doug's new book "the means" is out tonight. you will love it. you too have the power to change your life and have happiness in our limited time here. i'm megyn kelly. this is "the kelly file." welcome to hannity. this is a fox news alert. high tengs during a senate armed services committee hearing on the threat that isis poses to the homeland. the top u.s. military leader left the door open to possible boots on the ground to fight against these terrorists, protesters interrupted the proceeding early and often to voice their opposition to the war. take a look at some of the highlights from today. >> any doubt in your mind that if isil had the capability to kill million of americans they would do so? >> they'll kill anybody who doesn't conform to their narrow

ideologic ideological. >> isis has global aspirations. isil's leaders have threatened america and our allies. >> you know any major arab ally that embraces -- >> i know major arab allies who fund them. >> thankyou. would you please leave in would you please leave the room now? general, general dempsey. >> this coalition is the appropriate way forward, but if it fails to be true and if there are threats to the united states, i would go back to the president and make a recommendation that would include the use of military groundmáhñ forces. >> you thing these people you're training will only go back to fight against isil? do you really believe that, general? >> if the objective were to destroy isis within 90 days, wa would be required to carry that

out? >> that's not possible, senator. >> is it fair to say that if we do not contain this threat and eventually destroy it, that it gets worse over time and a year from now, if they're still flourishing in syria, and this coalition hasn't come about, america's more in danger of a major attack than we are today? >> yes. now, just a moment, texas senator ted cruz and florida senator marco rubio will join me with reaction to that hearing and more. first, i want to say more about the dire situation isis has created for the united states and the world. we're now facing a terrorist organization that's the largest, the best fund and the best armed in history. it controls much of two nations, syria and iraq. they're at war with the united states. they beheaded americans. they said they'd meet us in new york. we have a president and administration whose incompetence is unparalleled in american history. in my opinion it ranks as one of if not the most inept that we've ever had.

let me focus on the utter chaos related to our policy regarding isis. remember, when the president discussed this group back in january, he referred to them as the, quote, jv team. that's when mixed messages started flowing from the white house, flipping and flopping over what actions should be done in regard to these terror groups. watch. >> our objective is clear and that is to degrade and destroy isil so it's no longer a threat, not just to iraq but also the region and the united states. we know that if we are joined by the international community we can continue to shrink isil's sphere of influence, its effectiveness, its financing, its military capabilities to the point where it is a manageable problem. our objective is clear. we will degrade and ultimately destroy isil.

>> remember, just a few weeks ago one of the most xarsing moments of his presidency, the leader of the free world admitted that he did not have a strategy for defeating isis. and not only that, he even acknowledged that because of preconditions that he set himself, america can't possibly defeat the terror network. the confusion may begin at the top but it does not end there. that brings me to example number three. late last week secretary of state john kerry and national security adviser susan rice refused to say that we are at war with isis. watch this. >> is the united states at war with isis? it sure sounds from the president's speech that we are. >> i think that's the wrong terminology. what we're doing is engaging in very significant counterterrorism operation. >> it sounds like a war to me. it is fair to call it a war? >> well, wolf, i don't know whether you want to call it a war or sustained counterterrorism campaign or i think frankly this is a counterterrorism operation. it will take time. it will be sustained.

we will not have american combat forces on the ground. >> the problem is the same day both the white house and the pentagon said that we were at war with isis. so we have multiple voices in the same administration saying the exact opposite thing. example four. the top u.s. military commander in the middle east asked for special forces to be sent to the region, but that request was flat-out rejected by the president. instead, 475 more troops are being deployed to help train the iraqi and kurdish forces. is that enough? the answer is no. just this morning the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff put the prospect of boots on the ground, he put it back on the table. watch this. >> my view at this point is that this coalition is the appropriate way forward. i believe that will prove true. but if it fails to be true and if there are threats to the united states, then i, of course, would go back to the president and make a recommendation that may include the use of u.s. military ground forces. >> here's the problem. the president, in order to

