i am watters and this is my world. >> tucker: we have a fox news alert, donald trump's muslim travel ban is blocked so-called for now. a temporary restraining order against the executive order blocking arrivals from seven countries. it really means that for now, the order cannot be enforced. fox news correspondent is life with more on the judge's decision, dan. what you know? >> tucker, this is important because it's a nationwide enforcement. an effort to block this enforcement of this trump executive order, we have seen other challenges but they are more narrowly tailored. this is across the country. judge james robards, given the

attorney general here in washington state a full victory by offering this temporary restraining order. arguing and citing that the state does have standings, it's being harmed by this executive order on immigration and it is likely the state, they would win on the merits of the case. here is the attorney general from washington, bob ferguson, reacting after the decision today. >> judge robards decision, effective immediately, effective now, puts a halt to president trump's unconstitutional and unlawful executive order. the law is a powerful thing. it holds everybody accountable to it. that includes the president of the united states. >> tucker: >> that stops the bae refugee program, the 90 day ban on people coming in from iran, iraq. from libya.

we do not know what the trump administration is going to do. donald trump did tweet today earlier that we must keep people out of our country, evil out of our country. the deferment of homeland security issued a "no" comment today but certainly, it is likely the trump administration will appeal. >> tucker: despite today's ruling, against the immigration orders, the aclu filed a class action lawsuit in the state of california, they claim it is of religious discrimination and does not have due process to foreign arrivals. we are joined with the international assistance party. michael, thank you for joining us. reading from the script, basically he was saying that it is unconstitutional because it does not provide due process to foreigners coming to this country. i do not know if you are a

lawyer or not. >> i am. >> tucker: are foreign nationals -- do they have due process under our constitution? >> under the constitution, when they are on our soil they do have rights. special immigrant visa holders for iraq you two are targeted by terrorist organizations because they work with the united state united states. one, their lives were at risk from terrorists because they stood with us, guys like me. i fought in iraq. and two, they went through about a two year vetting process. they got an airplanes and were detained, one guy was placed in handcuffs when he got to this country. we found out about this and we contacted a large number of lawyers, started to find out these were happening. these guys came to jfk, with some simple questions like can we see our clients, what is the law here, i got to tell you, my

heart goes out to the patrol guys that are trying to implement this order because the way the white house did this, they didn't know. we can find out what happened to these people so we filed fundamental rights as the government the changes, we want to find you and talked about who you are. >> tucker: and i've been detained by foreign governments twice. the bureaucracy is not something you want to get involved with in any country. i feel bad for the people you just described. we can carve out exemptions for them. but the larger question in the basis of your lawsuit is a meaningful one. for national ones, who are not on -- people in other countries have a right to our constitutional protection. does that mean that north korea can sueor anti-korean discrimination? what is the difference? why would a foreigner from a foreign country have a right to due process?

>> it's a legal process the united states government is there interacting with. especially when they get here. again, this is the difficult question to answer in part. we are talking about a broad category of people. it may or may not depending on who you listen to, what you web site you read from the government, visa holders, green card holders. >> you are right, that was not clear at first. there is no defense thematic -- >> tucker: this is not going to end now, it's going to continue, we need to figure out how we view this. you are the case that we need to let in these refugees, not just to repay them for helping us but for national security reasons. why would it help us from a national security perspective to let in refugees from these seven countries? >> we are in a fight. >> tucker: we are not just talk about refugees. >> ever wants to come here from seven different countries. 15,000 iraqi soldiers have given

their lives to fighting isis. to defeat the islamic state. i agree with that. the people who are right now, doing the house to house, nose to nose killer dive fight against the islamic state on the ground, if you have ever been in an urban gunfight, that is no joke. these are the ones were taking the flight. we just told them and their families they are not welcome in the united states. general betray us how do we sort this whole thing out? he has the executive power to do whatever. let's talk about the immediate consequences. >> tucker: i understand your point. we're also talking about yemen, somalia. i ran. countries that we are not directly involved in. >> that's a random list of countries.

