"outnumbered" starts now. >> this is "outnumbered". kennedy, co host of fox and friends first, easily earhart is that, fox business network the elizabeth macdonald and-tad one lucky guy also from fox business, we have three, a kennedy, easily and i are "outnumbered". you were supposed to be "outnumbered" but now we are. this general is taking over. if you don't have its demand it.

>> everybody has got it. >> let's get to some other business. what difference 24 hours makes, one day after refusing to apologize for using a private e-mail server when she was secretary of state the democratic front runner now changing her tune. in an interview with abc news hillary offering the start of a string of map called thes falling what is called a summer of missteps and purple numbers in free fall. >> i should have these two accounts, one for personal, one for work related, that was a mistake. i am sorry about that. i take responsibility and i'm trying to be as transparent as i possibly can. >> apparently won apology was not enough. >> everybody in the government i communicated with, a lot of this people knew i was using a personal e-mail but i am sorry that it has raised all of these questions.

i take responsibility for having made what is clearly not the best decision. >> third time is the time. later on facebook and twitter hillary apologized again saying, quote, yes, i should have used two e-mail addresses, one for personal matters and one for my work at the state department, not doing so was the mistake. i am sorry about it and i take full responsibility. if i spill coffee on your nose i would say is that was a mistake that this was going out of her way to set up an illegal server that led to a lot massive massive potential national security breach of epic proportions. >> you get to the point which is why did she do it? because she was worried about conflict of interest showing up in her e-mails when she was running for president. we all know why she did it. wasn't a mistake, she did it on purpose, she wanted to have control of her e-mails. if they were in the public's fear she would not have control of them this this is like i am

sorry because i was taught. not like i am sorry i did something bad that i should never have -- no. i am sorry that i -- she did it on purpose for a reason. i am guessing at her motive. we don't have absolute proof of her motive but look of a conflict of interest with the clinton foundation, different people she was communicating with as secretary of state she shouldn't have been because they were contributing to her family foundation, i think that is why the e-mail was set up in the first place and not to mention the lies about it, the fact that there was no classified stuff, all this stuff that was said that wasn't true. >> so many lives she has given and been caught in up to this point and this is in going on for months and she has been strident, said in a no apology, sunday no apology, we found lots of classified information, i am sorry. bill clinton is telling her this

is your last chip to play, you got to say i am sorry because what you're doing is not working and he said i am sorry, people turned to him and loved him and supported him, you got to do this, sound remorseful. she said she still calculated, she said i am sorry for raising questions, didn't mean to call all of this attention but never did she say i am sorry for putting the country in jeopardy, i am sorry for the lives lost during benghazi and maybe that could have been or was my fault. you never heard her apologize to those family members or the men and women like your son who are fighting for our country and she is putting them in jeopardy by sending e-mails. >> that is why it makes a difference. >> a couple things here, one is the same playbook where she is talking about a tax and distraction. was secretary of state, classified information, assume

she sent and received classified information because that is one of the unknown factors. my concern is cheap is using one e-mail system, one e-mail address to send 30,000 personal e-mails to people who have her e-mail address and that means 30,000 e-mails could be a blueprint to the same address with which she is using to send classified information. that in and of itself is the security breach i don't know how you would define it. >> the apology never went -- like saying if i hurt your feelings i am sorry you feel that way. instead of taking responsibility, when she says she is trying to be transparency isn't. it is another lot. >> it may be beyond a point of no return because why is she apologizing now? poll numbers are dropping and the owners are complaining and taking this narrow play, there is no human levy, no remorse

over what happened and by the way no discussion of e-mails were deleted. the clintons of taken legalistic positions with cagy wording and did it too with the apology about supporting the iraq war. the same thing over and over. dave: there was one thing, another misstatement where she says it was totally above board, lot of questions about that, everybody in the government communicated knew i was using a personal e-mail. last week we have this state department e-mail, it doesn't appear the they know we have this and yesterday she said everybody knew she had it. >> it is more talking down to the american people, making us feel inferior for asking what happened, how did you put the country at risk? >> using of trouble if she was sending and receiving classified information. the intelligence community inspector general has said that