appease his liberal friends, has already ruled out sending combat forces to battle isis. nrd, the commander in chief is blatantly handcuffing those military leaders and is jeopardizing this mission in its entirety. quite simply this president and its half-baked approach are at odds with what the general is recommending. fifth and final sample. our stated policy right now is he won't under any conditions work with the brutal regime in syria. but we're willing to work with the brutal regime in iran. this is utter and complete chaos. the president has gotten lost in a cloud of confusion, he's weak and he's uncertain, he's afraid. he's half in and half out. an astonishing did i play. one that is totally unnerving to our allies and our foes and to the american people. according to the nbc news/"wall

street journal" poll. 70% of americans don't have much confidence that the president will succeed in eliminating isis. only 38% approve of the president's handling of foreign affairs. that is the state of the nation tonight. here with reaction is florida senator marco rubio. what are we to make with what can only be described as utter confusion here and mixed messages? we got one part of the administration saying one thing one day, another thing another day. the president one thing one day, another thing another day. what's going on here? >> first, let me explain why it's happening, then i'll tell you what its impact is. this president ran by basically bragging that he'd get us out of every conflict on the planet. he'd disengage us from the middle east. this is not uncommon among isolationists like himself. this is the reason these xroibs. he believes it's america's fault that wee have these enemies. he's bragged about it for years. now all of a sudden reality is forcing him back in. the implications are that all

these other countries we're trying to create a coalition with, especially the arab countries, they listen to his speeches but they also listen to his confougs. what they clkd is we're not really committed to a true anti-islamic terror campaign. he's going to do what he needs to do inz the short-term, but w won't see it through with this president. i really think it undermines our ability to successfully put together a coalition of nations defense this threat. >> on top of all this, now the administration said that there's going to be no boots on the ground, then listen to general dempsey and what he said, no shock and awe. i want to ask you if it's possible to win a war with this policy. listen to this. >> we'll be prepared to strike isil targets in syria that degrade isil's capabilities. this won't look like a shock and awe campaign because that's not how isil is organized but it will be a persistent and

sustainable campaign. >> it is possible -- i mean, the president stood by and watched city after city that americans shed their blood and died for, be taken over by isis. >> right. >> can you win a war with no boots on the ground, no shock and awe, is that possible? >> no, and the generals know that. they're trying to balance what they know to be right militarily and what the mandates are politically. isil isn't just a terrorist group. it's also an insurgency. they control territory take control of villages and impose shariah law. they would be local ground troops and the sunnis taking bah their villages. that's the ideal outcome about we have to be prepared for the reality that that may not come together in time, they'll have to be confronted. if it doesn't work out with the local tropes, does isil get to stay? do they continue to be able to

operate or do we do what's necessary to defeat them? and this president is clearly looking forward to leaving it to his successor to figure all that out. americans won't do anything beyond these air strikes. it's not being honest with the american people when he talks about it that way. >> we had senator mccabe on last night. he tock a report on the hill that the rebels in syria have now reached a peace agreement with isis. does that then put in jeopardy any idea of maybe supporting the rebels there with some type of munitions or should we only offer that to the kurd? s. >> it is complicated in syria. one of the reasons if we had gotten involved earlier and dent foyed with groups, it might have been easier to deal with them. not easy, easier. but unfortunately these groups have degraded. as far as that peace agreement is concerned, there was a couple of reports about thatp about a significant number of reports

that dispute that including from the free syrian army element to say that isn't true. i still believe there are groups that we can work with in syria, but they need a lot of help. these groups are smaller than they used to be, less equipped, poorly funded. this is not going happen overnight. this will take time. the truth is the isil threat may be moving a lot faster than the capability of the syrian rebels to keep up. we should try to do it but we shouldn't put all our eggs in that basket. it may not come together. >> do you believe that isis because of the vulnerability at their border, they would cross there? i got a briefing with governor perry, i was told that people are coming from yemen and syria and afghanistan and pakistan. >> right. >> do you think they're already here in the u.s. or do you think they would use the southern border to cross? >> sure, potentially. but not just isis. there are multiple groups that want to strike us. there are multiple other groups that are plotting the exact same things. there's a new al qaeda affiliate in the indian peninsula.