>> tucker: the obama administration it deemed them dangerous. >> that is a total -- >> tucker: they get special consideration. i don't think there's anybody who disagrees. >> if you start walking down the accepted exception path, what about all the people who fought for us and with us? what about the kurdish fighters in syria. >> tucker: you are trying to stop the whole thing. >> the way this thing is written, when you go and send a couple political guys to a telephone booth, he did not talk to your director. retired marine general. it was apparently -- he found out about it on television. it is so poorly written, too overinclusive and underinclusive in the same time that we can talk about amending it but you are trying to -- >> tucker: you are being a little disingenuous.

that's not the entirety of the case that you are making. we have a moral obligation to bring in syrian refugees, that is something you said. it's not that i don't believe in it, no one has explained to me why that moral obligation comes from. >> tops it helps america. who are by the way celebrating this ban, openly. asus and the taliban of thrilled about this. >> tucker: your opinion is one among many. the idea that isis is going to act against us now that trump is issued an order. >> they already hate us. >> tucker: they don't seem to have a problem with that already. his >> yeah, they have a recruig problem. >> tucker: you think they're going to dislike us more because

of this. >> we will get get weaker if they get stronger. we just told the commander -- his kids are living in the u.s. right now because they are in danger. he is not allowed to come see his kids. you're going to ask this guy to carry the fight against our biggest enemy? you are a dad, i am a dad, you would not stand for that. >> tucker: governments do things like that all the time. again, this is why i'm accusing you of being disingenuous. why does the united states have a moral obligation to let people from somalia come here. you have not made an affirmative case for why that is good for our country. you're talking about iraq and the people who are fighting on our behalf. i do not know if i agree but it is not stupid. but somalia, yemen.

>> thank you so much. we are facing the largest refugee crisis in the world since world war ii. our eye allies are under strain europe. we have to step up in a crisis like that. it's very hard to lead in a crisis when you say you know what, we want everyone else to do the work. we will not fit in here. you are undermining american moralization here. >> tucker: that's not true. without inviting the people to come live in your country at public expense. >> we are talking about a tiny percentage of people. >> tucker: how many refugees? >> at what point will we have de our duty? >> duty is a very loaded word here. i would argue, a pretty large number of people. you would argue for fuel. given the current vetting process, we could probably do 200,000. >> tucker: per year? and you would do that to help those countries? here's the point, we could get

anyone in the world come here why would we not say let's figure out the people who will help america. >> i am not so sure anymore. we did not get the top talent in the world. >> tucker: are you arguing that 100,000 refugees would be to the economic benefit of the united states? what's the point? >> so you can feel good about yourself? >> in the face of the largest refugee crisis since the second world war, we have a leadership role to play. they are not total social burdens. henry kissinger came here. as a refugee. >> tucker: i'm just want to know what you're saying. are you saying it will assuage our guilt or help the u.s. economy? what is it about? >> at the very least, it is cost neutral. in the long run. >> tucker: how long will it

take? >> i have no idea. >> tucker: so it is a gas? i think the costs are high. they are high. you have to give a countervailing explanation for why we want to do this and no one ever does. other than it is ours role to lead. >> you are building up a straw man and bring it down. >> tucker: i'm not moralizing ae statue of liberty. we are fighting extremists in the middle east, isis has a simple message. you can live under our rule and fight with us against america, or we will kill you. what i'm saying is the united states can a third choic choice. which is stand with united states and it sounds a hell of a message. >> tucker: in exchange -- >> tucker: to say none of you can come here.

two of whom are the front lines in this fight. we just told everybody just standing with us, you know what? we will let you go kill and die, there are some tough conversations happening between friends of mine and the iraq he forces. >> tucker: because their expectations were to come here. >> no, come on. it is why don't you trust us enough to say -- why don't you believe any of us could potentially come here or visit your country on student visa or anything and oh by the way, why are you helping isis? my old division commander -- >> tucker: i'm sure he is. it is hard to say. >> they are saying why are you fighting the enemy -- why are

you helping the enemy we are fighting together? >> tucker: if this order, if you are successful in your lawsuit, isis recruiting will slow. >> i think some damage has been done but we can patch it up. >> thank you for joining us. we will continue to follow tonight's breaking news throughout the hour, wheel of updates, the future of the travel ban and more. the administration placed new orders on iran today. why it is in our national interest, exactly. you totanobody's hurt, new car. but there will still be pain. it comes when your insurance company says they'll only pay three-quarters of what it takes to replace it. what are you supposed to do? drive three-quarters of a car? now if you had liberty mutual new car replacement™, you'd get your whole car back. i guess they don't want you driving around on three wheels.

