Skip to main content

tv   Justice With Judge Jeanine  FOX News  October 10, 2015 9:00pm-10:01pm PDT

9:00 pm
for the whole weekend. zzzquil. the non-habit forming sleep aid that helps you sleep easily, and wake refreshed. because sleep is a beautiful thing. i'm john stossel. thanks for watching. right now on "justice" -- >> i'm not going anywhere. i'm leading in every single poll. >> he's still on top. in moments, donald trump joins me live. we'll talk about the race, the issues, and this man. the u.s. army recommends no jail time for bowe bergdahl. so what happens next for the alleged military deserter? tonight, the donald on bergdahl, the race for president, and the secrets to his success. >> honestly? it's my looks. hello and welcome to
9:01 pm
"justice." i'm judge jeanine pirro. thanks for being with us. donald trump is going to join us in moments but first my open. i'm not surprised anymore when president barack obama does things that are un-american, unconstitutional, or just plain divisive and dangerous, like releasing five of the worst taliban in exchange for bowe bergdahl. but i am furious when members of the united states military, the ones who swear allegiance to god and country, the ones who swear to protect all of us bow to the political pressures of the white house and kiss the ring of a treasonous, worthless deserter. look, we already know where barack obama stands on this. you remember the fanfare and the hastily arranged press conference when he repeatedly hugged bergdahl's mother in the rose garden and grinned ear to
9:02 pm
ear while bergdahl's father, an american, thanked allah and spoke in the language of the taliban. an army officer who presided over the article 32 hearing recommends no jail time or any punitive discharge for bergdahl on charges of desertion and misbehavior before the enemy. a few facts. bergdahl tells platoon mates he wants to join the taliban and voluntarily leaves his unit during combat. he folds his clothes, takes water, protein bars, and his cell phone and a knife, leaves his weapons, and walks off. several of his platoon mates agree he is a deserter. afghanis tell reporters that bergdahl came through their villages, looking for the taliban. bergdahl actually calls his
9:03 pm
youunit and says he's not coming back. how do we know this? we intercepted his phone calls. a platoon member of his said he heard it firsthand. fact, the search for bergdahl needlessly puts soldier's lives at risk, and there are reports that several died looking for him in that area of afghanistan. but at the military hearing, the ent intercepts of the phone calls of bergdahl speaking with the taliban are not introduced into evidence. the general signed to investigate bergdahl actually testifies in his defense. and even bergdahl does not testify in his own defense. and now it is recommended by the military that he walk. folks, the fix is in. bowe bergdahl is a deserter, who left his unit during a time of war to join the enemy in itself
9:04 pm
a death penalty crime. other soldiers risked their lives and reports are that some lost their lives looking for him. there was one person who gets the final say here. this matter will be reviewed and ultimately decided by general robert abrams, commander of the u.s. army forces command, and hopefully he will make the right decision and recognize that this precedent is dangerous for our soldiers and our country. so you ask yourself, why would this happen? why? i'll tell you why, because the president of the united states can no be seen as knowingly trading a deserter, who could and should have faced death for five of the worst taliban in gitmo, two of whom have since tried to rejoin the taliban. and if any of these officers,
9:05 pm
lieutenant colonel mark fiskerr or general robert abrams gets promoted in the next 14 months before obama leaves, then there is proof that the fix is in. and that's my open. tell me what you think on my facebook page or twitter. and joining me now with reaction to this is fox's military analyst, major general bob scales. good evening, general. >> hi, judge. good to see you. >> so what do you think of this decision? >> first of all, let's be very clear. i haven't seen the article 32 investigation. as you said in your opening, an article 32 differs from a grand jury indictment in that it's just a recommendation. the colonel's recommendation goes to what's called a general court-martial convening authority. general abrams can agree with the article 32 or elevate it to
9:06 pm
a general court-martial. understand that recommending a special court-martial with no impressonment. a special court-martial is what you in the civilian arena would call a misdemeanor court. in other words, this offense is somewhat similar in my experience say with being convicted of shoplifting as an example. i've been a general court-martial convening authority and i understand the relative minor nature of a special versus a general court-martial. >> so the hearing officer in that article 32, which is kind of like a preliminary hearing or a grand jury, says i recommend a misdemeanor, don't worry about any felonies here. the truth is in 99% of the cases, as i understand it, the general who makes that ultimate decision follows the recommendation of that hearing judge in the article 32. is that not the case? >> no, not necessarily.