and the group in syria, there's al nusra. there's elements in pakistan that are extremely dangerous as well. here's my other point. they don't have to cross the border. some of these people because they hold european pass prts and in some instances american passports can come on an airplane. the border is certainly a concern, but so are our airports because many come from visa waiver countries that allow them immediate access to our nation. >> appreciate your time tonight. >> thank you. >> joining me with more is texas senator ted cruz. good to see you. >> sean, great to be with you. >> maybe you can shed some light, this policy of the president. your reaction. >> it's extraordinarily dangerous. from the beginning, president obama's response to isis has been fundamentally unserious. whether it is golfing while terror attacks or whether it is admitting candidly to the world that he has no strategy.

this administration is not doing the job that we need of a commander in chief to defend our nation. today we had secretary hagel, we had general dempsey before the armed services committee. i try to press them hard on the very simple question, if the objective were to destroy isis. not to degrade them, not to limit their ability, but to destroy them within 90 days, what would be militarily necessary to do that. i'm sorry to say neither gentleman could say that. general dempsey said the military can't do that. focus focused on issues of political reconciliationsed on side issues. they were more of a social worker than military leaders. >> senator, i guess, if you look at the bombings that took place yesterday, so close toghdad, but that's only because isis has now accumulated all this

territory that our troops died fighting for. >> yes. >> where is the sense of urgency for securing our border -- and we'll get into this with congressman gutierrez later. considering that it's so wide open, we're told that people from yemen, syria, afghanistan and pakistan are coming in. aren't these problems we need to solve if we want to keep the american people safe? >> absolutely. and you're right, there is no sense of urgency, no sense of seriousness. we've seen isis go from roughly 10,000 fighters to now north of 30,000. and the administration's approach -- isis right now is the face of evil. they're crucifying christians, they're persecuting christians, they've beheaded children, they've beheaded two american journalists on the global stage. they've promised to take jihad the our shores. the administration's response that they deal with this as a pr matter. drop a bomb here, send a missile here.

militarily how would we go in and kill the terrorists before they're able to take jihad to america, his answer was, well, we need to see political reconciliation. we need to change the conditions on the ground so people are not susceptible to extremism. look, it's not our job to be social workers in iraq and put them all on expanded medicaid. it is our job to kill terrorists who have declared war on america and who have demonstrated the intention and capability to murder innocent americans. >> i would add to that, secure the border? >> absolutely to secure the border. and this is an administration who resolutely refuses to secure the border. i'll tell you the morale, as you know well in the border patrol is at an all-time low because the political appointees are telling them not to do their job. and sean, what we ought to see in the senate this week -- i've introduced legislation that provides that any american who takes up arms with isis has through doing so forfeited his

or her u.s. citizenship. we should not be letting people with u.s. passports come back from fighting with isis and carry out acts of terror here. >> all right. >> senator, good to see you. appreciate it. we'll have you back soon. coming up, my exclusive one on one interview with president obama's brother. but first, disturbing images displayed at last week's muslim parade in new york city. and new warning signs that isis is planning to infiltrate our southern border. i'll go one on one with congressman gutierrez. [ female announcer ] we help make secure financial tomorrows a reality for over 19 million people. [ alex ] transamerica helped provide a lifetime of retirement income. so i can focus on what matters most.

[ female announcer ] everyone has a moment when tomorrow becomes real. transamerica.

