and instagram and facebook and tell me what you think. thanks for watching. remember, i'm watters, and this is my world right here. gugugugu. i'm greg gutfeld. but you already knew that. tonight, why do liberals play down the terror threat following this week's gop debate? we're about to hit them with a back sandwich with expert analysis. putin raises trump. does trump raise putin? what's next, breakfast in prague? is it too much to ask social media outlets to help fight terror? the answer is no. or yes. frankly, i'm very confused. let's get started, america. we've got a couple of truthies. let's welcome tonight's guests. my favorite, aside from

gretchen, tucker carlson. nice hair. she's a democratic pollster and strategist, but we like her anyway, jessica karloff. co-founder and chairman of counterextremism organization. spent a lot of time of prison, egyptian prison. the co-author of islam. probably still drunk from last night, joining us, joann. national review reporter, catherine. to the monologue, everybody. before the republican debaters were tucked into their beds, the media already had their angle. what's with all this isis crap? >> we need to quit arming the -- >> destroy isis. >> destroy isis. >> isis. >> isis. >> isis. >> isis. >> the war against isis.

>> if you drank every time you heard isis, you would be more pickled than lindsay graham at a benihana happy hour. shall if one of the goals of isis is to scare the american people, the gop did them a service. what happened to the real issues? not a single thing about unisex bathrooms, or the growing threat of the misogynist halloween costumes. pets with gluten allergies. pets with gluten allergies. instead, it was this isis thing. isis this, isis that. but i ask, what if that debate had actually been the first one and not the fifth debate? the media would have mocked it even more. but maybe some people would be alive now that aren't. the fact is, if you think terror is the top priority, there's a jerk -- there's a pile of jerks who think you're silly. screw them, i say.

even if they're right. fact is, i am terror crazy. i'm [ bleep ] insane over it. my wife thinks i've lost it. frankly, if you're a neurotic weirdo like me and you're going to obsess over one thing, it might as well be this thing. not cattle flatulence or the hollywood wage gap. we're all worried. it's a shame president obama finds it overwrought. but i guess i feel the same about climate change. let's make a deal, lefties, i won't mock your existential anxieties and you won't mock mine. we can be scared together. and hope that together we all turn out to be wrong. i want to go to you first. am i crazy? have i gone too far? >> you're crazy, yes. what's the question?

>> are we obsessing too much about terror? >> no, i think what happens when we don't have a conversation we should have had a long, long time ago, my fellow liberals and my fellow muslims have been shutting -- unfortunately have been shutting this conversation down. that's what happens when you have young kids, they go to college and can drink for the first time in their lives at 21. they go wild. when you shut a conversation down in this way, and suddenly the gop debate has this conversation, of course it gets out of control, gets out of hand. i want to say when you do that, when you try and tell people they mustn't talk about it, you're saying they mustn't express themselves about this topic. when you say don't think about it, the only people who gain from shutting down conversation and shutting down thought are the theocrats and fascists. when you can't talk about something, it increases closed-mindedness. and the fascists thrive.

>> by suppressing it, it does come out in other areas. it goes underground and you never know where it is. like tucker. i've never met a more care-free person than you. >> that's true. >> are you worried about terror the way i am? >> that's such a wise point. when you control people saying, you control what they think. it's been tamped down. i'm worried about terrorists. i'm actually not worried about being killed by terror, i think that's much less scary about par kinsons's. but i'm afraid of terror in europe. freedom of expression is tamped down because of the lack of cohesion they have there. societi societies, where you have a large resident group that hates the majority. you don't want that. you don't want to live in that world. i'm worried about that happening here. >> jessica, why do you want the apocalypse?

