tv The Five FOX News July 5, 2016 2:00pm-3:01pm PDT
2:00 pm
tonight at 6:00 pm eastern time. murray cole, one of the last standing cole companies finally falls victim to president obama and his policies. don't miss it. he is very passionate. very serious about the damage done to his company. hi, i'm kimberly along with eric bolling. it's 5:00 in new york city and this is "the five." the fbi's long-awaited decision on hillary clinton is finally in. the agency has cleared the presumptive democratic nominee of criminal wrongdoing by using a private e-mail server as secretary of state. and it recommends the justice department do the same. >> although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a
2:01 pm
case. >> indeed. director james comy doesn't think clinton should be charged but did admonish her of being extremely careless. >> although we did not find evidence that secretary clinton and her colleagues willfully -- none of these e-mails should be on any kind of class unclassified system. >> did they feel any pressure to clear clinton of wrongdoing? come dy says no. >> i can assure the american people this investigation was done honest ly, competently and independently. no outside influence of any kind was brought to bear. >> owe the fbi essentially determining clinton broke the law but she didn't mean to. now you can imagine the clinton camp is over the moon. so is juan. putting out this statement, we
2:02 pm
are pleased the career officials handling this case have determined that no further action by the department is appropriate. as the secretary has long said, it was a mistake to use her personal e-mail and healed not do it again. we are glad that this matter is now resolved. >> sure, i'm glad that -- i never thought she was going to be indicted if that was your point. >> yeah. you were saying from the beginning you didn't feel that the evidence rose to this level. >> no. if you look at the previous cases, you know, david petraeus or other cases where there was -- greg gutfeld said you don't necessarily need intent, you said to me. the fact that you did or behaved in such a way. i said i think you do need some degree of intent. what you heard from fbi director comey today was there was no bad quantity of information, no willful mishandling of information. certainly no disloyalty to the united states. and after the fact, no
2:03 pm
obstruction of justice by clinton. what we have is carelessness but not crime. >> can i -- you bring up the point of intent. actually, you don't need intent. >> correct. >> because, you know, nobody who plows into a liquor store wanted to do that. you know? the intent doesn't mean anything. if you allow for intent, then that's the excuse. you could just keep yourself out of the loop and have everybody else do your dirty work and always claim that you don't know. the interesting thing is watching comey, sweating like a drug mule at customs. he did not like what he was having to say. he was upset. he knows that he set a precedent. you can't prosecute the little guy if you don't prosecute the big guy. >> so he spent the first ten minutes outlining what they did and what they found.
2:04 pm
and it was long. it was elaborate. she was extremely careless or they were extremely careless. i'm quoting. they should have known -- these are all things that he spent time saying. i'm going, wow! i agree with juan. i never thought she was going to be indicted from the very beginning. >> but for different reasons. >> the first ten minutes of this thing, i thought maybe they found something and maybe they're going to recommend an indictment. this will be interesting. then he comes with the very shortest part. we're going to do three things what we did, what we found and what we recommend. the recommendation was very short and concise. no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case and some stupid foreign looking thing, but don't try it at home because you will be. are the clintons above the law? if you ever thought so now you can absolutely degree with that. the fix was in. this is terrible. the timing. the timeline on this was insane. bill meets loretta lynch on the tarmac eight days ago. over the weekend the fbi spent three hours with hillary clinton.
2:05 pm
over the weekend president obama conveniently decides he's going to start his campaigning with hillary clinton in north carolina. >> charlotte. >> on tuesday right after the holiday weekend. and what happens? the recommendation of no indictment comes down. an hour later they're in charlotte, north carolina. can you imagine if comey said yes, the most powerful man on the planet standing next to someone who should be indilated. they all knew and if obama knows that's a big problem. >> you had comments on this earlier today. >> he went through and listed all the items as he started the press conference. they were actually so much worse than what anyone had reported. that's what was amazing to me. we're not talking about "a" server, we're talking about many servers destroyed along the way, many different administrators. not just one. he is like one of a dozen. there are all these people all over the place. and then he went piece by piece and showed you everywhere that she lied. used only one device for
2:06 pm
convenience. nope, actually, lots of devices, lots of servers. she never sent or received anything marked or classified. yes, absolutely she did. here are the ones that were marked at the time that she both sent and received. he said the stuff that's marked up classified is totally different. we left that out. sthee had said that. that's a lie. and then he said any reasonable person should have known. then he concluded i understand intent is not necessary under the law. he said it's not necessary but it's easier to make the case if it's clear. so in the future we're going to look for e-mails laying next to people that say my intent here was to murder bob. >> that's the problem. >> because shooting them with a gun didn't show that. >> the one everybody cites is david petraeus. i hear it all the time. how can you treat petraeus this way? he pled guilty to a misdemeanor. and not charge hillary clinton with anything.
