n side effects are headache, diarrhea, and dizziness. all my life, she's been there for me. now i am giving back. ask their doctor about once-daily namenda xr and learn about a free trial offer at namendaxr.com. i'm greg gutfeld with kimberly, juan williams, and she was once thrown from a sea horse, dana perino and this is "the five." as hearings go, this went as planned. it was long and motored like a constipated snake. as republicans chased the facts, democrats chased republicans. first, trey gowdy pilloried hillary on her lies. >> secretary clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails either sent or received. was that sflu >> that's not true. there were a small number of portion markings on three of the documents. >> secretary clinton said i did

not e-mail any classified material to anyone on my e-mail. there is no classified material. was this true? >> no, there was classified material e-mailed. >> secretary clinton said she used just one device. was that true? >> she used multiple devices during the four years of her term as secretary of state. >> secretary clinton said all work-related e-mails were returned to the state department. was that truesome >> no, we found work related e-mails, thousands, that were not returned. >> sharp, brutal, factual, pointed, like his hair. the democrat response? how dare you demand facts. >> today, house republicans are doing what they always do, using taxpayer money to continue investigating claims that have already been debunked just to keep them in the headlines one more day. so with apologies to you and the fbi for this blatantly partisan proceeding, let me return to the

facts of this case as you have clearly outlined them. >> i hope that this committee's effort is not intended to intimidate you or the fbi or law enforcement in general, or government employees. >> umm, yes, it was as formulaic as baby food, although he looked ready for the kentucky derby. what you left is what you came with, hillary clinton, a massive incompetent who got away with it because she's massively incompetent. that's comey's conclusion. her stupidity exonerates her. she just didn't know any better. that basement server doesn't et everyone have one? i thought it was for her husband's ashley madison account. republicans don't need to do too much and why democrats had to make it about attacks on comey, because the focus cannot be on hillary, or she'll be the

cheapest part of your breakfast, toast. even though comey didn't prosecute, he condemned her, and then he let her walk, which fed the already toxic belief that the clintons live by different rules and they have get busted. what america saw today was a college course on the clintons. corruption 101. and what the democratic party is left with is an extremely careless, highly negligent, insanely arrogant, entitled bungler. ie, just another democrat. hey, juan, pretty impressive day today i thought all around. smart for the democrats to portray it as a political witch hunt? >> with what's going on, i thought really i was surprised how aggressive they were with jim comey, because he's a republican -- >> they loved him. >> yeah, they loved him just the other day. but now they don't like jim comey. >> i thought they were respectful. >> in fact, they forced comey to say there was no different

standard. he says he has friends, and he's a republican, who say hey, you laid out the case, why didn't you indict her? and he said, name me one case in the last 40 years where gross negligence has led to an indictment on these charges. he said it just doesn't exist. and he had to say -- i mean, he had to come back and make it clear, no basis for a criminal charge. none at all. >> it's interesting, though, eric, does it matter? the stain is there. it's hard for -- it's funny watching democrats laud comey, who basically said their candidate is awful. >> i thought i was watching the opposite day. he's a republican. but one of the things that stood out, the intent argument. i found it very interesting that comey literally said i could find no intent on her part. and then they went through all the things that she did to hide 35,000 e-mails, they burned those e-mails. the burn bags and on and on. sure sounds like intent to me. but john mica was the star when

he said you have the highest profile of all investigations, people, looking at hillary clinton, she wants to be president. did you attend the meeting, the 3 1/2 hour meeting with hillary clinton? no, he didn't, comey didn't. well, who did? five or so agents did. did you debrief those agents? no, i didn't. really? one more, did you at least record that? no, no, we didn't record that. so you didn't attend, debrief or record. then how do you have the basis to conclude she shouldn't be indicted if you don't even have the access or at least the full knowledge of what went on in those 3 1/2 hours. >> of course they reported to the director. debrief is different than sending the report. if you and i do something -- >> it was a -- like a summary. it wasn't even actual testimony. >> the point is, what he's saying is they have emphasized transparency. that's why he went through the whole detail of what he thought

the facts, the evidence was, and ultimately rendered a conclusion and a recommendation for no prosecution. fantastic. how about some more transparency and provide a transcript, a list of questions and answers. well, that looks deceitful in and of itself. if you are that confident in your investigation and that it was fair and that justice is being served, why have you gone out of your way, number one, to interview at the last second and do the quickest turn around i've ever seen. and then say, exonerated. i mean, come on. he can't feel good about this. >> because they wanted to get it done before the convention. >> all of a sudden, a rush to judgment as in acquittal. >> the republicans can't lose with this, even if they don't get the answers to these questions. everything's out there about hillary. >> i don't think there's a lot of persuadable voters left.

