of people who already have student debt by making it easier to refinance and repay what you owe as a portion of your income so you don't have to pay more than you can afford. [ cheers and applause ] it is just not right that donald trump can ignore his debts but students and families can't refinance their debt. and here's something else that i really want to emphasize. i don't think anybody in america is talking about this enough. and that is a four-year degree should not be the only path to a good job in america. [ cheers and applause ] you should be able to learn a skill, practice a trade, make a good living doing it. so many americans have the talent and the will to succeed. whether they're kids right out

of high school or older people displaced by automation and outsourcing. and for too long, big promises about the power of training and retraining haven't delivered like they should. it doesn't help anybody to be trained for a job that doesn't exist. so here's what we're going to do. we will support high quality union training programs. [ cheers and applause ] we will propose new tax credits to encourage more companies to offer paid apprenticeships that led you earn while you learn. [ applause ] we will do more, including a national campaign to dignify skills training across the board. i think we've got to reverse what has become a kind of commonplace view, which is

everybody needs to go to college. well, in fact more than half of the jobs that are going to be available in 2020 do not require a college four-year degree. so for welders and machinists and tool and die makers and health technicians, coders and so many others, let's get the word out. there are really good jobs for people right now, and there will be more in the future if you get the skills in high school, at community college, in an apprenticeship, or other training programs. [ cheers and applause ] and i want to acknowledge the great role that the community college here in macomb county has played in working with companies like this one to make sure people do have the skills. i imagine some of you might be thinking, that all sounds good,

but what about trade? after all, trump talks about it all the time. well, let's start with this. it is true that too often, past trade deals have been sold to the american people with rosy scenarios that did not pan out. those promises now ring hollow in many communities across michigan and our country that have seen factories close and jobs disappear. too many companies lobbied for trade deals so they could sell products abroad, but then they instead moved abroad and sold back into the united states. it is also true that china and other countries have gamed the system for too long. enforcement, particularly during the bush administration, has been too lax. investments at home that would make us more competitive have

been completely blocked in congress. and american workers and communities have paid the price. but the answer is not to rant and rave or cut ourselves off from the world. that would end up killing even more jobs. the answer is to finally make trade work for us, not against us. so my message -- [ applause ] my message to every working in michigan and across america is this. i will stop any trade deal that kills jobs or holds down wages, including the trans-pacific partnership. [ cheers and applause ] i oppose it now. i'll oppose it after the election. and i'll oppose it as president. as a senator from new york, i fought to defend new york's manufacturers and steel makers from unfair chinese trading

practices. and i opposed the only multilateral trade deal that came before the senate while i was there, because it didn't meet my high bar. and as secretary of state, i fought hard for american businesses to get a fair shot around the world and to stop underhanded trading practices like currency manipulation and the theft of international property. as president, i will stand up to china and anyone else who tries to take advantage of american workers and american companies. [ cheers and applause ] and i'm going to ramp up enforcement by appointing for the first time a chief trade prosecutor. i will triple the number of enforcement officers. and when countries break the rules, we won't hesitate to impose targeted tariffs.

[ applause ] now, mr. trump may talk a big game on trade, but his approach is based on fear, not strength. fear that we can't compete with the rest of the world, even when the rules are fair. fear that our country has no choice but to hide behind walls. if team usa was as fearful as trump, michael phelps and simone biles would be cowering in the locker room, afraid to come out and compete. [ cheers and applause ] instead, they're winning gold medals. america isn't afraid to compete. right now thousands of michigan companies are exporting billions of dollars of products around the world.

we want them to sell even more and create even more jobs here at home. but corporations should not abandon profitable operations here in the united states to move abroad, just to give shareholders a quicker return. ceos a bigger bonus. and unions a weaker hand to play. now, before he tweets. [ cheers and applause ] about how he's really the one who will put america first in trade, let's remember where trump makes many of his own products, because it sure is not america. [ cheers and applause ] he's made trump ties in china and trump suits in mexico instead of here in michigan.

