what do you thing? do you think the driver who hit the guy on the motorcycle did it intentionally? let me know what think. thanks for watching. i'm megyn kelly. >> welcome to "hannity." the feud between front-runner donald trump and his gop rival jeb bush is now reaching a boiling point. the two candidates are going at each other over the 9/11 terrorist attacks. been saying about donald trump in recent days. take a look. >> look, my brother responded to a crisis, and he did it as you would hope a president would do. he united the country. he organized our country and kept us safe. and there's no denying that. the great majority of americans believe that. i don't know why he keeps bringing this up. his view of history is just wrong. the simple fact is that, when we were attacked, my brother created an environment where, for 2,600 days, we were safe.

>> here to respond donald trump. mr. trump, welcome back, sir. how are you? >> i'm very good, thank you, sean. >> what is your reaction to the ongoing feud? >> number one, i really respect the fact that jeb is sticking up for his brother. i would stick up for my brothers also. he's sticking up for his brother, and i understand that. but this all started when he said that we're safe, you know, the country was safe. the world trade center was just attacked, it fell down. 3,000 people were killed. thousands and thousands of people were injured and to this day are injured. and it was the worst attack in history. you can't say he kept our country safe because he was president. as truman said, the buck stops here. so he was president. and if you look at my book, which was written a couple of years prior to the attack, i actually mentioned the name of usama bin laden, that he's a bad terrorist and we have to do something about it. and when one of your competitors heard about it today, they said,

whoa, whoa, this is amazing. trump actually predicted it. because i actually said in the book that something would happen. nobody talks about it. but i talk talk about the name usama bin laden. >> i have the quote. this is exactly what you wrote. this was in a book you published in 2000, "the america we deserve." you said i'm really convinced that we're in danger of the sort of twist attacks that will make the bombing of the trade center look like kid's play with firecrackers. no sensible analyst rejects this possibility and plenty of them, like me, are not wondering if but when it will happen. in the book you also wrote, quote, one day we're told that a shadowy figure with no fixed address named usama bin laden is public enemy number one, and u.s. jetfighters lay waste to his camp in afghanistan. he escapes back under some rocks and a few news cycles later it's on to a new enemy, a new crisis. how could you have stopped it? >> i mean, i know what's happening, sean. i know what's going on. i think i could have stopped it

because i have very tough illegal immigration policies. people aren't coming into this country unless they're vetted and vetted properly. if you look at what happened, george tenet, who was the head of the cia. first of all, the cia and the fbi and everybody else, they weren't talking with each other because they weren't getting along. that's leadership. you have to get everybody to get along. second of all, george tenet predicted an attack. george tenet said there's going to be an attack. they should have done something about it. so i'm not blaming anybody, and this started very innocently when i said, you know, to somebody frankly that didn't really matter, i said, listen, the world trade center came down during -- you know, there's nothing safe when the world trade center was attacked and came down during his reign. that's not safe because jeb said our country was safe. well, that's not the case. and then if you want to go a little further, he then attacked iraq, which turned out not to be the right country because they didn't have weapons of mass

destruction and, by the way, the terrorists sent their families home to saudi arabia. they didn't send them home to iraq, they sent them home to saudi arabia, which is another thing for people to think about. >> mr. trump, the only disagreement we have is that we knew saddam had weapons of mass destruction because we have the images of the kurds that were slaughtered and little children and women in the street. we knew there was a chemical attack. and the world's intelligence in fairness also thought that. i want to add another element to this. >> you know, by the way, but they never found them. >> i think they went to syria, myself. >> i don't know. they never found them. frankly, they probably used them against iran. which was really beautiful -- not that they used the weapons, but the beauty of it was that you had two countries that were equal in strength and we decapitated one and now iran is taking over iraq and isis is taking oil and iran is taking oil and they're taking over the whole country. it's turned out to be really bad. with that being said, i respect

the fact that jeb is defending his brother. i think that's good. i would do the same thing. >> at one point i've always agreed with you on, about we liberate kuwait and iraq, they have to pay us for the liberation. we need to give money to the families that lost brave american soldiers who are injured for the rest of their lives. we don't do thatp about. >> and by the way, sean -- >> if you would have held the ground, isis would have never emerged. he want to pull out for political reasons. >> i love that you bring up kuwait. kuwait had nothing but money. they get attacked by iraq. they take over kuwait. the rich arabs go and they move into london, as you know, the kuwaitis, they moved into london. they didn't take a room like you would or maybe even i would. they took the entire hotel. and they lived like kings. and then we attacked. we lose lives, we spent billions of dollars and we give them back the country for nothing. >> nothing, nothing. >> and they don't even want to invest in -- then i told them. i had them in my office a few months after that.