if you are on the fence, it's like, another eight years of the clintons, can we take it? because comey did shred her argument. one of the other things that happened is when trey gowdy goes through that series of questions and comey has to answer, yes, she said this, that is not true. basically she did lie to congress. >> right. >> not just to congress, but the american people on multiple settings, in her press conferences, interviews. but the other thing, i think where comey fell down on this is when he said no reasonable prosecutor would have brought this. but prosecutors bring cases for much less -- >> right. >> -- all the time. and i'm very familiar with one case in washington, d.c., the valerie plame affair. that was where they knew who had leaked the information, and they still went after everybody in the west wing on some sort of a witch hunt and they tried to get scooter libby on that. the other thing is that comey also admits that if it were

($pá the fbi that had a top secret clearance and they had done what hillary clinton had done, they would have suffered consequences. >> right. >> so i think your point is correct, greg, that comey is confirming that hillary clinton believes she's above the law. unfortunately, indeed she is. >> to that point about security clearances, ron desantas questioning comey about security cleanses. roll it. >> in your statement you did point out that add min straytive and security consequences would be appropriate if someone demonstrated extreme carelessness. so those consequences, that would include termination of federal employment? >> correct. >> revocation of security clearance? >> yes. >> a potus with no security clearance that's interesting. so maybe just be a figurehead. what i thought was interesting,

comey basically said that she's completely incapable, that she's not sophisticated enough to recognize classification markings. this is a woman her core competency is she was supposed to be secretary of state but she wasn't able to render a basic determination to understand the seriousness of it and lied repeatedly about it. >> that to me is not believable. president obama said she's the most qualified person ever in the history of the world to run for president of the united states. this is a person who had top street appearance. she was on the armed services committee, so obviously she had access to intelligence information. it's not like she had never seen it before. so i thought that was -- >> let me offer it how you looked today. >> makes her look bad regardless. >> just listening to you guys, i

think this is what you said wasn't true, that they were going after comey. they really were. the republican congress -- >> they were focused so much on hillary asking him about hillary, that i don't think they ever said anything negative about comey. >> the idea was, if you laid out this case, why didn't you suggest there be a prosecution? and he had to say, this was totally impartial. i never met with the white house or the justice to let them know when i would speak or that i would speak. he made it clear, by the way, contrary to what we were discussing yesterday, that when he talks about this classified information, kimberly, he's talking about two or three documents, things that did not have a header that said "secret." what he said was, it had a little "c" in it and anybody reasonable person could have gone by it. so that's two documents. every republican congressman is looking to create the sound bite that would serve that audience. that would say oh, yeah, i asked the tough questions.

>> i disagree, eric. i thought this was so much more restraint -- >> because there's so many reasons. there's so much hypocrisy. yes, she did all these things and no, we're not going to call for an indictment. yet, if it were my staff, there could be firings and prosecution, but i didn't recommend that for hillary clinton. there's laws for regular people, and then another whole set of laws for hillary clinton, apparently. all he had to do, and the reason i point out this question, all james comey had to do, hillary clinton, did you or did you not send e-mails on your private server? where do you go with that? both answers indict her. >> you know what he said? >> because you can't lie to the fbi. >> he said today she never lied to the fbi. >> and gowdy showed that she lied on four different occasions. >> poor martha stewart went to

prison, right? for what? for lying to the investigators. >> it goes back to the question of why he decided to take the bullet for the administration, because kimberly, when he did that 14-minute statement, he could have stopped before the punchline, right? and said, that is our assessment and now we turn it over to the prosecutorers at the justice department to make a determination. but he fell on his sword -- >> he doesn't want the future of the country to hinge on a legal decision. i'm not sure. i think he thought it was the right thing to do. >> i think he did it to elect trump. he damaged hillary. >> that would be great spin. >> i'm make thing spin now. he did this because he knew that bernie had a chance and biden

