would be impossible. and the costs would be astronomical.

and if the ninth, most liberal court not only in the country but existed in the united states rules in their favor then it has to go to the supreme court and all of that so we are talking six or seven years. >> if you think we have a border. >> point of view. so you are sympathetic to, this right? >> bill, we have a broken immigration system. we have millions and millions only people vet from this right now drug cartel leaders who are happy that immigration are distracted. a we all agree this is a humanitarian initiative right now. we wouldn't want -- if we had a weather increment all of our children going down mexico and being placed into a system with a sophisticated prosecutor trial attorney. mother also a child. >> i don't understand that analogy at all. but, look, what heather says is that americans don't have a right in a civil case to a court appointed taxpayer funded lawyer. that's true, is it not? >> absolutely.

ism congratulation historically. why would the aclu bring this frivolous lawsuit to try to demand that rights americans don't have be given to it illegal aliens? >> this is a carve out the way i understand it. >> a carve out? >> because it's for children. >> because it's for children. american children don't have the right. >> there is adversarial system right now in place, bill pleadings motions have to be made. >> this is political bs. ploy on the part of the aclu to break down the immigration situation even further. put it into mass chaos so that everybody stays let heather go. go. >> if you think we have illegal border surge now, bill. wait until word gets out in mexico and central america that any 17-year-old who crosses the border illegally. >> gets a lawyer. >> prolong this matter already. >> absolutely. >> do you know how many minors were deported last year? 95. so, the idea that there is somehow this tsunami of

deportations lacking due process is ridiculous. immigration judges look out for the interest of minors. this is as you say it's analogy trying to bring the system down. >> okay. now, here's my question. all righty? because we only have a limited amount of time. i believe the aclu has a subversive organization that wants to break down the structure of american law. i believe that not only on this issue but on almost every other issue. now, if you agree he with heather and me, that american children and adults do not have a right for a court appointed attorney in civil matters, you have to agree that the aclu is trying to subvert our law. go. >> bill, there are less than 300 immigration judges in this country. there are about 5 to 8,000 ice agents and there are 100,000 children at our border. the greatest experiment and democracy in america should be set up in a judicious, humanitarian fashion. we agree, heart to heart,

that we should have a military presence at the border and we should. >> you agree with me on that? >> absolutely. >> i'm a former federal prosecutor and former mayor. this is not our problem financially. but. >> it will be if every lawyer, if every kid gets a lawyer. >> if we have children at our border, there is an exception, there is a carve out because we are america and we do care about kids. we owe it to these kids to make sure i don't think we owe anything to these kids except get them a lawyer. >> it should be done judiciously. >> it's not going to remain a carve out. this is going to spread to the entire illegal population. >> good debate. we appreciate you both being here. directly ahead, the new white house press seankt getting pounded by some network news correspondent. what is going on? then stossel says, he can spy on you using drones. those reports after these messages. key eye nutrients.

ocuvite has a unique formula not found in your multivitamin to help protect your eye health. ocuvite. help protect your eye health.

factor follow up segment temght. is the national media getting tougher on president obama? abc news white house correspondent jonathan karl has been leading the way, putting the obama administration on the spot. >> you see, the situation with terrorist group taking over bath territory. you see russian crew rainy. see concerns about chinese aggression in the south china sea. it doesn't seem like a time to be touting tranquility on the international scene. did you think the president's foreign policy bears any responsibility for any of this or is there is anything that he can do about any of this? >> i think what the president has been really clear about is that he will allow one core principle to guide his thinking about what we can can do to advance u.s. interest in each of these hot spots that

you have mentioned and that's the national security interest of the united states of america. >> that's gobblably gook that statement means nothing joining us from washington rick klein political director for abc news. millions of americans believe all the networks, cnn, nbc, were very soft on president obama until recently. do you see it that way? >> i think there has been accountability throughout. i do think that what you see now and maybe it's naturally part of the sixth year of the presidency. maybe it has to do with the fact so many hot spots out there and so much going on. i think you have seen a little bit more scrutiny. more scandals, semi scandals and mini scandals and definitely more ways to question the obama foreign policy. >> you guys were late to the table on the scandals. i mean the benghazi and the irs. we have done a number of stories counting up the minutes that abc, v cbs, and spent on, very small, minuscule. and now it seems that the tide is turning. and not only did karl -- and