welcome back to hannity. shocking scenes in a parade over the weekend. participants were seen carrying guns until police stopped them. images displayed on clothing and several trucks during this parade. the most disturbing scene was this demonstrané with a mannequin dangling from a noose. just last week a senior homeland security official confirmed that the terror group may be attempting to enter america through the southern border. watch this. >> haven't there been recent reports of twitter of facebook of messages that would urge infiltration into the united

states across our southwestern border? >> yes, sir, there have been twitter social media exchanges among isil across the globe speaking about that as a possibility. >> would you view it as a threat? >> certainly any infiltration across our border would be a threat. >> with that reaction congressman gutierrez. welcome back to the program. >> nice to be with you, sean. >> i sat in a briefing when i went down to the border the last time with governor perry, and they're catching people with syria, from yemen, from afghanistan, from pakistan. i'm now viewing not controlling our border as a dereliction of duty by our elected officials. do you agree with me? >> i think that controlling our border is paramount to our security. we have more border patrol agents than we've ever had

before. and we're catching more people than ever before. >> but it's not secure -- it's not impenetrable? >> probably the border will never be completely secure. >> why not? >> terms of -- well, because there will be people who try to enter the united states because there are hundreds of miles of porous border, but we need to continue to -- but let me just say this, look, i get the whole stuff of the border and the fixation with the border. but the fact is, sean, that at the current moment there are 2,000 jihadists with isil that don't -- aren't going to come across the border. you know how they're going to come here? they're going to come here with visas. >> i agree with that, too. >> no, but -- let me just say, i know what briefing you went to with the governor. >> you do. >> let me tell you -- sean, if i could just -- i'm a member of the intelligence committee. i get briefed by the intelligence united states of government.

but we can walk and chew gum, can't we? >> the threat isn't a jihadist coming through the border. the greatest threat is simply getting on an airplane because we don't need a visa. they can simply come. >> congressman, i agree with you. but here's my question back to you. if we have an open border where people, we see them crossing and we're catching people from syria, yemen, afghanistan and pakistan, do you not see that as a clear, real present danger to the united states? >> look -- >> answer that, answer that. is that a clear and present danger to the united states? >> sean, sean, sean, sean, any threat and any ability the terrorists have to gain access to the homeland -- >> then why don't we control it? >> sean, but sean, that's what you're saying that it's not controlled. >> it's not. >> i get that point. >> i was there. i've been down there ten times. >> i've been to the border too,

sean. let me just say one thing. the senate bill that mccain voted for and the junior senator of arizona voted for and i think they're pretty committed to border patrol, they said that that was the best way to secure the border. that is to say, apart from the premise to secure the border, we need to do that before we move on anything with immigration. my point of view is without immigration reform you cannot secure the border. >> last word. you can pass a bill, secure the border first, would you support that? >> no. >> no, okay. >> because it would be folly. i would be derelekt in my duty -- >> every day you don't pass that bill. >> i would be derelict to my duty. >> it doesn't sound great. it sounds good. >> effective. >> dereliction of duty. >> sean, this is a commission report. they said this is what they had, their ability to get valid u.s.

visas. >> i got it. do both. i agree with you. >> coming across the border. >> secure the border. >> isil gets a million dollars a day. they're putting them first class and sending them to america and they could be american just like you or i. >> if i something happens, i will blame members of congress for not doing their job. if something happens. >> because every night i get that part. i am here to protect america. >> i am, too. >> you love this one. >> i love this country. >> i love this country too. >> i think it's wrong for you to cast aspersions about people. >> i've got to run. a new report reveals that aides to hillary clinton removed key documents about the benghazi terror attack all in an effort to protect her political future. coming up next, the two members of the security team on the ground that night in benghazi of the attack. they're going to respond to that report. later president obama's brother mark is here for an exclusive interview. i never thought i'd have an obama in the studio, but i do. that's straight ahead.

hard it can be...how ...to breathe with copd? it can feel like this. copd includes chronic bronchitis and emphysema. spiriva is a once-daily inhaled... ...copd maintenance treatment... ...that helps open my airways for a full 24 hours. you know, spiriva helps me breathe easier. spiriva handihaler tiotropium bromide inhalation powder does not replace rescue inhalers for sudden symptoms. tell your doctor if you have kidney problems, glaucoma, trouble urinating, or an enlarged prostate. these may worsen with spiriva. discuss all medicines you take, even eye drops. stop taking spiriva and seek immediate medical help if your breathing suddenly worsens, your throat or tongue swells,... you can get hives, vision changes or eye pain, or problems passing urine. other side effects include dry mouth and constipation. nothing can reverse copd. spiriva helps me breathe better. sfx: blowing sound. does breathing with copd... ...weigh you down? don't wait ask your doctor about spiriva handihaler.

