there is going for a swim in the backyard pool and on camera. video capturing the moment when the bears breaking to a pasadena swimming pool for a quick dip, then they head to a nearby dumpster for a little dumpster diving. only to be chased away by a brave little dog . martha: they were hungry after that swim, they had to go for a snack. greg: a life of leisure. that's going to do it for us. "happening now" begins right now. jenna: hurricane hermine roars to shore in florida bringing drenching rain, 84 mile an hour winds and widespread flooding. i'm jenna lee. they said it was going to be a hurricane be one it was a hurricane, i'm leland witt are in for jon scott. one man in north florida died when a tree fell on him and hundreds ofthousands are without power florida all the way to the carolinas and it will likely get worse . jenna: hermine moving through georgia. this is a live look at st. mary georgia acrossthe state line north of jacksonville . jenna: hermine made landfall

as a category one hurricane overnight, has since been downgraded to a tropical storm but heavy flooding reported in florida and georgia as the storm had stores the carolinas. the mayor of charleston south carolina telling residents to hunker down. this huge weather system expected to linger for days off the northeast coastline, tropical storm watches now posted as far north as new jersey. leland: jonathan sperry live from panama city florida, miles west of where those pictures were in georgia. this is the calm after the storm? p6 leland, it's amazing and it is deceptive because this is a very lopsided storm. a lot of the areas west of the eye look like this, absolutely beautiful and wet through the night relatively unscathed but then there are still warnings, red flies flying, warning people not

going to water because there's still the potential for dangerous currents and then east of the center of the storm, people are still having problems. take a look at this video from cedar key area this area , a barrier island on the northern gulf coast of florida, they experienced record storm surges, heavy rain and high winds, even though this area that is well east of the eye. also another area facing similar problems, tampa bay. a area and just to the south, arizona bradenton area still experiencing heavy rainfall and occasional gusts, even though these areas again are well east of the eye. shortly after hermine made landfall overnight, some of the worst weather made a direct hit on the state

capital of tallahassee. the city government reports more than 60,000 customers are without electricity. among those customers without power overnight, the campus florida state university and leyland, as you pointed out the storm now moving across south georgia. it is creating problems there. 55 mile an hour gusts were reported for the city of valdosta and georgia power reporting that 74,000 of its customers have lost electricity as a result of the high winds from the storm. back to you. leland: it could get worse if it turns into a northeaster in the mid-atlantic. jonathan sperry live in florida, thank you. jenna? jenna: trump set to visit detroit tomorrow while hillary clinton is off the campaign trail going into the labor day weekend and one of the latest four-way polls, mrs. clinton pulls a seven point lead over trump with support from third-party candidates jill stein, raising a little bit if you take a look at that. the wall street journal headline reads new facts of hillary clinton's email show blurred lines with foundation context quoting, a hillary clinton email shows how politics, diplomacy and

philanthropy will periodically converge during her tenure as secretary of state with top aides drawing on clinton foundation context to deal with crisis overseas. greg hall is editor for the wall street journal, nice to have you back on the program. let's pick up the story live in politics. the latest revealed there are members of the foundation that were looking for a diplomatic passport in order to accompany bill clinton to north korea. what is the dilemma or debate about this latest revelation? >> it's a continuing dialogue about how hillary clinton may have been more favorable to requests from the foundation and othersources that may have come to the secretary of state's office during her tenure . here you got someone from the foundation looking for a diplomatic passport, sort of a favor from the secretary of state. it's not unusual for someone working on behalf ofthe united states to be given

those passports but they usually would go towards the diplomat himself and not necessarily his staff . jenna: is this a hurricane that is sitting on the clinton campaign or has moved to a tropical storm is going to pass through for clearer days ahead? >> that's a great metaphor. this hurricane will keep over the hillary clinton campaign through november because there's more email revelations, foundation revelations. the fbi set to release documents as early as today so that all the horizon toward november. jenna: in the meantime donald trump going to detroit. one of the big issues in detroit is the economy. donald trump spent a lot of time this week talking about immigration and his son was on fox and friends and brings the immigration and economy topic together, let's go ahead and take a listen. >> my father wants to protect this country, it's very simple. he also wants to preserve the wages of the 20 million people who live in this

