here with us today -- today's hashtag one lucky guy, dr. keith apalo and he's "outnumbered." that's my prescription. >> i welcome in. i like it. it's a challenge for me now anywhere else. i feel less at home than in the middle of this circle. >> are you analyzing us at all? >> no. i can't turn it on and off like a faucet. sometimes i have to say i'm not following that threat. we were talking about this even before the show. but it's hard to turn it off. i hear things. after 20 years of doing this, you hear things and you think well should i comment on that? >> are you hearing voices? >> it's a little like that.

>> we'll do analysis during "outnumbered" overnight. >> did we unconsciouslynate our outfits today? i thought that. >> that's cute. >> are we that much in tune? >> i have a prediction this is the only thing you two will agree on is the color scheme. >> i don't know. >> we have fierce new reaction how the obama administration is handling that mass beheading of isis or 21 egyptian coptic christians isis. white house summit gets underway what the white house calling violent extremism. the white house also issuing a statement saying, quote, the united states condemns the despicable and cowardly murder of 21 egyptian citizens in libya by isis affiliated terrorists. that's right. citizens. administration for some reason does not call them christians and refers to the islamic

fighters as isis affiliated terrorists. omissions that sparked this reaction from fox news contributors george will and charles krauthammer. >> it's beyond burlesque. the secret of decent strong communication, specificity, this is a genocidal movement. you kill christians you kill jews but you may in certain circumstances play them. that's what we're up again and we have an administration that will not even admit there's a religious basis underlying what's going on. >> even pope francis is claiming the men were executed over their religious beliefs asking his followers to pray for those, quote, whose throats were slit for the sole reason of being christian. i want to go to you first.

the byte of george will where he called it political, what was your first thought? >> first thought was better he say it than i say it. i get so much heat when i say the president has something about his way of being that's deeply rooted inside him that does not sit well with this country and with the notion of joining forces for autonomy and freedom and identifying real threats for what they are. there's something deeply engrained in our president that can't embrace america as a force for good in the world as a leader for good. and i've said it again and again and now it's coming home to roost. >> is that -- okay. some people have said that the president is delusional that he does not understand the threat but for your analysis to be correct, he understands the threat but something is preventing him from identifying it.

is it his childhood? i go back to the cairo speech. he takes his mind back to a child when he remembers a peaceful islam, the threat won't exist if he doesn't ak no, ma'amming it. >> he's balancing threats and to the president of the united states, i believe that the united states of america is the bigger threat. that he sees that our focus on autonomy, our desire to spread our ideas around the world has been a great plague and he's you know really not up for the idea of saying, i'm with these guys above them. he sees them as people who have been put upon. that's where this whole notion comes from. build the economies, get them jobs and then they'll like us again. they won't like us again. there's fundamentally in a fundamentalist way aware of our existence. >> i'm glad you brought up unemployment and jobs because a lot of people are talking today about how the spokeswoman for

the u.s. state department blamed part of this problem on the fact that the terrorists don't have jobs. listen to this. >> we cannot win this war by killing them. we cannot kill our way out of the war. we need to go after the root causes that leads people to join these groups. whether it's lack of opportunity for jobs. you can work with countries around the world to help them improve their governance to build their economy. >> okay. it's a jobs problem. >> okay. there are two jobs problems. job problems in this country. this is where people need jobs. this is where people need to focus on the economy. that's completely misplacing the focus. number two those coptic christians were going to libya where they knew there was terrorists and strive because they couldn't get jobs because of religious persecution in egypt. they went to find a better way of life in a very dangerous place looking for work because they needed jobs and that's what they were doing. so that's misgided.

>> isis is not hurting for money. they're making up to $3 million a day on selling oil in the black market so they're not hurting for jobs. it's not about jobs. it's not about the poor families. i was proud of chris matthews for going up against her when she gave that answer because he pushed back and said we're going to be dealing with poor families and jobs until eternity so i was glad that he at least stood up. >> rachel that excuse. there's so many things with what she said that we're supposed to fix their problems and historically take hamas as an example. hamas doesn't want to work. these are terrorist organizations that could go out and get jobs and they don't. they just perpetuate this cycle of terrorism. what was the state department trying to say? >> bush administration did used to say that part of the problem was edemic to the economy, lack of jobs for young people in the united states. that narrative was started under

