tv The Five FOX News October 31, 2014 1:00am-2:01am PDT
1:00 am
certain finger right back. but again that's just me. good night. hello, everyone. i'm greg gutfel. it's time for "the five." if the republicans win next week, what's the plan? the media is already there, warning them against extreme partisanship. don't act nuts, the hacks say. though it's the hacks who brand them as nuts. funny, they never did that in 2009 when the kids took over. so what's the plan? restoration. the president's rare combo of arrogance and incompetence has left us trashed and vulnerable. what was once cool years ago is now cold.
1:01 am
like fonzi at 70, leather has been replaced by life alert. it's time to address the real concern, security and strength. first thing, restore the military. that's the real safety net. restore the border. while you're at it, the white house too. as it stands, any crazy person can trespass both. energy independence. you want cheaper, cleaner fuel, more jobs and freedom from mad men? frack the hell out of the place. why not a special prosecutor for the irs? that would be nice. but there's one thing all americans need stat, and that's unity. life's been rough, thanks to a cult that thinks everything pre-obama was evil. they waged a war on all things that worked. no more. time to restore the value of achievement, put industry ahead of identity, patriotism not pigme pigment. we must return with a pow, not a vow. the gop vision must be a strength. it should not simply be right but persuasively so creating new
1:02 am
ways to say what's always mattered. it's the uniform of the happy warrior. let's dust it off. if we're lucky, it still might fit. what are you gig ligling about? >> your last line and if you were thinking about something else this morning. you said that you needed to slim down. >> oh, that's true. i'm having problems getting into my calvins. those are my jeans, ladies and gentlemen. kimberly, let's go around the table. >> i want to wear the happy warrior costume tomorrow morning. >> excellent. what should their plan be for plan a? >> so i've heard they have a war room set up. they need to be on point with a succinct, persuasive message that will come that this is the end of the world if the republicans get some sweeping wins like we anticipate they
1:03 am
will. right away we'll have people like bob beckel and his brethren saying this is fanatical, the tea party, it's the end of the united states as we know it. the war on women has just stepped up to a whole other level. those are going to be some of the things because then they'll do everything they can to frighten everyone into voting for a democratic president in 2016. >> i love how the media is already saying -- they're telling if you win, you still have to act like you lost. which means compromise, right, bob? >> oh, sorry. i'm reading my notes here. >> solitaire. >> first of all, listening to your open as usual, it was -- this is antidepressant pills will go on the increase. things are fine. i don't know why you're so freaked out about everything. the military is stronger than it's ever been. it's funded as well as it's ever been. having said that, i think what the republicans need to do is pick out some things that they can win on because they're going to have to win. that includes getting a
1:04 am
signature from obama. one, fix obamacare. if you open your mouths and say you're doing away with it, people will think you're as crazy as you are and send you to the nut house. fix it. it can be fixed and democrats will go along with it. if they don't do tax reform this time around, they're all nuts because they can both agree on that. they want to put some markers that will get vetoed but that's all right. but first start out with things that are doable. >> ick. so three parts. we're assuming that the republicans take the senate, so you have the house and the senate. now all you need the presidential signature. number one, energy independence. that means permitting drilling on all offshore and onshore federal lands. that's the first thing you can probably get at least to the president's desk. let him go ahead and try t to pl back on that one. >> yosemite national park? >> he probably will veto that one. i don't think he's going to veto the keystone pipeline.
