>> and the president would be the one to shut it down. >> robert wolfe? >> i'm very concerned with gdp and strong dollar in '16. >> i'm looking at the gop and how they split on privacies verse national security. a very important topic. see you tomorrow at 6:00. \s on the buzz meter this sunday, violence in america, "new york times" demanding more gun control "new york daily news" taunting -- >> i've got to say a lot of folks in the mainstream media, a lot of democrats were saying how insensitive to talk about the second amendment at a time like this. let me tell you, i'm not interested in being sensitive to islamic terrorists. you don't stop the bad guys by taking away our guns, you stop the bad guys by using our gun.

>> all we hear from these people is thoughts and prayers, and people keep on dying and dying. that california attack just days after people were killed at a planned parenthood clinic. are the media turning mass murder into a partisan blame game? >> what about the bizarre spectacle of the tv reporters rummaging through the terrorists' apartment. as they play up a republican party revolume that's stopping -- "new york times" reporting that republicans are panicking, they are panicking, running around scared like chickens with their heads cut off, because they are realizing that donald trump could go all the way. >> i have two questions to ask anybody -- who takes on donald trump? and when do they do it? >> we have an anonymous senator

saying this is armageddon for our party, but i'm afraid to saying any. >> no one seems to be leading it. plus rahm emanuel facing calls for his resignation, and a police cover-up a year after, an officer under indictment after he was caught shooting a black teenager 16 times. this "mediabuzz." nltz nltz relies that front page editorial for the first time since 1920, calls for sweeping gun control measures. including banning certain times, saying there's no need to debate the peculiar wording. is the paper declared a moral outrage, a national disgrace that civilians can purchase such

weapons. joining us to analyze the 3450edia role and the impact on the presidential campaign, ed henry fox's chief white house correspondent jim garrity. co-author of heavy lifting, grow up, get a job, raise a family and other manly advise and penny lee. every weigh in, putting the out there on the front page. >> without agreeing or disagrees, this is what big media institutions should do, get their hands dirty on the big issues. people are scared right now. these kinds of -- there's terror, number one, but there is an explosion of gun violence in recent months, recent years, and it appears that or leaders in washington are doing nothing about it. in fairness to the republicans, i think we should press the republicans as "new york times" did, because the republican congress hasn't done anything,

but the democrats to suggest from president obama to hillary clinton that there's some magic formula here, that something on gun control would have stopped what happened in california, that's simply not true. >> i've rarely seen a newspaper one to desperately cry for attention. we know you don't pay attention, also it screamed enhave at the "new york daily news" why is this other newspaper getting attention for attacking -- we can outrageous and controversial, too. >> i think it was absolutely appropriate to draw, as ed was saying, to draw out the debate. to put out that debate forward to the american public. this, irregardless of san bernardino, there have been multiple episodes year in and year out, and the attention -- or a absolute hasn't been drawn, so to bring and provoke that debate was absolutely necessary. >> interesting, in the digital age, it doesn't matter where the

editorial runs, but for the people who read the print device, it was fancy attention getting. if the media is covering this through a tighter lens now, does that help donald trump? >> probably not. but i much prefer a conversation compared to, oh, my god, did you hear what donald trump just said. ? what do you think? this is a major issue for the candidates to talk about as opposed to the controversy du jour of did he say he wanted a muslim registry? >> it's trying to clarify. the president going on -- only the third one from the oval office. after all the media criticism, saying he missed a moment he wasn't reflecting the fears and concerned of the american people, is this kind of a

do-over? >> i think up until that news conference in turkey that you mentioned has given the president a pretty being pass. you go back a couple years ago when he was call isis the jv team, and fast forward to the day of the paris attacks, okay, it was bad timing, abc news had taped the interview the day before, it ran on friday morning of the attacks on "good morning america" but he said we have isis contained, and then over 100 people are slaughtered in paris hours later. the president didn't get a lot of grief about that. he then at that news conference appeared a little listless about the whole deal, but specifically not just appearance, said moo strategy is working, we don't need major changes. look what is going on. >> the press clearly not buying that argument. >> are the media pressing the candidates, as they should in vociferous terms about what they would do? >> i think they they are trying,