he keeps saying it's not possible to make these things in america anymore. that's just wrong. so we created a website. hillaryclinton.com/makeithere. [ cheers and applause ] on it we list 100 places across the united states that are already producing similar goods. now, one positive thing trump could do to make america great again is actually make great things in america again. [ applause ] now, let's look at the second question. which candidate will fight for fairness? and this is an urgent need. we need to grow the economy and we need to make it fairer. the tide is not rising fast enough. and it is certainly not lifting all boats. since the crash, too many of the gains have gone to the top 1%. the rules and incentives in our

system reward corporations for putting short term stock prices above long term investments in their workers, equipment, and research. while corporate profits are near record highs, paychecks for most people have barely budged. incomes aren't growing fast enough to keep up with the costs of living like prescription drugs to childcare. i believe every employee, from the ceo suite to the factory floor, contributes to a business's success. so everybody should share in the rewards. [ cheers and applause ] especially those putting in long hours for little pay. so i'm proposing a new tax credit to encourage more companies to share profits with workers. and more broadly, we will fight for a more progressive, more patriotic tax code that puts american jobs first.

right now, when a corporation outsources jobs and production, it can write off the costs. we must stop that. and we must make them pay back any tax break they ever received from any level of government in our country. [ cheers and applause ] and for those that move their share of rs overseas to avoid taxes, they're going to have to pay a new exit tax. if they want to go, they'll have to pay to go. [ cheers and applause ] and wall street corporations and the super rich should finally pay their fair share of taxes. that's why i support the so-called buffett rule. because multi-millionaires should not be able to pay a lower tax rate than their

secretaries. [ applause ] we should also add a new tax on multi-millionaires and close the carried interest loop role, interest i have advocated for years. now, compare what trump says. there is a myth out there that he will stick it to the rich and powerful because somehow he's really on the side of the little guy. don't believe it. not when he pledges to rip up basic rules that hold corporations accountable, when he wants to scrap regulations that stop polluters from poisoning the air our children breathe and the water they drink, let insurance companies write their own rules again. trump would roll back the tough rules that we have imposed on

the financial industry. i'll do the opposite. i think we should strengthen those rules so wall street can never wreck main street again. [ applause ] trump even wants to abolish the consumer financial protection bureau, a new agency that has already returned more than $11 billion to 25 million americans who were taken advantage of by corporations. why would you get rid of that? and then there is trump's tax plan. he would give trillions in tax cuts to big corporations, millionaires and wall street money managers. that would explode our national debt and eventually lead to massive cuts in priorities like education, health care, and environmental protection. in his speech on monday, he called for a new tax loophole.

let's call it the trump loophole. because it would allow him to pay less than half the current tax rate on income from many of his companies. he would pay a lower rate than millions of middle class families. one nonpartisan expert at the tax policy center described this plan as, and i quote, a really nice deal for donald trump. of course it's hard to say how nice, because he refuses to do what every other presidential candidate in decades has done, and release his tax returns. [ cheers and applause ] but we do know that the 400 richest taxpayers in america would get an average tax cut of more than $15 million a year from the trump loophole. and then there's the estate tax,

which trump wants to eliminate altogether. now, if you believe that he's as wealthy as he says, that alone would save the trump family $4 billion. it would do nothing for 99.8% of americans. so they would get a $4 billion tax cut and 99.8% of americans would get nothing. just think of what we could do with those $4 billion. we could pay for more than 47,000 veterans to get a four-year college degree. we could provide a year's worth of health care to nearly 3 million kids. or we could fund a year's worth of federal assistance to state and local law enforcement. i think there are a lot of better ways to spend the money. on monday, i'm going to be in scrant scranton, pennsylvania with vice president biden. and he has a saying, don't tell me what you value.

show me your budget and i will tell you what you value. well -- [ applause ] -- donald trump wants to give trillions in tax breaks to people like himself. i want to invest it in veterans, our kids, police officers, and so much more. and you can then draw your own conclusions about values. now, it's true that both of us have proposed to cut taxes for middle class families. he's making a big promise. but his advisors, his own advisers have said he may not stand by them. instead, the tax cuts he doubled down on in his speech in detroit on monday offer trillions to the richest americans and corporations. and what are the differences between donald trump and me? i'm telling you what i will do. i'm laying out my plans. and i will stand by them and

want you to hold me accountable for delivering results. [ cheers and applause ] this all reminds me of that old saying. if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. and that brings us to the third question. which candidate can you actually count on to go to bat for workers and working families? it's not enough to pay lip service to being on your side. we have to recognize how americans actually live and work in the 21st century and then offer real solutions that make your lives easier. we know that women are now the sole or primary breadwinner in a growing number of families. we know more americans are cobbling together part-time work or striking out on their own. so we have to make it easier to be good workers, good parents, and good caregivers, all at the same time. that's why i've set out a bold vision to make quality

