helped him here. >> electorate is very divided. p >> thanks, everybody. thanks for joining us. i'll see you tomorrow on the fox business network. on the "buzz beater," the "new york times" bomb shell on hillary clinton even liberal commentators whipping the up declared democratic candidate. >> if it's true that she they ever used a state department e-mail address, we have something that at first read has no rational explanation to it. >> just seems a dumb move on hillary clinton's part because surely she knew this would come out at some point this time. >> why has this story struck such a nerve? is she as inasmuch political and

legal trouble as news organizations are saying and is the press building a narrative that the former first lady doesn't play by the rules? "time" calls him the most interesting man in politics, but rand paul gets plenty of bad press, as well. >> i get mad sometimes and i try to be as even keeled as i can, but sometimes like everybody else, there are interviews that i would have done differently. >> a conversation about whether he's still liberal provocative and why the media keep trying to link him to his father. bd at media go nuclear over bibi netanyahu bibi netanyahu bibi netanyahu's speech. plus the 50th anniversary of the bloody march on selma. how vital was the media's role then and how is coverage today. i'm howard kurtz and this is "#mediabuzz".

from the moment the "new york times" broke the news that hillary clinton did her state department business from private e-mail account media coverage has exploded, filled with questions and criticism including the network newscasts. >> tonight she is under fire for using only her private e-mail account in that very public role as secretary of state. >> the e-mails reveal the height of carelessness only the arrogant few can reach. a leader using private e-mail protects herself, but not her country. >> a few liberal pundits played defense noting the disclosure of the failure stems from requests from the house committee investigating the attack on the consulate in libya. >> how do we turn back a benghazi witch hunt part two? i mean this plays right into the clinton haters hands. >> house committee has now

subpoenaed those e-mails which clinton says she wants released. joining us now, ed henry, mercedes schlapp, and michael tomasky. ed you and others reported pressing white house about the e-mails all week. let's take a look. >> when did you first learn hillary clinton used an e-mail system outside the u.s. government for official business while she was secretary of state? >> the same time everybody else learned it through news reports. >> so do you see white house distancing going on? >> somewhat. it's interesting because earlier in the week they were sort of defending her by saying they can't necessarily see anything wrong here. >> sort of. >> sort of. and we can get into that. but i find it interesting the president's response assay saying

i learned about it from news reports. but i think the bottom line question, major garrett of cbs asked a very good question this week of josh earnest which is were there two sets of rule, one for the clintons and one for everyone else. and that's why i think the media coverage has been intense because other cabinet secretaries, sure, they have personal e-mail account, but they have official e-mail accounts, as well. she had personal only that she used for four years. no one in the white house who e-maileded with the secretary ever said hey, wait a second, the rest of us -- >> that's good. media left, right and center are treating this as a big scandal. does this deserve the magnitude of coverage it's getting? >> it started off as the inside the belt way story with the "new york times" and "washington post." and even for us working at the white house, you knew better than to use personal e-mails to conduct government business. with that being said the story has legs. why? because the media is hungry for answers. they want to know were the e-mails deleted.

why did she violate what is said about making sure you you don't use personal e-mail for conducting government business? so again i think that this can definitely keep exploding especially if hillary clinton continues to keep her head under the pillow and decide not to respond to this. >> unanswered questions always drive any journalistic story. you wrote a piece raising questions about the original new york times story. >> it was sloppy. it left out key dates and facts about what exact rules and regulations and laws she might have potentially been in violation of. and i think the "times" kind of acknowledged that because they did a day two story that clarified all those points after i and other people i think politico also wrote an article that questioned that first -- >> but there is no dispute when hillary took office in 2009, you were supposed to preserve all your e-mail records.