country and it's very sad, if you look at median income in this country it hasn't gone up in 15 years. it hasn't gone up and yet we have thousands of people coming across the southern border. it poses a security risk and my father wants to take care of the problem and the people who are in this country causing the problems, he wants to get them out. jenna: a little crossover, talking about immigration but then gets wages in there. how impactful is that argument? >> the important thing for the donald trump campaign is he's got to narrow that gap, bring more people into the tent so that outreach right now into the black community is an effort to do that. i'm not sure whether he had a gain or a loss over the immigration debate and his trip to mexico maybe was awash in the end but now find that in and say we are trying to help americans have better wages and better jobs, that changes at least they hope the dynamic about what this immigration and border concept from donald trump is all about. jenna: we have a jobs report today, it's lower than expected, about 150,000 new jobs and what do you think that means as we look forward to the next several months as

far as economic things and the federal raising rates, how will that affect the campaign? >> this is an interesting job report because we are seeing it may be too soon to provoke a fed change but on the other hand with the hillary clinton campaign is not also strong enough to necessarily have a fully embrace obama's economic legacy and we've seen her keep her distance so we saw donald trump, out pardon early today saying this shows how bad it is, under the obama clinton regime so this jobs report is playingright into that. we got a few more before we get there . >> you. jenna: you feel either candidate has presented a plan for the economy that is cohesive for the american people? >> there's a lot of discussion about that and hillary clinton as these clearly elucidated points, trump has more broad-based tragedies but the issue comes down to is the current policy working and if so, will it continue? there's a lot of people who feel that and will vote for

clinton and there's others that feel that the middle class, it's not working for me and i will change and they're going to vote for donald trump. jenna: great to have you on the program, thank you so much. we want to hear from you. polls showing that many americans aren't happy with both major party candidates. are you satisfied with the choices? what do you think? have you considered whether to vote in general? our live chat is up and running, go to foxnews.com/happeningnow to join the conversation. more on that a little later in the program . leland: looking forward to hear what you have to say. a rocket belonging to space x blue on launchpad in cape canaveral, raising new questions about private spaceflight. watch carefully, you can see the explosion originating near the upper oxygen tank and destroy the rocket as well as its cargo, a $200 million communications satellite that belonged to facebook. it happened during a routine fueling test of the falcon nine rocket ahead of a

planned saturday launch. this is the managing editor for space.com, nice to see you, which it was under better circumstances. >> thank for having me. leland: this isn't the first time that space x has had problems with things blowing up which in the space industry is a bad situation. >> this is actually space x's second major accident in the state for a couple years, last june in june 2015 a falcon nine rocket exploded during launch of a dragon capsule , that's one that space x built to carry cargo for nasa so it they did come back from that accident last year so this is kind of another setback for them to be on when you think about it, give us a historical perspective. there's so much controversy as it relates to the privatization of space. nasa contracts with space x as you pointed out so when nasa was originally designing with slide rulers the original rockets, the saturn, the apollo mission, mercury, gemini, did they have this

many accidents and explosions? >> it's surprising, in the early days when nasa was experimenting with his rockets leading to their first launch, they suffered many failures . space x in relation to that has seen relatively few. just these two in the space of nearly 30 launches now, i think about 27. they had to failures with these vehicles.now space x in the early days had a previous rockets, thefalcon one that they had a few failures with, they learned from those mistakes with this vehicle . leland: you are talking about money and some very good pictures, expected fireworks show but a hundred $95 million payload but no lives were lost. here, space x may have a contract from nasa to carry astronauts to the international space taken using one of those capsules that exploded. are we ready for that? are we ready to put astronauts lives into the hands of private contractors like this?