the bush administration. i think what we're seeing now is that this islamic cult o theology that isis has has mess as as -- metastasized. the pope is not very bellicose. there are christians like myself who have been waiting for the pope to actually call out. the persecution of christians has been going on for several years and we've known about this and waiting for him to say something. why can't this administration just say -- call it what it is. >> when you said malignancy, that has it well said. you have to treat it and that might mean surgery which means we have to go and stop these people, frankly, by killing them. not an attractive thing to do. no joy in it. but a surgeon will tell you,

look. if we have to take off the leg, we're not going to talk about nutrition right now. >> or the surgeon has to treat it and not the architect. we're not the oncologist. >> we are. >> not for jobs. not talking about the economy. >> the surgery is to remove the folks from existence because it's as simple as this. if someone wants to kill my children and that's their intent, i'm going to kill them. that's it. that's the arithmetic. >> to her point, she said she can't just kill them alone. there are other things we can do, right? we can bomb their oil fields. we can start to hurt them and cripple them economically but this whole theory about words, so the pope weighed in on this. we've seen others weigh in on this and you hear people say if more people from the moderate muslim community would speak out against it it would solve it. i don't believe this problem can be fixed by words or a p.r. campaign. >> right. just like if you have a problem with your child or problem in

your relationship you have to find out the root of the problem. what's causing them to do this? it's religion. i feel like our president is not saying that. i don't know if he's scared that he's going to antagonize muslims but he's got to go to the root of the problem if we want to win the war. if it is about religion, is there any way -- i mean do we go in and just kill them? you can't change their minds. >> what's scary, we're hearing part of the president's strategy if you want to call it that is a twitter war, not a real war. there's a whole social media campaign that they want to talk about. i'm so confused. i have little kids who have -- you know, they watch the needs they see isis and they go why don't we just kill them? little kids even get that. >> can i bring up what rachel was saying? one of the things that the white house said they would be doing to fight back on this is using twitter and this is a white house that had the hashtag, you

know bring our girls home which i thought was well intentioned but doesn't really matter and we found out isis and terrorists organizations are putting out roughly 90,000 tweets per day. that's startling to see the way they're using social media and that's not even the way to fix it. use social media to combat isis. >> anyone has to see that isis is suck he'dceeding where other terror groups haven't. i think that that is probably a good idea. that's how people are getting their information and you want to change their mind that's the strategy but i don't know if that should be the focus. when you've got isis five miles from a marine base in iraq, do we really need to be talking about snap chat? >> and one thing about these extremists, these terrorists they're not confused right? we're a little confused about our facebook profiles, our realselves.

should we fight this with twitter? put boots on the ground? they're not confused. they may be using social media to advance the beheadings right? and their cause of taking over the world but they're not confused whether that's a real war. the real war is when they get their knives out and they're just using the twitter as a little appetizer. we're confused but we always have an internet president. we've had a facebook president who is comfortable on the cover of men's magazines and couches of late night tv. he's a star. not a president. >> are we normal or not? we seem to have discussion all the time on this couch right after the fox and friends phrase but we keep asking ourselves, when will the white house do this? when will the white house wake up to the threat? when will the white house start to fight back? the question today is why won't the white house say the word christian? we're using the same question over and over which i think is

this the definition of insanity? are we nuts? >> yes. >> ben carson was on earlier today and he was saying if he were president, he would have boots on the ground. he would be enforcing sanctions. >> he's a surgeon. >> exactly. but it was like five or six different things he said he would be doing. >> can we put this up to a logical test pretty quickly? if you have radical muslims targeting jews and christians in europe and the middle east and there's not a lot of moral outrage from the white house, look at the converse. if you had christians targeting muslims and jews i think you would have a very different reaction. i think that logical test is one that the president is failing. >> i just to want say i think he came into office saying that he wanted to fundamentally transform america. i think there's no doubt right now he's fundamentally transforming the middle east by negligence or intentional negligence. >> very quickly, i think kennedy's point is a good one.

i think the american public gets it. this is a president who has had the muslim brotherhood where it's terrorism's birth place to the white house, to the state department, front row at his cairo speech. he can play favorites when he wants to. >> it would now be delusional. we would be a little crazy to be thinking that it's not intentional negligence. that's a profound thing to believe, by the way. if you believe that the president is intentionally empowering our adversaries, that's a very weighty moment. >> more than weighty. i would say scary. the president's executive orders on immigration now put on hold. just hours before the first part was to take effect and now the white house is responding to a federal ruling that gives dozens of states time to permanently stop the president's plan. plus where president ranks among his 43 predecessors and where he's called overrated and right after the show catch more from

the couch on the web. you don't have to go to therapy. we're going to bring it to you. just log on to fox news.com/outnumbered. click the overtime tab. you can lay down on your couch and send pictures to our couch.