i think karl is a good correspondent second only to ed henry, our guy. but, you see it at cbs and even nbc. i mean, when nbc starts to pound the president, you know something is going on do you feel that there is a disintegrations of the administration? >> i think this a lot of it attracts public support. less cynicism and trust of this president certainly before his election than even when there was a year ago. when you add to that a volume of things. if you asked the president throughout his first term and even through his second term about a lot of problems he faced. stock reaction has been to say look at what i inherited. no doubt he inherited a lot of bad things. that becomes less, and less credible as time goes on. >> especially when the problems get worse. >> that's right. >> you say something very interesting. you say it attracts the polls. i don't think network news coverage should track the polls. we certainly don't track the polls on the factor. we do the stories that we believe are important for the american people to know about. but i think you are right. i think that the network newscasts in the evening,

morning kind of doesn't even do anything anymore. they are more entertainment-oriented. but the evening newscast they are late to the buffet. do you know what i'm talking about, rick? i think everybody would agree that you guys weren't tough on the president as these things were developing. >> i think if you look at benghazi, i think we were very aggressive in our reporting early on in that it and john karl as you mentioned was outfront in a lot of that. also look at the imirt entirety of coverage. that 30 minutes you see at night is just a piece of what abc news represents. for all networks, no question this is a different phase of the presidency. i think in terms of how their ambitions have played out. in terms it of how the scrutiny has been applied. things are different now. it is a different stage of presidency. >> why is it different now? is it because the failure is so glaring? >> look, there is more out there. i don't think there is any question that there has been more quantity of scandals and stories to cover. >> you are a savvy guy, you are the political director of abc news. do you see the administration failing at

this point? >> no. i don't think that's a fair assessment. i don't think an overall assessment of failure. there is plenty of ways to ask for accountability and say look, this is not working the way it is supposed to be. look at irs scandal and benghazi. lots of legitimate questions to ask. >> you don't think he is he failing. will it change if iran walks away from the nuke negotiations? >> i just don't think it's a kind of on-off switch around failure or success. >> are you satisfied with jay carney and the new spokesman at the white house giving rank gobbledygook when you ask a directed question. >> i don't think that's a direct question to john karl. more times you get direct answers. spin involved in any answer from the white house press secretary. i think that was what we saw with jay carney. you see that now with josh. you kind of expect that i don't think that's going to be the form. >> i didn't see that from the late tony snow and dana perino at the bush white house. i didn't see that. >> big fans of the late tony snow as well as dana. i think there was definitely politics laid from the podium under them as well. always going to be frustrated by the answers

because we want more of them. >> cogent answer, you know, deal with what the question is. certainly that didn't happen there all right, rick. we appreciate you coming on as always. thanks for taking the time. plenty more ahead as the factor moves along this evening. charles krauthammer on whether iran will stop developing a nuclear weapon or embarrass the west and president obama in negotiations. but, next, stossel says he can spy on you, using drones and he will prove it it we hope you stay tuned to those reports. starts with back pain... ...and a choice. take 4 advil in a day which is 2 aleve... ...for all day relief. "start your engines" [ cat meows ]

♪ ♪ da-da-da-da-da, bum-da, bum-da ♪ ♪ bum-da, bum-da ♪ the animals went in two by two ♪ ♪ the sheep and the frog and the kangaroo ♪ ♪ and they all went marching, marching in two by two ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] the nissan pathfinder, with intuitive four-wheel drive. an adventure worth sharing. nissan. innovation that excites. we're changing the way we do . business, with startup ny. we've created tax free zones throughout the state. and startup ny companies will be investing hundreds of millions of dollars in jobs and infrastructure. thanks to startup ny, businesses can operate tax free for 10 years. no property tax. no business tax. and no sales tax. which means more growth for your business, and more jobs. it's not just business as usual. see how new york can help your business grow, at startup.ny.gov

he thought it was the endn for his dof the conversation.d... she didn't tell him that her college expenses were going up. or that she maxed out her card during spring break. when the satellite provider checked his credit, he found out his daughter didn't pay her bills. but he's not worried. now he checks his credit report and score at experian.com, allowing him to keep track of his credit and take a break of his own. experian. live credit confident.

