you. breaking tonight, actor harrison ford at this moment after crashing a vintage plane on a california golf course. this is brand new video just in from tmz of the 72-year-old being treated for what is reported to be a serious gash on his head. new audio transmissions just released reveal ford reporting engine failure and requesting an emergency return to the santa monica airport. his son described him as battered but okay. we will go live to los angeles as we await a press conference from officials there on the extent we hope to hear of mr. ford's injuries as well as more on the crash itself.

standby for that. breaking tonight, hillary clinton decides to speak out on conducting all her private business on a private e-mail account while she was secretary of state. demands for accountability across the obama administration. welcome to "the kelly file" everybody. i'm megyn kelly. coming late last night in the form of tweet. the secretary writing "i want the public to see my e-mail. i asked state to release them. they said they will review them for release as soon as possible. but the state department only has the e-mails that mrs. clintons minions chose to turn over. so the legal questions remain, did she conceal or destroy any federal records? if so did she do so willingly? we'll look into those questions tonight her controversy is the

latest for an administration with festering doubts. a new poll finds 43% of voters think the president is honest. 54% say president obama is not honest. these numbers were nearly reversed just a few years ago. thomas fitten, president of judicial watch. his group has ten active freedom of information act lawsuits against the state department and just submitted requests for access to secretary clinton's newly revealed e-mails. tom, good to see you tonight. so you have been essentially going after documents of the state department for years now. and when they don't provide you with everything you file a lawsuit demanding it. and ultimately they may have to provide that to you. what if any have you gotten of hillary clinton's? >> none that we can tell. we filed over 160 requests for information with the state department. 20 lawsuits, ten are still

active. we can't find anything in any of the benghazi documents that we obtained. you know, those documents we got last year started up the select committee because of their explosive nature. and we noticed in those documents where are the hillary clinton e-mails. so we sued again. more directly at her office just to make sure and we still hadn't gotten anything. just recently the state department said, oh by the way, there may be more records we need to look at. they've been playing a shell game with us. in fact, there was one lawsuit that we dismissed because they said they looked at her office and found nothing. >> there was nothing in her office to look for. tom, i apologize. i need to standby. we're coming back to you. we need to finish this question. but we're just getting this ntsb news conference on the harrison ford plane crash. there were reports earlier that he was seriously injured. we want to listen in for a minute just to find out the status.

let's listen. >> part of our resources will maintain here through the night and assist with the other agencies involved. like i say, our resources arrived on scene and transported one 70-year-old male occupant to local hospital. and he is in -- >> this is the fire department chief as the lower third reflects we're awaiting the ntsb conference. let's listen. >> good afternoon. my name is patrick jones. the first most important thing is is that we have had injuries and we hope that the family and the pilot all recover in a rapid period of time. approximately 14:20 this afternoon there was a ryan aircraft, a vintage aircraft that was taking off from santa monica. the pilot reported a loss of engine power and was attempting

to return to the runway. it appears that he clipped the top of a tree and came to rest on the golf course. as the chief said there was only one person onboard who was treated by witnesses and transported for to the hospital. at this time the ntsb has started an investigation with the faa in attendance. and our goal is to tonight do some on-scene dockumentationdocumentation. we will ultimately recover the aircraft tomorrow morning to a local facility. and continue the investigation. and our process is kind of a slow process. and i'm sure that there's going to be some questions about what caused this and what's that and if we've solved it.

at this point in time it is the very beginning of an investigation. it takes us a long time because we want to get it right. so i will not answer any questions that have anything to do with causation at this point. >> the pilot we know you can't expose his name but you talk about a situation like this and a pilot surviving, was this pilot very lucky? >> most accidents there are about 2,000 accidents a year. the question was was this pilot lucky. absolutely a pilot and any time a human being is involved in an accident is a lucky individual. but having said that there are over 2,000 accidents a year nationwide that involve varying levels of injuries none to fatalities. the -- it is unusual actually

