tv Outnumbered FOX News December 8, 2014 9:00am-10:01am PST
9:00 am
>> shannon and i will be back in an hour. "outnumbered" starts right now. >> this is "outnumbered." here with us today -- and today's hashtag one lucky guy, tv personality and veterans advocate, montel williams. he's back and outnumbered. >> welcome back. >> good to be back. >> it's great to see you. >> you guys have been firing up every day. as much as i can catch you, i catch you. >> that's nice. that's great. >> i want to make sure i'm prepared if you ever did ask me
9:01 am
back. >> that's what i said last time, too. >> just a couple of weeks ago with the release of sergeant and montel, you played a huge role on that and i think on behalf of everyone in the studio, thank you. >> thanks to all the fox viewers. were it not for you guys putting extra pressure on and believe me, the mexican government understood that. lawyers involved understood that but i just talked to andrew yesterday. this story is not over and i have to make sure america remembers, there's another 2,000, 3,000 andrews. they may not have been in jail but they're suffering. this young man is diagnosed with combat ptsd and now he truly is -- that's stockholm syndrome and we haven't had anybody treated for that in this country for 25 years. this man is sitting in limbo right now. i talked to him yesterday and i'm trying to talk to him every day. a lot of marines are sending hope and help and we're trying to reach out to different
9:02 am
facilities around the country to find a qualified place for him to be. >> you bring up the point, there are so many more in that psychological state he's in now. >> and it's the holiday season. remember them. >> remember them. thanks to you and greta and bill o'reilly and others. you've been on the front pages. thank you. >> back to greta one more time, she was so instrumental also:a.: we sat in a hotel room. the week before he was released, it was myself, governor richardson, congressmen in a hotel room back behind the restaurant in san diego. they were going across the border almost every other day trying to get him out. so thank you, thank you. >> thank you. >> all right. right now u.s. diplomatic and military posts on alert worldwide as a battle is raging over a plan by senate democrats
9:03 am
to release a highly controversial report on c.i.a. activity since 9/11. it alleges the abuse and torture of retain yees. releasing the report could have dire consequences. >> i think this is a terrible idea. our foreign partners are telling us this will cause violence and death. our foreign leaders have approached the government and said you do this, it will cause violence and death. our own intelligence committee has assessed that this will cause violence and death. >> but the chair of senate intelligence democrat dianne feinstein pushing for the report's release saying in an interview, quote, we have to get this report out and adding that the interrogations undermine constitutional values we are very proud of. she is adamant about releasing
9:04 am
the c.i.a. report despite word from a phone call from secretary of state john kerry to hold off. john kerry warning this is going to jeopardize men and women in the field now as well as relationships that we have with our allies. is this intelligence and this alleged torture tactic getting out? >> rock and a hard place. so sorry. this whole country is in between a rock and a hard place on this issue. we have to remember that we signed on to treaties years and years ago that said we wouldn't do certain things. i'm not going to argue whether they were done or they weren't. what i'm going to say is right now, we're sitting in a position where even administration, when we come back to the central issue, that central issue is, had this never happened, we wouldn't have to worry about releasing reports. let's just say one thing about this. those who would give up central
9:05 am
liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. that's benjamin franklin. >> in the last hour we talked about the fact they puts people in imminent danger and that to him as someone who has been there, who has been in the field, who is so respected, that is illogical. it makes no sense. it's hard to ignore that opinion. >> i've been in the field, too. >> these techniques have been stopped, these are techniques allegedly used in the bush administration so why now if they've been stopped? >> i have some questions about that. i want to go straight to senator dianne feinstein, though, because she's exiting her role as the chairperson of the intel committee as you mentioned. it isn't just getting the report out. she's pushed against the white house because they wanted to redact 15% of it. she wants people to see what she had to say on the reported. i would ask, is this personal?