they don't like investing in the united states. we gave them the country back for nothing. we should have said we want 50% of everything you make for the next 50 years or permanently and you know what, they would have agreed to it. we gave it back for nothing. why did we do that? >> we're a stupid country. that's the answer. we negotiate bad deals. i agree with you. let me add another element to this whole how come america wasn't prepared for 9/11. in a little known speech on long island that bill clinton gave in february of 2002, the audio's a little sketchy, but i want you to pay close attention where he said, well, you know, we knew he wanted to commit crimes against america, but i had no legal basis to take him. and i think he missed the opportunity. you had published two years earlier what a bad guy bin laden was. listen to clinton admit that he could have gotten him but he failed to take action.

so the key words are he committed no crimes against america, so i didn't bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him even though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against america. and here's the point. in 2000, you identified him as a citizen, a private citizen. and bill clinton knew he wanted to commit crimes against america, had the opportunity to get him, and didn't take him? doesn't he bear that responsibility? >> well, he made a mistake, but i will tell you that if i were there, i would have taken him out. i wrote about him in my book.

when i talk about the world trade center, that was the first attack which was, compared to what happened, ultimately relatively minor, but i talk about usama bin laden in my book and people can't believe it. they're just starting to read that book. that was the only political book i had ever done. they can't believe i mentioned the same usama bin laden. remember, he had to crawl under a rock, but we have to get him. and clinton made a mistake. and frankly, bush should have taken him out. somebody should have taken him out. i think my immigration policies would have gone a long way to helping this also, sean. >> the immigration policy -- we're now facing a crisis. you see what's happening in europe. there's a huge backlash because of syrian refugees and iraqi refugees and the cost. we're being told by our national intelligence director that isis and al qaeda -- not if, they will infiltrate the refugee community. this president has committed to nearly 250,000 coming to america. that tells me we have a

pre- 9/11 mind-set again. your thoughts? >> i was also a big fan of merkel from germany. i'm not a fan any more. what she's doing is insane. and we want to take in 200,000, and we don't know where they come from, they have no papers. all we know is they're young and they're strong and they're mostly men. and this could be the greatest trojan horse ever. this could be bigger than the original trojan horse. we shouldn't be taking anybody. we have enough problems. we have to rebuild our country, our infrastructure, we owe $19 trillion. and taking in 200,000 will cost us -- they just did a study, over a period of ten years will cost us billions of dollar. merkel made a tremendous mistake. they're going to end up having a revolution in germany. you see what's happening with the german people. >> 100%. >> from a humane standpoint, take a big chunk of syria and let's all put money into it if we have to because on a humane basis and build what's called a safe zone. let the people -- but to allow

them into germany and to allow them into these other countries where there's nothing but a horror show. you see what's happening. now we're going to take in 200,000 people? in this country? >> it's insane. >> we can't breathe. we don't know what we're doing. >> i suggested the same thing. make it a secure zone, offer humanitarian assistance, offer food, water, medicine and supplies. >> fine, fine. >> to close the circle on the feud with jeb, if jeb wins the many noenatio-- nomination, wou support him? >> absolutely yes. i would absolutely support him. he's a good person, he's a good man. i would support him. >> more with donald trump. the republican front-runner right after the break. we have a lot of polls to show you he's continuing his stronghold over his rivals, plus if he wins the nomination, who would donald trump like to face in a general election? hillary clinton, joe biden, bernie sanders? that's next. tonight during a recent fund-raiser for his brother,

president george w. bush reportedly did not hold back his true feelings you owned your car for four years. you named it brad. you loved brad. and then you totaled him. you two had been through everything together. two boyfriends. three jobs. you're like "nothing can replace brad!" then liberty mutual calls. and you break into your happy dance. if you sign up for better car replacement, we'll pay for a car that's a model year newer

with 15,000 fewer miles than your old one. see car insurance in a whole new light. liberty mutual insurance.

