for whining. i'm saying you go with no clothes they will rush you through. i'm just saying and there ought to be a separate line who don't know the drill. that one lady we talked to in chicago. a separate line for people who are clueless. quizzing tonight 8:00 p.m. >> pretty sure. hello everyone i'm greg gutfeld along with kimberly guilfoyle, eric bolling, dan perino and bob beckel. this is "the five." this is a fox news alert. nancy pelosi condemns the separation of church and state. >> follow the lead of the national catholic conference of bishops who talked about the baby jesus escaping violence as an infant, who talked about sending children back into the circumstances you described, sending children back into a burning building. so it's not just about having a

heart, it's about having a soul and the soul of our country is about respecting the dignity and worth of every person. >> well in that case i have no heart and no soul. i hate children especially babies. they are just hairless with cats with thumbs. glad i got that out of the way. that's what pro-am nesty types imply on anyone who favors legal over illegal immigration. starts with obama and trickles down to pelosi. you don't want these children with their teddy bears? you are satan. you are worse than satan you are a republican. compassion is code for its opposite creating policies that harm those that it's meant to help. dependence on government is compassionate but while fostering independence is not. forcing poor kids into bad public schools is compassionate while charter schools where they excel is not. so what is compassion? nancy pelosi said that

deportation would be like sending kids into burning buildings. if so why not help put those fires out. export values that create better lives in awesome countries like ours. but that's not what the amnesty preachers want. in their odd world everyone should come here but the very thing they are coming for our way of life shouldn't be inflicted on others. it's an equation that preserves pain beyond our borders as it rattles what's left of our own. what do i know. i hate babies. i just hate some babies. bob, nancy pelosi teaching compassion is like you teaching restraint. is deportation of illegals unchristian? >> first of all i usually don't talk to satan but i'll talk here for a second. i think she's hit on a point that is a, frankly not a bad sales point to be honest with you. if you try to -- you get as much emotion around this as you possibly can. it is difficult and very

difficult to take what would be perceived as punitive action against kids. ted cruz is trying to do that in the senate. the house republican bill is rife with it. we'll keep going with it satan. >> they are using children as pawns. >> that's the way you do it on the left. use a kid. if you're against the kids you're evil and horrible. regarding the christianity part, nancy pelosi. we're taught to be christian-like in your personal being. not everyone, not saying everyone has to be christian. that would be like islam. if you're not islam, if you're not with us we're going to kill you. christians believe you want to be compassionate, be compassionate. adopt a few mexican babies that's fantastic. don't tell everyone else. we don't want to adopt mexican babies. i'm a 15-year-old. i don't want to adopt any more

babies. here's the issue. at risk of getting even more death threats than i've been getting. >> any babies. you mean any babies. >> okay. mexican, canadian. >> honoduran. >> honoduran. >> beanie babies. i like beanie babies. >> 50% of all illegals are coming through the mexican border. getting back to my death threats. i do suggest increasing legal integration, quadrupling it. people hate hearing that. making it faster. because we can use low cost labor in this country. we can use four or five million more people a year into our economy. that's what killed japan was this declining birth rate and no one of coming to japan. i think it's a great idea. i welcome that. >> to follow up on what he's saying why should we be preached to say you're not a good christian unless you support amnesty and breaking the law. there's a way to do this because it's been done for years and

years by people lawfully. they want to come in, work hard, raise their families, they want to be able to have their choices to go to a public school or a charter school or do something and provide for future generations. i think you're also saying let's take care of who we have here. let's provide a legal path to citizenship that everybody ad here's to because we have plenty of babies here that need good schools and education and have illnesses and developmental problems that all have issues that we need to address as american citizens. fair? >> fair. but it is hypocrital at its heart. you have people like nancy pelosi that talk about separation of church and state. >> nancy pelosi yesterday, we played the clip of her from cnn when she was talking to candy crowley in which he is compassionately called hamas a

humanitarian organization. then pressed on whether it was a terrorist organization and she said ah-ha and not as eeqivocal as this. when the hobby lobby decision was made they said they did not have a right to bring beliefs into a policy arena. that's what she's doing today. i understand the appeal to christians. a lot of people share it. in our gallup poll 62% of people said they are for sending the children back. i don't think that's out of frustration or anger or being satan or mean. it's out of compassion. better place for these children is not languishing for years wait fog a hearing, it's better to go back to their families and have a better legal process to allow them to come in to this country. >> i hear from most conservatives and most republicans the word law.