tv-commercial
tv-commercial
2:07 pm
petraeus had to remove and retain classified information and then hand it over to his lover. hillary clinton never engaged in any such behavior. >> do we know that? >> what do you mean? >> didn't we just find out she had burn bags? >> hillary, yeah. >> no. >> her schedule. >> 30,000 e-mails that the fbi said that they didn't get. they couldn't have. she sent to her lawyers. they all agreed they weren't relevant to the case and they burned them. >> they deleted them and then -- >> unrecoverable. >> cleaned their devices in a way that they would not be recoverable. >> the lawyers did. >> the standard here seems to be clear and convincing evidence. forget gross negligence. clinton has been defiant that she has not sent or received classified information. remember that? comey said actually that wasn't true. >> from the group of 30,000 e-mails returned to the state department 110 e-mails in 52 e-mail chains have been determined by the owning agency
2:08 pm
to contain classified information at the time they were sent or received. eight of those chains contain information that was top secret at the time they were sent. 36 of those chains contained secret information at the time. and eight contained confidential information at the time. that's the lowest level of classification. separate from those 32 e-mails were up scaled to make them confidential. they were not classified at the time they were sent or received. >> all right, greg? >> when you hear clinton and chains, last thing you think of, for me, is hillary. you have an obligation to protect your information. your information is basically -- private stuff that if it gets into the wrong hands -- and as you find out, she has been traveling in areas where you, you know, people could hack her
2:09 pm
material. this is extreme carelessness, which sounds like a movie. >> same as gross negligence. you said it right there. >> the one question anybody can ask her during the debate is would you be okay if people on your staff had a private server too? that's the issue. they can't prosecute after -- if they can't do anything about her, they can't do anything about anybody in the future. >> she said that she admits that she regrets having done this and would not do it again. i think the standard is clear. i don't think it opens the door to anyone saying what about hillary clinton? >> whynot? >> it's a different standard. >> because if you went after her, let me just say, you would have to go after condi rice, colin powell. >> they didn't maintain their own personal server in contradiction with policy. that is the problem. >> it was the policy. >> and all the people she was sending and receiving e-mails
2:10 pm
knew that was not on the proper server. >> if the nib says -- juan williams, anyone at the table says we want all the information surrounding this. we want your work phone and private phone and you decide to turn over your private phone and you keep your work phone like this, that's essentially what she did. >> no. >> wait a minute. hold on. let me finish. >> all right. >> 30,000 e-mails that comey says they combed through and took the other side are the ones she turned over. there are still 30,000 pages of e-mails that she turned over. >> bolling is right. rudy giuliani said the same thing you're saying. destruction of evidence. and you would be entitled to an instruction from front of the jury, that they knew what they were doing at the time. >> fbi said when they change different devices and servers, some of it gets deleted and lost.
2:11 pm
it's not that there was an intent to obstruct justice. >> that's why you're not allowed -- by the way, that's why you're not allowed to have your own personal server. >> the way eric presented it, if i was on the jury i would say guilty. send her to the gallows. >> why does james comey get to decide if she's guilty or not? >> he's investigating and now refers to the justice department. >> he can make a recommendation. he went out of his way to say any reasonable prosecutor -- no reasonable prosecutor would put this case forward. that's far greater than making a recommendation. he's saying i'm finder of fact. you cannot bring this case forward. >> he didn't say that. >> that's what it says nochlt reasonable prosecutor. >> loretta lynch -- >> unreasonable. by the way, loretta lynch is going to stay in that position. >> i was trying to respond to your earlier point. loretta lynch at the justice department makes the call. >> i'm aware of that. >> then he ran from the room as
2:12 pm
fast as he possibly could, didn't take any questions. >> how much politics around this, melissa? >> made his answer and bolted. >> another thing that he brought up. there was something about security sanctions. a possibility that you have a president that doesn't have clearance. is that possible? that's like a doctor who can't prescribe drugs this is something that -- this is a huge deal. also that everybody knew about the server. an open secret to everybody. do you know what they should have done? they should have just said, look, it's easy to ruin your lives. young kids and old people have problems with technology. maybe your password was her birthday and the name of her grandchild. everybody understands that. say look, this is new to me. that would have been funny. >> the open secret, you made a joke and it's funny. do you know why it's not funny?