for pilots to lose their lives because aviation is a pretty safe operation. but accidents happen. any time somebody can get out of any type of accident whether it's a car or whatever. [ inaudible question ] >> it would appear the pilot did everything by the book -- [ inaudible ] >> i am not even going to go there. there's no way to -- you're talking where you're asking me to analyze something -- >> let me rephrase. based on your experience the plane lands right side up, it looks fairly in tact it was in a remote area, it would appear -- >> i would say any time that a pilot survives an accident or in any case that that was a good

thing. [ inaudible question ] >> all i know is what the fire department has told me. we have not been in touch with anybody at the hospital. we believe that he is going to survive at this point. >> you said it appears the pilot left santa monica airport, took off and then circled back around in an attempt to come back to the runway? >> i am actually responding to the information of the atc tapes that apparently have already been played because that's where i heard it from. the pilot reported a loss of engine power and was attempting to return. [ inaudible question ] >> next question.

[ inaudible question ] >> that requires speculation that i can't make at this point. >> could the result have been different for inexperienced -- >> 40,000 people die in automobile accidents every year on the highway. when there's an accident that somebody did you want die inoesn't die in. you don't get that question. i don't know at this point. flying an aircraft whether it's this aircraft or a helicopter or whatever, it all takes experience. this pilot is an experienced pilot. and i'll say that. [ inaudible question ] >> the question was this aircraft doesn't have a black box. no, it does not have a black box. this is an old vintage aircraft.

many aircraft do not have what you refer to as a black box nor are they required to have a black box. the problem is is that -- only been the last few decades that black boxes actually exist. so we can go back to the basics -- we are going to look at that but we are going to look at everything. weather, man, the machine. [ inaudible question ] >> a return to airport depends on what altitude you're at. and i don't know what altitude this pilot was at at the point in time that he chose to do that. so i have no way of knowing whether that was a good thing or a bad thing.

and if you're going to slam into a wall, maybe turning away is your only option. >> how difficult is it -- engine troubles for an area like this on a golf course? >> well i'm sure the pilot is glad that there was an airport here -- i mean that there was a golf course here. [ inaudible question ] no -- there are -- and i know that's a local -- this is a local issue. but it is -- this airport is a very important airport. and there's a lot of business that comes in and out of this airport. i don't know when the last accident was here but i don't think it is -- flying is safe if

it's done right. >> do you know how long your investigation will take? i know you said weeks or -- can you give us an estimate? >> the investigation normally takes a couple of months. and normally a final report we try to get done within a year. do not know. he asked where the plane was headed. do not know. i will say this one more time, any time a human being is involved in an accident whether it's a car, jet, airplane or otherwise and survives is a good day. [ inaudible question ] i do not have that information. >> do we know where the plane was headed? >> do not know where the plane was headed. >> can you talk about how much time elapsed between takeoff and issue reported? >> that is data that we will capture, but at this point in

time i do not know. >> maybe you said this before and i wasn't listening did the plane reach complete takeoff or just takeoff and call shortly after takeoff about a problem? >> the question was had he just taken off. my understanding is and all i know is that i heard the atc recording on the news. and the pilot reported that he had an engine failure and was returning to the airport. it's not immediate at this point. >> from the distance -- how high -- what do you think the altitude was? >> i cannot will not speculate on that. >> how far is he from the landing when the crash occurred? how far is that from the active landing trip? >> well the airport is right over there. it's a hundred yards or 200 300

yards somewhere in that. >> harrison ford in a plane crash in a plane that he was piloting forced to land on the eighth hole of a golf course in los angeles after he reportedly lost power in the plane's engine. and the amazing headline there is that he is expected to be okay. his son tweeting out, dad is battered but okay. trace gallagher's been following the story this evening. he's got a report from our west coast newsroom. trace. >> well the ntsb was asked, megyn, if this was the sign of a good pilot. they wouldn't really answer the question but i can tell you all indications are harrison ford is a heck of a pilot because after takeoff from the airport where he keeps his plane he was no more than a mile into his flight when he had to turn around because of engine failure. you heard ntsb mention the conversation with the air traffic control. i'm going to play this right now. listen. >> 178, engine failure immediate