accustom ryan is considering running for speaker of the house giving until friday for them to accept his requirements. the major getting the endorsement of the caulks. >> we need to move from opposition to being a proposition party. because we think the nation is on the wrong pat we have a duty

to show the right one. we have to be a visionary right now. and saying he would no longer run for speaker and s saying ryan is the right person at the right time. let's get you back to hannity. welcome back to "hannity." donald trump continues to surge in three brand-new polls, in the nbc news/"wall street journal" poll donald trump is on top with 25%. that's the highest he's received since he entered the race. dr. ben carson is second with 22%, marco rubio with 13, ted cruz, jeb bush and carly fiorina all in single digits. we have a brand new cnn/roc poll also good news for donald trump. he's in first place with 27% of the vote. dr. carson in second with 22%. followed by jeb bush, marco rubio, mike huckabee and rand

paul also in single digits. trump has the lead in the new monmouth poll. he has 28% in that poll. and we have a new morning consult poll that had you at 51% if you look at those that look at you as their second choice and donald trump the 2016 front-runner, what do you make of these polls? i know you talk a lot about the polls, but they have been steady, they've been consistent. and now byron york has a piece out and there was another piece that week that says finally the establishment believes you can win and byron york outlines how the establishment plans to go after you as not being a conservative. are you ready to deal with that? and what will you do? >> i have meetings in new hampshire. we have thousands and thousands of people, 6,000, 8,000 people every time. i went to dallas and we have 20,000 in mark cuban's arena, alabama, 30,000, oklahoma

20,000. every place in iowa, thousands and thousands, overflow crowds. people are tired of being ripped off in our country. we're run by people that are incompetent. they don't know what they're doing. every nation is beating us. obamacare is a disaster. our iran deal was done by people that don't know what they're doing. they don't know what they're doing. and people see what's happening. and look, they know i do things properly. i do the right thing. and they just like what i'm saying. >> the establishment now thinks you can win. and what they're planning and what they're telegraphing they're planning is a barrage of ads in early states, huge buys, millions and millions of dollars trying to chip away at your conservative credentials with primary voters. what do you think is the best way to respond to that? >> but they're not buying -- the candidates aren't buying the ads. the people that are buying the ads are the special interests, the donors, the people that are

lobbyists. you have lobbyists. i know half the lobbyists. who knows a lobbyist better than me, i know the good once and the bad ones. when they come to me to say they want me to do something for these companies even though it's not in the interest of the united states, i'm not going to do it. when they say to do something that's adverse to the people of the united states, i won't do that. because i'm not taking their money. >> will you fight these ads with your own money? >> i always fight back. i have to fight back. i wouldn't be leading every poll. no, but i wouldn't be leading every poll. sean, you have to understand, these people have hundreds of millions of dollars that they've given to these politicians and the politicians are puppets for them. they're just puppets. with me, i'm going to do what's right for the country. we have $19 trillion in debt. we're going to get the debt -- we're going to do things right. we're not going to let china rip us off any more. it's enough already. you know last year we had an imbalance with china of $450

billion. who can stand that? you can't do that. and this has gone on for years and years and nobody does anything because they have lobbyists, they have special interests, and i'm going to represent the people. we're going to make this country so great and so strong. but with that, a lot of money's going to be spent. and i just hope when people are watching these phony ads that are going to be put out, that they're going to understand, it's not the candidate. it's all of these special interests, sean, that want to not have a guy like trump because they're going to be out of business. >> for them, this is the art of political war for them. and i think they're serious about it because they're talking about their power going away. of the three democrats, it looks like biden's getting in the race, so the three democrats, biden, hillary, bernie sanders, if you win the nomination, is there any one you prefer going up against? >> i don't think sanders is going to get there, frankly. and i don't mind going against hillary's record. i think i'd beat her.