>> give me a minute. access my dumb talking points. it's unseasonably hot out, isn't it? >> nice! are. >> democrats don't want the apocalypse. to your point, it was well put, as was yours, tucker. when people picked on the debate that it was too much, isis talk, that was the topic for the debate. you guys had, like, 75 million of them. i know we're hiding ours saturday night, and no one's going to watch except me because i have to for work. >> technically it already happened, jessica. >> hillary was amazing, she killed it. not in the terror way. what i would say is, you know, you need people to be talking about it. and i think what was really interesting to me about the gop debate on isis, or on foreign policy and terror, was the fact that no one but lindsay graham was espousing anything different than the obama policy. they were just saying it louder. >> what drives me crazy, joann,

is people get totally into terror, and because of the security measures that are in place, people forget about it, because the stuff starts to work and they stop thinking about it. >> yeah. >> no one's vigilant longer than a few months. >> the thing that's scarier than terror is missing the signs of a terror attack. which is what happened in san bernardino. we're like, what could we have done to have stopped this. fear can actually be a great motivator. it's important to be vigilant. yes, while the odds of you ever being a victim of a terrorist attack are very slim. try telling that to a family member of the san bernardino -- >> the face of risk, you only need to be right once. you know? by marrying this mind-set of technology, that one instance could be far deadlier than anything we've ever seen. i hate to say it, i think it's happening. kat, are you scared? or are you still thinking about "star wars"? >> i am never going to talk

about "star wars" ever again. i'm so sick of talking about "star wars." i am afraid. but at the same time i don't think we should be completely overrun by fear. some people really are. for example, you are. >> yes. >> i heard you wouldn't even take the train. >> i actually drove to philly instead of taking the train. during, by the way, a rainstorm that was probably far less safe. i could have died -- >> 100% true. you're an example of someone who is overrun by fear. it can cloud your judgment. on the other hand, we do have obama, who's not just passionate when he talks about it, he seems annoyed he has to talk about it at all. i don't want to get my head blown off, act like you at least care if i get my head blown off. >> i think his care is his katrina. >> i want to address that. absurd as saying as the fifth lord has nothing to do with the force. the force can be used for good.

i liken myself a bit to luke skywalker. but the religion of islam as ridiculous to say they have nothing to do with islamic. they have something to do with islam. obviously they have something to do with it, and we have to talk about it. >> i see myself as roy schrider in jaws. >> and firing a gun into his mouth and it explodes. >> that's kind of how i look at it. at a rally last weekend, chris christie had this to say about isis. >> jordanians saw something about it, when they burned their pilot to death in a cage. other countries in the middle east learned it as they watched their hostages beheaded. on live television. these are animals that we need to bring the fight to. >> anything about that seem offensive? let's turn to my favorite, msnbc host, chris matthews.

>> animals. i mean, call them what they are. bad people. what's this animal thing? >> the -- >> that christie is throwing around? >> i feel such shame. >> you know what, we stopped calling them names, they wouldn't be head people. >> and people ask me why i come on fox and not msnbc. i think we just figured it out. maybe it's a macro aggression to chris matthews. the semantics of what you're talking about, saying that it is -- it does have something to do with islam. we need to be clear about that. to the debate we've been having about how the obama administration and hillary won't say it's islamic terrorism. we're playing such ridiculous word games, with the existential threat the likes of what we haven't seen. >> we should call them daesh, not isis. i graduated in arabic. i will assure you, greg, that

daesh means isis in arabic. it is the exact arabic equivalent acronym. it contains the word islam in it, and the word state in it. you're saying they're an islam and daesh in arabic. >> it's masochistic. who's the first one getting thrown into a cage when the caliphate comes to georgetown? chris matthews. the gay community in paris in favor of la pen. why? because she seemed concerned about it. why is it only the united states? maybe the one thing the americans and islamists have in common is the fruits of our prosperity. they hate themselves. that's fine. just don't impose it on me. >> isn't it an insult to animals? >> why should it matter what we name them? because like piglets, on a pig farm, you don't name them, because they're going to slaughter. it doesn't matter.