affordable childcare available to all americans and limit the cost to 10% of family income. [ cheers and applause ] on monday, trump offered his first real ideas on this topic, because previously he had dismissed concerns about childcare. he said it was, quote, not an expensive thing because you just need some blocks and some swings. now he says he wants to exclude childcare payments from taxation. his plan was panned from the left, the right, the center, because it transparently is designed for rich people like him. he would give wealthy families 30 or 40 cents on the dollar for their nannies, and little or nothing for millions of hard working families trying to afford childcare so that they can get to work and keep the jobs. [ cheers and applause ]

i think instead, we should expand the child tax credit to provide real relief to tens of millions of working families struggling with the costs of raising children. the same families that his plan ignores. and that's just a start. because the more we do to help working families, the more our entire economy will benefit. for example, guaranteeing equal pay won't just increase paychecks for women. it will boost family budgets and get incomes rising across the board. [ cheers and applause ] i don't understand why trump is against that. paid family leave won't only make life easier for moms and dads, it will also keep skilled, talented americans in the workforce and grow our economy. that's why every other advanced country already has it. again, he's against it. raised the federal minimum wage

won't just put more money in the pockets of low income families. it also means they will spend more at the businesses in their neighborhoods. [ cheers and applause ] this is something that even the original automakers understood, way back at the beginning of the 20th century, when they decided to pay the unbelievable sum of $5 a day to auto workers. and when they were criticized by other businesses, how can you pay that much? they had the best answer. we want people to be able to buy our cars. this is economics 101. we need to get incomes and wages rising, and it will help the whole economy grow and be fairer. [ applause ] and protecting and expanding social security doesn't just help older americans retire with dignity. it helps to ease burdens on

families and communities. and i also believe the same thing about comprehensive immigration reform. we already have millions of people working in the economy and paying $12 billion a year to social security even though they are undocumented. so by moving toward reform, we will unleash a lot of new income and growth. and we will level the playing field so that american workers can't be taken advantage of because undocumented workers can be exploited by employers, which is one of the reasons we have this disconnect. [ applause ] and finally, strengthening unions doesn't just serve members. it leads to better pay and benefits and working conditions for all employees. [ cheers and applause ]

i've also said i will defend and improve the affordable care act. and for me that includes giving americans in every state the choice of a public option health insurance plan that will help everybody afford coverage. it will strengthen competition and drive down costs. now, these are all causes i've worked on for decades. and i believe they point to a fundamental truth in our country. it can seem like a zero sum, if you're competing for a job or a promotion or a contract. someone wins and someone loses. but that's not the full picture. if you step back, you see we're all in this together. if we can all grow together, we can all rise together. because i like to say we are stronger together. that's why the fourth question, the fourth question is key. and it's this. who can bring people together to get any of this done?

right? well, i believe i can, because i think i can provide serious, steady leadership that can find common ground and build on it based on hard but respectful bargaining with the other side. leadership that rises above personal attacks and name calling, not revels in it. i just don't think insults and bullying is how we're going to get things done. and i don't think that that's the appropriate approach for us. i know it's hard to imagine, but there was a time when democrats and republicans actually worked together. i know that's true. i did it as first lady, senator, and secretary of state. it's how we created the children's health insurance program which covers 8 million kids. [ applause ] it's how we rebuilt new york

after 9/11 and how we passed a treaty reducing the threat from russia's nuclear weapons. so i am convinced based on my experience that we can do this. one of the reasons i asked senator tim kaine to be my running mate is that he also has a record of working across the aisle to get things done as a mayor, a governor, and a senator. so we're going to make full use of the white house's power to convene. we're going to get everyone at the table, not just republicans and democrats, but businesses and labor unions, academics, but most importantly, americans like all of you. [ cheers and applause ] i think there are a lot of great ideas out in america, and i want you to have a say in your government. and that's means we've got to get unaccountable money out of politics, overturn citizens

