minute of thisire show. this is mike huckabee befrom new york saying good night and good bless. and stay tuned judge jeanine yts.ta pirrghi thank you for being withl7te us tonight. you know, i believe in truth and po/ this pastj delivered much-deserved justice to president barack obama, his policies and his party. you put truth tor2 power to chae the direction that barack obama and yourkqáçx determination to back america was historic. majority in more than 80 years.

a republican-controlled senate. replacing democratic governors in blue states. republican control of more state legislatures than at any point since the 1920s. president barack obama's effort úy a socialist-style government under the guise of being simply progressive was overwhelmingly rejected by you, the u?thu and the assent of power of those in the business community, those in the xdñmilitary, and philanthropists was a sharp contrast to the community we have become accustomed to over the past six years. you rejected the make believe war on women that this administration tried to sell.y&r reducing our reproductive

should republicans be elected. defeating the strategy, that if you repeat is often enough, people believe it to be true. theépñç voters not low 3ñinform but instead briefed and savvy on the shar raids, the shell games and the lies. and the president's reaction to all this? >> to everyone who voted, i want you to know that i hear you. to the two-thirds of voters who chose not to participate in the process yesterday. i hear you too. >> you hear them too? what did they tell you? and when asked whether he felt any responsibility to+z recalibrate his agenda, the president didn't answer the question, but instead started criticizing how washington mr. president, one of theogv reasons washington doesn't work well is because as a leader, if you want to call yourself that, you have created more division,

more anger and more hostility than most of us can remember in recent history. you didn't come clean about benghazi, health care, fast and furious. you skirted scandals in the nsa, the irs, you su yo high-level officials. and your incompetent handling of ebola in this6ro country put o nurses at risk. and now you dig your heels in even deeper? after laying the"7béw groundwor order more thanli)ñ 34 million permits and green cards, you throw down the gauntlet;ú saying -- >> congress will pass some bills i cannot sign. i'm dds(retty sure i'll take so actions that some in congress will not like. so before the end of the year, we'reacá=%9 lawful actions thae 8q i can ta that i believe will improve the functioning of our#o&! immigrat system.3

>> and the only alternative coordina according to you, would be for p' sign. with all due rmt, you're a bully. do itp"?z my way oá executive order to do it my way. nowhere did you? you would compromise with a historically large republican congress just voted in by the american people. i'm going to give you some bad news. you and harry reid won't be able to block bills so the democrats don't haveh÷v8u to take a stand tough issues. and honestly, dirty harry reid, the one who wanted:=nw to move cattle for the tortoises, he should apologize to those cattle and cut theq8dbull. and mr. president, you're so delusional that you act like your party won. it didn't. republicans won.

remove the label of the party of no and for the next two0z(y yea put forth an agenda. bill by bill, that makes clear what they believe in. a stronger military. a secure border. the keystone pipeline. the repeal of the individual mandate in %zçobamacare. the ability to really keep your health cïw" your doctor.ú they must use the power of the purse that they now hold to counter your illegal executive actions.ío6r republicans need to do something to convince americans that they are not just the party of the rich./cgñ they must build support among latino voters by doing something for the immigrants in this country. but there's still two more years of president obama. and in those two years, this president will do everything he can to close gitmo, and that

reports are that if he can get gitmo down to 100 inmates, it's now at 148, he can bring them to a prison in the united ixx%s, one earmarked in his home state of úqpñillinois. ask in that vein, just this week, originally deemed too dangerous to release, a man who fought alongside al qaeda with the taliban was transferred ocu of gitmo and sent back to coup wait after the president's review panel said he was no longer a threat. that review panel, composed of many guantanamo detainee defense çany guantanamo detainee defense actually return to the battle field. replenishing the enemy in the time of war if not justice. mr. president, americans see through you. truth and justice is what they want. th

they want to take back bameric. and make no mistake. they hy[dçust begun. and that's my open. tell me what you think on my facebook page or> thanks for having me. >> this administration rehe'ses will a gitmo detainee. he's wanting to close it, promised it six yearsl#v+ñ ago. is he willingnt to do that no matter the consequences? and what do you know about this prison that's been earmarked in thompson, illinois? >> the president wants to do this.mry$gátrj said that from t begin. what you see now is a president free of the constraints of having to face the electorate once again. he's able to act more freely. there's a much higher likelihood to go forward.