2:13 pm
both of those occurrences, her e-mails and his females that everybody knew about, foreign governments, people that would want to hold it against them could use those things against the united states. >> it compromises their posit n position. rudy giuliani said today -- comey used to work for him -- said she would never pass background security clearance to work for the government at this point. it's that egregious. she wants to be commander in chief and negotiate with heads of state and fix the isis problem but she'll just be commander in chief in name only right because she's basically broken all the rule there is and wouldn't pass. >> i thought you might say time to move on. benghazi. conspiracy continues. >> it reminds us of the 1990s. i keep waiting for "friends" to come back. it's like "friends" coming back but better than ever because she's just as corrupt as she was in the '90s. >> just covered her bases and met her at her house, no defense
2:14 pm
attorneyworthy her salt would let her sit down with the fbi if they thought she was going to get indict or subject to prosecution. then she went to "hamilton" and did selfies on broadway right after that happened. ahead one of the major concerns about the private server was it was open to being hacked. was it? that's next.
2:16 pm
it takes a lot of work... to run this business. but i really love it. i'm on the move all day long... and sometimes, i just don't eat the way i should. so i drink boost® to get the nutrition that i'm missing. boost complete nutritional drink has 26 essential vitamins and minerals, including calcium and vitamin d to support strong bones and 10 grams of protein to help maintain muscle. all with a great taste. i don't plan on slowing down any time soon. stay strong. stay active with boost®.
2:18 pm
we're back on "the five." fbi's huge announcement today, the agency is not recommending that hillary clinton be criminally charged even though she sent and received classified material on her private e-mail server while secretary of state and even though they believe her nonsecured server may have been hacked. listen to this. >> we did not find direct evidence that seblingt clinton's personal e-mail domain in its various was hacked since 2009. private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom secretary clinton was in regular contact with her personal account. we also assessed that secretary
2:19 pm
clinton's personal e-mail domain was readily apparent, known by a large number of people. given that combination of factors we assess that it is possible that hostile actors gained access to secretary clintn's e-mail account. >> let me summarize. likely she was not hacked but everyone she e-mailed to was likely hacked and could have been to. >> yes, the arsonist burned down the house but it's kind of like a campfire. it's not really that bad. you will see it was a lousy system to use and they didn't know it was unsafe. and that's essentially no different than blaming a video. they're blaming the technology and not the person. they should blame it on the movie "you got mail." that would be better. >> remember that? >> yeah. >> what do you take from that? so many negligence going on here. hanging around the wrong people, sending e-mails, talking to the wrong people. that may come back to you
tv-commercial
2:20 pm
houchlt does the fbi say that's not her fault, though? >> that's the problem. every single thing he was laying out, wow, this is even worse. multiple servers. oh, and definitely people were able to get into this or get access. oh, and her attorneys deleted -- not only did they delete the information, we have no way to get that. they also then cleaned their dwoiss so it was not even possible for to us review it. what does that sound like? the fix is in. and the last second they interview her. when you hear about this, this is somebody that wants to be in charge of our national security, of our foreign policy and acts in total conscious disregard to the safety of our country so we can be compromised by other countries, gaining access to information like russia and like china. honestly, with people running, nominees, like this, who needs enemies? >> she should have known better.