whether or not to get them pinned down is a whole other subject. >> how many ground troops -- >> but every time you ask, especially like a donald trump who is very skilled talking around the issues, other than to say good management, just wait and see, i'll be able do it, i'm smart, smart, smart, and he allows that to happen. i think they do have a problem on their hand, though they do try to ask the question, they never gets answers. we saw earlier at the top of the show. clips of various anchors talking about a republican revolt, a so-called republican establishment against donald trump. this sprung from a "new york times" story that there was panic among the gop, because donald trump looks like a serious threat to wince this nominati nomination. why is this a story? >> this should ver panicked a long time ago. if they are panicked now, i'm not say they should or shouldn't

be, i'm a reporter, but wake up and smell the coffee. donald trump has dominating this race on both sides. he's had the republican -- >> there was this refrain in the press, it's a summer squall. >> you know what? the press was wrong and they're probably wrong now, pick whatever you want to say. so i'm very skeptical when el hear this media narrative starting tess numbs information and parroted by all other kinds of people that left, right and center, there's panic, and the republicans have to do something. nobody knows if they'll have the guts to do anything. every republican presidential candidates, starting with rick perry, bobby jindal, they have all gone down. so the pundits who told us donald trump was not for real, saying the republicans have to do something, i don't believe these now, either. >> "new york times" on the el torrie page has really gone after trump vehemently, here's today's paper, front page, news

story, 95,000 words -- >> sun the gun editorial? >> no, this is all about the donnell, a news story in which experts panels, what do you make of this as a news story? >> the dark power of his words, howard. >> there's something occult about it. it's a lengthy exercise, it feels like it's approached godwin's law. you know who else was interested in expanding real estate purchases in germany. they the nefarious words he used? "we." i don't mean the friend yes. i remember yes, we did. do you remember the obama ad from 2012, says mitt romney is not one of us? i'm king of the donald trump haters club. >> a charter membership? >> going back to the '8 ons. it was "spy" magazine and

myself. it was a little unfair that john kasich ad compared them to nazis. he's not the man in the high castle. >> also that mitt romney gave a worker cancer. >> fine to criticize his words, but this language analysis says he's like george wallace, joe mccarthy. what do you make of that? >> again it goes back to the earlier point, this is not someone who sits down for interviews, so they are relying on what they've heard in the rallies, what they have seen and heard from his own speeches. he doesn't sit down for printed newspaper. >> that's not true. >> he goes on television and dials in -- >> trump regularly -- >> he regular his talks to robert cost la at "the washington post" or "new york times." i don't think inaccessibility -- >> he did not comment for this story. when you asks the questions, he doesn't have answers so

therefore they're parsing his words and going through to try to determine who he is as a person based on what they see as far as in the forums and in the larger public and the drive-by run-through television interviews. >> instead of chewing over the sinister details of policies, they go through the sinister implications of the words. how are we going to do it, hour? we're just going to do it this circular logic, half-completed sentences. >> he user "horrible" 14 times, the word "we" 13 times. >> it's been a horrible week. >> it's horrible when terrorists kill innocent civilians, so it's not out of blue. >> one of the lead anecdotes about donald trump's language is a 2-year-old girl at virginia saying i'm scared, what are you going to do to protect this country? i'm not going to defend everything he's said and done, but when a 12-year-old stands

up, if your language is harsh, it's because a 12-year-old is saying -- >> exactly. let me turn to hillary clinton on abc's "this week" this morning with george stephanopoulos, who of course worked with hillary clinton, of course was cry sized for making the $ 75,000 in donation, pretty touch but viewing about her e-mails and what she would do, and played this clip from donald trump. >> she's do a couple minutes in iowa, meaning a short period of time, and they she goes home, you don't see her for five, six days. she goes home and goes to sleep. i'm telling you. she doesn't have the strength. she doesn't have the stamina. >> oh, goodness gracious. >> i guess you don't agree. >> who can agree with anything he says? it's subject to one second of fact checking. >> let's go around quickly.