>> space x's ceo did say yesterday that had they had this dragon space capsule with, that the dragon would have been fine. they have an abort system they've been testing that can rip itself off the rocket in case of an emergency so he seems confident that safety system would have worked in the scenario and consequently he did say that would have happened during their last accident as well. space x isn't alone, nasa has a deal with boeing as well so companies are going to be looking at this and nasa as well to see what it might mean. leland: you look at the explosion, and you see who could survive that. i appreciate your time, thank you. jenna? jenna: as we get ready to mark 16 years since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, homeland security is warning law enforcement officers to be vigilant in the coming days. we tell you about that and also as donald trump gets his

second national's debriefing and prepare to reach out to african-americans in person. a significant exemption to the iran nuclear deal. we talk to the experts whose group claims they discovered a new loophole. it's not the first time the obama administration has had to defend itself against claims of a side deal. >> i know our critics are suggesting there's some kind of side deal going on. what i'm suggesting to you is that it's a critical part of the agreement. better buckle up. that inactive satellite radio of yours is ready to roll. because the siriusxm free listening event is on right now! just hit the sat button in your car and listen free thru sept 6.

that's right, two glorious weeks of commercial-free music, plus talk, sports, comedy, news, and more. your ride has never, ever, rocked like this. oh yeah, siriusxm is on for free right now. so tune in and let's ride! if you have moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, isn't it time to let the real you shine through? introducing otezla (apremilast). otezla is not an injection or a cream. it's a pill that treats plaque psoriasis differently. with otezla, 75% clearer skin is achievable after just 4 months, with reduced redness, thickness, and scaliness of plaques. and the otezla prescribing information has no requirement for routine lab monitoring. don't take otezla if you are allergic to any of its ingredients. otezla may increase the risk of depression. tell your doctor if you have a history of depression or suicidal thoughts, or if these feelings develop.

some people taking otezla reported weight loss. your doctor should monitor your weight and may stop treatment. side effects may include diarrhea, nausea, upper respiratory tract infection, and headache. tell your doctor about all the medicines you take, and if you're pregnant or planning to be. ask your dermatologist about otezla today. otezla. show more of you. how can you be so confident

these are good deals that adequately address concerns the us has about a brand? >> this does not represent some sort of side deal. there's been suggested by some republicans that there is some agreement that was cut off to the side. the fact is, this is critical part of the agreement and this deal cannot go forward until that information, that access has been provided to

the nuclear experts at the iaea. jenna: that josh is a year ago insisting there were no side deals on the nuclear agreement. the us and five other powers reached that landmark agreement last summer and it was implemented in january. now report idc think tank suggests there are some exemptions to the deal. that will impact its effectiveness. the man wholeads that group joins us now, david albright at the institute for science and international security. he's a physicist , one of the most respected arms-control experts in the country and serve as a weapons inspector in iraq and has testified before congress on a slew of nuclear issues, it's good to have back on program. >> nice to be here. jenna: you issued this report and it got a lot of attention because of your background. what did youfind, why is it significant? >> i think what we've been trying to do recently is shed light on kind of the , really are secret parts of this land deal and what we found in this case was that there were decisions by the ruling body

of this iran deal, the joint commission that had not been made public and that can affect the deal and we found there were exemptions on certain activities or materials that we didn't know about previously and felt that the public should know. we believe some members of congress were briefed on this provided to congress on this. but congress isn't in the best position to evaluate this highly technical information and we felt it was our duty to try to bring it forth as we learn about it . jenna: you mentioned the group, this joint commission that oversees the deal for lack of a better term. have you seen any work on this commission? >> i've had its decisions read to me. i was not able to obtain the actual decision documents but i had the language and that's what we put in the report was language from these decisions

and so on that's received a lot of attention is that there are certain, some of the well enriched uranium is not counted as part of the 300 kilograms which is one of the essential limitations in the iran deal and what was interesting yesterday, i feel a littlesorry for the state department spokesperson that is not a nuclear specialist , he's operating with talking points, it's kind of, trying to get a torturous response to our claim, he in essence confirmed it indirectly. >>. jenna: that interesting, it's very important and james rosen is just a phenomenal recording on your report yesterday and he had an interesting exchange with the spokesman for thestate department and i want to play the exchange in full, let's do that now . >> i don't want to place a message with you but i am concerned that i ask you a question of whether or not the joint commission has