stossel segment our privacy laws are weak. john stossel has been investigating the use of drones to spy on you. >> i can can take it away, bring it over here. and it will go right back -- or it should right back where it was set. >> all this is very cool. if anyone can buy these. what does it mean for our privacy? >> now what will happen is video of, i don't know, people sunbathing in the back of their own house or just simply someone looking through someone's neighborhood to see what's inside. >> that was pretty cool until started taking pictures of my wife over there. >> these women were willing participants. but the drone can fly and spy for miles it's noisy but high in the air it would be easy to spy on people who didn't know. the next generation of drones will be less

noticeable. this one looks like a humming bird. >> here now is stossel. that's pretty and 500 bucks, right? >> 500 bucks. of the camera is another 700 bucks. >> still 1200. i mean, you know. some people can get t will get r and soon everybody will have them. >> you can program it to fly around somebody's house and look in the windows and all of that right? >> two mile range. >> two mile range? >> yeah. >> you catch somebody doing that you take a fish net and you grab the drone and you know who did it. do those people get prosecuted? >> well, it depends. we have peeping tom laws. they vary state by state. >> do we have drone peeping tom laws. >> that will work out now in the courts. you say the laws aren't strong enough. but they will work this out. >> what do you mean they will work it out? they didn't work it out. the nasa is spying on angela merkel. come on. they are not going to work out anything. >> right now you can look at your neighbor's house. but if you put up a step

ladder and look over the fence. most states would say that's against the law. >> you have these devices now where you can hear people's conversations through walls. do you know that? >> i do. and this stuff will get as long as you are public property. the drens fly around, what if the people in the backyard are are doing something private and they got a big fence around them so they are entitled to do it and then the drone is over there shooting. is that against the law? >> they say good fences make good neighbors. there are no fences in the sky. >> that's not against the law. i think, stossel, you could probably invade their privacy. >> it will quickly come down to do you have an expectation of privacy in your backyard? yes. and if somebody spies on you and then releases that, you find out about it, can you can sue them and you would probably win. >> you think so. >> yes. >> look you you are a celebrity, minor, but a celebrity. and these paparazzi are everywhere. they will use this stuff. >> coming after you. you have a certain expectation on your property,. >> right. >> rand paul, interviewed

him about this he said i would take out my gun and shoot the thing down. >> shoot the thing down with his gun. what if you miss and kill a 6-year-old? i mean, come on. >> responsible for that. >> if you are shooting straight up. >> shooting straight up. >> you know, american airline plane, you have got to be careful with shooting the stuff down. >> that's true. i don't mean to recommend that. >> i like the report. i think that the high tech gear that is developing now is going to leave us all vulnerable to anybody who wants to harm us. and get stuff on us and put it on the internet. >> it also does great things. if a kid is lost, finding missing children, farmers can use it to survey their crops. saves people lots of money. this is a great thing. >> so overall you think it's a great thing. >> yeah. technology, changing, it's wonderful. >> all right there is he. stossel. when we come right back, two u.s. senators want to tell all 50 states how to handle abortion. the bigger question is why are these senators so bullish on destroying life?

then krauthammer on the iran nuke situation which may come to a head this weekend. upcoming. feet...splashing. better things than the joint pain and swelling of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. if you're trying to ma, now may be time to ask about xeljanz. xeljz (tofacitinib) is a small pill, not an injection or infusion, for adults with moderate to severe ra for whom methotrexate did not work well. xeljanz can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. seris, sometimes fatal infections and cancers have happened in patients taking xeljanz. don't start xeljanz if you have any infection, unless ok with your doctor. tears in the stomach or intestines, low bod cell counts and higher liver tes and cholesterol levels have happened. your doctor should perform blood tts before you start and while taking xeljanz, and roinely check certain liver tests. tell your doctor if you have been to a region

where certain fungal infections are common, and if you have had tb, hepatitis b oc, or are prone to infections. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take, and if you are pregnant, or plan to be. taken twice daily, xeljanz can reduce the joint pain and swelling of moderate to severe ra, even without methotrexate. ask if xeljanz is right for you. ♪ ♪ [ male announcer ] if you can't stand the heat, get off the test track. get the mercedes-benz you've been burning for at the summer event, going on now at your authorized mercedes-benz dealer. but hurry, offers end july 31st. share your summer moments in your mercedes-benz with us.