but who knows because it's all on the private home server. >> that's correct. there was a 2009 it turns out national archives records administration rule that did call for preserving. so that's the question. and then i think another fair question is whether any classified information was put out over a private e-mail account and what implications that might have. >> and there are two different e-mail systems in the white house. and josh earnest said he didn't know how much e-mail she use, whether she had an official account on that classified. but even on the open system was she using this private account. and not just benghazi syria policy talking about the russian reset. important information that putting aside any possible scandal, you about auyou because i agree don't rush to judgment, but she kept this to herself for over four years. >> and we may never know the facts. she's in complete control of

this server. and separate rules. >> and there haven't been a lot of answers. but you say in the same "daily beast" story that the "times" has never loved the chinlintons. so are you saying that the newsroom of the "new york times" often accused of being unfair to republicans is biased? >> there is not some conspiracy. not like all the former executive editors are on the phone with the current executive editor and cooking something up. but just play to go a pattern that does exist. i'm not telling you why but it has i think reasonably been documented to most people's satisfaction that that original white water oig story in 1992 didn't hold up. >> nonetheless hillary clinton gave the "new york times" and everyone else a lot of fodder here also because i think we should note the fact that regardless of the fact that rules were clarified after she left office and all of that, she

helped push out one of her ambassadors, u.s. ambassador to kenya, various not just e-mail, but in part because he was using personal e-mail for official business. >> if the "times" story was sloppy and a little bit -- let's just say not giving hillary clinton the benefit of the daughter why did all the network newscasts cover this three straight nights, not just fox. >> because hillary clinton is stone walling the media. she is not giving answers. and that's why they're pushing forward. margaret sullivan acknowledged a story that you had written and basically saying that they were a bit sloppy in not the providing the regulations and clarifying why she might have possibly broken the rules. >> as much coverage as this has gotten, very interesting set of comments on msnbc's morning joe

about what if it wasn't hillary clinton. let's take a look. >> can you imagine if this was dick cheney and he had a server in mcclain, virginia? i'd go crazy. i'd be completely off the hook. and i'm trying to be because i do think sometimes there is a little bit of bias that sneaks in to this. but this is wrong. >> a little bit of bias? she's being honest there and i credit her for saying that that directly. i covered the bush white house. if at the height of the bush energy task force scandal where there wasn't a lot of transparency, we should point that out, if we had learned during that that there was this other e-mail account, dick cheney at oil man.com and he was communicating with oil executives about energy policy, you know, every media outlet would be going crazy and rightly

so. >> but on that point, everyone's been replaying this clip of hillary clinton talking about secrecy at the bush white house. and there is hypocrisy there as well. >> and karl rove and whether or not there were separate rnc the accounts as i remember, and gw bush accounts that were alledgedly used for political fundraising rightly so to keep it separate from official but there were allegations never fully proven that bush officials were using the other accounts to do official business. so that has been there before in fairness to hillary. >> you brought up whitewater. and i think a lot of people forgotten or barely even knew when hillary clinton was first lady, there were so many questions swirling around her that she once held a press conference called the pink press conference because she wore a pink outfit and answered questions for 70 minutes about whitewater, the land deal in arkansas that the clintons lost money on, about travelgate, but missing records, about cattle

futures. do you think the press, forget the "new york times," the press from those days still has a narrative that she is enamored with secrecy and not playing by the usual rules? >> yes. and to some extent, justified. i don't think it's justified to the complete extent because a lot of those things didn't turn out to be much. but i think it is justified for some september. and i do -- i wrote also friday in a follow-up piece that her judgment on these smell test things just apt right. p. >> and we were talking about those people around her those aides advising her telling her it's okay to have a private e-mail. >> you used the word stonewall. she issued just one tweet. and bloomberg quoting sources saying she's not giving any interviews and that the needed i can't will getmedia will get bored and you've on. >> i don't think so.

there are so many questions. >> and it's not just the e-mail. position about think about the clinton found indication. these were ethics rules about foreign governments complaint give can't give money to clinton foundation. bill clinton said get it all automaticout there. and it wasn't all out there. >> back to back nature of the story harmful. there was one news o organization that managed to throw a question at her. tmz. take a look. >> how are you do somethingingdoing? was that a generalization gap or can it be corrected? any chance of correcting it? have a great day. >> nice try there at reagan national airport, but

generalization got a lamo question. immediate to take a break. sent me a tweet, what do you think about the media's handling of the hillary story. and you can always e-mail us. ahead i sit down with rand paul on his battles with the media as he gears up for a presidential run. but when we come back, the coverage around netanyahu and barack obama over the prime minister's speech.