9:06 am
why the timing now? the other part of this, though, and you talk about the general that i spoke to this morning. he said they didn't talk to one person who was doing the interrogating about this report. if they put it out there and it endangers us, is it worth it if it might not be as fact ral as it could be? >> brit hume called the timing of this inhe c ehe ca ehe ca eh inexplicable. they could be trying to get this off her desk or changing the narrative. the last time democrats were screaming about this, they were winning elections. they defeated tom delay's electoral map to take the house with this exact discussion. are they trying to return to that? >> i think so and i think the fear is that if it's delayed and she's no longer heading the committee, is this dropped altogether and then will she be
9:07 am
held accountable by some members of community that you didn't handle this correctly? this is a promise, remember, barack obama has been talking about it for a long time. my key point is the justice department investigated this. they found no criminal charges. they filed no criminal charges. why are they doing this now? and the issue here, people keep saying this is the wrong time. they should delay this. when is it a good time to release it? >> never going to be a good time. look in the 1970's. i talked to k.t. mc far mand -- mc farland right now. you had a similar situation and you also gutted the c.i.a. such that in the 1980's for the first time, we saw people plotting in caves against us, ala al qaeda. her big question is not only about timing but when would a good time ever be? >> i remember one of the first things administration did when president obama came into office was pursue legal action for
9:08 am
techniques. this is a return to that even though the techniques had been stopped. it makes you wonder, why now? united states has transferred six guantanamo bay detainees to uruguay. this is the largest grup to leave the prison since 2009 and the first to be resettled in south america. group includes four syrians, one palestinian and one tunisian. that brings the number of prisoners now hit at gtmo down to 136. once administration gets that number below 100, it's believed the president will push to bring the remaining detainees to a u.s. facility. i want to go on this one. this is a little different than what we saw with the birdall transfer. this is a release. former federal prosecutor was on earlier and he said there's no preconditions with this one. not like in qatar where they have to watch the detainees. they are free to go today, the
9:09 am
president of uruguay saying as much. >> what are they going to do with hostilities are over? even by the geneva convention or any other conventional war, you have to do something with the people they're holding. they're p.o.w.'s. let's just keep them. let's keep them there. but what are you going to do with them? >> how are hostilities over? i don't get that. this is the broader issue on the war on terror and these guys were suspected of having militant, very strong ties to al qaeda. that isn't over. >> never been tried, okay. then let's just hold them. then what happens? >> i don't know at what point we're going to say the hostilities are over. >> so let's just hold them forever. as you stretch out for decades, 132, or 146, they cost $3 million a year. $3 million a year. we're spending half a billion -- >> i don't know. we spend a lot of money on a lot of things to try to keep us safe
9:10 am
and i'm all -- >> is the money worth it when you have a rate of 30% when we release them? >> i think it is. >> they return to the war on terror and they go back and kill our soldiers. >> when they go back out and kill one more of the soldiers, it would have been worth the money to keep them. i'm a money girl. this is one of the case where is it seems like it makes sense. what happens to them while they are being detained is one thing we have to keep a close eye on. that was the last conversation. but detaining them at this point seems like the money is well spent. >> i want to address the politics of this again. this is another campaign promise by barack obama in 2009 to close guantanamo bay. i think we talked about before the c.i.a. report. i think the president is very concerned about his legacy right now and i think the reason the stories are front and center is because he's about to exit and he wants to make sure that left wing base, now he's going to speak to universities, do a lot of things out there in the community.
9:11 am
he wants to make sure they understand at the end of this, he wants to get stuff done that he promised initially and he wasn't forgetting about them. >> i would take it a further step than that. it wasn't just a campaign promise. first week of his presidency in 2009 he signed an executive order to make this happen. so it was more than just i might get it done. i am going to get this done. it's 2014, almost the next year. 2015. it still hasn't been done yet. so my question, is this a slippery slope? are we looking at a situation where he's going to expedite the closing of gtmo and then how do we hold the other countries responsible and accountable for when these guys leave their soil and go do horrible things? >> and we get rid of the most dangerous. that was the concern with the birdall flop. they got rid of the most dangerous ones. you can almost justify, the really dangerous ones are out of there. low level offenders are not as big of a deal. no preconditions. they can walk today. why send them to a country that can't at least keep them on house arrest or monitor them?