return. >> 178 runway 21 clear to land. >> ryan 178 runway three clear to land. >> unit three did you see that was was short of the runway -- >> now, for pilots who fly out of santa monica it's standard to use the golf course as an emergency go-to. it's literally right across the street plus you have houses on both sides of the golf course. not only did he set it down, he was able to nearly thread the needle between some trees. witnesses say he did glance off one tree and the landing gear kind of caught the grass and slammed the nose into the ground. harrison was seated in the back of the airplane and helped by two doctors who just happened to be playing golf rushed to ucla medical center where he's now in fair condition, megyn. he's been flying airplanes since the 1960s. >> trace thank you. back to you as the news warrants. in the meantime we want to get back to tom fitton who is president of judicial watch on

the clinton controversy. tom, apologies for the interruption. we wanted to get the breaking news in. you've been trying to get these documents from the state department over a number of matters including benghazi. when you ask for documents you don't recall ever getting anything back with the hillary clinton e-mail response or header on it? >> that's right. in fact, it was notable. so notable that we filed an additional lawsuit to make sure they had no out not to give us the material. and we dismissed another lawsuit against the state department after they told us they searched her office and they didn't find anything. you know, they had an obligation to tell us they're not only lying to us, they're messing with the courts. and this is a seven-year cover-up. the administration knew this from the beginning. as soon as she began using this e-mail account. and it's not a private e-mail account. it's a government account that was disguised and hidden from the american people. so the idea her lawyers are going and checking these e-mails, they shouldn't be allowed access to it.

the state department or the justice department should go in and seize this account and make sure there's no classified material that's been mishandled or lost and no other records subject to the federal records laws have been mishandled. i tell you there's a criminal violation potentially here. >> so to take a step back you're getting these responses to the freedom of information act requests, because those are our documents and you're looking at the responses and thinking nothing? not one correspondence that was printed out from her computer? is that how you had to figure it out? if i print something off my computer you're going to see megyn kelly at the top. >> exactly. you normally see that with top officials. we receive documents from eric holder. you know it's the agency's head. they're not going to give the e-mail address but you know whose it is. this was not apparent in any documents we received and they

never told us they weren't searching her e-mail accounts. the law requires those e-mail accounts be searched. and her concealing those records as i'm sure your other guests will note, this is something that a prosecutor ought to be looking into. >> uh-huh. >> and classified information on what's necessarily in use in these accounts. and there's severe penalties. people can go to jail for mishandling classified information. this is as i said a seven-year cover-up. and there are men in jail right now for doing less than what i think mrs.early is frankly admitted to doing which is setting up on purpose a secret account that no one could look at even though it was for government business. >> you teed up my next guest perfectly, tom. thanks for being here. so how bad is this legally? my next guest says what hillary clinton did was illegal and it's been illegal for 20 years. he served as top white house legal adviser during the george w. bush administration he's also former deputy assistant attorney general of the justice

department's civil division. shannon, good to see you. do you believe this is illegal? >> yeah it's certainly a violation of federal records laws. which require preservation of these sorts of records. for 20 years since the clinton administration it's been clear that if you have external e-mails on external e-mail systems that on which you conduct official business you've got to preserve those records as official records. >> what do you make of her statement, i want the public to see my e-mail. i asked state to release them. they said they will review them for release as soon as possible. >> well it's awfully convenient. she's picked the 50,000 pages that she has decided can be released. and we don't have a clue what else there is on those e-mail servers. there could be twice three times that.

i don't know, megyn. it's not up to hillary clinton to make that sort of decision. it's up to federal records officials. >> but what about those who say lots of officials have private e-mail accounts, have and had including secretary state colin powell. >> i mean two wrongs don't make a right here. and i'm not 100% certain what the circumstances of colin powell's records are but i'm not here to defend him either. it was well-known when colin powell was secretary of state that you preserved private e-mails that had official records. but after he was secretary of state there was an even more emphatic -- >> what to the argument she preserves them because they're all presumably sitting on her

