inheritance" story you would like to share with us? we would love to hear it. sense me an, nai e-mail or go t website strangeinheritance.com. tonight on "justice. >> mexico, i respect the country. they're taking our job, they're taking our manufacturing, they're taking our money, they're taking everything and they're killing us on the border. >> gone old double standard, trump gets even tougher on illegal immigration. hear what he said today. plus, sanctuary cities, some people still support them. even after kate steinly's senseless death. i take on one of those supporters. >> this president does not believe in american military might. it's that simple. >> and outrage aimed at

president obama. one congressman tells me he is the worst commander-in-chief in the last two decades. hello, welcome to "justice." i'm judge janine pirro. thanks, for being with us. i want to talk tonight to you an issue under the radar proving fate am, there are more than 200 sank can you wear cities in the united states where government employees and law enforcement cannot or do not report or share information or hand over illegals to immigration. even if federal authorities say they want them, even if the illegal is a career criminal. the concept of sanctuary cities is wrong. it is fundamentally flawed and because of this must mious result to follow law, you and

your family are in real danger. so why? the premises that this protects illegals from crime and it fosters good relations between them and law enforcement. the problem. the sanctuary is for the illegal and not the american citizen. i, for one, am sick and tired of this politically correct nonsense. what is correct about allowing a career criminal who should not have been here in the first place to walk the streets? the facts are real. she was 32. walking with her dad along a san francisco pier. he was a dirt bag illegal career criminal. seven felony convictions, five deportations under his belt. and sheriff ross mercurimi pursuant to his city's guidelines refused to hands him over to the feds and let him

walk the streets instead. the illegal took a gun and shot her dead. before she expired, katherine steinly begged her darksd "help me, help me." but it was too late. sanctuary cities are safe havens for criminal aliens, not their innocent victims. in fact, juan francisco lopez sanchez admitted he came to san francisco because it was a sanctuary. now, let me make one thing clear. we are all of us immigrants and unless you are a native american, but most of us came here pursuant to the rules. in fact, the happiest days for me as both a sitting district attorney and judge were when i welcomed newly naturalized citizens who worked hard to get here and pledged their allegiance to america.

so what to do? i'll tell you what to do. you enforce the law. if a city refuses to comply with federal warrants, they get no federal money. california gets $40 million a year to house criminal illegals until the feds pick them up. that's our money. don't give me this, have a heart, nonsense. americans are the most charitable generous people on the face of the earth and don't you dare ask us to create a zone of lawlessness and ignore the murder of innocent victims so some illegal criminal won't have to go home. now, in true washington style, the feds blame the sheriff and the sheriff blames the mayor and the white house blames the republicans. >> it's because of the political efforts of republicans that we have not been able to make the kind of investment that we would like to make in securing our

border and keeping our communities safe. >> now the obama administration ka blame anyone they want. but they're the ones who reportedly released 30,000 criminal aliens from our jails on to our streets. it was the obama administration in 2012 through an illegal executive action that said, illegal teens could stay and on the heels of that, an influx of 100,000 young people from central america who were then flown on your dime into your neighborhood and if i still haven't convinced you, the president is enforcing his own sanctuary policy. consider this. the department of homeland security reportedly instructed the california criminal illegal, released from jail in 2013 be transferred to san diego and riverside counties. why? because they're sanctuary cities. take a listen from the president's own mouth. >> now, our immigration system

has been broken for a very long time and everybody knows it. >> i'll tell you what's broken, mr. president, the hearts of american families who have lost loved ones at the hands of illegals who repeatedly commit crimes that you let walk the streets. take a look at just a few of the victims' names. and by the way, mr. president, pray tell, what exactly can we afford? more ms-13 gang bangers, more money for social programs? and don't lie to us, mr. president, you were the one who closed down the secure communities program then allowed locals to share illegal fingerprints with the feds. might you be creating more zones of lawlessness for us? and now you simply allow the wholesale rejection of federal law by sanctuary cities and in 2010, your administration openly said, cities that refuse to obey