united, and expand voting rights, not restrict them. [ cheers and applause ] i intend starting even before the election to bring together leaders from across our economy, from a lot of different places, to talk about jobs and competitiveness. and i hope mark and john can join me, because we need the best ideas that are out there making a difference. we need to pull together. the bottom line is this. i'm running for president to build an economy that works for everyone, not just those at the top. [ cheers and applause ] based on what we know from the trump campaign, he wants america to work for him and his friends at the expense of everyone else. he's offered no credible plans to address what working families are up against today. nothing on student loans or the cost of prescription drugs,

nothing for farmers or struggling rural communities. nothing to build a new future with clean energy and advanced agriculture. nothing for communities of color in our cities to overcome the barriers of systemic racism. nothing to create new opportunities for young people. just a more extreme version of the failed theory of trickle down economics with his own addition of outlandish trumpian ideas that even republicans reject. [ cheers and applause ] and as we heard him say at his convention, he may believe that he alone can fix our country, but clearly he doesn't know the people of michigan. he doesn't see the businesses and the labor unions, the local governments, the clergy, coming together every single day to make things better. so yes, there is still a long road ahead. but michigan is on the rise.

and everyone is contributing. that's america at its best. so i hope you will stay active and engaged and working together to create jobs and to strengthen your own communities. and i hope you will. work to get out the vote in november, because if we -- [ cheers and applause ] if we are able to win, then i want you all to work with me to build the kind of progress that america deserves to see. we're going to do this together. we are stronger together. let's go out and build the future. thank you all. god bless you. [ cheers and applause ] >> hillary clinton laying out her message on the economy and jobs in a place that's lost plenty of them, michigan, and the communities around detroit. hello from "america's election headquarters," i'm shannon bream. mrs. clinton attacking trump saying he hasn't offered any

credible solutions for the very real economic challenges we face, and continuing her criticism that he doesn't actually make anything in america. here now, my colleagues from the fox business network, the anchor of "countdown to the closing bell," and charlie gasparino. she says she'll work with both parties. hasn't happened so far. >> that's absolutely true. but that's an easy statement to throw out. we're going to make an investment in jobs. president george w. bush did a lot of investment in job training and it hasn't been working. we need more granularity. i found this a fascinating speech, it was very populist but was mixed with things that really mirrored what donald trump has talked about, whether it's infrastructure or certain tax changes for working families.

and of course as you look at all of this you say, are they more different or more similar? >> there were definitely some parallels we saw. charlie, one of the biggest lines we got was going after the wealthy, wall street, big corporations, make sure they pay their fair share. we talked about about what is paying what. the top 1% in this country paying 43.6% of the taxes and half the country not paying anything at all. >> and a lot of them paying that are small businesses, which she conveniently left out. me as a freelance wire, i do my taxes as a subchapter s, an individual. we t businesses that basically employee most of the people in the country and fall within that sweet spot that she's absolutely going to crush. she will crush small businesses with this plan, no way around it. i guess the upper rate starts at something like $700,000 a year,

right where those small businesses that employ most of the people are. it was a good speech, but light on the details. she didn't get into taxes. she said i'm going to tax the rich. she didn't say how and who are those rich people. by the way, barack obama at least said he considered a rich family, $250,000 family of four, he considered that rich. he at least spelled it out. she is not spelling out numbers, which means she knows he's vulnerable on the issue. >> guess what, shannon? both of these people have not figured out a way to bring down the deficit, which was a big clarion call over the last several years, a ballooning deficit of $1 trillion. both their plans over ten years absolutely add to the deficit. ironically donald trump's adds something like 10 to $12 trillion over ten years. herself adds several hundred billion.

neither talks about really big detail on how it would spur growth. that's what we need right now. >> interesting that she talked about today, she had she wants to work on things that will unleash private industry. but one of the main criticisms of her is that she's big on regulations. >> it's totally up criticihypoc from that at some time. listen, they both deserve criticism because they don't talk about entitlement reform. to go after infrastructure, ridiculous. barack obama did that. where she is really duplicitous is on taxes, she won't say how small businesses will get screwed, and on regulations. regulations is choking the banking industry. they're not lending money to small businesses. it's choking environmental regulations, it's choking businesses. obamacare is choking small businesses. because if you get -- if you hire over a certain amount of people, you get hit with these obamacare taxes. and that forces businesses --