1:05 am
he'll say look, we tried, it's over, folks. let's go forward with keystone and refineries. you get those permitting processes down, that will help. corporate tax reform, bob, i agree with tax reform. from the corporate side you can bring $2 trillion back to the united states with the repatriation. just say, you know what, let it come back. it doesn't cost america a single penny to do it. it's sitting in overseas bank accounts. bring it back. it's a $2 trillion stimulus package overnight. he'd be foolish to say no to that. and individual tax reform, i'd go back to bush aera tax rates. he'll never do it. >> bob even talked about that yesterday, to go back and try to get some working deal on tax reform. >> i think it's more than -- i think the re -- whatever that word is about bringing those things back -- >> let's get dana in. >> let's get dana in, fine. >> and thanks for leaving the hospital and coming here to
1:06 am
offer your insight. >> i'm an ebola nurse. >> for halloween. >> what was your suggestion if you were in the white house -- >> if i was in the white house? >> if i was mcconnell and boehner and planning for post-tuesday situation. i agree with everything that's been said and would add a couple of things. i would reextostore the defenses that took place during sequestration. i think everybody believes that was a bad idea. i would also ask the president to sign a new authorization to use military force. i think that would strengthen the president's hand and show that the republicans are willing to help him do what is right and necessary in order to degrade and destroy isis. the other thing that's important is oversight. that's a congressional role. it's not just the white house doing things, all across the federal government. the last two years of any administration is when they try
1:07 am
to put through all sorts of new rule making or to start the process of getting them so they jam the next administration. that's what the clintons did to the bushes, very successfully. the last thing is, and i don't know what it is, they have to do something on obamacare. that's what brought them to this point where they're going to be able to win. i don't know what they'll be able to do. if they want to pass something he'll have to veto and they go back to the drawing table, but there will be something on obamacare within the first 100 days. >> drawing board. there's no such thing as a drawing table. >> there is a drawing table itch you're an architect. drafting table. >> this is a political show, this isn't the brady bunch. >> kimberly, talking about obamacare -- >> i mentioned that yesterday. i agree with her on that. >> yes, you did. congratulations. the winning strategy isn't to fight symbolic battles. like you don't want to close -- like republicans -- let's close the department of education. is that silly? isn't it time to win actual
1:08 am
battles and not night symbolic ones? >> no, i think you're right. i think they need to show that they are the party of purpose and that they can actually set a goal and achieve it and not be something that just engages in inflammatory rhetoric but specifically set a target and acquire it. do something that's going to have a meaningful impact for the american people, that they can actually feel, because this is their opportunity between now and the presidential election to say you gave us this chance. your decision, your trust was well earned and now we're going to deliver on it. >> that, of course, requires that you have some sane voices, which you do in the republican party if they're freed up of tea party. now, one of the ways to do that, i almost wish the republicans would pick up 12 seats in the house, which is what the maurnlin would be to get them away from those fruit cakes and boehner could finally run his caucus and do the job that he wants to do which is to find common ground on some things. you leave those people with just the margin they have, and from the time they have been elected, they have been stifling every
1:09 am
serious piece of legislation or making it so impossible that it can't be passed by democrats. >> thank god harry reid doesn't do that. >> if you get rid of the chains of those people and let them go caucus in southampton or something, but get them out of here. they're a waste of time, they're bad for the country. they're bad for the country. >> you could say the exact same thing about harry reid and you'd be right. >> assuming it would go to the senate. >> and harry reid is far worse -- >> so you're saying, bob, you hope there's about 245 republican house members? >> whatever it takes to get the fruit cakes out of the business. >> that would be great because you can have your tea party caucus not part of the voting block that changes legislation. >> that's my point. >> i'm simply saying the more, the merrier. >> the more rs. >> what about the budget? >> they'll put forward a budget and congress should do something -- that's one of their
1:10 am