okay, listen up! i'm re-workin' the menu. mayo? corn dogs? you are so outta here! aah! [ female announcer ] the complete balanced nutrition of great-tasting ensure. 24 vitamins and minerals antioxidants and 9 grams of protein. [ bottle ] ensure®. nutrition in charge™.

what's that thing? i moved our old security system out here to see if it could monitor the front yard. why don't you switch to xfinity home? i get live video monitoring and 24/7 professional monitoring that i can arm and disarm from anywhere. hear ye! the awkward teenage one has arrived!!!! don't be old fashioned. xfinity customers add xfinity home for $29.95 a month for 12 months. plus for a limited time, get a free security camera call 1800 xfinity or visit comcast.com/xfinityhome.

>> welcome back to "outnumbered." federal judge in texas is hitting the pause button on the president's executive action on immigration. first part of the order which could spare millions of immigrants with deportation was set to take effect tomorrow. but the president's temporary injunction gives 26 states time to form a lawsuit to restrict the orders. the president says the actions are well within his legal authority and the justice department is vowing to appeal the ruling. what should they do here? >> i don't want to see john boehner near this. i think the states are the ones that have the right to say whether or not they can handle a possible influx of people from -- >> i agree with you. >> canada as well. i do. i don't think that this is something that congress should take up. i think that the courts should handle this and that's where republicans have their best chance of stopping president obama and this is an example of it. the president is kennedy, if

the courts find that this is in violation with the u.s. constitution, which is more of i guess the set of guidelines for the president, if the president defies it then are we on the cusp of a crisis? then what do we do then if he defies the courts? i think that's the story here. >> rachel i want to talk to you about this. this is how you spend your life's work trying to find a balance on immigration because obviously, immigration and immigrants are what made this country great. >> i am the grnd daughter of immigrants. listen. here is the deal. there really was a bipartisan will to deal with immigration reform in this new congress and that's why he went ahead and did the executive order to sort of get in front of that before it could actually happen in the house. here's what's frustrating to me. you've seen the loop holes in the tax code that are permitting undocumented people to perhaps take three years' worth of back

taxes, things in the voting laws that allow for fraud. this is the president once again taking immigration reform that has bipartisan support and making it really divisive. it really makes me mad. hispanics come here to work but the impression he's leaving by having the loop holes, they didn't come here because they want free tacks from the -- or free back taxes but that's the impression it's leaving and it's creating more racial division. i think it's setting back what i think is bipartisan will to do something about immigration. i think it's just -- you talk about psychologically. this is what he does. he divides. >> and it can cast immigrants certainly in an unfair awful light. i agree with you. it's incredibly divisive. how do we fix it? what do you do? >> i know i'm supposed to have answers generally but i have a question. is there precedent and what are the precedents for the president

pardoning millions of people? otherwise, we would have to leave it to the courts. here's this person. this person came here illegally. we have witnesses to attest to his good character. will you issue a pardon in this case, right? from the governor or should we somehow advocate the charges against this individual? so you charge them and then decide, should there be no steps? but i don't know. what is the precedent? is there a time when the president said billions of people, you are pardoned. >> under george h.w. bush and ronald reagan, they had similar -- there were amendments to congressional amnesty that allowed for various -- >> but the scope is so much larger than that and that if you talk to people like the judge and others, they say it's the scope of president obama. >> four million people use social security numbers and he never -- this was testified last week in congress.

