thank you for being with us tonight. we will see you all again tomorrow night right here at 7:00 p.m. eastern. up next, the o'reilly factor. good night from washington. go to gretawire.com. vote in our poll. paragraph the o'reilly factor is on. tonight. >> hello madam secretary did you sign that statement before you left the state? >> why won't hillary clinton answer that question? why won't the state department answer that simple question he? things are getting complicated in the email controversy. charles krauthammer and i will deal with it. >> the state department has turned over its 300 of clinton's emails on benghazi biased on what you have seen did she do anything wrong? >> the other clinton situation has to deal doo with deleted emails. where does charles krauthammer think that will go? we will find out. >> why do you think this film spanked the competition at the box office? >> spanks the competition. [ laughter ] >> also ahead, watters world

the gray edition we hope it won't be too painful. >> we are under arrest. >> caution, you are about to enter the no spin zone the factor begins right now. ♪ ♪ hi, i'm bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. what will happen to hillary clinton? that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo there are really just two main dilemmas for the former secretary of state. did she sign an exit statement from the state department saying she turned over all public information to the government? did she sign it? yes or no? today ed henry put that question to mrs. clinton. >> hello madam secretary did you sign the separation statement before you left state? did you sign that statement? >> now, i'm confused why did she not answer ed's question? i'm also confused because

the state department itself surely knows the answer but is stonewalling. >> last week i think a couple times you were asked about whether the department has a record of former secretary clinton signing the separation form. >> i don't have an update on this matter. we're still working on it i understand. >> i mean, you know, a human resources department presumably has a file on every employee it can't be that difficult. >> i don't think former secretaries are. >> they don't have. >> standard employees. >> they might not be but how hard can it be -- >> -- i understand why you are asking. we are looking to get an answer. i don't have an answer today. >> why not? why not? this has been going on for 14 days. here is another question. who is telling ms. psaki to stonewall? somebody is. john kerry is in charge but is he negotiating nukes with the iranians, why we care about the exit document? i i mean, this is so strange. everybody knows the state department is dodging. why are they doing it? >> it's similar to the bowe

bergdahl situation. everybody knows the army knows exactly what sergeant bergdahl did in afghanistan. so why delay the announcement? the fallout is going to be the same, now or in two months. why embarrass a proud institution like the army by playing games? none of this makes any sense at all. there is no way that hillary clinton can avoid the separation agreement deal with the state department. she either signed it or she didn't. so say it already. all of this is insulting to we, the people. we pay hillary clinton's salary. we pay jen psaki's salary. public officials answer to the folks. only they don't. i'm teed off here. this game playing at our expense is horrendous. however, the separation agreement is the least of hillary clinton's problems right now. the email deletions will make that look like small change. super or later, most likely later, mrs. clinton will have to testify under oath about her emails.

that will be high drama. it may be true she is not guilty of anything and that presumption should be stated. but hillary clinton is now a star witness in the court of public opinion, which is a rough place for folks who evade legitimate questions. americans should want powerful people to be held accountable for what they do on the public's dime. enough with the evasions. let's have some straight talk. and that's the memo. now for the top story tonight. what happened today in the land of fog and mist? with us here in new york city chief white house correspondent ed henry who is watching the clinton story very closely. what did we learn today besides the fact she doesn't like you? >> she said hello to me, i guess. >> she said hello, everybody, i was the only one standing there. >> so you were everybody? >> i was everybody. every man. and she didn't answer. i think look i think jen psaki actually let out some truth there by saying former secretary is not a normal employee. >> so what? >> she actually is a normal

employee. she still works for us as you said. james carville revealed a truth by the way when he said on ax the reason why she had her own email was she didn't want republicans like louie government rooting through them. that means she didn't want congressional oversight. if you are secretary of state you can't say i don't want congressional. >> all of those things pail, henry in comparison to the stupidity that we are witnessing. jen psaki has a nerve to get out there after 14 days and say she doesn't know come on. i mean, this is -- hillary clinton is the most famous secretary of state since daniel webster. all right? everything she does is chronicled. the state department knows whether she signed it or not. >> right. it is a simple question. and i get that it's been a couple of years. but as jen psaki says she wasn't a normal employee. figure that out. you have a file somewhere. what did mrs. clinton sign and what did she not? you would think there is a file somewhere.