they break the law by doing this. and it is true, in fact, the law has been broken. but also there are hundreds of thousands of u.s. businessmen who break the law every year by hiring them. do i hear one peep out of republicans or conservatives about that. i do not. no, no. >> that's what e-verify is all about. >> i would like to see somebody -- show me -- >> there's e-verify requires you to make sure that you're paying a legal immigrant. >> which means a lot are not doing it. why don't you arrest them. >> look. colorado legalized pot, right? that's breaking the law a federal law, right? >> what does that have to do? >> the point you're trying to make okay so it happens over here so we're supposed to look the other way on all illegal immigrants because some people hire them. and you don't go after the corporations. you have to stop it from the

corporate side and welfare side. >> it's all in the body of the legislation on immigration. why do we not arrest some businessmen? >> let's arrest them. first i feel like listening to charles krauthammer talking about perhaps president obama's next move on immigration and whether he'll grant it full, i guess, unilaterally legalization of 5 million or so. >> there are reports from the white house that he's going to do something by executive order about immigration. if he were to do something like legalize 5, let's say half, which is was been talked b-huge numbers of illegal immigrants it's an impeachable offense. i would be 100% against impeachment because it's political suicide but it really would be the basis for that. that's what i think the white house may actually be softening people up for an executive order that reaches impeachable offense but a way, like a preemptive

strike. >> there's a lot of things he touches on there. i want to know why is he doing this now during the border crisis and how would this work? is this all about the mid-terms? that's three questions. >> a lot of questions. >> she can do it. >> where do i start? president obama i think is trying to do this because remember what rahm emanuel said never let a crisis pass you by. however it was the white house, president obama who said we do have a humanitarian crisis on our border and something needs to be done. now he doesn't back the original bill he pushed forward. there's one today a $4 million without any reforms. do i think he's stepping over a line because you had democrats kagan and pryor two red state democrats, they are in tough races saying to the white house today please ease off because they know the american people aren't quite there. the president success

unpersuasive -- if they are floating this trial balloon out there they have a lot of catching up to do to convince people it's the right thing. maybe they will succeed but right now they are way behind. >> 60 or 70,000 kids down there right now? if i was obama, i would tell the justice department to 2k3w0e69 or 70,000 businessmen who hired these people and throw them in jail. >> your going to say -- >> yes, break the law go to jail. i agree. >> they should go to jail. >> let's move on. >> you can understand why people are confused. within the last three weeks you said you thought the children should be sent back. then all of a sudden when the politics got crazy all the democrats start saying no we can't send them back. i admire the lock step decision-making but you can understand why the american people are confused. >> if i had said they all should be sent back then i made a terrible mistake and withdraw it. but you still haven't answered

my question there's not one businessman -- wait a minute. >> why hasn't holder done anything about it in six years. >> it's your fault. obama's fault no one has been -- >> for every kid, i would arrest a businessman. >> great solution. >> no one will have jobs. their solution will be -- >> do you think they should break the law? >> what do you suggest? you suggest all the illegals come over, no one hires them and they go on the government dole and use our health care system. >> up allow people to break the law. >> i think you're right if you break the law whether a business or someone come over you get fined and punished for it. >> is anybody not saying it here. >> make them legal immigrants so we can follow them and tax them. >> fingerprint them. >> i want to know who we have

