almost into the green room that faces the south lawn. so essentially knee deep into the white house, also and almost facing the other side. this guy could have done a whole lot more harm than was let on. we're all over it tonight on fbn. hello, everyone. it's dana parino, this is "the five." in oklahoma, mark vaughn, the man who shot the beheader is a hero. but in another state, he could have been canned. oklahoma has a bring your gun to work law that prevents firms from telling workers to leave your guns at home. many states do not have that. i don't know how i feel about people walking around workloaded. but at fnc, i don't have to worry, i'm surrounded by excellent security who even scare me. media critics will mock guns at

work. but it's a simple fact that what stopped the freak was a firearm. some could say bringing guns to work could allow these weapons to fall in the wrong hands. but we cannot weaken security based on the thought that bad midwestern might hijack it. why don't feminists embrace guns, with or without a knife, bad men are bigger than women. last week in brooklyn, a woman fought off a rapist by biting them. that's how we expect women to defend themselveses with their teeth. it's not a surprise to me that this jihadist targeted women. evidence isn't hard to find, we have honor killings even here in america. when you have a death cult whose disciples are men and not wom - women- -- k.g.?

>> yeah. >> so this killer, this beheader, facebook page was full of anti-american rantses, stuff about jihad, but it's still classified as works place violence. do you think it's going to stay that way. >> look at major nadal hassan, there's a strong possibility it will. the facts and the circumstances are there to support a different and alternative finding to say that this is the new face of terror in this country. and as for the use of weapons, how many stories have we had out there people with knives and ma shut tees. we're supposed to use our teeth? what else? our heels? our shoes, why would you not want to have this kind of tool against evil. what else could have happened at that -- >> i'll never understand the idea that somehow a rape whistle inspires confidence. the rape whistle should be the

gun. you must have had guns when you were on the farm, riling? >> my cousins did, there were guns around, but they were in a cabinet in the house and in the vehicles, but they were used for stuff you do around a ranch. >> why do you -- >> like shoot beer cans. >> i know, of course. but why is it that women are -- they're expected to be uncomfortable around firearms, but if you could drive a two-ton truck, you could certainly handle a pistol, correct? >> i'm not sure. i look at some of the women who serve in combat, obviously they're not afraid to utilize the weaponry, the modern weaponry that we have. i have actually -- maybe i shouldn't say this, but i don't have a gun. i shouldn't say that, but if i did, wouldn't i be in violation of some law? and i have never felt like i needed to have one. but i would like to know that i had the option to have one, if i needed it. but this woman, it's kind of -- she -- the one that was

beheaded, i don't think she had an opportunity to find her gun in her purse or in her car and come back and shoot the perpetrator. so that's why i think it's good that the mark vaughns of the world have weapons that they know how to use effectively that they could stop. >> what if there was a female co-worker, what if i was sitting there and i had my weapon and that's why i went absolutely at an early age to gun ranges, because i want every weapon available to me against the bad guys, you have to be ready, you have to be prepared and think that way because they're out there. >> it's probably close to even the number of men as opposed to women at the gun range. it's very, very popular, women are using guns, learning how to shoot a gun just like men. my son shoots too, i'm with you on that, everyone should at least know how to shoot a firearm. why would that matter? because maybe this guy wouldn't have gone to a place where he new men and women were armed to

defend themselves. we talked about the most dangerous places in the world are gun free zones. there are thee things that cause the definition of terror, backgrounds of zealots, you go to his facebook page, and the third one, an act so horrific it instills horror and terror, so if this isn't the definition of terror, there is no definition of terror. it's time i would say for the department of justice to step in and say we have got this, this is an act of terror, we'll take it from there and hopefully they do. >> this guy's not going to do it. >> bob, i want to read you the oklahoma sheriff's statement on mark vaughn's heroism. mark didn't hesitate, he quickly responded and put an end to the threat by shooting the suspect and saving the life of the second victim who was being actively attacked by the suspect. there is every reason to believe that the lives of unfold others were saved who would have been

