hello, everyone, i'm greg gutfeld with kimberly guilfoyle, bob beckel, jessie waters, and she shoots pool with a bread stick, dana perino, this is "the five." as wreckage gets moved, belongings get rifled, bodies get tossed into trains, victims' families must wonder if anything is left, a grandmother's ring, a husband's wedding band, a child's bracelet. the separatists may be in possession of the black boxes, which is like trusting charlie sheen with your drugs. the world waits for us as we wait for him. a headless bird squawking in a

field of ghastly realities. downed planes, kidnapped girls, isis attacks. the world has always been bad. the globe is now more worm and less apple. do you think putin minds when the shining city on a hill kills the lights and announces they're in for the night? anything tougher might in site a response. it is not our fight we say about all fights, which is why there are more fights. but the globe won't move unless we move it. if the world were a classroom, america is not that back row stoner riding a case of senioritis, he is the star qb, class a president that gets others involved by going first. if you would rather steer clear, get used to the suffering. technology will grab every gory, horrifying detail. hang back if you like, but the vacuum left behind will be filled with screams no ipod can mask. >> jessie, welcome to the show. looking stellar as ever.

>> i look like you. >> it works. for me it is not about culpability, it is about taking control of a situation where we can protect the dignity of the dead and evidence at a crime scene. what do you make of that? >> it is a crime scene, a human tragedy, a war crime. the president has really done nothing. something you said about sleeping policemen jumped out with me. i love that you have profanity in your column. very provocative. i enjoy that. the sleeping policeman. he is uncomfortable being the policeman, remember what he said about his friend busted in cambridge. he wants it both ways, you said in the article, internationally his hands are tied, but domestically, he can do what he wants, act outside the constitution. he can't have it both ways. when you say he is present, when

he was a senator, 129 times, that's not showing the conviction the world wants to rally around this guy. this is a moment we can rally around this guy, all he's done is saying today, you know what, you invaded crimea, here is a slap on the wrist. now they're shooting down plains, innocent people are being killed. he says if you do this again, you face further isolation. i don't think putin is scared of that. >> bob, do you think we are being too hard on him? i asked you before about the idea of playing it cool somehow to i guess maybe to express the idea that we are not phased by this. however, it seems to me it is like he's afraid to ruffle putin's feathers, because he's afraid of what putin might do. >> diplomacy and world affairs are complicated. they weren't in the cold war, there were two sides, clear sides, that's the ussr. i would say when people talk about securing this crime scene, how in the world are you doing

that without putting american soldiers on the ground, it is impossible. and i would go a step further. i think all these issues that are around the world today, if ronald reagan were president, they would still be there, and there would be no answer to them, unless you wanted to commit united states forces on the ground in nigeria, in egypt, go on down the list. do you want to do that? the american people don't want to do that, we don't have the money to do that. the idea of leadership, what does leadership mean in this? when obama tried to get people to do sanctions, none of the europeans would do it. now they're thinking about it. i repeat what i said last week this is the worst nightmare putin could have. >> i would like to think so, his poll numbers are still really high in russia. state run media, they don't know what's going on half the time. they believe the ukrainians shot down the jet. kimberly, if russia is the culprit, we can do things, bring back a missile defense system,

put troops in eastern europe. >> right, and we can show some leadership. the problem is in the skies over ukraine this past week, we saw the consequences of obama's policy, leading from behind. that's my opinion, bob. you have your turn. >> you're right. >> and i don't think putin is back on his heels or worried about it, his poll numbers are this is about oil, about access to the black sea. he is not going to stop until he gets it. he is going to do whatever it takes to put his country in the best position possible. crimea, now ukraine. he is not sorry. he is not worried or running out to hire a madison avenue pr firm to fix this for him. he's the problem solver. look at his military and intelligence background. this is a ruthless man that believes in no problem with collateral consequences and damages, as long as he can achieve the goal. unfortunately, he has absolutely no respect for the united states or for the president or for secretary kerry, or any of that group. how do we know?