>> i think it was a great way to see her reaction. it is true. it is a one-minute fact check he's doing. it shows her own ability to laugh at herself. >> shorts answers. >> what a laugh it is. the observation about trump, yes, he does do a lot of televised interviews. how often did hillary clinton do tough, hostile questions? >>. >> not very often, but i think on the fact check part she membersed. she doesn't space it out by six days. she sometimes has a lighter schedule. she's ooh she's far ahead, whereas on the republican side they're fighting for dear life. she doesn't space her sp events out by six days. a little bit 6 an overstatement. you can e-mail us. whether the media are playing a polarizing role after

the mass shootings and a planned parenthood when we come back. . do journalist no longer care? at ally bank no branches equals great rates. it's a fact. kind of like mute buttons equal danger. ...that sound good? not being on this phone call sounds good. it's not muted. was that you jason? it was geoffrey! it was jason. it could've been brenda.

quiet! mom has a headache! had a headache!

but now, i...don't excedrin® is fast. in fact for some, relief starts in just 15 minutes. excedrin®. now available in geltabs.

it was another hillary document dump, nearly 8,000 pages of e-mails, some of them containing classified information, but nothing that the mainsfreem media considered a bombshell, some conservative commentators considering why this wasn't a larger story. >> i don't think any charges will be -- she did pit security in jeopardy, the largest breach in history. >> she cannot escape responsibility by saying these e-mails weren't market.

of course they weren't marked. >> but nobody cares. that's how she escapes responsibility. so the reporting on this was mostly about she couldn't find showtime to watch "homeland." what's your take? >> he has 999 problems and the fbi is one of them. there's now 999 e-mails that had some sort of classified einformation. at the beginning the story, i know the deal, there was no classified information in my server. that was not true. as brit hume was saying, she says it was not marked. in fairness, a lot of officials are say you're being sent real-time sensitive information, of course it hasn't been marked. the point is her server was going around the system that marked things classified or not. at the end of the day is there a bombshell? no, does that mean it's not serious? no, as well.

there was some back-and-forth about her benghazi testimony a couple years ago. >> more documents come out anding there nothing that can be classified as bombshell, and it seems more incremental. >> i think you had every major outlet cover it, at least at some point. so they did cover it. whether or not there was a bombshell or not, there wasn't, so i think people are turning their attention to what is the outcome of the fbi investigation. that is where the focus will be. if on recommendation, whether or not they find anything. if anything is actionable. that's where the story is moving. >> i was surprised that charlie rose didn't bring this up. but he did -- i think that seems to be the media du jour. >> you were surprised, some of us weren't. i'm not worried that grandma can't use the fax machine anymore.

back before she was a candidates remember "new york times" and other institutions were doing good reporting on the idea of the clinton foundation donors getting ashes deals approved, or as countries, state departments of war, she never got asked about those questions. there were a couple old scanned always that still haven't gotten addressed. i would much rather she be asked about that, so you're having trouble with the remote on your tv, aren't you? >> in fairness, those e-mails showing a quid pro quo perhaps on the clinton foundation are not there. is that because there's future document dumps coming on new year's eve, for example? or were those e-mails destroyed? or maybe less nefarious, they do not exist. >> maybe it's purely coincide coincidental. >> i'll expect you tosh working new year's eve for the latest. >> thank you all very much for joining us. ahead, should journalists be calling for rahm emanuel's resignation after a chicago

police cover-up in the killing of a teenager. up next, how are different news outlets covering the controversy over donald trump. our media microscope is straight ahead. when a moment turns romantic why pause to take a pill? or stop to find a bathroom? cialis for daily use is approved to treat both erectile dysfunction and the urinary symptoms of bph, like needing to go frequently, day or night. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medicines, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sex. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as it may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, get medical help right away for an erection lasting more than four hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or any symptoms of an allergic reaction, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis and a $200 savings card jusdoes that mean they have toer grow apart from their friends, or from the things they love to do?

with right at home, it doesn't. right at home's professional team thoughtfully selects caregivers to help with personal care, housekeeping, meals, and most of all, staying engaged in life. oh, thank you, thank you. you're welcome. are you ready to go? oh, i sure am. we can provide the right care, right at home. i built my business with passion. but i keep it growing by making every dollar count. that's why i have the spark cash card from capital one. i earn unlimited 2% cash back on everything i buy for my studio. ♪ and that unlimited 2% cash back from spark means thousands of dollars each year going back into my business... that's huge for my bottom line. what's in your wallet?

it begins from the the second we're born.er. because, healthier doesn't happen all by itself. it needs to be earned every day. using wellness to keep away illness. and believing a single life can be made better by millions of others. as a health services and innovation company optum powers modern healthcare by connecting every part of it. so while the world keeps searching for healthier we're here to make healthier happen. his day of coaching begins with knee pain, when... this is brad. hey brad, wanna trade the all day relief of two aleve for six tylenol?

