. right now on "justice," can english history lead to american history? >> it's always the will of the people. ultimately, that wins out. >> tonight, i'll tell you why the brexit shocker will cause a ripple effect that donald trump can ride right into the white house. plus, sheriff david clark is here to lay down the law. we'll tell you why this week's verdict in the freddie gray case was the right decision. and later -- okay, what do you think of the congressional sit-in? >> it's a start. >> it's a start? no, it's a stop! it's not a start!

>> democrats sit in the capitol while i walk the streets of america. street justice takes on the congressional sit-in. >> they're admitting they're doing nothing but sleeping. >> wake up! "justice" starts now. hello and welcome to "justice." i'm judge jeanine pirro. thanks for being with us tonight. first my opening statement. what happened in england is going to happen again. next stop, the united states. next president, donald j. trump. what happened in the uk this week is just the beginning. the world is changing and all you elite establishment, ruling class, condescending, washington big wigs who think you know better than ordinary americans are out. start packing. your days are numbered.

now, i told you this election was a revolution, but even i didn't know how big it would be. it's worldwide. the headlines scream it. the working class who toil every day to pay their rent and put food on their family's tables are tired of being lectured by the fat cats in washington and brussels, who breach what we need and when we need it. the brits in a monumental upset made their voices heard this week, voting to exit the european union. you know, the place with open borders, the one that's being run over -- overrun by immigrants, as they watch their economies falter? similarly, americans fed up with this "we are the world" song and dance will catapult donald trump to the white house. >> i think people really see a big parallel. a lot of people are talking about that. and not only the united states, but other countries.

people want to take their country back, they want to take their borders back, they want to take their monetary back, they want to take a lot of things back. they want to be able to have a country again. so i think you're going to have this happen more and more, i really believe that. i think it's happening in the united states. people want to see borders. they don't necessarily want people poring into their country that they don't know who they are and where they come from. they have no idea. >> news flash! we don't want an internationalist country. we don't want world banks, globalization of our economy, a country with no border and no identity. you are not allowed to change the identity of this country. americans want a nation state. our country with a history of freedom is combined with a history of responsibility. and yet our proud history, even our money is being rewritten to

accommodate a new world view. we are so beaten down by political correctness that most of us are numb to the surrender of america. and as for those naysayers, the one who say, donald trump just can't win, listen up. those naysayers in england got it all wrong, didn't they? prime minister cameron got it all wrong. you know, the one who criticized donald trump for his temporary ban on muslims. and now cameron's out. obama, too, got it all wrong, jetting to england, as if he were the world's dictator, telling the brits what's good for them. and while we're at it, hillary clinton got it all wrong on just about everything, except her bank account. when the president of the united states, a country founded on the judeo-christian ethics, tells

christians at a prayer breakfast, no less, to get off their high horse, after christians get their heads cut off, not even willing to mention islamic extremism, when the president of the united states allows hoards of immigrants, whose names, let alone, backgrounds we don't even know, while isis proudly announces that their infiltrating these refugees, when states are not even notified who the federal government is sending to live in their neighborhoods, flying in unknowns from central america and the middle east, en masse, and they demand sharia law in place of american law? then we are in the wilderness, folks. and i don't want to hear that americans need to be more humble. that we need more humility. that my free speech needs to be tamped down, so as not to offend another's religion. nowhere does our constitution say we cannot say something

about another's religion. nowhere does our constitution say we cannot say anything that offends others. and by the way, where does it say i can't have a gun. do not use our constitution against us. while you use the same constitution to shield those who violate our laws, showering them with all the rights and benefits, but none of the responsibilities. when our president's first response to an american getting his head cut off is to show up in a golf cart and keep on golfing, when he and his attorney's response to americans being killed by muslim terrorists is to stand up for muslims, then it's time to take our country back. and don't tell me that to not take these people in is not who we are. i know who we are. my grandfather was a part of the greatest generation, that stormed that beach in normandy.