the garden is the story of our lives... told and retold. it's as old as our time on earth. and as new as tomorrow. you can have a yard. or slightly less. gardening isn't about where we choose to live. it's about how we choose to live. miracle-gro. life starts here. my house... it's a full day for me, and i love it. but when i started having back pain my sister had to come help. i don't like asking for help. i took tylenol but i had to take six pills to get through the day. so my daughter brought over some aleve. it's just two pills, all day! and now, i'm back! aleve. two pills. all day strong, all day long.

and now introducing aleve pm for a better am. with the help of comfort keepers, i'm keeping my mom healthy! i'm keeping dad on schedule. i'm keeping my mom happy! comfort keepers in-home professional caregivers can provide meal planning and preparation, health and wellness services and personal care services through custom care plans that can change as needs change, so your aging loved ones can stay happy and healthy in their own home. ♪

it was covered like a state of the union address whenanyahu challenged president obama's negotiations

with iran. >> we've been told that no deal is better than a bad deal. well, this is a bad deal. it's a very bad deal. >> we begin with israeli prime minister bibi netanyahu and his attempt to tee rail obama's foreign policy. >> obama is so desperate for this dealrail obama's foreign policy. >> obama is so desperate for this deal, he's willing to give israel up. let's face it. if israel disappeared from the face of the earth tomorrow, obama would not shed a tear. >> this is not happening in a vacuum and i do think it's time to ask the question is this white house anti-semitic. >> what was it like dealing with the white house that was aggressively pushing back against the speech day after day and did it make it a bigger story? >> sure. and there was a lot of noise on all sides about that and as a reporter, i won't get in the middle of that. but what i will say is not enough attention by the media at

large was focused on the actual deal that is emerging. the substance is ultimately what matters. and from my reporting behind the scenes, this president and prime minister actually have a better relationship than we see publicly and prime minister netanyahu acknowledged that at the top of his speech that they are on the phone all the time and beyond the support of iron dome -- >> all the coverage you position that we covered more the political -- >> because it was a fight. and it was legitimate to cover it. speaker boehner went around the white house. there was politics there. no doubt about it. that was all worth covering. >> at the heart of this is what we'll do with iran. >> right. and there is a dispute there. and i'm not trying to sweep under the carpet that there is bad blood between the white house and the prime minister, no doubt about it. but we should be focusing more on are we about to give the store away here and iran getting closer to getting nuclear weapons. and the white house pushes back hard and says they will get a good deal. we'll see obviously.

>> are some pundits going too far in questioning whether president obama cares about israel or whether the white house is biased against jews? >> i think that's one step too far. p but in it general, i think that the coverage of this was so polarized because the response to it among the politicians was so polarized. i was shocked to hear some of the democrats have some of the reactions that they had. dianne feinstein most notably would said exceptionally that netanyahu wants war. >> you're saying maybe they were taking their cuethat netanyahu wants war. >> you're saying maybe they were taking their cue from the overheated rhetoric? >> but i think people do kind of take cues, psychological cues there politicians sometimes divisive. and with the cable nets divided. >> well, tripflip the script. if nancy pelosi had invited

aerial sha reason your side would be going about as will tick. >> it would be difficult for the president again not to be included in the process of inviting the prime minister to come in. so again i think the media actually enjoyed telling the story of the food fight that was happening in congress at the time. and following the triangle between speaker boehner, president netanyahu and president obama. >> was the news coverage fair in airing all sides? >> i think they did a fair job at basically giving the net netanyahu speech, the pelosi comments. and president obama gave his remarks right after.pelosi comments. and president obama gave his remarks right after. so i think they gave both sides of the story. >> and the white house originally said the president has this other important teleconference going on about ukraine the same hour.

could be destructive to the relationship and there is nothing to see here. and then after the speech and they realize netanyahu had really scored points in terms of-of in -- in the sense that he ripped up the poe odile. and the president said after saying he's not paying attention really, nothing new here, and then he came outodile. and the president said after saying he's not paying attention really, nothing new here, and then he came out and point by point had a counter point. >> all right. thanks very much for joining us this sunday. ahead, i ask rand paul about that incident where he got ticked off and tried to shush a cnbc anchor. but up next, with barack obama and george w. bush marking the 50th anniversary of the march on selma how has the media's coverage of civil rights changed since then.