look at his actions. >> dana, in the media you hear you don't want to put putin a corner. but doesn't that fear paralyze the west? this is why he doesn't have any respect for us because we're scared of him? >> seems to me putin used to be swayed by public opinion, his reputation in the world, but something seems to have changed, i think maybe after his last election when he became president again. >> wrestling the tiger. >> i think she's right, or the bear, so to speak. i think something you said is very important, and that is the state run media in russia. they say things on air constantly about the ukrainians being a nazi party. >> yes. >> they're told they're evil. all of the information that is broadcast out of russia is that the ukrainians are to blame. >> right. >> what's interesting, and

backed by the west, absolutely. in 1988, bob, you know more about this than i do, when the pan am flight was blown up over scotland, the west pulled together and isolated libya and did it fairly rapidly. it is not apples to apples necessarily, but i do think in this case you see some strong rhetoric from our ambassador, samantha power at united nations. i don't know if it is a strategy for the white house comments from the president not to match up with strong rhetoric from samantha power at the u.n., but seems to me it might be able to help if they could make those two match up and back it up with action. could help the policy position to get europe to try to take the lead. >> do you know that you said the president of the united states was responsible for the downing of this airplane? >> no, i didn't say that, bob. >> if you go back, you said that plane was down because obama's weakness. >> i did not. >> i think the point she was trying to make, bob, she said if you have diplomacy, it only

works with threat of military action. series after series of the president -- let me talk. >> putin is not a threat. sitting in a broke country that has some wealth, went to georgia awhile, kicked out. went to crimea, he will stay there. >> that's what the obama administration believes. >> why do you think he is a threat? >> he is invading other countries. >> he didn't invade crimea? >> he invaded crimea. >> he invaded other countries. >> just one country. >> just one country. >> you don't have facts, that's the problem. you make this guy a bigger guy than he is. >> he is medicine he willing in iran, allowing them to nuclear up. i consider him a threat. i think the president does, too. >> i think, if i can just thread a needle here, there is a lawless environment in that area, okay, that is a problem.

there are irregular soldiers like mercenaries. they have scorn for international norms and rules, they don't care, and it was not ukrainian, it is all the evidence ties back to the russians providing the weapons, possibly the intelligence, maybe even pulling the trigger. to me, that means culpability. i don't think a ceasefire is enough. i think complete withdrawal of those from ukraine is a must for the world to be able to move forward. >> and the world being willing to join the united states in sanctions, which they're not willing to do, they're worried about the flow of oil and gas. i go back to what i said. >> be able to persuade them. >> he tried. merkel buckled over the weekend, but they're scared of losing the energy supply. what do you expect, if the united states were to send more troops or boats and aircraft carriers in the mediterranean, do you think in nigeria, they go

oh, how scary that is. >> one of the first things we can do, we cut defense to pay for entitlements. we know where that's going to end up. bob, we will be like incapable of defending ourselves. >> we are the largest military force in the world, including every country combined. >> watching china change dramatically. >> that's right. and you know i have been strong on the chinese. i think we ought to deal with them first. >> yes. but our military assets have become weaker as we cut defense. we should be going the opposite direction. >> the military assets have gotten stronger and stronger and stronger. it is time they be cut in certain areas. >> why don't we then use military assets to help ukraine? >> what are we going to do? >> why don't we supply weapon systems and things to combat the quote, unquote drunken thugs. >> if you don't think the cia put weapons in there. >> they're not doing a good enough job.

they're winning in ukraine. we could do more. ukrainians would like us to do more, they asked us to do more. >> i want to go to sound on tape of our secretary of state on i guess this we can talking about the president's handling of this. >> the fact is that the united states of america, george, is more engaged in more places in the world, and frankly i think to greater effect than at any time in recent memory. i think the american people ought to be proud of what this president has done in terms of peaceful diplomatic engagement, rather than quick trigger, deploying troops, starting or engaging in a war of choice. >> so he is doing the same thing, he is saying you are either a war monger or this relaxed person who engages in tough language and token sanctions. but if you go over that a little bit, you must be a war monger. >> i don't see how it helps anything. i don't think it resolved any of

the rhetoric, communication between us and the russians, i don't think that he did anything today to help the situation at all. >> do you expect him then to go into the ukraine with military assets? do you think you expect him to go to syria with military action? into nigeria? there's no answer. >> there are answers, plenty of them. there are 12 nations effected by that plane crash. we are the best coalition builders in the world. we have built coalitions that have driven back armies. if we took those 12 nations and went in there and we led the investigation, that would be a victory. i have seen reporters rifling through people's belongings! >> to do a serious investigation of a crime scene or airplane crash scene, you have to have access to it, and you have to be able to do it -- >> you said that after benghazi as well. >> four months to go to the benghazi crime scene. where were they then either.