my dad saw the plume in nagasaki, and later died earlier because of it. no, you don't preach to me. i know who we are. and i know who i am. i am an unapologetic nationalist. i am an unapologetic american. and that statute of liberty that says, "give me your tired and your poor and your huddled masses," we never had a problem taking them in from the beginning. we're the most generous country in the world. as a judge, i've sworn in newly naturalized citizens for years and have never been more proud of immigrants and america. but they do it legally. they have to swear allegiance to america, follow our laws, and they cannot be exempt from arrest because of their illegal status, as they now are in sanctuary cities. even the supreme court had to

stop the president who attempted to ban the deportation of 4 million illegals and give them an automatic right to work here. folks, when a man running for president proudly carries with him the sword of socialism, and when a woman running for president accepts money from countries that kill gays and stone women to death, for her family's so-called charity, when their holdings are invested in the cayman islands and her husband is middle man to some of the world's biggest deals, as they feather their nest at the expense of america, it is time to take the country back. so, no, i don't believe in globalization. i don't believe in this internationalist mumbo jumbo hogwash. i don't believe in self-denigration. i believe in our nation state. i believe in our borders. and i believe in the law the constitution and the declaration of independence that outlines

the character of the people and who we are. every week, i speak to you in front of a backdrop, but it's so much more than that. it's the american flag. it represents the spilled blood and treasure of those who gave up everything for this great nation. it stands for freedom, equality, and justice. and i'm damned proud of it. and that's my open. tell me what you think on my facebook page or twitter, #ju e #judgejeanine. and joining me now is the cohost of "the five," juanlliams. good evening, juan. nice to have you on the show tonight. how are you? >> i'm great. the weather's great. good evening, judge jude. your opening statement was strong. >> yes? all right. let's talk about brexit. i appreciate that.

so i won't let you hit me right off the bat, juan. what do you think is happening with brexit, juan? and the fact that, you know, the brits decided to exit the eu. what was that about? >> well, i think there are a number of things to say here. one is i think you have a lot of people reacting to the immigration issue, that we know is very high on their agenda. and secondly, the impact of the loss of so many jobs, especially in britain, you've had a terrific, you know, recession. they got hit much harder than we got hit here in the united states. they're unemployment is much higher. so i think you have those factors playing. but to pick up on what you say in your opening state, anybody in this country thinks, gee, we're so different, they might be whistling past the graveyard, judge jeanine, because you look at the polls over there, the polls were wrong. you look at the anti-establishment fervor over there, i see a lot of it over

here. and when you stop and think about, you know, even the history. remember, margaret thatcher won and bought conservatism to great britain and next year it was ronald reagan right here in the united states. but where i think you're off a bit is our electorate is much different over there. they don't have the diversity, the working class there is almost all white, while the working class here has lots of latinos and black people -- >> you know, juan, that's a great point. we are more diverse, but, you know, it was about london almost, you know, the urban, more cosmopolitan versus the other areas. but london and the brits have a big immigration issue, too. so they're not as homogenous as they once were. but isn't there a worldwide reaction to this immigration thing, this lunacy of, you know, no borders anymore. and i know you're not a trump fan, and you know i am a trump

fan. but, you know, he has hit a chord that i don't believe hillary clinton can ever hit. >> no, but remember, two things. one is, for britain and for the european union, they have endless borders and being controlled by the european union in brussels in terms of immigration flows and entry. here in the united states, we are blessed to have two large oceans and we have two neighbors, canada and mexico. that's about it. you talk about syrian refugees and fears that they're being infiltrated by terrorists. germany's taken in millions. we've taken in less than ten thousand. i don't even think 2,000 at this juncture. >> i don't think -- they're talking about 500% more. but juan, you admit that we're flying them in. we are flying them into states around the country and not giving those states notice pip mean, there is a war going on between some of the in congress who have no say with any of these refugee programs are bringing them in. we don't know who they are.