if it were easy, he would have done it. he was goingd2/ to do it. he was goingd2/ to do it. and the facili,½t in illinois,,k this is what people have been worried about. transferring the detainees to the u.s. there are security risks. it's not necessarily that a jailbreak will happen, but attack the facility or around it ma. and then also on top of that, it could trigger a whole bunch of extra civilian#nfwv protections. which is another concern people have about bringing them here. >> you mean in protection in6qse courts and habeas corpus and getting them released from prison. my concern is if they are now going to be covered by the civilian criminal court laws, then americans are in more jeopardy, at least in cuba and gitmo, it's not a place where we have to worry about them necessarily coming -- or, you know, bein*@á dropped(9n off local bus stop in chicago. >> and there's also going to be a group there that the onlyto(2 derogatory information on them and from classified sources.

this has been known from the begin. they're not going to make that public, won't take that what would you charge them with into civilian court? this is one of the problems from the beginning of this. the obama administration seems almost obsessed. the supreme cou(sj taking up a case for somebody facing 208z years in federal prison for dumping three fish over the side of his boat. a u.s. citizen. they are obsessed with the gitmo detainees who have been there for a while, but not as long as the person throwing fish over the boat. s it idea lolg. >> what concerns about this guy who was just released is apparently syria, someone from thegd khorasan group in syria tweeted a congrats on the release before the release. and if the khorasan group is congratulating him, we know he was aligned with al qaeda, with the taliban. uu$ose five guys k;n for ?bergdahl, and they were3ze

of the worst of the worst. i mean, is there not a concern for us? >> there are two1qñ big benefito the bad guys whenever somebody gets released from gitmo. and the khorasan group, this individual is going to be released. ç )fcé÷minimum, there's a propaganda value. it's a weakenings of the u.s.'s will. one of our brothers is released back. there's a possibility, so5umpñ would say a probability that individuals like this go back and fight. become front line fighters. that's happened. this isn't just theoretical. there's propagandaiq value to these guys in the fight. >> say we not only won in terms of his being released. ps advantage. he isqh syria, and, you know, given that we note recidivism rate is up to 30%, then, i mean, is there any way that congress can now step

this from happening? these 0phcyreleases from happen? >> it's hard for the congress to stop this. the commander in chief has broad powers here. for syria, you ever the largest jihadist terrorist army on the march in iraq and syria. and at this point in time, the administration is starting to let loose some of the more dangerous fighters, long time detainees. we should keep gitmo open. it's probably going to be open for business more than we think it will. >> maybe they know something we don't, buck. maybe they rehabilitated these guys and we don't know it. >> there hasn't been a good record. g like the west more, unfortunately. >> buck, always good to have you thanks for being here. and coming up, i askn6b"ñ fbi director james comey what he

meant about tracking jihadists d returning to the u.s. you're not going to believe this. and vote in the instapoll. what message did they send on election day? justice on 6hafox, and we'll re some of your answers later in

test. test. inuçio interview, since he was the director in 2013, james comey said this. >> ultimately an american citizen, unless theirvgp?ñ passs áehentitled to come back. someone who fought with an american passport wants to come back. we will track them carefully.;#÷ z to me. z to clarif. take a look. york, mr. director.*ç you recently talkedupñ about lo

wolv wolves, calling them lone rats, and unless their passport is revoked, they can come back and liverq>ñ here, but you would mor them. 3v treason. and i know it's very difficult to prove. number gápçtwo, seditious conspiracy, which is a little easier. and apparently we've charged some of the guys working with al qaeda with that. &háhp &hc% is there not legislation that we can get passed to do that. and timely, how many fbi agents$ does it takeip 24/7 -- you say there are 12 of them, although there could be more. and what burden is that creating for zhg÷you? ,too. i think i either+m!s garbles it the way it came xá"'sacross. that was a 60 minutes interview.