immigration laws would not be punished. and by the way, folks, can you imagine what the president would do if sanctuary cities refused to enforce civil rights laws, integration laws? the federal response would be sweet, certain and immediate. now, for those of you who want to protect illegals and allow them to cooperate with law enforcement, no sanctuary is needed. the law is already in place. it's called a u shvisa. i used it as district attorney. if you are illegal and you want to report a crime, this visa protects you, allows you and your family, sanctuary, fro deportation. so enough of this benign-sounding sanctuary nonsense that protects illegal criminals. at what point do we say these

killings must ends or are you willing to risk it to protect the criminal illegal? and who would it be okay to lose? your son? your mother? or as mr. steinly did last week, his own daughter, katherine? and that's my open. tell me what you think on my facebook page or twitter #judge seeni jeanine. let's get to form a national co-chair of president obama's re-election campaign and also founder and executive director of the accountability project, mickey, thanks, for joining us is there thanks, for having many e. am i wrong? >> you know, there is -- this was an unthinkable tragedy, obviously, what happened. the reality is mayor guiliani, the crime stopping mayor who

took apart crime in new york city was one of the first enforcers of this sank can you wear city policy. under his own statement, he said, that crime would not have gone down if new york was not a sanctuary city. if those 400 undocumented citizens were unable to feel comfortable in their own city to report crime in their own communities, to be able to take their own children, many of who were illegal to doctors, do prevent disease control, for, you know, it's a part of the community. >> all right. i get it. all right. first of all, the mayor has already said his sanctuary is not the same as san francisco. here's my question. i mentioned a uvisa. have you ever heard of a uvisa? sample not until tonight. >> okay. that's because nobody know what is the uvisa is about. what this is, congress passed a law. >> right. >> allowing anyone who is illegal who can report a crime e crime to not fear deportation. all right.

it's already law. here's the issue. why do we have a sanctuary city for criminals who shouldn't be here in the first place? at some point wouldn't even you had mit that we've got to stop allowing people who shouldn't be here from staying here in faye commit a crime? >> and we don't. the law says we don't. the federal government states that cities, local cities and states have to send these illegals who have committed crimes back to residents or put them in the course. so they are protecting themselves from this. >> are you saying it was okay for san francisco not to hand this guy over to the feds? >> no, that's what happened. >> that's what sanctuarys do. >> no that's not. >> yes, it has. >> from 2003 to 2013, they would house them into municipal jails, basically, which is also a controversial issue. it creates a human rights violation. >> oh, geeze, i'm sorry, maybe they should sends them to jail or deport them. can we agree on one thing? >> yes. >> if they're illegal and they commit a crime and the feds

lodge a detainer warrants. you know what that is? >> yes. >> to hold them. >> correct. >> do the locals have a right to release them and tell the feds, you know, go to hell? >> no, this is a problem where the local governments are not communicating with the federal government. the federal government is backlogged. this is why we need comprehensive reform. >> that's hog wash. this is why the locals should be forced to turn them over to the feds. >> that enforces racial targeting. >> i don't care about racial targeting. i care about someone who is illegal, committing a crime, being responsible and the federal government being listened to. since when does a municipality tell a federal government we're not going to do what you want. >> well, that's not what actually happens. >> yes it is, yes, it is, tell me why i'm wrong. >> not everybody is as reasonable as you, when you start setting policies like that have you some lawmakers and some law enforcement individuals that cake i take it into their hands, i'm from arizona, there is a lot of racial targeting going on is

there we are not talking about racial targeting. we are talking about a man released and the locals told the feds to go to hell, let him walk the streets. as a result of that, they have blood on their hands, he killed an innocent victim. >> if a law enforcement individual thinks it's okay to pull over an individual. i do, they run their background checks. >> if there is a detainer, what you are talking about is a different issue. if a detainer is lodged and some sheriff who by the way pled guilty to domestic violence, i have no respect for this guy, some sheriff says, i'm not giving him to the federal government and he walks, to me, that's against the federal law. he should be removed from office. last word. >> once released from those jails, those local jails, then whose job is it to take that local prisoner to the federal government? >> we gave california $40 million to keep them and take them to the feds and they didn't. we're going to have you back,