let's focus on our real goal, and that's not fighting over words. >> piglets on a pig farm. >> that was impromptu, that was really good. >> thank you. i think about bacon often. >> who doesn't. kat, do you think isis really thinks about what they call it? our enemies come up with great words about us. and we can't. it's not fair. >> no, they don't think about that. they think about killing us, definitely. but this is an easier conversation to have. oh, this word's bad, this word's bad, rather than actually coming up with a solution which is hard. we have to think about the civilians over there, our civil liberties. but it doesn't really matter what we call them. it doesn't matter if it's hard. is this important? we need to figure out to do something, and think of what to do. >> my grand thought before we go to break is, i don't think the mass shootings are actually the goal.

because we eliminated airplanes, right? and so you could either go smaller, or you can go larger. i don't think they're content with the shootings. i think they're going to be going larger than the planes. >> to pass the time? >> yeah, so they figure it out. i think they're working 24/7 on a bigger thing that's biochemical. that's why i'm honestly going crazy. i know i'm going crazy. i might buy the canisters of seeds, you know, that you -- >> i don't know. >> don't you see the commercials? >> no. >> you buy these seeds and when the world gets totally annihilated, you plant it. >> what is the movie from brendan frazier, he's been living underground, and he comes up and it's 1992. >> blast from the past? >> yeah. like that. >> isn't that great? how i pretended i came up with that? the producer whispered it in my ear. >> i was going to say, will smith and i -- >> no one sees brendan frazier movies anymore.

he's put on a lot of weight. i feel bad for him. we've got so much more when we come back. donald trump's week. including a valentine from vlad. a vlad-entine. yeah. sure, tv has evolved over the years.

it's gotten squarer. brighter. bigger. it's gotten thinner. even curvier. but what's next? for all binge watchers. movie geeks. sports freaks. x1 from xfinity will change the way you experience tv.

i like that. another great week for our orange-haired hellcat from planet awesome. latest fox news poll find out the primary voters support donald trump. and then killer of journalists, russian president vladimir putin paid him a very nice compliment. putin hands out compliments as often as bernie sanders trims his ear hair. the absolute leader in the presidential race, donald trump was asked about it on another network. >> do you like vladimir putin's comments about you? >> sure. when people call you brilliant, that's always good. >> again, he kills journalists that don't agree with him. >> well, i think our country does plenty of killing also, joe, so -- there's a lot of stupidity going on in the world right now, joe. a lot of killing going on.

a lot of stupidity. that's the way it is. >> amazing. i have a theory that when joe said, you know, he kills a lot of journalists, trump thought that was a good thing. oh, so you agree with me? >> another trump remark that horrifies everyone in our world. but that tmost people agree wit wholeheartedly. here's the best part about the trump phenomenon. it has woken the rest of us to the fact that the country we lead doesn't agree with us at all. everyone in the press, everyone in washington, the leaders of both parties in the congress, they have this mind picture of their voters. especially the republicans. as people who are pretty libertarian in economics, conservative on foreign policy, that's where they are. that's where the "wall street journal" is. voters are at all. every time trump says something that horrifies them, they expect his support to evaporate.

when he said we need a ban on muslims into the country, they went up by two points among democrats. this is another wakeup call. it's not the country you thought it was. and it's not because you're terrible. the people who run this country are short-sighted, clever, but not wise, greedy, not rooted in this country, the long-term success of this country. they're horrible. so of course you get trump. >> this is something that blew my mind when he said america does the killing, too. that's what norman said, and howard zin, oliver stone, glen greenwald. what the left has to say -- to justify terrorism. he almost said the most left-wing thing you could say. sorry. >> oh, glen loves me. there's a word to describe this. it's called populism. it can apply to people even like donald trump. we have our own in the united kingdom. corbin just won the labor

leadership. he said it was because no one was representing that voice out there. on trump, if you go to some obscure ult channel and look at the comments underneath, imagine those comments come to light. that's donald trump. he's like a person who comments on social media, and says whatever is on his mind with absolutely no filter. >> to me, i see him as a roast comic on tour. the same way, where it's like he sees stuff and says it. and because he's getting a response. he does it more. and it's like a thing. it is like commentary with an audience. >> but until you then headline your own show, the behavior changes. i really do think that trump the candidate is very different from what trump the president would be. and i think you're going to see a lot more leaders who at that time, like putin, would speak favorably of donald trump. because once you talk to the man, one on one, as -- >> how would you know? >> well, gosh, i have.