jobs is to produce a budget. that hasn't been happening. with mcconnell on the senate side i think you'll be able to get something done. i don't know if it's what paul ryan proposed before. some of this is irrelevant because hopefully they should do their jobs. but let me tell you something that's going to happen on wednesday morning. all the coverage immediately, everybody starts running to iowa and to the caucus states and all it is is 2016 and ready for hillary. we'll become tired of hillary very quickly. they're following her every single move. in some ways she kind of needs an opponent in the democratic primary because it's going to be so overdone so quickly. the people will start to tune her out and it will be two years out. >> she's got elizabeth warren sort of nibbling on her ear. >> there will be somebody running against her. >> if they do, if the republicans take the senate as well they don't come out and say here, we're going to do a whole bunch of stuff right away because honestly young people have started to make the move toward the gop, toward
1:11 am
republicans. if they come out and be really divisive right off the top, that's what they got sick of the last four years. >> it also depends on what president obama does. the first thing president obama has to do is nominate an attorney general. what's it going to be? does he want some sort of conciliatory candidate that he wants to have as his attorney general or does he want to jam the republicans and put them in a position of having to point out what a bad nominee he is. >> can i finally get you started out on this youth vote? in 2012, 56% of young people turned out to vote. in 2010, 24%. probably at about 23% this off-year election. when you're saying they're moving towards the gop, most are still against the -- wait a second. >> your number is wrong. >> it's not wrong. i got it out of the almanac. >> i was talking about a harvard study so that's different from what we're talking about now. however, the numbers are 18 to
1:12 am
29-year-olds, 12% voted in 2010. >> 12% of the eligible voters? >> let me just -- you know, where do you get these numbers from? you've got to be getting them from your libertarian library because they're just flat wrong. >> there's an 8% shift, right? congressional preference begins 2010? >> the point is that there's no movement from young people towards republican. >> there is movement. >> there is. >> let me show you. >> i know we've got to go. >> he's looking for it on his phone. >> there's a harvard study that shows -- >> among people who are going to vote. >> okay. >> we agree that's what i said. >> no, what i'm saying is if you take the youth population as a whole, they are not going to be -- they're not moving towards republicans. >> someone should be taking their happy pills. >> i'm happy. >> thank you for not moving. >> we're going to stay right here and talk for the next 45 minutes about the poll. no, next, while the obama
1:13 am
1:17 am
1:18 am
1:19 am
militant groups inside syria. here's more from national security correspondent jennifer griffin. >> reporter: some of the former detainees are fighting with isis, some are supporting the al qaeda-linked nusra front, some are on the ground in syria and some are supporting the isis propaganda campaign. there are 149 prisoners at guantanamo bay, 80 are cleared for release. u.s. defense officials estimate that of the 620 detainees released, 180 are suspected to have returned to the fight worldwide. could this be why the army isn't releasing the findings of the bowe bergdahl investigation until after the midterm elections. eric, you're shaking your head. do you think there's a connection? >> i do. what the heck else did they think they were going to do when we released the gitmo detainees. they fight, that's what they do. >> born and bred. >> you're not going to rehab them or spend ten years and all of a sudden they're going to realize jihad is a bad thing and
1:20 am
go be productive. by the way, being productive where they come from mean they're a better fighter, a better killer, so they go back to what they're going to do. no surprise, we've talked about it for years. so bergdahl, if they find these five -- you know, these five bad guys, if they find that they have become isis fighters, of course it's going to look bad because president obama and the state department made that deal. >> it couldn't possibly look good because then you have jihad recidivists which is always a bad headline. >> if you go back -- you're right about that. these 680 released by the obama administration or bush administration. what did we think they were going to be be boy scouts? in the bush administration a lot of going pack to be fighters. >> why don't we learn then, right? >> both administrations, ask them why they did it, because they didn't have any choices. >> but it's point the finger at someone else doesn't help us for the future and what we should be doing. >> part of this has to do with the agreement that you have with they go back
1:21 am
to. so if they came from tunisia and you say, okay, the government wants their prisoners back. they said they'll take care of them and keep an eye on them. then you try to trust that that government is going to do that. interestingly, because isis has now created allies that didn't exist before because now they have a common enemy in isis, they just might be more willing to take a serious look and detain the gitmo detainees if they were to get them back in their countries. but i have a feeling that the administration is not going to release any more for a while. i don't think this idea that the president floated of bringing the detainees here to america is going to fly. i also think that if congress were to pass another authorization to use military force, that it would strengthen the president's hand in order -- and the next president's hand to capture enemy combatants on the battlefield and hold them at gitmo. >> greg, can you beat that? >> yes, i think i can. no, the difference between president obama and president bush is that president obama has