he never called the i.r.s. to does ask, what would be the tax implication? >> it would be an email. i'm sure it would have gotten lost. >> the judge is saying the president exceeded his authority so he's saying this needs to be stopped. the judge is saying, this would be ir reversible. we need to stop it now and the judge saying the president is forcing states to spend money they didn't have. >> if you take a lens and you say things that are defined as america are inherently abhorrent to the president, then of course anybody who is a citizen, it's not a big deal. it's just to be given out. right? because that in and of itself is in some way deeply insulting to him. >> i also think he abhors the constitution. why don't they just repeal the law on the books that makes it a crime to come here illegally? if they really don't think it's a crime and they don't want to hold anyone accountable, why

don't they just scratch through the law? that's what they're doing. >> why don't they give out more visas so people who want to come here and work are able to do that and that's what people are talking about when they're talking about fixing a broken system and allowing people to come in and participate. >> that was another area of bipartisan consensus. a lot of hispanics don't even want this decision. they just want to cross the border back and forth. he needs citizenship. part of the deal. >> it was a slap in the face to people that did it the right way. >> we have solved great crisis. president obama, is he overrated? what? that's word from some of the nation's top presidential scholars who have just released their su va of america's most ininfluential leaders. and wisconsin governor walker quickly becoming the one to watch among g.o.p. hopefuls and

that's led one mainstream may go magazine to track down his former teacher. a glimpse into his soul. similar things happened to jeb bush. is it fair or has the media taken it way too far? we'll debate in a moment.

if you're suffering from constipation or irregularity powders may take days to work. for gentle overnight relief, try dulcolax laxative tablets. ducolax provides gentle overnight relief, unlike miralax that can take up to 3 days. dulcolax, for relief you can count on.

how much money do you have in your pocket right now? i have $40 $21. could something that small make an impact on something as big as your retirement? i don't think so. well if you start putting that towards your retirement every week and let it grow over time,

for twenty to thirty years that retirement challenge might not seem so big after all. ♪ ♪ >> welcome back to "outnumbered." with less than two years before he wraps up two terms in the oval office a new brookings institution survey of presidential scholars finding president obama doesn't rank anywhere near history's greats with some even going as far as to call him overrated. here you can see the actual list with president obama ranking 18 out of 44. the scholars also put him on the worst, not best list by a margin of nearly 3-1. why? well according to brookings, it's because they find president obama polarizing and have a mixed view of his military

legislative and diplomatic skills. all right. this is a survey that i agree with. and i think one of the moments i reflect back to is when he got the nobel peace prize and hasn't done anything. now with all the uses of drones which i actually support the president on, i sort of scratch my head on that one, too. >> let me just say this. i don't think it's just about him. i think that it isn't that he just oversold himself or his campaign did him as an individual. they oversold government. they told us that government was going to solve all these problems and we see government grow and grow and grow and we see it didn't work. the i.r.s. is out of scroll. we see more corruption in government so i think it's all of it. he is sort of intimately tied with big government and it's not working. we feel less save less prosperous. i think that's what you see in

these numbers. >> i also think that -- i know when you sit next to me it's hard because we're so --s the expectations were high for president obama. he raised them high. it was your wildest dreams are going to come true but he said we are going to hope and change. >> we are the change we've been waiting for. >> we're the ones. >> it is heavy stuff. >> and he didn't do that. >> he's waiting. >> he divided the country so do you think because the bar was too high? >> it was unrealistic but that's a great thing. it's a wonderful wakeup call for an entire generation of millennials who are galvanized into action and now they're just depressed and unemployed and they realize that you know some of it is not even -- sometimes i feel bad for the president. he had nowhere to go but down. unlike calvin coolidgre.

>> or chester arthur who was such a stud. >> it's interesting. these are scholars. these are 162 members of the american political science association of presidents and executive politics section. this is the premier organization of presidential experts and they're saying they ranked ahead of president obama. clinton, eisenhower reagan, johnson, kennedy and george h.w. bush. >> i will say this about that. he may be one of the worst presidents but one of the most deflective leader. he intentionally eroded our capacity to lead it in the world. he's done it. i don't know if any other person could single handedly do as much damage as this man has intentionally done. >> it's an interesting point. people say he's been terrible in what he's doing but he's done a tremendous amount of damage. wisconsin governor from rachel's home state, scott walker has been emerging lately from a

possible field of candidates. as his popularity grows, mainstream media is getting more aggressive. there's an interview with get this walker's high school science teacher. she would have told him to quote, man up. the article focuses on walker's recent trip to england where he dodged the question about evolution. he later tweeted that both science and his faith dictate the bloef that we are created by god. his former teacher told the may go -- magazine said that he should have faced the question right away. is this fair game? high school all the way back to high school? >> kindergarten. here's the thing. it's okay. in other words, a great leader and an open person can take all that data and say, let me think