had a chance, but he knew a damaged hillary couldn't beat trump. >> just take this ball and run with it as if it's a win. run all the way down the field. >> "the washington post" editorial today said that any fbi guy, normally if you decide there's no basis after the reports come in from the agent, the qualified investigator, you say there's no basis here, he should have said we're not recommending. but he spent 15 minutes and the post editorial said wow, this is out of line. he besmirched her reputation. imagine if somebody had investigated let's say the bush family, anybody, no, no prosecution. but here's what i think they did wrong and they were reckless. it seems as if it were personal. >> hugely important line, someone asked do you have an open investigation, do you find anything with the clinton foundation and he wouldn't say whether there's an open investigation. >> you know what the answer to

that is? oh, yeah. >> why would she have gone through all that bother of setting this up if it wasn't to help protect something bigger and more important, which was the pipeline to the clinton foundation. >> that's good logic. hillary clinton was cleared of a crime. so why is she still avoiding the press? that's next.

before i had the shooting, burning, pins-and-needles of diabetic nerve pain,

these feet were the first in my family to graduate from college, raised active twin girls, and trained as a nurse. but i couldn't bear my diabetic nerve pain any longer. so i talked to my doctor and he prescribed lyrica. nerve damage from diabetes causes diabetic nerve pain. lyrica is fda approved to treat this pain. lyrica may cause serious allergic reactions or suicidal thoughts or actions. tell your doctor right away if you have these, new or worsening depression, or unusual changes in mood or behavior. or swelling, trouble breathing, rash, hives, blisters, muscle pain with fever, tired feeling or blurry vision. common side effects are dizziness, sleepiness, weight gain and swelling of hands, legs, and feet. don't drink alcohol while taking lyrica. don't drive or use machinery until you know how lyrica affects you. those who have had a drug or alcohol problem may be more likely to misuse lyrica. now i have less diabetic nerve pain. and i love helping little ones get off on the right foot. ask your doctor about lyrica.

♪ fbi cleared hillary clinton of criminal wrongdoing. but we've yet to hear directly from the presumptive democratic nominee on the subject. this was great news for her. so why is she silent? reporters in the clinton main stream media say they've tried to ask her, but she's even dodging her. >> the challenge, though, what's been looming over her with these e-mails. we tried to talk to her here, and she made no mention of her e-mails in her speech. we weren't able to get her to answer a question, even though she had responded to a voter who was here and shouted at her into the crowd. so very calculated decision not to respond. >> so it's been 216 days since

clinton last held a news conference and clinton's former campaign secretary thinks she should appear before the public and at least apologize. >> she has admitted, very recently, that she has work to do when it comes to the trust factor. this would be an opportunity for her. she could step out there right now and say, look, the fbi said there was nothing illegal that happened. but that we made a lot of mistakes. you know what? they're right. we have made a lot of mistakes, and i can't regret that enough. here's what, as president, i would do moving forward to make sure no one makes those mistakes ever again. >> eric, that guy that was just speaking was the spokesperson for hillary clinton on the e-mail scandal, suggesting she should come out and apologize, which maybe should have been done from the beginning? >> maybe. but when you apologize, you assume there's going to be questions, and then at least you have a few questions to answer,

why did you lie and she doesn't want to do that. she had her campaign spokesperson say game over, case closed, move on. no, sorry. i think greg is right, this is an opportunity for trump and the republicans to say let's keep this story alive, because it proves her to be untrustworthy, the double standard that goes on in d.c. that's been trump's mantra from june 16th of last year. >> i'm so appreciative that you speak the truth. that's why you got to watch "the five," because eric will give you the inside scoop. we want to keep this alive on the republican paper, we're trying to undercut hillary clinton's game plan, she's beating the snot out of trump. >> i wouldn't go that far. >> i've got to ask kimberly, if you were advising her legally or from a pr stand point, you don't ever get in trouble for

something you did or say. >> she can't talk. she's lied so many times on this and other matters. that's why she has this serious credit problem. and the american people in large measure, do not agree with the fbi's decision to recommend no charges being filled. 54% say this is not appropriate. and now what you just had, which i find trey gowdy did a fantastic job, was going through it, one by one, fact by fact, to show how many times she lied and perpetrated a fraud on the american people. they don't like when you treat them like they're stupid and that's what she's done. and i think it's hugely problematic for her going forward. so she can't sate there so sanctimonious. she's really good getting out of doing bad things. >> i think she's been in public, but in disguise as kim jong-il.