over and over and we see even more. she is in enough trouble fair. it was classified information that she destroyed. that is a new batch where she will find yourself at the bottom. >> it wasn't a simple mistake, it was a deliberate action she took. by the way we are paying for that new transparencies are, it is costing us extra money for her mistake. she should be sorry for that too. in the meantime looks like hillary clinton's e-mail scandal is having an impact on her own stomping grounds would secretary of state appointing janet jacobs to transparency coordinator. essentially an e-mail czar in charge of improving transparency as the agency struggles to overcome archaic records practices and for handling of public records. state department spokesman admitting the position was created in part due to the intense public attention to clinton's e-mails. we're also learning the agency plans to move about 50 workers

into temporary jobs to help the office sift through her e-mail. as i just mentioned, an awful waste of our money coming from the administration did pledge to be among the most transparent. >> a time we need the workers to track where is isis, who are the refugees coming into europe and all sorts of problems, we need those, not tracking hillary's e-mail controversy. i don't think czars have to testify before congress but setting that aside, there's the question about whether the new czar made a campaign donation to hillary clinton. that is coming. >> to meet this looks more and more like an administration wide coverage. they are trying to take action. john kerry trying to take action to look like they're doing something instead of the action they should take and that is calling her into the fbi and interrogating her and applying

the same penalty general david petraeus had. anything else would look like special treatment. dave: one thing that is bothering everybody in the white house and the hillary campaign is what happened last week when catherine heritage got information from sources in the state department, who hate the fact that politics intruded on what is supposed to be free from politics, dealings with other countries. clearly it wasn't that way when secretary of state hillary clinton was in power and they are talking, whistle-blowers in the state department. no evidence of this but this may be an attempt to put a cap on the whistle-blowers, speaking to fox news last week this is an attempt to shut them up. >> take the lives the side, she was in over head in this job. >> she could not handle the responsibility and function of secretary of state, how shall we move into higher office? >> for the information crossing

her e-mail and her desk. if you have an e-mail system that is not set up for classified information you were not doing your job. she wasn't able to get the critical national security she needed as secretary of state. she was the head of the state department, the country's chief diplomat and you are telling me she was unable, incapable of getting vital information? set aside the conspiracy theory is that very easy to craft right now, that alone speaks to growth in confidence. if you can cancel the state department how will you handle the white house in your own administration. she wasn't listening to national security advisor isn't serious issues like libya, she was listening to a nestle, he was getting information about tv times and skim milk and tea and she is a very not serious person when you look at the e-mails put forward and i have to say maybe it is better to not have her be the first female president because i don't want as women to

have to defend somebody who is so incompetent in the highest office if she would win. >> this is 2015. what surprises me is they're just now hiring someone to monitor e-mails from the state department. this is not some mom-and-pop sub sandwich shop in the middle of south carolina. this is the state department. why are we just hiring someone to monitor e-mails? this should never have happened. we should stop this absolutely but i can't believe we have gotten to this point. it is ridiculous the we are having this conversation. >> days after clinton's aides said she plans to show more heart this fall the democratic front runner all tear it up in a tv interview. what got to her and whether a mainstream news anchor would ask a republican the same question. plus, now that kim davis is out of jail new questions about religious exemptions on the job. should there be a more accommodation or more of accommodations for people of faith or to public servants have

to follow the law no matter what? right after the show, join us for "outnumbered" overtime. harris is not here but i am doing it this week. foxnews.com/"outnumbered," start tweeting your questions and comments, the chat will be on fire like it was yesterday. fire them away. but managing my symptoms was all i was doing. so when i finally told my doctor, he said humira is for adults like me who have tried other medications but still experience the symptoms of moderate to severe crohn's disease. and that in clinical studies, the majority of patients on humira saw significant symptom relief. and many achieved remission. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas

where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. if you're still just managing your symptoms, ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible. i brought in some protein to help rearrange the fridge and get us energized! i'm new ensure active high protein. i help you recharge with nutritious energy and strength to keep you active.

come on pear, it's only a half gallon. i'll take that. yeeeeeah! new ensure active high protein. 16 grams of protein and 23 vitamins and minerals. all in 160 calories. ensure. take life in. iflike i love shrimp, red lobster's endless shrimp...