this is a way to kick the can down the road. they were waiting for the irs investigation, waiting for the va investigation. why don't they send investigators in? >> how are they going to get there? how do they get there when people are shooting at them? people are being shot at. >> you said we have the most amazing army and now we can't go to the ukraine? >> you want to put them on the ground in ukraine? if you want to be a war monger in the ukraine, do it. >> boys. >> that's bull [bleep]. i want to protect the crime scene there. >> the urge to defend president obama is like overtaking everyone's common sense and sensiblity. i tell you what, the world deserves a better policeman than one that can only fight and defend, a president that should at this point be able to build a coalition. >> that's all it is. not talking about invasion. >> the world doesn't have faith and confidence in us to have

their back to lead with consequence, meaning coalition build. do something so people don't go ahead terrorizing, isis taking over in iraq, syria, christians being murdered. obamacare kidnapping and raping children. it has to stop. >> you can't say what are you going to do, bob. people are answering. next, americans stand behind israel, does the administration? john kerry backed israel's offensive against hamas, off camera was caught on a hot mike criticizing the mission. see the tape coming up.

president obama also addressed the crisis in the mideast in his rose garden statement today. take a listen. >> i said many times israel has a right to defend itself against rocket and tunnel attacks from hamas. i've also said, however, that we have serious concerns about the rising number of palestinian civilian deaths and the loss of israeli lives. and that is why it now has to be

our focus and the focus of the international community to bring about a ceasefire that end the fighting and that can stop the deaths of innocent civilians, both in gaza and in israel. >> secretary of state john kerry just arrived there to work on a ceasefire. chris wall as questioned him about it. >> a hell of a pinpoint operation. a hell of a pinpoint operation. >> right, escalating significantly, underscore the need for ceasefire. >> we've got to get over there. >> you said it is a hell of a pinpoint operation. are you upset the israelis are going too far? >> it is tough, it is tough to have this kind of operation. i reacted obviously in a way that, you know, anybody does with respect to young children and civilians, but war is tough, and i said that publicly and i'll say it again. >> in a new interview with bret

baier, israel's prime minister says any blame for civilian death should fall entirely on hamas. >> this is the cruelist, most grotesque war. not only do they target civilians, they want to pile up as many civilian deaths as possible, so if there's any complaints, and there should be, about civilian deaths, they belong, the responsibility and blame belongs in one place, hamas. i don't think anyone should get that wrong. >> you will see more of has interview on "special report" with bret baier. greg, let me ask you something. i had a theory, no one, republican or democrat, should ever do five sunday shows. something will go wrong, one hit it out of the ballpark, the other once -- there was a tweet lending more concern about the administration's approach. i think that senator kerry handled the hot mike situation

fairly well because praise in public, criticize in private, maybe should have known the hot mike was on. twitter is a different thing all together. undersecretary of diplomacy tweeted about the crisis, then #unitedforgaza. he then retracted that and apologized. when you have twitter, it might be better to get off it all together. >> everybody in government should get off these social negotiation. we are a world power. we are not a middle class slumber party where josh is going to go braid jen's hair and egg tommy's house. there's wars, and what's happening is things are said on twitter are driving policy. if it doesn't sound cool on twitter, it is probably not a good thing. they would never do that about israel but would about gaza. i don't know. >> let me ask you about something, criticism of israel

that their operations have been disproportionate. what's interesting is that hamas and gaza, when they made that agreement, that alliance, you saw more aggression taking place there, all of the money, talk about disproportionate, in gaza, basically what they have is proactive weapons, weapons they can send out, don't have ways to defend themself, israel does. do you think that criticism of being disproportionate is unfair to israel? >> absolutely. despite what john kerry said, these are pin prick strikes. if anything is more restrained because of ratio. do you think the united states wouldn't just go hog wild on quebec and wipe it off the face of the earth? of course they would. the fact that the media is showing the dead civilians, that's exactly what hamas wants. that's the only way they're