>> declaring war on the united states? >> they certainly share the same wardrobe. i don't blame her for being in hiding, and bill is probably in hiding too, waiting for the bruises to heal. this is all going to come out in the debates. bill is not going to be able to meet trump on the tarmac and show pictures of his grand kids and talk about the golf game. she's going to be up there by herself and she's going to have to face the music, whether she likes it or not. >> let's turn the tables on you, because you're a pr pro. so one, i don't think you would have done what mo appleby did there with megyn kelly. but secondly, i think there's no political advantage for the candidate in speaking about this issue, and she earlier said she regretted it and it was a mistake. >> this is my prediction of what they will do.

around 6:00 a.m. tomorrow morning, the story will float and drive the news cycle tomorrow about she's narrowed her vice presidential choices down to three. they'll float the names out there and we'll talk about that for the next three days. >> loretta lynch. comey. >> the only way that they can change the subject and get her out there again is if they change the subject, and the only way to do that before the convention at this point is to announce her vp choices, at least that it's narrowed. >> who do you think it's going to be? >> i don't know. i don't think about that. but i think it will happen tomorrow. >> she lied, e-mail died. >> oh, boy. >> hash tag it. up next, two more police shootings are getting national attention. they've sparked protests in multiple cities. details and our reaction when "the five" return. this is brian.

every day, brian drives carefully to work. and every day brian drives carefully to work, there are rate suckers. he's been paying more for car insurance because of their bad driving for so long, he doesn't even notice them anymore. but one day brian gets snapshot from progressive. now brian has a rate based on his driving, not theirs. get snapshot and see just how much your good driving could save you. ...one of many pieces in my i havlife.hma... so when my asthma symptoms kept coming back on my long-term control medicine. i talked to my doctor and found a missing piece in my asthma treatment with breo. once-daily breo prevents asthma symptoms. breo is for adults with asthma not well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. breo won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. breo opens up airways to help improve breathing for a full 24 hours. breo contains a type of medicine that increases the risk of death from asthma problems

and may increase the risk of hospitalization in children and adolescents. breo is not for people whose asthma is well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. once your asthma is well controlled, your doctor will decide if you can stop breo and prescribe a different asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. do not take breo more than prescribed. see your doctor if your asthma does not improve or gets worse. ask your doctor if 24-hour breo could be a missing piece for you. see if you're eligible for 12 months free at mybreo.com. ♪uh oh. oh. henry! oh my. good, you're good. back, back, back. (vo) according to kelley blue book, subaru has the highest resale value of any brand. again. you might find that comforting. love. it's what makes a subaru, a subaru.

♪ controversies have erupted again over the use of police force on minorities in america after two more deadly shootings this week. the justice department has opened a civil rights probe after 37-year-old alton sterling was killed outside a louisiana store on tuesday. he was shot several times while being held on the ground by police. and last night, a minnesota traffic stop turned deadly when a police officer opened fire on a black driver. his girlfriend captured the moments afterwards on video, live streamed on facebook. >> he shot him three times, because we had a busted taillight. he asked him for license and registration. he told him that it was in his wallet, but he had a pistol on him because he's licensed to carry, and the officer told him

don't move and as he was putting his hands back up, the officer shot him in his arm about four or five times. >> minnesota's governor mark dayton said today he doesn't believe castille would have been shot if he had been white. both men had guns on them. in both cases, they had permits to carry the gun. >> did they? >> castile definitely did. >> i don't think sterling had a permit, because he had a long rap sheet. >> but sterling was not threatening the officer. >> the trouble with these stories when they come to light, there's a tendency to rush to judgment and it almost guaranties whatever you say right now will be riding on less facts than people intimately involved in this case know. so whatever i'm saying, i can say right now. i know almost nothing. i'm okay with saying that. i will say this, these are

vastly different cases. but we have this tendency to join all of these incidents together, which adds to a sweeping assumption about the world. but each one of these cases has to be looked at separately. you have to look at the questions that you had. castile, was he told not to reach for anything? because the filming started after. did the cop say, please don't reach, and he reached. with sterling, there was a call about him having a gun. when they were wrestling and somebody is shouting, he's got a gun, was he reaching for the gun? all i know is the rush to judgment is not helpful. can i contrast the stories about terror? because we know with terror, the motives is always clear, the information is offered immediately on facebook or twitter when the terrorist announces his motives and shouts allegiance to his god as he kills people. terrorists tell you what's going