he really -- it shows why he's such a successful man. he knows how to make other people feel important. and i think that every leader wants to feel that way. >> do you think, jessica, putin is playing him because he flattered him? >> i think so. michelle field said this is the ultimate trolling of obama. what putin has just done. you can play nice with me for like seven years, and i'm just going to go right to the guy that you hate the most and say that i think he's fantastic. >> right. yeah. like hanging out with an ex. >> totally. >> i bet you my car that bill clinton secretly loves trump. >> yeah. he called for him to get in at the very beginning years ago. >> yes. >> he's on the road to the four seasons somewhere cackling to himself. >> and he called up and said, you leave my wife alone. so it only goes so far. >> kat, you know, donald mentioned putin's polls. he's very popular with the russian people.

do you think those polls are legitimate? >> i don't think it has anything to do with it. they're not legitimate. but the only reason that he likes them is because -- or the only reason he likes putin is because putin likes trump. i get it. but at the same time, i understand that sometimes i'll post a status on facebook that i think is funny. and they take it down. that makes me not cool by association. we have trump who is saying, you kill journalists, but you said you like me. just don't insult me. because then that would be really bad. so, yeah, anybody who -- he's the most flatterable person in the universe. completely affects what he thinks about you, whether you like him or not. >> i understand what trump was saying. he's saying putin does things to help his country, unlike our president. that's his justification. i had to remind myself that i work at fox news where half of the people here are guys who have been in war zones, whether it's shep or hammer or leland or

leventhal. they're not desk jockeys like me. so you've got to, as a sign of respect to those guys, that go out there, you've got to say, hmm, that's wrong. >> hold on, slow down. i'm not defending putin. he only kills american journalists. hang on for a second before you mock him. >> i'm not mocking, i'm laughing. >> the world is filled with terrible people. >> that's true. >> they run almost every other country outside of western europe. why is putin at the top of the hierarchy of concern? >> i think he's a pig. but is he the greatest -- >> there are people who are stuck in 1998. or 1988, that they imagine he's our main problem. no, he's actually in effect on our side in the struggle that really matters. >> i agree with you. >> what the hell! >> because -- no, i'm talking about the journalists, when people say i kill journalists, you care about that. call me a trump guy. >> another point of fact then,

if we're going to be correcting things here, america doesn't deliberately target innocent people to kill, unlike putin. there is that difference in trump's comments in that regard. >> yeah. the relativistic nature of it that's interesting. i get it, hierarchy. america, better not do that. all right, all right. is closing gitmo really such a good idea when we're trying to fight terror? president obama thinks so. literal talking points, way to kill some trees, harvard.

my expectation is by early next year, we should have reduced that population below a hundred. and we will continue to steadily chip away at the numbers in guantanamo. >> his version of stairway to heaven. it plays it at every party. president obama still wants to give the heave ho to gitmo. offload 100 prisoners still in there sent to somewhere. not every guy that gets released goes back and becomes a florist. take this guy, al kosi, released in gitmo in 2012. did he become a care colorist specializing in beards? no, he's now an al qaeda leader in the arabian peninsula. in fact, nearly 200 released gitd mo guys have either been

confirmed or suspected of returning to the fight. will gitmo close or will congress stop the president? joining me peter king. he also serves on the house homeland security committee. congressman, my first question is, i want to settle this argument about it being a recruitment tool. is there any evidence of that at all? i've always heard that. >> no, i think the only evidence is in the minds of "the new york times" editorial writers, president obama, and other people on that liberal left who have this fantasy that somehow the real reason why al qaeda hates us, why the jihadists hate us is because of u.s. imperialism, because of george bush and dick cheney, because of guantanamo. it's all nonsense. the only reason they feel they can attack us is because they think we're weak and we're not going to retaliate. i've been to guantanamo. i can tell you there's not an army base in this country, or boot camp in this country where the soldiers are treated as well