enacted any exemptions for iran or anything that a reasonable observer would conclude to be an exemption and by way of answering, you talk about the loosening of commitments. so i wonder if you could address my question on its own terms. >> i'm not willing to talk about the specific work of the joint commission james, i'm not going to do that and i can't do that because by the agreement itself, is confidential. so i'm not going to get into that. i understand where you are going there. i'm not going to talk about that. but what i can assure you and everyone else is that there has been no loosening of iran's commitment and there have been no exceptions given that would allow them to exceed the limits, whether it's the limits of leu or the limits of heavy water that would allow them to have a usable amount of material in

excess of what they're supposed to have towards the production. jenna: what's your reaction to that? >> that's actually what we saw as indirect confirmation that there is an exemption on leu. jenna: what is that? >> i'm sorry, well enriched uranium, material that is further enriched to be usable to make weapons grade uranium so the statement is, the important part of statement is that there's no usable well enriched uranium. the chair that we said was exempted is in low-level waste and it's an argument whether it's usable or not. jenna: so the bottom line is, if it had been material for iran that could be material that could potentially be used build a nuclear weapon and if they had more than we thought, what would that mean?

>> if they have more low enriched uranium, then they could enrich that further if they decided to build nuclear weapons. it would be taking it, processing it, enriching it up to weapons grade uranium which is the level of enrichment you want to make a nuclear weapon so it would in a sense easily to obama so there's a lot of focus on how much well enriched uranium they had and it was a, the us fought hard to get it down to 300 kilograms of well enriched uranium so it's a critical number in this whole deal and so if there's exemptions to allow more, then the issue is, can that material be used for further enrichment? and our view is, we're not sure if we trust the joint commission's assessment if it's not usable. the d5 +1 do think they are flat-out wrong and we think

that kind of decision of whether it's usable or not should be subject to public scrutiny. jenna: hold on a second, i have to ask you why you think these exemptions were made in the first place.we're going to take a quick commercial break and be back with david albright after that. al insuranc.

jenna: david albright now in our report about exemptions being made regarding the iran nuclear deal. that begs the question david about why would this commission , which we are a part of, make any exceptions or exemptions for iran? >> well, i didn't find out the answer to that. i had some discussions with government officials tangentially on that. there's hot cells that are controlled by this deal.

hot cells can be used for minute making medical isotopes and also use to learn how to explore separating plutonium which can be used in nuclear weapons though there a major part of this deal . those hot cells in iran are limited in size and the deal is very clear about that. i think yesterday when the state department spokesperson about it, he spun around the condition but it's a condition that says karen can have hot cells over a certain size and was the joint commission says otherwise and what they did is they exempted several hot cells in iran and allowed iran to be large hot cells that exceed the limit. that to us is an exemption. why, i would imagine rent simply said no, were not going to give these up and confronted the five plus one with the condition that they don't exempt them then iran would not be in compliance with the iran deal or when the deal took effect last january so i think they were

literally just pressed to accept these. jenna: let me ask you a question in essence bottom lining it, do you believe based on what you've learned about these reported exemptions that iran is just as capable to racing toward the nuclear weapon even though the deal is in place? >> we can't judge at this point whether these exemptions allow them to race faster to the bomb. we don't know how much well enriched uranium was exempted for this well enriched reader uranium so we can't measure that. we'd like to find out and be able to make that kind of determination. what we worry about is if these exemptions are precedents and it iran, we know what's more hot cells that would exceed the limit of this iran deal and we know that they would like more well enriched uranium exempted and joint commission has no form a technical working group and one of the

agenda items is to consider whether more well enriched uranium should be exempted from this account of 300 kilograms of well enriched uranium. >> that's the basic question for a future segment. the redlines put in place by the those that pounded the dealbeing moved. are there things happening in the shadows that are impacting the effectiveness of this deal and that's a question we will continue to ask. it's great to have you on the program, thank you . >> thank you. leland: we are now marking 273 days since hillary clinton held a formal news conference and we are learning she will start traveling on the bigger plane that will now include the press corps covering her, whether they will get to ask questions or not we don't know. despite all that, the press conference has opened up mrs. clinton to harsh criticism from both donald trump and of course the media itself. let's talk about it with judy