>> 14 days. and when megyn kelly first had this story we called the state department and said do you have it they said we need more time. >> more time. like bowe bo dal. they need more time. only had it since october. we are heading into april, more time. if hillary clinton did not sign the state department departure slip, it's not illegal. it's just a violation of procedure at the state department. >> procedure at the state department. that will raise more questions for trey gowdy and other republicans did she deliberately not sign that document because her lawyers might have known that if you sign the document saying i'm accounting for all of these public records and then you leave with tens of thousands of emails, you are essentially committing perjury. if you don't line document did, she know, look, i'm leaving with these emails. >> he bet she didn't sign it if she signed it she would say hey, it's good to see you, i like the pocket hankie, i signed it. why would she -- if she signed it, why wouldn't she tell you? >> right. >> she was going to an irish thing today right? >> irish american hall of fame. i heard from a source there that you were inducted last

year. >> i think i was, yes, i was. i'm in the hall of fame. but irish people have a tendency to talk straight. you know, and it was a little blarney, i know that. >> it was revealed today she is not irish. >> then why is she in the irish hall of fame. >> england wales, scotland and the bottom line is because she fought for peace in northern ireland they decided and the dozens of potential you know, u.s. ambassadors to ireland who are all lobbying her. taking pictures. >> she is trying to get out there and turn the page on the email deal. start going to key constituents like irish americans and start campaigning. you are right there are more questions. more questions about the clinton foundation by the way. the money pouring in there while she was secretary of state. >> did china give a couple million. >> from a chinese construction company that is very close to the chinese communist government. >> while she was on job. >> the contribution came in 2013 after she left. i spoke to the senate majority leader mitch mcconnell today did some reporting on this look, the house is looking at the emails, the senate, he told

me, may start looking at the foundation and saying okay, the money came in after she was secretary of state, but mitch mcconnell told me did she raise that money? was she raising other money? saudi arainia others, while she was secretary of state? we don't have an answer to that. >> you will never have one. she will never answer that question. but the separation agreement she has to answer ed henry, everybody there he is. on the rundown, charles krauthammer on the iranian nuke situation which halls evolved into one big mess. he will also talk about hillary clinton. then the man who shot two cops in ferguson, missouri, was he a legitimate protester? factor is coming right back. with terrible chest congestion. better take something. theraflu severe cold doesn't treat chest congestion. really? new alka-seltzer plus day powder rushes relief to your worst cold symptoms plus chest congestion. oh, what a relief it is. here we go! meet the world's newest energy superpower. surprised? in fact, america is now the world's

number one natural gas producer... and we could soon become number one in oil. because hydraulic fracturing technology is safely recovering lots more oil and natural gas. supporting millions of new jobs. billions in tax revenue... and a new century of american energy security. the new energy superpower? it's red, white and blue. log on to learn more.

continuing now with lead story what is likely to happen to hillary clinton. joining us now is charles krauthammer. you said the story has long legs. i agreenot going to go away because republicans are

going to see it as a way to damage hillary clinton. and i think most of the folks really want to know what the real story is. but aren't you insulted the way i am about the state department after 14 days can't tell you whether she signed this piece of paper or not? i mean, this is just insane, is it not? >> it's the 1990s all over again. this is what they, the clintons did on every scandal, every issue every embarrassment in the 90's. they dragged it out. when you drag it out long enough, i mean you lie directly to the american people many the lewenski candle scandal. you drag it out and six months later as you confess as the president did it's already old news. and you get away with it. that's been the mode mode dison her mode disper ren day.

the stonewall is not going to work. the reason it's got legs is this normally a scandal depends on the interest of the public which in itself is an interest of the media the media would not necessarily go after a democrat or clinton on its own. here is something different. you can have lawsuits brought by judicial watch which is an enemy that has revealed a lot of this stuff already earlier. you can have lawsuit that was filed last week by the associated press under the freedom of information act. you can have three separate committees of congress issuing subpoenas. so those are going to keep the story going. it may not be a story every day going on from now on in the median term, but it will not go away. it will keep popping up as these subpoenas and a lawsuits go public. and get to a crisis between now and election day. >> but isn't it mysterious.