let me tell you something, she won't even go near there. >> you have viewers right now who have thought to business ideas, they try to attack it and open it, the regulation is so onerous it's like choking on red tape. she really talked about more regulations, specifically she talked about for wall street, i'm not sure that that resonates with your viewers. >> she's for environmental regulations. >> it all costs money. >> she wants to cut regulation that is non-safety-related, that's nice for people would want to start businesses to hear. >> he's strong on the regulation side. we're fair and balanced, we're working on hillary now, but he's strong on regulations. if you take on dodd/frank, businesses can start boring rowing money again. >> thank you both for lending us your expertise. one subject mrs. clinton

didn't bring up, the newly released state department e-mails that demonstrate contacts between a donor to the clinton foundation and top clinton aides when she was secretary of state. a spokesperson for one of those donors is speaking up, saying the donor just passed along observations and insights about lebanon. but the conservative watchdog group judicial watch believes the contact was improper and suggests the donor was looking for favors from the state department. let's bring in sarah huckabee sanders, senior adviser for the trump campaign, and david goodfriend, former staff secretary to president bill clinton. good to have you both. >> thank you. >> good to be here, thank you. >> david, about those e-mails, not something that mrs. clinton wants to talk about, that makes sense. let's talk a little bit about a pledge that she made when she was going into the role of secretary of state. we've got a quote here. she said, for the duration of my appointment as secretary, if i'm confirmed, i will not participate personally and substantially in any particular matter involving specific parties in which the william j. clinton foundation or the clinton global initiative is a

party or represents a party unless i am first authorized to participate. do you feel she stuck to that pledge, david? >> well, we're talking here about two different things. we have the timing of these e-mails being released. and then the substance of the issue which i'll get to. but the timing is very telling. >> these could have been released a long time ago. >> excuse me. i'm going to finish my -- >> they were found by another group. >> yes, a conservative funded judicial watch group whose candidate is losing by seven points across the country. so now they're trying to change the subject away from donald trump's ridiculous statements and failed plans. >> if she had released these years ago when she was supposed to -- >> actually i believe what you're talking about is the judicial watch e-mails they found through a foia request of state department. judicial watch being a conservative group trying to throw a bone to their candidate, donald trump, is an attempt to change the subject away from what we just heard, which is an

excellent speech supported by republican analysts as better for the economy than trump's plan. if i were a trump person now, i too would want to change the subject because trump is losing and his economic plan doesn't measure up to i wihillary's. let's be fair and balanced with the audience here. the timing matters. it's an attempt at this trump's supporters like judicial watch to change the way that their candidate is losing. >> these are e-mails that the clinton team did not release when they were requested i mean, months and months ago. so the fact that they're coming now as the result of a foia request that was finally fulfilled by the state department, with that in mind, sarah, there's been plenty of criticism of donald trump's speech of his economic plan as well by people on the left and the right. i want to put up a poll. when voters are asked who they trust to handle the economy, there's been a shift. back in may, trump was leading this by eight points. that gap has now closed axial,

trumps now at 50%, clinton at 45%. he's lost 3%, she's picked up 4. and a lot of people seem to like what she had to say today. >> well, i think that's still yet to be determined. but going back to what david said on the e-mail scandal, if the best defense that they have is that the timing is bad, i think that tell us every single thing we need to know. the american people don't care about the timing, they care about whether she broke the law and lied about it and whether she's disqualified from being president of the united states. she lied, she tried to cover it up and should be disqualified from being president of the united states. >> keep trying. it's not working. it's not working. you can keep trying, but it's not working. >> david has a good point, the polling shows it's not working. >> i don't think that's true. i think that it is working, because i'm hearing about it all day, every day. but i think the media is not talking about it, they're so busy picking apart little things that donald trump says instead

of all the things that hillary clinton has done. she loves to say that words matter. secretary clinton, so do actions. as a career politician, you've got nothing to show for the last several decades of work inside the government that you've done other than corruption and incompetence. i think the american people do care about that. i think as we get closer to november and day in, day out, you'll see that contrast. and donald trump is going to beat hillary clinton in large part because of that, a, and because of the economy, which they still trust donald trump on more than hillary clinton. >> david, sarah mentions the media issues. the fact is, you know, just looking at the numbers, four to five times more coverage of donald trump's remark on the second amendment than on hillary clinton's newly-released e-mails. that's factual. >> i don't like coming on as a guest on your network and beating up on the media. i think that you won't do a goo and other journalists do a good job. only losers complain about the media. if you're a winner, you put your