9:07 pm
i've been involved in several of these, where the gcm has turned around the recommendation, in both directions, judge. it's all because we're an organization that's under the chain of command. ultimately it's the commander that decides. but to your point, what disturbs those of us who served and all the veterans watching this on television, is not so much the legal niceties of it all. it's the optics. you know, the thing that defines a soldier's service is his willingness to lay down his life for his buddies. we call this the band of brothers effect. there's so much about the optics of this that violates this fundamental principle, not of law so much as the ethos of the soldier. that's why this case is so important, judge, for the ethics and values of my beloved army. >> general, listen to me, you can call it optics.
9:08 pm
you can call it visual. you can call it whatever you want. but when guy walks off his base in the middle of a war and looks for the enemy, that is desertion. >> well, it's not only desertion, but the other charge is misbehavior before the enemy, which actually is a more serious charge. in world war ii, you would have been executed for this. today, it's a misdemeanor. i'm not sure where this is all going, judge. >> major general bob scales, so good to see you. >> thank you, judge. joining me now by phone, republican front-runner presidential candidate donald trump. good evening, donald. >> hello, jeanine. >> all right, just this week you said bergdahl should be executed. now you hear about this. what do you think? >> well, i think it's a disgrace. he was a deserter 100%. i know you agree with this. he was a deserter 100%. it's not like the old days. in the old days, you deserted, you were in big trouble. today they want to find all
9:09 pm
sorts of excuses. it's crazy, just crazy. what's going on with our country is absolutely insane. five good, great soldiers, wonderful young people, and probably six, were killed looking for him. and now what do we get? we get him, which you can have him, and they get five of the great killers that they wanted for ten years, they wanted these people back. this is a difficult trade with obama. we get bergdahl and they get five killers. no good. >> and reports are that these five were killed looking for him, but i want to talk about you now. you are hands down still the front-runner, 32% of republicans support you. yet you get "the new york times" suggesting that you're looking for an exit strategy. what do you say to them? >> well, i think it's . i read that story. i'm leading every poll, every
9:10 pm
state, a poll just came out in new hampshire where i have like an 18-point lead and if you read the story, they ask what would it do to get you out? i said hey, look, if the world was coming down, the polls were terrible, everything was terrible, but right now i'm in first place. so they do a story that maybe, maybe he would consider. it's frankly a disgrace they're allowed to report it. it's disgraceful. i spoke to them. i told them i'm not leaving. certainly whoever heard you leading in the polls by a lot and they do a story -- i wonder if some day if trump may leave. the answer is, i'm not going anywhere. we're going to make this country great again, jeanine. >> you know what, donald? you said in reaction to what's going on in the republican party in congress right now that you would be okay with paul ryan as
9:11 pm
speaker but you need someone smart and tough and someone like you. who are the other people that you think can straighten things out and why are they in such a mess? >> i like paul. i said he would be somebody that a lot of people think is a compromise candidate. i would like to see somebody very tough, very smart. >> like whom? >> well, i don't want to mention names, because i spoke to one person that would think about doing it. i don't think he had a chance of getting in, but he's very tough. i think he could unify. you have to get somebody else that can unify a little bit. that is like a den of lions this there. they have to focus on the democrats, not themselves. but i would like to see somebody very tough and very, very smart. >> let's talk about ben carson. he's been saying some controversial things this week, donald. and he's getting a lot of attention. he's polling second. are you worried about anymore
9:12 pm
>> no, i'm not. i think he's a really nice guy, but i'm leading by a lot. frankly, ben has been very nice. he said one bad thing and took it back. i was all set to go, jeanine. everyone i've gone after is either gone or they're down to nothing. but he did the right thing and he took it back. honestly, he's been very nice to me and i've been very nice to him. >> let's talk about the dnc debate on tuesday. what should hillary be asked at this debate? >> well, i have a feeling she's not going to be asked a lot of the things she should be. i know your stance on the e-mails and you know what's going on there. it looks to me like she's protected by the democrats. she's protected by the fact that all of these people that are looking at her are democrats and they don't want to do anything. petraeus' life was destroyed, other people's lives were destroyed for doing 5% of what she did with the servers and
