tv The O Reilly Factor FOX News June 2, 2016 5:00pm-6:01pm PDT
5:00 pm
73% say yes. don't forget to vote on twitter every night. that's all for now. go to my facebook page and like it. see you tomorrow night. 7:00 p.m. eastern. >> "the o'reilly factor" is on. tonight: >> donald trump's ideas aren't just different. they are dangerously incoherent. >> hillary clinton talking foreign policy, but it's all about trump. talking points will analyze. >> well, bill is having a hard time understanding how the senate works. we have explained that to o'reilly repeatedly but he doesn't seem to want to mention. >> senate majority leader mitch mcconnell saying i don't know what i'm talking about when it come tops kate's law. tonight we will challenge the senator. >> i was supposed to fly to nebraska yesterday but i spent the night in chicago. >> also ahead, americans getting punished at the airports. how bad is it? watters found out.
5:01 pm
>> [inaudible] clothes? [ laughter ] >> no spin zone. the factor begins right now. ♪ ♪ hi, i'm bill o'reilly. thanks for watching us tonight. can hillary clinton protect us from villains overseas? that is the subject of this evening's talking points memo. in san diego this afternoon, secretary clinton laid out her foreign policy vision, much of it attacking donald trump as a primary enemy of the state. >> donald trump's ideas aren't just different, they are dangerously incoherent. they are not even really ideas. just a series of bizarre rants. [ laughter ] >> personal feuds and outright loys. [cheers and applause] this is not someone who should ever have the nuclear
5:02 pm
code because it's not hard to imagine donald trump leading us into a war just because somebody got under his very thin skin. >> now, on monday, mr. trump will be here and i'm going to give him one free shot at mrs. clinton for runni that sound bite. he will get 30 seconds. that sound bite ran 30 seconds. i had to do it because much of hillary clinton's foreign policy speech today concentrated on trump. a few times she veered off into other territory like isis. >> we need to take out their strongholds in iraq and syria by intensifying the air campaign and stepping up our support for arab and kurdish forces on the ground. >> same policy as mr. obama. contain isis using air power and weak allied forces on the ground which can't possibly defeat the vicious terror group. it's impossible. they can't do it. there comes a point when american voters must recognize that policies, depending on foreign cooperation, rarely work.
5:03 pm
if we want isis defeated, we will have to lead the way. if we don't, the savages will continue to murder people consistently. secretary clinton also briefly discussed putin and china. but, again, brought it back to trump. >> now moscow and beijing are deeply envious of our alliances around the world because they have nothing to match them. they would love for us to elect a president who would jeopardize that source of strength. if donald gets his way, they will be celebrating in the kremlin. we cannot let that happen. >> so today's foreign policy speech was not really that. it was an attempt to whip up anti-trump feeling in california which the clinton campaign believes will mobilize voters to choose her over bernie sanders next tuesday. hillary clinton knows the world. no question about that. so far i'm not seeing many innovative foreign policy pronouncements.
5:04 pm
she wants to run on what president obama has done, fine. and voters will determine the wisdom of that approach. but, if secretary clinton has any new ideas, they are still being kept top secret. and that's the memo. now for the top story. cracks joining us from washington katie pavlich and boston mary ann march. did you hear any new stuff? >> no. but i don't think today is for it. there is 160 days left in this campaign. time to lay out more policy. what hillary clinton did today was define the general election. define donald trump and define herself. and foreign policy was the vehicle but her weapon of choice was words. and she used donald trump's own words against him and used her words to define herself. that's what today was really about. >> and that's fine. if she had said it was really about that. but what she did was, i got a dispatch from the clinton campaign that said major foreign policy speech. i said oh, i'm interested in foreclosure policy. i'll tune in. and all i got was trump's an idiot. what did you get out out of
5:05 pm
it, katie? >> look, i actually think hillary clinton revisited her reputation of being somewhat hawkish. clear as marry ann stated she was pivoting toward. >> jenna: election. substance. also what she said does not add up to her record on foreign policy. >> how did you see hawkish in there? i didn't see a lot of hawkish stuff? >> she talks in a general way about taking on isis. she talks about taking on our enemy. again, her record doesn't show that exactly what you pointed out in the talking points memo. >> people in my neighborhood saying they are going to take out isis and they have big water pistols. >> they may do a good job. bill, the point is, as you stated, hillary clinton is simply going to be extension of the obama foreign policy which she bragged about today in her speech. >> it looks that way now. mary ann, were you aware that. so language that hillary clinton used to attack donald trump is some the exact same language that jimmy carter used to attack