here. >> we get it, bob. charles krauthammer made an interesting point. he said the white house talked about impeachment early on as a preemptive strike so he could make this executive order. do you think that's clever? >> do i think the president is that clever? >> charles krauthammer might be more clever. >> i could listen to a whole a block sounds of charles krauthammer. with respect to the president obama i think he's that political. we didn't listen -- >> you scream at people. >> i need the miracle ear again for christmas because you're so loud today. right? >> you yell at me. i agree with you approximately >> charles krauthammer's an simple an interesting one they thought so far ahead we'll do this impeachment thing. i'm not sure they are that clever but maybe they are. however we spent an entire day yesterday as republicans trying to smother the idea of impeachment just to blow on the

embers. so they now they flame up again. >> so the right pushed back so hard. >> now they can't say. >> they can't do it. >> use the executive pen. >> you know who is smart enough to do that is karl rove. >> it's like a john grisham novel. i don't think it's an impeachable offense. charles would know more. >> 97 days out from the mid-terms. how would any immigration action this summer affect his party this november. our election predictions when "the five" returns.

less than 100 days to 2014 mid-terms and republicans have some reason for optimism. most election models give them the edge to take the senate and republicans are more interested in this election over democrats by 14 points. despite the high hopes veteran campaign strategist karl rove offered some warnings on how democrats will attempt to break this wave. >> the democrats have four advantages. incumbency. money. raising more money than the

national republican senatorial committee. democrats are focused on their ground game. they are attempting to bring out in the 2014 election people who voted in 2012 and 2008 but didn't vote in 2010 and finally, you know, look in every election you have television ads that stretch the truth. i have never seen the democrat advertising like this this year. >> let me go to greg first. do you think karl missed anything? >> yes. he mentioned four advantages but left out the major one which is the media. always near the end of an election when a republican seems to be ahead and a democrat in trouble think about the debates between romney and obama. the media will step in and pick-off the republican and save the day so the prospects are bright for republicans if you ignore one major player and that's the media. >> i'm skeptical and cautious. i want bob's take on this.

these are the, the reds are strong republican in pink toss up but leaning towards republicans and then the rest are just the ones that the democrats might be able to hold on to. bob i'm more interested in your take on this. some people think that the republicans will have a wave, a tidal wave or a tsunami but do you think it's that clear cut? >> no. it's not that clear cut. one of the things, by the way rove also made this point and i keep hearing this from republicans. democrats are going their ground game. i wonder why the republicans don't do their ground game. having said that, i don't think we should talk about the house. the house is pretty much a done deal. only question in my mind will there be seven, eight, nine, ten either way. in the senate it's a big deal and it's a big deal some say it's not that big of a deal. it takes 60 votes to defeat something in the senate.

chairmen of committees write bills that go to the floor. if you do that. it comes from the republican side. right now they have to deal with it from the harry reid side. my count today and i can't emphasize this enough. these things change and change a lot. i think right now if the election were held today trebs would win the senate 51-47 with two independents voting with democrats. i fine it difficult to believe any of those states montana, south dakota or west virginia will go anything but republican. i think you got to have to assume there's going to be out of the people who are really in trouble in arkansas, louisiana and north carolina that you're going to see two of the three of them get knocked off and those that are now in play that were not in play before from colorado to oregon to minnesota to michigan, now the democrats are more exposed than they had been before. >> another one virginia. when that race first got under

way, ed gillispie entered the race. the gap is now down to ten. >> if you're the republicans right now the ball is in your court. you got the wind behind you. you might as well play this. from obamacare to irs to bergdahl. everything is going to republicans way. play it out but don't be stupid. don't make stupid comments about libidos or contra septemberive. if republicans get the senate you can bring these bills that harry reid refuse to vote on. now president obama for the next year and a half can veto them but that's more unlikely but you get to see where people stand on things. also, there are so many -- i'll let kimberly jump in here. i think this is the time right

now. >> look if they can't do it now when can they get it right. hopefully pull it together. traditionally it's been a problem for some gop candidates to emphasize and mobilize their get out the vote opportunities and their ground campaign and also as you know historically regardless of who the president is in which party the second term of a sitting president you'll take mid-term election losses. i'm not going to be surprised by any of it but let's see if this is an indicator that the gop is getting more of their game together. >> let me ask greg about this. republicans are often accused of being too serious not having enough of a sense of a humor. do you think they should have enough confidence that maybe they could step out of their conservative blocks and try to mix it up a little bit with the people or is that too dangerous? >> i don't know. there's some young blood out there, i guess but i think it's