folks !téçmisunderstoodññ(aw wh. someone with a valid passp/q= can come back. we track them very carefully if they're coming back to the united states. if i have evidence that you have fouwvk with a foreign terroris lo up. we will track you until you get here and lock you up. there's a variety of much easiej statutes to use, material support to a terrorist organization is one. that's fairly easy. i was surprised people thought.% we meant this that we would nce of on whom we fighting with isil. no. put that one@ the -- so i guess i don't need to answer the rest of it. >> it's all e 9dgood. >> folks h2%cñmisunderstood. i said people think i'm an id t idiot? we're going to follow these no, if i have evidence to prosecute, and you have a valid you will be at the mcc before

the sun goes down. q%=9 that not think that jim comey@ta took up arms, isil on an fo states? think about that forñzótfwi as soon as they land, we're going to arrest them. why let them get on an aircraftc a civilian aircraft,ibjt unarm civilian aircraft going to the united states. hink we have to clarify

clearly when you're dealing with groups like isis, this is not al qaeda. they're not hiding in the caves. these are militants. al qaeda is militant, but they were hiding. the idea to let them get on an airplane ands'ámz#qáu them in washington or new york orap7c chicago. thatov misses the point. i have a tremendous amount ofól% respect -- >> i know jim --.[aoñ and i wor with him as well. krc2fz extremel. jay, +2b the administration haspís÷ s policy, we're going to bring ÷ s these guys back and=@48emq%g t? k set. what do you think should happen before they get on the plane to come back to the1 are you saying we should kill i gitmo? >> i want to information as i can. whether they have cooperative agreements with thepycxñ britis >énfrench, certainly the israelis as well. we have thee5r[ñ intelligence capability to stop these guys before they

aircraft if we have the articles with$gxzñ%ff isis. to me it's4im1 inconceivable we not doing that >> you're not answeringo"jñe my question is this, before they get on that plane, what should >> there's number citizenship should have been s6i9oped. i think if they'rek>ñ7 arms,bi'ñ isis. we should take them out -- >> you >> yeah. >> are you saying killsäa $lth? >> this is the problem.?:s8ñ judge, they try these criminal cases. this is war. ou have done the cr2pval ases, i have this isn't indict%6'b and try a hu if they are taking up arms, the enemy, they are theq%48'b÷qi they should be treated like the enemy and eliminate theuzçé thr. believes theyo.2j need to come and tried, then this administration is not going to take them outç field.

they're letting them out of&xl3 gitmo lefta and right. they're going çóback, some of them, it's like enemy in the time of war. going back to the battle field.÷ your take is given the intelligence they should bek else, or o [l >> yeah. i think that's why we have gitmo. i know the prr3] said in the opening,xúyo÷,niaz o close it immediately. but there's a reason we have gitmo. the idea that the president is gitmo and sending thesexq÷ guys out. we forget, one thing they have clearly, patience. and the idea they have been in take up theirwd we're that naive, and i think the administration,uh7l is,(6bdh (angerous for the national this, we haveá3vç got to be muc

more on our game. and the president -- look, this ! judge. this is against the president's narrative. that's why he's so hesitant tox engage as a i(mtñwr[s he's increasing some of it, but not enough. >> jay, always good to havew1k, on. thanks for being with us.> a

a historic win for the republican party this week. americans send a strong message to the obama the dems. but hasu- the message fallenço deaf ears and emboldenedçvp th president to do whatever he pleases in the final two years?s

former and fox news contributor,;5w"ñ s kucinich. does he refuse to recognize that the american people are overwhelmingly satisfied with him? >> no. i think that the president he gets the message. the question is,2&xv as we look forward, what impact will this new arrangementja in washington where the republicanñ to power in both the senate and the house, have on the white house? and i think you may be surprised. i think you're going to kiññfin particularly in areas of9x fung ofc military force, you'll probably see cooperation. i might disagree with that. butgi7ñ that's what i think you see. >> you say that the president  the message. but what i heard was, look, if you don't do what i want on immigrat 7