5:06 pm
ronald reagan in his foreign policy statements in 1980. were you aware of that. >> yes. i actually happened to watch you onhe five and saw that. >> interesting. and the five actually did something good. [ laughter ] >> that's a whole another segment. the fact is i think hillary clinton used this wisely and her real audience. >>, whoa, whoa, whoa. that's not the question. we know you love hillary clinton. you apt to vacation with her. and want to go to the mall date with her. we know that. >> that's so not true. >> her using the same exact words that jimmy carter used against reagan in her speech. >> i think it's fine that she used the same words. >> fine? >> i think there will be a different outcome. >> shouldn't she note them jimmy carter said this. i'm not accusing her of plagiarism but there is a little bit involved. >> i think did you that for her. it was effective way to go after donald trump. the more interesting thing here is bill, what is donald trump's response? i know you have a monday night where were you on monday night? but what does donald trump
5:07 pm
say tomorrow in california? >> she has always been crooked and that whatever country she went to she was crooked in. >> i don't think that's going to be enough. >> mary anne, you may be right, it might not be knows? whoever wins the debate in september is going to win the presidency. that's how close it's going to be. but the fact of the matter is that i would like both candidates, respectfully, to give me more than what they're giving me. i'm not getting anything out of it? >> she has given more than he has. >> look. >> go ahead, katie. >> it's going to be a vulnerability for hillary clinton, especially at a time in the news cycle when the iran deal has been proven to have been sold to americans and the world on a basis of lies that she is telling the touting the iran deal as somehow a success. she can't say she is going to take on the russians when the iran deal has a direct connection to giving the russians a bigger ally in that country. >> what she said was there was no other alternative but war to this iranian deal that trump says he is going to throw away. that's her point.
5:08 pm
speculative but it's a legitimate point in the sense that, okay, you don't take the deal, then it's this big israel is going to do this. and the united states is going to do that. who knows. but, the point of the matter is. >> they would get a burden of proof. >> i'm asking both candidates respectfuy, to stop with the nonsense, all right, and say this is what i'm going to do to protect you from these villains. increasing air power and asking the kurds to fight them, mary anne, is not going to protect us, okay? it's not. and anybody with an iq over 90 knows it she ought to stop saying it and calling hillary clinton crooked, katy, isn't going to protect us either. >> it's not. >> all right? so both of them. >> that's true. >> deep breath. [blowing out] >> letting it out and getting policies that we can actually embrace and discuss. ladies? >> i would agree. >> thank you very much. we appreciate it. next on the rundown, an
5:09 pm
amazing story. the state department deletes a question from fox news correspondent james rosen about the iran nuke deal. rosen will be here. then later, republican senator mitch mcconnell says i, your humble correspondent, too not know what i am talking about. those reports after these messages. don't let dust and allergies get between you and life's beautiful moments. with flonase allergy relief, they wont. most allergy pills only control one inflammatory substance. flonase controls six. and six is greater than one. flonase changes everything.
5:11 pm
when my doctor prescribedbad, medication-an opioid. it really helped! but it came with some baggage: opioid-induced constipation-oic. sooo awkward... you sound like you're ready for the movantalk! opioids block pain signals. but they can also block activity in the bowel, causing constipation. movantik can help reduce constipation caused by opioid pain medications. do not take movantik if you have a bowel blockage or a history of them. serious side effects may include a tear in your stomach or intestine. and can also include symptoms of opioid withdrawal. common side effects include
5:12 pm
stomach pain, diarrhea, nausea, gas, vomiting, and headache. tell your doctor about any side effects and about medicines you take as movantik may interact with them causing side effects. i'm so glad i had the movantalk with my doctor! constipated by your prescription opioid pain medication? ask your doctor if movantik is right for you. if you can't afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. when there were any discussions with any iranian officials? >> let me try it one last way. >> okay. >> i appreciate your indulgence. >> sure. >> is it the policy of the state department, where the preservation of the secrecy of secret negotiations is concerned to lie in order to achieve that goal? >> james, i think there are
5:13 pm