...is kind of a big deal. it's finally back, with as much shrimp as you want, any way you want 'em. one taste of these new pineapple habanero coconut shrimp bites, and i already want more. they even brought back wood-grilled teriyaki shrimp! yeah, you heard me: teriyaki. and really: what's not to love about... ...buttery garlic shrimp scampi? here, the sweet, spicy, crispy possibilities are as endless as the shrimp. and yeah, they're endless, but they won't last forever.

>> the kentucky clerk who was jailed to failing to issue same-sex marriage licenses is free but her legal battle is raising the question about religious exemption, something more must be done to make accommodations for people of faith or we will see more incidents just like hers. how has this been handled in the great state of kentucky? >> on the one hand she went to jail for her beliefs, good for her, that is a hard thing to do, it is never easy to go to jail even for a couple days but on father handed is like the non-violent resistance we saw in the civil rights movement, not to compare with martin luther king that he did that sort of thing and she's doing that sort of thing, is she a martyr? is she a great hero? i would not say so.

good for her for standing up for her beliefs but you have to follow the law if you are in that position and she wasn't. if you disagree with the lie you can either quit or go to jail, she decided to go to jail, takes a strong amount of gumption to do that but is she a hero? i don't think so. >> we are in a dangerous the free flow of legally but politically it is very interesting. what to people like mike huckabee and ted cruz get out of making this their call? >> they are trying to to shore up the evangelical base, religious voters. i am not sure this is the best way to do it. this is different than the hobby lobby case. she took an oath, she is part of the government and it is her job to follow the law. by doing what she's doing she is rewriting the law and she does not have a right. i say this as a christian, she does not have a right to unilaterally decide who gets married and to doesn't a unilaterally rewrite the law. i think of christians are going

to fight they need to find the cases that are on the ground like the hobby lobby case and as conservatives the politics of this is a need to stay focused on issues where it really matters. we have to be careful because we are criticizing a lawless road administration, i don't like when the right becomes hypocrites'. we have to be consistent. if you're going to criticize the administration for not following the law you can defend someone because she is on your side. >> seems like they're doing a bit of obstructing. where do we go from here? where does either side go from here? >> back to this case the law already says, she should have asked to be transferred sheet and want to do the job. the law has sensible accommodations in the civil rights act and says we can accommodate your religious conviction so long as it doesn't presented to hard should your boss meaning you can get transferred to another job. that is what she could have

asked for and the problem is she would not let clerks each marriage licenses to same-sex couples even if those clerks were saying to themselves this is my religious conviction, to give these individuals licenses. >> maybe there's a compromise they can reach in this situation? i respect her and understand if she has a religious belief, she feels convicted about it and doesn't want to go against her religion she shouldn't have to be forced and should not have to be forced to get another job. >> she could be transferred and not issue licenses. >> maybe there's a compromise within the agency. even if she doesn't want other people to stab her name as an elected official on the marriage licenses may be her second in command who does agree with that and has no problem. >> won't lead and do that. >> there should be a compromise where she doesn't have a choice. she doesn't want -- you don't have to do it but your second-in-command, they don't have a problem with it.

dave: and it totally superficial? why is she a democrat? can anybody figured that out? >> where does it end? what if it is a scientologist who says i will not grant a marriage license to someone i know is -- >> what if it is a christian who doesn't believe in divorce? or what if it is someone who won't issue a gun permit who doesn't believe in the second amendment? you have to be careful. she cannot, what she is doing, she does not have that power at. >> it is not a law because it is convenient for you because you agree with someone. there is freedom of religion and freedom of expression absolutely. >> this might propel her into public speaking, she could be hired as a speaker forelock pro-life groups or christian organizations, she could make a lot of money doing that, this could propel her to do something where she has a voice and

attract more people. >> interesting case. now we move to a rally on capitol hill in opposition as to the iran nuclear deal, kickoff at the top of the hour, why this may still matter even as it appears the president has the votes to secure the deal. plus donald trump and jeb bush, the reaction to the donald's latest attack video. can. take the high road here. we will discuss.

welcome to fort green sheets. welcome to castle bravestorm. it's full of cool stuff, like... my trusty bow. and free of stuff i don't like. we only eat chex cereal. no artificial flavors, and it's gluten-free. mom, brian threw a ball in the house!