check it out for himself, so he came in on a sunday in this basement room, he says underneath the joggers entrance and asked the office director who technically worked for him but he'd not been consulted he says about her assignment what was going on. and she said we're to separate, according to him, any documents that could prove embarrassing or damaging to the seventh floor and the front office. seventh floor being secretary of state hillary clinton or top advisers. he says he asked her, but isn't that unethical, and he says she replied, ray, those are our orders. >> that's sharyl attkisson explaining the attempts to conceal documents from the review board cast with investigating the benghazi cover-up. here are two members of the wen ghazi security team. they co-authored the brand new

book "13 hours, the inside account of what really happened in benghazi." what's your reaction to that? >> sean, thanks for having us. >> yeah, thanks, sean. >> it's something that needs to get looked into. if there's an inkling of truth to this, which we hope that trey gowdy will get to, it will upset americans on both sides of the aisle. it's hard to accept this as standard operating procedure. >> first of all, it needs to be validated which is what, you have a good reporter on that, as ms. at kissen is, but if you're in a leadership position and there's a question of your ethical values in question, do you really need to be in that leadership position? it's something that if we were going in and our ethics were questioned as far as military

goes, we'd lose rank. definitely a big dole. >> you both were on the program last week. you'll be back tomorrow to analyze the hearing. because you told a very different story. you told me there was no youtube video connection, this was not a spontaneous demonstration. everything we were told was a lie. you also said, kris in particular, that you were given a stand-down order. >> yes. >> let me play for you at a6q presser early today democratic members of congress that dispute what you on the ground got as an order. i want you to respond to this. >> myths continue to be brought up and one of the big ones is the whole issue of a stand-down order, which was never given. >> some of these questions that have been repeatedly asked and answered were asked again in the wake of a campaign to promote a new book. both the house and senate intelligence committees interviewed these three contractors, their supervisor and others on the ground and concluded that there was no improper stand-down order. to second guess these decisions made in the fog of battle is

both unfair to the brave personnel involved and highly irresponsible. >> could you guys, kris, i'll start with you, you risked your life. you risked your career. >> yes. >> you purposefully disobeyed orders and you saved at least 25 people's lives that night, you and other people. they pretty much said you're a liar. how do you respond to that? >> well, sure makes me a bit angry. but i do know what happened that night. i do know what i told the committee when i was interviewed or went in front of the hipsi. i told them the same thing i told you on your show. yes, ways told to wait, a stand-down order took place. for them to call it a myth or for them to say it's a disservice to us or to the guys on the ground, i really think what they're coming up with now is a disservice to myself and mark and tig. it happened. i don't know ho they're talking

to, i don't know what agendas they have. our agenda is not to sell a book. that's not the reason we did the book. it was to honor ty and glen and the gentlemen on the ground and to tell the truth of what happened. >> what's your reaction, mark? >> very similar. i mean, it's upsetting that this -- they use the terminology the myth. they talk about the last individual that spoke talked about the bravery of the people on the ground, but then he's discrediting us who were the eye witnesses who were there. you know, there's been -- call it a stand-down, call it a wait. they held us back for 20, 25 minutes. >> and people died as a result of that. and they weren't there and they're calling heroes a liar. we'll have more on this tomorrow with both of you guys and have both of you responding to the hearing tomorrow. after all, you were there and they weren't.