message out there and let's see who wins. i'm a democrat and i'm a progressive and i'm happy to come onto fox news and talk to you, and that's how it should be, we should exchange ideas and stop beating up on reporters, in my opinion. >> that would be fine if the reporters aren't working in your favor. the facts don't lie. >> we have to leave it there. sarah and david, we appreciate you both coming on, thank you for being here today. a fox news alert, we're awaiting donald trump at a meeting of evangelical christians and pastors, a key voteding bloc if he wants to lead the election. governor mike huckabee is next at the podium. given the choices that are left, our guest is an author and host, and author of "if you can keep it," all about religion us

liberty. both of these candidates are talking about religious liberty. it's something that i know you were part of the earlier meeting with evangelicals and trump. >> at that event i was asked to speak, and i was stunned, truly stunned and trump started talking about how pastors have felt kind of muzzled because of this 501(c)(3) tax status that if they say something political or even leaning toward the political, they fear they'll lose their tax exempt status. the fact that he picked up on that really shocked me. i thought, that's kind of amazing, i mean, we know he's smart, but that was really insightful. then he talked about how president johnson had brought about this amendment to make that happen. i had never heard of that. >> really? >> i never heard of that amendment in my life. i thought, this was fascinating, he's talking about something that i'm really interested in. i never thought it started in the '60s under johnson.

then trump said he wants to get rid of that. i think that's constitutionally correct and the right thing to do for america but i never heard anybody mention it except trump. he got high marks on the issue of religious liberty from me. >> hillary clinton wrote a piece this week in a utah paper and she said, she's on their side. she said, "i've been fighting to defend religious freedom for years. as secretary of state i made it a cornerstone of our policy to protect the rights of religious minorities around the world." >> that is a cynical joke. i'm stunned. the level of cynicism from hillary clinton to make a statement like that, it's ugly. i mean, we know she's corrupt. and cynical. i have to say, i think of her as really cynical. but to hear her talk about religious liberty, she is the enemy, if ever there was an enemy of religious liberty in america it's hillary rodham clinton. every american should be frightened to death on that issue. >> those are very strong words. what kinds of things are you worried about when it comes to

religious liberty? >> she has a very cavalier attitude toward people who have traditional faith, right? in america we always talk about respecting minorities. and that's correct. you don't let the majority overwhelm the minority. so if there are a group of people that have a different view of sexuality, it doesn't matter what that view is, you look at it and you say, we need to figure out a way to treat these people respectfully even if we disagree. now, it doesn't matter what side of that issue you're on. you have to respect both sides. hillary rodham clinton has made it her career goal, really, to work with progressives against those kind of people. she coined the term "freedom of worship" years ago. i thought, freedom of worship? she's talking about what you do in a building on a sunday morning. but freedom of religion is different. freedom of religion is what you do when you come out of that building. and obama and hillary clinton would have us bow to the secular authority of the state. that is the antithesis of what

our founders envisioned. >> we'll keep an eye on that, as you know. great book. if people need good reading, that's the one to read. thank you. the state department having a really hard time explaining those newly released e-mails of hillary clinton's top aide huma abedin. and much to the chagrin of frustrated reporters trying to get an answer. >> we feel confident in our ability and our past practice of reaching out to a variety of sources. >> i'm sorry, am i not speaking english? one mortgage-free year for you. it's the quicken loans hole in one sweepstakes and you could be the next winner. enter today at pgatour.com/quickenloans for your chance to win a year's worth of mortgage payments. craso come dive into disheser like the new alaska bairdi crab dinner with sweet crab from the icy waters of alaska. or try crab lover's dream with tender snow and king crab legs.

love crab? then hurry, crabfest ends soon. at safelite, we know how busy life can be. these kids were headed to their first dance recital... ...when their windshield got cracked... ...but they couldn't miss the show. so dad went to the new safelite-dot-com. and in just a few clicks, he scheduled a replacement... ...before the girls even took the stage. safelite-dot-com is the fast, easy way to schedule service anywhere in america! so you don't have to miss a thing. y'all did wonderful! that's another safelite advantage. (girls sing) safelite repair, safelite replace. is depression more than sadness? (girls sing) safelite repair, safelite replace. ♪ it's a tangle of multiple symptoms. ♪