as the so-called prisoners are at guantanamo. these guys are playing soccer. they're getting art classes, language classes. if you have to be in a prison camp, this is the place to go. they have, again, this is better than any army boot camp, any navy, marine boot camp in the country. nobody bothers them. they're abusive, terrible. anyway -- >> what about, president obama often brings up the cost. i find it interesting. because it's not very often you hear a progressive bring up the price of something. but it's only -- wouldn't america kind of think that the price might be worth it? by the way, there's nobody on planet earth that wants these guys. we're calling our neighbors. can you take these people? they don't want to take them. in a way gitmo is kind of like a favor, if you will, to the rest of the planet. because we're holding on to them. >> yeah. and you know, all these prisoners released, all of them

have gone through some kind of screening process. almost 30% of them are back on the battlefield, including this guy kosi you were talking about, who is very big in al qaeda, in the arabian peninsula. they are the one of all the al qaeda elements, they're the ones who have tried to attack the u.s. the most times since 9/11. they are the most deadly toward the u.s. isis obviously is a greater power. but as far as wanting to attack the u.s., that's where kosi went is to the arabian peninsula. he shouldn't have been released. >> geraldo, you remember him, started yelling at me, said gitmo was unconstitutional. i couldn't follow the argument. is there any shred of fact behind the fact that gitmo is unconstitutional? >> no. in fact, i think the supreme court has given too many rights to the prisoners at gitmo. they just said some requirements that you have to follow as far as due process. no, it's not unconstitutional at all.

gitmo is under u.s. military. and i'll tell you, they complied with everything they possibly could comply with. i think, quite frankly, these guys are treated too easily there. for everyone we release, we're putting american lives at risk. why the president has this compulsion, it seems to make him happy when he talks about how he's going to close gitmo. that was one of the first things he signed an executive order -- i just wish he showed that same excitement when it comes to going after al qaeda, going after isis. >> before we go, do you think it's going to close? >> not -- the only way he could close it, would be to send those prisoners to the u.s. if he does that, that violates -- congress thoos get an injunction to say he can't do it. >> thank you, congressman king. >> thank you. up next, social network companies have an obligation to report terror activity? or is this an invasion of privacy? we report.

here's my theory. a carmaker is obligated to build a safe car, correct? a restaurant has to make sure your food is cooked fully and properly before serving them to you. so shouldn't social media companies are obligated to report terror activity? if all companies are required to reduce risk and create a safe product, that would make sense, no? democrat diane feinstein and republican richard burr are now proposing a bill requiring facebook, twitter and others to report terrorist activity to police. the legislation, critics say, is counterproductive and could create privacy issues. don't critics always say that about privacy? critics, no one cares about your drunken flirty texts, or stupid opinions on the force awakens. we talked about 1984 for decades. this coming era of big brother spying on us, never, ever will

happen because we're just too boring to be spied on. no one cares about our stupid lives. tucker, you agree, don't you? >> really good point. can i have your password for your e-mail? >> you know what it is. >> you wouldn't give it up because privacy is essential to humanity. privacy versus security. because that is the choice that congress is presenting. we're going to stem the tide of people who will kill you into this country because the statue of liberty prevents us from doing that, but we're going to punish you by reading your e-mails and listening to your phone calls. >> really? >> david petraeus, okay? >> that was a weird scene. >> really? why don't you tell that to denny

hastert? why don't you tell that to el yort spitzer? >> we knew about eliot. >> i'm merely saying they were caught up in 2001 era terror laws meant to prevent al qaeda from killing us, and their privacy ended up being violated and those guys are crucified. >> it's different than having your e-mail read than banning muslims from the country. >> i'm an american, they're not. >> i'm an american, too. it's so cracked. >> let me say, if there's burglaries in your neighborhood, is your response to lock your doors or go out and start shooting people -- >> why should -- >> why should i give my privacy away to protect this country? >> why is everyone concerned about the one terrorist and not the one guy who didn't have a background check?