offers end july 31st. you fifteen percent or more on huh, fiftcar insurance.uld save everybody knows that. well, did you know words really can hurt you? what...? jesse don't go! jesse...no! i'm sorry daisy, but i'm a loner. and a loner gotta be alone. heee yawww! geico. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. jesse? ♪ ♪ start a team. join a team. walk to end alzheimer's.

visit alz.org/walk today. thanks for staying with us. i'm bill o'reilly in the unresolved problem segment tonight. restricting abortion. medical advances now prove

that human d.n.a. is present upon conception. that has caused some people to question whether abortion is the destruction of a human being. the supreme court has ruled otherwise in roe v. wade which is the law of the land. some individual states like texas are now passing restrictions to abortions making them tougher to get. that has angered senators richard blumenthal, democrat from connecticut and tammy baldwin from wisconsin, also a democrat they want a federal law passed that knocks out most restrictions overriding state law on abortions with us now to debate the issue. monica crowley from washington kirsten powers there is a hearing today in congress on this and how do you see it, kirsten? >> well, first of all it's obviously an election year stunt. it probably won't each pass the senate let alone the house. this is something to get the women wind up in the democratic party base who, as you know, have been wind up before this the so-called war on women. this is part of that strategy i also think that

this is destructive becau it is -- most of these -- most of the laws that i think that they would like to roll back are laws that were put in place to make abortion clinics safe. for example, like the gosnell clinic in pennsylvania. these kind of laws were created to respond to what happened to women. there was a woman who died multiple women who died there. >> they don't want a waiting period. most of the laws center around a waiting period or a doctor's obligation what abortion would entail. here is what really disturbs pee about blume that you will and baldwin. we now know and you are a democrat, right, kirsten? >> um-huh, yes. >> we now know that human d.n.a. is present as i stated. that's beyond any debate so that there are individuals in america and these two senators among them who basically are saying we don't really care about that we don't care about it we want abortion as much made as easy as possible with no

moral, you know, moral consideration attached to it. i don't understand that. who are these people? to reject human d.n.a.? who? who are they? >> they are people who think that they dispute that that makes it a human life. >> and dispute. >> equal value. let me say. this of equal value to the life of a woman. >> i understand that they dispute that based on their own personal opinion with no data whatsoever. and that is disturbing. now, we know you are antiabortion. and all of that. but the point of the matter is, that these two people, blumenthal and baldwin are now putting themselves up to say to america, let's have more abortions. let's have as many as we can have. don't you think there is something morally wrong with that? >> they have about a third of the democrats. and it's a growing list that's actually supporting this bill, which they are calling the women's health protection act.

i would like to seat baby's health protection act. tris citizen is right when she says this is election year, they are trying to keep the war on women energized so this is what is coming out of it you are right to say that i think a couple of things, number one, they need women in the democratic fold so this is an appeal to them. this is also ideologically where they are. they are so heavily invested in the abortion industry and in stalled protecting women and reproductive rights that they continue to go down this road. so when democrats say that they want abortion legal, safe, and rare, we see things like this and we realize that's false. because what they really want is abortion to be universally available. common, without limit, and essentially paid for by the taxpayer. that's what they really want and that's what this act would do. >> do you agree with that kirsten? >> well, i mean, i can't even think of anybody in recent history who evens has said what the sort of famous phrase that bill clinton used about had the abortion should be rare on -- no, that's no longer the position of the democratic

party. i don't know if i would go. >> they want abortion to be as much as -- >> -- yeah. i think -- you know. from their perspective, it's the woman's choice and that she should have as much availability and access to abortion as possible. >> i would say very few limits i know you have stated morally what you believe. how you can stay in that party then? >> well, because there is no -- well, first of all, i'm a big believer that you should stay and advocate from within. there actually is a democrats for life and, you know, there are groups that are democrats who advocate for that and i think it's good to do that one of the only issues i disagree with the democratic party on. i can become a republican and disagree with them on pretty much everything. >> independent like me and smack both sides. yeah, i could become independent. >> let's give monica the last word. >> we would welcome kirsten on the conservative side. >> what's interesting about this.