on. in situations like these, you have confrontations, a mix of impulses and emotions and unforeseen intentions, confusing intentions that all erupt and parts of it get caught on tape. that's why it's the worst thing to be talking about, because you feel like you just don't know anything, and i'm happy to say i don't know anything. >> finally an admission. >> dana, the governor says wouldn't the shooting in minnesota wouldn't have happened if the man was white. >> well, again, it's going back to what greg is saying. for example, remember when the egypt air flight blew up about six weeks ago and they were calling on both candidates -- well, donald trump said it's definitely terror. hillary clinton was reluctant and she kind of got slammed for that. it turns out the reports are coming back that there might have been a fire inside the plane, so it might not have been terrorism. so when people are in positions

of power comment quickly, sometimes they have to revise their remarks. comey in orlando, remember the first hours of the attack said there's nothing the fbi would have done differently. that's not true. i respect the governor's statement, and if he thinks that's true, he knows his community well and maybe he felt like he had enough information to say that. i don't know if that's true. >> eric, i'm always concerned this there's much more black on black murder than ever perpetrated by the police. but when i see that this catches fire on social media, i think to myself, i understand why people are upset. if it was me or my son, you know, i just don't get it. so i just wanted to see, do you understand why black folks might be upset at the continuation -- >> after seeing both of those videotapes, i would say yes. i'm upset at watching it. it's certain what we saw. but to greg and dana's point, i'll give you the biggest example recently.

hands up, don't shoot. it was shorted that michael brown had his hands up and got shot and it was absolutely proven false in the aftermath. and it changed the facts of the case. well, immediately it was he was guilty. the officer was guilty when he heard hands up, don't shoot. so there was 600,000 law enforcement officers in this country. the vast majority of them are great cops. sometimes they make a mistake. that south carolina cop shooting the guy as he ran away, he went to jail for that. if they find that this officer, everything that videotape shows, i'm sure he's going to be in trouble, as well. but we don't know the facts. certainly can we hold off judgment about color? because if that guy was white and that cop was as nervous as he was, he was petrified, his hands were shaking, it doesn't matter what color he was, he was probably going to pull the

trigger. >> i spent a majority of my time as a prosecutor as part of the officer involved shooting team. this was my job, i investigated cases like this where you roll out as a team, you do the crime scene investigation. you investigate the police department. you have to clear the shooting as to whether or not it is a good shooting, which involves taking statements from everybody, anybody that was recording on a cell phone, sending text messages. there was an eyewitness at the time. all that comes into play, and the police have to cooperate. they have to be able to give the statements right then and this. they don't get to leave. you go through all of it. i believe that justice will prevail here. they'll do a thorough investigation. you have doj and civil rights lawyers going over this and making sure. because yes, it's illuminating. but you have to take into account people that are there, who are participating and what did they know going in? the one thing i tell everyone,

please, you can work it out later in court. listen, comply, do what they say. tell everyone to stay calm. identify if you have a weapon. >> in the minnesota case, that's exactly what the woman said, that the guy said it, officer, i'm carrying a concealed weapon. then he does let me see my license and the shooting happens. >> you know what exonerates good cops? body cameras. >> but they didn't work in louisiana. they fell off. next, donald trump paid a visit to capitol hill today, again trying to unite republicans. what paul ryan thought about the meeting, straight ahead.

americans are buying more and more of everything online. and so many businesses rely on the united states postal service to get it there. that's why we make more ecommerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country. the united states postal service. priority: you

donald trump made his way back to capitol hill to meet with republicans in the house and the senate, as he continues his push to unite his party.

speaker paul ryan had some nice words to say about trump's visit. >> we had a very good exchange on lots of ideas and policy issues. i thought it was a very good meeting and it's clear he's working on putting together a strong general election campaign. he's got the convention coming up. but what i thought was helpful today was our members got access and got to ask questions and talk about their issues. so i thought it was a very good meeting. >> trump met with his former gop rival ted cruz, the first time the two met since cruz suspended his campaign and here is the senator on what was discussed during that one on one. >> we had a positive and productive meeting this morning with donald trump. donald asked me to speak at the republican convention, and i told him i would be happy to do so. >> what else was discussed during the meeting? >> there was no discussion of any endorsement. he asked me to speak at the convention and i said i would be glad to do so.