times where diplomacy needs privacy in order to progress. this is a good example of that. now, after that exchange, somehow, it disappeared from the state department's website as well as youtube. >> a portion of the state department's december 2nd, 2013 press briefing was missing from the video that we posted on our youtube account and on our website. that missing portion covered a series of questions about u.s. negotiations with iran. >> here now to explain further is james rosen. we didn't show the whole thing that disappeared. they took a lot more out of it than what we were able to show for time. i think they did this just because they don't like you, rosen. am i wrong? >> you're not wrong that i am not well-liked amongst the senior counsel of the obama administration. i have not suffered from any lack of attention from them over the two terms. but i think that the real reason, the motivation behind this deliberate
5:14 pm
censorship of this key exchange the only known instance of such censorship of white house briefing in the obama terms that we know of was because of the content of it. and the fact that jen psaki had essentially acknowledged that her predecessor, at that podium, victoria nuland, 10 months earlier had lied to me me and the rest of my colleagues about the iran nuclear talks. >> what exactly was the lie? >> okay. so there is victoria nuland. i asked her february 2013. we hear reports of direct secret bilateral talks between members of the obama administration and the iranian government? true or false? and she said of the kind of government to government level contact you are talking about, no. at that time, those direct secret talks were going on for more than a year. once they were. >> why is that important? look, there is no question they did not tell the truth. okay. why is it important? why would they go to the
5:15 pm
extent of trying to get that off youtube and get that out of their files? so, you lied, rosen caught you in a lie. so what? i mean, that's -- then you just go ahead, right? >> nobody here asserts that the person who issued this order for this censorship was thinking or acting rationally, bill. >> okay. so there is no real reason to do it, other than you caught them in the lie, but that was transported all over the country. everybody knew it. who did it? on the five i said i was going to beat it out of you tonight. >> yeah. >> you must have some -- and i don't want to you say this person did it. i want you to say as sherlock holmes might, here's what i'm deducing happened. go. >> [ laughter ] well, bill, i admire your dogged ininvestigative zeal in trying to rubber hose me. that's well placed, i think. look, i'm not prepared to speculate on who issued this order.
5:16 pm
jen psaki has denied it in a very heat email exchange with me that our readers can see in detail on the fox news.com website. marie harp who was the deputy spokesperson at that time has denied anything to do with this. the state department says they don't know who did it but they know it came from within the bureau of public affairs at the state department and they're able to rule out the white house. the state department also says, for example, that they don't have the technology there at the state department building in order to trace all of the calls that came in on this specific time frame to the person who says they were on the receiving end of this order. i find that hard to imagine because when i was the focus of the obama administration's attentions in 2013, including the state department, the department of justice, all of which was well publicized. they seemed to have no problem accessing all the telephone records, all the metadata and electronic records they needed. if they don't have that
5:17 pm
technology now at the state department that would be a diminution of the truth. >> kerry was the secretary of state at that time. did he take over from clinton yet? >> clinton took over -- clinton left in february 2013, just before that critical exchange with victoria nuland. kerry inherited all of this in essence. >> so maybe hillary did it. >> i think, bill, that we are not past the season of disclosure with regard to this. i think you're going to see. >> so it's possible? secretary clinton might have done it. possible? >> well, she was not within the bureau of public affairs at that time but, look, you're going to see members of congress. you're going to see my colleagues in the mainstream news media continue with this story, cnn has picked up on it. the "the washington post." these are not right wing zealots as far as i can tell. >> no. >> and jen psaki is misplaced in suggesting that somehow this is just me wanting air time or fox news going after her for
5:18 pm
ideological reasons. >> i would like to know who is trying to cover stuff up. i think that's important. we will stay on it, rosen. we appreciate it. if anybody is mean to you let me know and i will take care of them, okay? >> okay, bill. >> mitch mcconnell tells a radio guy i am clueless when it comes to kate's law. after that a factor investigation. texting in the car is it killing thousands of americans? right back. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ (whispers rocket) to folks out there whose diabetic nerve pain... shoots and burns
5:19 pm
its way into your day, i hear you. to everyone with this pain that makes ordinary tasks extraordinarily painful, i hear you. make sure your doctor hears you too! i hear you because i was there when my dad suffered with diabetic nerve pain. if you have diabetes and burning, shooting pain in your feet or hands, don't suffer in silence! step on up and ask your doctor about diabetic nerve pain. tell 'em cedric sent you.