what's the catch? there's no catch. you want me to give up my two aleve for six tylenol? no. for my knee pain, nothing beats my aleve. we're focusing our microscopic efforts on donald trump. our data comes from the new analytics company which examination at our examine. trump had over 2,000 mentions on november 22nd. that was the day he made those comments, disputed comments about having seen a tv report on thousands of muslims in new jersey celebrating on 9/11. the next day, more than doubled to nearly 5,000 mentions. after dying down over the thanksgiving weekend trump mentions at a people, this tuesday 5,170. not that much change in the tone of coverage. had did drop by seven points, as

this is the day after those muslims comments initial lip. while it bounced around between then and they past wednesday, you see negative in red, positive in green. the average was 65%, 35% positive, a 2:1 split. let's break it down by out yet. anybody which covered him more thansh 65%, cnn 70% negative. fox news a tad higher, 72%. keep in mind that many conservative commutators are major trump critics, abc/nbc/cbs just combined here, and "new york times," 58% negative mentions. all this could fuel the donnell's argument that the mainstream media are against him, but oy counsel, all candidates drew more negative than positive coverage.

this cover ripping -- ig nights a fear backlash. later the politico reporter that offered to give questions to chelsea clinton in advance regrets it, sort of.

they took aim summer tweeting about their prayers for the victims. god isn't fixing this, blared the screaming headline. with that the media politicization was under way. >> i say this -- if you want to line up with terrorists and try to take god away, you're not on the right side. that's all i have to say to the politics who say stop praying. >> just go to "the daily news"

apparently they have a direct connection to god. >> everybody is i think frustrated, everybody is asking why, and everybody's asking what can we do, but we have to do something, as "new york daily news" is not going to fix it. we have to fix it. >> are the immediate qua exacerbating, as the planned parenthood shootings? gayle trouter to contributes to several outlets. richard fowler, host of a syndicated radio show. what do you think of this cover? >> it's the same thing that "new york times" did. they took their editorial put it on the first page. they just did it with a more concise fashion, with one sentence being their thesis. it shows that many in the media assume that gun control will fix the mass shootings that we're having and the terrorist attacks. it's offensive to a lot of americans, because it feels like

it's an attack on our first amendment right, but also the second amendment rights to make sure we can protect ourselves and our families. so richard, some conservative adopt at a timer saying thinks typical of at the media. and suggesting that those who disagree are smog abetting violence. where there's smoke there's fire. the shootings over the past two weeks say we have a large problem, and the media is just highlighting that problem. >> no problem whatsoever with this cover? >> i think the media is pointing on you there's a fallacy in the problems. and we have seen no works. nobody is saying -- i don't think the media or "new york daily news" is saying passing background checks will stop terrorism. i think there's a time for you are to push forward action. case in point, right, when the media covered the selma -- the

protester crossesing the bridge 50 years ago, the idea was by covering this we could invoke action in congress. that's exactly what they did. the media is doing it once again. >> the tone is different to me by a friend of zukerman called it a gratuitous slap at christian -- going further that president obama's approach. erick erickson, the red state founder and fox news contributor took aim literally at this editorial if we can put it up. he posted that online. so in response to richard on this notion that the media are just trying to highlight a problem. >> if that's true, they just wouldn't have highlighted president obama said his thoughts and prayers were with the victims. that's the way it should be.

we should have that expression. is shows their answer is to it one way i think that belies the fact we do want action, and the media is taking sides on this in a very gratuitous way that swipes at a lot of americans. it's distasteful. >> anything gratuitous or swiping at the other side? >> i don't think they're sweeping at americans at all. if you're a legal gun owner and gotten the gun the right way and you are a regular american citizens, that's perfectly fine. i think what they're saying is there's no reason the individual who shot up the planned parenthood clinic in colorado spring or the san bernardino shooter should have had those types of weapons. the reason why they have it is because gun laws. >> san bernardino was clearly a case of a muslim couple who became radicalized by islam, and conservative commutators are, are they trying to thunder this into an attack. they change it to muslim killers