2:21 pm
listen. >> seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified as top secret special access program at the time they were sent and received. those chains involved secretary clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails about those same matters. there is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in secretary clinton's position or in the position of those with whom she was corresponding about those matters should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation. >> so, juan, she wants to be commander in chief. she should have known better. >> she should have known better. i don't think anybody is disputing that. i was amazed how quickly you raised about the headline. no finding that her e-mail system was hacked. none. zero. >> that's not what he said. >> that's exactly -- >> no, no, no. >> let me just finish my point. >> okay. >> then he says there were other people with whom she was in communication with, their systems were -- and, therefore,
2:22 pm
people may have seen e-mails that she communicated with those folk. >> no, that's not what he said. >> go ahead. >> an e-mail chain where they're talking back and forth with all these people about top secret information that's not supposed to be out there and she is sending and receiving to gmail and all kinds of crazy accounts information that is top secret. he said any reasonable person would have known not to have this conversation like this. >> correct. >> so his conclusion, she's not a reasonable person. end point. she is not a reasonable person. >> no, no, she should have been more -- i don't think anybody is disputing that. her system had not been hacked. even if it had been hacked. >> that's not -- no, no. >> to the point of being reckless even. >> wait. >> but she did not commit a criminal act and her system was not hacked. >> sophisticated hackers get in, they don't leave evidence. that's what he said. >> he said they will never know. that's the scary part. they will never know. there really are -- >> we'll find out. >> bill and hillary are the political version of bonnie and
2:23 pm
clyde. she's about to get indicted. he shows up on the tarmac. 30 minutes off screen you don't really know what happened. must have been a great story about the grandkids, golf course. they're off to mexico with the hope diamond, next thing you know. seriously. it doesn't even look bad, smell bad. it is bad. >> ywe have to go. it is scary that comey said it wasn't even as secure as gmail. >> that was terrible. i was screaming inside. more porous than gmail? this is my independent investigation after five seconds talking to her saturday night? how could that be considered so thorough? >> after listening to my friends at the table, i concluded this. if you didn't like hillary clinton before, you are with wishing that her campaign would be undercut by the fbi. you still think she's guilty. for most democrats who didn't really care about this anyway and for independent voters who will decide the election --
2:24 pm
>> no, next segment, juan, you will find out why you are wrong. >> great for donald trump. he gets to run across crooked hillary instead of biden. house speaker paul ryan goes on the "kelley file" tonight. catch that exclusive at 9:00 pm eastern. greg is on the gift he thinks the fbi gave to the republican party today.
2:28 pm
2:29 pm
stains than on a baby's behind. there's not enough to prosecute her but more than enough to scare the hell out of you and put a country in jeopardy. we're not arresting you, hillary, just calling you a big jerk who should be arrested. comey just delivered a place of juicy sound bites to the republicans. and that puts the dems in a bind. had he suggested charges be brought, they could have dumped hillary and defrosted biden, more likable candidate, one without a cloud above him, just hair that looks like one. they won't bring charges. instead they did something worse, portrayed her as incompetent, careless and unsafe in an increasingly unsafe world. her ineptitude on steroids. comey just handed the republicans their angle, the secretary of state who put the
2:30 pm
state at risk without even trying. if it's not a commercial by tomorrow i'll eat my hat as long as it's made of bacon. juan, because you actual ly ly. independence and especially independent women who are going to have a decisive vote in this race will say fbi has delivered their verdict. the verdict is hillary is not to be indicted. let's move on. >> eric, i was on twitter, which i often am. a lot of leftists, liberals angry about this. people like glenn greenwalt. >> more effective for the democrats would be recommendation for an indictment. maybe even indictment and then her getting exonerated by a jury. they would go, wow!
2:31 pm
a jury of her peers lets her go. very quickly, can i say something? president obama right now -- we all know that the obamas and clintons don't like each other. they're doing it right on the democrat side. got behind their candidate. on the right the republican party can't stand trump and won't get behind him. you have to get behind him now. >> are you saying jim comey is rigged and corrupt? >> president obama had to know she was not going to be recommended for prosecution for him to plan this trip. >> major scheduling and security issues. that's why there has to be planning and logistics. >> but nobody -- according to comey, nobody knew that he was -- what he was going to say.
2:32 pm
>> she didn't know? she had no idea? >> that's what jim comey said. by the way, jim comey is a republican. i happen to think he is a man of impeccable integrity. >> i'm disagreeing with that part. >> relitigating it is not going to work. if you look at responses on twitter, it is this idea that there are two sets of rules out there. one set of rules where the people in washington who govern us and another set of rules for all the rest of us who pay their bills. and that's the thing that has people so upset this election season. that's why this works against her. for republicans, i think you never say the word e-mail again. you're right. people are sick of it. instead you say look, he proved she's a liar. she may not be a criminal but here are the four places she lied. liar, liar, liar. that's it. >> pants on fire. >> suit on fire. >> the whole thing. she really has to win now. do you know why? >> why? >> loretta will stay as her ag.