thanks, so much. >> thanks, very much, appreciate it. >> all right. earlier, i spoke with republican congressman country dan hunter about his fight defend defund sanctuary cities. >> congressman hunter, thanks, so much for being with us today. the federal government is known for sometime that there are about 200 sank dhu wear cities and they've known this for decades. they also read the newspapers, as we all do. the number of americans being killed at the hands of illegal aliens, but the feds are doing anything about this. they could have done something about this so-called sanctuary policy. are they letting this continue to exist because it is in line with their own philosophy? >> yeah, i'm not sure whether it's, you know, liberals wanting a bigger voting block or republican big business wanting cheap labor, but they are allowing it to exist. i've had a bill that punishes sanctuary cities by withholding federal funding for the last six

years. nobody's paid athings to it until now. it's unfortunate that it takes a tragedy to get attention. there is still no movement in the republican leadership here to do anything about it. you know, we could have passed my bill today and passed it onto the senate. >> would it possibly, congressman, be the reason there wouldn't be movement especially now? >> i don't know. maybe it's the presidential election coming up. they don't want to be seen as anti-immigrants. they don't want to throw another fire brand into the fire on this. i'm not sure what the deal is. something needs to get done. these cities need to get punched in the gut and hit where it hurts. that's in their pocketbooks. >> you know what, they are violating federal law. these sanctuary cities are violating federal law and the kicker is that they are getting federal money to hold illegals for pick up by the feds. so why are they getting millions of dollars to hold illegals if they are sanctuary cities that will not hold illegals.

that's the first place to start. the second place to start is why don't we start some lawsuits? >> but number within you have to look at the department of justice and this administration and the way that they've, they have broken the link in between the federal i-system and our immigration system and the local law enforcement. you have to have that link there. $40 million went to california last year for just what you said and it's going to places like san francisco. they got hundreds of thousands of dollars, but places like san diego got hundreds of thousands of dollars. you have to comply with the federal law to get that money because here's the problem. the money is not coming from san fransicoans, the money is coming from people in oklahoma, kansas, virginia, all over the nation. it's going to cities that are simply disregarding federal law. whose going to cut the funding? it's that simple. >> let's assume the republicans start to realize that americans are angry, we've got this, you know, five times supported,

seven times convicted of felonies, who's killing an innocent woman walking along the pier with her dad. assuming the republicans get in line and look at your bill seriously, the president is going to veto it. right? >> yes, probably. >> so then -- >> that's just the way it is. >> is the safety of americans even an issue for this white house? >>. i mean, look what is happening at the border. the first real problem here is that this guy was deported five times. right? that means he got back across an unsecured border five times. if you don't have a secured border, this is like bailing water out of the boat while there is a giant hole in it. even if we do this stuff and punish sanctuary cities and they get inline, it doesn't stop the massive flow of illegal immigrants, illegal drugs and terrorists across the border. >> congressman. >> who is going to stop that? >> you have been in the military. you understand the first order of government is the protection of its citizens. >> that is not hang now.

what do the american people need to do to change this? >> the american people into ed to realize they elect a commander-in-chief as president. not just somebody who talks about tax law or social justice. we elect a commander-in-chief as president. i think that's what i'm going to be looking at this next election is, i don't really care where the president is going to stand on a flat tax. that's what congress is going to do. that's congress's job. it's the president's job do make sure our allies are supported, our enemies are killed and america remains a safe place. >> let's just hope things clang a little. based on the die lock and the politically correct nonsense we're going through, americans are dying unnecessarily. congressman duncan hunter, thank you so much for being with us. >> thank you. coming up, we've heard from the politicians, so what do people on the street think? do you know you live in a sanctuary city? >> oh, i didn't know that. >> and later i hit the streets of new york do residents even know they live in a sanctuary

city? you may be surprised to see what i found out. next i talk with an immigration attorney and former federal prosecutor who thinks sanctuary cities are actually safe. plus, vote in tonight's insta- poll, should sank shuai wear cities won't report wear cities won't report illegals so t if you're suffering from constipation or irregularity, powders may take days to work. for gentle overnight relief, try dulcolax laxative tablets. ducolax provides gentle overnight relief, unlike miralax that can take up to 3 days. dulcolax, designed for dependable relief.