as more information came out. >> i don't think you can look at it in a vacuum. if you look at the past two weeks, you have san bernardino, colorado springs, what it -- >> talk about the way the media are framing this. >> i think there's the problem, because terrorism doesn't know religion or creed or race. terrorism is crazy people acting crazy and acting irrational. that's the same thing we saw in colorado springs and the same thing we saw in san bernardino, crazy people acting out. >> sometimes it's true they see are crazy people acting out but in the case of san bernardino, maybe they were crazy, but this was obviously preplanned in the name of religion. >> it's not crazy. it's a purposeful act. that's why the fbi is investigating it as an act of terror. i think the really interesting thing about this cover is also the business aspect. they knew this was going to be controversial. they got 11 million views on facebook, 2 million views on

twitter. so they were jumping into a very important conversation that we're having as a country right now. >> let me -- with the fbi's permission, with the landlord's permission, cnn and fox news certainly had live shots from there, but were cautious in what they showed. msnbc was on the air the longest, the first, the most controversial. let's take a look. >> come over here, you can see the baby's toys. we have really quite a number of toys. a teddy bear here. >> let's just hold these out. so -- yeah, this is clearly a birthday party that was taking place with the cake and the smiles and it looks like somebody's nice birthday party there. >> let's make we don't see the children -- let's not show the

child, kerry. >> >> okay. rifa sutana farook. i'm going to step away here. >> don't show pictures. >> okay. i take it we don't want to see the pictures. >> we just blurred out that driver's license. msnbc did not. what's your take, gayle? >> apart from the legal issues and investigation issues from the fbi, as a mother i'm just horrified. they're showing personal pictures of children who are in no way implicated in this at all. i thinks it's a -- it's very ghoulish. >> msnbc issued an apology. we briefly regrekt that the -- should not have been aired without review. >> this is what happens when you have a 24 her nour news psych the. every network is trying to get

to the front of the story. >> fox's will carr, who reported from that scene, which was more cautious i. saying he remembered feeling ashamed witnessing a feeding frenzy, hundreds of journalists swarming the apartment and he made a point the not -- and in retrospect he just wished he had taped it, fed it to new york. after the break, we'll examine these same issues. in the aftermath of the planned parenthood shootings, are the media tieing it to to rhetoric. and later, whether rahm emanuel tried to keep the real story of how an officer killed a black teenager from the press. where is my hotel? où est...mon...hotel? we have a reservation. nous avons une...reservation. my wife needs new shoes. mon... preparing to travel can get complicated. switching your wireless service can be easy. just visit your at&t store and see. can i help you? oui. i mean, yes.

it's this easy. they'll explain your options, answer questions. and that's how you shoot a panorama. magnifique. and right now, get three hundred dollars in credits for every line you switch. i can transfer contacts and photos, too. incroyable. see why jd power ranked at&t highest satisfaction with the purchase experience among full service wireless providers. and this is a good translation app. merci beaucoup. right now, aarp members can get a 10% discount on your qualified wireless plan. plus, three hundred dollars in credits for every line you switch. to make your appointment call at&t and switch the easy way.

test. test. test.

test. test.

one question seemed to bounce around the media echo chamber after a crazed gunman killed three people at a planned parenthood clinic in colorado springs. could this be linked to conservatives. >> should those who oppose abortion rights tone down the receipt ricks? >> do you think it got out of hand. >> they cease the rhetoric has -- >> carly fiorina who said falsely that planned parenthood was guilty of harvests a live baby's organs. is it this kind of receipt riggs that's fueling these mentally imbalanced people to act? >> what do you think of the

anchors repeatedly asking whether it could have inspired this attack? >> apart from the legal issue, which clearly it is not, it does seem like a concerted effort to morally shame republican politicians from even talking about this issue, talking about planned parenthood, talking about these controversial videos, investigating planned parenthood at the congressional and state levels. it seems a moral shaming about this very important issues that very much americans care about to say we're not even going to have this discussion, because it might inspied someone to do something wrong. >> richard fowler said it is offensive and outrageous that some are are claiming it had nothing to do with the toxic environment they helped to create. >> i'm in the middle on this one. carly's statement, i think,