targeted by the suspect if it had been for mr. vaughn's actions. >> i give this guy a lot of credit, he had a gun, used it effecti effectively. should everyone who works in that blachblt, from the lowest paid person to the highest paid gun carry guns around? and should they carry them in the bars on saturday night or should they carry them to church. my problem is that it's going to get out of hand at some point. we have a situation here where you've got one person who saved the life of a woman, and i think that's terrific. how much of that do you have in the united states, not much. and the question of terrorism versus arms, i think this is going to be a terrorist issue, but i don't understand in the meantime until all the facts are in, we don't declare them both. >> i would think it depends on who's the lead on the case. >> who's going to take over and have jurisdiction over it how it's going to be bruted and what rules of evidence are going to apply. so the categorizization does

matter. >> this is how wart ray, he survived the shooting at ft. hood and he says what happened in oklahoma is terror. >> i think the more and more that you look into the suspect's facebook page and his ideology, i think you can really finding the underpinning of why this happened. you know, an an by co-worker doesn't just, you know, people typically run into that situation, you'll see a shooting or something like that, but you won't necessarily see someone get their head served from their body. >> yeah, i mean you look so far, this is an ongoing investigation, there there's a lot of information coming out. but already by friday night, we had a lot of info about this guy, about the suspect, about hiss background, about his religious beliefs, about hid ideology and what he was intent upon doing. so i don't know why we have to discount his own words, the life he lived, in fact we have evidence from his computer, from his postings, from the people he

had contact with. if you're going to prosecute this, you go to the boards and say who has he been in contact with? this gang member, this gang member, who are his associates with? who does he choose to surround himself with, and did someone get to him to radicalize him, whether it was in prison or outside in the mosque, to persuade him as a target to commit jihad in america. >> in vietnam, where there was a mass movement against the vietnam war, it broke off because it wasn't radical enough. the weather men went under ground, another of different factations under ground went on to bomb people and kill people, as we have heard, some have been arrested. but the large percentage of them were not that way. in this case, i think the key will be, can you connect this guy up to an order from isis to do what he did? even if he didn't get in a word from isis, the propaganda is out there and he took the idea from

isis, does that make him a terrorist? it probably does, i guess. >> you're right, yeah. >> i just don't know the answer to that. >> he's outlined that he did it in antipathy to al qaeda. >> but not by order of them. >> it doesn't matter, you don't have to be ordered by an extremist group to carry out a jihad. >> you can come up with the idea on your own. >> and you can be a terrorist. you too can be a terrorist. and that's what scares the heck out of the obama administration, is all these homegrown terrorist incidentses, things happening in new jersey or many minneapolis high school kids. here's the problem, the department of justice said we're going to have a new push to not profile. now i'm not sure if this is just hofr ri horrible timing on their part, but if there was ever a time to start profiling, it would be against this guy who said i want to convert to islam, in sympathy to al qaeda. that would be a great profile to

start looking at it. literally the timing is unbelievable. now we're going to somewhere a push against profiling. >> dana, there was another weird case a fired nursing home employee was fired on friday for threatening to behead a co-worker. this was a couple of weeks ago, this was tweactual before this then they came and picked him up. do you think this was a copy cat thing and if it is, how do you deal with that? do we just call it a spree killer and then just not talk about it. >> we have to have information coming into the police and investigators in lots of different ways. i'm not necessarily thinking that an employer needs to be on their employees facebook page looking for jihadist messages, but there are indications that they knew he was of that kind of i'd idealogy. i'm saying that because i'm comfortable with this, but we just had a big debate in this country over the last three years about intel and targeting

people and picking out key words and he has his fourth amendment rights. so are we saying that somebody like that shouldn't -- you can post whatever you want on the internet. at what point does it cross a line? and that's something still that we still just sort of brush by that issue and i think we're asking intel and law enforcement to do a lot to protect us with one hand or sometimes two hands tied behind their back. i don't know what the answer to that is, i don't think you want your employer constantly monitoring your social media. >> if you're putting it out there, you're losesing your right -- if you see a guy like this who's telling us exactly who he is and what he intends, let me take you at your worth. then you bring in somebody like the nsa, they can go through and say who did this guy talk to, and go through like this to find the tentacles of terror, who he was with, who he last talked to. >> assuming he does have te

tentacles attached to terror. coming up, obama finally admits, the presence the u.s. underestimated the isis threat. but who's at fault? you'll hear about that next.