going to get united states and europe to come in and say stop doing this, that's the only defense hamas has, and iran wants that and we are feeding right into it. >> bob people might be surprised but maybe shouldn't be that the secretary of state announced that the united states will provide an additional $47 million to help address the humanitarian crisis in gaza. help, explain why that's in keeping with past practice. >> well, we have been doing this for a long time israelis' request. i don't usually agree with netanyahu, but i think he has a strong point here. the deaths in gaza are laid at the feet of hamas, not at israel's feet. hamas has decided to leave their population, even though israel has dropped leaflets, made phone calls to get people out of there. arab league, egyptians both offered a ceasefire, and israel

accepted and hamas hasn't. if hamas is not willing to honor a ceasefire from the biggest arab countries, then it is proper and right for israel to go and take out their capability. >> kimberly, put it in a broader perspective if you could about the entire region, the country that doesn't get enough blame in this is iran for having provided hamas all these weapons and the money and resources to do what they're doing. >> certainly. they should be addressed and strongly and nobody is doing that because unfortunately we lack the diplomacy and influence in that area that we should have to be able to effectuate a positive outcome. unfortunately, israel, one of our strongest allies are in a position with their hands tied behind their back with no allies to support them. they have every right to be able to defend themselves and defend their people against terrorists and we shouldn't condone actions by terrorists, especially when israel is trying to do the best they can to secure their country and protect their people. keep in mind, this came in the

aftermath of three boys being murdered and buried in shallow graves. what were they supposed to do? exercise restraint? no. they have to do something to be able to establish their position, send a message, and be able to have people of israel sleep well at night knowing that they have a leader that will defend them and protect them, and by the way, we'll do it with the eye toward having the least amount of civilian casualty. >> just so i am not accused here of another -- just because you said they condone, who condones hamas' action? you said somebody condones it, israel has their hands tied, has no allied support. >> i'm saying the united states and any world leader should not condone the actions of terrorists, and in this particular case, hamas, being the terrorist, because they murdered three young boys, that should have consequence. >> i agree with that. where does the united states condone -- >> the position that israel has taken, the way they have chosen to address the situation, that's

leadership. that's what i am talking about. >> where do they condone hamas' action. >> we should be standing up and supporting netanyahu, and unfortunately we have not done so, the relationship with israel, one of our strongest allies, has been severely jeopardized. we have shown netanyahu disrespect when the president met with him and this is not acceptable and we're seeing the outcome of that. >> we have to go, guys. >> well, one area where it is condoned or sympathetic is in our media. no longer should hamas have the luxury. whenever hamas bombs something, it is always dismissed. it is not a very good bomb. >> also the photographs. most of the photographs from the israelis are ones are aggression, most of the ones in gaza of suffering, so it is never the reverse. at least in mainstream media. >> but it is propaganda. >> it is a problem. >> the last hamas attack killed

over a dozen israeli soldiers, now the media can't say they're not good at it. they killed a bunch of men. >> oh, they're not that good a terrorist. national guard troops will be headed to secure the mexican border, but president obama is not the one sending them. we're going to tell you who is next. shopping online is as easy as it gets. wouldn't it be great if hiring plumbers, carpenters and even piano tuners were just as simple? thanks to angie's list, now it is. we've made hiring anyone from a handyman to a dog walker as simple as a few clicks. buy their services directly at angieslist.com no more calling around. no more hassles. start shopping from a list of top-rated providers today. angie's list is revolutionizing local service again. visit angieslist.com today.

if president obama isn't sending troops to secure the border, rick perry will. today, the texas governor announced plans to deploy 1,000 troops from the national guard. >> i will not stand idly by why citizens are under assault and little children from central america are detained in squaller. we are too good a country for that to occur. that is why today i am using my executive authority as governor of texas an ad activating the national guard. 1,000 troops in support of the department of public safety on-going surge of operation. >> strong words and rhetoric, backed up by action, jesse, from governor perry. >> about time.