1:22 am
been adamant in his promise to close gitmo. this is a microcosm of progressivism. you want to replace something that you have without actually having a coherent alternative. you hate capitalism, you have no alternative. you hate defense, you have no alternative. you hate the war on terror, you have no alternative. so basically what you have is a catch and release game with maniacs. it's okay to let them go but you've got to kill them when they get out of there because they're going to come back. >> you can't do that. >> no, you track them. you track them. the bergdahl five, they're not on tour with maroon five, they're somewhere. we should know where they are. >> can we be sure to get this on the record. you say obama hates capitalism. he hates the war on terror. >> all right. >> wait, wait, wait, i want clarification here. >> i let him go. >> i've got one more topic that's actually very good. >> go ahead. i wanted to make sure i got that
1:23 am
clear. >> the controversy involving the chicken [ bleep ] slur of israel's prime minister by an official who remains anonymous. now, will the administration reveal who said it. >> can you say whether the white house is going to attempt to find out who said it and punish that person? >> i don't know of any effort like that that's under way right now. >> is the administration trying to figure out who made these inappropriate and counterproductive comments? >> no. >> nope. fox's ed henry, he pushed even further. >> you've gone after reporters again and again in this administration to find out who leaked information to them. then when it comes to insulting the prime minister, you don't seem to care who leaked it. >> again, i don't think that is an accurate reflection of the administration's policy and certainly isn't an accurate reflection of our views of the prime minister of israel. >> they have put in place
1:24 am
measures under the leadership of the attorney general to ensure that journalists in this country are able to do their jobs. >> that's not true. all right. so, eric, the double standard here? what's going on? >> first of all, i don't know why they leaked it. and none of that stuff goes out unless they purposefully leak it. i'm trying to figure out if there's a motive for that. for the life of me, maybe dana can figure this out. but i always find it interesting when these things happen and there's a big kerfuffle, they don't know, they didn't hear about it, they don't know who leaked it. we were surprised by that. the irs, not a smidgeon of corruption. whoops, we shouldn't have implicated james rosen in the indictment. it's like -- >> it's so -- >> no one knows what's going on up there. is it organized chaos on purpose? >> you know what it is? it feels like a crash test dummy behind the wheel. like whoa, shouldn't somebody that actually is a human being with intelligence and understanding and information and honesty be behind the wheel? instead we get this, we don't
1:25 am
know how that happened. dana. >> i feel like foreign policy, the tone of it is set from the top. i find it very hard to believe that there are national security officials speaking to reporters in a leaking fashion. jeffrey goldberg, the author of that article, talked to one person and he called a different person who used the very same language of the chicken bleep. so they heard it somewhere. this is tacit permission to go out and talk that way. it's not just the insults, the personal insult, it's the foreign policy tone and it does have larger implications. remember also -- remember that anonymous tweeter that was on the national security council that was tweeting things that valerie jarrett thought was disrespectful to her? they did an investigation, they tracked him down and he got fired. >> they're not doing it here. >> the thing is, in a way i feel bad for josh earnest, i don't think he knew about it. but i think the foreign policy desk certainly did and this is with permission from the very top. >> for what reason? >> well, perhaps to provoke
1:26 am
them. it depends on -- you know, "the wall street journal" front page story was about the new detante we've entered. >> as soon as they investigate republican elected officials who use far worse words than we're used to hearing. >> baloney. >> i had one who said that obama was an f'ing socialist. that was on background from a republican member of congress. >> you say that on the show about people. the white house talking about our greatest ally in israel. >> calling the president of the united states a socialist, is that a good idea? >> the problem here isn't the language, it's that the white house expresses more antipathy towards allies than enemies. anybody who knows netanyahu
1:27 am
should just call him sir. the guy is an israeli commando. i don't think there's anybody in the white house that has any right to call him chicken blank. >> so disrespectful. >> chicken blank is so disrespectful. >> you don't think that's disrespectful -- >> i think it describes him. >> that's what you said. >> the controversy over a young woman's decision to end her life after a devastating diagnosis. the latest developments on brittany