it's the brand more doctorsose recommend for minor arthritis pain. plus, just two aleve can last all day. you'd need 6 tylenol arthritis to do that. aleve. all day strong. you premium like clockwork. month after month. year after year. then one night, you hydroplane into a ditch. yeah... surprise... your insurance company tells you to pay up again. why pay for insurance if you have to pay even more for using it? if you have liberty mutual deductible fund™, you could pay no deductible at all. sign up to immediately lower your deductible by $100. and keep lowering it $100 annually, until it's gone. then continue to earn that $100 every year. there's no limit to how much you can earn

and this savings applies to every vehicle on your policy. call to learn more. switch to liberty mutual and you could save up to $509. call liberty mutual for a free quote today at see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance. >> welcome back to "outnumbered". president obama likely set for another major foreign policy win on the iran nuclear deal despite major opposition from congressional republicans as the effort to kill it is still going strong. donald trump and ted cruz teaming up today with other conservatives for an anti-nuclear deal rally on the lawn of the capital, this as new

polls show just 21% of americans approve of the agreement and house majority leader kevin mccarthy is accusing the president of playing politics with american lives. >> for 13 years iran will get a nuclear weapon. okayed by america. in 13 years is not that far away. 14 years ago was 9/11. they test their icbms, inter-continental, not to shoot at israel but to come after america. you don't need a majority to pass it, he's trying to hold onto a simple majority of the minority of one party to a poll of veto. that is a long way to make foreign policy in america. >> iran's supreme leader saying his country will no longer enter enter talks with the united states outside the nuclear deal. reiterating that it remains the great satan. celestes kevin mccarthy said we

are rubberstamp thing and iran nuclear weapon and giving them money to do it and opening up their economy to allow more money. >> iran's leaders continue to ratchet up rhetoric saying we will continue to support terrorist groups like hezbollah and reports are crossing the wires reported lead that russia is test driving nuclear delivered devices on drone submarine so robotic submarines, checking out coastal waters, not even 13 years, one or two years from now we will see what a rotten deal this was. >> they have already broken the deal. if you read the reports, the ayatollah has said we don't have to follow this. >> i don't speak farsi but i know the term the great satan is not a compliment. i know what obama is doing, winding up the clock waiting until he is gone and he knows a republican president is elected that president will tinker with

the deal and when it goes to hell in the middle east president obama will blame republicans. >> like that this deal in the first place? >> he wants to bolster his legacy, have a little paragraph in his closing state of the union address where he bids the country high five and farewell and says look of all i have done, unemployment is negative 15%, we're best friends with iran thanks to my constituents. dave: this is not a deal. this is a treaty. we used to have arms control treaties, this is an arms control treaty. it is supposed to pass with supermajority in the senate. this is an approval rating by the approval rating, going outside the constitution, to pass this treaty as constitutional bothers me gets under my skin ended should get under the skin of the 78% of the american people who don't like

it. >> brought that out during the commercial break, why would these politicians and he mentioned hillary clinton support something that is a widely unpopular? >> why would you support a deal where only 21% of the country is for, the majority of the people, what you are reading in that poll 49% against it. you were being voted on by the american people, donald trump number going because he is speaking against ideas like this. he is agreeing with the american people giving them what the american people want. that is why they are voting for him. hillary clinton's number that down and she is speaking in washington saying she is for this deal, a 21% of americans, and -- >> maybe she will apologize for that. >> another apology. so much for donald trump's attacks on jeb bush, the latest salvo of play on the donald's did that jeb is a low energy

guy. take a look. >> have trouble sleeping at night, too much energy, needs and low energy? >> some companies don't. the norm ought to be jeb bush. >> that video getting this response on fox and friend this morning. >> donald trump won't get elected by disparaging people by attacking people. that is not how you win. you lift people's spirits to be president of the united states. this approach of saying someone is an idiot or low energy. >> aims to civility, but from and the bush camp's dueling attack videos last week. jab, god love him, says the american people don't want it but every time from this on the attack, numbers coin.

>> governor mike huckabee would be up 50 points if that were the case. people don't necessarily want civility. they want this court and chaos and outsiders and their standing in a way of governor bush's coronation. >> team lead from talked-about what the people want at that rally. let's play a sound bite. >> i am a nice person but who cares? a woman came up to me and said i am not sure you are nice enough to be president. i said you know what? this is not going to be an election based on a nice person. it will be based on a competent person. we are tired of the nice people. so i won on the economy, i won on jobs, i won and leadership, all these categories, we do need nice, we need confidence.