when folks think about what they get from alaska, they think salmon and energy. but the energy bp produces up here creates something else as well: jobs all over america. engineering and innovation jobs. advanced safety systems & technology. shipping and manufacturing. across the united states, bp supports more than a quarter million jobs. when we set up operation in one part of the country, people in other parts go to work. that's not a coincidence. it's one more part of our commitment to america.

>> thank you, greg, last night on 60 minutes, president obama admitted the u.s. underestimated isis. but don't blame him for calling it a jv team, blame u.s. intelligence. >> jim clamor has acknowledged that they undermaes it what was taking place in syria. >> but the president had gotten daily briefings about the isis

threat >> the strength of the insurgency in syria is now estimated at somewhere between 75,000 or 80,000 or up to 110,000 to 115,000. >> there are some groups that are in particular concern from an extremist standpoint. the al qaeda e within syria and the islamic state of iraq, isil. it's those latter two that i think are most -- >> the syria conflict over the last two years provide a platform for isis to gain safe havens. >> as early as nine months ago, you had that kind of testimony. three months ago you had the white house asking congress to withdraw the authorization to use military force. a month ago president obama called isis a jv team and now we have actually gone back to war, but he says the consequences of

his decisions are not his own, but a consequence of the intelligence community. how long do you think the intelligence community will put up where w that? >> you have to understand how they use words, he's not really blaming anyone, it's kinetic responsibility shifting. the buck never stops with him. it stops with anyone but him. u.s. intelligence must love him. and i love how, when stuff is good, he always says i, but when stuff is bad, it's always we or the u.s. or they. but it's amazing, he's kind of like a sulky teenager, but it's not his fault, because the media acts as his enabling parents, they're to the ones that agree with him, so he can get away with it. he says, ah, it's not my fall, they go, you're right. >> the intelligence community in president obama's mind, he's saying they got it wrong. let's say the intelligence community in obama's words

gotten it right, would the result have been any different leading up to the beheadings of the two americans? >> no. let's put it this way, i think it would probably be the same strategy that he employs now. he just waited as you point out, since february he at least had the intel. but he waited until now. by the way, i'm in favor of what president obama is doing with the strategy, the air strikes, and training some coalition members, i'm all for that, i think he's doing it well. can i just point something out on this whole 60 minutes interview last night? >> sure. >> there were three things that were wrong with it. number one, he passed the buck, he blamed everyone but ims for what was going wrong, not only with isis, but with the economy. president obama literally sat there and said, i inherited it from george bush, a bad economy, and by the way, the unemployment rate was up at 10% when i took over. my head exploded. it was 7.8%, up from 6 -- he was

elected at 6.8%, he took over at 7.8%. eventually he got there, but the point he was trying to make was how bad it was when he took over and he used false data. and steve across just sat there and nodded his head the whole time. i was just shocked that they would let him gateway with that stuff, and it was a terrible interview for president obama, if you did a fact check on it. >> there was a real push after 9/11 for the presidents daily brief to be released. there was resistance from the white house, but eventually they were released. to get to the bottom of this issue of whether or not the warnings were there in the intelligence community, do you think that the white house should release those daily briefs, or at least let the bipartisan intelligence community take a look at them? >> i think they should because they're going to show that mr. clapper, who you all are so worried about being thrown under the bus did not know about the london bombings, did not know that he said russia and china