9:12 am
not saying qatarg to do a great job but -- >> i have no idea why the president thought he could do this. i get what you're saying by attempting to close this. it's impossible for him to close guantanamo bay in the next two years. it's not going to get done. here are six people they put back out in the field to go back to work. >> right. >> and they'll be heros when they return. >> with regard to other countries watching, if we couldn't keep up with the brothers who, you know, suspected of pulling off the boston bombing, if we couldn't do that on our own soil and we have an n.s.a. that it practically look at each naval on the couch, if we can't do it, why do we expect other countries to? >> it will be easier for him to end it if he doesn't acknowledge what they're doing. new questions about an explosion ive article on roll stone
9:13 am
magazine that sparked demonstrations on one college camp us and shut down the greek system. now the magazine is apologizing for the story but how did the mainstream media get duped so easily? and you've seen the protests in response to the recent grand jury decisions of the police killings. the law school is now allowing students to postpone their final exams if they feel traumatized by what happened. and right after the show, catch more from the couch on the web. join us for the famous "outnumbered overtime" by logging on to fox news.com/o news.com/outnumber news.com/outnumbered. comments, anything you would like to hear more about. fox news.com. out for a bike rid
9:14 am
9:15 am
before you begin an aspirin regimen. that's the way i look at life. looking for something better. especially now that i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib, a type of irregular heartbeat, not caused by a heart valve problem. i was taking warfarin, but wondered if i kept digging, could i come up with something better. my doctor told me about eliquis... for three important reasons. one, in a clinical trial, eliquis was proven to reduce the risk of stroke better than warfarin. two, eliquis had less major bleeding than warfarin. and three, unlike warfarin, there's no routine blood testing. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding, like unusual bruising.
9:16 am
9:17 am
>> welcome back to "outnumbered." new questions about the explosive rolling stone article alleging a gang rape at a university of virginia party. the article sparked protests on campus. the shutting down of the greek system and widespread condemnation. then jackie's story began to fall part and rolling stones issued an apology on friday. it said in the face of new
9:18 am
information, there's discrepancy in the account and we've come to the conclusion that the trust in her was misplaced. that sparked outrage from activists saying the magazine was blaming the victim. then rolling stone said given all the reports, however, we've come to the conclusion we were mistaken in jackie's request to not contact the university. meantime, groups representing frats and sororities, urging u.v.a. to end the suspension of greek organizations saying it's hurt the reputation of students who had nothing to do with the allegations. this story has been incredible to me. how they released this without investigating it properly is beyond me. that's a whole other conversation about journalist. but at this point, the apology, which they've just changed, is this enough? they originally blamed the victim and now they're saying it's our fault. >> rolling stone was had. they were had. >> big time. >> they're a mess. they're an absolute mess.
9:19 am
we talked about the death of legitimate journalism on this couch. this is evidence of that. what rolling stone did by essentially being lazy and all too quick to jump to push this narrative of rape culture forward is it turned rape on a serious -- the worse thing a woman could go through into a national joke and trivialized this. i think this reporter, sabrina, should be fired immediately and never aa aa neverallowed to write again. "the washington post" said two of her friends were not consulted. they didn't even bother talking to the friends. the friends were asked last night if that was their account and they said, no. that's not what we said. >> what about the editors? where were the editors? i've been a journalist for a long time. you never run a one source story. that was just incredible to me, especially on something so serious that is going to cause
9:20 am
so much reaction. you know, if the reporter was sucked in and didn't want to check the sources, there should have been several editors saying if we're going to put the name of our may go sglen on the line and our reputation, we have to at least talk to the other side. i mean, this is honestly unheard of in journalism. >> i want to talk about the effect of this on sexual assault victims around the country. will this make them less likely to speak out or -- what is the effect on them? this is a problem that exists around the country. this is a real scary problem. we want people to feel comfortable coming forward. >> the fact we're asking a question, there's some woman sitting at home, if something happened to her last night, she's going, i'm not going to pick up the phone. somebody's daughter feels that way right now listening to this discussion right here. now we're not judging the victim but judging whether or not the victim was telling the truth or whether or not -- i'm not commenting on what we're talking about. i'm just selling you, there's a girl at home who heard this conversation and said i'm not
9:21 am
going to say a word to anybody. and now she suffers in silence. what do we do? maybe change the narrative from one of whether or not, you know, rolling stone -- they got it wrong. they were wrong. and the public should let them know by not buying the may gazm. any young lady out here right now today, even listening to this conversation right here among four women, if you were abused yesterday, you have the right to come forward. skip the news report. go see somebody. >> go to the police. >> let's also talk about the fact that it's 2014, maybe 2015 and we still allow police departments, municipalities called university polices, police officers to investigate these crimes on campuses. these are people -- some of these people don't even have a job, have been university police officers for 15 years and that's the person who is going to investigate the rape of your daughter? never been in the field? >> i think a lot of these universities take this issue
9:22 am