miller, was surprised when an investigative reporter, author and fox news contributor and sweet, cargo sometimes bureau chief . ladies, nice to see you next morning. >> drawing on your considerable experience covering presidential politics, presidential campaign, has there ever been a presidential candidate of a major party so inaccessible as hillary clinton has been over the past couple of months # either of you, can anybody remember one? >> i can't remember one but i think in a way the charge that she hasn't been accessible to the press is not fair. david of npr did a count and found out based on numbers provided by the campaign that she had met with supporters more than 350 times since declaring her nomination. the problem is that a one on

one with a reporter or a sitdown interview is not the same as a freewheeling, free for all this conference which is what the press really wants to have and i'm not sure now that even if we are permitted to be on her plane that she would want to talk to us because as everyone knows, we are not her favorite people and despite her efforts to wage this new charm offensive, i'm not sure we're going to have any more access than we had in any other form except before she chooses. >> often on the campaign planes only wait to get access to the candidate is right onin orange and rolling down the island hope that somebody grabbed it and writes an answer back . then, do you think the reason we haven't seen this freewheeling press conferences because frankly, hillary clinton isn't that good at it? we remember her snarky remarks 272 days ago. >> i've seen hillary clinton since the 90s press conferences and some of them

back in, the famous one, they call it her pink suit press conference. he said press conferences when she was a senator. she dealt with the press all the time. when she was. she states she had press with her so it's not a matterof whether or not , i'm not here to preview what performance would be what she would be bombarded with a lot of questions about some of the controversies that have been, you've been talking about on fox for a long time so. >> we've been talking a lot about it, a lot of people talking about it. >> i would imagine that if the day came that she did take questions, it's very predictable that some of them may be and i don't think it's a matter of who would do that, it's a matter of, the bigger issue here is the campaign like the control messaging and as a reporter, i find that our job is to ask questions, not just the on

the receiving end as stenographers. that's why you need press conferences so you can ask away and get past talking points. leland: your job as a reporter is to break through that. the question judy though is that is the press pushing hard enough? obviously now it's 272 days. people are starting to ask questions what should the mainstream press have been pressing months ago about this? should we have been pressing around the time of the fbi issue skated by mister comey? should there have been more fire to this a lot earlier on? >> i think there's been a lot of scrutiny of mrs. clinton, no public figure i can think of as been subjected to the kind of scrutiny she's been subjected to but the fact that she continues to kind of mislead people or make false statements about emails, about the clinton foundation gives a steady drip drip of material to the press that has to be followed up on that

she doesn't want to deal with. of course she doesn't want to have a press conference, why would you want to talk about emails and then ghazi and the clinton foundation? leland: be right back after this, thanks for joining us, we will see you soon. >> you. >> iq. killing 99.99% of odor causing bacteria. for a cleaner, fresher, brighter denture every day. blue the dog here for propane. you know, i'm just a humble dog. i didn't attend the elite boarding kennels, but i do know that nothing beats the freedom of living out here with propane, people can live where they want, and just as cozy as they want. whether it's a hot bath (no thank you), a warm bedroom, or a perfectly grilled steak. drop it, drop it, drop it proudly independent. proudly american. proudly propane leland: right now the

department of homeland security warning law enforcement officers across the country to stay on high alert in the days leading up to september 11 which will mark 15 years the 9/11 attacks. these warnings say terrorists might try to pull off an attack around the anniversary. meanwhile, donald trump arriving moments ago at the fbi office in new york for his second classified security briefing as a presidential nominee. following what was a whirlwind trip to mexico and then a fiery immigration speech in arizona. now trump is set to visit an african-american church in detroit tomorrow. she legal correspondent charles cameron a few blocks away at trump towers with what this could mean. good morning carl. reporter: right now mister trump is expected to be wrapping up his fbi briefing, his national security briefing, second one he's had. he took the motorcade down from trump tower several hours ago and we expect him to be departing the fbi headquarters downtown from here. later this afternoon he will