were our biggest threat in 2011, forget iran and north korea. he said that gadhafi was consolidating his -- that was in 2011. and in 2012, he said al qaeda has weaken to the point where it no longer poses a threat. this is a guy that is clearly off his game and he gave the president of the united states and you're blaming the president of the united states. this is a guy who was incompetent. >> you threw him under the mack truck. >> under the mack truck and more. >> so should president obama fire his director of national intelligence, given what you just said? >> hello? >> how about when he admitted to lying to the senate panel last year about benghazi? shouldn't that have -- shouldn't president obama have shown the leadership to fire him at that point or at least -- >> or at least when you said threw him under the bus, he should have been thrown under the bus a long time ago.

>> you heard it, fast and furious. >> it's not clapper's fault? how can you say it's not clapper's fault? the guy didn't know about the london bombings, he didn't know about gadhafi. >> you defend that idiot. go ahead. >> i'm not defending him. >> what i'm saying is this is his guy, it's his choice, if he doesn't think he's able and capable to do the job, he's incumbent upon him to remove him. what i'm telling you is if the president received daily briefings about national intelligence and community, but our own katherine harris reported it. but even as far back as march, we were getting intelligence from kurdish forces telling us that they were massing all the equipment, moving arms, preparing for an invasion of iraq. he did tell us, so he's not being quite honest. >> is there speculation whether clapper should be a part is a real one and should be

discussed. he did provide the president with -- excuse me, wait a minute, he took clap evperclapp reports and made decisions. >> but he didn't do it in a vacuum. >> what they're saying now is clap on, but clap off. >> i tell you what, i think what president obama did tell the nation last night is that intelligence can be wrong, apparently, and no bush necessarily lied about it. >> it sounds like the u.s. -- >> and the u.s. is ill equipped, that we don't have good intelligence, because if we did, we would have known about it. because the fact of the matter is we did know. >> we have the best intelligence on the planet. what about president obama who goes on 60 minutes and throws the whole group under the bus. they can't be happy about that. why don't you understand english. this is the facts. >> are you saying that the president's senior advisor on intel, that that is noz ht his

responsibility, that that is president obama's fault? >> if people in the intelligence community come to him and say clapper's wrong. >> i said clapper made the presidential analysis for him, nobody said clapper was wrong. this went on for four years, clapper. >> don't you understand, that can't be president obama's fault. it can't be. >> you're right. nothing ever is ever going to be president obama's fault. as soon as i learn about that, i can tease, because the president used one of president reagan's favorite lines, are you better off since he's been in office? os and fewer choices in retirement. know that proper allocation could help increase returns so you can enjoy that second home sooner. know the right financial planning can help you save for college and retirement.

know where you stand with pnc total insight. a new investing and banking experience with personalized guidance and online tools. visit a branch, call or go online today.

♪ want to change the world? create things that help people. design safer cars. faster computers. smarter grids and smarter phones. think up new ways to produce energy. ♪ be an engineer. solve problems the world needs solved.

what are you waiting for? changing the world is part of the job description. [ male announcer ] join the scientists and engineers of exxonmobil in inspiring america's future engineers. energy lives here. the midterm elections are just five weeks away and president obama can feel it.

his party is not going to lose control of the senate. >> do you think you can hold the senate? >> yes. i do. >> do you think you can sell this? >> you know what? -- >> you think you can convince people that they aring the fine economically? >> hopefully they get a chance to hear the argument. because all i'm doing is presenting the facts. >> president obama says he will hope in -- then he admitted some serious shortcomings. >> ronald reagan used to ask the question, are you better off than you were four years ago, in this case, are you better off than you were six? and the answer is, the country is definitely better off than we were when i came into office. and they don't feel, it, and the reasons they don't feel is it that incomes and the economy is going up. >> my purse is heavier with bus tokens than the average