you see the various polls. i just beat her in florida. a poll came out today that i'd beat her pretty easily in florida. i beat her nationwide. i don't mind going against hillary. biden right now he's got his little period of time where he's popular. as soon as he gets in, he'll get beaten up very badly. he's done this three or four times. he's lost every time. i don't mind going against him at all. i don't want to pick a favorite, to be honest. i think i might have a favorite. but if you go by hillary's record, she'd win very easily. >> do you have any thought three people you would consider to be your vice president? >> i've given thought, but i don't want to discuss it. that's too early. you have to get there, first. you have so many people they don't win, they don't know how to win. i don't want to talk about anything. i do know how to win, but that's so far down the road. i will say i do respect some of the people that i'm running against and i respect many of the people -- you have many good republicans out there that could really help and be terrific. and we're going to unify the

republican party. we're going to unify it and make it strong and we're going to win. we're not going to do what romney did last time. we're going to unify the republican party and we're going to win. >> i heard you were supposed to be on jimmy kimmel tonight, did something happen? >> no, i have a political event, but i'm going to do his show in two weeks. i have a big political event i can't skip. i have this event, i can't skip it. but i will be doing it in two weeks when i'm out in los angeles. >> there's an article that came out about hillary. she has big hearings coming up about benghazi. we know that ambassador stevens requested security before it was denied. we know that during the attack, that there was a stand-down order given because i interviewed people that were there, they told me personally. we know they made up this story about a youtube video and a spontaneous demonstration. what do you think about the hearings? and there was another article that came out in the washington free beacon, that she paid men

$15,000 a year more than women. what's your reaction of those two things with her? >> i have to tell you i was really looking forward to the hearings, then you had a congressman, republican go against trey gowdy and all of the people, as you know, then you had a whistleblower come out. so that hurt. that was not exactly positive. then yesterday i watched trey, who i do respect, i think he's a terrific guy, but he seemed to be doing a big pivot. this isn't about hillary clinton. i'm pretty good at figuring this stuff out. he seems to be doing, sean -- i'm sure you saw it. he seemed to be doing a big pivot away from hillary clinton. and i was trying to figure out what that was all about. so you may not be as happy as you think with these hearings. i just don't know. the hearings, i was looking forward to them. but with all that's happening. and i was surprised he pivoted away so much from hillary. these hearings are not about her. actually, we want to discuss other people much more so. and it sounded like he was sort of pulling away from going after her. so i'm going to have to see what the hearings are all about.

>> all right, mr. trump, thanks so much. we appreciate your time. >> thank you. >> coming up, george w. bush does not like texas senator ted cruz very much. according to politico, he said so during a fund-raiser for his brother. we'll check in with carl cameron. then later we're counting down the days until hillary testifies before the benghazi select committee. congressman jim jordan sits on that committee. he'll be here with a preview of what we can expect. and 2016 republican presidential candidate new jersey governor chris christie drops by to talk about the growing tension in the middle east and whether or not america should be taking in syrian and iraqi refugees straight ahead. think your heartburn pill works fast? take the zantac it challenge! zantac works in as little as 30 minutes. nexium can take 24 hours. when heartburn strikes, take zantac for faster relief than nexium or your money back. take the zantac it challenge.

i built my business with passion. but i keep it growing by making every dollar count. that's why i have the spark cash card from capital one. i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy for my studio. ♪ and that unlimited 2% cash back from spark means thousands of dollars each year going back into my business... that's huge for my bottom line. what's in your wallet? welcome back to "hannity." the battle for the 2016 gop nomination is getting contentious. and former president george w. bush is jumping into the fray after reportedly taking a shot at a conservative candidate. this shocked me a little bit,

carl. >> it's getting juicy, sean. i've spoken with some of the folks that heard from president george w. bush at a private fund raiser for his brother jeb sunday night. we're told he's very bullish saying that jeb would win the nomination and ultimately the presidency. he was talking about senator ted cruz that he just doesn't like the guy. cruz is gaining in the polls, has a real anti-insurgent type candidate and he's arguably been the toughest critic of all the leaders in the senate and really critical of chief justice roberts for upholding the constitutionality of obamacare twice. roberts was a george bush nominee. cruz issued a statement saying, quote, i have great respect for president bush and was proud to work on his campaign and in his administration. it's no surprise that president bush is supporting his brother and attacking the candidates he believes pose a threat to his campaign. i have no intention of