>> well, of course we know who they are. they have to go through a strict screening and let's take the syrian refugees, for example. it's two years, judge jeanine, before they can come anywhere near these shores. so we do know who's coming. but to your point, look at what happened down in orlando or san bernardino, those people were born in the united states. what we don't know, what we can't control is the kind of poisonous ideology -- >> i'm coming up against a break, juan. here's the thing, the head of the fbi says, if we've got no database to match them to, and if they're good and they say, i'm not a terrorist, we let 'em in. let's stop kidding each other. >> no. >> i mean -- >> it's not that simple. >> -- juan. >> if you screen people -- >> last word, quick. >> you go back, talk to neighbors -- >> where? in syria? you're going to say, hey, did they kill anybody lately? come on, juan! good to have you on the show, juan. thank you. >> my pleasure, judge. good to be with you. another bad week for hillary clinton, as we learned that the presumptive democratic

presidential nominee failed to hand over a key e-mail to the state department. ain't that shocking? with me now is american senate for law and justice chief council, my friend, jay seculo. hey, jay, how are you? >> hey, judge. how are you? good. >> everybody's fed up with the e-mail thing, but every week, there's something coming in that contradicts something else that she said. tell us about the significance of the particular e-mail that was the bad news for hillary this week. >> well, and this was because the narrative that secretary clinton has given since the beginning of this scandal, when it first erupted, was that she never received e-mails that were marked classified. they might have been marked classified after the fact, but she had no knowledge of that. it turns out that she had e-mails that were marked classified. so what has happened is, the narrative she started from the outset has been consistently proved to be incorrect. and again, you know, judge, you and i talked about this the other day. and the fact is, the inspector

general's report is the indictment. if there was going to be an indictment, it would be the inspector general's report, which really destroys the entire nairtive, including the narrative she relies on legal count from the state department. her lawyers said they didn't know anything about this until it was in the media. i think it's showing the depth of the inconsistencies, but the problem, of course, is will the fbi make the recommendation? >> and you know my thoughts on that. because she e-mailed the president on this unsecure server, classified information, the president is complicit. her first witness for the defense is barack obama. we would have a constitutional crisis. there's no way they're going to indict her for that. i think it's the foundation they can get her on. let me ask you about this. you know, she is so secret. if the fbi can show through its forensic analysis of the deleted e-mails, what was deleted? is the connection between her

doing favors for china and russia and uzbekistan and saudi arabia, while statement, they were given money, then an indictment should be forthcoming. >> well, this is the -- of course, this is the aspect you know as a judge and i know as a lawyer, a litigator. the fact is that the fbi goes where the evidence leads. and here in this particular situation, you've got the unusual situation where a secretary of state and at the same time, her husband and the family have the foundation, and the foundation, apparently has been receiving gifts from a variety of governments, many of which have horrible records on human rights issues. but, if, in fact, there was a quid pro quo, and the supreme court will decide a big quid pro quo case tomorrow, probably monday, that could be the really underbelly of this entire thing. >> but people don't care that she talks out of both sides of her mouth, that she's all in favor of women, while she's got the team that trashes all the women that her husband fooled around with and did worse. but what they do care about is

the pay for play. if they were making money -- >> that's exactly right. >> at the expense of americans and our interests. if russia has 20% of uranium, because bill clinton as a middle man was able to cut a deal with canada and uzbekistan, where a guy over there was actually indicted for the deal himself, you know, then i think shame on them if they don't do it. but what about democrats? i mean, you know, they've got to be smarter than this. she won't hand over her wall street speeches. now we find out she met with steve schwarzman, blackstone, and the ceo of all of these major companies and world banks and dropped all that information and left it all for calendar. >> and i think here's what you've got. you said this in your opening statement. the fact is, that whole approach that the dnc's utilizing right now was thoroughly rejected in the united kingdom, as they pulled out of the eu. that same sentiment's here. the question will be, politically, can donald trump

take that sentiment and turn it into votes a to the ballot box? but i think the vulnerability, clearly, on the issues, and you talked about immigration. and i'm the grandson of an immigrant. my grandmother came in through ellis island. >> we all are. >> exactly. but sentiment's there. i think there's vulnerability here. the question will be, will the american people take a look at the situation and say, you know what? this is our country, we're going to take it back. and i think that's the real question of the day, for the electorate. >> and the fact that as a result of the supreme court decision, obama can no longer ban the deportation of 4 million illegals and give them jobs, because he feels like it. it's going to be a different world. >> yeah. >> jay sekulow. thanks for being with us. >> thanks, judge. and one of donald trump's top economic advisers is here to talk with me about the brexit vote. and how the campaign can capitalize on it. my interview with him is next. and then, sheriff david clarke joins me live to talk about this week's freddie gray