referring to in the clip there, she was wrong, right? they were not harvesting live body parts. >> they were talking about it. >> but they weren't harvesting live body parts. this individual, i think his last name is deere, ar, he's a terrorist. >> that's not clear. >> the fbi is investigating it as an act of terror. >> it's not clear. >> the fbi is investigating it as an act of terror, because he's a terrorist. >> it's based on one thing he said to a law enforcement official that is not on record. we don't even know the person is he said this to. >> i think it's guilt by the association. >> that's a double standard. >> that's the double-double standard. when muslims engage in this activity, they're automatically tagged at a terrorist. whether this person does some to a clinic -- >> it's domestic terrorism. >> but it's terrorism. >> what about gayle's point that some in the media are trying to

shame republicans who believe -- or conservative who believe as a matter of conscience. the country is so divided on this, that abortion is wrong, planned parenthood should be defunded. to link that to violence seems to me to be partisan blaming again. >> when you talk about planned parenthood, let's have a debate about abortion if we want to, but abortion is the law of the law 50 some odd years ago. so we can talk about defunding it all we want to, but engaging in rhetoric, saying untruthful things which causes folks to radicalize, it's wrong. >> this can go both ways ben carding said both sides should tone down the receipt ricks. receive pro-life leaders represent him for calling on both sides to do it. >> ben carson comes across as being reasonable, but you just said we should have the abortion

debate. my whole point is the media is trying to squelch the debate. and you should, but other than the you're saying it is tying -- possibly tying into the actions of this person, where there is really no evidence that he was motivated by a political reason to attack these people in colorado springs. >> is the media squelching the debate? >> no, once there was testimony in congress for three hours, the media covered the entirety of the debate. i don't think the media is squelching the debate. let's sigh where the chips fall, but to engage in falsehoods about the organization and a woman's right to choose, that's where the line is. >> it continues to bother me when either side demon sizes this, and i think it's an easy, cheap thing to do. thanks for a good discussion. today, next on "mediabuzz," president obama's former chief of staff tied to an appalling

cover-up in chicago. is the press holding rahm emanuel accountable? but now, i...don't excedrin® is fast. in fact for some, relief starts in just 15 minutes. excedrin®. now available in geltabs. at ally bank no branches equals great rates. it's a fact. kind of like playing the boss equals the boss wins. wow!

i love working in the salinas area becauseriselda zendejas. i always wanted to do something where i could help people around me. so being a cruction supervisor for pg&e gives me the opportunity to give a little bit back to my community. i have three boys. they're what keep me going every day. our friends, families live in the area. and it is important for all of us that we keep our community safe. together, we're building a better california.

rahm emanuel is getting hammered by the press over a police cover-up involving a now-indicted police officers. the mayor fired the police chief after a free license journalist forced a dash-cam video. reporters pressed president obama's former chief of staff on what price he would pay. >> reporter: mayor, you called for the superintendent's resignati resignation. >> reporter: there's a lot of questions in this room about you and your office. >> well, you'll make that judgment. i think i'm doing that job and i try to do it every day in a

professional way. joins us is carol maureen, political editor at wmaq, and column ickes for "the chicago sun times" carol, you were at that news conference, where m o. given the circumstances, were some reporters going too far by asking the mayor whether he would resign? >> i don't know if they were going too far on that. they should know rahm emanuel isn't going to resign and there's no way constitutional replace them. but the real questions and questions that honestly dominating that news conference, howie, is what did the police know and the mayor and when did they finally fell us the truth about what they knew? >> well, you questioned the mayor about the suppression of evidence because without that video, this would not have exploded the way that it did. and he came back and he's done that in subsequent interview totz say, it would have been improper for him as the mayor of chicago to look at the videotape

or evidence while there was an ongoing police investigation. wouldn't he have been accused of tampering in the case if he had done that? >> that's his claim. he said he's doing what has always been done, which includes the daily administrations that went before him. but a circuit court judge didn't see that argument at all. the city police department wasn't currently investigating it. the feds had take at any over. the videotape was the videotape, and it was the judge that forced the mayor to release it, even though the city hall had fought that release for 13 months. >> given your pursuit of this story for a long time as i mentioned, dow believe the mayor and his government, based on what we know, wanted the media to keep them from finding out what happened in this case involving lequan mcdonald at least until emanuel was safely reelected? >> i think there's a reasonable question to that. the mayor denies it. he issued an op-ed today in both newspapers. but look, the fact is that