president obama along with george w. bush was in selma yesterday for the 50th anniversary of the bloody sunday march that violent turning point in which journalists played such a critical role. >> americans who crossed this bridge, they were not physically imposing. but they gave courage to millions. >> commemoration happened in the same week that the justice department decided not to bring civil rights charges against darren wilson in the killing of michael brown but issued a scathing report about racial prejudice in the ferguson police department. so how has the coverage evolved since 1965? joining us now from seattle crystal wright and in new york, julie roginsky. crystal, it was journalists covering selma and other civil rights battles of that cera who bricked the country's conscious.

does that story loom large for you? >> absolutely. my parents grew up in the segregated south in richmond, virginia. and they experienced a lot of what we know happened in selma. but what strikes me about what happened 50 years ago, the role the media played then, was really critical. the march on selma was one of the few times in the civil rights fight, if you will, that a news program interrupted one of its tv networks interrupted and americans of all colors watched in horror as black people were treated like animals, they were killed, they were whipped, chased by police on horses. it was just awful. but take when i reflect back on that and then i fast forward to today, i think the role of the media is to stoke racial divide. it's not to highlight as much -- right now -- >> let me come back to today. i want to get julie in on what

happened at selma in that era. so the national press now is viewed as having played a courageous role in covering those protests which on which more were often more violent. but at the time many segregations in the south railed against the liberal media. >> nothing much has changed. you have people using the media as their whipping boy to advance their own political view points. you certainly saw that over the big news events over the last week.points. you certainly saw that over the big news events over the last week. so i think that continues to be the case. the difference today of course is that we have many more media outlets with many more diverse viewpoints. back then, you had the big three and that's pretty much it p. and certainly big news papers. today you have the fox news channel, msnbc, cnn, blogs, everybody has an opinion. >> and not only that but most news outlets this 1965 had no

black reporters. p a lot more diverseity in the business today. so we go selma to eric holder announcing that there would be no charges against officer wilson in michael brown's death. a case that many in the recent turned into a cause celeb, hands up don't shoot according to obama administration was not true. so you're contrasting the unity of the press and role it played in 1965 with what you see as the divisiveness today? >> well i think as you and julie pointed out in 1965, we had zero diversity in the press and it was really the black journal i.s were the only ones putting a spotlight 00 civil rights. that's where people were able black americans specifically were able to get news with the civil rights movement. whereas today, you know, i think we have a diverse press corps. we have julie pointed that out everybody will have an opinion about what is the civil rights

movement today. what is it really. but to me i think what happened in ferguson became a narrative for president obama and democrats particularly to distort really what is causing more black americans to be engaged in violent crime. now, i'm not saying that -- i think we all knew darren wilson wasn't going to be charged with violating michael brown's civil rights because the sam thing happened happen same thing happened in the trayvon martin case. are you going to have racist journalists like you have racist people is this of course.martin case. are you going to have racist journalists like you have racist people is this of course. i think if you had an all black police force a lot of the things in that report would still occur because young black men in america the reality is are committing more violent crime. and i think that's -- >> let me get jewly in lyjulie in. some of those racist e-mails

were blood curdling. with a do you think what do you think about the immediate are a playing a divisive role? >> the goal is obviously to smoke debate and obviously to stoke a potential view point. ferguson is a very good example. you had all the major channels covering ferguson. it was saturated wall to wall. but certainly some people had one you viewpoint on it other people were pushing a different viewpoint and i think that's the difference. you do have that diversity of opinion and diversity of viewpoint although you still do cover civil rights incredibly extensively. >> i love that we have diversity of viewpoints. i'd also like journalists to stick to some of the facts. crystal wright and julie roginsky thanks very much for

joining us today. ahead we'll look at the controversy over ben carson telling cnn that being gay is a choice. did it the network treat him fairly fairly? but straight ahead, rand paul and why he spent time talking to openly liberal media outlets. this is my body of proof. proof of less joint pain. and clearer skin. this is my body of proof that i can fight psoriatic arthritis from the inside out... with humira. humira works by targeting and helping to block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to both joint and skin symptoms. it's proven to help relieve pain, stop further joint damage and clear skin in many adults. doctors have been prescribing humira for nearly 10 years. >>humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers including lymphoma have happened, as have blood, liver and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to

areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. >>visit humira.com and talk to your rheumatologist. humira. this is a body of proof!