1:31 am
this next story is a heart-breaking one and a controversial one as well. brittany maynard, a 29-year-old with brain cancer planned to end her life on saturday under oregon's death with dignity law after being told he had months to live. but those plans have changed. she decided to delay it after much public debate, and she explains why. >> when people criticize me for not -- for not like waiting longer or, you know, whatever they decided is best for me, it hurts because really i risk it. i risk it every day, every day that i wake up. and i do it because i still feel good enough and i still have enough joy and i still laugh and smile with my family and friends
1:32 am
enough that it doesn't seem like the right time right now, but it will come because i feel myself getting sicker. it's happening each week. >> so it's extremely sad. very also interesting as a public policy debate. kimberly, personally, it's not a choice i would want to make but i don't know if i have a right to tell anybody else what they should do. she got the front cover of "people" magazine two weeks ago talking about this decision and saying that everybody should give her her space to do that. i'm glad that she's feeling well enough to make a change. what do you think about this? you have had loved ones go through some illnesses. just curious how you would have dealt with that. >> i've seen not only in my own family, but unfortunately a large number of people dealing with terminal illnesses and how it affects the family members and how it affects the person, most especially in terms of how they feel about leaving those behind them. there's always this very tough
1:33 am
pull between wanting to try and survive and hang in there a day longer to be with them but also not wanting to be a burden and also physically bearing the incredible pain of a terminal illness. it's very difficult and i feel for any family that goes through it. this is her decision, this is her choice. i would never even put myself in her position to pass judgment as to what she should do. i think she's expressing a feeling that she believes in obviously the sanctity of life while at the same time understanding that she has a terminal diagnosis. the only thing they say to you with terminal diagnosis is palliative care. >> this issue was a huge public policy issue for a long time but now it's making its way back. oregon -- they moved to oregon in order to be able to do this legally under the law. >> i have two people that i knew, both of whom had
1:34 am
inoperable liver disease from drinking. one decided to take their life and said so. and in fact she did. the other one got near the end, decided not to do it, kept going and suffered a terrible death. but i think in a situation like this, i think people have every right in the world whether they want to go to their maker or not. >> okay. eric, any thoughts? we have about a minute. >> as kimberly, i lost a mother, a father and sister to cancer. i watched that struggle. if anyone had ever said along the road that they wanted to have an assisted suicide, i would have been on board. these people did as you point out move from california to oregon where it's legal. i like the fact that the states, when they make their decision -- by the way, anyone can't just commit suicide. there has to be certain things that fall into place so i'm for her having the right to do this if she wants. >> okay. do you have a last thought? >> well, yeah. i mean this is an unusual case. the bigger issue is when people are old and they're frail and
1:35 am
ill. they already possess the sinking feeling that they are a burden and you must fight to not contribute to that idea that they are a burden. but if a person wishes to die peacefully, not in agony, who are you to stand in their way. suicide is a crime. i've never understood. how is that a deterrent, you can't put me in jail after i've jumped off a cliff so i've never understood why it's a crime. >> interesting. as always, you leave us request some thought-provoking for the commercial break. did michael jordan have harsh words for president obama? you'll hear next.
1:38 am
introducing a new day of the week... someday... now, everything you were going to do someday, is on the calendar. want to retire someday? you'll really want this. a my social security account at socialsecurity.gov. you can estimate your future benefits, and manage current benefits online. millions of people have a m y social security account.
1:39 am
get yours today. because someday is here at socialsecurity.gov. welcome back. time for the fastest seven minutes on television. three saucy stories, seven speedy minutes, one sporty host. first up, we all know the president spends time on the golf course, a lot of time on the golf course. with over 200 rounds under his presidential belt, one would think he must be getting pretty good at golf, right? well, not according to michael jordan, who really is a good golfer. >> good at everything. >> i never played with obama but i would. no, that's okay, i'd take him out. he's a hack. >> you really want to say that, president of the united states? >> don't worry about it. i didn't say he wasn't a good politician, he's just a [ bleep ] golfer.