mexico, i respect the country. they're taking our jobs, they're taking our manufacturing. they're taking our money. they're taking everything and they're killing us on the border. >> that was donald trump, moments ago, doubling down on his illegal immigration stance. this is outrage continues across the country tonight after the senseless murder of 32-year-old katherine steinly by an illegal imgrant who was deported not once, not twice, but five times. with me now imdprax attorney michael wilds, who is an expert in the area of immigration law. michael, you know, you say the san francisco strif didn't do his job and the feds didn't do their job, so what happened? >> well, it all started back in the day, judge, if you pull the lens back, congress, since president reagan hasn't changed

laws and local police who do not have the resource and forensic capability and looking at asylum applications are stuck fighting the war on terrorism. the war on drugs. by the way, on top of everything, we want you to handle the immigration problem. elected officials are sleeping. >> michael, here's the thing the guy was brought to san francisco to be prosecuted on an old warrant t. feds not only launch a detainer the feds say we want to make sure this guy gets book to us, because he's an enforcement priority. i don't need a local cop to do anything. plus we give these dirtbags money to house them. >> and it costs $12.5 manyle to remove them. >> the guy got the money from us. >> the guy had seven felonies, five times deported. look at the resources and the keystone cops, federal law enforcement. >> the keystones cops the sheriff lives in a sanctuary city that doesn't allow him pursuant to their ordinance to hand him over, the san francisco

administrative code, no agency officer, law enforcement shall use city funds or resources to enforce federal immigration. >> judge, i work all day long as an immigration lawyer bringing good people into this country. we're working on the guy that helped save marcus latrell. i helped the shoe bomber, a guy in the 50s. >> they aren't convicted aliens, don't deflate the issue. there are good illegals and bad illegals. >> no criminal immigrant should be on u.s. soil. >> so what do we do with them? >> this is the problem. if you look and your audience looks and this audience looks at the sanctuary city as a band aid t. problem is the border. look, i'm a former mayor and federal prosecutor, there are a handful of us that saw immigration three dimensionally, mayor guiliani, like our current mayor in new york, was mayor of a sanctuary city and respected all the rules of the sanctuary city. >> don't compare guiliani to

deblaz i don't think, they have different tastes. you have a uvisa. i don't need to give everybody a free ride. >> let's talk about the uvisa. it only works when the crime has been committed. you bring somebody to justice. they're backed up now. >> blowny. >> judge, let me ask you a child, the parent came in illegally the morality and breach of our laws is clearly on the parent's shoulder. this poor family is mourning, my heart goes out to thatfully. whose life is more valuable, an immigrant child whose parents believe she might be deported. they won't bring her to a hospital in one of these cities or a woman who is felled by a felon. that felon should be deported and these keystone cops should have gotten rid of him. >> let me tell you something, this has in you can to do with a family that has a kid with medical care. >> they won't go to the hospital there they're not committing

crimes. deflate this whole thing into an emotional -- >> we are agreed. anybody who commits a crime should not be in this country. >> they should have their asse ask thrown out of this country. so don't talk to me about kids in hospitals. >> no one wants to hear those things, judge. the kids, we have 11 million people here, we are not deporting them. >> aren't deporting the criminals. >> we don't have enough handcuffs. >> you hand them over. >> to whom, donald trump? >> to the feds. wilds, thanks, for being with us. more terror threats, stopped by the fbi as recently as the fourth of july, so why is

too late. now back to "justice" with judge jeanine. this is not your grandfather's al qaeda. our job is to look at a haystack the size of this country for needles that are increasingly invisible to us because of