american. >> the democrat also continue to hold the senate if they hear the facts and then he goes and spews inaccurate facts, that 10% number i just pointed out in the last spot. here are the facts, when he took over, gas was $1.83. now it's almost double that. he himself mentions incomes and wages and household net worths aren't going up as well. the only thing that's really going up is the stock market, and that's because he keeps pumping out dollars out of the fed, it's a shame what's going on. the top 1% are definitely getting richer. forbes 500 came out and it's the highest average net worth. wealthy people are getting better, but the middle class isn't getting any better. >> how do you see it? can he really sell this to the american people? >> the president is going to say that they can win the senate up until election day, because that's just what he's going to say. even if all of his advisors are

saying, sir, there's hardly a chance in the world that isles going to happen, even though there is a chance, actually there is a chance, the window is closing, i think the problem for him on the economy is that perception is reality. and the perception is for people feeling like they are working harder, but unable to get ahead. and that they see the wages of the 1% increasing and not their oesh and that their costs are going up and they just feel like there's not a lot of hope. and i think that is what is driving a lot of the feeling about the economy, something like 80% of people think that the economy is on the wrong track, whether the president is right when he presents the facts doesn't matter when you're dealing with a perception of people feeling like they cannot get ahead. >> and the perception of people as i travel around the country is that they're a lot better off than they were six years ago. i have gone from 52 to 51. i see one republican now, losing thatity didn't think was going to lose before.

and one democrat that -- i'll give it to you next week. i'll give you a list. >> will you share some things? >> i have much to say here. first, president obama's definition of better off is the opposite of traditional norms. to him having less money actually means you're spending less, which means less stuff, harming the planet. to him capitalism, to him -- you know this, bob, capitalism is a tumor that he shrinks because e he's always found it on the a pernicious effect on planet earth. if the economy grew, how can he be proud of that? we have 400,000 liberals in new york marching against con sumpbation, how can he be happy when consumption expands? that is harmful to the world. the bay the administration is right now, it's like a two-hour movie where the climate took

place in the first hour, and now the audience is silting there and they're fittinging and we all jufl want to go home. >> do you think he's paying attention to those 400,000? >> why has. he done anything on the pipeline? why has he done nothing with fracking? because he's beholden to the radical environmental movement. he easterified of them. >> can i agree whole heartedly with dana's point that president obama, he is so political, he deals in perception instead of fact. he says facts, but the reality is he's really playing arrange in perception, he can tell you that things are better, but the facts are, things rshlt better. >> they are better off, but they're better off because of the private sector. if use look since reagan, the things we have, electronic, if you look at things like apple. but he didn't build that. >> the president's saying he thinks it's because of him that

he thinks things are better than six years ago, but the economy is saying, people out there, i do think they think it's better, but it's in spite of. >> i have come a long way, i think i have learned a lot about it, i think it does add jobs, but i don't think it can take away from the president's actions to do that. >> the government is definitely bigger off, it's bigger, it's fatter, it's more sbrintrusive n ever. another fastest 7 coming your way, featuring joe biden and derek jeter.

welcome back time for -- the

fastest 7 on television. three fierce stories, 7 fleeting minutes. joe biden plays it loose sometimes saying funny stuffs and we all affectionately replay those times and had some laughs. here's joe condemning george bush for just considering what president obama is actually doing now. >> the five leading scholars, constitutional scholars, they drafted a treatise that's being distributed to every senator. and i want to make it clear, and i made it clear to the president, that if he gives a -- without congressional approval, i will make it my business to impeach him. >> uh-oh. >> expecting consistency from politics is like expecting a latin maps from a bunny. the leftists are quiet about war

who are crucifying bush and biden saying he wouldn't -- we can't write this off as joe being joe, he literally said if george bush thinks about going to war wither rang, i will move to impeach him. bush actually got congressional approval to do his war thing, but obama hasn't. >> i mentioned that in the b block about the legal underpinnings about the war in afghanistan was the authorization to use military force dealt with terror. the administration three ms ago, maybe two months ago asked the congress to withdraw that and said they didn't need it any longer. this apparently is why the intelligence community gets the entire middle east wrong, according to president obama. now what they say is yes, they still want that authorizization to use military force repealed, even though they still believe they don't need anymore because