and what makes this so extreme and radical what they are proposing here and what they generally believe is a party as kirsten points out is that public attitudes on abortion have changed. so where it's trended on issues like gay marriage and more liberal way. on abortion it's actually trended to pro-life. >> as you said, they are beginning up their base. >> that's right. but that's a very small fraction of the american people. >> i don't think most americans want the states to be intruded upon. >> vast majorities oppose late term abortions. >> the good news is, this will never get through congress. there is no way it can. >> that's right. >> all right, ladies, thanks very much. krauthammer on deck. this weekend is the deadline for iran to give up nuke weapons program. will iran do that or will president obama have another major problem on his hands? charles moments away.

. . when you run a business, you can't settle for slow.

that's why i always choose the fastest intern. the fastest printer. the fastest lunch. turkey club. the fastest pencil sharpener. the fastest elevator. the fastest speed dial. the fastest office plant. so why wouldn't i choose the fastest wifi? i would. switch to comcast business internet and get the fastest wifi included. comcast business. built for business.

back of the book segment tonight, according to plund freeze nuclear weapons program and not destroy it as secretary of state kerry leading negotiations in vienna. joining us from washington to predict what will happen this weekend. charles krauthammer, author 4j4(p&c@ 4j4(p&c@ all right, i believe this underreported. here. and what's at stake at war. iran continuing to develop a nuclear weapon. and you say? >> and also is not just israel. this is in the longer run, this is the most serious threat to the west. you know, russia is not going to invade the west. you can have an isis state in iraq. it's not going to have the capacity to affect us directly. you talk about iran. a serious country. 80 million people. tremendous oil resources. advanced industry.

lead terror in the world according to our state department. it is on the threshold of becoming a nuclear power. openly developing intercontinents ballistic missiles. meaning the only reason for that is a missile that can hit new york or any other city in the united states is it is now on the threshold. we are actually negotiating a deal which will leave them on the threshold. this new agreement. this new leak. this new concession so-called that was set by the foreign minister of iran to the "new york times" yesterday is essentially saying with the six month deadline, remember. six months. if the program was not agreed to be dismantled by then that would be the end of it. all options on the table. always a bluff. no nonsense, as empty as a the red line obama had in syria. so here we are. sunday is six months. and the reason the iranian

foreign minister floated this completely worthless proposal is to give john kerry an excuse to go back to washington, which he is doing right now, to now. to consult with the president and to say that there's enough promising in this new offer to make us extend the deadline. i assure you that's what's going to happen. >> all right. so they're going to extend the deadline ofnegotiations, and meantime, iran continues to develop its nuclear weapons program. >> absolutely. >> netanyahu, the prime minister told brit hume on sunday, that the whole thing is a farce, and i don't believe that israel is going to give it much more time before they go in and start attacking some of the nuclear facilities inside iran. >> but imagine the box the israelis are in, they are the ones who are most directly immediately threatened. iran has written on the missiles, we can see it, in the parades they have, they have on

them written death to israel. we know where the missiles would be headed. it would only take three of them to destroy all of israel in an afternoon. it took hitler six years to destroy -- it would take them less if they had the nuclear weapons. >> the problem with where they are now, the iranians are a this remember hold nuclear state. they are three months, six months away from -- if they decided to go for a weapon, they would have it in six months. under the proposal they're talking about now, they would simply freeze what they have now. there's not an iota of dismanned elling or even taking stuff away, let alone talk about -- >> well, we'll freeze where we are, we're six months away, and we'll violate it any time we want because that's what we do. >> what they're demanding is the

total relief from sanctions in return for doing nothing at all. >> what president obama should do, in my opinion is come sunday when they don't say we're going to dismantle. impose all economic sanctions against them, which really hurt iran, until they say they're going to start dismantling. that's pretty simple. >> that's awhat you would expect from a serious president. here you have a president who's foreign policy has collapsed everywhere, in ukraine, in syria, in iraq, in libya, he's gotten nothing to claim. and as susan rice reportedly said to the president a month ago, we have to put points on the board. and what they would like to do, and they will do by extending negotiations is to come up with a figu leaf of a deal that will appear to be containing the iranian nuclear program.