smart. with liberty mutual new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car. liberty stands with you™. liberty mutual insurance. my swthis scarf all thatsara. left to remem... what! she washed this like a month ago the long lasting scent of gain flings imy moderate to severeng crohn's disease. i didn't think there was anything else to talk about. but then i realized there was. so, i finally broke the silence with my doctor about what i was experiencing. he said humira is for people like me who have tried other medications but still experience the symptoms of moderate to severe crohn's disease. in clinical studies, the majority of patients on humira

saw significant symptom relief. and many achieved remission. humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. if you're still just managing your symptoms, talk with your gastroenterologist about humira. with humira, remission is possible.

>> tucker: the trump administration says today's new sanctions are just the first wave of penalties, if iran does not improve its behavior. this is a bad sign for the nuclear deal, the obama concluded it with -- two years ago. the new sanctions on iran, we are joined now from a congressman in long island. i'm just trying understand what that means. he of michael flynn, the president both saying the same thing. it's officially puts iran on notice. that sounds to me like a big step towards conflict. a red line over which if crossed we will fight. am i right? >> in our relationship toward iran is a re-posturing from a weakness position to a position of strength. we are starting to treat iran

like israel and israel like iran. america's foreign policy should be that we are treating our friends as our friends and our adversaries as our adversaries. they do not respect weakness, only strength. we cannot be silent not because we want more but because we want to prevent it. the kind of sum it all up, for iranian leadership, the party is over. >> tucker: what does that mean exactly? we are putting them on notice? how will we know when they have ignored the notice and what does that mean? what is our next step? >> we've seen a couple things over the course of the last few days. the statement that you referenced today, 25 individuals and entities having sanctions placed on them. additional options are available for us to get leverage, what were the sanctions for today, that was directed towards trying to slow down iran's ballistic

missile program, as well as resources that are going to the irg c. support from north korea, china, lebanon, there are a lot of entities connected to other countries. the sanctions arm making a step. let it be known to those individuals and entities, we are going to take those absence. big picture, the sanctions believe an operative $150 billion. we lost a lot of leverage. they are not begging us for relief where we can negotiate what we need to with all of iran's other productivities. this is just one step of what needs to be a multistep process. to get that leverage back on the table so we can start talking about all of the efforts to overthrow foreign governments, finance a sod and syria, the ballistic missile program. their efforts -- to wipe israel

off the map. this needs to be addressed. that was not part of the jc poa. >> tucker: i don't think anyone would support iran's behavior. it seems like a line in the sand and for those of us falling at home, what exactly will we know if iran has crossed it? if they conduct another missile test? >> it gives iran a lot to think about. there are consequences for their bad activities and that we will approach these conflicts from that position of strength. the military option should be on the table. that does not mean that we want to use it. that we have to use it. but there is no reason to just unilaterally take that off the table. quite frankly, we are the greatest nation in the world. we have the strongest military in the world. we have a much stronger economy

here in the united states than iran has over there. as the leaders of the free world, understanding their other countries that follow our lead in the way we handle iran, i think it's important for us to have all options on the table as far as how that redline looks, i think it is a smart move on the part of the trump administration, to just three pastor where we are from a position of weakness to strengt strength. over the course of the coming weeks, it gives us -- >> tucker: that's why this was confusing. two questions. to think that iran missile program threaten the mainland in the united states and what kind of support to think the public would have for a war with iran right now? >> there are some people who believe that the united states, its position as it relates to iran's development of intercontinental ballistic missiles is because the united states is sticking up for israel. these are intercontinental