they can take action in syria, now they're asking congress to consider a new one, but they want it so narrow, that they would basically hamstring the generals from doing what they need to do so this is fraught with legal peril and it will be an interesti ing debate when it comes time. >> let me put an intense grade language. >> so i can understand this? >> thanks, bob. can you explain this for me? >> that's what i was told to do. >> yeah. >> you know what, bob? >> so joe says, i would impeach president bush if he downtown get authorization. >> i think it's both the war powers act and the existing law, obama had every right to do what he did. bush did and could have done it without going to congress. >> you know, listen, it made me angry then, but now i like to listen to him talk in general. >> this weekend, "saturday night

live" kicked off their 40th season, and president obama got spoofed, it was pretty darn good, check it out. >> the rings are going to get brighter. >> plus if you had a better approval rating, you would have to be all over the country campaigning for other democrats. but they don't want you anywhere near them now. so why don't you just give the campaign tour and hit up the on the run tour. >> k.g., you're up. >> i love that man. it's very clever stuff, and he's a cast member too. a native from staten island whose father died. >> on 9/11, right? >> bob, did you catch that? >> i didn't see it, but it sounds funny. >> i think it's healthy, i think it's progress, i think the administration should look at that not, you know, in disappointment, but in that you know what? we're making progress, now they're making fun of us too. i actually think that is -- it's

a leap forward. >> no, it's not. >> any satire or criticism of president obama after the 2012 election is as brave as heckling at stone, it's like throwing an egg at the queen mary, it had absolutely no effect. if they had done this before and taken some real shots, that would have been brave, when it maded. but it doesn't matter now, obama would laugh at this because it has no affect on him. >> that's a good point. thank you for explaining that to me like a 10th grader. >> i tried, i tried. >> good point, where were they in october or november of 2012. all right, finally time for some feel good minutes. derek jeter finished a career in style, all five championship rings on and off the field. here's a minute to honor the manage who earned the name respect. >> the one-two. chop toward third. it's a big hit and an rbi for jeter and the yankees lead 3-0.

his final hit an rbi single as jeter says goodbye to baseball. >> you were saying what? go ahead. >> i don't know, you were mouthing something. but i think that -- i loved this, i thought it was an emotional moment. class act, he will be voted in on the first ballot. here's a guy who got through major league baseball with a clean record, scandal free, and you saw the respect that he had garnered throughout the industry by having, you had boston team players, even players in other sports came and honored him on the field which i thought wiz incredible. >> not many stick around with the same team. he stayed 20 years about the yankees. >> i like that loyalty. in fact at the airport, my flight was delayed by five ours, and i had a choice between a couple of different jackets and i chose the yankees, but apparently i didn't know much

about sports, but i knew about him. >> i'm just glad that all of my peeps helped out. he was a great student and i wish him well. >> i think he would make a good husband now that i think of it. loyalty, 20 years with the same team. >> are you throwing your hat in there? >> all right, we'll leave it right there. next, did any of you bing watch shows, house of cards, tyrant, walking dead, which are your five favorites? we'll tell you coming up.

i'm a deputy u.s. marshall and i'm here to arrest you on a federal war raptd. those boots are not mine so don't you even think about running. >> the best television series on tv, but "the wall street journal" has come up now with too many people are binge watching these things. i don't like television, i watch the news and the "sports illustrated" contest every year.

but was that picking it up enough? >> that's not on tv, that's a magazine. >> okay, in any event, are bingeing on tv too much? is it dangerous for us? do you binge on tv? greg, what do you binge on. >> let me explain what you're talking about. binge watching is when you watch a lot of episodes of a show at once. the great thing about it, it's an expression of how we have exploded choice. we are no longer beholden to the producers to watch the way we want to watch. we can watch anything whenever we want, it's no longer controlled by the provider. you can eat wherever you want, with ub ervegs r, you can get a car wherever you want.