5:21 pm
5:22 pm
there was this: >> bill o'reilly was on today. he has a new book. he comes on with me, you know, once or twice a year. and he said he thinks it's personal with you and o'reilly why kate's law, which is great common sense and people are furious about beautiful young woman killed by this maniac, allegedly. why not kate's law? what is holding that up? >> well, bill is having a hard time understanding how the senate works. we voted on a bill that included that. >> sorry to interrupt, but why have sanctuary cities tied to that? why not just make kate's law by itself? >> because we can't pass it all by itself. that's the problem. i wish we had 60 votes in the senate to do whatever we wanted to do. we explained that to o'reilly repeatedly, but he doesn't seem to want to listen. >> joining us now from philadelphia is don giordano. so are you buying the senator's explanation point of view that he couldn't get 60 -- i mean he couldn't overcome the 60 vote threshold to get it voted
5:23 pm
upon? i'm not, because he didn't even try. he didn't try to persuade anybody. i have talked to democratic senators who told me they would look at the bill and seriously consider it. he didn't do any of that. >> no. that's exactly right, bill. no, i'm not buying it more importantly, when i'm in a ring with a guy like, this i'm trying to advance it i went back with him. i was talking about anger with him. and i felt nothing. he doesn't get why we're so angry about this. to him, this is just another thing, like all the other things that are out there in washington. he can't get the specifics. does this man really understand how he couldn't write this? it's exactly what you talk about, i talk about, viewers and listeners are an i didn't about every day. we want something done. this is a great step. only one step. we're not asking for miracles. and if washington can't do this, they don't get it. they can't do anything else. >> now, i just wanted the attempt to be made. and here's why his argument
5:24 pm
falls apart. he says if you have a stand alone kate's law you won't get it attached to the senate. if you attach kate's law to a sanctuary city's law that punishes san francisco there is no way you can pass that mcconnell knew that. he did it anyway and it went down. just take kate's law. put it as a stand alone and let's see which senators are going to spit in the eye of all law abiding americans, are going to insult the steinle family. let's see them. and mcconnell didn't lead on it or anything. >> no. he didn't. and i pursued that, bill. i can't believe there are not five or six. >> there are. there are. >> told me they would go with this. >> that's right. >> then we get into other motivations. part of the motivation is personal. he called you an entertainer. these guys call me that locally a politician did just yesterday. when they can't handle us, when it's wrong. when we are angry in who we represent, we are just a bunch of entertainers we don't know what's going on in washington. >> i was going to give him a list of democratic senators
5:25 pm
whom i have talked with who would consider kate's law. all i want to do is get them on the phone and i have called almost -- every time i call a politician, they get on the phone with me. it's a matter of respect. it's off the record. i'm not going to deal with it on my program. we have made that quite clear. he wouldn't even get on the blanking phone with me, this guy. that's how he is. >> when i asked about that, he said well, a lot want to tal, we're not just going to talk to everybody. >> yeah, i know. >> it's remarkable the arrogance around this. bill, i know a couple of these senators, bob casey jr. of my state. i think he is a guy who is reasonable. >> absolutely. >> there were enough pressure, if it were public. sometimes the right thing is also good politics. this would be good politics. >> lead. lead. persuade. >> right. exactly. >> that's what ronald reagan did. all right. he led. he persuaded, he put it forth to the american people. he built consensus so that
5:26 pm
kate's law would have to pass. you are right. you hit it right on the head. he doesn't care. he doesn't care about it. it's just another thing for him. it's annoyance for him. and that's why people are so angry and that's why donald trump has risen because they are angry with the mcconnells of the world. >> make this point, too. i had talked to mcconnell. very moving. he had polio as a child. i thought he was showing emotion he talked about his mother and all those things. yet, he still couldn't bring him to this to feel this. >> dom, thank you very much for having me on your program. thousands of americans dying in their cars because they're texting. our truth serum correspondent on the case. and president obama once again going after fox news. dana perino has some thoughts on that. we hope you stay tuned to those reports. with my diabetes. i do my best to manage. but it's hard to keep up with it. your body and your diabetes change over time. your treatment plan may too.