ballistic missiles. these are not meant for israel. it like the united states. every time there is a ballistic missile attack -- >> tucker: there a physical threat to the united states. >> on their holidays, they chant death to america in their streets. >> tucker: but the missiles are a threat. >> absolutely. they pledged to wipe israel from the map. it's an opportunity for them to make technical corrections and to improve their hardware. it is not just a sign of aggression, it's much beyond that. this is none fine tuning their weapon system to be able to develop warheads. >> tucker: congressman, thanks a lot. lee. a federal judge temporarily halting the administration's travel ban. that applies nationwide. we have details on it next.

i didn't. one pill prevents the acid that causes heartburn, all day, all night. prevacid®24hr. i mwell, what are youe to take care odoing tomorrow -10am? staff meeting. noon? eating. 3:45? uh, compliance training. 6:30? sam's baseball practice. 8:30? tai chi. yeah, so sounds relaxing. alright, 9:53? i usually make their lunches then, and i have a little vegan so wow, you are busy. wouldn't it be great if you had investments that worked as hard as you do? yeah. introducing essential portfolios. the automated investing solution that lets you focus on your life.

(vo) do not go gentle into that good night, old age should burn and rave at close of day; rage, rage against the dying of the light. do not go gentle into that good night. ♪

♪ ♪ ♪ ...one of many pieces in my life. so when my asthma symptoms kept coming back on my long-term control medicine. i talked to my doctor and found a missing piece in my asthma treatment with breo. once-daily breo prevents asthma symptoms. breo is for adults with asthma not well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. breo won't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden breathing problems. breo is specifically designed to open up airways to improve breathing for a full 24 hours. breo contains a type of medicine that increases the risk of death from asthma problems and may increase the risk of hospitalization

in children and adolescents. breo is not for people whose asthma is well controlled on a long-term asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. once your asthma is well controlled, your doctor will decide if you can stop breo and prescribe a different asthma control medicine, like an inhaled corticosteroid. do not take breo more than prescribed. see your doctor if your asthma does not improve or gets worse. ask your doctor if 24-hour breo could be a missing piece for you. learn more about better breathing at mybreo.com. >> tucker: fox news alert, president trump's executive order blocking arrivals from seven muslim nations has been halted across the country by a federal judge in the state of washington, trace gallagher joins us now with the latest on that. what is this? >> the reason the case was in the court of federal judge james row guard is because he filed an executive order.

when judge robards put a nationwide halt, he said it was because he believes the washington state ag provided evidence that his order would do immediate harm, target muslims and violate the constitutional rights of immigrants and their families. washington governor tweeted... in a response, attorneys for the trump administration said washington state lacked standing to bring the challenge and the president has properly exercised his authority saying every president over the last 30 years has invoked this authority to suspend or impose restrictions on the entries of certain aliens or certain classes of aliens. in some instances, including classifications based on nationality. we've not yet heard from the white house but they expect the trump administration to abide by

the judges ruling and seek an emergency repeal of the ruling. it administration also by the way scored a victory today when a boston judge refused to extend a restraining order that blocked the president's temporary travel band. that judge was skeptical of claims that the president's orders represented religious discrimination. >> tucker: at least for now, the president's executive order on immigration will not be enforced. tammy bruce says it was a boost to the country's long-term safety and she joins us now from new york city. good to see you. why do you think the president's executive orders kept us safer? >> there is reason for the order in those nations. with failed nationstates and in two nationstates, they sponsor terror. sudan and iran. seven of them where there is no real infrastructure way to tell who we are allowing the country first of all, and then of course

you've got the nations that are consumed with civil war, with terrorism. terrorist groups have been the majority of the landmass, in addition, isis -- other areas in libya. they have what is called a fake passport industry. they have tens of thousands of blank passports in addition to state-based machinery to make identification papers. you have potentially thousands of individuals with fake materials, fake i.d. remember also, they have a state counterfeiting operation. not with just american cash, but also for identity papers. we are looking at a dynamic where until we can be absolutely sure about who does coming into this country, we have to presume. this is limited. we have some mechanism. this is the hot spot where there