server sitting in her house in chappaqua, new york. >> presumably is a pretty loaded word there. do we know that? why is it tom fitton who you heard from, who is the bane of my existence when i was a doj lawyer -- >> right, he hated you too. >> right. why is it that tom fitton has been making requests and other public advocates have been making requests too and none of those records have been searched? they might be preserved. i mean, i'm willing to actually, you know indulge that suggestion right now. but they were concealed during her tenure in office. they weren't subject to any searches during her tenure in office. the entire purpose of this system was to take them offline and outside of the record searches that would be required when congress asked for them or when foir requests for them. >> that's what happened during

these lawsuits. and now the state department says they're not going back to look to see if whether they have documents responsive for the foir requests et cetera that have come in prior to right now. is that okay? >> well, the answer to that is we'll see because there are a lot of judges that may be asked to revisit these issues. and maybe they won't have to search those records. but there are going to be a lot of judges who felt like they were misled. what matters here is what did the department of state say in affidavits to the court about the scopes of their searches. >> that's right. and if they misrepresented this. >> possibility of perjury here. >> if they misrepresented this, marie harf is wrong and they will be going back through those documents, not just 55000 but more. shannen, good to see you. >> good to see you, megyn. secretary clinton di e did all of this work on the home computer, it had to handle some of america's top secrets right? who set it up and what kind of clearance did they have?

james rosen next along with a man who was just with the clintons last night. and the doj has kpleeltly cleared officer darren wilson of any wrongdoing in the death of michael brown.

back now to our top story and breaking news on what we just discovered in a "the kelly file" investigation into the private e-mail server that hillary clinton relied on as secretary of state. our chief washington correspondent james rosen was digging into that when a hacker came forward with some breaking news. james. >> megyn, good evening. aides to former secretary of state clinton maintain she only used one private e-mail address during her time as secretary of state. that address has been identified as hdr22@clintonemail.com. the domain has been in turn been traced to a private server she had set up in her hometown of chappaqua, new york.

with that server registered in the name of a former aide of the clinton white house. but was that the only private e-mail address that clinton used? fox news obtained data from a prominent hacker who employed a publicly available tool called the harvester to search a variety of tools to search google, bing linked inand twitter to look for references stored on those platforms to the domain name clintonemail.com. as this screen grab shows mrs. clinton established multiple e-mail addresses for her private use and possibly for the use of her aides carrying that domain name. other addresses are similar to the hdr22 address. they include hdr@clintonemail.com. hdr 19 20, 21. also unearthed were addresses featuring a slightly varied structure h.clintonemail.com.

and most interesting mo underscore suit. republican congressman trey gowdy investigating the benghazi terror attacks has disclosed despite what clinton aides have said only using one e-mail address, his panel is already in possession of two addresses clinton used during her time as america's top diplomat. the data unearthed by the harvester shows there may well be others. it's not known if clinton herself used any or all of these addresses, whether one or more of her aides might have used them. we've reached out to the clinton campaign -- or the clinton team for comment and they did not spojd megyn. >> james rosen thank you, sir. joining me with more lanny davis who attended the clintons gala last night with president clinton and hillary clinton. he's the former special council for president clinton. lanny, good to see you. >> hi megyn. >> first, i know you don't think she did anything wrong here. but i want to ask you whether

you know if she did preserve all of the documents that she created and received during her tenure as secretary of state via e-mail? >> well she says she preserved -- excuse my voice megyn, it will be up to the state department and anybody else to confirm she's telling the truth. >> did she say that? i didn't hear her say that in her tweets. >> yes. >> you're telling us she says she did not delete any official documents. >> all preserved. and if deleted you know they can be found. secondly it is a fact that she did nothing illegal. the law actually changed in 2014. and the preservation of those records nothing -- >> that's not true. let me stop you there. that's not true. i've been looking at this, you're a lawyer and so am i, but i've been looking at this for two days and my information is that the law was very clear as of 1995 the national archives and records administration adopted regulations which requires the preservation of official e-mails created on