about that. mrs. anderson back in science class, i don't know if we gelled but let me tell you, she has a point here. i should speak clearly and from the heart. i don't see what the big threat is and i would be really really criticizing myself if i didn't say that i think everything is relevant going back to you know, being one. so i think that it's okay. in fact, i think our political leaders, if we choose them based on everything we know about them, back to their upbringing, we would be better off. >> why is it that we know more about -- why is it that we know more today about scott walker's high school days than we do about obama's six years into his term? >> i'm more concerned about his college grades that he never released. >> i agree. >> you're certainly more fully formed in college. a lot of people get a pass for the things they did in college and the majority are pen candidates. they don't bother looking back there because i was a disaster. it's not necessarily fair but

there are plenty of acceptable answers on evolution from people of faith. you know certainly francis collins and i know i talk about francis collins a lot but he wrote a big book something or other of beliefs. he talked about being a believer and also firmly believing in science and evolution. >> science and god go hand in hand. but let me ask you this. either of you jump in on this one. one of the things that was uncovered in the article is that he didn't -- scott walker did not complete his college education. neither did, i think, bill gates. >> good for him. most of it is a waste. >> 58% of americans do not have a bachelor degree. is this insulting? is this another moment for elitist dremelite ist democrats? >> howard dean did some damage.

i also think they care that the "new york times" decided to do a hit piece and not fact check. that story they did over the weekend on scott walker. i've gone toe to toe with these reporters. there's nothing worse than you know the reporter is going to write a negative story and you do everything to stop it. at least the blogosphere piped up and the times had to back talk about a story they did so wrong. >> we talked about evolution back in the day. my science teacher who i love has no idea of my beliefs on evolution. >> let's bring her out. rosemary nance is watching, we know. >> post traumatic stress defense taking center stage on the man accused of killing chris kyle. how is ptsd defined?

is it something that the defense can even prove? dr. keith shares his insights plus the latest on the investigation into a massive train derailment that forced hundreds of people from their homes and sent oil seeping into a town's water supply. you'll get the details. stay right here.

i've always loved exploring and looking for something better. that's the way i look at life. especially now that i live with a higher risk of stroke due to afib a type of irregular heartbeat, not caused by a heart valve problem. i was taking warfarin, but wondered if i kept digging could i come up with something better. my doctor told me about eliquis... for three important reasons. one, in a clinical trial, eliquis was proven to reduce the risk of stroke better than warfarin. two, eliquis had less major bleeding than warfarin. and three, unlike warfarin there's no routine blood testing. don't stop taking eliquis unless your doctor tells you to, as stopping increases your risk of having a stroke. eliquis can cause serious and in rare cases fatal bleeding. don't take eliquis if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. while taking eliquis, you may bruise more easily and it may take longer than usual for any bleeding to stop. seek immediate medical care for sudden signs of bleeding

like unusual bruising. eliquis may increase your bleeding risk if you take certain medicines. tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures. those three important reasons are why eliquis is a better find for me. ask your doctor today if eliquis is right for you. >> the prosecution in the trial of the man accused of killing american sniper chris kyle is expected to rap up the case today. routh confessed on video to shooting and killing kyle and his friend chad littlefield in 2013. all three men were visiting a shooting range to provide help for routh who was supposedly dealing with post traumatic stress disorder. prosecutors say he was a troubled drug user who knew

right from wrong. what is ptsd and do you think it applies here? >> all right. i'm a forensic psychiatrist so this is what i do with part of my time. i testify in cases not unlike this. so ptsd is a hallmark of ptsd number one you've been exposed to a horrific stress and that you have intrusive memories of that event and that you might do a lot to try to avoid those memories to try to suppress it but also it's the overreaction to simulate the environment, things that remind you of this event. you have this guy surrounded by firearms who could lose track of reality. the question is going to be in most states the question is did you know right from wrong? okay. if you don't know right from wrong, it could be that you qualify for an insanity plea. if you know right from wrong even knowing it were you unable to conform your behavior to the rights of the law? if this man believed the people

with him were enemy combat ants or that they had -- they were posturing in a way that signified that they were going to attack him, that could be the basis of an insanity defense but they would have to show records, showing that this has been a series of symptoms that have plagued him for years for which he sought treatment and that's usually still not enough because the truth is jurories are loathe to rubber stamp that for a client. it's very tough. >> especially in this case because he never left the base. he was deployed but never fighting on the front lines with the other soldiers so i'm not sure how he can say ptsd. >> we both have kids and when they misbehave in the classroom, you think they must have adhd or a.d.d. is this just bad behavior and we instantly go to ptst? >> it's all a case of what are the real symptoms and what's on record? there are people, after all, who