9:13 pm
everything else that's going on in her life. i just don't understand how this continues to go. in the meantime, i've been saying they'll probably leave her awe lone, because it's a disgrace to the country, but it's politics. unfortunately that's the way it works. i think he will probably make it, only for that reason, jeanine. only for that reason. >> what about bernie sanders? donald, you are the ultimate capitalist. bernie sanders is the ultimate socialist. what do you think of him? >> he is getting the second largest crowds after mine. i just got back from atlanta today. we were in the state of georgia, which is incredible. >> with 10,000 people. >> we had 10,000 people at 12:00 in the afternoon. we filled up a convention center. it was unbelievable. i will tell you, the crowds, and he's getting good crowds also, yet he's a socialist. you could even go a step further of being a socialist. there are those that would say
9:14 pm
he's beyond socialist. >> what do you call him, donald? beyond socialist? >> if i run against him, i will be calling him things people won't believe. but it's inconceivable he will make it. but if he does, i would love to run against him. but i would love to run against hillary also. look, it's all about making our country strong and rich and great again. we have to. and the word rich, somebody said that sounds a little crass. the truth is, if we don't take back our jobs and stop all the things going wrong with trade and with our military, we don't have any victories anymore. so we have to make our country rich and great again. >> just two more questions, donald. on a personal level, "people" magazine did a full spread on you. one of the things that was so touching here is they have a picture of you with the -- your
9:15 pm
kids and then five of your kids together. you have an incredible relationship with all of your kids, and your kits, five of them, have an incredible relationship with each other. the oldest is 37, and the youngest is 9. so what do you attribute this incredible connection that you have with all five of your kids and they have with each other? >> well, they do -- you know my family and my family has great admiration and respect for you. you were the d.a. when we watch t how you did things. bergdahl and all these other things wouldn't be happening if you were judge. i can tell your listeners that right now. but i have wonderful children, and they've been taken really good care by their parents, by myself and their mothers and really we're very proud of them. they're hardworking, the three elder ones are hardworking and
9:16 pm
doing a really good job and they're creating a lot of jobs. >> you know what's amazing, donald? you they have give yourself a lot of credit for the success of your family. i've seen you work with them. i've seen them as they've grown up with you. but one more personal question. your sister, marianne trump barry, is on the circuit court of appeals. if you become the president, are you going to make her a supreme? >> she would probably say no. she's considered one of the really brilliant people, as you know, in the federal court. he's a big federal judge and considered brilliant by everybody. she was always a great student and she's a tremendous person, and she's got great love for you, jeanine. >> are you going to appoint her to the supremes? >> she would say no way. she's very happy where he is. >> donald trump, thanks for being with us.
9:17 pm
>> thank you very much, jeanine. and now she's sinking fast in the polls. so why is hillary clinton even still in the race? a good question from one of her biggest supporters, right? i'm going to ask him that, next. plus, two dunkin donuts in hot water for discriminating against police. sheriff david clark is here next. and vote in tonight's insta poll. what questions should hillary clinton be asked at the democratic debate. facebook or tweet me. do you know the secret to a happy home in these modern times?
9:18 pm
it's a housewife who's in control of the finances. actually, any wife, husband, or human person can use progressive's name your price tool to take control of their budget. and while the men do the hard work of making money, she can get all the car insurance options her little heart desires. or the women might do the hard work of making money. [ chuckling ] women don't have jobs. is this guy for real? modernizing car insurance with -- that's enough out of you! the name your price tool, only from progressive. where is your husband? the name your price tool, reporter: uh, is that likeonize. car cars.com?nd repair. they actually have a feature called service & repair. no, because with ours you'll know the cost of labor and parts in your area, anyone else? reporter: like, like cars.com? so you'll never pay more than you should. reporter: like, cars.com? excuse me one second. she's totally right. i messed up, i'm sorry. cancel the ipo. research, price, find. get the right service, without all the drama.
9:19 pm
cars.com all drive. no drama.