thank you, sirs, appreciate it. >> thank you. >> coming up, more and more woes for the nfl after reporting surface that adrian peterson was accused of another one of his children back in 2013. our panel of experts weigh in. coming up next, i never thought i'd announce that obama is going to be in my studio. the president's brother mark 5í

welcome back to hannity. president obama never hid his desire for the rich to spread the wealth and give their fair share. here's a small sample. take a look. >> it's not that i want to punish your success. i want the make sure that everybody who is behind you they have the chance at success, too. when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody. is everybody is getting a fair shot, everybody has a chance to do better. kykykqac

share. kykykqac americans who can afford it should pay their fair share. fair play and shared responsibility. i think that's a fair approach. americans who can't afford it should pay their fair share. fair play and shared responsibility. that's what we're about. that's part of what my brother's keeper needs to be is just one more tool that you have to expand your network of people who can support you. >> does the multimillionaire president practice what he mç:pn preaches? joining me with the book "an obama's journey" president obama's half-brother mark obama is with us. got to meet you yesterday. we had a good discussion on radio. >> we did. we covered a lot of topics. >> we did. >> we even included some music. >> because you're a musician and an artist. >> yes. >> i think you look like your brother a lot. >> well, he looks like me.

>> all right. you guys share the same father. you sound like him. you laugh like him. >> i do. there's a connection. >> there is. >> we have the same dad, sean, and you know, we're part of a big family. as you know. >> you first got in contact with your brother in 1988. you were born in 1964. >> '65. >> sorry. >> i don't want to age you. why did you not connect before then? >> you know, when i was growing up in kenya, my father barack obama sr., we had a history of domestic violence for seven or eight years. and it was ag destructive event in my life. basically i wanted nothing to do with the obama name for a long period after that because i couldn't protect my mom. he was brilliant, but he was a tortured man. and it took 20 -- 15 years before i met barack for first

time in 1988. when i write about it, it was a very intense meeting. >> you talk in the book how you were more willing to accept your father's flaws than barack. >> mm-hmm. >> by the way i never thought i'd have an obama on the show. >> well, i think in the future, you know, if we work -- if we work it out some how, maybe we can have some other obamas. >> can you make that happen? >> you have to treat some of us nice. >> have i not been nice to you? >> you've been very nice to me. you've been very gracious. you're a person who is truly trying to understand, understand our family. i appreciate that. i know you also want your million of listeners to also understand more because -- >> i do. >> we want america to move in the same direction. >> i see your brother as a rigid somewhat radical ideologue. >> okay. >> i think he was shaped by the likes of frank marshall davis and jeremiah wright and i talked a lot about that. >> yes.

>> you talk a lot in your book and in "dreams of my father," his book, a lot of talk about race. >> yes. >> and how being of mixed race impacted both of you. how did it impact you and how do you think it impacted him? >> the issue of race particularly for mixed race kids is very powerful and very strong. in our global economy, things are becoming much more inte fwrated. we've got different races and cultures getting closer together, marries and so forth. the reason i wrote this book was to tell my story, not to have other people tell it for me. barack did the same thing. i respect him in the sense that he was trying to use the book for his own purposes and also for his own identity. that said, i know that when i was growing up, a lot of things in terms of my african culture, i'm half black, half white. i did not accept it because i associated it as a child, when you're this high, with my father who -- and i couldn't protect my mother. and i remember the thuds and the

screams and not being able to help her in any way. and that's something which affected me and movedm8%ou towas western culture. i loved ba ed beethoven, bach, welzer. he was a person brought up in ta culture, in white america. i think when he was coming to kenya, that balmy summer 20-odd years ago, he was trying to find out more about his african roots. the book talks about that. >> what are we to make of the fact that here you're his brother and you've met, but you haven't had a lot of contact. how many times have you been with him now? you talk about it in the book, first met in '88 and met before the inauguration. how many times? >> we've met a number of times. >> what was the number? >> the most significant times have actually been about three of them. and those were the first ones in

beiji beijing, then also in austin, texas. we've been in contact since this presidential election and so forth. the most recent was actually at the last inauguration. >> but i played all this about spread the wealth and everybody is paying their fair share and americans can afford to pay more and be our brother's keeper. there are five siblings from your father. >> yes. >> so in all honesty it's less than a dozen the times you've been around your brother. he's the president of the united states. >> yes. >> you have another brother that i would categorize -- you took issue with me on the radio lives in a hut, has no money. he did an interview with dinesh d'souza's movie. shouldn't that brotherly love started a home? he's a millionaire and has a brother that doesn't have any money in kenya. i said at the time i'd give him a thousand dollars, give him something. yet he doesn't help that