1:40 am
>> yeah, that was kind of funny. i like michael jordan. i like to play hoops with him fo sure. >> jordan was -- thought about turning pro for a while in the golf world so i'm not at all surprised he'd think he'd whip obama. >> were you surprised obama 200 rounds of golf isn't that good of a golfer yet? >> it's a tough game. i'm worse than when i started. >> what, his golf is interfering with his golf game? >> there's a shot. >> it wasn't a mean spirited shot. >> the person who would have laughed the most is president obama. >> and asked him to join the foursome. >> it's nice when you're a president and somebody treats you like one of the guys. >> maybe that's what he's doing. angling for the golf invite. >> the irony is that president obama is over par as a golfer but under par as a leader and in both cases he lacks drive. >> golf is an activity that
1:41 am
makes it difficulty your flaw. in reality a bad golfer means that you're doing other things. i will never be a great golfer because i'm awesome at sleeping. >> very good. next up, taylor swift gave a free concert in new york this morning during which she unveiled her new song "welcome to new york." ♪ welcome to new york ♪ welcome to new york ♪ welcome to new york ♪ welcome to new york ♪ it's been waiting for you ♪ welcome to new york >> and here's a little more tata and some annoying new york city tourism ads that have some homegrown new yorkers upset. >> first word, bodega. a bodega is a corner store that's open pretty much 24 hours most of the time. you can get almost anything in a bodega. bodegas are our friends. houston street, most commonly
1:42 am
confused with the street houston street. when you get here and you see the sign you think, oh, houston, texas, houston street. incorrect. houston street. >> before you go there, just understand taylor swift donated all the proceeds from her new song to the new york city public school system. dana, your thoughts. >> look, she's an american gem. she's a self-made person. >> an amazingly talented person. she comes to new york, she loves it and she donates all these proceeds to the new york city schools and does a free concert. she's a winner. absolute international star. new york should be so glad. new york should be so glad they're talking about taylor swift and not de blasio. she's the best ambassador new york could imagine. >> and she can pay a lot of taxes and help us out. >> with her $20 million apartment that she dropped. >> all the criticism -- when we talk about criticism, you have to understand it's driven by envious bloggers and critics on websites like gawker. because she is self made --
1:43 am
she's a self-made millionaire at the age of 25. the people that are going after her do not -- have no idea what bow coup harem is. >> shake it off, bob. shake it off. >> she said this stuff about new york for people who are new to new york. >> her fans know her -- >> and i think the change in her music style, i don't know what it was before. look at me, what's the downside of this being in new york? >> for the record, porter really wanted to do this segment. >> oh, yeah, taylor swift fan. ta-ta. >> whack job woody harrelson. 9/11 truther, self-described anarchist. this time the actor and activist is playing environmentalist in a new ad for next gen climate pac.
1:44 am
>> they told us the world was flat and insisted it was the center of the universe. they ignored pollution, said that cigarettes were harmless. that gas was safe and there was nothing wrong with cfcs. now they tell us that climate change is bogus. some powerful people want to hold us back, but the truth is undeniable, this is a fight we will win. >> so do you want to take this, greg, you know woody, right? >> oh, yeah, we go way back. the examples that he gave out as bad science, these are incorrect scientific theories. they were not propagated by skeptics, it was the science back then that believed in this idiocy the same way that mainstream science is creating hysteria over climate change. you noticed in that commercial or ad there was no talk about actual facts. there was nothing -- it was an emotional plea that dismissed
1:45 am
skeptics because they're so scared of the debate. they're so petrified of facing somebody like me. >> bob, your thoughts on this? >> he mentioned cigarettes about that. i think it's a terrific ad. i agree with everything he said on it and i think it's a fairly good reflection of politicians who don't believe in global warming. >> what were the facts there? i missed a few. >> the whole thing where a glacier was melting in the water. >> nothing about the sea level or the temperature pause, nothing about the droughts. >> this is what happens when you smoke too much pot. he was a visitor at the san francisco d.a.'s office. we had a district attorney that wouldn't prosecute marijuana cases. he was hanging out and gave him a tour of the pot clubs. >> i do think it's a ridiculous ad but i would take it seriously. we've got a big election coming up in 2016.
1:46 am
just a month ago they got 40,000 people to show up based on emotion here in new york city. this is a motivating force. >> so all of our concern about global warming is emotional, huh? >> it's irrational. >> more emotional than fact. hell hath no fury like a quarantined nurse. we'll tell you how kaci hickox spent her day in maine and it wasn't home confinement.