5:27 pm
know your options. once-daily toujeo® is a long-acting insulin from the makers of lantus®. it releases slowly to provide consistent insulin levels for a full 24 hours. toujeo® also provides proven full 24-hour blood sugar control and significant a1c reduction. toujeo® is a long-acting, man-made insulin used to control high blood sugar in adults with diabetes. it contains 3 times as much insulin in 1 milliliter as standard insulin. don't use toujeo® to treat diabetic ketoacidosis, during episodes of low blood sugar, or if you're allergic to insulin. allergic reaction may occur and may be life threatening. don't reuse needles or share insulin pens, even if the needle has been changed. the most common side effect is low blood sugar, which can be serious and life threatening. it may cause shaking, sweating, fast heartbeat, and blurred vision. check your blood sugar levels daily while using toujeo®. injection site reactions may occur. don't change your dose or type of insulin without talking to your doctor. tell your doctor if you take other medicines and about all your medical conditions. insulins, including toujeo®, in combination with tzds (thiazolidinediones)
5:28 pm
may cause serious side effects like heart failure that can lead to death, even if you've never had heart failure before. don't dilute or mix toujeo® with other insulins or solutions as it may not work as intended and you may lose blood sugar control, which could be serious. ask your doctor about toujeo®. man, it's like pure power at your finger tips. like the power to earn allstate reward points, every time i drive. ...want my number? and cash back for driving safe. and the power to automatically find your car... i see you car! and i got the power to know who's coming and when if i break down. ...you must be gerry. hey... in means getting more from your car insurance with the all-powerful drivewise app. it's good to be in, good hands. if you then you'll know howuth, uncomfortable it can be. but did you know that the lack of saliva can also lead to tooth decay and bad breath? well, there is biotene,
5:29 pm
5:30 pm
to make getting here easy. of flight combinations because the hardest part of any trip, should be leaving. expedia. technology connecting you to what matters. truth serum segment tonight. new study released by the aaa foundation says 59% of car crashes involving teenagers involve some kind of texting or cell phone distraction including talking. some states have laws against using a cell phone while driving for any reason but most do not. with us here in new york city are arthur neville and eric shawn. >> last monday to labor thousand americans killed on the roads in crashes caused by teenagers drivers. as you said, the majority, 60% are distracted by doing that they are texting. they are on their cell phone or talking to their friends
5:31 pm
in the car. 15% by talking to friends or distracted by passengers. 12% by cell phone texting. although the kids get the message all the time don't text, don't talk on your cell phone when you drive. >> right there. have been grizzly commercials put on the air. but the lure and addiction of these things is so powerful that if you get a ping in the car, then you reach for it. but i understand that traffic accidents and fatalities of all americans are on the rise. is that true? >> about 30,000 americans are killed every year. it's slightly up. the texting and the kids are up 16%. so it's getting worse with the kids. a.a.a. did a study last year. they showed that 70% of the kids admit that they talked on the phone while they drive. 70%. 42% read a text. 30% actually text while they drive. and they did a study. there is something called the live text drive cam. if you are a parent or grandparent i think you had should get this. this is a video. this is what the university of iowa researchers did.
5:32 pm
studied videos. record 12 seconds. they lock at the last six seconds of the crash and they could see what the kids were doing. 14.6% talking to passengers. kids are joking around. 12% the cell phone. 10.7% they called attending the vehicle. like what if your soda spills? what if you just want to look for something or change the dial on the radio? that's sadly getting people killed. >> now, i think all states should have you can't text and drive. you can't talk on a cell phone. you know, in your hand. you can talk, you know, put it on the dashboard because they have technology to do that i think all 50 states should have that. >> but they don't. >> they don't. >> 39% ban a cell phone if you are under 18. 46% ban texting while you drive. but like arizona, texas, missouri, they don't have these laws against the texting or driving. >> all right. now, there is a website called back page.com. and it is forefront in human trafficking, underaged sex. perverts who want that go to this website, then they get
5:33 pm
the hookups. they abuse the children, and now it's becoming a major deal in federal circles. what is the story. >> in the story is in march the senate vote to do hold the coe of this website carl in contempt of congress because he didn't show up for a senate hearing about online sex trafficking. the senate also subpoenaed back page for internal company documents. they wanted to know how they are overseeing these ads for underage sex and how much money, exactly, they are making on these ads. now, of course, i shouldn't say of course but factually backpage did not respond. >> let me stop you the guy did not respond to a subpoena to show up to testify. >> that's correct. >> they didn't respond to a subpoena to provide documents about what they are doing. can he be put in jail for that? i believe he. >> at this point we have a statement from his lead counsel because she is saying that his first amendment and constitutional rights are being violated. so this is a partial statement from liz macdougall. she is saying for nearly a year backpage.com
5:34 pm
respectfully asked the senate permanent subcommittee on investigations to submit these questions to the federal court for resolution and, finally, it did. backpage now looks forward to an opinion on these key constitutional issues. >> they want to petty fog the issue by putting it in another place. they're not going to respect the senate and show up and give the documents. >> there is a court hearing not yet to be date settled on. they will try to get this guy to go to court, the senate is. >> in your opinion, miss neville, this is a 71% of suspected child trafficking reports emanate from this website. 71%. so this is a website should be shut down. >> it's despicable. in my opinion it's despicable. if you are selling young kids. >> that's what they are doing. there is no doubt about it. >> you just read the stat. i have the same stat. according to the u.s. senate that's what they are doing. there is absolutely no place for this. >> the federal government should be able to go in and shut it down with a court order and then they litigate from there.