brother. is that hypocritical? >> let me share with you, there are lots of things that good on in families which are not public. a lot of people don't know, for example, that barack was one who helped a lot of the poorer relatives in kenya come to washington, d.c., you know, for the first inauguration. it was a very special time. you know, for a country like kenya, which is a developing country as opposed to a developed country like the united states, there are huge ery important. >> shouldn't he help his brother who doesn't have any money? >> my understanding is that barack has helped in a number of ways, but maybe not so obviously. >> sounds like, my brother's keeper, let me ask you a last question. >> sure. >> you talk a lot in your book about your ground. >> i hope you liked it. >> it's interesting to me because i feel like i have a pretty keen understanding of your brother. >> thank you. >> how do i say this delicately? i can't say it delicately.

i think that your brother does not have the capacity to grow as a president and politician. i find him incapable of÷fy abandoning what i believe are radical socialist views. how do you see him. >> well, that's the greatest of america, isn't it? we all have different points of view. >> you're his brother. do you feel like you need to defend him or you feel like it doesn't matter? >> i don't think barrack needs me to defend hm. he's strong. >> but if somebody says something about my sister, i'm going to jump and defend them. >> let me say this, in all fairness, he's a person that has a talent that's not about growing. some people develop certain thing. some people are born with music, some people are born to speak on the air like you do. but there are some people like barack that can inspire people. >> i think he brainwashed them. >> he inspired them. but that's a rare thing. especially when you consider that a lot people in the world,

they need hope. >> i think he didn't live up to the hype. the speeches were great, the teleprompter was great. the green columns were great, but he didn't live up to the hype. fewer americans are working, the economy never recovered. he seems paralyzed to deal with isis. i don't know. i'm just -- i agree he did captivate a nation, but i don't think he did follow through. is that a fair criticism or unfair? we got to go. real quick. >> my feeling is that it needs to be corrected in terms of that criticism. >> fair enough. i'll leave it there. i did enjoy the book. i enjoyed meeting you as well. >> thank you. >> and thank you for coming in. >> thank you. >> coming up new allegations surface the that adrian peterson ki kuzed of abusing another child just a year ago. how should the league react?

>> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test >> test

>> test >> test >> test >> test >> take and... exhale.in... aflac! and a gentle wavelike motion... aahhh- ahhhhhh. liberate your spine, ahhh-ahhhhhh aflac! and reach, toes blossoming... not that great at yoga. yeah, but when i slipped a disk he paid my claim in just four days. ahh! four days? yep. find out how fast aflac can pay you, at aflac.com. oh, hi, cortana. you look...nice. [ cortana ] thanks. this is the new htc one m8 for windows. sleek. but, i'm more than just a pretty face. me, too. i can check your calendar, then traffic to help you make your mani-pedi on time. and you sound great too. well, i have two speakers for music. ♪ oh...i only have one. really? yes. and i'm sitting on it. ♪

right here. with a control pad that can read your handwriting, a wide-screen multimedia center, and a head-up display for enhanced driver focus. all inside a newly redesigned cabin of unrivaled style and comfort. ♪ the all-new c-class. at the very touch point of performance and innovation. ♪

with the top speedou compare of comcastrmthe top speed ofion. business dsl from the internet... phone company well, there's really no comparison. why pay more for less? call today for a low price on speeds up to 150mbps. and find out more about our two-year price guarantee. comcast business. built for business. welcome back to hannity. less than 24 hours after being reinstated by the minnesota vikings, another allegation of child abuse announced against adrian peterson from back in 2013. here with reaction 2013.

i got hit with a strap. bam, bam, bam. i and i have never been to a shrink by my father. i will tell you i deserved it. i don't want to see this guy get a felony, lose his job, he sdeefshs parenting classesé@p >> right. you needs an intervention. an intervention should be made his child had welts on his body. i got hit all the time, too. behave a new parenting consciousness now. since 1960s there has been a decrease because it doesn't work. corporal punishment doesn't work. you have lacerations on their legs, back, ankles there is scarring. that is outrageous he's a 4-year-old, sean.