>> that's why you can't dodge it. >> isn't it mysterious that a very simple question about signing a piece of paper that says you handed over all your stuff to the government before leaving as secretary of state. we can't get an answer for two weeks on that. and mrs. clinton just kind of throws it off. why wouldn't she say no, i signed it. i didn't sign it yes i signed it and here is why. i mean do they think they are going to get away with it? i know they want to drag it out, i know i know, i know. it's a news cycle now that's very intense. anybody can bring back anything at any time and throw it right in the public's face. so i mean, why don't you just get it over with? >> well, it leads your program, it should be leading other programs. but did you see it today on the front page of the "times" or the "the washington post"? or leading the other networks? no. it isn't as if you can't get away with it if you drag it out long enough. and i suspect that she can't say i signed it because if she did, she is guilty of

perjury. this is a pretty big deal. >> so she didn't sign it that's what i said to henry, she didn't sign it i don't think she signed it. >> if she didn't sign it, then state obama state department has to explain why they allow her well as the jen psaki said, she is not a regular employee, meaning she like the clintons, is above and beyond and the reach of the law, she is in her own universe, where the rules don't apply. and the obama administration would have conspired with her in not applying the rule that everybody has to sign a separation agreement. so, it's not a pretty picture. >> inspector general of the state department, isn't that person supposed to really run herd over all of this crazy stuff? should the inspector general come out tomorrow and say look, she didn't sign it or she did sign it? >> you have seen inspector general's run aring herd over other departments? whatever happened to the irs scandal? that was inspector general. >> yeah but that on the fifth amendment hawlted

that. fifth amendment halted that whole thing and then they wouldn't waive any penalty for lerner so that she didn't have to testify. that was another strange thing. but, know what i'm talking about. because you are smarter than i am. just a little. you have that ph.d. and i only have two master's degrees. just a little bit ahead of me. but you know bowe bergdahl. i mean they know what bergdahl did. they just stonewalling. what do they think? it's going to be better for them when they announce it in may than announcing it now? i don't get it. i don't get it, krauthammer. look, to prove your pound about smartness, you didn't get the biography right i don't have a ph.d. >> a medical degree. i have to talk to dr. . >> i have got an m.d. >> an m.d. >> i understand. now, look because of the disparity here i will try to make it simple and talk slowly. >> good. >> with the bergdahl thing they know where they have to go.

the army knows where it has to go. the administration does not want it to go to a court martial. and they are either negotiating among themselves or again, stonewalling thinking that people won't care. you drag it out long enough and you could drag it out into the next administration if you have to. but i'm sure they are trying to get the army to in a sense knuckle under cave in to its own principles find a way to dump this guy without a court martial. >> they already gotten the army to stone call it. -- stonewall it because the army knows they already succeeded there. the armed forces are not supposed to be politicized. we are going to hold charles over with more brilliance to talk about the iranian nuke mess and it is a mess. later, megyn kelly on a bizarre crime story when an alleged killer may have confessed on hbo. those reports after these messages.

allowed me to start investing for my retirement. transamerica made it easy. [ female announcer ] everyone has a moment when tomorrow becomes real. transamerica. transform tomorrow.

it's more than a network. it's how you stay connected. with centurylink as your trusted technology partner you get an industry leading broadband network and cloud and hosting services. centurylink. your link to what's next. get fast-acting, long-lasting relief from heartburnwith it neutralizes stomach acid and is the only product that forms a protective barrier that helps keep stomach acid in the stomach where it belongs. for fast-acting, long-lasting relief. try gaviscon®.

impact segment tonight it. switzerland hoping to get a deal to stop the mullahs prosecute developing a nuclear weapon. people do not trust president obama to make an effective deal. therefore, 47 republican senators wrote directly to the iranian leadership saying that any agreement might be changed after mr. obama leaves office. that has angered mr. kerry. >> this letter was absolutely calculated directly to interfere with these negotiations. it's specifically inserts itself directly to the leader of another country we're going to change this which by the way is not only contrary to the constitution with respect to the executive's right to negotiate but it is

incorrect. because they cannot change an executive agreement. >> rejoining us from washington charles krauthammer. so if john kerry were sitting in this chair, right now. what would you say to him? >> i would say mr. kerry, is it not rich that you should be criticizing 47 senators who are writing about an agreement that they believe is harmful to the country? and you are calling them acting unconstitutionally and contrary to the interest of the their country when you yourself spoke openly and to the world declaring your own country guilty of war crimes while we were in the middle of a war, in fact, deposit prix accommodations were the and these are your words. again ging icon in that fake