nonofficial accounts. and then in 2009 new regulations made that even more clear providing that any e-mails created on private e-mail accounts had to be preserved. that was very clear as of 1995, reiterated in 2009. and then just got even more stringent in 2013. but she was subject to that regulation. >> correct. and your first question i answered definitively. they were preserved. now, your speculation maybe not, we'll see. >> but you're also prohibited from concealing. from concealing. >> so my second point about concealing is she sent thousands of e-mails to thousands of people using these e-mail addresses. everybody got them. on the records -- >> how does that suggest to the world that she doesn't -- how does that telegraph to the world that that's everything she has? i mean tom fitton is supposed to know. he doesn't get e-mails from her. he's supposed to know she has

this account because she e-mailed somebody in the government? >> megyn, thousands of people getting an e-mail address is not concealment. that's my statement to you -- >> that's not the standard. >> that's not your standard. >> what about the tens of thousands of documents that she had on her own private server all that time that all these people didn't know about. that's concealment. >> every single person who received her e-mail, thousands, knew that she had this e-mail address. >> it's not concealment of the e-mail address. it's concealment of the documents, the public records that you are creating. >> megyn i'm going to let the american people decide whether this discussion where i say thousands of people knew and you say that's concealment let them decide -- >> no, just focus on my last point. it's not concealment. you're not guilty if you conceal the fact you have an e-mail address from which you correspond. you're potentially guilty if you conceal public records, e-mails that you're creating or receiving. >> potentially. >> your defense that, well some of the ones were public does not

exonerate her. >> potentially is not a fact, it is a theory. and let me at least get to my third point without interruption. >> go for it. >> the third point is she has committed to turning over all the e-mails, not just the 55,000 pages today. and you forgot to mention that jeb bush who i revere, his brother and i are friends and i admire jeb bush, had 3 million e-mails while he was governor using a private e-mail account. and his own server. and you're not interviewing a republican asking why? >> there may be an issue for jeb bush too. i'm not -- there may be an issue for jeb bush too, but tonight i have you. >> double standard. >> that's a classic clinton tactic is don't look at me look at this other person. let's stay on hillary for one minute. >> no you shouldn't be doing double standard, megyn. that's all i'm saying. >> i'm going to get cut off by the computer because of the harrison ford presser. in june of 2011 clinton issued a directive ordering everyone in

her staff to avoid from conducting personal e-mail accounts. lanny, in ten seconds why didn't she comply herself? >> in ten

well seems the case is not closed in the shooting death of michael brown at the hands of officer darren wilson in ferguson, missouri. despite a doj report yesterday that cleared officer wilson of any wrongdoing, brown's family plans on taking this case to the civil level and likely naming officer wilson as one of the defendants. joining us now darrell parks and chuck canterbury. in light of what the doj came out with yesterday and i went through it with the viewers on the air the evidence does not establish for wilson to perceive

brown is a threat, no credible evidence to believe wilson acting in self-defense. brown did not sustain gunshot wounds to his back. multiple credible witnesses corroborate virtually every material aspect of wilson's account and are consistent with physical evidence. in light of all that, how can you continue a legal case against officer wilson? >> well megyn, i have to respectfully disagree with your statement how the facts will be interpreted in this case. obviously we have a different standard in a civil case than they would have in a criminal case. we just have a difference of opinion. >> you know, it doesn't -- i understand that you have a belief in your head. but when you go into court, you need evidence. you need actual evidence. and what eric holder's doj which didn't seem like they were exactly against your side when they went into this, what they concluded is the number one thing that got this started although there are some

individuals who stated brown held his hands up in a sign of surrender their accounts do not support a prosecution. but he goes onto say as details throughout the report some of those accounts are inaccurate, inconsistent with the physical and forensic evidence and inconsistent with the witness's own prior statements and so on. he is trying to say you will not prevail. the standard is too high even in a civil matter, is it not, for you to overcome? >> well as you know in a civil matter it is a lesser standard. >> it is. >> we believe there's evidence here that clearly shows in the situation that the officer found himself in he does not have to take the child's life. now we believe the facts that build up to the situation where it was the kill shot had other possibilities to use and failed to do. >> do you think this was motivated by race? do you think race was played at all by officer wilson?