very seriously. >> a lot of them don't take it as seriously as they should. >> i think they feel a very, very huge amount of pressure from the white house and this administration to take it seriously and i think schools like u.v.a. to think that they did nothing about this. if the story was true, which it's not. >> i'm not going to the story. >> i don't think there's women saying they're not going to come forward because of the conversation we're having right now. >> no. >> i disagree. >> i think rolling stone put someone out there who didn't have a credible story. it's rolling stone's fault that someone at home is having second thoughts about this. if you're going to come forward, you should come forward and you shoulding telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth. >> what about the university here and what about these fraternities that have been tarnished that are saying we did nothing wrong and now we're labelled as x, y and z? what should they be doing? >> right now they're trying to get a repeal on the moratorium on them. they haven't been able to operate as they had been before
9:23 am
the article came out. they're appealing the process with the university so i've read as of yesterday, it hadn't been revolved yet so they could open their doors on the way they usually operate. a couple of things come to mind about this whole thing with the journalistic end of it. this young woman according to the two friends you mentioned and others that they've since talked about because "the washington post" now talked with people, have said something happened that night and it may not have been the way that jackie said it did but they witnessed a change in her, that something happened. and that is my concern. that throughout this whole process, because rolling stone didn't do its due diligence, they didn't get to the truth. maybe she just simply couldn't tell it. maybe she was bad at telling it. she was drunk that night. whatever the situation is. but they fell down in two counts. not just in journalism but they let her down, too. >> the hope is that someone will get to the true story and it won't deter anyone who is suffer to go come forward. >> rolling stone is now fiction. you can categorize in the
9:24 am
fiction section at libraries. protests not to indict white police officers in the deaths of black men turning violent over the weekend and it comes as a new poll think that relations between white and black communities have gotten worse since president obama was elected. is it really his fault? speaking of the grnd jury decisions, one of the top law schools in america letting students delay their finals if they're suffering, quote, trauma from all of this. is that any way to treat future lawyers, columbia? you're driving along,
9:25 am
having a perfectly nice day, when out of nowhere a pick-up truck slams into your brand new car. one second it wasn't there and the next second... boom! you've had your first accident. now you have to make your first claim. so you talk to your insurance company and... boom! you're blindsided for a second time. they won't give you enough money to replace your brand new car. don't those people know you're already shaken up? liberty mutual's new car replacement will pay for the entire value of your car plus depreciation. call and for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident.
9:26 am
9:27 am
mhere's our new trainer! ensure active heart health. heart: i'm going to focus on the heart. i minimize my sodium and fat... gotta keep it lean and mean. pear: uh-oh. heart: i maximize good stuff like my potassium... and phytosterols, which may help lower cholesterol. major: i'm feeling energized already. avo: new delicious ensure active heart health supports your heart and body, so you stay active and strong. ensure. take life in.
9:28 am
9:29 am
california, police firing tear gas after they say protestors threw rocks and bottles at them. president obama addressed racism during his weekly address. watch. >> this something that is deeply rooted in our society, in our history but the two things that are going to allow us to solve it, number one, is the understanding that we have made progress and so it's important to recognize as painful as these incidents are, we can't equate what's happening now to what was happening 50 years ago. >> and from that interview, we go to this. a new poll finding 53% of adults say race relations have gotten worse since president obama took office in 2009. it's worth noting, 45% of blacks agreed with what you're looking at there. i want to go to you first. i really have one overarching question. we've moved weeks beyond the first non indictment, grand jury non indictment that was ferguson, missouri and now we've
9:30 am
had a second here in new york city but we're talking days from that. what do people in the streets want? >> if you look at what happened in berkeley and oakland, those people weren't even out there because of this issue. lights start to get ba to where we should probably attempt to do this for the first time in reality in this country and have a real discussion about race. we don't do it. we keep pointing at our directions, believing our people and making sure that you have to be wrong and you have to be wrong. we can't even stop for a second and have a discussion. until we do, this is going to happen. it's going to get worse. again, this was occupy. remember, let's look at the faces. zoom in a little bit. about three weeks ago in ferguson, you saw a majority of black faces. now you see multi ethnic, multi facial. so again, the discussion is not about are we more racist today
9:31 am
than yesterday? do we hate more black people today than yesterday? why don't we have a discussion about what's the problem? and discuss it. >> i think one of the bigs -- big problems is financial. it has to do with the federal reserve policy. the main thing that's increased has been the stock market. that's obl benefitted people who are wealthy enough to invest there. i think that the income gap has widened dramatically. >> this is what i'm talking about. this is excuse. we will not talk about the problem. >> you don't think money is part of the problem? >> no. look. if money is the problem, how about the fact right now we have over 53% of congress that are millionaires plus and 28% are multi millionaires and 15 years ago we didn't have that. so what's going on in despairity in this country, maybe the people passing some laws don't give a damn about the people no matter what color they are. >> i think we're making the same point. i don't think we were disagreeing there. >> let's talk race.