9:20 pm
9:21 pm
another day, another hillary clinton scandal. this while a new poll shows clinton with a double digit drop in support, just days before the first democratic debate. and with me now is my friend, democratic strategist and adviser to hillary clinton's 2008 campaign, richard goodstein. how are you, richard? >> i'm doing well. you know, that credit card is still burning a hole in my pocket from that lunch i owe you. >> i think you're going to owe me dinner by the time this is dinner. hillary clinton's latest bait and switch is the transpacific trade deal. first she was for it, now she's
9:22 pm
against it. >> first of all, she was for it as the gold standard three years ago. since then, there have been all these negotiations that have taken place. now in atlanta they just wrapped up. the agreement has changed quite a bit since she was secretary of state and was speaking out about it. what she said now is, it doesn't meet her standard about what would be good for protecting american jobs and american wages. >> come on, richard. you're talking to me. i mean, you're talking about fine print that we don't even know is the reason. doesn't she put her finger up to the political winds and say, look, i'm having trouble with the unions. i have the american federation of manufactures and the afl-cio and the teamsters and i'm losing support. let me go for jobs. >> i don't hear you asking donald trump the same question when he expresses the same objections that hillary does about currency manipulation. >> here's the thing about donald with the unions. they want to support donald
9:23 pm
because he gives them jobs and he understands the economy and he's in the real world. don't get me started on donald, richard. let's move on. ms. transparency, she takes six months to hand over her server and she pretty much lied about everything. now we find out there's a second company that's backed up this server, and an employee of the first company says there's some shady stuff going on and he's worried about it, and her i.t. person is pleading the fifth. this is dangerous territory, is it not? >> hillary clinton, jeanine, is out there talking about ways to control costs for health care, for education, for child care. she's talking about voters' rights and clean energy. what her political opponents are talking about is benghazi and
9:24 pm
e-mails. i bet you a year from now, her opponent and the republican party will be saying, what were we thinking, having all this focus on something that doesn't affect real people's lives. this e-mail stuff is the biggest red hearing -- >> real people's lives? how about the families of those that died in benghazi? don't think it's not real stuff. you know what? the fbi are hot on the trail and they wouldn't be taking the fifth if they weren't worried about something. and a year from now, if they're not talking about this e-mail server or she isn't indicted, i'm taking you to dinner. first democratic debate coming up. how is she going to come off? she's a happy human being as opposed to the robot. who is hillary clinton going to be on tuesday night? >> so she's going into this debate, not with standing with
9:25 pm
what you said, with the wind in her pack. >> she just lost ten points. how can she have the wind in her back? >> look at the gallup poll. just last week, she's had a fantastic rebound in september. every single poll, she's good in iowa, not great in new hampshire. and i think this is her strong suit. the reason that she has rebounded is she started doing more tv appearances. and the public is seeing her and going, oh, that's right, that's why we like her. people talk about this whole trustworthiness issue. people trust her to stand up for the middle class. >> 58% of the american public doesn't trust her, richard. we'll keep going. >> bill clinton got re-elected
9:26 pm
in '96 with the same deficit. >> richard, thanks for being with us tonight. all right. and the race for the speakership continues as republicans scramble for a new house leader. this while congressman kevin mccarthy drops out of the running. joining me now is gop strategist david bela. good evening, david. >> good to be here. >> look, is the republican party in the midst of an identity crisis in you have the tea party. you have the freedom caucus. you have the establishment candidates. and now it's almost like it's being focused on this speaker issue in the house. who is the republican party? >> a year ago we were talking about the resurgence of the develop and how strong we are. we're going to be okay, jeanine. that said, republicans must unite behind one candidate. >> who should that candidate be? >> we have to figure that out. let me just say this. today we have college football,
9:27 pm
tomorrow we have the nfl. we've had a lot of republicans in the house who are the second team who think they ought to be starters. one of them ought to step up if they think they can lead the house and try to be a starter. >> i love jason chaffetz. >> we have 15 wibills that the house and senate could pass tomorrow, whether that's keystone pipeline, the defense spending bill. let's send them to the president and make him veto. >> why aren't they doing it? and by the way, who is daniel webster? >> former congressman from florida, former speaker of the house who the freedom caucus has endorsed, at least for now. until they see what other candidates -- >> i mean, let's get somebody that people know. outsiders seem to be winning, david. that's what is happening in the presidential contest. will it happen in the speaker's
9:28 pm
race? and by the way, you don't have to be in congress to be elected speaker. >> maybe you can be the speaker. >> no, thanks. >> look, tough job. >> why? >> you have a very diverse caucus, and everybody has different ideas how to go. look, here is what the next republican speaker will be successful when they can ignite the caucus and get everyone behind it. the way we will be successful is by a caucus that is united. otherwise, we turn -- people are talking about it. but let me just say this. if we don't unite behind one republican, if we go into a floor fight for speaker, we turn the agenda over to the president for the next two years. >> you better talk to the guys in the house about that. campaign 2016, ben carson stirring it up. traditionally, he makes controversial statements. now it's almost as though it's
9:29 pm
the rule of engagement. >> outsider candidates are not new. but not since 1940 has one been able to sustain and become the nominee. and republicans are more conservative than just an ideology. republican primary voters, since 1940, have voted for the individual who has been loyal to the party, who has shown a track record of success. that's how we differentiate between rhetoric and actually getting results. and that's going to be the key for whether it's donald trump, whether that's ben carson or carly fiorina. how do they show actual results for the ideas that they're promoting? >> all right. david, thanks for being with us tonight. >> thank you, judge. next, the war on police officers. i'll talk about it with this man, sheriff david clark. plus, is hillary clinton that unlikable?