less important for conservatives to send a message to their own party than it is to beat the other guy. so you need to push a candidate you know can win. it's not enough just to be right. you have to be persuasively right. that's the message. that's for the long term for the survival of the republican party. >> bob there's always a surprise in every election. but you can wrap this up here. what do you think could possibly be the thing that nobody is paying attention to right now that could surprise us in november. >> they are paying attention but mcconnell going down in kentucky would be the one. >> very unlikely to happen. >> but you asked me what's a surprise. >> the first time the republicans have not nominated some real and they got a pretty good cast of characters. second thing in an off year election like this, the party that is out of power wants to

nationalize the elections. the republicans want to nationalize these issues. the incumbents and democrats want to make it this is what i can deliver. i'm an incumbent. that's an important thing. i'm the high ranking on this committee, that committee. the problem is that bringing something home from washington right now is like bringing home eboli. >> we'll take your money. >> if that was a compliment that would be more deadly. i thought it was eboli. >> eboll gentlema and e. coli. >> next up on our biology lesson on "the five" all kind of celebrations in colorado after pot was legalized but the state's biggest city has a big problem on its hands. kimberly will explain this next. >> yes.

♪ pot has been legal now since january in colorado and most people think it's fun and games as jesse waters found out. >> what's your daily routine? >> i wake up, smoke a boll, go to sleep. >> how much do you smoke? >> daily. >> what do you do for a job? >> i don't do anything. >> just a little bit of weed smoke can kind of hurt your brain. >> wait, what? so you have to smoke a lot is that it?

>> all right. b but legalization is creating problems. it's leading to an influx of homeless people to the city. >> they are experimenting. i hope they are not playing with fire. i guess if they want to give it a shot. >> otherwise they will go up in smoke. >> i don't know you can split the legalization baby. let's make it fully legal or not. i think you'll see a federal push very soon. i admire the white house who has stuck to the science which is the science they tried to apply towards other things like tobacco or climate change but on this one they are saying actually smoking dope does cause some harm. let's not ignore that on this quick march to legalize. >> bolling, you making that sideways. >> no. it's still illegal federally to smoke weed and what colorado has done, we don't care. it's better for our state to do this. i'm all for that. first four months of the year.

$210 million in legal pot sales that will generate somewhere around $30 to $35 million in tax revenue. >> that they have to spend on the homeless. >> and maybe less in jails. i don't know. i'm all for it. i like states picking and choosing what they want to do. >> different states. you're for revenue. >> it has potential to be quite a bit of revenue. >> for the government to stay out of your personal decision. >> first off if you believe that pot legalization was going to solve all of society's ills that's on you. you're an idiot. there will always be lazy shiftless bums pot or no pot. we keep calling these fellows homeless. they are actually young 18 to 24-year-old drifters who are basically following the high. they don't have a bindle on a stick like an old hobo.

they have a frisbee and a hockey stick. maybe they will find a job and maybe they won't. it's your choice to be loser, if that doesn't affect me that's fine. i've been hit by a lot of drunks. goal in all of legalization in general in my opinion is stop punishing people for they are searching for their kind of martini. i think this homeless thing is kind of a ruse because i don't think they are staying there. they are going there. i love jesse but he went to a marijuana festival. what your going to find at a marijuana festival. >> it seemed like second hand smoke situation. he got rid of the collar which is why i love jesse. >> you're kind of conoccurring. mr. beckel. >> if there were states all around colorado that legalized marijuana you wouldn't have

people going to denver. it's your gun control argument. >> science issue is something that needs to be dealt with. however when they say it lowers i.q. it did mine because i was stoned when i took a test. the one place that i really do think they have been lax on no doubt smoking dope and driving a car is a dangerous combination. people who smoke cars and drive cars drive 6 miles per hour because they think they are going 90 miles per hour. >> you also talk about it acgateway drug. >> some of this stuff is very powerful. you have one state in the middle of no place. once it starts spreading out you won't have these concentrations. >> the things that the government addressed which are legitimate, changes in the brain are something you have to look out for. that happens when you abuse, whether it's alcohol there's permanent changes in the brain over time. pot is addictive.