9:32 am
race is the problem. in this country right now today, there are certain cities where blacks stand a chance of being incarcerated at 100 times more than any other race. in this city alone. >> you bring up the point, though, and it's -- >> you don't think that's financially motivated either? you don't think it's about people trying to make money? money drives all these things. >> it's just a game. >> seems like the only time we talk about this is when people are rioting in the streets. >> correct. something right now the narrative has become, how many buildings are they going to burn rather than let's get back to the actual thing. if people are upset about the court system in the country, i don't hear anybody talking about that. >> the problem is when i was in the midst of these protests in new york, though, what i saw from a lot of people, people taking selfies, people partying. there was a segment of the population that protest just to protest and aren't really interested in having a discussion. it's easy to blame president obama for this but it's not his fault. this is a community based
9:33 am
problem. it has to start at the dinner table, among families. disrespe >> there's the word. family. the breakdown of the family. this is not something that's just in the black community. the breakdown of the american family among whites, hispanics, go down the list. and i do agree with you on the money perspective but i think family and the breakdown of family is a huge part of a lot of this. >> that's a huge issue. >> as long as we don't talk about the issue, it won't get solved. >> we'll shift over to the alma mater. columbia university is allowing its law school students to postpone their final exam if they feel like they're taum tied by the eric garner and michael brown shootings. it may be too much for them to bear. >> i'm dying here z. we have arranged to have a trauma specialist next monday and wednesday for anyone interested
9:34 am
in participating to discuss the trauma that recent events may have caused. students who feel their performance on examinations will be sufficiently impaired due to the recent events may have a petition to have their examinations rescheduled. >> are you okay? >> i can see me walking up to my professor right now and saying, sir, last week a crane broke in the middle of the street and i can't study for my exam right now because i don't understand why that crane broke. i'm trying to do the math and i'm so traumatized. are you kidding me? >> i think that makes more sense. >> they are claiming they're going to build high powered attorneys out of this program. what lesson are they teaching kids at this level that you can cry if you don't like a decision? >> drop out and major basket weaving. don't defend me in court.
9:35 am
>> i want to go back to something melissa said. it isn't white, black, brown. it's grown. the despairity in wealth and creating jobs is a big issue here. i would challenge the universities, rather than letting the kids off the hook, have them a way to create jobs in this country and give extra credit for the exams they want to miss. >> if you're a parent as well, wouldn't you be ticked off? you're paying like $60,000 a year to go to columbia and your kid is given a break. if anything, that f that were my major, i would be more empassioned. i would be more ready to go. >> turn my life over to you. >> and to your point, harris, be a little creative in you're a professor. go to the constructive end of semester final exam. >> isn't this why you get into law? because you want to go out there and forge ahead and make the right thing happen, whatever side you believe in this? it should make you want to get
9:36 am
in there and dig deeper. not take a break because you're traumatized. >> by doing all of this, by setting the reading groups to formulate a response to the implications, they're saying we didn't like the decisions and columbia university should not put that out there in their classrooms. that's not for them to decide and not to dictate policy on. we have to go but some people are saying bah hum bug to a dazzling display of good lights in one neighborhood. ♪
9:37 am
9:38 am
come from all walks of life. if you have high blood sugar, ask your doctor about farxiga. it's a different kind of medicine that works by removing some sugar from your body. along with diet and exercise, farxiga helps lower blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes. with one pill a day, farxiga helps lower your a1c. and, although it's not a weight-loss or blood-pressure drug, farxiga may help you lose weight and may even lower blood pressure when used with certain diabetes medicines. do not take if allergic to farxiga or its ingredients. symptoms of a serious allergic reaction include rash, swelling or difficulty breathing or swallowing. if you have any of these symptoms, stop taking farxiga and seek medical help right away. do not take farxiga if you have severe kidney problems, are on dialysis, or have bladder cancer.