they're force multipliers. the regular border patrol is busy changing diapers, making sandwiches for minors. it is time, it is getting deadly serious. some border patrol agents in texas were fired on, a very dangerous situation. a guy tried to come across, border patrol caught him, caught and release policy under president obama, let him go, he wound up in louisiana picked up on kidnapping and murder charges. this is because the federal government has failed to protect the border, and it is about time. i remember bill richardson in new mexico, democrat, did the same thing, it is effective for the time being. >> every major crisis, i said this before, around the world, israel, ukraine, iraq, it is about a border. still, the president here fails to see the importance of a border here. he thinks borders are people that live upstairs. he doesn't see it as a crisis because i think he sees influx of new citizens as opportunity to dilute the nationalism and

exceptionalism of the united states, because he thinks, bob, bob, are you having a coronary, wake up. he has a different view of the way america is. he doesn't like the way it is now, he wants to change it, sees it as a way to change it. but it is amazing how every crisis erases another one. if you think from irs to va to bergdahl to isis to the border to ukraine, it would be cool if obama was a multi tasker, he is not even a single tasker. that's why they keep being erased. >> my goodness, that sums it up. dana? >> this is not unprecedented, president bush sent national guard troops not just to texas but all border states, called upon other governors to pitch in. in 2010, president obama sent national guard troops. i am not sure why president obama did it then, doesn't want to do it now, but rick perry has the ability to do that as governor. the national guard, however, in my opinion is for emergencies,

and should be temporary, and unless there's a policy change, i don't see how this situation continues to be temporary or an emergency. it could be this is a stop gap measure governor perry is using to help the public safety entities that are already there, but again, just make sure people understand, this is not unprecedented. national guard troops have been used to good effect before by both obama and bush. >> and governor perry saying there can be no national security without border security. it seems to make sense. we also need to protect the children by not making it so easy, with such a porous border, everybody can go over. families are suffering, they're giving things to drug dealers to cross the border. do something. we bear some responsibility to secure the border and not make it such an attractive nuisance that everybody wants to just walk on over without any consequences. this is the problem i think, bob. >> well, just put a couple of

facts out here. the border patrol, number of border patrol agents doubled under obama. the amount of fence built for border security has increased more under obama than anybody else. he has sent national guard there before. rick perry could have done this before. he wanted to make a grand stand of himself. some of those comments about taking care of diapers and the rest of that is just unfair to border patrol people. the fact of the matter is -- and to suggest that obama doesn't care about this i think is really not -- >> who is saying that? >> "the washington post" over the weekend did a huge story, said for two years this administration was warned about this huge migration of these minors into this country and they ignored it one year, ignored it the next. and actually behind everybody's back, they secretly funded these facilities, and even advertised

for jobs at dhs to help the minors come across, and they did it. this is what "the washington post" said, they did it because obama's re-election was too important and they wanted to pass comprehensive immigration refo reform. that's not what i say, that's what "the washington post" says. >> they advertised for jobs? >> in january, 2014 they advertised jobs for dhs agents to deal with an expected 60,000 illegal alien minors coming across. the fact that the obama administration all of a sudden says we were surprised by this is just not true. >> in addition to that, just to add to that, asking the american people for another $3.7 billion to deal with an emergency that they actually could see coming is what i think is difficult. but more than that, i heard today that the white house isn't even backing its own bill because democrats on the hill pushed back against it. now what they're asking for is a clean $4 billion to help deal

with the crisis with no policy reform. i think that contributes to people having less confidence in their government. >> i would say that obama has put more resources, more money, more people on that border than any other president. >> to no effect? is the incompetence so great -- >> drug traffickers. >> you have to do more then. that wasn't sufficient. if somebody is bleeding on the operating table, get in, all hands in to stop the bleeding. you don't say i tried now but it is still really bad. that's what you're saying, do more. >> what's going on is reflecting greater ideology. you can't just say he's sending people back when legal immigrants are getting driver's licenses. we are creating new rules for people that are -- these are undocumented to use the politically correct phrase. we're creating pull factors for people from other countries to come here. they know they can get all of

the benefits for free. >> wouldn't you? >> there's no better country than the united states for me to flee to. >> somebody else needs to step up and be awesome, too. next, the widow of a chain smoker won $23 billion for the death of her husband. has personal responsibility gone up in smoke? we will debate ahead. unlimited cash back. let that phrase sit with you for a second. unlimited. as in, no limits on your hard-earned cash back. as in no more dealing with those rotating categories. the quicksilver card from capital one. unlimited 1.5% cash back on everything you purchase, every day. don't settle for anything less. i'll keep asking. what's in your wallet?