>> dana, what about the significance of this? >> ted cruz had enough delegates amassed under the rules he could speak any way if he chose to. but i think it was polite and smart and good strategy for trump to go to cruz and say i would like to have you speak and cruz said yes. so we have that speech to look forward to. i also thought what paul ryan said, for the first time, that's kind of the first time a lot of those members have been in the same room as donald trump. so i'm sure trump had to listen to a lot of people give him advice. when you go to capitol hill, that's one thing you will find, everyone has a suggestion on how to do things better. i don't think the senate meeting went as well. trump being disappointed with slate not being behind him. so it's a little tense on the senate side. >> a lot of drama.

like ""melrose place."" so what do you make of it? is ted cruz helpful? >> people are vocal and they're a good sport and they represent a lot of the base. i think that will be good. but what was real important today is that paul ryan is the one who extended the olive branch and said donald trump, come talk to the members of congress. the way i understand it, almost all of the gop members, only a handful didn't show up. so meetness the past, a lot of members pushed back, but the way i understand it, almost all of them, just about all of them showed up. that's good. you like to see the party uniting behind the guy that is not clinton. >> and also on the heels of this recommendation by the fbi, despite the litany of evidence of crimes committed, people might say wait a second, maybe we really do need to unite and get behind the gop nominee when you look at the alternative,

hillary clinton. >> hillary is the big uniter. she really is. bobby knight is speaking. i'm wondering if he'll be throwing chairs at the never-trump people. >> "the wall street journal" said they may have enough delegates to vote for whoever they want, which would throw that convention into chaos. >> on both sides, it feels like they have the same problem. they both feel like shotgun weddings. the left is nervous about hillary. the right is worried about trump. it's interesting how it happened on both sides. >> bernie said he was going to endorse on tuesday. >> listen, don't knock shotgun weddings. [ laughter ] hill today.

did hillary clinton lie under oath? the fbi's director's answer to that, next. with my moderate to severe crohn's disease,... ...i was always searching for ways to manage my symptoms. i thought i had it covered. then i realized managing was all i was doing. when i finally told my doctor, he said humira was for people like me who have tried other medications,... but still experience the symptoms of moderate to severe crohn's disease. in clinical studies,

the majority of patients on humira saw significant symptom relief... ...and many achieved remission. humira can lower your ability to fight infections... ...including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers,... including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions,... ...and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb,... ...hepatitis b, are prone to infections, ...or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. if you're still just managing your symptoms, ask your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible.

snend sned ♪

back now to the gripping hearing on capitol hill today. the fbi director testified on his agency's decision to clear hillary clinton of criminal wrongdoing after determining she was extremely careless with some of america's top secrets. here's chairman jason chaffetz. >> did hillary clinton lie under oath? >> not to the fbi, not on a case we were working. >> did you review the documents where congress jim jordan asked her specifically and she said "there was nothing marked classified on my e-mails, either sent or received." >> i don't remember reviewing that particular testimony. i'm aware of that being said. >> did the fbi investigate her statements under oath on this topic? >> not to my knowledge. >> missed it by that much. >> that really bothers bill o'reilly. he's going to talk about it later tonight. >> what doesn't bother bill o'reilly?

>> he's got a list. >> i know. i'm on the top. >> i think that there's something that juan was saying earlier, that these are campaign ads for republicans. yes, that's true, but i believe this is going to hurt more down-ticket democrats than democrats realize. if you're a down-ticket republican, everybody is going to ask you all the time, what do you think trump said this, he tweeted that, and you are always having to figure out a way to answer that. i think now this question will be put to every democrat down ticket and every house republican and democrat debate, do you agree that hillary clinton should not have been indicted? if the polls are correct, and the majority of people believe she should have been, it probably hurts democrats down picket even more than hillary clinton at the top. >> i think you're right about that. i think it's pretty deadly for her. >> and for them.