be going to philadelphia to really begin again is african-american outreach, he has plans of meeting a roundtable discussion with business leaders, community leaders, all african-americans to discuss how he says he will make things better for african-americans area 's catchphrase has been what have you got to lose with some very dark pictures of what it means to be an african-american in the united states based on the time and lack of economic opportunity and tomorrow course he goes to detroit for what has been eight much typed african-american outreach with ben carson. he will go to the impact network which is the nation's only owned and operated african-american tv channel, evangelical christian tv where he will be interviewed by the bishop and he will address the congregation. ben carson will also give him a tour of the inner city of detroit, carson of course a former rival who is now a

trump supporter and grew up in detroit so he is by far focusing more and more on minority outreach. latinos, hispanics as well as african-americans. that's the focus both today and tomorrow. leland: carl cameron outside trump towers. more on the security briefing as it becomes available, thanks carl. jenna: a florida judge ruled witnesses in the trial of the terror suspects can testify in disguise. 24-year-old harland florez was arrested last july in key west after telling an undercover fbi agent he wanted to use a backpack bomb to target police. the case hinges on the testimony of two undercover fbi agents and in informant who don't want their identities revealed. so what impact will the judges decision have is a legal precedent? a federal prosecutor joined us and tom kennett, former prosecutor as well. greg, have you ever had a

witness testify in disguise? >> semi? no, i never have. it's an interesting issue. the judge has got to weigh the defendants right to confront and cross-examine witnesses and the jury's ability to assess the credibility of the witness against the government compelling interest to keep people safe undercover so they can continue to investigate . jenna: in the past cases the judge ruled as a light disguise, i'm curious what that means. have you ever seen this happen in court? >> it's certainly not unprecedented. you see this more often in the federal system because as greg can tell you, the former federal prosecutor, confidential informants are, you little bit but confidential informants are cooperating witnesses are the backbone of the criminal justice system, that's how they take down terror organizations and organized crime, narcotics so they will go to great lengths to protect the identity of these individuals either for their safety or because they are participating in either other

ongoing investigations.as a defense attorney you never learn their identity until the day of trial in what they call the 3500 material and if it's reallysensitive, what courts have allowed is sunglasses , maybe altering facial hair. jenna: there are partitions as well so you sit behind a partition and the question is, is this impacting the jury in a way that's not fair to the person on trial because the jury thinks well, this guy must be guilty because no one is in disguise and has more weight let's say to what you have to say. what about that? >> i don't do criminal defense work as i refuse to do the possible for the unappreciated which is what you end up doing but the point is this. if i was a criminal defense guy like tom and could keep my lunch down, what i would argue, you had it coming. what i would argue is because these people are testifying

under disguise that the implicit message to the jury is this guy is so dangerous, the defendant is so dangerous that the jury is now tainted and can't come to a reasonable conclusion and that's part of the problem but again, as you noted, witnesses have allowed to testify behind petitions area one key point here, one of the witnesses is in the fbi and once a confidential informant who is not a government employee. they're all a little bit different. i think the defense has a right to question these kind of nongovernment employees about what they are getting as opposed to fbi agents. jenna: i will take this one step further. do you think the judge allowing me this is to testify in disguise will impact the government's ability to prosecute an alleged terrorist? >> getting back to the government concerned, the concern of the defense is as fred was alluding to, is going to prejudice the jury

against your client because there's two issues, one you want the jurors to be able to evaluate the credibility of the witnesses, there i contact, their demeanor. that may be harder to do if they are wearing sunglasses or have bizarrefacial waves or hair or whatever the disguise is . the second issue is you know, you really want to make sure that the jury doesn't assume that because this witness had to come into court with a disguise, your client is so dangerous that a court sees a terrorist, you might be guilty. >>. jenna: it will be interesting to see, just curious what the disguises look like. your imagination runs wild. >> is not going to be a fragrant mask, okay? the judge is going to have to call it. jenna: they could do some great work for some of these victims, i've seen it done before including on myself. red, tom, great to have you both . i really appreciated, look forward to having you back. >> enjoy your weekend. leland: pneumatic studies link moderate drinking to

cancer, sending shockwaves through the alcohol industry and your local bar. good drinking become the new smoking?