♪

michael johnson senior from florida died of lung cancer in 1996 after two decades of chain smoke. a jury awarded his widow 23 billion in damages. the company that has to pay up, rj reynolds tobacco. the case one of those in florida after the state supreme court tossed out a $145 billion class action verdict in 2006. stuart varney sat down with the man's lawyer and asked about the case. >> should we be trying to put tobacco companies out of business with a lawsuit? >> we should send them a message, they can make a safer cigarette, they may make a few less dollars, they should do it. you have to give people a right to make an informed decision. >> everybody knows -- >> not everybody. >> how could you not know? >> what about a ten-year-old? >> how many die of cirrhosis of the liver because they drink

alcohol. >> you cannot withhold information about the product that's detrimental and people rely on it to their detriment. >> unbelievable. kimberly, a legal perspective. no one put a gun to his head, said smoke two packs a day. he was in his 30s, he was warned about it on labels his whole life. i'm sorry he died, put that out there, but don't they understand personal responsibility in the courtroom? >> answer, no, they don't understand personal responsibility. be very careful when you pick juries. a lot of them were very young. >> crazy, mentally ill. sorry. >> so perhaps there are issues with life experience and not understanding the gravity of making an award like this. yeah, you choose what you do, what you drink and what you eat and who you spend time with, et cetera, et cetera. in this case, they went way overboard, and i believe this will be severely reduced or

overturned by the court. >> bob, let me ask you a question, maybe he can reconcile this. the left wants to basically bankrupt big tobacco, but the west also wants to legalize marijuana. you're a smoker, can you explain that to me? >> i smoke cigars, slightly different. i don't think they want to bankrupt tobacco companies, but there was a huge national verdict against the tobacco companies. i take it this 136 billion florida turns out was their share of that? >> there's a precedent established to show awards like this are disproportionate, cannot be kept, and they have to be kept as a matter of public policy, then you have everyone suing -- >> huge class action against the tobacco company so they offered up, and florida refused to take it. i don't think this is going to stand up. i think the fact is the guy already got 17 million, his estate did. what more do they need. >> is this a slippery slope, are people going after big alcohol, big sugar.

>> big cars, my example. if i bought a porsche and drove it 116 miles -- >> go after big wheels. >> i was racing my big wheel fast i have been told not to, and i kill somebody, would big wheel be in trouble or would i be responsible for that? >> big engine. >> what do you think? >> this is actually hysteria, when you think of it. this is so far beyond what's considered mentally stable. they're in the punitive hysteria. this is like fainting spells among school kids, you know what i mean, or the witch trials. this is insane. this is where the concept of everything in life traces back to these litigating ninjas that create these incredible settlements. it has to stop. and also, i hate the idea of sending a message.

justice is not about sending a message, it is about basically punishing somebody for a specific act. you want to send a message, you write a book, make a phone call. you don't punish somebody to send a message to a community at large, because that's unfair to the person you're punishing. it is completely wrong. you don't comment on the larger phenomenon, punish the single person. this is sad, strange, weird, destroying society, it may make me take up smoking again. coming up, the world's second richest man says the rest of us are working too much. find out what he's suggesting we do to change our lives. and it is right up bob's alley next.

test

the world's second richest man had some advice for all of us. i think we should listen to them. carlos slim is worth more than $80 billion according to forbes. he just said at a business conference we're all working too much. i agree. he thinks our workweek should be slimmed down to three days instead of five. the day should be longer, 11 hours and you probably have to retire a little later. i think that there's something to be said about this. granted the guy is a gazillionaire. if you add this up, 33 hours a week. >> i think he's trying to save his own skin here. he's the richest man in mexico. do you know how dangerous that is? if there's a revolution, they are coming to castle.