to maybe 10% of the population. drunk driving. terrible. that should be illegal. it is illegal. you should enforce it, find a way to measure it effectively. so you can tackle these things. the problem is, it's your choice to be a loser. it is not my choice to enforce those decisions. >> so the government should not step in to prevent that. >> then we should be doing that with alcohol, you name it. what about skiing. >> the addiction thing, just very quickly, addiction means that without the stauns that you are addicted to you'll go through physical changes and usually detrimental ones. marijuana if you stop smoking marijuana you won't get the dts which means it's all psychologically addictive. alcohol is physically and psychologically addictive and most other drugs. >> do you think we'll see a move to legalize it federally.

>> i think so. that's where it's headed. the tax revenue is there. >> that's what's happening. >> same thing with gay marriage. you see that is going in individual states and come across the board and that's the wave of the future with respect to marijuana. >> that's the $64,000 question. federal drug charges for, you know -- >> you have a federal law you have to address that retroactively. >> let them out. >> sure. >> we have so much to discuss on this show. next on "the five" he may have won his legal battle against the which dove a navy s.e.a.l. but jesse ventura is certainly not a winner in the court of public opinion. he thinks otherwise, though and he's taking quite a victory lap after this verdict yesterday. you'll hear from ventura coming up. but if you have arthritis, this can be difficult.

prescription celebrex can help relieve arthritis pain, and improve daily physical function so moving is easier. because just one 200mg celebrex a day can provide 24 hour relief for many with arthritis pain. and it's not a narcotic you and your doctor should balance the benefits with the risks. all prescription nsaids, like celebrex, ibuprofen, naproxen and meloxicam have the same cardiovascular warning. they all may increase the chance of heart attack or stroke, which can lead to death. this chance increases if you have heart disease or risk factors such as high blood pressure or when nsaids are taken for long periods. nsaids, like celebrex, increase the chance of serious skin or allergic reactions, or stomach and intestine problems, such as bleeding and ulcers, which can occur without warning and may cause death. patients also taking aspirin and the elderly are at increased risk for stomach bleeding and ulcers. don't take celebrex if you have bleeding in the stomach or intestine, or had an asthma attack, hives, other allergies to aspirin, nsaids or sulfonamides. get help right away if you have swelling of the face or throat, or trouble breathing. tell your doctor your medical history. and ask your doctor about celebrex.

for a body in motion.

[ male announcer ] that's why there's ocuvite to help replenish key eye nutrients. ocuvite has a unique formula not found in your multivitamin to help protect your eye health. ocuvite. help protect your eye health. ocuvite. when folks think about wthey think salmon and energy. but the energy bp produces up here creates something else as well: jobs all over america. engineering and innovation jobs. advanced safety systems & technology. shipping and manufacturing. across the united states, bp supports more than a quarter million jobs. when we set up operation in one part of the country, people in other parts go to work. that's not a coincidence. it's one more part of our commitment to america.

suing the widow of an american hero makes jesse ventura not a chump but a greedy fool. jesse ventura, ladies and gentlemen. >> i'm already damaged. i can't go to a s.e.a.l. reunion any more. that was one place write always felt safe. i can't go there any more. i would be looking over my shoulder now wondering who is going to come after me next. >> jesse ventura you call yourself a s.e.a.l. the jury is still out on that one. you don't deserve to call yourself a s.e.a.l. here's a real s.e.a.l. sums it up, i sue wives of fallen heroes. >> it's awful. he waits until chris kyle dies and sues the widow in court and gleefully takes this victory lap. it's disgusting. they should set aside this verdict. she's going to go ahead and appeal it and she should.