[alarms blaring] ohhhhh... whoa whoa whoa! who's responsible for this?!?

if something goes wrong, you find a scapegoat. ...rick. it's what you do. ahhhhhhhh! what'd you say? uh-oh! kelly! if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. rick. don't walk away from me. ahhhhhhhh! rand paul isn't shy about mixing it up with the media. he has the scars to show it. as he gears up for a presidential campaign i sat down with him at cpac in maryland. senator "time" magazine calls you the most interesting man in politics. is the media fair to you? >> i think in order to be the most interesting, you sometimes have to be provocative so you get it from all barrels. and you're not really over the target unless you're receiving

flack. i tend to say what i think. i tend not to -- >> sugarcoat it? >> i don't sugarcoat it too much. sometimes i try, but it doesn't work. a lot of people rise up in politics from never offending anyone and their skill is in being bland. and i was in a position for 20 years, i just sort of look at the problem and try to figure out a solution and sometimes not everybody agrees with me. >> you've been aggressive against some of the potential 2016 candidates. crist chris chris christie being a bully. is there more of the guaranteed rand paul attacks fellow republican? >> i don't know. i think that the reason i do collect headline, really from the moment i ran, i don't know if that is luck or skill, i don't tend to be provocative

just to be provocative. i truly think it is hypocritical for someone who used mayorrijuana as a kid is for harsh penalties for people who do it. rich white kids aren't getting snatched up, it's poor black kid, poor hispanic kids poor white kids, they're the ones serving prison sentence. >> "washington post" had a big piece daddy issues are a problem for his son's, indicate i curekatie occurcouric has asked about it. >> and there could be a bush problem. there could be a clinton problem. and so there are several people who could possibly run who are associated with other famous people who have had their issues. but i think ultimately people aren't voting for a family or against a family, they're voting for the individual. and in my senate race,cessful to beat

an establishment candidate. >> and the question is about ron paul fair to the point that you share a well-known last name you have access to a fundraising network. >> it's always fair to ask about an issue and if people want to emphasize how the issue either agrees or disagrees with a member of your family so be it. but frankly if i have to go 20 minutes and you ask me to go through every issue i agree or disagree with my dad i don't think it's that entertaining and i'll probably just answer what i'm for. and people can make their judgment. but not everybody agrees with their parents on every issue and everybody is a distinct individual. you probably don't agree with your parents. >> i will not argue with you on that one. do you need to develop a thicker skin? you had a testy interview with kelly evans. i found her tone to be condescending, but you got a lot of flack for shushing her. >> hey, kelly, ssh. calm down a bit. p. >> yeah i did learn you're not

supposed to shush people. and a lot of people don't realize, you and i are doing this in the same room which makes for a better interview. but 95%, we're staring to a camera. i can see when you're getting ready to talk, you can see when i'm getting ready to talk and we try to be polite enough. but on tv when you're looking at a camera, it gets frustrating not the to butt in. >> you also betray impatience. >> and i think some people are very good. there are people on television channels who i have no idea what their political bias or background is. they're objective, good, and hardcore. but they don't ask questions that really are simply you can tell are targeted from your political opponents and i'm going to ask him something just to make him mad. but i'm human. i get mad sometimes. and i try to be as even keeled

as i can, but sometimes like everybody else, there are interviews that i would have done differently. >> i think people to like human candidates as opposed to the alternative. you wrote shall pundits are surprised that i support destroying isis. you've expressed reservations about military in the middle east. does the press hold you you as an items lagssolationist? >> i think they will try to characterize your position, you will have to present it and then can it be mischaracterized. i think it is mischaractersized because the way i look at foreign policy there is a spectrum from where nowhere any of the time to where everywhere all the time. i've been mainly complaining that we're everywhere. every civil war, sometimes with unintended consequences. so hillary's war in libya i think led to chaos and mourad cal islam and made us less safe. >> hillary's war. when she was secretary of state.