this is todd hardy. a fitness buff, youth baseball coach-and lung cancer patient. the day i got the diagnosis, i was just shocked. the surgeon in dallas said i needed to have the top left lobe of my lung removed. i wanted to know what my other options were. and i found that at cancer treatment centers of america. at ctca, our experts examine a variety of therapies, treatments and technologies to identify a plan specifically for each patient. my doctor understood that who i am was just as important as what cancer i had. we talked about options. my doctor told me about a robotic surgery that was less invasive. we have excellent technology that allow us to perform very specialized procedures for patients who have lung disease. at ctca, it's all about what you can do. i feel fantastic now. exploring treatment options is at the heart of how we fight cancer.

the evolution of cancer care is here. learn more about our treatment options at cancercenter.com/lung. appointments available now. leland: new studies revealing

alcohol can cause cancer in even moderate drinkers after years of hearing about the health benefits of an occasional drink, especially red wine, these police are sending shockwaves through the alcohol industry and of course your local bar. here the business to take the same financial hit the tobacco industry took when smoking was caused to find lung cancer and heart disease among other things so is bringing the new smoking? here's a breakdown is doctor tiffany sizemore, board-certified cardiologist and doctor marty mchenry, cancer surgeon at johns hopkins university. offhand, either of you smoking and drinking are equally damaging to your health?

>> i wouldnot . >> only tangentially. leland: i'm glad we cleared that up, thank you very much. doctor mcgarry, first you. what's really going on here? how do you have all these studies drink with red wine, it lowers your blood pressure and has always antioxidants and now we hear it causes cancer. >> your everything. now it's good for you, now it's bad. turns out no one has ever suggested binge drinking is good. it's terrible for your heart, liver, pancreas and everything else but moderate use is controversial. we have medicaid medicine tend to study the impact on the heart separate from the liver and everything else and it turns out there's mixed use out there and some of the latest research has suggested it may not be good for general cancer types. we've known it causes had and neck cancers. we know it may contribute to colon cancer but no one

understood its general impact on cancer. turns out there are insulin receptors on cancer cells we are just to understand. the industryis trying to get ahead of this. they're worried about pr nightmare . leland: kurt, certainly the headline is a nightmare for any industry. do you think your product causes cancer? is there a point where we all have to say okay, we can holly vegetables all day and have no fun of any kind and lived to be 140 but might be miserable. his idea that there's a balance between whether or not you're going to have a drink of coca-colaor a snickers bar , any of those consequences? >> you hit the nail on the head, it's all about moderation. this is like telling a diabetic are never allowed to have a piece of cake. it has to be moderation. me as a cardiologist, if i tried to tell one of my cardiology patients that a mom of three kids that comes home after working all day to a dirty house, she can't have a glass of wine, i can kiss

my private practice goodbye. there's an element to moderation in this and we do no statistically and through research that moderate amounts of alcohol , which is one glass of wine or one alcoholic beverage for a woman or one or two for a man, we do know that decreases heart disease and we know heart disease is number one killer of men and women in the united states, not worldwidein the united states . so if we are talking about decreasing death and mortality, i'm all for a glass of wine a day. >> i don't think you'll get any argument for me on a glass of wine a day. it just depends on the size of the glass. leland: thank you guys. >> that support in the restaurant, not the one your house. leland: these are distinctions we will leave out. thank you.ácustomá thanks for having us. jenna: i'm glad we ended on that for the holiday weekend so we all have a little permission from the good doctor. we haven't seen him on the debate stage since the primaries and now we know who will be moderating when hillary clinton and donald trump face-off in the presidential debates. we get into that next.

♪ amazing sleep stays with you all day and all night. sleep number beds adjust on both sides for your best sleep ever. don't miss the biggest sale of the year. right now save 50% on the labor day limited edition bed, plus 36-month financing. hurry, ends monday! know better sleep. only at a sleep number store.