reciprocating. i met my wife working on his campaign. so i'll always be grateful to him. as for rubio, he's not sure being a first-term senator qualifies you to be president. but then hedged his bets. he said if rubio wins the nomination he'd be back next year saying that doesn't matter suggesting that maybe his brother night not. all in all, trump is a solid front-runner in all this. polls show the grassroots love him. carson has pulled into a virtual tie. the outsider front-runners have a lead on rubio and cruz who are battles for third place. that's telling. it shows their momentum and explains why the former president zinged both of them. jeb's in fourth place. the next debate is in eight days and the first caucuses in iowa are less than 15 weeks from now. and a lot in the bush camp are getting nervous. they're beginning to call out the calvary and his brother is

part of that. >> doug schoen and jedediah bila. they want to take him out and they want to spend millions to do it. will it work in your opinion? >> as of today, no, because no one on the stage is able to get anyone's attention away from trump. >> campaign ads in particular. you know what, though? that doesn't matter if you have candidates that get on a debate stage next to trump and get drowned out by him. someone like a marco rubio and someone like a ted cruz, they have a lot of potential, but as of today they're not able to grab that microphone away from donald trump. if they can't do it in the flesh, i don't think any campaign ad can do it. >> why george bush -- this is surprising to me. why would he be angry at ted cruz and not at donald trump who has been very harsh on jeb. >> the president has maintained his dignified silence for years and this is the moment and subject he speaks out about. it's curious except if you look at the polls.

the top ranked candidates are donald trump and ben carson. then the next two are rubio and cruz. it's interesting that president bush, who represents in many ways the powerful establishment, going after the two that are ranked just above his brother in the poll ratings. i think, you know, senator cruz gave a very classy statement there about president bush. but it shows desperation in the bush camp that despite all the money and the establishment backing that they can't gain any more traction. >> i don't think they understand how angry the base conservatives are. and i'm one of them. >> i think there's a very good chance for precisely the reasons you're suggest iing. the republican base is angry. looking at the polls is what monica says exactly right. you look at nevada, south carolina, new jersey, connecticut, florida, new hampshire. big, expanding trump leads. you look at the head-to-head

with hillary, dead heat in general elections. sean, the report of trump's demise are greatly exaggerated. >> can trump put, if he were the candidate, a state like new york in play or new jersey or pennsylvania in play? >> that's what people are talking about. we always talk about the reagan democrats and how ronald reagan were inclined to disagree with him to suddenly pay attention. i think a lot of people are looking to trump and saying this is a guy who appeals to a very different ek collectic blend of people. people are tired of party labels. they like the ideas, they like his depth and his passion and the fact that when everybody is telling him to be quiet, no, hold up, i have something to say and i'm going to say it the way i want to say it. that's a positive way to do it. >> a very profound anti-establishment sentiment in the country. but people want a strong leader and a happy warrior. i hear from these former reagan

democrats. i have a friend who works on the assembly line in detroit surrounded by union guys that voted democrats all their lives. they're all voting trump. college kids tell me they love trump. >> is there anybody you don't know? you know everybody. >> but anecdotally -- >> she is a weak -- she is a horrible candidate. she's not likable. >> she did well in the debate. >> against what? moe, larry and curly. come on. >> a lot of flip flops. her negative is over 60. we're looking at a different kind of race if we had trump and hillary than one we've ever had before. >> coming up, hillary clinton is preparing to testify before the benghazi select committee later this week. we'll check in with congressman jim jordan. he'll be at the hearing asking her questions. he'll explain what people can expect. then later israel being rocked by a deadly wave of attacks

being carried out by palestinians. governor chris christie will be here with reaction as the administration ♪ it's a calling. a love affair. a quest. the next horizon. everyone loves the chase. ♪ it's the final countdown! ♪ ♪ the final countdown! if you're the band europe, you love a final countdown. it's what you do.

if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. what do you want want to take the loader off? bing. bang. boom. need to connect a mower deck? oh, look, you just did. the 1 family sub-compact tractor with dozens of attachments only from john deere. now, how can you top that tomorrow? that's how we run. and nothing runs like a deere.

see your john deere dealer for great offers on 1-family sub-compact tractors.