end-to-end encryption. i know i'm giving information to bad people. we cannot break strong encryption. i'm here to tell the american people the tools you are giving us is not working the way you expect them to work in the highest stakes matters. >> new fears tonight after fbi director jim comey's clear and dire warning, the fbi does not have the tools it needs to protect us in this new age of terror. joining me now former fbi investigator bill daily. director comey not so conversation. you? >> actually, i think director comey is saying what it is. i think it's a matter of confidence. it's a matter of telling us, listen, we are dealing with aggressive parties out there. people are adversaries are using technology to their advantage and our disadvantage. he is basically having a call to arms saying listen if you want us to do the job right, you better give us those tools, access with warrants to go get the information quickly and

decisively. >> bill, hang on. >> yes, judge. >> since when does this, we're talking about isis now? >> we're speaking primarily of isis, that's what the director is referring to. >> a year ago, there were 800 of them. now there are more sophisticated technologically than we are, they are more broken power? what are they doing? i thought they were in the desert building a caliphate. >> as people might think they are. i want to tell you that they have people out there who are using not just the marketing techniques that you would expect from a madison avenue group of firms, you also have people out there with the technology that it would seem like it's coming from the european version of silicon valley. these people are out there tweeting, not just from one place, judge, they're tweeting from a number of places, once they get someone on the hook, interested, they bring them to the dark side of the internet and encrypt it. >> let me ask you this, why don't we shut down not just the

sites, you know, but our tech companies such as google working with us? >> well, they are working with us, but, well, the idea of shutting down those people who are tweeting out some of the information, certainly, that is a goal. another goal, judge, is sometimes keeping those things opened. it allows the fbi and other intelligence actions to piggy on that, see who is out there, who they're talking to, at the right time, they'd like to take them out. >> i know jim comey. he's an honest guy, a food man. >> absolutely. >> when he says that we can't access that encrypted information, i mean, we don't have the skills, so keeping them up doesn't matter, because we can't read or listen to what they're saying. >> well, you may not be able to read or listen to what they're saying at that time. sometimes having information, judge, after it's been we'll say stored, you may have the ability to encrypt later on, to see

en-to-end who is communicateing generally. you may not see what they are saying, it allows you to understand where chatter is going on, where it may be emanateing from and the parties may be here in the u.s. allows you to conduct an investigation. he's right, cryptography going back to the enigma box in world war ii is far beyond anything like that today. these people are using that to their advantage. >> let's hope that congress gives them what he needs. bill daly, thanks, so much for being with us. >> thank you, judge. you heard right here the threat of terror is not going away, in fact, you can argue it's getting worse. so why is the obama administration cutting some 40,000 troops from the u.s. army? i asked congressman duncan hunter that very question. >> this president does not believe in american military might. it's that simple. you have probably one of the worst commander-in-chiefs we've had in the last two decades. the world has fallen apart around our ears. if you look around the world right now, it's a crazy place,

it's not safe for americans to go, in parts of europe, asia, the radical islamists are starting to run wild and this president does not care. >> joining my now to talk more about all this is retired u.s. army leiutenant general tony schaeffer is there hi, judge. >> how does 40,000 troops protect the americans? >> well, it's not a good sign. as the congressman alluded to, there is real threats everywhere. the general testified to the fact he listed his top five. you know, russia, china, ian, they're all actors on the world stage and what frightens me, judge, is that as congress pointed out, this president has not tasked the pentagon to shape the force to be effective globally. instead, he's slashing randomly to include skillsets which are necessary to actually do the war on terror, things like military police, signals folks as well as logistics folks, all of which have to enable our allies do their job. this is a very bad sign and it

frankly shows the pittsburgh is fought being forced to do its due diligence and do what's necessary to cut critical things, can you cut things, you can cut generals, staffs, but you shouldn't be cutting into the muscle that has to do the work. >> tony, we have roughly 1700,000 civilian personnel. >> right. >> in the dod. >> right. >> why, and i don't want anyone to lose their job. >> i'm with you. don't mention other areas. >> why the troops as opposed to the civilian personnel? >> excellent question. i'm with you. we have more civilians now in the pentagon in dod tan we did during the high watermark of the cold war. it's completely insane. i and others and members of congress have head, you can safely cut through attritions i experienced if '87 in the reagan draw down, he did cuts successfully without diminishing our ability. >> when reagan was in office. >> exactly. he had a planl. they were executing that plan based on the strategy.