>> fxnywell, i want to bring u something that maybe no one else has mentioned before. the u.s. constitut i, section 8, very clearly states that the congress has the ability to be able to make the -- a uniform rule of -- of naturalization. >> right. >> if you look at the constitution, cov ress has explicit authority there to be able to make decisions on naturalization. >> we know that and he doesn't. >> now the president -- well, the president, i think, isyc;ñ(' that presidentcéi lincoln set m % emancipation proclamation.ua=n taking an interviewk immigration. now that's the tension that we're looking at here. >> there's no tension there, congressman. here's the bottom line, this president is you go my way or highway. do you think, let me ask you this, do you think that the president ordering 34 million

work permit forms and then saying if you don't do it my way, it's executive action, 4y, it's executive action, for this? we all feel bad for a lot of the people who are here, but should these people speak english? swear allegiance to the united states of america? i used to swear them in as a judge when i naturalized legitimate people. we are going to say ignore theç law and come onsçzx in. shouldn't he get concessions from the immigrants? >> there are millions of people who are here illegally. at the same time i think we have to:b@b?h)ecognize there's not g to be massaï deportations. &háhp &hc% citizen. >> why does there have to be a path to citizenship? >> for millions of people, they're contributing to the u.ss this is a -- look, we have an immigration system, you have to remember this, judge,&é7y which some cases was driven by labor conditions south of the borderá and by tra that were bad trade laws that

encouraged people to move north of the border. and so -- they worked for cheap wages under unbearablc conditions. >> and now we have a problem one employment. but that's not the u+point. what you're2.1v saying, and you're not looking at is the fact that there are people no other parts of the world who want to come here. but we're too busy having the southern border coming here illegally, some3(fpo committing crimes. the administration is lying to us. they're not even deporting the criminals. onlywtetñ low-level misdemeanord not deporting the people who are illegally here and committing crimes. >> judge, let me tell you controlling ther&,+ border, you're right. the border has to be controlled. it's common sense. we have to control the border. there's a -- that's a separate question from people who have been here for years and who have sms ! q >> that's the first question. look. gz?yä986 whenvobw ronald reaga amnesty to the illegals, that

was as a result of the act of congress. what he:blh did was make sure d the congress agreeing with him. now if this president is going you say, article i, is a, you know, says that anything regarding the immigration should be handled by congress, then irst close the borders? why is that a bad word? ÷ a lot ofjh people with issues, what is the problem? >> we have a@pnñ right to contr the borderers. in bringing up the discussion, we're looking at a test of power in washington. the president has power, just keep something in mind. for years and years, congress has let the2ivhur+e go forward and make a path with war in particular, without congress weighing in. >> that's not what we're talkinz ab#w change with respect to the power.cans coming to >> congressman kucinich, good to have you on. thanks for being with us

tonight. >> thanks. all right. and coming up, the latest danger ta ta china. if you're suffering from constipation or irregularity, powders may take days to work. for gentle overnight relief, try dulcolax laxative tablets. ducolax provides gentle overnight relief, unlike miralax that can take up to 3 days. dulcolax, for relief you can count on.

in all 8 million vehicles are being recalled. the vetoers have spoken and they're fed up with the way barack obama is running the country. but all the hot button issues of last tuesday will continue to shape the 2016 presidential election. terrorism, ebola, foreign policy.