are so hobbles by post traumatic stress disorder and they're not in our shared reality for certain times. for those folks, you would hate to hold them responsible when it's a war related injury they cannot roll. is he that person? i haven't looked at the records. i don't know. is it conceivable? it's conceivable. >> they're bringing up doubts for some accounts that he had when he was with the marines, fighting out overseas and when he was a peace keep engineer haiti. he claimed that he interacted with children and dead bodies and he shot a child in iraq and there are people saying, no. all of that is untrup. that's factually incorrect and he was trying to game the system in order to receive more benefits. >> and that would go much more along with his character disorder which might go along with the drug use and him trying to game this system the judicial system. >> there's a big difference

because ptsd doesn't mean -- you know, if you have a mental illness, certainly that doesn't presuppose that you're instain. -- inscene. >> you can be depressed, even psychotic and know the right from wrong. the vast majority of people with those conditions do. there's a subset who will commit crimes while under the influence of those symptoms who can do complex things but still doing them for delusional reasons. >> does it say anything -- you said that he could be making up things that he did in his past sort of the brian williams disease. does that speak to -- does that speak to the fact that he's not insane? because he's making calculated lies based on his past? >> it wouldn't do anything to support his position if in the past he has strategized because that would erode people's sense. here's a helpless guy who is all generally good inside but he's

commandeered by symptoms. you can't be commandeered by symptoms and be trying to game the system. >> do you think the defense then shows the wrong plea? >> what else would you plea? >> not ptsd. maybe insanity. >> they have three choices. either capital murder, not guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity. >> they picked the third and we'll see whether the man is acquitted. >> well the storm has been coating much of the south and the east coast, just stopped snowing here in new york. snow and ice since yesterday and slowly moving off shore so that's good news but guess what? what is behind it? another blast of arctic air. the latest forecast coming up and having trouble reading whether your date is interested in being more than friends? what science is now saying about the mixed signals that men and women send each other.

...heartburn. did someone say burn? try alka seltzer reliefchews. they work just as fast and are proven to taste better than tums smoothies assorted fruit. mmm... amazing. yeah, i get that a lot. alka seltzer heartburn reliefchews. enjoy the relief. you're driving along, having a perfectly nice day, when out of nowhere a pick-up truck slams into your brand new car. one second it wasn't there and the next second... boom! you've had your first accident. now you have to make your first claim. so you talk to your insurance company and... boom! you're blindsided for a second time. they won't give you enough money to replace your brand new car. don't

those people know you're already shaken up? liberty mutual's new car replacement will pay for the entire value of your car plus depreciation. call and for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. switch to liberty mutual insurance and you could save up to $423 dollars. call liberty mutual for a free quote today at see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance. you're driving along, having a perfectly nice day, when out of nowhere a pick-up truck slams into your brand new car. one second it wasn't there and the next second... boom! you've had your

first accident. now you have to make your first claim. so you talk to your insurance company and... boom! you're blindsided for a second time. they won't give you enough money to replace your brand new car. don't those people know you're already shaken up? liberty mutual's new car replacement will pay for the entire value of your car plus depreciation. call and for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. switch to liberty mutual insurance and you could save up to $423 dollars. call liberty mutual for a free quote today at see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance. what's that thing? i moved our old security system out here to see if it could monitor the front yard. why don't you switch to xfinity home? i get live video monitoring and 24/7 professional monitoring that i can arm and disarm from anywhere.

hear ye! the awkward teenage one has arrived!!!! don't be old fashioned. xfinity customers add xfinity home for $29.95 a month for 12 months. plus for a limited time, get a free security camera call 1800 xfinity or visit comcast.com/xfinityhome. ... ... >> more "outnumbered" in a moment but first to jenna lee

with what's coming up in the second hour of "happening now." >> obama administration kicking off a summit on countering extreme violence in the white house. plus the dangerous inferno driving 1,000 people from their homes after a tanker train derailed and explodes, dumping oil into a west virginia river. what's getting in the way of the cleanup. we'll explain. dangerous cold and mounds of snow. another winter blast hits the northeast. is there any end in sight? 31 days until spring andrea. 31. >> i've got the countdown calendar. thanks. >> well, i may be "outnumbered" but it's my turn with this story. in the dating world wouldn't it be nice i think it would be nice if the potential partner would just tell you straight out how they feel about you instead of trying to figure out if they just wanted to be friends or they want more than that. now there's a new study and it suggests a pattern to single men