5:35 pm
>> but here's the thing. last word, quickly, this guy has websites set up that you can access this from all over the world. >> yeah. is he a weasel. >> is he a complete weasel. he lives right now in amsterdam. >> amsterdam, holland. okay. thank you very much. one quick footnote on april 22nd i said that prince likely died from a drug overdose. today that situation confirmed by the a.p. apparently the pop singer died from using too many opioids. dana perino has thoughts on it "watters world" the airport edition. >> you know they can see you naked on the body scanners. >> i don't know what they are going to get out of it. >> those reports moments away. ♪
5:36 pm
5:37 pm
with once-weekly trulicity. trulicity is not insulin. it helps activate my body to do what it's supposed to do release its own insulin. trulicity responds when my blood sugar rises. i take it once a week, and it works 24/7. it comes in an easy-to-use pen and i may even lose a little weight. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable prescription medicine to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes. it should be used along with diet and exercise. trulicity is not recommended as the first medicine to treat diabetes and should not be used by people with severe stomach or intestinal problems or people with type i diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. trulicity is not insulin and has not been studied with long-acting insulin. do not take trulicity if you or anyone in your family has had medullary thyroid cancer or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2 or if you are allergic to trulicity or its ingredients. stop using trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of an allergic reaction, such as itching, rash, or difficulty breathing;
5:38 pm
if you have signs of pancreatitis such as severe stomach pain that will not go away and may move to your back, with or without vomiting or if you have symptoms of thyroid cancer, which may include a lump or swelling in your neck, hoarseness, trouble swallowing, or shortness of breath. medicines like trulicity may cause stomach problems, which could be severe. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and any medicines you take. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin may increase your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite, and indigestion. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may cause kidney failure. with trulicity, i click to activate what's within me. if you want help improving your a1c and blood sugar numbers with a non-insulin option, click to activate your within. ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity.
5:39 pm
.... thanks for staying with us, i'm bill o'reilly. in the unresolved problem segment tonight u the economy. as you may know, there are two theories about your financial well-being. president obama and the democrats say he saved us from a great depression when he took over in 2009. but republicans and some independents believe that's bull. that for seven and a half years the president has strangled the economy by imposing high taxes and
5:40 pm
stringent business regulations including obamacare. yesterday in eckha, indiana, the president said this about his critics. >> so their basic story is america's working class, america's middle class, families like yours have been victimized by a big bloated federal government run by a bunch of left-wing elitists like me. and the government's taking your hard-earned tax dollars and it's giving them to free loaders and welfare cheats and i haven't turned on fox news or listen to do conservative talk radio yet today but i have turned them on enough over these past seven and a half years to know i'm not exaggerating in terms of their story. >> with us now here in new york city dana perino. so you used to work for a president, right? >> yes. >> and your guy, bush the younger, had said something like that, blamed a network for spreading propaganda about the economy. would you have been surprised? >> well, president bush never did that.
5:41 pm
>> never? >> he never uttered the call letters of a network. >> never? not even wkrp in cincinnati? [ laughter ] >> i loved that show. i loved that show. president bush would draw a contrast though. like he would say here's my record and he would say, you know, he might use a similar rhetorical device like president obama is doing compare and contrast. i think president obama got several things wrong yesterday. i understand where he is coming from from his perspective. i think the republicans have a good case to make that with economic growth at 2%, the weakest recovery of any recession. >> but he blames your guy for that he says that -- the comply was such dire straits when george w. bush was in office that this was the best i could do but i did save us from armageddon. that's the fall back and the democratic party has embraced that. >> the other thing he does he goes to indiana where the republican governor pence, and the state legislature
5:42 pm
have a lot to do with it. taxes pretty low. a lot of people moving from illinois into indiana because of the high tax situation. plus, president obama sees the economy and government policies. republicans are not attacking him when they talk about smaller government. republicans actually believe in smaller government. >> let's be fair. i mean, barack obama gets worked over on talk radio in some precincts here on the fox news channel pretty hard. >> yes. >> now, i haven't heard a lot of the welfare queen lay about stuff. >> it's out there sometimes. >> it's out there. i will touch upon it once in a while. but it's not a major issue. the major issue is when you have a close sis like obamacare that tells small business that you have to hire certain amount of people and pay for their insurance you will have less people hired and drive down salaries. that's where the concentration of criticism has been. >> remember, also, it was the democrats who tried to paint paul ryan as somebody who want to do push granny over the cliff. remember the video saying that basically republicans