>> yes about that. she was a bigged a company advocate of it. >> you spoke about income inequality, lagging wages, black unemployment, you've been to ferguson. are the media surprised that a republican has taken on these kind of issues? >> yeah and i think it's been long overdue. before cpac, i'll talk about there being twoamericas. one that is treated fairly and another that is not treated fairly. i think criminal justice is not racist. i don't think it's countrydone purposely. but the outcome has had as can proportionate him pact on minorities. >> a little bit unusual for most republicans. >> i was at the white house yesterday and we had half republicans, half democratsu few younger republicans saying the same thing i am. >> you've got on bill maher

msnbc, what do you get out of that? >> i think you want to try to get to new people. if you want your party to be big bill maher has 4 million listeners who maybe a few aren't watching fox news. msnbc has an audience that isn't watching fox either. >> do you think you'll be talking to rachel madmaddow? >> there are certain rules that we have to develop over time and that might be one of them. >> which is? >> not to do that again. our hope is when we go on, they are independent minded. i'm find if they're log sif. but if it's just simply partisanship just to be partisan the problem be in washington is empty partisanship. >> finally, you were on fox news quite a bit as a guest. how helpful is that raising your profile potentially for 2016? >> i think have a ordinarily helpful and i think also the emergence of fox news has allowed there to be a conservative viewpoint. when i was a kid, they were

three nedtworks and they were all liberal. and now things are much more balanced. i still get the question the libya media. and i say it's so much better than it ever was about before.media. and i say it's so much better than it ever was about before. you look at fogs'sx's numbers and they dwarf the other networks. so i think there is an opportunity for a variety of opinions. all of these are out there. and i think it's been very helpful. p. >> senator paul, thanks very much for sitting down with me. >> thank you. next on "#mediabuzz," ben carson complains that cnn edited an interview in which he made highly controversial comments about why people are gay. we'll take a look in our video verdict. at ally bank no branches equals great rates. it's a fact. kind of like mute buttons equal danger. ...that sound good? not being on this phone call sounds good. it's not muted. was that you jason? it was geoffrey! it was jason.

it could've been brenda. the garden is the story of our lives... told and retold. it's as old as our time on earth. and as new as tomorrow. you can have a yard. or slightly less. gardening isn't about where we choose to live. it's about how we choose to live. miracle-gro. life starts here.

your mom's got your back. your friends have your back. your dog's definitely got your back. but who's got your back when you need legal help? we do. we're legalzoom, and over the last 10 years, we've helped millions of people protect their families and run their businesses. we have the right people on-hand to answer your questions backed by a trusted network of attorneys. so visit us today for legal help you can count on. legalzoom. legal help is here.

. . .

at ally bank no branches equals great rates. it's a fact. kind of like shopping hungry equals overshopping. there's been a lot of chatter about the media's gotcha question. ben carson was on cnn saying under the constitution same-sex marriage should be left to the states. when chris cuomo asked whether he felt the same argument applied to savelavery, dr. carson disagreed. >> it's not the same situation because people have no control over their race, for instance. >> you think they have control over their sexuality? >> absolutely. >> you think being gay is a choice? >> absolutely. >> why do you say that? >> because a lot of people who

go into prison go into prison state straight and when they come out, they were gay. >> you know there is a whole theory of dominance -- >> i said a lot of people who go in come out. are you denying that that's true? >> i'm not denying that's true, but i'm denying that that is a basis of understanding homosexuality. >> cuomo wasn't badgering him, he wasn't showing off. it was carson who took the question about same-sex marriage and the constitution and states rights and went to the question of choice on homosexuality, very controversial. american psychological association didn't agreeoesn't agree. carson called into sean hannity's radio show. >> there was a 25 minute interview that they chopped and you see what part they emphasized. i did learn something very important for certain networks never do a pre-taped interview. always do it live. >> but there was zero editing on