and women manage to go miss their signals almost completely. researchers found that men are more likely to perceive women's friendliness as sexual interest while women intend to think men's efforts to hook up as friendly. what is this about? >> the first part i buy. it's so true f. you're just nice to a guy, they think you're flirting with em them. excuse me. did you drop your pen? do you want to make out? the flip side is true. >> men with their egos right? >> it's so true. but the other side of the coin i don't necessarily -- i don't necessarily agree with. we've talked about this before. one study said women don't know when men are flirting with them. come on. when a guy asks you out, women know he's not just going to talk to you about -- >> you think the date is wrong. your date is furious. what do you think? >> i think mixed signals happen

in just marriage. sometimes i just want a massage. just a massage. my husband interprets it as something else. >> honey, honestly. >> do you know what is interesting? we were on reality tv together and that's an interesting experiment. i can look back on the early days, the first moment we met. isn't that funny? i can look back at what i thought we were interacting and then his confessional, what he thought was happening, what i thought was happening. >> he was flirting with you and you didn't know? or vice versa? >> i thought initially that he just wanted to be friendly with me. it was very cler when i watched the show later with all of his commentary that it purports the study. >> you're nodding your head. >> i think women can have male friends. i have male friends that i would never think anything of it but i have heard that men are not like that. that men can't have women friends. they're always --

>> it's very tough. >> there's always a motive. >> well i think that it's hard wired to some extent. do you think this is a hard wired phenomenal? >> i think a lot of stuff is hard wired but i think we were given a frontal cortex to overcome some of the hard wiring. we're not rubbing our privates all over each other all day long in public. >> but that would be interesting. >> frontal cortex isn't the problem. there's another frontal problem. >> for all you men watching, if we smile at you, if we pick up your pen, even if we just touch your arm, it doesn't mean that we're thinking anything more is going to happen. >> i know but i'm telling you, when i watch men interact with women, i see it. that man is being affection ate toward that woman. not just nice. >> that's not a fact. >> i agree. >> it is. it's affection. >> who cares? >> there we go. >> oh yeah.

sparks are flying. remember president obama campaign's presidential slogan how can i forget? turns out one person who wasn't a huge fan of it was the president himself. if not for the first lady, things might have been very different. just how important is that big campaign slogan? we will debate next. you get sick you can't breathe through your nose suddenly, you're a mouth breather. a mouth breather! well, put on a breathe right strip and shut your mouth. cold medicines open your nose over time, but add a breathe right strip and pow, it opens your nose up to 38% more. so you can breathe and do the one thing you want to do sleep. add breathe right to your cold medicine shut your mouth and sleep right. breathe right. and look for the calming scent of new breathe right lavender in the sleep

aisle.

>> thank you. >> thank you so much, really? thank you. who do i send the fruit basket to. that helped to get president obama elected in 2008. and he was not fond of it according to david a xelrod. the proposal goes back to the 2004 senate campaign. he thought it it was corny and michelle obama convinced him otherwise. she said we can do. this we can. >> just say no. look at jockey o.

behind every successful man is a successful woman. >> it is the most underappreciated aspect of politics. you are the only person that has no ul terior motive. you know them better than anybody else and you are not on the payroll and nothing but that person's interest at heart and they will obviously turn to you. and as time went on and women are educated as men, you know, that equality, and that partnership just gets stronger and stronger. >> i think it is fear. if you lose the election and your wife said to use the yes, we k. >> you think tipper's idea of wearing the barn jacket. >> yeah. >> people love it. fun. fun. >> and we'll stay right here for

outnumbered on the web. click the overtime tab and we'll be back on tv tomorrow afternoon on eastern. "happening now" starts right now. go get it. >> we begin with a fox news alert. the white house preparing an appeal after a federal judge blocks the president's executive orders on immigration. >> this is just one day before parts of the plan was supposed to it begin. that is all of the news on "happening now". (speaking foreign language) >> they were murdered for being christians. pope francis reacting. and one terrorist warns that they will conquer rome. plus inferno in a snow storm after an oil train derailment causes panic. what