9:30 pm
. in the nation, we know how it feels when you aren't treated like a priority. we do things differently. we'll take care of it. we put members first. join the nation. thank you.
9:31 pm
9:32 pm
9:33 pm
choose, choose, choose. but at bedtime? ...why settle for this? enter sleep number. don't miss the columbus day sale. sleepiq technology tells you how well you slept and what adjustments you can make. you like the bed soft. he's more hardcore. so your sleep goes from good to great to wow! only at a sleep number store. right now save $600 on the #1 rated bed, plus 24-month financing. hurry, ends tuesday! know better sleep with sleep number. trust number one doctor recommended dulcolax constipated? use dulcolax tablets for gentle overnight relief suppositories for relief in minutes and stool softeners for comfortable relief
9:34 pm
of hard stools. dulcolax, designed for dependable relief . live from america's news headquarters i'm robert gray. at least 95 people were killed by two bombs in turkey saturday. another 245 were injured. turkish authorities say the bombs exploded about 50 yards apart from each other, almost simultaneously. the explosions during a peace rally. no one has claimed responsibility but turkish prime minister suggests either kurdish rebels or isis militants could be to blame. bill cosby appears for a deposition in boston that lasted seven hours. the woman claims cosby sexual
9:35 pm
assaulted her in the play boy mansion. i'm robert gray, now back to justice with judge jeanine. i'm robert gray. now back to "justice with judge jeanine." welcome back to "justice." the war on police continues. just this past week, a duncan donuts employee in connecticut said "we don't serve cops here." while a dunkin doughnuts in rhode island is apologizing after an employee wrote "black lives matter" on a police officer's coffee cop. that's just the latest in a string of attacks across the u.s. with my sheriff david clark. should these duncan donuts'
9:36 pm
employees be fired? >> without a doubt. this is symbolic of the lack of respect for authority going on. i'm tired of these companies thinking a simple apology will do. apologies are for funerals, not for business. they have a brand to protect. if they want to send a message about how important it is to treat people with respect, they ought to fire them. >> if they said, we don't serve muslims here, they not only would fire the guy, they would shut the place down. when you think about it, it is financially a benefit to them to make shower that they are friendly with comes. just think about it. but it's almost as though you guys don't have the lobby that you need, because there are some organizations that have a lobby, you say this much and you're gone. >> right. it happened to the pizza maker in indiana and the bakery in oregon, i think it was, where it destroyed their business. and they didn't do nearly what -- anything close to what's happening here. so yeah, there seems to be a
9:37 pm
different standard. but i think the police are fighting back. we can get coffee anywhere. most businesses welcome a uniformed officer coming in, because it's a deterrent to hold-up men. hold-up men case a business, and if they see an officer stopping periodically, they go somewhere else. it also prevents unruly customers. so fortunately, the businesses are on our side. this is a black eye for dunkin donuts. i think krispy kreme makes better donuts any way. >> were you surprised at the backlash against president obama when he admitted that he wanted to politicize the shootings in roseberg, oregon? what do you think of the families and the people, you know, who were protesting saying we don't want you hear? >> yeah, i thought it was great.
9:38 pm
you know, he never misses an opportunity to politicize something. any time there's a tragedy that happens in the united states, he goes into his political bag of tricks to see what he can accomplish on his agenda and it's sad that he exploits these people and i'm glad they saw through it. when he takes advantage and uses them to achieve a political agenda, i'm glad to see that they slapped back. this is a do as i say, not as i do president. and he speaks as he is surrounded by this protective bubble, which he should have. if he wants to disarm people, he should start with his security staff. >> the president said he wants to expand background checks of gun purchasers, and he would use an executive order to do it. we both know it's about the mental health of the shooter. that's the kind of information we can't get. so what kind of a background
9:39 pm
check is he going to do if not all agencies provide wrap sheets to the federal agencies. >> look how the fbi missed the charleston church shooter. they potentially, at least that day, could have stopped that sale of that firearm. nothing is absolute in the world, and it's not a perfect world. so i'm not going to come down too hard on the fbi. but getting back to the president, this isn't about tightening up who can and can't get a gun for the president of the united states, barack obama. this is about gun confiscation. it's not about gun control, it's about gun confiscation. for the president, it's about breaking the back of the strong gun lobby in the united states, the national rifle association, the gun owners of america who protect that second amendment 24-.