accent of yours and you are here condemning others of speaking about their country. that's the add homonym. as to the substance of, this i would say this was not a letter about the content of the agreement and disagreement with its -- with what is in it. this was a letter saying you cannot do this without the congress, mr. president, and expect the united states as a country and the congress, the entire government as an institution to be bound by it. >> does kerry have legal footing when he says you can't undo the deal once its made? i understood that another president can come in and undo that deal. and say look, you know, we don't think it's a good deal so we're not going to abide by it. >> that is correct. kerry contradicted himself having said a few days earlier that, of course the agreement is not legally binding. the point here is not even the legalities of it. the point is that when we

negotiate a serious arms control agreement in the nuclear age, we always involve the congress, either the house on the senate or just the senate. as a matter of constitutional decency that if you are going to do something of this import, of this greaft. and this iran agreement if signed will be the most important agreement of this generation. to do this unilaterally, to cut out the congress and to say that if congress take as vote that it will be involved in the rad did iification of this. the president will exercise a veto and cut it out completely? that is something that i think is utterly unacceptable. and the senators in their objection to that kind of action are entirely correct. >> okay. now, you said it would have been better had the senators sent the letter to president obama. not the iranian mullahs. by saying and kept it in-house because now john kerry and others are saying you know what? if we don't get a deal, it's

the republican's fault. you know that's coming down the lane. so, if the republicans could have sent it and kept it in house and said we need you confer with us because of the reasons you just stated that probably would have been a better play. >> of course it would. that's the first thing i said on the first night it came up. you don't address it to the ayatollahs. although the implication of the opposition by saying this is an act of treason, you are going behind the president is, of course, preposterous. this is not a secret letter dropped in the mailbox in a dropped somewhere you know, that an iranian agent would pick it up. this was a bloody open letter to the world. so it should have simply been addressed either to the president, the american people, to united states allies or to no one in particular and say here's our position, you have to bring in the congress because without the congress on board, this agreement

will be much more fragile and temporary than it ought to be. and that is exactly right. >> how do you see this playing out now? you know, it's speculative but, you know, you know what's going on here. how do you see it coming down? because there is only maybe three months that they have got to get this thing done. and they have to have a framework within weeks. how do you see it? >> right. well they have got to have something to show by the end of the month. i think what's happened here is that the combination of the netanyahu speech and of the letter despite the fact that given the opposition, the opportunity for all these distractions about talking about protocol and process, despite that it has brought to the attention of the american people and congress how bad the agreement is. i think it's its immediate effect is that it stopped the administration in its tracks from giving away the whole store. >> yeah, even more.

>> it gave away 80% of the store, but it has not been able to go the final few miles of this. and that's why i think there may not be an agreement because the iranians want everything. the administration would otherwise, i think, have given them everything. >> right. >> so they may not happen. >> blame the republicans if no deal is made, right? >> that's exactly what he would do. >> charles krauthammer, everybody the doctor is in. plenty more ahead as the factor moves along. a bizarre story where a man apparently confessed to three murders on hbo. watters on why people want to see "fifty shades of grey." >> did you learn anything from the movie? >> actually, i had to look things up afterwards because i didn't know what they meant. >> oh really? >> they wouldn't let watters. in we hope you stay tuned to those reports. ...and if necessary, it will even brake all by itself.

it is a luxury suv engineered to get you there and back safely. for tomorrow is another fight. the 2015 m-class. see your authorized dealer for exceptional offers through mercedes-benz financial services. i found an apartment. right on the water. amazing views. it was perfect. this is the place. there's just one little problem... it's got everything. i barely get a signal so i can't download videos or stream music. i don't have that problem. i'm on verizon. i'm not. sometimes i get a signal if i hold my shower curtain rod with one hand... but not always. join us and save without settling on the largest most reliable network. ♪ ♪ (ee-e-e-oh-mum-oh-weh) (hush my darling...)

(don't fear my darling...) (the lion sleeps tonight.) (hush my darling...) man snoring (don't fear my darling...) (the lion sleeps tonight.) woman snoring take the roar out of snore. yet another innovation only at a sleep number store.

i'm louis, and i quit smoking with chantix. quitting smoking is a challenge and it's a lot easier to go into a fight when you've got somebody that's got your back. having chantix as a partner made it more successful. along with support, chantix (varenicline) is proven to help people quit smoking. chantix helped reduce my urge to smoke. some people had changes in behavior, thinking or mood hostility, agitation, depressed mood and suicidal thoughts or actions while taking or after stopping chantix. some people had seizures while taking chantix. if you have any of these stop chantix and call your doctor right away. tell your doctor about any history of mental health problems, which could get worse while taking chantix or history of seizures. don't take chantix if you've had a serious allergic or skin reaction to it. if you develop these stop chantix and see your doctor right away as some can be life-threatening.