2:33 pm
statute of limitations doesn't run on this. donald trump becomes president of the united states, an ag goes forward, other countries being able to breach it, et cetera, et cetera, if she's not in a position of power, people will come forward and tell the truth. then there's an issue there. think about that. rudy giuliani. >> loretta will be her vp after this. >> please, she'll be the next supreme court justice. >> it doesn't hurt loretta lynch. >> the optics for her or comey, widely respected. >> hillary is never using e-mail again. she will only use the oral legend. katherine harris, getting some inside information on the fbi's investigation. stay tuned.
2:38 pm
hillary clinton, fbi not recommending that the justice department indict clinton. >> looking back at our investigation into the mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. this is not that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequence. to the contrary. >> let's bring in our chief intelligence correspondent, katherine harris now. for more, what do you hear from
2:39 pm
inside the fbi? all along i had thought even after president clinton getting on the plane with loretta lynch, the attorney general, if director comey, an fbi agent, issued a recommendation to indict that was ignored, the outcry from inside the fbi would be deafening and pletcally explosive. what are you hearing today? >> i've heard from a handful of law enforcement, some still within the bureau and some recently retired. so it's not a scientific survey, if you will. they genuinely are very disappointed with what they heard from that statement from the fbi director today. they thought it was uncharacteristic of the director and their assessment was that there was sufficient evidence to proceed. but it was not necessarily a slam dunk, 150% that. to bring prosecution and to not
2:40 pm
succeed would effectively take a presidential nominee out of the electoral process and that would be interfering with the election in this country, juan. >> wow! >> katherine, we heard all along there are two tracks that the fbi was pursuing. this is what people have been asking online. this is the track about the e-mail and security there, but also the public corruption and pay for play. why she may have been doing this, covering up with what was going on with the found ais. have we heard anything about that part of the investigation? >> i have not been able to get anything further on the investigation into sort of the public corruption track in the clinton foundation. what i would say is that there is absolute mention of that at the news conference today. and the director's statements seemed pretty final. i don't want to give people bad information. there was simply nothing that spoke to that issue. >> inspectors are still on the
2:41 pm
case. >> hi, katherine. as a former prosecutor, i sit here and think it looks like and sounds like they changed the standard of proof because what it sounded like today -- and he kept mentioning about specific intent and we don't feel that they intended, et cetera. but that's not the standard within the particular statute. it's gross negligence and he made mention over and over again to the extreme carelessness that was happening during this whole time and not just one innocent time but over and over again and across multiple servers. >> you're best to address the legal questions. i've had a copy of the 793 which is the gross negligence statute. i would encourage people to go online and read the language. there's absolutely no requirement for intent. what i found striking today is that he seemed to lay out the prerequisite requirements for 793 in the first 13 or 14 minutes of his statement and
2:42 pm
then he kind of said, that's all, folks. there was going to be nothing further. the other thing that jumps out at me is if you take his statements in their totality, he did severely undercut some of the main planks of mrs. clinton's public statements about her use of this personal unsecured server, simply the fact that she did send and receive classified information and she should have known it to be. so some of the e-mails did contain classified markings. nothing she sent or received, she said, was marked at the time. he also said based on their investigation, they're operating on the assumption that there was a third party compromise either by a hacker or by a foreign intelligence service. >> all right. now to eric bolling. >> she will tell you there was a standard, that you couldn't just be negligent and do something like this. now maybe the standard has changed forever for public officials. here is the question, very quickly. are we to understand -- they
2:43 pm
want us to believe that the first time loretta lynch heard that there was going to be a recommendation not to indict was today when the rest of the public heard about it from james comey? >> the fbi director said very publicly that he had not consulted with anyone before he made his statement today and just the little threads i picked up today is people genuinely within those departments are not aware of what he was going to say on his 15-minute statement to the nation about the investigation. i think we're going to learn more about what happened exactly, and the timing. because there really is already a concerted effort on capitol hill by the oversight committee plus senate judiciary to have these documents and evidence released to the public so they can really judge how strong the evidence was or wasn't in this case and whether the decision not to recommend prosecution was really warranted. >> hand of history rests with --
2:44 pm
>> it would be really cool to open a store called negligent and it's negliges for men. >> did you have to say that on camera? >> i'm going to ask -- i would like to make katherine smile. it makes me happy. >> question. i have a question for you. comey mentioned something about sanctions on clearances. is it possible that hillary could be sanctioned and, actually, not be able to be debriefed on the topic while running for president? >> this is such an interesting question. once one becomes the president-elect, you do start receiving the same security briefings that the president is currently receiving. so you're up-to-date and can make that transition quickly. i don't know the answer to that. he certainly left the door open to some kind of sanction. and then he also said that individuals in a similar case but in different circumstances
2:45 pm
might face prosecution for similar actions. it's a very interesting point to make and one i'm sure we're going to hear again in the next few week. >> katherine, you told greg it was an interesting, pertinent question. we're going to get punished for this. i'll tell you that. >> he caught me off guard with that negligence store or whatever. >> don't go back there. don't do that. >> just go on special report. >> will the justice department accept the fbi's recommendation not to charge hillary clinton? final thoughts straight ahead. stay with us. ♪ americans are buying more and more of everything online. and so many businesses rely on the united states postal service to get it there. because when you ship with us, your business becomes our business. that's why we make more ecommerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country.