9:40 pm
they know they have to weaken them to put in tighter gun restrictions, which only hurt law-abiding team. what we need in this country right now, we need well-armed, well-intentioned law abiding theme. that will seven as a deterrent and quickly stop these situations when they begin. >> sheriff david clark, thank you for being with us. >> my pleasure. >> with me, robin thomas. good evening, robin. do you believe an executive order by president obama will take guns out of the wrong hands? >> thanks for having me on. and i do think that there is so many things we can do to improve upon our existing gun regulations in america. the president has some limited things that he can do through executive action, and he certainly can take marginal steps to make our system a little safer. but he can't do that much without cooperation from congress.
9:41 pm
>> i'm glad you agree with that. but he says he wants to have expanded background check. what does he want to know? >> the situation now is that background checks only take place when you buy a gun from a licensed firearms dealer. but if you buy a gun from a hobby seller, like a gun show, no background check is required under federal law. so he's said he wants to take a look at doing a better job identifying who should be defined as being in the business of selling firearms. if you're in the business, we should be doing background checks. right now, that's not the case. so he's just talking about using executive action to look better at that question and figure out if there's a way to fill in that gap where background checks are not happening. >> wouldn't you agree that the real issue is the mental health of the shooter? i mean, we've seen it with holmes, and with lanza. they're all nutjobs. no background check is going to
9:42 pm
tell you who is someone that's got a mental illness, who has been in a mental health facility. that's all protected by hippa. if the president were serious, wouldn't he want to loosen up some of those rules to find out who the nutjobs are who are on psychotropic drugs? >> the way it works is we have limited categories of people with dangerousmental illness that are prohibited from buying guns already. >> we don't know who they are. robin, i don't mean to interrupt you, but we don't know who they are. because we can't get their regards. >> if the states put those records into the system, the information is still protected by hipa, but the system can flag those people without invading privacy laws. so there is a way to do this.
9:43 pm
we can do a better job with it. i think it could be a stronger system, but there isn't any privacy protection that inhibits us from creating a better system. >> robin, are you saying that if someone is in a mental health institution and gets released, that is information that the local police department can get when they do a background check? no! >> correct. if you're involuntarily committed into a mental institution, that record should be going into the background check system. and when a firearms dealer runs a background check on you, that should flag you as being denied. the dealer won't know what the reason is, but you will be flagged. >> we'll have you back, robin. thanks for being with us tonight. and next, i measure hillary's likability rating with her wanna be constituents. see what i found.
9:44 pm
esurwhich means fewer costs, which saves money. their customer experience is virtually paperless, which saves paper, which saves money. they have smart online tools, so you only pay for what's right for you, which saves money. they settle claims quickly, which saves time, which saves money. they drive an all-hybrid claims fleet, which saves gas, which saves money. they were born online, and built to save money, which means when they save, you save. because that's how it should work in the modern world. esurance. backed by allstate. click or call. test.
9:45 pm
glad i could help you plan for your retirement.
9:46 pm
alright, kelly
9:47 pm
and promise me that you'll try that taco place on south street. and we have portfolio planning tools to help you manage your ira. yeah, you're old 401k give me your phone. the rollover consultants give you step-by-step help. no set-up fees. use your potion. sorry, not you. my pleasure. goodnight, tim. for all the confidence you need. who's tim? td ameritrade. you got this.
9:48 pm
author ed klein is out with a book about hillary clinton called "unlikable." so is she unlikable? i took to the streets to put that theory to the test. take a look. do you know this sfwhom >> looks like hillary clinton. >> who is that? >> i recognize the lady, yes. >> do you recognize her? >> no, i don't. >> hey, ladies, do you know who this person is? >> yes, hillary. >> do you know this woman? >> no. >> yes, you do. >> all right, all right, yeah. >> do you know who that person is? >> that's what is her name. >> who is it? >> hillary -- >> clinton. >> very good. do you think that she's likable or unlikablunlikable? >> i feel unlikable. >> i like her. >> is she likable or not?