he's throwing some sugar to the pes ants. >> he doesn't want anyone else to catch up to him. work three days a week. >> it's like when you play sports against some guy, all of a sudden he takes the lead, all right, games over. >> bill gates, hey, stay home, call in sick. >> the bigger issue are we working too much? >> i think there is scientific evidence that would show that people had more time not working that they could be a little bit more productive. that doesn't mean sitting on the couch playing candy crush. give you more time to exercise or spent time with family, i think that's fair. i also think -- bob, when you say people would have to work just a little bit later, i think you told people you had to work until age 75, people wouldn't

want that. >> this is what the google guys are saying, right? who is. >> who is the richest guy in the world? >> it was gates. >> this argument is made by somebody who is unencumbered of the consequences of not working. the most important step out of poverty emotionally and physically is work, we fill ourselves with achievement so we feel good the next day. i say you are going to stop working. everybody should work until 75. >> i would say i would. >> you look at men who retire, they die -- >> i think he's talking about people who work in a mine or manual labor. i think that is maybe -- >> we got to get out of here. listen, i work three hours a day and it's very helpful. look at me. i have time to exercise -- >> i wouldn't call

time now for one more thing. let's go to ms. dana perino. hey, dana. >> glad to be here. >> stop wasting our time. get to it. >> last week we were talking about soccer but now we're talking about cricket. the cricket team is up set because they think their hotel is haunted. one of their bowlers said it was so hot in the room, i couldn't sleep, the taps turned on, the taps turned off, the lights, the whole team is asking to move to other rooms. >> they had these really high scores, 400-2. >> i don't know any cricket dudes.

in a great moment today for america, president obama bestowed the medal of honor on staff sergeant ryan pitt. look right there. this was the brave american, last soldier alive in a brutal vicious insurgent attack in afghanistan, he took heavy fire, and able to radio in he was the last one alive. president obama was able to acknowledge all the young men who died that day. me, i have not banned a phrase. spot-on. this is a british phrase. >> you never did that? >> i never did. spot-on, it means exactly correct. i food it annoying. the only time you see spot-on is

when you see an aroused dog. >> ooh. ew. >> where am i right now? >> who are you? >> i don't know. the pills kicked in. i'm seeing four of you. have i gone to you, jesse? >> i don't know. i think you should stay on. if you saw at the top of the show today, bob and i got a little heated, but that's nothing compared to what happens on jordanian television. [ speaking foreign language ] >> so, i just want to say no matter how emotional bob and i get, we would never throw chairs at you. >> don't be so sure. my one more thing -- the world

has just had its hottest june on record since they have been keeping records since 1880 which is the 353th month in a row where the heat index in the world has made a record in a row. it's got nothing to do with global warming. nothing to do with that. it just happens to be a lot of people burned fires. i don't know. >> there you go. >> there's a reason why we -- sun spots. that's what it is. >> articulate argument for climate change. >> maybe one days we could do it as a segment, instead of one more thing, so we could respond >> it is tuesday, july 22nd. brand new evidence about the missile that took down a plane packed with innocent people. pro russian rebels caved to international pressure and

loosened their grip on the crash site. >> a brazened and bold heist. robbers storming inside the casino and stealing hundreds of thousands of dollars. the hunt right now to watch them. >> do you ever say this to your boss? >> show me the money! >> hopefully not like that. the debate, would you rather have one big bonus or several smal ones? "fox & friends first" starts right now. ♪ >> good morning. sun is not quite up here on the east coast. morning.atching "fox & friends

i am ainsley earhardt. >> i am heather childers. thank you for starting your day with us. we begin with a fox news alert. right now a raging wildfire in north central washington is the largest in state history. the complex fire sparked by lightning last week burned 379 square miles. that's more than four times the size of seattle. 200 homes are destroyed and 1200 more homes in 12 towns are threatened. families are deaf stated. >> it all burned down. our retirement home that we looked forward to spending our older years in, it's gone. >> we never thought in a million years this community would go up. i am just shocked. >> one person died trying to protect his home from the flames. the fire is only 5 percent