(patrick 2) pretty great.ke to be the boss of you? (patrick 1) how about a 10% raise? (patrick 2) how about 20? (patrick 1) how about done? (patrick 2) that's the kind of control i like... ...and that's what they give me at national car rental. i can choose any car in the aisle i want- without having to ask anyone. who better to be the boss of you...

(patrick 1)than me. i mean, you...us. (vo) go national. go like a pro. welcome back to "hannity." so this thursday hillary clinton will be back in the hot seat when she testifies before the house select committee on benghazi. what can we expect? joining me is ohio congressman jim jordan, also a member of the freedom caucus. welcome back, sir. all right. a lot of questions. security was denied before the attack that was requested by the ambassador. a stand-down order, according to the men i interviewed that were there was given during the attack and lies were given after the attack. do you think we'll get answers? >> i do. you characterize it exactly right. there's the before, the during and the after. the before, as you said, repeated requests for additional security. 200 security incidents in libya leading up to the attack. the during, what was ourke? why wasn't it there? questions that are real important questions need to be

asked there. then the whole after the fact, the whole video narrative that we know is false. questions need to be asked there. also this is important. we're going to focus on benghazi, we're going to focus on what happened and the four americans that gave their life for their country that night. but i think the e-mail situation will come up some as well because to get to the truth, you got to have all the information. we need that information that we weren't going to get until this committee was put together and we found some of that. so i think all those things will be brought up. i think it's going to be a long day. she said she'll be here until all our questions are answered because she's only coming once. i think it will take a little while. >> do you thing thk that she's to the committee in the past? will she be under oath for this? >> this is a congressional investigation. she'll be sitting there at the table answering everyone's questions, so yeah -- you have to tell the truth in these situations. we're going to give her lots of

questions and she'll respond to them. >> give me her thoughts with all the stuff going on with the speaker, the caucus and paul ryan. what are your thoughts on paul? >> paul's a good man. a good messenger for our party. i said that many times. he understands policy. but as we've said many times, we think the what is more important than the who. now, it's great if you can have someone that can articulate that message and talk about the conservative policies that we think are good for our party and our country. no institution functions the way the house does. in the 21st century, this idea that some people at top control things through the steering committee, that doesn't work anywhere else. a great piece this week whether he talked about the uber model that's out there, that's the way the world works nowadays. the house has to adjust because it empowers members. by doing that, you create an environment much more conducive to accomplishing what we told

the voters we were gog do, to fight for those policies that we thing help all of america. >> thank you. david limbaugh, fox news senior correspondent geraldo rivera. my buddy david has been my agent for like 50 years, more like 30. how are you. asking david if the checks cleared. >> the checks cleared, wise guy. before ambassador stevens had requested security denied repeatedly. i talked to the guys that were there. they were told stand down after we know they knew within moments that this was a terror attack, and they make up this ridiculous story about a youtube video. this is serious stuff. americans died needlessly, geraldo. >> sean, if the question is what should happen thursday, i think trey gowdy has to put on his prosecutor's hat and he has to go at hillary clinton as if she were the defendant in a criminal case. what did you do? then what did you do?

then what did you do? he has to be very businesslike. but he has the burden of going forward knowing that some of his associate prosecutors, two prominent members of the republican caucus, have undermined his efforts. so i think that his duty to the nation, his job thursday is going to be fraught with peril for him for the republican party. i think that hillary, nothing that you describe remotely approaches a criminal matter. >> no, that's separate from the e-mail issue which we'll hopefully get to the bottom of. david limbaugh, when an ambassador asks for security, why would we deny it. the men that were there on an independent investigation out of langley. they didn't know. they were told to stand down. then a manufactured lie after. to me, this smells to high heaven of a cover-up.

>> yeah, why was -- why were requests for additional security denied in advance of nine 11 when risks were increased. that's an incongruity that they'll have to answer. and why were the specific requests when they were under siege denied. and why did hillary claim that she didn't get that information? who did then get the information? and who issued the order at least not to do anything, not to respond. and if hillary didn't know anything, by the way, if that request wasn't communicated to her, what other requests are not communicated to her? is she never in the loop? is she always out to lunch so to speak like obama is playing golf? nobody knows where obama was during that whole fiasco. but the biggest thing, sean and geraldo, is the deliberate manufactured video lie when they knew at the time, at the very time that this was a preplanned terrorist attack and they claimed it was a spontaneous attack as a result of video --