do i not feel that they met the legal standard here. how can you say when you have 11 navy s.e.a.l.s testifying to what chris kyle say happened and then say chris kyle acted in clear and convincing evidence against a public figure by telling a bold faced lie. it was a split decision 8-2. >> they are looking at damages because he said chris kyle's actions ruined his future career. i think jesse ventura's actions. >> i don't want to the lone voice here. i'm not a jesse ventura fan. if in fact this guy did say that jesse hated america, thought that america was killing women and children in iraq and the s.e.a.l.s deserved to lose a few, if in fact that's what he said then that's grounds for and should be awarded a compensation. now if they had 11 people go there and say that's exactly what he said these jurors can't be stupid.

they must lack evidence ventura is right and did not say that he deserves to get what he got. >> chris kyle is saying that jesse ventura made those statements, therefore, he punched him. did not use his name in the book. went on shows like o'reilly and identified ventura. that's where the damage comes in to the tune of $1.28 million. the amount is excessive. the evidence is not uncontroverted it's inconsistent. number three the defense attorney of the widow said okay go ahead, we'll accept a split verdict instead of unanimous one. big mistake. don't ever accept a bad hang. >> can we now watch jesse ventura and see what he does with this $1.8 million award. should we? >> i never watched jesse ventura before anyway. >> you loved "predator." you said it was your favorite movie. >> i hated that show.

ventura said he brought the lawsuit based on principle. i hope the widow gets as much pro bono support as she needs to bring it and see what a jury would say based on what kimberly just said. sounds like the jury got it wrong. >> they should have said unanimous verdict. >> jesse may be legally within his bounds to bring this. but is he a jerk for doing it. >> it's the same argument we had about the ground zero mosque no one questioned the legality of them setting up the mosque we just questioned the sensitivity of it. so obviously ventura can sue because he felt he was being slandered. he's claiming this was never said about him. you can loathe him for it but can't forbid him. i can't stand this guy. not for this. he's a truther. the guy was the loudest truther. he's got more screws loose in a hardware store in an earthquake.

i would blame the jury for this more than him. and he was s.e.a.l. and he has blurred the distinction. and he was frogman a part of the underwater demolition team which merged with the s.e.a.l.s but that was after he left. >> you said something in fact the mosque was a thing. it was going built. the question here is did in fact jesse ventura say these things. >> that's the argument. >> in fact eight of ten people say no. then the guy has grounds to get money. >> if that's the reason why people aren't booking him on tv shows he's out being hired on television networks, which is the only reason -- >> the law is supposed to be blind. >> chris kyle wasn't able to come in to court and testify. in a video deposition which is not the same as live testimony. >> call chris kyle wrong but award jesse ventura zero dollars. >> just because he's jesse ventura? >> no. >> because he's a jerk.

>> jesse if you sue me wait until i'm dead and go after adrian. should marriage be a two year commitment instead of forever. many young adults said they would be incliklined to sign fo that. we'll tell you what we think next. at aarp.org/possibilities

as long as i've lived in iowa, (strauss' blue danube playing) save hundreds on beautyrest and posturepedic. at sleep train, choose $300 in free gifts with tempur-pedic.

even choose 48 months interest-free financing on the new tempur-choice. the triple choice sale ends soon at sleep train.

>>. should marriage get a test run before the real commitment sets in. according to a new study a lot of millennials are not keen on until death do us part. a lot would rather try out the beta model. two year trial where you finalize it or dissolve it. let's keep going. that's it. there are two other models one was do a five, ten, 15 year deal or presidential model which is four years. what do you think, eric? >> i think presidential is eight years if i'm not mistaken. the test run is okay, live for your suppose for a little while. make sure there are things that don't drive you crazy. >> as boyfriend and girlfriend. >> once you do it, do it for

life. i'm 17 years in. blissfully married. >> you've been married twice. >> no. >> you did two ceremonies. >> you had ten. this is bob's favorite subject matter. i have a witness here. >> you have more experience in this than anybody else. what do you think. >> thank you for asking. such a charming question. here's the deal. i think you should be very certain when you get married, the best that you can. you're going into it with a really fully informed decision that you've gone to counselling ahead of time. work out your issues, this is from the benefit of my experience. make sure you are compatible financially and personally. that's what date cigarette for. that's what in some ways engagement, taking that next step and then be real certain. >> greg, if you proposed one of