tell your doctor if you have a history of heart or blood vessel problems or develop new or worse symptoms. get medical help right away if you have symptoms of a heart attack or stroke. decrease alcohol use while taking chantix. use caution when driving or operating machinery. common side effects include nausea trouble sleeping and unusual dreams. chantix absolutely helped me quit smoking. ask your doctor if chantix is right for you. fact for follow up segment tonight, missouri police have arrested a 20-year-old man for shooting two police officers in ferguson last week. shortly after the shooting, i said this: >> now, i believe the protesters did not, did not shoot the officers. this was a calculated ambush by anarchists, people who want to create violent situations inside the u.s.a. >> well i was half right. the suspect jeffrey williams apparently not a local protester. it looks like he is simply a thug. joining us now from washington mary katharine

ham and here in the studio juan williams. i think this whole ferguson deal and by the way this guy has admitted shooting the officer. he said he was aiming at someone else like that makes it better. i missed the guy i really want to kill. so i got two officers. so he is toast. but i think that this story now is making all sides angrier at each other. am i wrong? >> no. the polls support you. i mean, the polls are clear that people think race relations in the country are getting worse and especially under president obama. i happen to personally disagree. i think that the depositions right now are long known especially to the poor black community and police department of our country. have you people having to discuss them and oh i don't like this. somebody is calling me a racist and say i have a chip on my soldier if i'm black. i don't like it. it makes me uncomfortable. the reality of race relations in the country and difficult relations between police having a police what is oftentimes a highly violent and dysfunctional poor black community in the country is real bill. ongoing. >> okay.

but anybody watching the ferguson story and i think people are tired of it now. they are not sympathizing anymore with the overall message because you have got two police officers, mary katharine who were shot. that just wipes out any kind of like, well, you know maybe there was a point that ferguson police officers were targeting blacks for low level beefs like walking off the curb. that was wrong. they were trying to raise revenue on the backs of poor people. that's wrong. that's all gone now. it's all gone. it's like they ought to just close ferguson. close it, lock the door, get out. >> look, i think you are exactly right in a political sense when it comes to appealing to normal americans. but these results will not get you there. this is very dangerous. not just for police but for self-interested protesters on the other side. it's very dangerous for their political ends right? because nobody is listening to you. sort of with good reason because they are scared about what the fallout here is. but, here's the thing. do i get a little bit worried about saying rhetoric or protests caused

violence like there can be incitement. there is a very specific definition for that and this guy says by the way the police identify him as being among the protesters on that night and being among them on other times. so, they do have to weigh exactly what is going on here. and how to. >> it wasn't a local guy, mary katharine he came from st. louis. >> um-huh. >> st. louis is nearby. >> yes. but he wasn't living in ferguson. he wasn't the target of unfair treatment. he was a guy who was carrying around a loaded gun, is he already on probation, and then you have got a gun. that makes him a thug. >> here's the thing, bill. i think you are right in your discussions of this to bring some complexity to it because what really is damaging when we attack each one of these stories like it was hands up, don't shoot. that was not the full truth. according to the holder doj darren wilson was not guilty of that. you couldn't have brought charges against him. >> that disrupts the narrative that the press wants. the press wants a certain

narrative. >> hold on but here is the other simplification. yes there are system mick problems in the police force and yes those should be addressed and they can't be addressed under these situations. >> ferguson have a new police chief now and they have to do better. going back to your point that race regions between black americans and white americans are not good right now, do you have any solution? i mean is there anything that can make them better? >> you know what i think? there is lots that can make them better. >> give me one. >> there is election coming up in ferguson. for the first time. >> but nobody cares. >> yeah, they do. if you have. >> people on the ground care about. >> it people joining and working together and building because trust is everything. >> from seattle to key west and from holeton, maine to san diego there is a tension that has developed. i'm not seeing what the solution to that is. >> i don't think it's any big mystery. i think it's trust like you and me talking. sometimes you get mad at me and sometimes i get mad at you. you know me and i know you. i don't think it's

theoretical. >> i don't think there is a policy that could unite. after 9/11, americans came together. >> that was -- you know he what happens is you get democrats say oh, the blacks are the democratic constituency. >> that's true. >> that's not healthy because then you get it politically polarized, racially polarized. >> that's true. >> break it down. mary katharine, i have got to run. juan is trying now because he has a tie with little shamrocks on there. >> you like this? >> nobody is buying it it, williams. you know what i'm talking about? >> i one sentence had therein there been shootings of any type turned against the government at a tea party rally that would have been a dead movement in this country because the media would have completely condemned it and had nothing to do with it i don't care that's fair they can't be blaming this stuff on us and not taking responsibility for it. >> interrupted the nice little narrative that the media wanted. and now it's all. >> nice protests that can be had. >> mary katharine and juan. when we come back. very bizarre murder story played out on hbo.