>> the problem with focusing on the aftermath, david, is that that is a political question. this is a political matter. she's not under oath. you know, susan rice is not under oath. the president of the united states. they argue differently than you see it. i mean, that's an opinion matter. it's not a fact matter whether it was did they really thing it was the video, did they think it was 30% the video and 9/11 and turmoil and tumult? should they have known? they're political questions not necessarily legal questions. that's why i don't think republican expectations that thursday's event will tarnish -- are well founded. >> david, last word. >> geraldo, there doesn't need to be a fine line between legal and political. the political bleeds into the legal, and it's not all just a legal matter anyway. if obama deliberately fabricated a video story and sent people

out -- >> -- a spontaneous demonstration where they just pull out an rpg -- >> if the hope that hillary clinton is revealed as this hard core cynic who cares only about herself and was inattentive, i don't believe that narrative will be supported by -- >> we have to leave it there. >> david, what, why? >> i'm out of time. the wave of violent attacks carried out by palestinians. gove

wow! this toilet paper reminds me of a washcloth! new charmin ultra strong, dude. cleans so well it keeps your underwear cleaner. (secretly) so clean you could wear them a second day. tell me i did not just hear that! (sheepishly) i said you could not that you would! new charmin ultra strong with its washcloth-like texture, helps clean better than the leading flat-textured bargain brand. it's 4 times stronger, and you can use up to 4 times less. it cleans better. you should try it, "skidz." we all go. why not enjoy the go with charmin? get fast-acting, long-lasting relief from heartburn with it neutralizes stomach acid and is the only product that forms a protective barrier that helps keep stomach acid in the stomach where it belongs. for fast-acting, long-lasting relief. try gaviscon®.

for fast-acting, long-lasting relief. romantic moments can happen spontaneously, so why pause to take a pill? and why stop what you're doing to find a bathroom? with cialis for daily use, you don't have to plan around either. it's the only daily tablet approved to treat erectile dysfunction so you can be ready anytime the moment is right. plus cialis treats the frustrating urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away.

why pause the moment? ask your doctor about cialis for daily use. for a free 30-tablet trial go to cialis.com

welcome back to "hannity." tensions are rising in the middle east as palestinian attacks on israel continue. amid the escalating violence, the u.n. secretary general made a surprise visit and called for peace. i sat down with 2016 presidential candidate chris christie to find out how he'd handle the newer situations plaguing the middle east. how are you? >> i feel great, sean. how are you? >> we have palestinians killing israelis after the iranian deal which the president approved this week. palestinians killing israelis and john kerry is making a moral

equivalency between those victims of terror, the israelis and those that defend themselves from terror, the israelis. why do they keep doing this? why do they keep turning their back and stabbing israel in the back? >> this should have been predictable in 2008, right? this president made clear in his campaign that he's going to be a pro-palestinian anti-israel president. i remember speaking to jewish friends of mine back then. and i said to them, you've listened to this guy. >> what part of that did you think was clear? >> just his rhetoric. he talked so much about the fact that there needed to be equity in israel -- in the middle east regarding the palestinians and israel. i don't see them as moral equivalents. >> he goes to the church of gd america, reverend wright. that bothered me a lot. to a certain extent america gave him a pass on that, they gave him a pass on ayers. deeds done in the name of christ

and the crusades, but the future will not belong to those that slam the prophet mohammed. and i don't understand. >> and no one's slamming the prophet mohammed. people prophet mohammed. people are saying if you're a part of radical islamic tr terrorism, that you're part of the problem and we need to kill you. we need to get them before they get us. this is what people do to masquerade their terror activity. >> it's almost a modern day holocaust if you look at the syrian christians being slaughtered. we haven't taken many refugees but this president is going to take in 250,000 refugees. how do we ascertain whether or not they're members of isis? or tied to isis? james clapper says they'll

infiltrate the refugee community. is it a danger? >> it's a real danger. that is why i've been add vocatg the idea and we have to for those folks in the middle east to take these folks in. >> they don't want them. >> i don't think they should give saudi arabia a penny. >> these folks have been running away because of what the president did. he drew a red line in syria and didn't enforce it. by saying if assad kills his people with chemical weapons, we'll take him out, and he doesn't. >> can we just point out if you grew up under sharia, and you're coming to a western country, germany is dealing with this. there is a cultural divide from the get go. i'm not saying it's