verdict. i'm cooking on that one. something tells me he and i agree on whether the jury got it right. and later -- >> why is congress held in such low esteem? >> because they don't get anything done. >> you can say that again. i took the pull of the people to find out what americans think of the congressional sit-in. you won't

could britain's historic brexit vote lead to change in the united states come november? let's ask heritage foundation economist and donald trump economic adviser, steve moore. steve, what's your take on the last 72 hours on brexit? some people think it's just about the economy. is it? >> hi, judge. great to be with you. well, it's partly about the economy, no question about it. in england, in europe, and here in the united states, the middle class, the working class is in a kind of revolt right now. they're not feeling that we've ever really come out of this recession. their paychecks are shrinking. that's certainly happening here in the united states. and there is this kind of rebellion that's going on. we saw this in the rise of

donald trump, and i think that was part of the explanation for what happened in that -- remember, nobody expected that vote that we had. >> well, all the predictions were that it wasn't going to happen. >> exactly! >> you know what, steve, you know what i think is interesting. i started reading about this more. you know, i think like a lot of people, it's happening in britain, what's that got to do with us? but at the same time, what i find fascinate is that cameron had obama go over there and say, oh, you know, in his dictatorial, you know, you shouldn't leave. but what they started saying is that if they exited the eu, that it would harm the national security. that abu bakr al baghdadi, the leader of the islamic state, was probably in favor of britain leaving the eu. they were so desperate to not leave it. what was that about? >> well, it was over the top. the rhetoric was kplecompletelyr the top. by the way, it was over the top in europe. it was over the top in the uk and over the top here in the united states with the president

saying, you're going to go to the end of the line and it's going to be armageddon. >> right. >> and you know wlapd, i think, judge. people arrived -- not just in the united states, but people in britain and europe as well, they're tuning out these politicians. and they're tuning out the media, because they don't believe them anymore because they've been lied to so often. and this kind of over-the-top rhetoric. the more you have these elites and the snobbish politicians say you have to do this, i think it almost made the case against what they were trying to do. >> do you think other countries in europe are going to follow this? >> i do. >> which? >> that's a good question. >> greece? >> the question is what happens to germany. because germany's paying all the bills over there. so there's -- >> you know, angela merkel, she invited them in. let her pay the bill. >> but greece will never leave the eu, because they're the ones who are collecting all the money. so they want it. >> and germany. >> one of the things that upset the british citizens, they're net payers, they have to pay $10

billion to $20 billion a year from the british taxpayers go over to europe and people said, i'm sick of that. i think you're seeing the same thing here is in the united states. you know why donald trump say, why are we paying all the costs for nato? why isn't europe paying for their own defense. >> i never realized it, but apparently they're only paying 4% or something absurd. we're paying like 96% of that. that's bizarre. but this scaremongering and isn't it really about big business, big banks, the establishment, being able to continue to pull the strings on the working man? >> no question about it. yes, this was a workers' class revolt. and i love the did you see the headline in the "new york post" this morning? power to the people. >> i had it in my open, steve! >> it was fantastic. we're seeing the same dynamics

happen here. i saw it in the republican primaries. a lot of voters didn't belief what these professional politicians were saying. they'd been lied to and think washington is corrupt. i'll give you one amazing staskt. three of the five wealthiest counties in america are in washington, d.c. how did that happen, judge? we don't produce anything in washington. we produce lawyers and politicians and get all the money. >> steve moore, thanks for being with us tonight. >> see you soon. >> street justice takes on the congressional sit-in and that's ahead. but next, the historic vote in england and the new details on the clinton investigation. i'm talking about all of it and the impact on the race for president with my political panel as justice rolls

the fire. i'm jackie ibaibanez, now back "justice with judge jeanine." >> welcome back to "justice" on this very busy news night. trump, hillary, brexit, so much

to talk about. let's get to it with matt schlapp and former senior aide to democratic senator, charles schumer, chris heim. chris, where are you? >> i'm in west babylon, new york. >> matt, brexit, who does it benefit? trump or clinton? >> trump, absolutely. you know what, hillary clinton's campaign slogan is? stronger together. what was the slogan of those who wanted to stay in the eu? stronger together. there are so many themes that parallel what's happening in the uk and what's happening here, it's really interesting. >> well, yeah, it is interesting, chris, and i don't think you can deny that this is something that doesn't benefit hillary. you know what, the fact that she couldn't figure out a statement for a while tells me they were in the trenches saying, oh, my good pn goodness. but let's talk about what happened with the sit-in in congress this week. so they had this gun control sit-in. what was the point of that?