and you can bet our enemies will take advantage of this president before a new and hopefully stronger president takes office in 2017. with me now, former u.s. ambassador to the united nations and fox news contributor jon bolton. good evening. what does this victory mean for the president's foreign policy? >> well, i think one of the important issues in this election as you just said, was the feeling on the part of many americans across the country that the president's not doing the job he should be doing to provide their security. whether it's against terrorism, the proliferation of nuclear weapons, border security or ebola. and it played -- these issues, i think, played very important roles in some key elections. tom cotton in arkansas, joni ernst in iowa, thom tillis in north carolina. but it was the feeling across and the country and reflective of the view that the president is a poor leader. the issues are going to continue

to mount. and as you said, this is going to be a significant issue in the 2016 election. contrary to the political wisdom of six or eight months ago. >> week we heard now the president and the supreme leader of iran, the aye ya to la, they're pen pals now. what amazes me, what do we have in common with iran to have the concessions? in the beginning of the year this administration had a ceiling at 500 centrifuges. and now we're between 4 and 6,000, raising the numbers, so that they can enrich their uranium. why? >> why? i don't get it either. i think the president badly misunderstands the nature of the regime in iran. it is extraordinarily anti-american. its philosophy is a philosophy

of religious fanaticism. and essentially it's a military government at this point. they're determined to get nuclear weapons. they have been after them for 30 years. and they sense in the president a weak leader who is desperate for a deal for his own ideological and political reasons. the only reason they haven't signed something that would be very advantageous to iran already is they see they can get more concessions out of him. as you point out, now sending his fourth letter to the supreme leader. that tells them there's more to get here had. >> and the amazing part, if the united states believes that we need to give concessions to iran so they fight with the sunni -- against the sunni extremists, there are shi'ites that are going to fight with them anyway. >> well, i think that the really common thread, though, is that they both hate the united states. >> right. and. >> in the middle east, it's very dwraez to find common ground in that respect. so the whole notion that the

president's proceeding on is wrong. and he's not paying enough attention to isis to begin with. the main threat is iran. so the president loses on both scores. he's not dealing with iran's nuclear weapons program and the continued support for terrorism and not with i.c.e. sisis. >> what about in iraq? there's talk of mission creep, another 1500 troops going there. are you concerned about that? >> well, i'm concerned that the president's putting americans in harm's way with no strategy whatsoever. the fact is i wouldn't do anything to buttress the government in baghdad today. it's effectively just a satellite of iran. to fight isis in iraq, we need the sunnis of the western part of the country that were part of our surge in 2006 and seven and eight. we need the kurds and bring in other arab states as well. strengthening the government of iraq is not the way to go.

there's no evidence that it would work with more effort into it. >> all right, stay with us for another minute moving on to another developing story. justice has talked about the dangers that face the united states power grid for month. now in addition to powerful solar flares of late, the strongest in decades that have the potential to wipe out the grid, now comes words the russians may have hacked in years ago and left a trojan horse in the critical infrastructure. tthe department of homeland security believers they planlted the programs, the user can take control using only a computer or a smart phone. with me is morgan wright. thank you for being with us, what is this virus and how destructive is it? >> the russians used to build nuclear weapon weapons. they still do. these are smart people.

it's malware, software designed to wreak havoc, and destruct things. we were focusing on china and the other issues in the world, the russians kept building things. where we're most vulnerable, as you pointed out, the critical infrastructure, water, utilities, communications. if you can disrupt those, then they go do something like in crimea and the ukraine, our attentions are focused on that, we have a cyber event here at home. >> all right. it's my understanding, morgan, that this was put there in 2011. >> yes. sfrmg >> is there any way that we can disarm this mall wear? >> look, it's to pervasive, this is the equivalent of where's waldo with software. because it was deployed in europe on telecommunications at nato, so we have the advantage

of understanding the command and control structure, how it's used. we're able to use that to find it in our systems. but the critical infrastructure, 85%, is owned by the private se sector. there are so many places, where do you start? we can start, do it, but, boy, this will go on and on for years before we can find it and remediate it. >> given the fact, and justice has fought and argued for many months that some of these local power companies need to, you know, make the grid stronger. and we can't get them to do that. have we shared this information with them? is this the kind of information that they know about? and can they do anything assuming they would want to? >> sure. dhs, and i will give them credit, they've done a lot more outreach on sharing information and intelligence to the extent they can. they have what they call the information sharing analysis center that share information between the critical