>> i want nice when i'm talking to the lady at wal-mart, don't necessarily need that from the president but we ask that point. we need someone who will stand up for what americans really want, the majority of americans want. to defend jeb bush on the morning show he went on to say that lady has been a follower of his for a long time, she got up and 4:00 a.m. she is a mother, working as well and was just fired and following him for a long time. i don't think one at with a woman falling asleep causes and not to vote for someone. >> when you put your soccer to sleep is a bad time. >> handle it in a different way. if i word jeb i would have run into the fox and friends to the undoing cartwheeled and jumping jacks making jokes about it. the problem is not falling asleep but his numbers of gone down can there is a perception he is low energy and playing mr. nice guy and in politics you have to go negative. the nice guy doesn't always --

>> ronald reagan was a nice guy but he had energy. >> the reagan museum, did you see what he ran at a reagan museum, in that room of all the people attacking ronald reagan, the favored exhibits in you see the ayatollah, you don't see it. >> everyone knows politics is like jumping into a pool of live hair dryers. that is what it is. people don't want civility at a time we are in such a crisis in so many levels, they don't want passionate debate cutoff. that is why donald trump is connecting. this reminds me talking of civility reminds me of walter mondale, talking about we need more civility and people are getting be headed. they are cutting off the heads of women and children and we had six years of battling and apologizing. >> what makes me sick is i hear

people say the problem is people don't talk to each other, they don't get along. i don't want them to get along. i want somebody to say this is not working. this is not working. we need to do something different. i don't care if you don't get along. >> i don't want them to get along when they are not getting along in washington they are not spending money and that benefits all of us. donald trump is refreshing when i was in iowa, talked a lot of people supporting him, he is saying what they want to say but he will never say on camera. >> is dead finish? >> has a lot of money. hillary's campaign did promise she would show more courage human side of the democratic front runner getting all emotional in a nationally televised interview. what prompted this? for many, a similar moment in her last, up next. rica, people.. ...are taking charge of their type 2 diabetes... ...with non-insulin victoza®. for a while, i took a pill to lower my blood sugar. but it didn't get me to my goal.

so i asked my doctor about victoza®. he said victoza® works differently than pills. and comes in a pen. victoza® is proven to lower blood sugar and a1c. it's taken once a day, any time. victoza® is not for weight loss, but it may help you lose some weight. victoza® is an injectable prescription medicine that may improve blood sugar in adults... ...with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. it is not recommended as the first medication to treat diabetes and should not be used in people... ...with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. victoza® has... ...not been studied with mealtime insulin. victoza® is not insulin. do not take victoza® if you have a personal or family history of medullary thyroid cancer... multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to victoza®... ...or any of its ingredients. symptoms of a serious allergic reaction may include itching... ...rash, or difficulty breathing. tell your doctor if you get a lump or swelling in your neck.

serious side effects may happen in people who take victoza®, including... ...inflammation of the pancreas (pancreatitis). stop taking victoza® and call your doctor right away... ... if you have signs of pancreatitis, such as severe pain that will not go away... ...in your abdomen or from your abdomen to your back, with or without vomiting. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take and if you have any medical conditions. taking victoza® with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. the most common side effects are headache, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney problems. if your pill isn't giving you the control you need... ...ask your doctor about... ...non-insulin victoza®. it's covered by most health plans.

>> welcome back to "outnumbered" and back to hillary clinton's sit down with abc news in which for the first time hillary clinton apologizes for her e-mail but the interview did take an emotional turn when mrs. clinton was asked about the rigors of the campaign. listen. >> is there ever an instance when you ask yourself why am i doing this again? >> yes. of course. it really is hard and it is something that just demands everything. physically, emotionally, spiritually, it is just 24/7. i cherish and love this country. it gave me opportunities are better than anything my mother or father could have had. >> let's take it to andrea. hillary cried in 2008. remembers that? she doesn't want the country to backslide as it did under george w. bush. is the strategic riding?