>> it hurts the democrats and anybody that's looking to keep a little slice -- >> i go back to my original point. you don't need to give lifts to lebron james. this story is so damning to hillary clinton, you don't have to make it bigger than it is. the campaign ads need to be specific and short. the secretary of state jeopardized the state. it's done. you do this relentlessly, you make her into an incompetent bungler. >> juan? >> i don't think it's -- certainly it's a story which she brought on herself. she didn't need this trouble and it's self-inflicted in my opinion. but i think that most democrats really don't care much about it at this point. >> they're cool being lied to. >> it's not they're cool being lied to. they just feel it's been so highly politicized at this point -- >> the democrats would never do that. >> that's fair. so eye for an eye. but at this point, how much damage does it do to hillary

clinton? i don't know. and i think the attacks on comey today don't help the republicans. >> so she's not going to be administered justice through the legal channels, maybe she'll get a little justice electorally and politically. >> i think a lot of damage has been done. >> by? >> by comey, branding her as an incompetent and letting her go. he just told everybody, she got away with it. >> we're talking about how hillary unites the gop, which is true. but trump, instead of letting it go, he had the saddam hussein thing, then -- >> he's got to learn. >> the anti-semitic symbols. >> he's not going to. >> he just can't help himself. >> first of all, six-point star is not anti-semitic. it's on disney comic books and what not. it wasn't his. it was one of his social media people who tweeted it.

>> he said we had no reason to take it down. >> he said they should have left it up. >> that's what he said. >> we'll leave it right there. "one more thing" up next. in a world that's trying to turn you into someone new...

...one hair color wants to help you keep on being you. nice'n easy. natural-looking color... ...that even in sunlight, doesn't look like hair color... it just looks like you. nice'n easy: color as real as you are. &

in a world held back by compromise, businesses need the agility to do one thing & another. only at&t has the network, people, and partners to help companies be... local & global. open & secure. because no one knows & like at&t. ♪ back with one more thing. let's go to this.

perhaps the most important election of 2016, it's not hillary clinton and trump. it's the all-star game on fox on july 12th. brandon belt is one of the five finalists to be in the game. he's a friend of mine and he's a great guy, a great fox fan. you have until 4:00 p.m. east coast to vote for him. go to mlb.com/vote. 4:00 p.m. tomorrow. it's 1:00 p.m. east coast time. >> you're really good at that. >> 1:00 pacific. there you go. i'm done. so i'll see you guys later. >> so i'm doing something completely different. i was watching the comey testimony. roll some videotape of that. i always like to see what goes on in the background. mark halperin sitting right behind comey for the whole testimony. i realized those guys are the

two that do "the circus" on showtime. i love that show. if you're a political junkie, check out that show. >> i'm just a junkie. any way, kimberly? >> okay. so kimberly's adorable news. >> wait a second. that's my arena. >> oh, my god. okay, let's wrestle for it later and see who wins. >> that's all it took? >> yes, this is very cute. so this is 3-year-old texas, a dog who only flies on private jets. you know why? because his family owns a company called private fly, so he gets to work on board. he greets poem. he hangs out. he goes and investigates some of the more curious passengers. he particularly loves meeting with the cats around parents. look at him, there he is in the

board room. he's never flown commercial. you could bring casper, because they have pet beds. >> i need to know more about this. and i need your credit card. >> he has no idea what he does for a living. >> kind of like you. >> bomb sniffing dog on a plane, better, right? >> as long as he's only sniffing out bombs. >> not bums? [ laughter ] >> very good, very good, dana. >> dana's health tip. you've heard about the tech claw, like when your hand gets cramped, you get the ipad hand. there's a new ailment that's plaguing people across the world, and it's called the selfie elbow, because apparently when you are reaching out to -- it's like golfer's elbow, you're gripping with your hand so far, you have your elbow at this weird angle, and people are

having to go to doctor for a selfie elbow. so i thought it was important before we get to the conventions, that we tell eric about this possible problem, because these are just some of the pictures i found at the white house correspondent's dinner. and i don't want you to get help. this is just a little sampling. good pictures. >> what about the selfie that you did with -- >> look at that one. >> al roker. >> that's why you need to get the selfie stick. >> so i was looking at a survey of the american society of nutritionists and asked what are healthy foods. it's good to eat popcorn, shrimp, good to have wine, sushi. sushi is good for you. what's not good for you? granola bars, frozen yogurt. even slim fast shakes. the public thinks they're good,

but the nutritionists say stay away. i'm always curious, what should i eat? >> juan's nutrition news. >> "special report" is up next. the fbi director grilled on capitol hill during a five-hour emergency hearing. and now both hillary clinton supporters and critics are pulling quotes from that hearing that has now sparked a new investigation. this is "special report." ♪ good evening. welcome to washington. i'm bret baier. republican lawmakers grilled james comey for nearly five years over the hillary clinton e-mail investigation. he admitted to the house oversight committee that hillary clinton wasn't truth it will publicly about her use of a private server, but he added that she didn't lie