2:46 pm
the united states postal service. priority: you ♪ sara, i love you, and... [phone rings] ah, it's my brother. keep going... sara, will you marry... [phone rings again] what do you want, todd???? [crowd cheering] keep it going!!!! if you sit on your phone, you butt-dial people. it's what you do. todd! if you want to save fifteen percent or more on car insurance, you switch to geico. it's what you do. i know we just met like, two months ago... yes! [crowd cheering] [crowd cheering over phone] spending the day with my niece. that make me smile. i don't use super poligrip for hold, because my dentures fit well. before those little pieces would get in between my dentures and my gum and it was uncomfortable. even well fitting dentures let in food particles. just a few dabs of super poligrip free is clinically proven to seal out more food particles so you're more comfortable and confident while you eat.
2:47 pm
2:49 pm
some final thoughts now on the breaking news today in case you're just waking up for the first time, because you had a big fourth of july, the fbi cleared clinton of criminal wrongdoing with her use of a private e-mail serve efr as secretary of state. final thoughts, kimberly? >> i found this to be astonishing as a dedicated former prosecutor to hear him lay the case and make the case so well for 14 minutes and then the last thing it's like somebody copied and pasted the wrong final conclusion when he said therefore no reasonable prosecutor could bring this forward.
2:50 pm
i think he made the case. he knows what the law is. he's a smart man. i think what loretta lynch did really compromised him. the weight of that, the burden of it fell on comey today saying she shouldn't bring forward a prosecution, so it takes it off her shoulders, absolving her. >> i say pay up. you were all wrong. screaming at the umpire, how could the ump make that call? they go to the replay, somebody totally impartial and the guy om comes back and says, yep, she's safe and you still don't like it. >> the game is rigged. >> that's what trump says. >> banana republic now. >> the ump is having drinks with the other team in the dugout. >> my goodness, take your ball and go home. let's not talk politics anymore. i'll do this show. >> what did you bet, by the way? >> it doesn't matter. we could go back to 2008, 2012. nobody at this network ever pays me on these bets. >> wait, we didn't even have
2:51 pm
a -- >> no one in the right mind would bet she's going to be indicted at this table. >> why would we be surprised? she should have worn an orange pantsuit today just to thumb her nose at the rest of the folks who would be indicted if we did what she did. >> a missed opportunity to martyr her. that would have been way better for her. reminded me of the supreme court ruling with john roberts, who laid out a perfect case against obamacare and then flipped it over and tricked everybody. that scamp. only thing she can rely on is somebody named trump who changed the news cycle with something big, which he happens to do and then she happens to do. news cycle these days, this might last three more minutes. >> that's what i was saying. i don't think we're going to remember this in five months. >> that's going to help her. this didn't help her. she should have been martyred. that would have helped her.