and got his weapon? >> i don't even know what you're talking about. i don't think disarming me or taking my privacy away. >> no one's disarming you. >> this is interesting. from my perspective, neither banning muslims or forcing facebook and twitter to monitor their users' accounts will make a difference to terrorists. because terrorists will come in and pretend they're not muslims. the other thing is, they'll use encrypted apps based in countries such as germany, which is what we just discovered recently. we'll have absolutely no jurisdiction. even if they are in areas where we have jurisdiction, they'll use levels of encryption like the bit coins. it will be so deeply encrypted. >> what are we going to do? >> what we should do, instead of focusing on the supply photos, why is there a demand for terrorism in the first place? why do people want to become terrorists? that's what we haven't been addressing. as we said earlier, we haven't been talking about it.

we haven't been having this conversation. he who must not be named, we can't even name it. the demand is where we should focus. and we should try to understand how to make sure that the next generation of young muslims who grow up when they're angry, turn to, say, hip-hop music instead of blowing people up. >> oh, that hip-hop music, i think that's just as dangerous. >> yeah. it seems like we have two options that people are spitting out there. either we look at your social media, or we shut down parts of the internet. which will make people more mad? probably not having the internet. however, this could be counterproductive. the see something, say something. if companies legally have to report terrorist activity, they will not be looking for it, because if they miss it, they don't want to be penalized for it. i don't know if it will help us in the end game. >> kat, i think you and i both agree spying is getting a bad name. it used to be great in the cold war.

it was awesome. we loved james bond. >> i'm not ready to give up the liberties that make our country a great place in the first place. >> oh, please. >> and also, this is useless, another way it could be counterproductive if they're looking for it a lot and know they'll be penalized if they don't find it. they could start sending over everything. overrun with everything. my rights are important to me. god bless america. >> i would end on that, even though you are wrong. don't go anywhere. still to come, social justice place mats, harvard university. i've died and gone to social justice place mat heaven. if

you know what brings families together during the holidays? discussions about social justice. that's why harvard university created these place mats for students to deal with relatives who might have a different point of view for them. it includes a flow chart of questions and answers on everything from islam phobia, to black murders in the street. merry christmas, everyone. mar vard apologized saying, quote, we have the right to acknowledge that the place mats

distributed in some of your dining halls failed to account for the many viewpoints that exist on our campus. on some of the most complex issues we confront as a community, and society today. translation, we're [ bleep ] idiots. first to you, kat. you're our micro aggression experts. >> this is one of the dumbest things i've seen in my life. college is supposed to be not teaching you what to think, but how to think. the place mats, you're at a table, having a conversation, what do i think about this issue? they have to say, let's do what my place mat says. i think whatever the place mat says. thankfully i don't have to worry about that nasty thinking stuff, that's too hard. we're doomed. >> i like this idea, jessica. to me, it's like a political ouija board. you know? i don't have to think. it just points me in the right

direction. >> yeah, black lives matter. >> exactly. >> as someone who believes in a lot of the garbage on that place mat, i would say that, it really does everybody a disservice by having the conversation this way. >> yeah. >> have some thoughtful chat in your dorm. don't fire people who stand up for the first amendment. don't let anyone bring muscle in to push you out of the approach. that poop squas swastikas. >> we're like a -- anyway. imagine, is this as bad in england as it is here in terms of this hypersensitivity? >> i'm sorry, i need to consult my place mat before i can answer that question. it's unfortunately actually, england is a lot further to the left on some of this stuff. you've got students on campus, on the one hand, voting for --

these are real examples i'm good to give you -- voting to say, for example, boycott israel entirely. at the same time they will say things like, we cannot pass this motion in the student union that entirely, at the same time they will say things like, we cannot pass this motion in the student union that condemns isis because it will offend muslims. . so there are some absurd positions. i take issue with the word islamaphobia, because we have to distinguish between your right to criticize any idea and your duty and responsibility to respect people. as individuals. no idea should be above scrutiny, just like no one should be above dignity. >> it's so soul crushingly benign and unimpressive.