insurmountable, but it's difficult. are you going to sit down and they're never going to tell you the truth. it seems that europe is dealing with. there is now a huge backlash there. i think this is part of the appeal of trump on immigration that we don't have control any longer. >> that is why i'm advocating what i'm advocating. we want to make sure they're in a place where it's manageable. i don't know given this administration that it's not manageable. they don't know how to be able to determine this. i don't trust this president and his administration to do it. this administration looks like their aol account was hacked into by the cia director. and homeland security director is having his voice mails listened to. >> maybe would it be a good thing if the free world would unite and create a safe zone, within syria that is protected,

multi national force, offer humanitarian help, water, food, whatever they need or keep them in syria? >> absolutely. we need to put a no-fly zone into protect and protect areas from assad and the russians. >> when we come back, our ask sean segment is coming up, plus, a very important question of the day, straight ahead. ♪

♪ ♪ the beautiful sound of customers making the most of their united flight. power, wi-fi, and streaming entertainment. that's... seize the journey friendly. ♪ it's a housewife who's in control of the finances.

actually, any wife, husband, or human person can use progressive's name your price tool to take control of their budget. and while the men do the hard work of making money, she can get all the car insurance options her little heart desires. or the women might do the hard work of making money. [ chuckling ] women don't have jobs. is this guy for real? modernizing car insurance with -- that's enough out of you! the name your price tool, only from progressive. where is your husband? the name your price tool, only from progressive. deals are made over bacon. global trade runs on eggs.

we've got breakfast for everybody. paleo people. we got sausage and bacon. vegan? i don't know what that is, but we got a lot of fresh fruit. you call yourself a glutenarian? hey, we've got cereal, bagels, toast, everything you can handle. we're insane in the grain! oh, pancakes, huh? i feel you on that. called "squamous non-smallced luncell",er previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, it's not every day something this big comes along. a chance to live longer... with opdivo, nivolumab. opdivo is the first and only immunotherapy fda approved based on a clinical trial demonstrating longer life for these patients. in fact, opdivo significantly increased the chance of living longer versus chemotherapy.

opdivo is different. it works with your immune system. opdivo can cause your immune system to attack normal organs and tissues in your body and affect how they work. this may happen any time during or after treatment has ended, and may become serious and lead to death. see your doctor right away if you experience new or worsening cough; chest pain; shortness of breath; diarrhea; severe stomach pain or tenderness; severe nausea or vomiting; loss of appetite; swollen ankles; extreme fatigue; constipation; rash; or muscle or joint pain, as this may keep these problems from becoming more serious. these are not all the possible side effects of opdivo. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions including immune system problems or if you've had an organ transplant, or lung, breathing or liver problems. a chance to live longer. ask your doctor if opdivo is right for you. bristol-myers squibb thanks the patients and physicians who participated in the opdivo clinical trial. with their airline credit card miles. sometimes those seats cost a ridiculous number of miles...

or there's a fee to use them. i know. it's so frustrating. they'd be a lot happier with the capital one venture card. and you would, too! why? it's so easy with venture. you earn unlimited double miles on every purchase, every day. just book any flight you want then use your miles to cover the cost. now, that's more like it. what's in your wallet? time for the question of the day. do you think g.o.p. in fighting helps or hurts the party? and time for the ask sean question. >> hi, sean, what is your one sentence vision for america? what takes her from brokenness to restoration? it's a question i think most of

the candidates in the 2016 election can't answer for themselves. so, it's up to you. >> that is like an impossible task. how do you fix america? what is the vision. to make it simple, i'm looking for a conservative that has a strong vision of limited government, greater freedom and responsibility with a strong national defense. an america that controls borders, balances budgets, and that has free market choices in health care, there are different aspects to it. i want a candidate with a vision whose conservatism works that will rally people behind them that can get people to vote for them, and win. then, change the country. we need a strong america to have a free and safe world. we need a strong america so people in poverty on food stamps can have a ladder up to success.

it's more than one sentence, but sorry, i'm a talk show host. we'll see you back here tomorrow night.