we don't have a global strategy. so we can safely cut certain areas, you point out. civilians are the prime target. they should be reduced. >> that is a safe area. generals staffs, generals should be cut. we don't ice as many as we did back in the cold war. >> let's talk about what comey said. he didn't have the tools that he needed. we the united states, the most technolookically advanced nation the most powerful nation, allegedly, supposedly, hopefully, and they're beats us on this encryption stuff. what does he need, tony? >> he needs two things. he needs strong human intelligence. cia and dia should be out penetrating the networks, doing what we have done since the beginning of time. clandestined human intelligence. i feel his pain. but the encryption piece is only one piece of it, judge. we're not being aggressive in special operations forces, if you recall about a month ago, we did it to attempt a capture of

abu saef. >> that intelligence helps comey physical out what networks are penetrating the united states. when you do both, physical out how they're communicating. no doubt, they know how we are communicating because of the snowden compromises. but we have to do the hard work of espionage in penetrating those networks. >> this last question, joe dunnford, is he better than dempsey? >> i have every everything that general dunford has two things the best i seen in officers in 20 years. he said he is not afraid to tell the truth as he understands it. >> they all say that. but here's the qui, tony, given the fact that they all say that, at least you've got comey who is going to congress and saying, i don't have the tools and i need the money. will this guy do what needs to be done to protect americans? do you believe he will? >> i believe everything i know about joe dunford, his nickname, fighting joe, indicates to me he will fight with a strategy that's effective and fight for

the resources he needs. >> let's hope so. >> to be successful and keep us protected. >> leiutenant schaefer, thank you for being with us. >> thanks, judge. next, we're back on the big topic. sanctuary cities. do you know you even live in one? i found a lot of people who

>> sanctuary cities. we have been talking about them throughout the area. would you even know if you lived in one before it was too late? this week i hit the streets of new york city. yep the big apple is a sanctuary city. i asked residents about that, about kate steinly's murder in san francisco and whether they feel safe. do you know what a sanctuary

city is? >> ah, no. >> do you know what a sanctuary city is? >> no. >> the sanctuary city is where the locals decide illegal immigrants will not be turned over to the feds, even if the feds say they want them. is that right or wrong? >> hmm, let me think about this for a couple second. >> do you know what a sanctuary city is? >> no. >> new york is a sanctuary city. >> yeah. >> you know what that means? >> yeah, vaguely. >> it sounds like a city that doesn't exercise extradition treaty. >> it puts us more in harm's way because there is no accountability to the person committing the crime? >> are you in agreement they should hand over these dangerous criminals? >> to the feds? >> oh, that's a toughy. >> no it isn't. >> morally, america is a country founded on the premise of the melting pot. >> the melting pot is based upon people getting visas and coming

here legally. >> legally, of course, is wrong. morally, i can definitely see why the idea behind the sanctuary city is popular. >> if a woman is killed by an illegal not turned over to the feds, by a sank chu area city who is at fault if that guy kills a 30-year-old victim and kills her. >> i would say the city is responsible. he shot her on the street. >> that's san francisco and new york is the same way. do you feel safe? >> i keep myself safe. >> i bet you do. >> do you feel safe? >> no, i don't. a lot of criminals out here. they shoot people and they're criminals, they should be sent back where they belong, not here. >> i feel i'd have to know more about this. >> what do you need to know the woman is dead, he was illegal, he shouldn't have been here, they protected him. >> it's all that people die. >> it's the city's fault. >> do you know you live in a sank can you area city? >> oh, i didn't know that.