the golden girls are amazing. i own a golden girls robe. >> here's why you need to get off the addiction of binge watching. i love it. i love to be able, as greg points out, if i want to watch eight episodes of house of cards. i'll watch eight episodes of house of cards. homeland. sometimes these plots get so convoluted you need to watch eight episodes at once. >> david, you're the ones that got me into binge watching. i watchedconditions s seasons in about a day. >> i do it only if the weather's bad.

because if it's nice outside. i feel guilty. but i like to space it out a little bit. i'm a little bit behind on all the episodes. >> do you binge watch the document tries on seals? >> is this a real segment? >> seriously, ill thought you liked -- >> those aren't my -- mine is "grey's anatomy." and anything that has jack bauer in it. i live and die like this, crawling, begging for more 24. >> i used to binge watch 24. when that first came out, we would reported it and watch it on the weekends. >> i watch the bachelor in real life. >> like jack bauer or the real person? >> i would date him after 24 hours. because for the first 24 hours, he's unavailable. okay, one more thing is up next.

if you don't think when you think aarp, you don't know "aarp." aarp's staying sharp keeps your brain healthy with online exercises by the top minds in brain science. find more real possibilities at aarp.org/possibilities.

>> everything just bear with me, because it's a monday. i did like this story. ole miss was playing memphis, and memphis was doing a return and then guy got body slammed and there was a big brawl and

the kicker was the only person who got kicked off. >> necessary roughness from ole miss. and a fight started to break out on the sideline. >> number 97 are the kicking team. by rule number 97, has been ejected. >> and here's the kicker. >> 97 is gary wonderlick the kicker. >> joshua and i really need to work on our timing. >> try to salvage this after that embarrassing display. >> i'm so sad, because george clooney is off the market. it's terrible. i think fx news needs him for -- >> i think this is an example of how you stay in your lane when it comes to one more thing. this is in your lane, this is a perfect one more thing for you. >> this is perfect for me, it

involves marriage, george clooney. they got married in venice, in a castle. >> it was amazing. >> my one more thing, i want to highlight a guy who i really don'tlike and i rarely see anything with, but watch what he did. >> if vast numbers of muslims across the world believe, and they do, that humans deserve to die for merely holding a different idea or drawing a cartoon or writing a book or eloping with a wrong person, not only does the muslim world have something in common with isis, it has too much in common with isis. it amazes me how here in america, we go nuts over the tiniest violations of these values, why gross atrocities are ignored around the world.

shouldn't we be starting with the mutilators and the honor killers? all right, it is time for, greg's secrets to happiness. all right, here we go. you know what makes you happy in life? take a look at this, the best thing in life is when you got a car, you got to make sure you got a sunroof, and when you got a sunroof, you got to make sure your teeth are in great shape. that dog has amazing teeth. let's move away and show more teeth. look at that, is that incredible? >> that's so cute. you got to make sure you have a dog, you couldn't do that in new jersey, it would be illegal. >> you need a go pro to do that. >> speaking of dogs, i actually borrowed a seat from jasper, i hate to say that word, but i got to ride in peter's side car at dana's beautiful house in south carolina. and here with are, riding along

and this is the wrong picture, taking pictures of me and two dogs, they're both being very nice and they're being forced to sit there with me. >> you're stroeb ee're stroking the end of the show. this is a fox news alert, i'm brett baier in washington. the man who jumped a fence at the white house and got into the executive mansion with a five, got a lot further inside than we have been led to believe. ed henry is live tonight with breaking news. >> reporter: that's right, the more revelations tonight that are going to further embarrass the secret service. a source close to the investigation tells me you saw the suspect ran over the gate and then ran through the front door, which was unlocked two fridays ago. he got inside much further. there is a lot of wrestling and struggling i'm told inside to tackle the suspect, omar gonzalez. look at this map from the white house website. he goes into the front doo