emanuel has done some good things in address past police torture and other misconduct, but he has not been transparent in freedom of information act requests. has resisted very grudgingly released material here. and the most important thing, howie, the most important thing is right after this shooting occurred, his own police department released a statement saying lequan mcdonald had lunged at the officer, not just the police union but his own police department and the superintendent admitted on our air he knew of that error the very next day and it was not corrected. >> it was freelance journalist jamie calvin who based on anonymous tip kept pursuing that devastating video. you wrote in the "sun-times" you're fed up with the federal government for moving slowly and rahm emanuel reversed himself and now says he welcomes the justice department investigation of chicago police practices. do you believe this delay might have been related to rahm's friend barack obama being in the white house?

>> no, i don't necessarily think so. i think this is -- this is a controlling the narrative thing. you know rahm emanuel and how it works in washington. you control the story and how it's reported. rahm emanuel has always argued, never let a crisis go to waste. the difference is this crisis is spiraling out of his control. he can't control the narrative. and it's going to require a very different kind of playbook, and the public's right to know. >> this really is a classic case of the press eventually belatedly finally forcing some of facts to light. carol marin, thanks very much. >> my pleasure, howie. still to come, how politico got cozy with one of the clintons and why the tale of female meteorologists and a certain dress went utterly viral. that's today?

we'll be with her all day to see how it goes. after the deliveries, i was ok. now the ciabatta is done and the pain is starting again. more pills? seriously? seriously. all these stops to take more pills can be a pain. can i get my aleve back? for my pain, i want my aleve. get all day minor arthritis pain relief with an easy open cap.

.

mike allen politico's most influential columnist now regrets the way he tried to woo chelsea clinton for an interview. as i noted in our after the buzz feature. he wrote to chelsea's rep in an e-mail, quote, no one beside me would ask her a question and you and i would agree on them precisely in advance. i would work with you on topics and there would be, quote, no risk. the interview never happens but he writes in his column it was a clumsy e-mails. as for questions in advance, he says he has never done it, it would make for a boring event. but allen offered to provide the questions in advance which is a major journalistic no-no and make it's look like politico is cozying up to clintons. he interviewed also rahm emanuel the day after the chicago mayor had fired his police chief over the killing of the teenager and spilled the beans on something they had privately discussed bathback stage. >> you take your young people on

fascinating trips around the world to cuba, why? >> thank forz telling everybody what i'm going to do with my family. you had a private conversation with me. now you decide to make that public. i really don't appreciate that, number one. i really don't. can you give me your cell number? i'd like you to listen to amy. >> i apologize for that. >> i don't blame emanuel for his wife amy for being ticked off. mike allen said the mayor didn't put the information specifically off the record and may had been trying to distract people from the police mess. but disclosing a family vacation? it started when jennifer myers in dallas wore a $23 dress she bought on amazon and began to hear from other women. turns out lots of women who deals with overnight lows and storm fronts wear the same dress. myers posted a collage on reddit. it went utterly viral. as one explains, when it comes

to women, weather and wardrobe, it's complicated. >> finding the right thing to wear in our profession is sometimes hard. you're trying to please so many people. there's so many rules. you can't wear patterns. you are supposed to always wear sleeves. only bright enclocolors, someth fitted but not skin. >> it helps to get the weather right, but after all, it's television. >> even if you mess up the forecast, the thing they're going to remember unfortunately if you're a woman sometimes is what you're wearing. >> that's true for men on television, isn't it? maybe not. that's it for this edition of "media buzz." i'm howard kurtz. we hope you'll like our facebook page. check it out. we post original content there, respond to your questions, we have a video feature called your buzz. also check out the sirius xm station fox has 24/7 headlines where you can hear my daily media minute. i have to compress my words.

you can always e-mail us med mediabuz mediabuz mediabuzz@foxnews.com. we're back here next sunday 11:00 and 5:00 eastern with the latest buzz. a fox news alert. the fbi conducts an overnight raid in riverside, california, combing through the home next door to where the family of san bernardino shooter fa look used to live. hello, everyone. welcome to "america's news headquarters." . i'm arthel neville. >> i'm eric shawn. agents say they cut the garage door with blow torches and used bomb sniffing dogs during the search last night. the person who lives there reportedly bought the two assault rifles used in the horrific mass shooting which of course has been the deadliest terrorist attackn