♪ trintellix (vortioxetine) is a prescription medicine for depression. trintellix may start to untangle or help improve the multiple symptoms of depression. for me, trintellix made a difference. tell your healthcare professional right away if your depression worsens, or you have unusual changes in mood, behavior or thoughts of suicide. antidepressants can increase these in children, teens, and young adults. trintellix has not been studied in children. do not take with maois. tell your healthcare professional about your medications, including migraine, psychiatric and depression medications to avoid a potentially life-threatening condition. increased risk of bleeding or bruising may occur especially if taken with nsaid pain relievers, aspirin, or blood thinners. manic episodes or vision problems may occur in some people. may cause low sodium levels. the most common side effects are nausea, constipation and vomiting. trintellix did not have significant impact on weight. ask your healthcare professional if trintellix

could make a difference for you. ...be quicker than everybody. allyson felix needs to... to win at home, she needs to be quicker than... allyson: chloe! that's why allyson felix uses bounty. the quicker picker upper. allyson: chloe! allyson: chloe! bounty is faster and 2x more absorbent than the leading... ...ordinary brand, and faster than chloe too. allyson: come on chloe! bounty the quicker picker upper republican party leaders are threatening to cut off resources to donald trump if he doesn't shift the direction of his campaign. we'll talk to the journalist who broke the story. and what may be a record market day for the s&p and the dow. top of the hour, "shepard smith

reporting." we'll see you then. the state department finding itself between a rock and a hard place between the latest release of clinton e-mails. a spokeswoman reaped peatedly dg questions from a report about whether there was evidence of a pay for play scheme. >> reporter: can you tell us why the state department redacted that name and whether or not this person wound up getting a job or not? >> okay. well, i can't speak to specific cases. >> reporter: i need a little help understanding why this person's name cannot be shared. >> i can't speak to specific cases. >> reporter: would it be wrong to assume then that this is, you know, a case simply of nepotism or something like that? >> i can't speak to specific cases, justin. >> reporter: you don't feel like there was impropriety in the relationship between the clinton foundation and the state

department? >> we talked to a wide range of people at my level, at various levels. >> reporter: has the department looked into this and determined there was no impropriety? >> the department is regularly in touch with people across the whole spectrum. >> reporter: that's not the question. i'm sorry. am i not speaking english? the question is whether or not you have determined that there was nothing improper here. >> we feel confident that all the rules were followed. >> let's bring in greta van susteren, anchor of "on the record." great to see you, greta. >> that was absolutely disgraceful. her job is to be a spokesperson, saying such stupid stuff, i can't speak to that, i can't speak to that. that is her job, being a spokesperson. what happened to transparency? she said we talked to a wide range of people at my level. what in the world does that mean? this is her job. the state department is supposed to be transparent and give us information. why are we even paying for this >> greta, you and i are lawyers, we know there are multiple investigations and civil cases

pending as well. i've got to think that's a tough job. what can you answer? >> it's not a tough job. then don't go out there. or say, look, i've been instructed by the lawyers not to say it. but to say with that phone little business, i can't speak to that, i can't speak to that, or i tried to talk to a wide range of people, that provides no information. don't have a press conference. and while you're not having your press conference, why don't you put out a memo as to why you didn't get all these e-mails out to begin with. and what is the story about someone getting special consideration, not even getting a job, but it's bad enough when a person gets a job in what looks like a quid pro quo, but they send the person options so they could pick a job themself. otherwise everything looks fine. >> you have to defend in some way or at least try to. again, what we hear from the clinton campaign today and yesterday is sort of that, listen, these were conversations

that didn't involve the secretary directly and there was nothing untoward here, so move along. >> it may not have. but as long as they continue to hide and dodge and say stupid stuff like i can't speak to that, i can't speak to that, i talked to a wide range of people, and while they're not giving out all the e-mails, it would be unreasonable for people not to be suspicious. this was supposed to be the most transparent administration. it's like pulling teeth to get these e-mails out. this wasn't something they volunteered. they got stuck, judicial watch got it in a foia request. i don't feel the least bit sympathetic for them. it would be unreasonable not to be suspicious while they're hiding this stuff or at least failing to do their jobs. >> you know there are many other foia requests pending. they said, we can't get you everything you want. for more than a year or two. so even if mrs. clinton is elected president, they're saying that many of these e-mails won't come from another year or two into her administration. >> look, i mean, i don't know