is effectively a regional war leading to a world war and we have to have some parameters at this point. >> tucker: how confident are you that the federal government under this knows who's is coming in? there was a weird moment where dhs said this affects 100,000 visa holders, followed pretty swiftly by the state department moving the number down to 60,000. what you make of that? >> whether it's 50 or 100,000, i thought the news was great news. we have potentially 100,000 people from a region we don't even know who is there, that we've given visas to? that was a sign that this order was working. it had been almost like we had been handing them out like candy. there's no way you can have 60-100,000 visas. this is just for those seven countries. it's not worldwide. this .., those visas are technically canceled. but now there is this thing, the

order being stopped. a number of iranians fluent through boston, they were allowed in with visas that effectively had been canceled. >> tucker: interesting. what about the argument that is being made by a lot of people that this is in written fact of religious test. and therefore unconstitutional? >> here's what the left is doing. they are determined to make sure that the barack obama theory, that the liberal theory of open borders that everyone can come in here, because that's what they need to boost their power is the only answer. they have to make sure that trump fails and as a result, this nation fails because otherwise, they will be proven to be fraud. this obviously is not a religious test. it is seven nations, 85% of the muslims on the planet are not effective. that is -- all of these lawsuits

will ultimately fail but this is a test for the trump administration. this is about keeping our nation safe. we are in a world where we are almost preparing for war here. keeping the parameters around this country are key. these arguments from the left are fraught. of course, they are meant to have trump fail. they want the nation to fail. >> tucker: tammy bruce. thank you for that. we have the government of the state of government -- who just brought down the president's order, the governor of washington. thank you for joining us. what was the basis of the lawsuit? >> well, tonight, he federal judge appointed by president george w. bush found in effect there is a high probability of ultimate success that this is an even legal unconstitutional executive order. the claims that essentially the

judge found would have a likelihood of success. number one, this was a clearly religiously intolerant decision, contrary till your last speaker who apparently has not read the order -- it very specifically says that if one particular religion which is muslim, are supposed to go to the back of the bus and the end of the line, it is nationwide to use a limited number of refugee spots that are allowed into this country. this is absolutely forbidden by any fundamental notions of who we are as american. or the u.s. constitution. we have never, ever under any president, republican or democrat proposed some test of religion to enter this country. it is wrong. it will not stand. i'm proud to be of federal judge, who stood up to this

order. second, this essentially was not reasonable. it was not reasonable under the due process clause because liquid happened -- one of the things the judge asked, he asked the federal government today, how many muslim refugees from these seven countries who have caused a fatal terroristic attacks on september 11th? of the 700,000 people that have been admitted? it was zero. this was a violation in my view. i have not seen the order of the court yet. due process. >> tucker: due process and common sense or not the same thing, of course. i have read the orders. i do not remember the part where it says muslims have to go to the back of the bus. how is it a muslim man exactly? >> what it says exactly, what the order says is that religious

minorities will have priority in acceptance of the refugees. under this -- in these seven countries, we note with the religious majority is and we know who the religious minority is. majority is muslim, they were given a subordinate position in the priority for these highly sought after refugee status is. we have very limited number of refugee spots. giving them to non-muslims and head of muslims. this is a federal judge tonight, appointed by president george w. bush. don't talk about whiny liberals. >> tucker: you did not hear me say that for one thing. but the judges liberal an end you know that. >> apparently george w. bush thought he was okay. >> tucker: there is actually

lots of precedent for moving religious minorities and persecuted people to the front of the line. in our admit is in process. that goes back hundreds of years and you know that it i'm not know saying that there aren't problems. this band muslims or put some to the back of the bus, that's just not true. we've had plenty of administration say this is a persecuted group, let's bring them here first. >> i think what is unique in the situation, we've never had a president of the united states who entered this exalted office and said it was his clear intent to ban all muslims, he made it very profound that from this fourth, i donald trump will not have people go into this country. the ghost of rudy giuliani and asked if he could keep refugees

out. this was the worst plan, worthley executed thing. a two car funeral, the people that ran the thing. >> tucker: simply because of the obamacare -- it was chaotic. it was embarrassing. >> we have an agreement. >> tucker: you are saying this is a ban on muslims when you know that it is not. when you say things like that, you increase the level of fear and misinformation. >> this executive order contains an unconstitutional test of what religion is affected and how they are affected and differentiate in a clear intent by this president to not treat this part of the world with respect. it damages our national security. tucker, i am really sorry. i got 200 people waiting for me.