1:48 am
1:49 am
1:50 am
yesterday nurse kaci hickox, who treated ebola patients in africa, vowed to violate her quarantine in maine if it wasn't lifted. today she kept her promise. she went out on an hour-long bike ride with her boyfriend and even shook hands with reporters. one person not surprised she's breaking the rules, bill o'reilly, who's not surprised about anything. >> there's no mandatory quarantine. 33-year-old nurse kaci hickox is defying a state of maine quarantine because she can. miss hickox should be taken into custody, but she will not be because the feds have no ebola
1:51 am
policy at all. >> with all due respect to this woman who did some wonderful work in africa, don't you think it's a little 15 minutes of fame? >> she's really getting annoying now. >> she is. >> and now she's like riding a bike. why do you wear a helmet? you wear a helmet in case you fall, right? >> you cannot do that, come on. that's disrespectful to all of us. you cannot play solitaire while you're doing that. that's your block. >> how ironic, though. how ironic that we're talking about a quarantine and he's playing solitaire. >> you know what, she is obviously a great woman. but she should be quarantined for being obnoxious. right now she's trolling a country. she should understand that public concern is as important as a virus and people are upset and just a couple of doctors have said that she's hurting the image of the profession. and she should think about that. and to your point, she has con
1:52 am
great work and will continue to do great work but maybe she should assume we're all a little panicky. >> she's certainly diluting it with her very immature selfish behavior. as much as she's to be commended for her acts and serving, you know, overseas to try and eradicate ebola, great, but now you can't show the same respect for the people in your neighborhood and your community to enjoy a little staycation for a few more days and make sure that you're healthy and your loved ones and those around you? come on. >> that's a good argument, dana. how do you think she deals -- what's her argument? >> i think we have to remember that we're in the age of social media, so she -- i'm pretty sure she doesn't watch fox news. she's on her phone all the time or on her computer and she's got a circle of friends who are egging her on and saying this is great. this is exactly what you can do. you need to show those idiots that you can't get ebola from such and such. so i think she's being fed ---er ego is being fed.
1:53 am
i'm not saying that in a bad way because i absolutely respect what she did and i wish more people would be willing to go over and work in africa or wherever they might want to go. senator paul went to nicaragua earlier this year. is that the wrong country? >> no, no. >> guatemala. >> there's a lot of ways to give back but there is some sort of personal responsibility to your profession. >> very selfish. >> it was poker, it wasn't solitaire.e.e.e.e.e.
1:55 am
time now for something we like to call one more thing. dana, why don't you kick it off. >> i will kick it off with a little note that you could read an article that i just wrote about this unicorn cup. no, i'm just kidding. i wrote a book about the college republican, the rnc, all the efforts -- what did you just say to me? i wrote an e-mail? what are you talking about? okay, this is a column on fox
1:56 am
news.com. why is this going so badly. is that danny downers and how they should turn that frown upside down. >> great article that you wrote, people should read it, check it out. >> it's a great article. eric. >> so congratulations, san francisco giants last night became the first team in 35 years to win a game seven in the away park at kansas city, becoming the world champions. by the way, here is madison bumgarner getting his mvp gift. watch. >> we have also been proud of the latest and greatest technology in our trunk lineup which is the all new 2015 chevy colorado. it combines class leading technology with wi-fi powered by onstar. >> the thing about that truck right there, it was recalled october 3rd. they actually pulled it off the line today. they gave him a recalled truck. >> oh, no. >> he'll get another one. go giants, i love you so much.
1:57 am
i've got my earrings on today. aren't they cute? >> bob. >> tom menino is the longest serving mayor of boston, died at 71. he served five terms, he was a great guy and a great liberal. we'll miss you, tommy. i just want to give a little shoutout and a speedy recovery to our friends in the fox family. scoto, a new york icon, a great family as well. she was doing her job and ice skating when she got a very serious injury to her wrist and to her elbow but she's out of surgery and she is recovering at home. big kiss from "the five." and now it's time for greg's secrets to happiness, copyrighted 2014. you know what the secret to happiness is? teaching your dog to fetch a beer.
1:58 am
2:00 am
>> it is friday october 341st. a fox news lart. one of america's most wanted men captured after seven weeks on the run. where accused cop killer eric frein was found. >> democrats dipping in the polls. here's an excuse we haven't heard before. >> not always the friendliest face for african americansment the president should present itself in a positive way as a leader. >> a struggling reelection campaign. >> capitol liesing on crisis. the hole kealloween costumes ca the most
176 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