then watters asking movie goers why they are spending money on this grey business, 50 shades. up ahead. the pm pain reliever. that dares to work all the way until... [birds chirping] the am. new aleve pm. it's the first to combine a safe sleep aid plus the 12 hour strength of aleve. for pain relief that can last all the way until morning. new aleve pm, for a better am. you know, just because your bladder is changing, it doesn't mean you have to. with tena, let yourself go. be the one with the crazy laugh. and keep being their favorite playmate. with tena's unique super absorbent micro beads

that lock in moisture and odor... tena lets you be you. at old dominion, we see freight... ...as a combination of products and customers. every on-time arrival is backed by thousands of od employees, ...who make sure the millions of products we ship arrive without damages. because od employees treat customer service... ...like our most important delivery. od. helping the world keep promises. the real question that needs to be asked is "what is it that we can do that is impactful?" what the cloud enables is computing to empower cancer researchers. it used to take two weeks to sequence and analyze a genome; with the microsoft cloud we can analyze 100 per day. whatever i can do to help compute a cure for cancer, that's what i'd like to do.

thanks for stay with us in the kelly file tonight. 70-year-old robert durst has been charged with murder by the los angeles police department.

this after mr. durst was featured on hbo on a show called the jinks. jinx the air to a no state fortune was suspected of killing his wife and a friend. in 2001 he was actually acquitted of murder in texas it. but on the hbo program durst said this about the three incidents. >> >> here now to explain further the anchor of the kelly file seen immediately after the factor, ms. megyn. >> i don't follow this kind of stuff. i thought the jinx was a show about a cat. and, you know it was on hbo but apparently this guy has been teasing, teasing people about these alleged crimes and now because of this tape. >> not exactly. but he has been in the news a lot over the past 30 years for several murders. >> you know, you don't do a television program. >> yes. >> put yourself out there. >> the first murder happened

in 1982 of his wife. he was suspected in it and jeanine pirro, a woman you may know by the name of jeanine pirro was the west chester d.a. 20 years later. i'm picking that up cold case. the body was never found. i believe he did it i'm going to start looking at this. lo and behold the woman who was believed to have the most information with that case she wound up dead just as soon as she was contacted by jeanine pirro he. >> how was she killed? >> she was shot assassination style inside of the apartment he was her good friend. weighs in california at the time she died. although the police could never place him in l.a. they could only place him in the state of california. >> where did she die? >> inside her apartment building. >> where? >> in her living room. >> no, but what city? >> los angeles. >> so she was in los angeles. he was in los angeles. >> they can't put him in l.a. they can only get him as far as california. the cops couldn't actually put him in the city of l.a. never mind in her apartment. but, the killer of that woman, who was about to be contacted and interviewed by

jeanine pirro wrote the police a letter. do you know how these guys somehow they want to be caught. they send these letters sometimes. all it said was cadaver inside the home. with her address. and it was addressed to the beverly hills police. there was an envelope with the writing on it so they found the cadaver. see it there? and they knew that the killer had written this letter but they couldn't find the killer. well, flash forward a few years later. he goes on the lamb. he goes down to texas and he winds up killing his neighbor. he admits to that murder. i had to kill him because he was coming after me. tried to hurt me. what they believe is the neighbor identified him as robert durst this guy who was on the lamb for two other alleged murders and so he had to take out the neighbor. he chopped him up into little pieces. and threw the remains in the bay down there in galveston. the up, everything except the head, which is where he shot the guy. and so it was very difficult to disprove self-defense. the prosecution believed there would have been two bullet holes in that head which would have shown it

wasn't self-defense. >> self-defense you chop the guy up and throw him in the bay. >> that's why people think it's it laughable. >> but the jury acquitted him. >> the jury acquitted him not only that they had an interview with the juror who said i believe he is innocent. >> walk to the bay by himself. >> the guy was coming after durst he panicked and hid the body. the lawyers did a very good job. >> i bet. so, anyway, he gives an interview to this film maker because he did a movie about this called all good things in 2010 and durst, i think, fell a little bit in love with the film maker and ryan gosselin played him and said, you know what? i will talk to you. this guy here that's the film maker with the beard dereky did unbelievable job of interviewing him repeatedly and in the end the climax of the six hour documentary that aired on hbo he has him dead to rights because he shows him that letter that was written by the killer of that woman. dereky found another letter