>> this guy was deported five times, he kept coming back. >> how did they let him in? crazy. >> does that make you feel safe? >> someone shot someone and someone wasn't supposed to be here. >> would you agree that if the guy were not here, he could cannot have shot the 32-year-old woman? yes or no? >> yeah. >> that's the answer to the question. you have to follow the law and he wouldn't have been on the street. so you think it's wrong. >> >> absolutely. >> okay. >> do you feel safe in new york as a sanctuary city? >> no. >> what should we do? >> clahange the mayor. >> we want to point out the mayor of new york city is democrat bill deblasio, we invited him on tonight's show, his office declined. but with me now is the director of policy studies at the center of immigration studies jessica vaughan. good evening, jessica.

do americans. >> hi. >> -- live in sank dc sanctuary have reason to be concerned? >> we found leaking at ice records this incident in san francisco was not an isolated one. it's happened before. it's happening all over the country where the local sheriffs are letting people go instead of handing them over to ice. you know, this is more tragedys waiting to happen all over the country. >> well, you know, jessica, your immigration studies, you said that there were some 8100 deportable aliens released after their arrest by sanctuary jurisdictions in an eight-month period and almost 2,000 were arrested on 7500 charges. look, i believe that the local cop, the cop on the beat wants to arrest these people but their bosses won't let them. why? >> that's exactly right.

most of these sanctuary policies are imposed on the law enforcement agencies by local politicians who seem to be more worried about, you know, protecting illegal aliens from deportation and currying favor with certain special interest groups than they are about protecting the public from the illegal imgrants who are here and have been arrested and committing crimes. so you know, they have it backwards. they should be more worried about protecting the public. it's ice, the reality of immigration enforcement today is that the obama administration is only going after the worst of the worst. so if there is somebody that ice actually says they want, they ought to get out of the way and turn them over to i.c.e. you know, it's got to be somebody who meets the minimal priorities of the administration. so this is a reckless policy. >> would you agree the only way to stop this, because the obama administration, they said in 2010, we're not going after the

sanctuary cities who won't follow federal orders. the only way to stop it is to stop giving money to actually house these prisoners who were supposed to be turned over to the feds, but also it's to make sure that these sanctuary cities are required to follow the federal law? >> right. it's -- there's two parts it to. one is as you said, it needs to be clarified in federal law that this is something that they must do. they must honor all detainers issued by i.c.e. assistance gra, from burn funding. from anything that comes out of department of homeland security if they don't comply. >> we're hearing homeland security is suggesting they be sent to sanctuary cities. i have one final question. could this had been prevented had everyone followed federal law? >> yes. >> no question in my mind.

this guy should have been turned over. >> thanks for being with us tonight. you do great work. thank you. it's your last chance to vote. should sanctuary cities that should sanctuary cities that won't yes, we are twins. when i went on to ancestry, i just put in the name of my parents and my grandparents. i was getting all these leaves and i was going back generation after generation. you start to see documents and you see signatures of people that you've never met. i mean, you don't know these people, but you feel like you do. you get connected to them. i wish that i could get into a time machine and go back 100 years, 200 years and just meet these people. being on ancestry just made me feel like i belonged somewhere. discover your story. start searching for free now at ancestry.com.

and forthe results. we ask should sanctuary cities exist? they help police without fear of deportation. many positives that aren't being mentioned. have you been listening to me? would you rather protect the real victim with the u visa or every other criminal in a sanctuary town. these cities should no longer receive federal funding. the state should feed and clothe these people on their own if they want them. they ask for them, they got them. mckenzie says congressman hunter have bills addressing these

issues taking away their money. he says the cities are not to blame. the san francisco shooting could have happened anywhere. do you have a sister? would you feel the same if kathryn was your sister? that's it for us. you don't have to miss justice. set your dvr and tell your friends to do the same. remember to friend me on facebook and follow me on twitter. see you next week, same time, same place. same me. i'll be here. person.

>> and molly is in for julie banderas approximate. >> i am molly line. we begin with the race 2016 and immigration once again on from stage. donold trump who has been under fire for weeks speaking in two events. a live look right here at trump speaking at phoenix. going unscripted in both speeches. he took time to clarify his stance on illegal immigration. >> i love the mexican people and i love the spirit of the mexican people. i love them. many, many people from