infrastructures. so when this was learned in europe, started taking the indicators, what it looked like and detect it, sharing it with the private sector. a lot of these folks don't have the resources and wherewithal to defend themselves. the big companies might do it, but the smaller guys, this malware starts over and we're back to where we started. >> i'm going to ambassador bolton now. ambassador, are we doing the same thing to russia? is this how the game is played? are we being naive here? >> i wish i could say we were. and, of course, this is all classified, or i hope it stays classified if we are. but by and large i think the united states remains behind both russia and china and other rogue states like north korea that are doing cyber warfare conception chully. we don't understand it like conventional warfare. we have a lot of catching up to do and educating as your guest

was say, both in the government and the private sector. >> and ambassador, if we had known about this since 2011 and it appears that this is just coming out now, wouldn't the government have been trying to eliminate this malware? >> well, i think we're definitely making a lot of progress in defense against cyber warfare. but here's -- this is a conceptual question. what is a couple of graduate students playing around? what substitutes espionage? what substitutes active clandestine activity? what constitutes an act of war in the sicyber world. is that an act of war now, or when they finally trigger it? we're not ready on those grounds, and we've got a long way to catch up. let me say, even if the government is working hard, the private sector is much more as a rule vulnerable. >> thank you so much for being

with us. >> thank you. and coming up, tuesday's veterans day. now some four-legged friends can make life after war a little easier for our heros. you're not going to want to miss our next segment. do not go away.

veterans' day is tuesday. and we remember the brave american men and women in the military who've risked everything to protect us. make no mistake, the transition from military to civilian life

is not easy. in fact, in this country on average, 22 veterans commit suicide every day. groups like guardians of rescue and paws of war make comie inine easier for vets. with me and robert, the founder and president of the guardians of rescue and veteran sarge steve. sergeant, first of all, thank you so much for your service. you were in iraq and afghanistan. two tours. >> yes, ma'am. >> and now that you're back home, is the transition difficult? >> yes, it is, ma'am. it was kind of hard coming out, being in that brotherhood and i always look for that what i'm out. and trying to adjust is actually -- it's really been difficult, the transition. trying to get back to being a normal life. >> and how long were you gone, sergeant? >> i was in the army for five years. but i was deployed to afghanistan for 12 months and iraq for 15 months.

>> wow. robert, to you. tell me about guardians of rescue and pause of war. what is that? >> guardians of rescue is the mother company, the organization. and paws of war is the program. >> what is the program? >> places service dogs with veterans suffering from ptsd. and traumatic brain injury. >> how did you two come together, sergeant? >> i suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder and had a traumatic brain injury. i was told about paws of war and the program and what they do about placing dogs with wounded veterans. and i know that it helped a lot of veterans out. so i met them and started working with paws of war and hoping to get me a service dog. >> and i understand that you have been working with rob. and a dog -- and how does this dog help you? >> i've been working with paws

of war and also with the dog while train. she's been helping me while i was training. she got my anxiety down a little bit. and also she made me feel secure being around people i didn't know while at the training. >> and coming back from these two tours, i mean, you feel anxiety, you feel -- you have certain feelings, and working with the dog, that alleviates some of those anxieties? >> when i got out, some of my freedom was taken away from me. i like to go to malls and crowded places, and i don't sleep well at night. when i get the dog that'll help me sleep better and go different places i was never able to attend. >> and there is one dog that he's worked with. >> he's working with a dog now that's slated to go to him at some point. that dog's name is cally. >> and you -- he is not -- he has not been given to -- >> no, he only meets her at

training only. >> okay. >> all right. he is aggressively trying to determine when we will make this happen. >> sergeants, i know you have been waiting a long time to take her home. is he ready? >> i think he is. >> all right. i think it's time that we meet cally who the sergeant has been working with. and right now we have some good news for you, sergeant. >> hi, cally. oh, my gosh. : cally is taking you home tonight. >> oh, my god, cally, oh, thank you. >> how would is she? >> under a year. >> under a year. he loves you too. are you excited ? >> yes, i am. you didn't know this was happening, did you? >> no, ma'am. i have a lot of emotions right now. >> you know what, everybody loves you, everybody thanks you for your service. you have done great things for us and this is the least we can