[ clock titime. ] you only have so much. that's why we want to make sure you won't have to wait on hold. and you won't have to guess when we'll turn up. because after all we should fit into your life. not the other way around. jenna: the commission on

presidential debate announcing who will moderate the upcoming one." when hillary clinton face-off in it to weeks and our senior political correspondent mike emanuel is in washington with the details. reporter: the details expected to attract audiences and the cochairs of the nonpartisan commission on presidential debates wants to allow large blocks of tame time on domestic and foreign topics. lester holt will moderate the first presidential debate on monday, september 26. that will be held at hofstra university in hempstead new york. elaine cano from eds will handle the vice presidential debate on tuesday, october 4 to buy longwood university in farmville virginia. the second presidential debate, town meeting will be

hosted by montserrat and cnn's anderson cooper. the setting will be washington university in st. louis on october 9. the third presidential debate will be moderated by our colleague chris wallace of fox news sunday, hosted by the university of nevada las vegas on wednesday, october 19 and it will be divided into six segments of about 15 minutes each and could lead to somememorable moments . >> could responded with a specific assertion about trump collections which you say some of it is made in mexico.>> this little guy has liedso much . >> there he goes about my record. >> he has lied. >> there he goes about my record. >> spokesman brian fallon says clinton is looking forward to participating in the debate", especially given that fox has been selected to

moderate thedebate for the first time ever, it is time for donald trump to end his debate shenanigans and formally agreed to debate . now we await reaction from mister trump, jenna? jenna: i have to point out that chris wallace is training on twitter right now. that's exciting. congratulations to chris and mike, thank you very much. in the next hour of "happening now" we talked to chris wallace about the state of the race, how do you get chosen? were going to get into it with chris. vegas, baby. leland? leland: that's a tough question. coming up on the next hour of "happening now", chris wallace will be here and a unique piece of real estate now foregrounds and this one, you might call it a long-term investment. like, eternity. it's a tomb. one of the oldest churches in america. how much will it cost? plus, watch what you say around your dog. researchers are planning our four-legged friends understand a lot more than we think and we want to hear from you, not what about what

your dog thinks polls show many americans are unhappy with both major party candidates so are you satisfied with your choices this year or do the presidential candidates have you considering whether to vote or not? our live chat is up and running at foxnews.com/happeningnow. she's combined income:hiest thirty million dollars. tours the world on private jets. protected by armed guards for thirty years. but she doesn't believe in your right to keep a gun at home for self-defense. "i fully appreciate how hard life is for so many americans today."

an out of touch hypocrite. she'd leave you defenseless. the nra political victory fund is responsible for the content of this advertising. . . . .

. . auto insurance program from the hartford? let's hear what actual customers are saying. [ hanson ] the hartford's integrity is something that's very important to us folks over 50. i get the highest levels of coverage. i get the highest levels of service, low premiums, but when it comes time to deliver, the hartford's been there. and that's what value's about for me. [ mccoy ] only the hartford offers lifetime renewability. it's their promise not to drop you even if you're in an accident. it's a great feeling to know that they're not gonna drop you for that reason. [ mccoy ] get the level of trust, value, and service experienced drivers like us deserve and see why customers rate the hartford 4.7 out of 5 stars for their claims experience. [ female announcer ] go to visithartfordauto.com today to learn more about

the aarp auto insurance program from the hartford and get a quote. that's visithartfordauto.com. >> he see you back here in an hour. "outnumbered" starts right now. melissa: begin with a fox news alert. tropical storm hermine is barreling up the east coast at this hour after making landfall early this morning. as the category one storm in florida's big bend area, packing winds up to 80 miles-an-hour and becoming the first hurricane to hit at that state in more than a decade. widespread flooding of a major concern with the storm surge, up to 12 feet in some areas and nearly two feet of rain on top of that. the powerful storm knocking down trees and damaging property, killing at least one person and leaving tens of thousands of in the dark. senior meet roll exist janice dean is live in the fox extre