these ideas to your wife what do you think would happen? >> a beta marriage is two years and i've been married for ten years, i'm a master beta. this is worse for women than men because the world is kinder to an ageing man in the reproductive process. if you span a two year marriage for a woman in her 20s harder for a woman in the reproductive process he can continue to have kids. bad idea for women primarily. >> that's the last thing we'll agree upon. >> i like the way you rode that. >> i think this is a regrettable experiment. i think it does reflect some of the millennial generation's description of being afraid of

commitment, risk averse. i think there's something to be said about an old-fashioned traditional marriage it's wonderfully fulfilling. half of marriages end in divorce. i'm still dying over that. >> don't say it. >> nothing bad. it's completely normal >> you're a master. i get it. there's a difference between dating and being married. you choose your family. it's hard. once you get through the first year is tough. then the tenth year is tough. once you're through that you're good to go. >> two things. you want to succeed, get a dog. >> you got to learn what it's like to be married. i came home after i was married, we lived in hours she was scrubbing the bathroom floor. i said are we moving.

one more thing is up next.

thank ythank you for defendiyour sacrifice. and thank you for your bravery. thank you colonel. thank you daddy. military families are uniquely thankful for many things, the legacy of usaa auto insurance can be one of them. if you're a current or former military member or their family, get an auto insurance quote and see why 92% of our members plan to stay for life.

♪ >> time for one more thing. i started off with a bad phrase, unacceptable. i hate hearing this word. when you're looking for something i'm sorry sir it's unacceptable. unacceptable to you. it's unacceptable to use the phrase unacceptable especially in politics because that

requires work to be done. >> can you say not acceptable. >> no, you can't. you're next. >> have you ever been suckered into a big nutrition trend because you thought it would make you healthy or lose weight. that was me and coconut water. >> oh, my god. >> it has an acquired taste. i've learned to love it. today i read in the "new york times" coconut water is changing its claims. it's not as healthy as they claimed. you might like the taste but don't kid yourself you're being healthy by drinking it. i have to recommend the coconut water war story about two guys who got it going is really good in the "new york times" business section on sunday. >> some fun weekend reading. i'm so happy because i never did the coconut thing. >> now you don't have to. >> let's have a little adorable video that i'm sure greg will

hate. >> i love it. >> this is alex miller that uploaded the video of a 5-year-old little girl who loves to pieces her little baby brother and oh, so sad. take a look. >> i don't want him to grow up. you are so cute. i love his little smile. oh, my god. he's little. >> wait until she's 14. holy cow. >> exactly. >> that's my sister still saying to me. >> that's what we say about you bob. >> eric. >> i love bringing you great tv, guilty pleasures like walking dead but tonight watch this. >> it's happening again. >> i'll show you what it means to be "new york." >> something bites us we bite back.

>> we got to work quick before the twisters merge. >> so tonight shauft dva sharknado 2. sci-fi 9:00 p.m. >> bob? >> you got me into that. you went to that house of thorns thing. i bought the whole thing and it's terrible. >> "house of cards." >> game of throne. >> house of thorns is a better idea. >> this is a very big important announcement that will not normally be covered on this show. the second quarter gdp expanded to 4% more than happened any time in the last decade. congratulations a little belated but the obama recovery is with us. we should be happy. everything is doing very well and will go down as one of the great economic presidents of all

time. >> is this a joke. are we on "saturday night live." >> longest recovery ever. >> up guys can't handle it. >> don't forget to dvr. you'll never miss an episode of "the five." we'll be back tomorrow. i think. "special report." for an embattled president of the united states, some good news for once on the economy. this is "special report." good evening i'm bret baier. a president who makes no secret of his love for basketball is celebrating what appears to be big rebound. the u.s. economy grew at a 4% annual clip in the second quarter, much better than expected. it comes after a sharp decrease in economic activity in the first three months of the year. that turns out was not quite as bad as first