what the magnitude of the search is. there are so many problems with this search and these e-mails. for instance, the e-mails that were deleted and the 33,000 deleted, they were deleted because lawyers went through them and just looked at the headings, didn't even read at the body of the e-mail, subject matter, and then they deleted them before they told anybody. they could have taken those e-mails that they thought were not subject to disclosure and put them in some locked safe so that we could have them later. but no, they quickly deleted them so we can't retrieve them. look, i know that this is a complicated business. but if you're going to continue to do suspicious things, don't be surprised when people are suspicious. >> greta, thank you so much, see you at 7:00 tonight. >> thanks. the late former mayor denied smoking crack, but now a video shows it, going public for the first time. ronald reagan won 49 states

in his rout of walter mondale. what was the one state that mondale won? the answer, next. i might actually know this one. real is touching a ray. amazing is moving like one. real is making new friends. amazing is getting this close. real is an animal rescue. amazing is over twenty-seven thousand of them. there's only one place where real and amazing live. book a seaworld vacation package and eat free. i'm terhe is.at golf. but i'd like to keep being terrible at golf for as long as i can. new patented ensure enlive has hmb plus 20 grams of protein to help rebuild muscle. for the strength and energy to do what you love. new ensure enlive.

always be you. at ally bank, no branches equals great rates. it's a fact. kind of like bill splitting equals nitpicking. but i only had a salad. it was a buffalo chicken salad. salad.

time now for the trivia question of the day. we asked what was the one state that ronald reagan lost in the 1984 elect landslide. the answer, minnesota, and several you've tweeted you. got it right. the only state to vote for a democratic candidate, walter mondale. donald trump now at the podium speaking to a group of religious leaders in florida. a so-called pastors and pews meeting in orlando. mr. trump looking to shore up support in that key swing state and wants help from the

evangelical community, a group which has been lukewarm to his campaign so far. we'll keep an eye on the speech. >> the tsa says agents confiscated a gun from parts made from a 3-d printer at the reno airport in nevada. the weapon was a replica and loaded with live ammunition. the passenger was offered the chance to check the gun but left it behind. the passenger was not arrested or cited. two videos public for the first time. appears to show late tornado mayor rob ford smoking crack, something he initially denied doing. trace gallagher is live with more. >> reporter: right up until the died of cancer, former toronto mayor rob ford denied the video of him smoking crack existed and he claimed he never saw it. well, it does exist and the reason it's being released is because the charges have been dropped against ford's former driver who was accused of trying to extort a gangster to get the

tape back. there are reports ford makes racist stations and a gay slur. maybe different ears hear different thing. it is replete with obscenities. >> i like to just [bleep] justin trudeau and shove my foot as far up his -- [bleep] -- nose hairs -- [bleep] such a [bleep]. >> while the crack smoking video rocked rob ford's time as toronto mayor and triggered canada's biggest political scandal. ford admitted smoking crack during a drunken stupor.

rob ford eventually dropped out of the mayor's race as we know but he did regain his old city council seat. he died of stomach cancer in mach at the each of 46. >> sad is probably the word. trace, thank you. a cat unlike any other you have seen. what makes this little guy so unique? check it out there.

meet that man them for-eared feline who just found a forever home. he was dropped at the western pennsylvania hugh maim society in july. his extra set of ears said to be a mutation from his parents. you're at the ballpark, you see a fly ball and you think, this could be my moment. that is what happened to this

guy. but instead of getting a sufficient knee -- souvenir he got a faceful of nachos and beer. happened at at pittsburgh -- padres game. >> it's noon on the west coast, 3:00 in warren, michigan, where hillary clinton has been attacking donald trump's economic plan, saying he is just trying to help him and his rich friends and donald trump talking about the economy today, saying it's time nor united -- for thed states government to take on more debt. he says he has good reason for it. the republican national committee's chairman, secret warning to donald trump. ahead what reince priebus reportedly told the billionaire candidate at best campaign, and donald trump giving his side of the story. know thin who -- anybody who pokes weed? a major decision by the