do for you. and from the bottom of our hearts, trust me, we will be grateful to you, and if this dog can make you feel comfortable, god bless you and god bless the dog. give me a hug. i'm so happy for you. and i want to see the dog. all right. you're going home with her tonight. cally, hi. can i say -- oh, she is beautiful. >> thank you. >> congratulations. >> thank you. >> you know what? we're very, very happy. robert, thank you. >> thank you. >> i want to point out, the organization that is actually supplied this -- supported us financially to get this -- >> and that's the say it again? >> the cal warriors is an organization that puts on an event every year to support veterans. and this year they raised money for us to help veterans with service dogs. so we were able to financially make that happen. >> you're very excited, aren't you? >> yes, i am.

>> so is she. >> get my first good night's sleep, obviously. >> we'll be right back. stay with us. sergeant, cally, you're gorgeous. gorgeous. you're a beau (announcer) when you lose your hearing you lose your connection to family and friends. we are not here to celebrate your advance age. we are to celebrate your advanced [static] wisdom-- (announcer) you miss out. [static] he's always teasing us, but we [static] love him. he gave me a bowl [static] of dog food and told me it was-- (announcer) you lose your place at oticon we understand. as a leader in advanced hearing devices for over 110 years we can help, with the invisible alta by oticon. it's custom made to fit deep inside your ear canal, so no one will notice it. but you will notice a big difference in how you hear. experience alta for yourself risk free. call this number or go online the invisible alta can transform your life. happy birthday uncle jerry! (announcer) and help you return to the person you want to be.

the person others know you are. alta hearing devices by oticon: reconnect with your family, your friends, yourself.

last week i talked about how president obama needs to stop the kumbaya politics and start protecting americans. your responses. zeus says, i love the term kumbaya politics, judge. if only obama could give isis a group hug and a flower, i'm sure they'd change their ways. and joe says he probably hasn't read the paper lately to learn what's really going on. and april says obama worries we violate everyone else's rights while he violates ours.

and david says i support releasing gitmo prisoners at 35,000 feet with no parachute. and forrest says, judge, your job is to continue to fear monger? hey, forrest, my job is to state the facts. if you get your head out of the sand, you'd realize that there is a lot to be afraid of. and hassan says, why do you think the middle east is evil? hey, hassan, i am of middle eastern decent. i am a lebanese christian. i don't think the middle east is evil. i think isis is evil. radical islamists are evil. people who behead a evil. people who rape women and children are evil. i believe a vast majority of people in the middle east want peace and don't to want live in fear. and vera says who are you to give the president advice? hey, a, with the president is living in a fantasy world or

disconnected from reality. my advice to the president, you shouldn't go golfing after beheading an american. or you shouldn't lie to the american people is about fundamental decorum, decenty and trust and justice. and by the way, it seems that most americans based on tuesday's election agree with me. and shane says, judge, i love your show, but let's be real. it's our job to protect ourselves. and now for the results of tonight's instant poll. what message did voters send on election day. brett says people are getting obama figured out and voted to go in the other direction. matt says, anti-obama vote, not the rock star he was on election night. debbie says we are sick of the dictator. andrew, hit the trail, obama, and don't let the door slam behind you and jan says we don't

like your policies your life, and we don't like your covering up of countless misdeeds. ed, we're mad as hell and not going to take it anymore. sharon, americans are taking back our country. and robert says here we go, giving republicans a second chance to blow it again. hope not. and vera says you people in two years, you'll be on your knees, regret. that's it for us tonight. remember, don't ever miss justice. just set your dvr and tell your friends to do the same. thanks for joining us. remember, friend me on facebook, follow me on twitter at judge jeanine. see use next week, same time and same place. am julie bandaras t

watching, mike huckabee starts right now. >> republicans have control of the senate. and so what issues should they tackle first. >> repeal obama care and immigration reform or key stone pipeline. and the electorial map and a sea of red. are southern democrats becoming extinct. and a high school senior stands up for her rights under good. all that and more on huckabee. and welcome to huckabee, from