that this guy admittedly wrote and the handwriting is. >> the same? >> identical. identical. >> so why did he say -- >> -- then there was a quote, confession moments after. that was the big moment. so i i mean, he already had me when he had this. look at the writing. >> he didn't confess directly though. he was -- he thought the mike was off or something? >> so i have never been in a men's room with men but i'm thinking when you go in there you are not like i killed them all, they got me i'm caught. so humiliated by that interview. >> he is still miked up when he is in the men's room. >> he has a mike on. you and i know that mike is on. >> anything can pick up anything. >> anything. he apparently didn't. >> arrest him. take him back to los angeles. they are going to charge him. he won't get off this time. >> i don't think so. a lot of lawyers don't think that tape is coming in. i think it's coming into evidence. and mr. durst. >> why would it not come into evidence? >> because his lawyers are going to argue that the film makers crossed over into agents of the police because they had been speaking to the police. they are going to argue that

somehow violated his right to privacy because typically, believe it or not, when you are in the bathroom, your privacy rights aren't protected. >> he brought the mike with hill. nobody slapped it on him. >> when you anchor your show at fox news you have to go to the little boy's room you take the mike off. that's what i do. >> i have got to correct you i go to the big boy's room. >> let me tell you i don't trust. when they say turn it off. we're going to take the whole thing off. >> kelly convicted the guy on tv tonight. >> i didn't have to do it he did it himself. >> there you go. >> he stood at the urge saying i killed them all. i it wasn't kelly. >> okay. she will be with us in a short period of time, just her. without me. i will be in the big boy's room. watters on deck. "fifty shades of grey" should be interesting. right back with it.

. . . . . . . . . .

you're driving along, having a perfectly nice day, when out of nowhere a pick-up truck slams into your brand new car. one second it wasn't there and the next second... boom! you've had your first accident. now you have to make your first claim. so you talk to your insurance company and... boom! you're blindsided for a second time. they won't give you enough money to replace your brand new car. don't those people know you're already shaken up? liberty mutual's new car replacement will pay for the entire value of your car plus depreciation. call and for drivers with accident forgiveness, liberty mutual won't raise your rates due to your first accident. switch to liberty mutual insurance and you could save up to $423 dollars. call liberty mutual for a free quote today at see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance.

tonight. "watters' world," a huge hit grossing close to $550 million worldwide. so we sent watters out to find out why people are spending money on this kind of stuff. >> what did you guys just see? >> "fifty shades of grey". >> oh very naughty. what's it about? a painter? >> no. >> i haven't seen it yet. i got tied up at home. >> i saw it twice. >> holy underwear. >> what's the movie about? >> i got a weak stomach. >> it's about a young girl and a

very rich man and a lot of sex. >> does your husband know you're here? >> absolutely. >> have you guys made your wives watch fifty shades? >> no they went on their own. >> did they bring back any tips? >> not that we've seen. >> explain the fifty shades phenomenon? >> it's like a fantasy thing. you know young girl meets rich man, has great sex. that's what every woman wants isn't it? >> you're making me turn fifty shades of red. >> it's housewives who are -- >> are you a desperate housewife? >> i am not. i can proudly say i am not. >> but you've seen it twice. >> but i've seen it twice. >> why are people flocking to this film? >> you learn something. >> did you enjoy the movie? >> i did. i did. i read the book. >> hard cover? >> i like the book much better. i didn't like the movie. two thumbs down. >> no what i sayin? >> why do you think this film

spanks the competition at the box office? >> spanks the competition. [ laughter ] >> now, after you saw fifty shades, what was she like? >> she was pretty wild that night. it was just part of the show. >> you told her to go see it again? >> she can see it any time she wants. >> hot wax, yes or no? >> yes. >> i like the idea. >> reporter: spanking? >> yes. >> it's okay. i've never participated in it. >> discipline, yes or no? >> sometimes yes. >> yes, definitely. control. >> do you like to be controlled? >> yes, i like a dominating woman. >> is she a dominating woman? >> yes, very strong-willed. >> do i look like a dominant guy or a submissive guy? >> i think you look like a submissive guy. >> if you guys need anything in there, bring these. >> give this cookie an hour before we're doing the no-pants dance. >> she has ones with --