that whole part you just saw about the gay discussion. cuomo told me about seven minutes of the 25 minute interview were used including other topics, isis an rafrn.and iran. the rest posted online. but it's interesting that carson felt the need to apologize. and iran. the rest posted online. but it's interesting that carson felt the need to apologize.and iran. the rest posted online. but it's interesting that carson felt the need to apologize.nd iran. the rest posted online. but it's interesting that carson felt the need to apologize. i do not retend to know how every individual came to their sexual tir. i regret my words were hurtful and divisive. i apologize to all that were offended. i think ben carson got into trouble here, and he did to himself. after the break, we'll continue this, more on anchors and presidential candidates go toe to toe with chris walkered a met mitting he flip-flopped on immigration. when the moment's spontaneous, why pause to take a pill? or stop to find a bathroom? cialis for daily use is approved to

treat both erectile dysfunction and the urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision or any symptoms of an allergic reaction stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a free 30-tablet trial. you know, in any job any profession image matters. i want some gray...but not too much. only touch of gray uses oxygen to gently blend away some gray but not all for that perfect salt and pepper look. satisfaction guaranteed. just you and the look you want. just for men touch of gray

now for more on questions about journalism. when chris wallace sat down on sunday he showed the wisconsin governor a video in which walker said he would envision allowing illegal immigrants to become citizens if they met criteria. >> the question does request k you envision a world where if these people paid a penalty where they would have a path to citizenship and you said sure that makes sense. >> i envision a way you can do that. first, secure the border. not any of these plans make my e sense. >> tu it's a little bit slippery here. you actually supported the kennedy mccain comprehensive immigration plan. are you basically saying as part of a comprehensive plan tough enforcement. the 11 million people here pay

penalty and get citizenship. >> no. the reason for that is over time. >> you said you supported it. >> and my view has changed. i'm saying it. >> chris walker came armed with the facts. he got him to admit he changed his position. research is the key here and a willingness to have a long enough interview to get a politician off the talking points. finally chris matthew said he had a disclosure to make. >> it's important in my position to be as transparent as possible if w you our viewers. >> his wife a long time local anchor is planning to run for a house seat in maryland as a democrat. >> she's been involved with public issues her entire career. i know her commitment runs truly deep. and our nearly four decades together, i've always had the

strongest belief many her judgment and values. i am proud of her and support her. >> okay. that wasn't a disclosure. it was a campaign ad. of course he's going to support his wife. no problem with that. still to come your top tweets. with martin luther king once said about the media coverage of selma and a big time shakeup at nbc news. is that really a thing? it sounds made up. mucinex fast max night time for multi-symptom relief. breathe easy. sleep easy. let's end this.

a major shakeup at nbc in the brian williams suspension. the company is bringing back andrew lack who ran nbc in the 90s. he will run it for the today's show and meet the press and nsnbc. he will have to rebuild nightly news whether williams returns or not. time for your top tweets. are the media being too hard or

soft on hillary clinton over the media mess. all media ask her her staff state department hacks if he deleted any e-mails or if we would ever be able to know. lifrds giz zard. don't think it's a big deal. no necessary to nitpick. >> when journalists covered the civil rights movement. several journalists were badly beaten as we mentioned earlier. man that was there was cbs bill plan. >> leaders know the ballot is one of their most effective messages and 3467. >> reporter: i still have all of the scripts that i wrote in those days. on that afternoon the standup i did said they want their freedom. >> and that they want it now.

>> one night in february he tried to film a small demonstration. >> white bystanders harassed us, cursing us and blaming the press as the cause of the demonstration. >> the media didn't cause the protests but martin luther king noted their roll. king had words with a life magazine photographer who stopped taking pictures and tried to intervene when a gang of man shoved children to the ground. he said the world doesn't know this happened because you didn't photograph it. it is so much important for you to take a picture of us getting beaten up than for you to be another person joining in the fray. interesting echo of what happened 50 years ago in selma, alabama. that's it for this edition of media buzz. we hope you like our facebook page. we post a lot of original con at the present time there. we have your buzz. i respond on video to your questions. you can also e-mail us any time. media buzz at fox news.com.

more on the media next week and more on your questions and more of the latest buzz. today we remember an important day in american history. bloody sunday. thousands including attorney general eric holder gathering in selma, alabama to commemorate the events of 50 years ago when police brutally beat civil rights demonstrators. >> hello, everyone. welcome to america's news head quarters. >> hello everyone. it was march 7th, 1965. demanding voting rights for african americans were attacked by alabama state troopers and others. that brazen assault and the images the nation witnessed helped build the momentum leegd