the closer you look, the more it's just uninteresting, stupid, children with the same nine views. there's nothing interesting about college. >> it's going to be great for your kids, because they'll have no competition in the job market, because none of these people can compete with them. >> well, there aren't any jobs. >> there are 2.3 million jobs in the private sector. >> in walmart, but robots are taking the good paying ones. >> we're missing the real point. this place mat is insensitive to the millions of people that go to bed starving every night. how about using some of that money that you did for the place

matting -- place mats and giving it to the poor. it to the poor. what would

take the zantac it challenge! pill works fast? zantac works in as little as 30 minutes. nexium can take 24 hours. when heartburn strikes, take zantac for faster relief than

nexium or your money back. take the zantac it challenge. ♪ welcome back. greg quit. i'm taking over. no one is sad. so with the holiday season comes many great traditions, and i love them all. but my favorite is elf on the shelf. that's where a cute elf doll gets moved around the house during december to keep an eye on chirp and report back to santa. this gives me an idea. we pitched a new program where we would spend time with fox personalities during their off-air time. an elf on the shelf in real life, if you will. everything went perfectly. take a look. you know, rick, the top of your head looks great. >> thank you. what are you doing here? >> i'm just here to watch you

work. don't mind us. just a few little tidbits. you might want to clean. and also, once they finish that time machine, you could just easily go back to 2009 or miami fashion week, you want to go back to that one. >> that was a good time. >> i hope they pay us overtime. >> me too, me too. >> maybe in like -- not candy. i'm tiring of getting candy. i get it, we're elves, but diabetes is a big problem. >> big problem. >> hey, tom, tom. >> tom, tom. hey, tom, tom. >> hey, hey, tom. >> i hear you. i do. >> do you hate me? because i just prefer if people were direct. >> maybe back off a little bit. >> just act like we're not here. >> you move that little green

hat, maybe i could -- >> oh, wait. there you go. >> you can see now. >> so jasper is a big part of my life, a big part of the show. look at that. the reaction is not as strong as i thought it would be. >> is this where you're supposed to be working? >> oh, my gosh. i do see that you have some booze? >> yeah. >> i understand wanting to watch a buzz at work, but you should switch this. to the e-cigs. >> she swears by them. she once fit 17 in her mouth. >> i'm not going there. >> elves get no respect. >> i feel like everybody i've seen today is not respecting me at all. >> they ear going to freeze our asset s because what, we're fro the north pole? >> i noticed you have a "farmer's almanac" over there.

you have a blow drier and you have a "farmer's almanac." >> drying hair is not funny. >> it is a blow drier. >> is that how you heat up the forecast? >> we won't stand for it. >> we met a lot of naughty people. and i hate to admit it, lou, you are guilty of being absolutely perfect. >> perfect. >> i know it now more than ever. you have no flaws. >> did you see donner lately? >> looks bad. >> he really let himself go. >> i don't know how santa is going to do it. >> i just can't thank you enough. >> i hope all the children grow up to be like lou dobbs. >> that down thanks enough. >> i am so glad we found these shelves. >> an elf on a shelf. >> that was beautiful, both of you. i'm touched. >> the program's not going

through. >> quick program note, we're not on next weekend but back january 2nd, 10:00 p.m. eastern. th tucker, jessica, congressman peter king, joanne, catherine. i'm greg gutfeld and i love you, america. i'm shannon bream, welcome to a special edition of america's election headquarters. the third democratic debate just wrapped up. here's what went down, the fight against isis. >> i have a strategy to combat and defeat isis without getting us involved in another ground war. >> i want a new foreign policy. one that takes on isis. one that destroys isis. but one that does not get us