>> all of the people that have used switches over the years and belts are they going to arrest everybody that ever hit their kids? >> but it's a changing time. >> changing time. >> your dad stick a -- >> my dad punched me in the face and i deserved it.ïsk >> there is a difference between spanking and child abuse. we grew up in a time. listen, i had belts, too. >> you just have to take the belt off. >> i got it like this. and i deserved it. i was a troubled kid. >> there is a standard this, is what dr. robe said. there is a standard now. if it goes beyond and it's not reasonable, that is when authorities have to step in. >> so a switch is always wrong in your view? >> qrrq)e he. >> arrest every parent that uses

a switch? >> my father should have been arrested based on today's standards? >> maybe, yes. >> that is nuts >> did you get hit with a belt? >> yes. >> you became a shrink. >> everyone did, but what lessons did adrian peterson learn? >> he went too far. i agree but don't put this guy in jail, ruin his career, give him classes >> how3 9!ñ old is he? he doesn't know better? he got hit by his father. >> 215 pounds? . >> i was not mentally bruised because my father hit me with a belt. >> your father knew when to stop. he, obviously didn't. >> [ male voice ] i'm sorry, did you say identity distribution? no. protection. identity theft protection. you have selected identity distribution. your identity will now be shared with everyone. thank you. no, no, no -- [ click, dial tone ] [ female announcer ] not all credit report sites are equal.

[ male voice ] we're good in here, howie. yeah, have a good night, brother. experian.com members get personalized help plus identity theft protection. join now at experian.com. with enrollment in experian credit tracker. feet...tiptoeing. better things than the pain, stiffness, and joint damage of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. before you and your rheumatologist decide on a biologic, ask if xeljanz is right for you. xeljanz (tofacitinib) is a small pill, not an injection or infusion, for adults with moderate to severe ra for whom methotrexate did not work well. xeljanz can relieve ra symptoms, and help stop further joint damage. xeljanz can lower your ability to fight infections,

including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers have happened in patients taking xeljanz. don't start xeljanz if you have any infection, unless ok with your doctor. tears in the stomach or intestines, low blood cell counts and higher liver tests and cholesterol levels have happened. your doctor should perform blood tests before you start and while taking xeljanz and routinely check certain liver tests. tell your doctor if you have been to a region where fungal infections are common, and if you have had tb, hepatitis b or c, or are prone to infections. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take. one pill, twice daily, xeljanz can reduce ra pain and help stop further joint damage, even without methotrexate. ask about xeljanz. even without methotrexate. is all ready the brand ofstate the year.d berkshire hathaway home services. good to know.

do you wannaa baby?like...

like a bear? how about like you're on vacation... in this place! (dolphin) sleep like you haven't seen your bed in days... no, in weeks! sleep like the kids went to nana's house... for the whole weekend! sleep like you just took zzzquil. the non-habit forming sleep aid from the makers of nyquil that helps you sleep easily, sleep soundly, and wake refreshed. because sleep is a beautiful thing.

bob will retire when he's 153, which would be fine if bob were a vampire. but he's not. ♪ he's an architect with two kids and a mortgage. luckily, he found someone who gave him a fresh perspective on his portfolio. and with some planning and effort, hopefully bob can retire at a more appropriate age. it's not rocket science. it's just common sense. from td ameritrade. that is all the time we have left this evening before you go, we hope you'll

set your drv to record "hannity" the series. thanks for joining us we'll see you back here tomorrow night. the o'reilly factor is on, tonight. >> if we reach the point where i believe our advisers should come from the iraq troops, i'll recommend that to the president. >> and that point will most likely come shortly, as almost every military expert says isis will not be defeated unless confronted on the ground by well trained troops. we'll have a factor investigation. >> it is not simply the absence of war, but the work of justice. >> pope francis speaking out against brutal terrorists but is he advocating the use of force? we'll debate it. what we know about adrian not only as a