all those who understand the details will do nothing of the sort. to give them, to be able to say, look, we just came to an historic deal with iran, it will put these restrictions -- >> you think the press is going to buy it, though? you think the american press is going to go along with that? >> i think the president is cynical enough about this, he is unserious enough about denying iran and nuclear weapons, that he will chose if it comes to that, a bad deal, a fig leaf of a deal. >> will the press allow him to do it or pound him into pudding? >> they will allow him to do it, because they're lazy, they will not actually examine the details. the way they did not examine the details of the interim deal, which has done absolutely nothing to hold back the program until now. >> next week, charles, you'll be back on, we'll discuss this again, as we said, it comes to us over the weekend. >> we appreciate it, charles. as always, factor tip of the day, denied visiting the white

house. the tip moments away.

factor tip of the day, why is it so hard to visit the white house in a moment. we have a brand new deal for you on billo'reilly.com, it is sensational. you get any one of my books free, plus, dennis miller's new c.d. free as well, it pays for your entire membership, does it not? why become a premium member. >> the no spin news every night. >> number two, get massive discounts on all your stuff. for gift-giving and things you might like to have. you get to talk with other premium members on the message boards. you get to grade the factor each evening and receive special updates for us. my upcoming book is one of the three books you can get if you become a premium member. please check it out at billo'reilly.com.

now to the mail, i'm appa appalled to glenn beck's visit to the border, wait until people in central america hear he's giving them millions of dollars, they'll flow in here like water. michael, indiana. i'd like your immigration plan, but how will a national guard be able to stop the flow of illegal aliens if they can't use force? >> that's a good question. when i was covering the rodney king riots in los angeles, the guard was called in to stop the violence. they had the power to detain and physically stop anyone breaking the law in los angeles. that's what the guard would do on the mexican border, detain trespassers until federal civil authorities show up, or physically turn them around. bob buchanan, saw jesse waters in vermont, and it scared me. never mind the national guard on the borders.

michael, new hampshire's motto is live free or die, ours should be better red than dead. matt smith albany new york, jesse waters irritates me, i'm bothered by his face, attitude and turned up collars. he does that on push, just to annoy you. felicia murphy, your tip of the day on saving money shows how out of touch you are. i don't need a financial lecture from a gazillionaire. your tip about putting loose change in a big jar really worked, i saved $8,000 that way. recently i received this letter from lorleen brown who lives in nevada. a former major in the air force. our trip to visit the white

house was denied. here's what you do. contact your congressman and put in a formal request. all americans have to do that to get the public tour of the white house. you can apply up to six months in advance to your congressman, but you have to get his okay. now, if you guys don't get tickets out there, e-mail me back and i'll handle it for you. i'm sure congressman ammadae will come through. factor tip of the day, a white house visit is complicated, but it's worthwhile to make the effort. and that is it for us tonight. please check out the fox news factor website, which is different from bill o'reilly.com. we'd like you to spout off from anywhere in the world, o'reilly@foxnews.com. word of the day, do not be cryptic when writing to the factor. our mad as hell segments will be on thursday. please send us letters if you have a beef about anything.

madashell@foxnews.com. miss megyn is next. thanks for watching us. the spin stops here, we're definitely looking out for you. we have got breaking news tonight with a new ultimatum in a violent showdown in the middle east that is threatening to explode. israel tells some 100,000 palestinians you have hours to get out of your homes or you may die. welcome to the kelly file, i'm megyn kelly. the deadline is roughly 1:00 a.m. eastern time. while the clock counts down, watch and listen to what our live cameras have captured tonight in the dangerous border between israel and gaza. >> hamas