>> i'm not making it a race issue. i believe there are facts that will support our theory in a court of law. >> that's interesting you're not making it a race issue and yet the ferguson police department, chuck, yesterday was found to have serious race issues. that's where the doj investigation eventually went and very while it exonerated officer wilson it did nothing of the kind for the ferguson p.d. and some saying it should be disbanded. should it? >> megyn i've lost the feed. i can't hear you. i think that's a decision for the local politicians to make. what we believe at this time is that the justice department completed their investigation, officer wilson gave a clear and concise statement from the start. he was consistent all the way through. and the justice department -- justice department found him to be honest and credible. so what happens with that police department will take months and years to decide. but at this point officer wilson

was consistent in his story and the justice department and the physical evidence proved that. >> what did you make of the fact, chuck that while eric holder's doj offered many exculpatory statements as i just read about officer darren wilson, eric holder brushed right by it in his public remarks and barely mentioned officer wilson and certainly offered no apology or thoughts for him and the hell he's been through after doj just found there is no evidence to prove the man violated the law in any way. >> megyn i believe that's just consistent with prosecutors. he rendered his decision he made the statement. he had already prejudged this case from the start. and when the facts didn't play out to his prejudgment he didn't have any choice but to blow right by it. but the bottom line is the justice department did a fair, impartial investigation and officer wilson was exonerated by the evidence and by the testimony that he gave right

from the start. >> daryl, i think it's interesting to hear you say you now no longer believe race played any issue in this because that's what got this whole thing started. that white cops were executing young, unarmed black men and michael brown was thought to be just yet another in a line of victims that were taken down by what some were saying were racist cops. do you now state for the record that you have no evidence and do not believe that officer wilson is one of those alleged racist cops? >> first i disagree with your statement. let me say this. it's rather clear what the officer said to michael brown when he saw dorian and michael walking on the street, he told them to get the [ bleep ] off the street. we believe it's prohibited and falls within the pattern of practices of the ferguson police department that is a problem. >> are you suggesting that that shows his racism?

>> well it shows they have a pattern in practice of targeting young men who happen to be walking. and obviously that's one of the findings that came out in the doj report. >> you have an uphill battle, sir. with all due respect you're going to have an uphill battle with that lawsuit. we'll continue to follow it and thanks for coming on, both of you. we have more news breaking in the harrison ford plane crash. we'll have t t t t t t

big news today from the

executive who set out to change the workplace for women. facebook's c.o.o., sheryl sandberg, won praise across the country when she wrote a book. and today sandberg is announcing a new initiative called lean in together. this one's for the guys. earlier i spoke with sheryl sandberg, the c.o.o. of facebook and founder of leanin.org. the premise of this next phase is that equality between men and women, you know you sold it to women and tried to get them to believe they could achieve it and how to. and this is directed at men saying equality of women in the workplace and at home is good for you too. explain that. >> we know that the new imf report came out if we got women into the work force at the same level of men, our gdp would grow by 5%. we haven't seen that kind of growth for a long time. from an individual man's perspective, if you work better

with half the population you're going to outperform your peers so it's good for your careers. on the home front couples that share responsibility 50/50 are happier, lower divorce, more sex. chore play is real. >> i love that. >> chore play is real. don't buy flowers. do laundry. >> i think that's fantastic. i mean, who wouldn't push for me equality if they know they're going to have a happier wife, healthier children and more action? >> absolutely. across the board. >> we've been selling it wrong in the past. that's all you need to know, guys, do some laundry. that just makes sense because if you are working all day -- because you have studies you've researched the studies and they show while both men and women are working in so many households, the household duties are still overwhelmingly bourn by women. and you know what that leads to? resentment. and the feeling when you go to bed at night that you don't want to do one more thing before you go to sleep. >> that's exactly right. 70% of mothers work. and even in households with two working parents women do 30% to