9:39 am
tell your doctor right away if you have blood or red color in your urine or pain while you urinate. farxiga can cause serious side effects, including dehydration, genital yeast infections in women and men, low blood sugar,kidney problems, and increased bad cholesterol. common side effects include urinary tract infections, changes in urination, and runny nose. ♪do the walk of life ♪yeah, you do the walk of life need to lower your blood sugar? ask your doctor about farxiga and visit our website to learn how you may be able to get every month free.
9:40 am
9:41 am
that makes sense. a santa's workshop and more. but despite all the joy, neighbors have complained about the traffic and the litter and the city reportedly says the so-called hyatt extreme christmas poses public safety concerns. but to some visitors, christmas wouldn't be the same without the annual display. >> we love to share this with our family and kids every year. >> what are some of your favorite things? >> the lights and the jesus scene over there. >> it is lovely but ladies and gentlemen, i have to say, 200,000 lights. they keep it all within their fence but there's a lot of people coming to look. the police say they're un un-bridled zeal. >> what a bunch of grinches. when i was a kid, i used to have my dad and my mom get in the car and drive around to see all the christmas lights. that was the highlight of my holiday season. if people want to have a go
9:42 am
ahead time and you deal with extra traffic, it's the christmas season. >> smile and be gritful. >> a lot of people are driving around and around and around this house. the neighbors don't like t. police came up and set up a line so you have to walk to see it. then the family shoots back and they say, what about the disabled? what about people in wheelchairs? facebook some people are saying bah humbug. you should do with the cry baby neighbors instead. somebody else said, again, move in next to these people and watch strange men pee on your lawn. >> hello. >> whoa. >> there always was that house and i remember growing up, i remember the house and we always used to drive by it and it reminds me a lot of bob bickell's house. he does thousands and thousands of lights and because he's bob -- >> it's hard for me to remember.
9:43 am
>> i can't imagine people -- >> i was there. >> there are no facilities outside. that's the problem. >> no bathrooms. >> i was right with you until you mentioned the bushes. >> i can feel for the neighbors. >> this is like the griswolds, though. how much does it cost to light that? >> i tried to look into it. because they have 200,000 light bulbs. it's got to cost a fortune but they made a lot of money because it's been featured on various shows. >> do they charge? >> i don't think they charge. they let people in but they've made a lot of money off shows and other things. online somebody said, what does a ferris wheel have to do with christmas? >> why not? >> i think they have it in the north pole. i saw it on the north pole movies. there's always like teddy bears and stuff going around. >> i watched the movie. think about this, though. people next door, you have guys standing in the bushes.
9:44 am
maybe it can be set up for certain hours. >> how about a viewing stand? >> i don't know. >> also concerns i remember back in our how many town that around the lights, people would smoke marijuana and drive by. all kinds of great christmas traditions. thank you for that, andrea. the expiration dates on happy marriages may be happier than you think. why the seven year itch is revised upwards. uh-oh. here's some news you may find surprising.