if they couldn't get enough people to get a signature, to get a petition signed for a vote, they couldn't get the amendments passed, they can't get in the house or the senate, what is this? play acting? >> i thought it was exciting politics for a couple of hours. i think america really woke up to see that there's no action happening in congress on a very serious issue. >> and who's fault is that? >> all politics is theater. >> but whose fault is it? is it the republican's fault? >> i think speaker ryan should let this come to a vote. if he really wants to see it happen, they should let it come to a vote. >> if they can't follow the system and the process to get a bill to the on the floor, it's their fault. it's a bipartisan failure. and you know what cracks me up? obama had the house and the senate in 2009 and the white house and today he's like, the republicans are stopping us from

doing this. what do you say, matt? >> i think -- security, then. >> what'd you say, chris? >> sorry, matt, i think he wasted an opportunity on government -- >> we know he wasted -- i thought you were going to defend him. go ahead, matt. >> guns, he didn't pass anything on immigration, shockingly enough. you know what this was, judge, this was a senatebuster. this was people sitting around doing nothing. >> they do nothing anyway. >> you know why they ended the senabuster? it was because they wanted to catch flights out of town and a lot wanted to go to a baseball game. >> i've got to tell you, i walked the street. wait until you see street justice. they hate them. what about the supreme court this week? supreme court decision, a 4-4 split keeps the decision in place. the president is trying to block the deportation of 4 million illegal immigrations and give them a license to work. and they said, no way jose.

>> well, you know, bad for the president today, good for hillary in november. if you're a latino voter in america right now, you know exactly who's on your side and who you should be voting for. and if donald trump doesn't get over 30% of latinos -- >> if they're legal, how are they going to vote? >> that's the thing, legal leents in this country feel very strongly about this, because they know how hard the process was. >> you're wrong. the legal latino who is came the right way, who got a lawyer and swore allegiance to this country, who know our history, who want to speak our language, they're angry that they had to pay those lawyers. >> judge, he's underwater in florida and it's because of the latino vote. he's doing very well with white males. >> go ahead, matt. >> chris, here's the deal. what happened in brexit had a lot to do with immigration. the fact is, is this. we talk about nationalism. i just like to talk about sovereignty. whatever happened to the idea that a country controls its borders and who enters this country? we are a nation of people who used to be immigrants, but we

get to control when the immigrant gets to become a legal resident and a citizen. guess what, chris? that's no racist, and americans are responding to that message. >> go ahead, chris. >> most americans, matt, including donald trump, didn't even know what brexit was two weeks ago. >> they know now. they know now, chris. >> the latino voters and educated whites in america are not going to stand for that kind of isolationism that they had there in britain. in fact most british people today are regretting what happened today. >> really? did you do your own poll, chris? stop with the hogwash. most brits are regretting the decision they made 48 hours ago? are you kidding -- >> no, judge, the polls actually sew that more brits are actually regretting the fact that they didn't also vote to pull out of the eu, then the opposite. so that's completely untrue. and the fact is is this -- >> well,, you know -- >> there's going to be some political turbulence after this pullout. there's no question. everyone's going to use it for their political advantage. the fact is people get the truth

here. countries should be able to control their borders and control their economies. and that's the theme of the day. >> what's wrong with being an american? what's wrong with being proud of this nation? why are people flying the flags from other countries and burning the american flag? i get the first amendment, but you know what? they went too far >> first of all, most people don't burn the american flag. >> but people carrying flags from over countries are. >> judge, i think most people, immigrants, non-immigrants, even people coming here illegally want to be part of the american dream. >> well, if they want to be part of the american dream, follow the american law, chris. >> if the american law was fixed the way it was supposed to be -- >> fixed! the law's in place. your family, my family, matt's family followed the law. >> judge, judge, the fact is this. not only do we have people here who shouldn't be here, they're here illegally, you know what the court just showed, the supreme court, the president of