5:43 pm
only care about rich people. not true. >> well, that's been going on forever. >> hyperbole happens on both sides. republicans have a pretty good case to make. >> i think though that president obama sincerely in his heart believes that fox news wants to could him i will. >> he has thought that from the very beginning. >> right. >> and it's unfortunate. but also he uses it as a foil. if you listen to that tape, again, the audience laughs and jeers when he says fox news. so he has used it to his benefit as well. >> but, is it -- look, we, to be honest, you have to be honest. we are absolutely the toughest on president obama of all the >> definitely. >> there is no question about it. but, we bring in people like juan williams, i can name 50 of them, alan colmes, hun and on and on and on, to put forth his point of view. and it doesn't seem to me that there is a jihad against him here. talk radio might be a little
5:44 pm
bit different on that. but, he certainly has an obsession with us. last word. >> president obama doesn't make a distinction between commentary and reporters. >> no. but nobody does. >> i do. >> you do. but in the democratic party, in the liberal precincts, they don't make that -- you work for fox news. >> they call it the liberal mainstream media. >> we're all guilty. >> we are guilty of hyperbole. word of the day, everyone. dana perino, thank you very much. watters on deck. chaos at the airports. he will sort it all out when we come right back. i have asthma... ...one of many pieces in my life. so when my asthma symptoms kept coming back on my long-term control medicine. i talked to my doctor and found a missing piece in my asthma treatment with breo. once-daily breo prevents asthma symptoms. breo is for adults with asthma not well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. breo won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. breo opens up airways
5:45 pm
to help improve breathing for a full 24 hours. breo contains a type of medicine that increases the risk of death from asthma problems and may increase the risk of hospitalization in children and adolescents. breo is not for people whose asthma is well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. once your asthma is well controlled, your doctor will decide if you can stop breo and prescribe a different asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. do not take breo more than prescribed. see your doctor if your asthma does not improve or gets worse. ask your doctor if 24-hour breo could be a missing piece for you. see if you're eligible for 12 months free at mybreo.com.
5:46 pm
man 1: i came as fast as i man 2: this isn't public yet. man 1: what isn't? man 2: we've been attacked. man 1: the network? man 2: shhhh. man 1: when did this happen? man 2: over the last six months. man 1: how did we miss it? man 2: we caught it, just not in time. man 1: who? how? man 2: not sure, probably off-shore, foreign, pros. man 1: what did they get? man 2: what didn't they get. man 1: i need to call mike... man 2: don't use your phone. it's not just security, it's defense. bae systems.
5:47 pm
5:48 pm
removed because it's taking passengers hours to get through security lines in many airports. the situation is so bad thousands of people are missing their planes. so we sent watters out to newark airport in new jersey to take a look. ♪ ♪ ♪ >> tough time at the airport? >> yes. >> why don't you just drive? >> you're right. [ laughter ] >> where are you headed to? >> i'm head to do texas for the weekend. >> oh. romantic get away? >> yes, actually. >> everything is bigger in texas, they say. >> i hope so. [ laughter ] >> let the games begin. hello. >> where are you coming from. >> i'm coming from detroit. >> are you going back to detroit? how was your flight experience? >> not very good. >> what happened? >> i was supposed to fly to nebraska yesterday and i spent the night in chicago with hundreds of other people. >> chicago is a mess, isn't it? >> yes, o'hare is
5:49 pm
disgusting. >> i can reserve you a flighted coming back from chicago 5:55 does that help. >> hi, i'm earth. have we met. >> how was your flight experience? >> it's terrible. >> what happened. >> the flight crew was late getting on our flight which caused us to miss our layover. we should have already been in mantok like three hours ago. >> well, that's wife. >> control was a bit dodgy. >> roger. >> what's the longest time have you ever waited in security? >> i have waited over two hours here at newark airport and the competence was very frustrating. >> right now not so good. >> did you set off the beep when you went through. >> yes. just went through too fast. >> do you have a problem going too fast? do you like to take things slow? >> yes. i like to go a steady pace. i don't like to rush. >> so you are going to love the lines here at the airport. >> yeah. i'm going to love it enjoy every moment. >> just traveling through the airport. it's kind of -- the distance you have to go. >> you have got to flag down
5:50 pm
one of those people that can wheel you around with the carts. >> with the carts, right. >> that's what i do. ♪ >> wait. >> we got there three hours early so that's the key. >> what did you do that whole time? >> drank. [ laughter ] >> drank martinis. >> are you muslim? >> yes. >> what's it like being muslim going through airport security? >> i look at it for security for us too as well. we are proud to be americans. born and raised here. i'm just as patriotic and even more patriotic than anybody else ♪ o say can you see ♪ >> do you mind if i check what's in the bag? we're doing some extra screening procedures. [ laughter ] >> you can pop this for me? you dress in women's clothes? is that your cover? [ laughter ] >> he thinks he is ethel murman. >> you'll be swell, you'll be great ♪ going to have the whole world on a plate. >> did t.s.a. grope you. >> not this time, no. i have been groped before though. >> whoa.