2:52 pm
>> she better hope that trump doesn't win and christie's not the ag or trouble cometh. >> juan williams made a very good point earlier today. >> wow! >> yes. that as a result of this, the haters are going to hate so much more on each side. the people who think she was frame rd more fired up. the trump people are super fired up. they think the whole thing is rigged. it's not about the people in the middle. the middle people -- i don't think the middle people exist anymore. if you go out in public, there's so much animosity between the two sides of this election, it's just about who is more fired up and is going to show up in greater numbers. that's what i think anyway. >> there you go, melissa. >> "one more thing" is next.
2:53 pm
with my moderate to severe crohn's disease,... ...i was always searching for ways to manage my symptoms. i thought i had it covered. then i realized managing was all i was doing. when i finally told my doctor, he said humira was for people like me who have tried other medications,... but still experience the symptoms of moderate to severe crohn's disease. in clinical studies, the majority of patients on humira saw significant symptom relief... ...and many achieved remission. humira can lower your ability to fight infections... ...including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers,... including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions,... ...and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb,... ...hepatitis b, are prone to infections,
2:54 pm
2:55 pm
2:56 pm
it's really different. see? it's flexible... ...and it has a chewy, porous texture, full of little tiny air pockets that gives dogs' teeth a clean scrub all the way down to the gum line. (vo) purina dentalife. for life. it's time now for one more thing. mr. bolling? >> great weekend. the book tour, in new jersey. then went down south. take a look at the first picture at the village. >> my goodness. >> we sent book forwards and sold out every single copy of the book. people are so engaged. next picture, very similar. >> wow! >> happened to be in central florida. there it is "the five." this one is so special for me. spent two days with eric before he goes off to college. they're coming up to him, wanted to talk with him. so engaging. it was fantastic. this last one, vero beach book
2:57 pm
center. >> wow sthrks. >> phenomenal crowd. sold that one out as well. people are ready to have their voice told. guess what, loving the way they're doing it. >> congratulations. very exciting. excited to have you on tomorrow at 2:00 pm in for gretchen. i have a really nice "one more thing" today. patriotic and involves animals today. this is interesting. it happened in minnesota. the day before the fourth of july. there's a little bald eagle. can you show? there we go. piece of rope wrapped around a tree about 70 feet high. nobody could do anything because of the height. jason galvin, u.s. army vet who did two tours in afghanistan noticed it and he did something. see him right there? .22 caliber rifle with a scope used his marksman skills to shoot the rope and branches. bald eagle was able to fall down. it will make a full recovery. he named it freedom. also tonight, former bush
2:58 pm
a.g. will join me at 7:00. i'm in for gretta tonight. also tomorrow, bolling on at 2:00 pm and marco rubio as well. and i'll be on at 8:30. busy, busy, busy as a bee. juan? >> no, it's greg's turn. >> greg. >> there you go. >> greg's disturbing news. now if i told you that i had seen batman and robin and his sidecar motorcycle and robin was actually a dog, you would go, we need a breathalyzer or you are mentally ill or we're sending you away. not is the case. take a look at this. you have peter mcmahon, loving husband and a dog named jasper in a side car for the july parade costume contest. >> did they win? >> they won best pet. you know what i hate about this? this puts a lot of pressure on
2:59 pm
other husbands. what kind of husband would go to this length to please their wife, to do this? i do the dishes and think that i'm like the greatest. >> no, i know i couple who would. >> this dog has no idea what's going on. and if he did, he would hide from the other dogs. >> they would and he loves it. >> by the way, take a look at "the wall street journal" op-ed page. nice piece about education. i'm an old-fashioned kind of guy. i like it when sports stars stay with their teams and their fans. this was a tough weekend for me to see that kevin durant left the oklahoma city thunder to go to the golden state warriors. i didn't like it when tom severs left the mets, willie mays left the giants. didn't like it. don't like this after lebron james' terrible decision to leave cleveland and his heroic return and winning the championship, how is it possible that kd didn't get the message? >> i want to make people feel
3:00 pm
better about all they ate this weekend for the fourth of july. na nathan's hot dog eating contest, $10,000 if you win. joey chestnut broke the record, 70 hot dogs. previous record, 69. got to love it. a long string of incriminating evidence but the fbi director says hillary clinton should not be charged. this is "special report." good evening. welcome to washington. i'm doug mckelway. thousands of other work-related e-mails never turned in by hillary clinton. and more e-mails never to be found. james comey methodically put forward the damning evidence today, saying private e-mail use was careless but not criminal. we have team coverage. jennifer griffin is
207 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on