the united states is acting in an illegal fashion when he tries to give these people -- >> and this sanctuary city, we don't deport them and they're killing people, shame on us! matt schlapp and chris heim, bye. street justice is next and next,

big developments this week in the freddie gray case. officer cesar goodson, the driver of the fan that transported gray after his arrest, was found not guilty of all charges. that makes him the third officer in that case tried without a conviction. meanwhile, there are growing calls for prosecutor marilyn

mosby to step down and drop the charges against the other officers in this case. here with reaction, milwaukee county sheriff, david clark. good evening, sheriff. all right, the freddie gray case and what happened in baltimore is pretty much a symbol of the black community's distrust of law enforcement. and yet here we had a black prosecutor. a black defendant, a black defendant and a black judge. is this a racist verdict? >> not even hardly. judge, look, this woman, marilyn mosby, is drowning in her own incompetency. justice has prevailed for one of baltimore's finest once again. you're a former prosecutor, a district attorney. you never would have charged this case. you were a judge, you sat and heard these types of cases. you would have dismissed this, too. keep in mind that marilyn mosby, before she became the state's attorney in that county in baltimore, has never charged or

prosecuted a homicide case. she does not know anything that goes on -- >> the woman was an insurance lawyer! did you know that? she was an insurance lawyer. >> yes. >> and within 24 hours of getting of the autopsy report, she says, it's a homicide, we're going to indict. and then she says, i hear your call, as if she's the queen who's going to come out and calm the masses. what's going on in this woman's head? >> well, she weaponized the prosecutor's office there, looking for a political end. she went on a witch hunt, looking to hang one of baltimore's finest for something that they did not do. i've investigated a lot of homicides myself. i've taken them in for charging. if you were the prosecutor on this, with i would have said, madame district attorney, we don't have anything here other than a horrible tragedy. there's no criminal intent on anybody's part, and you would have done the right thing. i think right now, marilyn mosby is going to have to dig down and find the moral courage to do the right thing. if she continues to put up this

facade and good people in the city of baltimore have to relive and have this wound opened and relive this horrible tragedy over and over and over again because of her she promised som cannot deliver. it's time to let the city o baltimore put this ugly chapter behind them and let them move forward. i'm asking the attorney general of the state of maryland to move in, take this case over, go into a court and ask that these charges be dismissed and end this horrible nightmare. >> you know what's interesting, chief, is -- sheriff, i should say, is the fact that when they were put to the test, of proving the evidence of this depraved heart murder, they couldn't even prove anything with how many minutes of video they had, the defendant who was in the van, another prisoner, said, nah, everything was fine. and, yub, the guy -- there were two minimal infractions, one

that involved a wider turn than it should have been, which would have been, according to, you know, the defense, the g-force would have benefited the victim in the case. i mean, does the woman not know how to prove a case? >> no, she doesn't, because she should have never charged this case. look, she made this decision, even before the investigation was completed by the baltimore police department. now she doesn't know what to do. she may become the first prosecutor in u.s. history to have a six-defendant case and go 0 for 6. >> well, those are pretty bad numbers, but let me ask you this. as a d.a., i ran my office and i had a lot of investigators and cops who worked for me. the most important thing that we can do as prosecutors is to work closely with cops. how do you think it's working in that d.a.'s office, for the victim of rape, the victim of larceny, a burglary? i mean, when the cops go in to the d.a.'s office, i mean,

what's it like? this woman is looking to hang these people with no evidence. how does this impact the community. >> oh, she's damaged. she has no integrity. this relationship is ruined between her, the community, and the law enforcement officers, baltimore's finest. that's why i think that she should give up her law license after she pulls out of this, and if not, i think the maryland bar association ought to conduct an investigation and suspend her license. a first-year law student, a first-year person who's in law school would know, judge, you know this, that they don't have anything to suggest any criminality of the standard needed, especially for a homicide. i've worked homicides. i've brought them in for review. it's a very high standard and most time prosecutors don't take chances with these types of cases. >> no, we don't. sheriff david clark, thank you so much for being with us. and lawmakers take a seat in a and lawmakers take a seat in a sit-in on capitol hill,

hey guys lunch is here! it's on me fellas. with the chase mobile app, stephen curry can send money to more people in less time. thanks, steph! no problem. even to friends in a growing number of other banks.