>> good to be bad. >> mrs. robinson, you're trying to seduce me. >> i'm watters and this is my world right here. >> oh, hi watters. >> calm down ladies. >> now, you know some of those people are going to have to leave the country. they're not going to be able to ever live in the united states again. >> i think i should start saying no to you sometimes. >> did you watch that movie? >> of course not. >> you didn't go watch it? >> no, no way. are you crazy? i don't want to be seen in that movie. >> okay. >> bad enough that woman said to me you're a big star. i said, yeah i'm sitting here with handcuffs at a movie theater on a friday night. >> let me get this straight that movie that woman said you're a big star? >> yeah, i disagree. >> okay. she had seen the movie five times? >> yeah. >> on friday watters doesn't know this but we're having a special "watters' world" on friday. the dumbest things ever said to watters.

>> is it an hour? >> i mean yeah. "the factor" tip of the day are we taking over the world? you bet we are. the tip moments away. it's more than the cloud. it's multi-layered security and flexibility. with centurylink you get advanced technology solutions. including cloud and hosting services - all from a trusted it partner. centurylink. your link to what's next.

tip of the day in a moment the "the factor" message worldwide. first the mail. laura california. i find it beyond frustrating that when glenn beck exposed george so ros and the far left for political reasons, very few paid attention. bill, your guests imply george soros wants instability and favors violence. we didn't discuss the many radical groups he gives to, but some of those groups are loathsome beyond description. so while i would not say soros favors violence he's certainly comfortable with his money bringing harm to other human beings.

virginia beach, mr. o, i look forward to your banter with gutfeld and mcguirk. washington, gutfeld is tiring and a drag on "the factor." sly and the family stone. different strokes for different folks. dan, omaha, nebraska. bill, how many e-mails you get each day and how long before they're tossed? thousands daily, but they're all read and the ones that are pithy and lively are forwarded to me. everybody has an equal chance to get on the air. i keep them in my office it depends, you know, a few days. that's probably accurate. staten island, new york. o'reilly finally became a billoreilly.com premium member. it better be worth it. oh staten island, you lucked out. we'll have a big announcement soon that will make your p.m. status shine. bonnie and dwight texas. mr. o, we attended the don't be a pinhead show in san ant tone

yo on friday, one of the finest evenings. saw you and miller in grand prairie outside dallas on saturday. excellent banter between the two of you. it helped miller was sober. we had a great time in the lone star state. new mexico up next saturday april 11th. details on billoreilly.com. frankfurt, illinois. i think killing patton should be required reading for all american high school students. so do i, j.a. in order to shape the world we're living in right now. and a toast to aud ree webster on long island who turned 100 years old a few weeks ago. here's to you, audrey. finally tonight, "the factor" tip of the day, spreading the word worldwide. we've shown chinese editions of "killing jesus," going crazy even where christianity is not the primary religion. there's a fascination with the

most famous man in the world. and how he got that way. here are the italian editions of killing jesus and killing kennedy, very satisfying to see the book so widely distributed. there's even a bulgarian edition. killing jesus the movie will be shown worldwide. you can see it sunday march 29th palm sunday eve on the national geographic channel at 8:00 and 11:00 eastern time. they put it on 11:00 again so it's 8:00 on the west coast. that's how that goes. next week we will show you a bit of the film killing jesus and we'll talk with some of the actors including kelsey grammar. "the factor" tip of the day. that is it for us tonight. check out the fox news factor website different from billoreilly.com. spout off about "the factor" from anywhere in the world. name and town if you wish to opine. name of the day, do not be acidulous, a new one, when

writing to "the factor." again, thanks for watching us tonight. ms. megyn is next. i'm bill o'reilly. please remember the spin stops here cause we're definitely looking out for you. breaking tonight, pressure is building as "the kelly file" leads the charge on a key question in hillary clinton's e-mail scandal. did she sign a separation form and commit perjury as she left the state department? this as team clinton now changes its story about how it deleted allegedly personal hillary e-mails. and a key clinton ally makes an on-the-record admission that directly contradicts what mrs. clinton told america. welcome to "the kelly file" everyone. i'm megyn kelly. it is a simple question still unanswered. almost one week ago in a "the kelly file" exclusive we broke the story on live tv. did then-secretary of state clinton sign a separation agreement as she left the department