40% more house work and child care. they have two or three jobs their husbands have one. for fathers children at any income level no matter how active a mother is, when fathers are more active, their children are healthier, happier and do better in school and at work. and it's not what you say. it's what you do. there's a new study out by age 14 girls with fathers who do household chores have broader career aspirations in daughters who don't see their fathers doing anything in the home. so any amount of, darling, you can do anything, is not as good as washing a dish. >> you talk about raising children in a home and raising the next gender equality generation. and you talk about chores in the household and how we're sending messages, sometimes the wrong ones to our kids right now. what? >> that's right. there is a toddler wage gap in this country. toddlers. in our homes boys do fewer chores than girls and get paid more. and for any woman who's in the work force that feels pretty

familiar. our sons take out the trash. doesn't take that long to take out the trash. daughters set the table. takes longer. >> i never liked taking out the trash. i don't know if you're right on this thing. i prefer to set the table. inside, don't have to deal with the stinky garbage. >> that was your choice but i bet you didn't like doing more chores -- >> depends on your family. joni ernst had to castrate pigs for her allowance. >> i'm joni ernst. i grew up castrating hogs on a farm. when i get to washington i'll know how to cut pork. >> you say when you go to a restaurant make your daughter order her own meal. even with my own kids, my oldest child who's a boy we're working on shaking hands with people, shake hands and look in the eye. my daughter 19 months younger we have not been doing that as much. i read this and i said why not? >> most parents by junior high

have higher leadership aspirations for their sons than their daughter and don't even realize it. leadership is a skill. and care giving is a skill. we need to teach our daughters to lead, to look in the eye, to shake hands. and we need to tell our sons one of our tips we have tips as part of this campaign that lean in together.org one of our tips is don't tell your son to man up. men, strong men, a partnership with the nba can play the center of a court and they can play sensitive too. we've got lebron james with a sign all-star dad. >> that's awesome. good for you, sheryl. it's been fun to watch and only growing bigger and better. >> thank you for having me. >> i also spoke with sheryl about bare arms at work kim kardashian and signing e-mails xoxo. plus, breaking news live right now on the delta plane that slid off the runway at laguardia and nearly ended up in the ocean. back with that and more on man (sternly): where do you think you're going? mr. mucus: to work, with you.

it's taco tuesday. man: you're not coming. i took mucinex to help get rid of my mucusy congestion. i'm go od all day. [announcer:] mucinex keeps working. not 4, not 6 but 12 hours. let's end this

breaking news right now, at new york's laguardia airport where earlier today a plane skidded off the runway and came dangerously close to going into the water. trace gallagher's following the breaking story. trace. >> it's an md-88 megyn. that gives you great perspective. go back to those live pictures of just how close this airplane was from actually going into the water. it's up, above and over that fence 50 or 60 feet it's in the water and that changes everything that happened today. this was flight 1086 from atlanta. it came in and one of the big questions all day is why it came in and landed on a runway with the wind instead of normally flying against the wind, which airplanes do. we learn today in fact it came in on runway 13 which has an instrument landing system. and because of the snow and

because of the low cloud cov it needed that to land. it was a 7,000 foot runway, about 4,500 feet down the runway the plane somehow skidded to the left. it's unclear exactly why. and ended up where you see it right there. the emergency chutes did not deploy, so the passengers reminiscent of the miracle on the hudson were climbing out on the wing and then climbing down. at last check there were 24 people injured and three of them were serious. the ntsb was on the scene all day. faa as well. they have not determined exactly what happened. there was snow on the runway. but the two planes ahead of this plane reported that the braking conditions were good. remember, braking is half the deal. and then you have those antithrust engines that stop the plane and slow it down. so at this point very unclear exactly why it skidded left and went off right there. but boy, as this frame is taking gives you a very good

idea of how close it was. >> trace, thank you. we'll be backckckckckck

so santa monica city manager is now confirming that harrison ford had a cut forehead and may have also broken his leg which apparently he also did when filming the latest "star wars." we don't know the same leg or what the story is. you say bad luck but really this man is very lucky to be alive tonight given what happened to him. and if only he had his wooki co-pilot this might not have happened at

>> it is friday march 6th. a crash landing. harrison ford's plane plunges into a golf course. information about his condition and what went wrong. >> near disaster a plane packed with so many people flies off the runway feet from the icy river. >> aircraft off the runway. >> now passengers on board are reliving this terrifying moment. >> relentless no trapping drivers for hours. they dig out a new problem on the