ya'll ready to go? come on fellas let's go! easy to use chase technology for whatever you're trying to master.

thank you. ordering chinese food is a very predictable experience. i order b14. i get b14. no surprises. buying business internet, on the other hand, can be a roller coaster white knuckle thrill ride. you're promised one speed. but do you consistently get it? you do with comcast business. it's reliable. just like kung pao fish. thank you, ping. reliably fast internet starts at $59.95 a month. comcast business. built for business. this week in washington, house democrats staged a sit-in over gun control legislation. a sit-in. they stopped working, because they were mad that they couldn't get their way. so, i hit the streets for some street justice to get your take

on the congressional chaos. take a look. okay, what do you think of the congressional sit-in, when everybody sat on the floor in congress because they couldn't get their way? >> it's a start. >> it's a start? no, it's a stop. it's not a start. >> all right, it's a stop. i mean, get something done already. >> you have all these congress people bringing in their sleeping bags because they can't get a bill passed and they're kicking and screaming. is it any wonder they're held in such lowest teem? >> that's what they're doing, anyways. >> what are they doing? >> they're sleeping. they brought their sleeping bags, they're ready to camp out. >> now they're admitting it. >> listen, i just like to see our government get together and be effective. i'm getting tired of watching -- >> yeah, but we're all tired. they are held in such lowest teem. 18% approval rating, okay? >> deserve it. >> it's a play, the take on guns. don't believe it. i'm telling you, it's just not right. they're acting like children. but if the republicans did that,

oh, my lord. >> what do you think of all these congress people in the sit-in in congress, because they couldn't get a bill passed? they brought their sleeping bags? >> well, i think sometimes drastic action is necessary to get things done. >> why sit-in in congress? go outside and sit-in and let congress do the people's work. >> well, i think they're sitting in because they want to create action. and that's the place to be, i mean, doing it outside is not going to have as great of an effect. look at the attention you're giving it. >> the amazing thing is they couldn't get a bill passed in the house, the senate, they couldn't get enough for the amendment, and so, they're stopping the people's business in congress. that's just wrong, isn't it? >> totally wrong. absolutely. it's childish. >> why is congress held in such lowest teem? >> because they don't get anything done. >> what should we do? >> ah -- >> what's your opinion? >> you're very kind. 18% approval, kick them all out. kick them all out and get a leader. >> do you think we need a

leader? >> well, we have a leader. i think president obama's a great guy. his inability to get things done is a question. i don't know -- >> inability, the guy ignores the constitution and decides he's going to pass executive -- do some executive action and let everybody -- >> well, i'm a republican. i'm a businessman and i'm a republican. >> what's wrong with you? >> two laws proposed by republicans, two laws proposed by the democrats. if each person rejects the other side's proposals, that's when nothing is getting done. >> so, you say it and the drafting -- >> the drafting process. you have to have something that both parties can get on board with. it might not be what they want. but not everything they do want. that's how we're going to get something done. you have to let them go. they're going to do what they're going to do anyway. and the more attention we pay to them, the more they're going to do it. >> yeah. you're right. would you say they're losers? >> i would never call anyone a loser, but i would say, hey, to each their own. >> they're sleeping in sleeping bags?

>> yeah, in congress, in washington. does that surprise you? >> they probably weren't doing nothing in the first place anyway, so, i mean -- it's good to get rest, you know, you ain't working, you might as well go and get some rest. >> we'll be right back.

that's it for us tonight. remember to friend me on facebook and follow me on twitter. and on instagram at judge

underscore jeanine. thanks for watching. "the greg gutfeld" show is next. see you next too. >> thank you. o. lauren is next with the fox report. >> brexit fears rattling the marketses and a new pene pone reality sinks in, donald trump said the news will not be bad for the u.s. this is the fox report. an entire continent on edge as fears rise that other nations may follow britain's lead and decide to leave the european union behin. it makes up the second largest economy. and a full fledged break up could impact trade. donald trump said the u.s. should not be concern