9:47 am
9:48 am
>> more "outnumbered in ant." first let's go to jon scott for what's happening in the second hour of "happening now." >> we're having a good time here, harris. we're waiting news on a spending bill. apparently both sides are working on a deal to fund the government at least through september. what is in it? that's where the double lies. plus a small jet crashes into a home in maryland. it all broke during the first hour of "happening now." that home taching fire. we'll have an update. also the dow flirting with 18,000 on friday, closing at
9:49 am
another record high. today a bit of backsliding and new revelations about the giant hack attack on sony. >> dow is such a flirt. >> it is. >> jon scott, good to see you. >> thanks, harris. >> i may be outnumbered but now it's my turn for this story. watch this. marital bliss may last longer than you think. seven-year itch has been a popular theory since marilyn monroe starred in the same movie in 1955. she became the love interest of a married man and since then psychologists have said some women begin to hit the rocks after seven years as couples get the roving eyes. a new study finds that a 10-year itch is actually closer to the truth. i'm going to throw it to you guys but i'm in my seventh year of marriage and i couldn't be happier in my life. >> no itching? >> not itchy in the least. >> okay. one thing i liked in the study,
9:50 am
it said that couples begin to bibbingary the 10 years but then hit a new crescendo at 15 years. i've been marry 15d years because i got married when i was 12 and -- >> so i was like, rock on. i've made it. like i'm through to the other side. there you go. >> 10 years, is that when stress comes to hit? you have some munchkins running around, you're saving for college, working, have daycare, i'm wondering if that's 10 years of all that's precious. >> we'll be in the 12th in april. when we hit the 10th year, it's like with your body every 10 years, you do a reassessment of the things that are working, not working and i think marriage is the same way. there's decade points when you really start to take stock of what's working and what's not. if you love each other, you work on those things. if not, just take separate vacations. >> now the body analogy, i keep thinking about the body and how
9:51 am
it gets sage and wrinkly. >> what are you talking about? you have to work at it. >> marriage spanx. >> there we go. andrea, we have come up with something. >> marriage spanx. >> patent office? >> it's christmas time. how about we help everybody how to make their relationships a little better right now. i have a tip for you. write this on the refrigerators today and before you discuss, you have a conversation with your discuss, read these lines. speak without offending and the second one is listening without defending. if you have a conversation, getting ready to happen over the holidays, grab your spouse by the hand, walk to the kitchen, look at the card and go, okay. speak without offending. listen without defending. that can defuse any kind of argument because you never point anybody out. >> i want to build on your theme. my husband always says never email before breakfast.
9:52 am
i have low blood sugar. if there's a contractor or somebody that needs to be talked to, he says please email phil before breakfast. i know what that means. but i have to have coffee and a little something in my stomach before i can speak without offending. >> for good marriages? >> or relation shis. are you married? >> no. but i'm saying -- >> she's like not after this i'm not. >> people get itchy after a year, two years. are you asking if i have a saying? >> yeah. >> do you know what rhymes with friday? vodka. that's what's on my refrigerator. >> goodness. >> i guess i could help that. >> that helps. back to the theory, montel, some have a theory you change so much. i'm not the same person i was when i was 20. >> you look the same. >> thank you.
9:53 am
you're a very kind woman. you also need glasses. what about the theory that says longivity is not possible? it's not realistic because partners change so much. >> try to embrace the change rather than look at it as something that's offensive to your relationship. i embrace every change my wife has and i'm lacking forward to the ones she's going to have five years from now. hollywood romance movie. it's about the first couple. their first date. actress has already been picked to portray michelle obama but who will be cast to play a young barack obama in his days of courtship? hmmm. you're driving along, having a perfectly nice day, when out of nowhere a pick-up truck slams into your brand new car. one second it wasn't there and the next second...
9:54 am
boom! you've had your first accident. now you have to make your first claim. so you talk to your insurance company and... boom! you're blindsided for a second time. they won't give you enough money to replace your brand new car. don't those people know you're already shaken up? liberty mutual's new car replacement will pay for the entire value of your car plus depreciation. call and for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. switch to liberty mutual insurance and you could save up to $423 dollars. call liberty mutual for a free quote today at see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance.
9:57 am
9:58 am
tika hunter will play michelle obama. who do you pick for barak obama besides yourself? >> i am just in shock that they are going to do a movie about that point in time. >> chadwick bosman. he made a career out of the doing biographys. and right there in action and super hero kind of have it all. i can't believe they haven't settled on him. >> tyler james williams is age appropriate at the time barak and michelle met. and i was doing a research. the back up dancer, we do have a picture. >> i love that song. >> we have a photo.
9:59 am
>> i will take your word for it. >> i need a time machine so we can go back. we need denzil who was my fake boyfriend. he is to old now. >> why did you pick him? >> he is denzilwashington. >> you are welcome. >> you could have said anything. >> i pick lance gross. you know him? he's most famous of playing calvin pa yne in tiler peri. i think he is really good looking. >> there is nothing wrong with that. >> you are yelling at me for den zil? >> come on! >> and he locks like it.
10:00 am
great to have you. >> thank you. love to be back. and happy holidays. >> great to have you here. >> and stay towned for fox outnumbered on the web. "happening now". >> we await the release of the report of cia interrogations of terrorist suspects after 9/11. >> some insists that the 6000 page report needs to be released and others warn its release would put many lives in danger, on "happening now". >> the intelligence report that a powerful democrat plans to release. and what does it say about the cia activity and will its report endanger people's lives. >> and dramatic 911 calls and center stage in a montana home
308 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=1485085187)