5:51 pm
>> you know they can see you naked on the body scanners. >> i don't know what they are going to get out of it. >> i do now, yes. >> does that make you uncomfortable? >> no. i'm going on a romantic get away, remember. >> do you have anything inappropriate in your luggage. >> no. but hopefully my partner does in his. >> this ain't my bag, baby. >> do you know what's fun to do in line while you wait? >> what's fun? >> watch "watters world" on your phone. >> what is that? ♪ >> i got a flight to catch. >> i say go away, boy, you bother knee. >> do you want to do the "watters world" thing? >> mr. watters and this is your world. >> this might seem crazy, but he and i actually have a lot have a lot in common. so -- >> yeah. it's true. . >> right. maybe i should. >> americans have been
5:52 pm
remarkably crazy, have they not? we haven't seen fights break out or riots. that poor woman, she doesn't want to be in chicago. >> if you ever flew commercial, you would know but you fly private. >> i still fly commercial but i have a pass. really, this is wrong. it's wrong. and it should be solved by the federal government. if you have to streamline, streamline. nobody wants safety to be compromised but this is insane. it really is. it's an intrusion. and then you get on a plane that's built for the wizard of oz munchkin. >> why are you complaining about airport lines? you flown commercial. >> a month ago. but the seats are very, very tiny. >> because you're 6'6". >> right. but they are tiny if you're
5:53 pm
5:54 pm
5:55 pm
for pain relief that can last into the morning. and now... i'm back. aleve pm for a better am. big victory for us. but first, we'd like to thank all of you for making "legends & lies" outsold every book last week. its hardcover is number one at barnes & noble. this begins sunday evening right here on fnc at 8:00. >> that's him! >> get him! >> get him! >> for the rule of the crown and
5:56 pm
the protection. >> i will blow through this mob. if you continue to interfere in the king's business, i will be first to defend him. >> a warning shot across the bow. >> first episode will feature samuel adams, a wild and crazy guy, old sam, as well as paul revere. we hope you check it out, the book and the series. get "legends & lies" free of charge. trump gets testy. he calls a reporter a sleaze and
5:57 pm
others scum. what if dethat to you, bill? >> well, i believe he told me to see a psychiatrist. "bill, the only person blasting trump for criticizing the media are you and other elitists." i believe i blasted trump on that. i explained what happened. chris, new york, "please chuck geraldo off the factor." "bolling is a kool-aid drink." "the killing of a defenseless animal is news." but the chicago slaughter is a national disgrace and underreported by the press. roger, orlando, florida, your tip left out the fraud of
5:58 pm
cameras at stoplights. not only is it a big money maker for the cities, you have to pay the fine even if you're not driving the car. that's right. they get your plate even if your brother is driving, you've got to pay it. diane williams, new jersey, i bought "legends & lies for my 14-year-old grandson but he'll have to wait until i finish it. very, very interesting." i appreciate that. "you and miller were certainly mainly-men at the who wants to be a president show in florida." were you surprised in manly men. tickets for the four remaining who wants to be president shows make exceptional father's day gifts. denver, atlanta, at the fox theater in buloxi, mississippi. in may, we were the top rated cable news program in the country by far.
5:59 pm
that's been the situation since december 2000. 15 1/2 consecutive years. now, here's a tip. we're smart enough to know that it is you, the factor viewer, who propels our success. we always keep you in mind when we're putting this program together each day and executing it on the air. we don't pander. you know that. but we are aware that you are watching. respecting people loyal to you is a good thing. and that is it for us tonight. please check it out. "the factor" website different than o'reilly.com. name and town if you wish to opine and here is another word of the day, tome, is the first one. please know impiety when writing to "the factor." it's a little delicate.
6:00 pm
again, thanks for watching us tonight. please remember, the spin stops right here. definitely looking out for you. breaking tonight, donald trump under fire at this moment for an unbelievable shot at an hispanic judge hearing the fraud case for him. first, a no-holds bar preview. good evening and welcome to a busy "kelly file." good evening. i'm megyn kelly. building over this past week in culminating today the two front-runners fiercely attacking the other's qualifications to be the next commander in chief. just hours ago in a highly anticipated speech in california, mrs. clinton delivering a nearly
186 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Fox News WestUploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=1809449327)