calculated or is it real? >> i don't want to criticize her for crying about her mom who passed away because as someone who lost a parent i can cry on, and certain days if someone brings up my parents that it is odd that she breaks down in tears when she seems to be in political trouble. last time she cried in new hampshire was when she was up against the law and she broke stunning tee years in new hampshire town hall, she later went on to win. i don't know whether it was genuine or not but when she talks about her mom a and you look historically, she pulled a couple wise and she told america her mom was a child of immigrants, that wasn't true. term on named her after sir edmund hillary, that also was a lot. she told a number of lies that are pretty easily verifiable about her mom. i don't think bringing up your mom is going to work in this interview. i don't think that will get her out of her political -- >> we cry about our moms but i understand why she would cry about her mom but does it work?

this interview? dave: if it was calculated americans do have the good -- we can't say -- bs meter. i don't think it had that much effect one way or the other and i think as andrew was saying when you have a parent who is that you get emotional. you get emotional without thinking about it. the acre was criticized for asking a softball question that led to the motion but i don't think he should be criticized because a lot of bankers look for emotion out of someone they are interviewing. they do it in a manipulative way. >> i think it depends as you were saying on the politician or the person and their history. if you look at joe biden he lost his son and he could get on stage and say i am not sure i will run for office, my family's going through a hard time and he could cry and we would feel the emotion with him and understand that but when she cries, everything she put our country through, tell lies we caught her

in, the fact that her house of cards is crumbling now it doesn't make it seem genuine or sincere. >> i feel terrible asking if it is calculated strategic crying. i didn't want to ask that question. >> i don't think her crying is strategic. i think she is expressing genuine emotion. what is calculated is the question, her campaign coordinated, and i don't know, i can only speculate but i think the timing of the question and the interviewer interesting considering she is down ten points in one month at joe biden in the same month has gone up ten points. i think her campaign is in real trouble and her campaign manager, his spokesperson came to the new york times and said she will have more heart and humor and here it is on display. >> who does this work for? who does this resonate with? >> women, talking about her mom but you have to raise a question mark, talking about my mom's in

a row, and chelsea's wedding, that as a former political strategists to resonate with women voters, bringing up her mom and we have seen e-mails about the funeral, the yoga or the wedding so you got to shake your head. john boehner, you ask about little river band and he starts crying. i don't know if you can do that. >> is she getting the on the point of no return? are more people saying wait a second i am having doubts? dave: most people here have been saying that for a while but monday or tuesday david axelrod that sweet that he came out with, he wasn't convinced there was a big new york times washington post piece about how she was going to be more emotion and hit the large stream of most american voters, big democrat helped at obama, he wasn't convinced, he thought it was fakery. if democrats, real establishment democrats are saying that i

think she is -- >> you say we will use more heart and three days later she turned on the water works you look and -- >> the question he asked, is your mother's voice in your ear and give me one line you repeat yourself, he knows what that line is, they had that conversation already. >> we ask donald trump the same question. >> i would like to see him try. >> next up, one high school feeling its cheerleaders are going out of bounds in their attempt to rally school spirit. telling the team their uniforms violate the school dress code so should the girls be cut some slack or are other rules black-and-white?

did you know that meeting your daily protein needs actually helps to support your muscle health? boost® high protein nutritional drink can help you get the protein you need. each serving has 15 grams of protein to help maintain muscle, plus 26 vitamins and minerals including calcium

and vitamin d to support strong bones. boost® high protein is the #1 selling high protein complete nutritional drink and it has a great taste-guaranteed! help get the nutrition you need everyday with boost® high protein. join the club at brandpower.com.

>> more out number the moment but first to jenna lee for our 2 of "happening now". jenna: republicans pulled back from a vote of disapproval on the iran nuclear deal at least for now. in the house no word on what the next move is but looking increasingly unlikely, we will be watching that. donald trump bent ted cruz

speaking at an anti iran deal rally in washington. that will kick off the top of 1:00 p.m.. we are also awaiting big news from apple set to unveil the i phone and tablet. we will monitor that as well. >> this does not smell like teen spirit at one isil in new mexico where cheer leaders are being banned from wearing their uniforms to class on game day. the outfits don't meet the school dress code. officials say the skirts are too short, shirts can't be sleeveless, cheerleaders were disappointed. >> a lot of teachers have been complaining about how we are not allowed to wear skirts to school because they're too shortly >> we were spandex under the missile is like shorts under our skirts. and change into our uniforms to perform and change out of them. >> that is an outrage. the rules are the rules.