9:49 pm
>> likable. >> i can understand why some people think that way, and i can understand why people feel the other way. >> okay. you're down the middle. why is she cool, dude? >> she is one of the first females to run for president. >> what is likeable about her? >> you're going to run this on air, i presume? i'll pass. >> that means you don't know anything that's likable. do you think she should be president? >> personal opinion? i'm not keen on a female being president at all any ways. >> whoa! do you want her to be president this >> i'll a heart attack. >> do you want her to be president this >> why not, i'm sure? i'm not a cameraman. >> do you have a warrant outstanding somewhere? >> what do you like about hillary? >> i like the idea of a woman being president.
9:50 pm
>> what has she done that's benefited you? >> nothing. >> she was a good senator. >> what did she do? >> there were a number of bills that i don't remember. >> can you name an accomplishment she's done as senate for new york? >> no. >> how about secretary of state? >> no. but i know about benghazi. >> you would be comfortable with her? >> definitely. >> if you were on a roof top in benghazi, would you be comfortable with her? >> maybe with some marines. i don't know about with her. >> she shouldn't let them have the marines. you don't think a woman could run the country? >> no, not right now. >> do you think we're in a good place now? >> no. >> we've got a guy running it. you love obama. he can't run again. >> he can't? >> she's likable. >> what has she done for you? >> nothing. >> thank you. >> we'll be right back with our insta poll results. stay with us. take a look at these bbq trophies: best cracked pepper sauce...
9:51 pm
most ribs eaten while calf roping... yep, greatness deserves recognition. you got any trophies, cowboy? ♪ whoomp there it is uh, yeah... well, uh, well there's this one. best insurance mobile app? yeah, two years in a row. well i'll be... does that thing just follow you around? like a little puppy! the award-winning geico app. download it today.
9:52 pm
9:53 pm
9:54 pm
from and the people whought you underwhelbrought youet speeds. temperamental satellite television. introducing... underwhelming internet speeds and temperamental television... in one. welcome to the moment no one's been waiting for. the fastest internet and the best tv experience is already here with x1. only from xfinity. now for the results of tonight's instapoll. what question should hillary clinton be asked at the democratic debate? jim says, of all the lies you've told over the years, which one
9:55 pm
is your favorite and why? shailene says "my question is, who's going to be on your prison visitors' list?" and tony asked, what difference does it make? greg asks, where did you hide those e-mails? sarah asks, "what makes you think you can be the next commander in chief when you can't even keep track of your e-mails, your ambassadors or your husband?" oh, that stung. jena asked "why did she refuse to declare boko haram a terrorist group if she advocates for women?" al has one question, "when was the last time you told the truth?" steven asks, "would you like a 4 x 8 or 5 x 6 cell? lisa, if you can't be careful enough to use a secure server, then why should people think you're wise, smart, strong and savvy enough to be our president? carolyn asked, why did you
9:56 pm
completely ignore ambassador steven's pleas for more security for our people in benghazi? why should we trust you with the security of our nation? wow. thanks for the great responses. i always love reading what you guys think. make sure you log on and send me your thoughts on tonight's show. and check out my thoughts on all the news throughout the week. plus great behind the scenes photos. that's it for us tonight. and remember, you don't ever have to miss justice. just set your dvr and tell your friends to do the same. thanks for joining us. remember, friend me on facebook, remember, friend me on facebook, follow me on twitter next. ♪ expected wait time: 55 minutes. your call is important to us. thank you for your patience. waiter!
9:57 pm
in the nation, we know how it feels when you aren't treated like a priority. we do things differently. we'll take care of it. we put members first... join the nation. thank you.
9:58 pm
9:59 pm
sure! i offer multi-car, safe driver, and so many other discounts that people think i'm a big deal. and boy, are they right. ladies, i can share hundreds in savings with all of you! just visit progressive.com today.
10:00 pm
but right now, it's choosing time. ooh! we have a winner. all: what? [chuckles] he's supposed to pick one of us. this is a joke, right? that was the whole point of us being here. >> what does it look like when you become the most powerful leader of the world? what is more classified hillary clinton's e-mails some call it yelp for people i call it the worst idea for children. >> evil, dumb or stupid. pick one of those. >> feels

82 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on