>> it will be informed. >> that is absolutely heartless. cheerleading, i have had this debate over the years, cheerleading is clearly a sport their sport at school, building team spirit, spirit for the entire student body then why should they be shunned? >> 9 remember the cheerleaders in high school, lot were my friends, they were wearing short cheerleading skirts on game day and i never had a problem with it but look, the school thinks it is distracting, tell not to where the spirits. >> they are now worried about distracting girls lose their worried about distracting us. >> it has been going on for decades. i remember them being short. if they think it is a distraction and there are issues happening i am not in the school, i don't know. where a lot your skirt. such an honor to be a tear. i love wearing my uniform to school. it didn't change my decisions.

always terrified of boys, scared to kiss a boy. >> they were proud of you. >> bet they were. i don't know. i think this is ridiculous. if you have a big problem with it, make these turtle longer. not fair to let the boys wear their uniforms to school on game day. >> i got to say. >> they're banning -- flash -- >> ladies -- >> the men. >> it is the guys, hot and bothered. the point is when you are a 15-year-old boy which none of you have been before, any woman in one of those saudi arabia now fit to distract you. >> uppercut to school? >> i can understand why the school is doing it. >> i say -- the cheerleaders

wear pants, who cares? >> i never made the cheering squad. i couldn't do it that. not that the boys would care if i wear at uniform. i was in by popular demand. are we being too and reasonable? we always had cheer leaders in school in their uniforms. make some wear pants. >> that put on a pair of sweat. >> they can't wear leggingss now. >> where their outfits, the jeans and jerseys but if guys are walking around in skintight bicycle shorts. i think we would be distracted. >> we are wearing -- make the little longer. >> it is not a big deal. come on. >> cheerleaders at pet rallies wearing their uniforms to school. >> the same problem with the federal government getting involved.

some couples make big deal of it, making their relationship facebook official but if you want your love to ask you better listen up. you may want to and friend your significant other, maybe even though the facebook altogether. we will explain. please stay right here. diabetes, steady is exciting.

only glucerna has carbsteady, clinically proven to help minimize blood sugar spikes. so you stay steady ahead.

>> one of our friends is celebrating a birthday. how are you doing? speaking of friends are you friends with your partner on facebook? one relationship experts suggest you might think about unfriending then if you what you love to last. experts say those couple more likely to stay together because it brings a bit of mystery to the relationship forcing couples to be more physical time together. >> goes with the last segment. >> mystery or jealousy? >> what happens? who are they talking to on their case but page? >> you are -- mystery is good. mystery is good. jealousy is not good. mystery is good. >> all little jealousy is okay, worried about your partner.

a little instinct. >> a few -- we do like -- has great pictures, took their pictures. >> i greet this has to do with jealousy. why did you like so and so's picture but not mine? why did you write someone back, who is that you like to that person's page? >> it is good to be on top of your partner. not on facebook. >> figuratively. >> is almost an epidemic, facebook divorces, there are judges and divorce lawyers who say i had so many cases, so many clients who have broken up. >> get in touch with next -- >> i know a girl didn't feel secure in her relationship and started seeing her partner, and she fought now telling the world he is taken and she likes that.

>> your password your partner? >> my husband can get on my e-mail -- >> is there too much? should you have something to hide? >> i have been in relationships where you couldn't trust the person and that is the worst fielding. once you lose stressed -- >> i've been married 26 years, we like a little mystery. >> i don't -- >> joel little mystery. >> whether it is romantic, any kind of relationship leads to a lot of misunderstanding and jealousy, why are you hanging out with this person? why did you write this? what did you mean? was that directed at me? it might be of that idea to visit their page if you want to see. >> i am the only one with a face book, my daughter does too but that is about it. >> the check page? >> my daughter's?

we do. i do occasionally now. >> you need to check our page out at www. fox.com. we will see you back on tv tomorrow for another edition of "outnumbered" but for now "happening now". is taking center stage in washington. >> it is part of a massive rally. and the republicans pull a 180 in their efforts to stop the deal. we are covering all of the news now. >> there was a boom and it shook the plane. >> a flyer's nightmare as scrambling. >> they are escaping the burning jum bo jet. >> bullets hit as many as nine vehicles. >> we don't know if the shootings are random or