i appreciate you having me. thank you so much. >> tucker: thank you a lot. breaking tonight, a federal judge in seattle has blocked the travel ban, joining us now is michael wilde. he last worked for first lady melania trump when she first came to this country. he is also a critic of this order. >> just to codify, clarify, i clarified her immigration status. i worked for the trump administration over a decade. i'm here to talk about the order that happened less than an hour ago. >> tucker: there are many ways to criticize and support this. i get the one that annoys me the most, the least true, the claim that this is specifically -- legally excluding muslims. since you've read it, it says we give priority to the people of religious persecution. we did that for decades during

the cold war with jewish people in the soviet union. we are going to put you to the front of the line in coming to the united states. kristin's really are being singled out for persecution. >> a few statutory reasons, the 1952 immigration act allowed the president cysts suspend immigrn case of an emergency. they cannot actually discriminate based on national origin. the statutory argument. the constitutional argument, we believe historically equal protection does not allow itself to our shores. until it hits our shores. no entitlement to a visa. until you come to the united states. i disagree with it but that is the state of the law. there is a state's right which was supported just now in the temporary restraining order by a

federal judge in that jurisdiction that recognizes local schools have foreign students. there are a lot of people impacted and there is a fundamental right for individuals to travel and that was impeded. the trump lawyers just relied of our national history. the chinese exclusion act and the internment of the japanese. i believe in my heart the president is a patriot and he is trying to make us safe. but if you're going to see left a selectively choose seven countries. because i can't get back because their stock >> tucker: it must be deeply frustrating, i would nevr

defend the green card issue. but let's get back to something you said a second to go. he did not think that due process is guaranteed in the constitution to be just respect, restricted to american citizens? they should be able to sue the united states because they are barred entry? what is that? >> this is your show, i am honored to come back another time in debate that. i'm here to opine on the decision, let me answer your concern. lawyers -- you have no right to cancel at the airport. even though you made student to the united states, with her feet on the ground, there's no right to a lawyer at the border. he did not have constitutional protection. the federal judge believes in this instance they are going to sustain an argument in the long term and by the way, tucker, this is going to be -- it's going to stay, months to kind of work this out.

i hope congress comes up with another alternative. how impactful immigration is on our commerce, supremacy clause, all the wonderful things we teach students in law school. this is a federal matter. you know what? immigration has a great impact. this is an engine for our economy people care about it no now. >> tucker: you've said so many things. i just want to get back to the core question. which is committed to the residents of foreign countries, non-u.s. citizens, have a legal or moral claim on coming here or that entirely up to the discretion of the u.s. government and its citizens? i think most people would imagine the second is true. i think it's not a mainstream position. >> there is no entitlement to come to america. the statute itself has a presumption that everybody wants to live here and it is your burden when you come to our shores that you are actually going to lead. once a person is given a visa,

once they have ties that are very strong in the united states and once they have been afforded a visa and have other activities that have developed here, it's a different game. it's 2017, tucker. >> tucker: i know the year. doesn't that make us passive participants in this process? why don't we assert the right to say we want these people in our country, we think they will help our country, why is that an immemorial desire? >> the power of making laws is with our congress, not our president. venting of just seven countries when indonesia and saudi arabia, 11 million plus people there -- we are going to beat up on seven people? >> tucker: should be added saudi arabia to the list?

what is your point? i don't think it was a compound the police thought or executed plan. >> tucker: to think we should add saudi arabia? where should we just assumed that all countries pose an equal threat to us? can you draw those distinctions between us paying and saudi arabia? >> with a bacon those tired and huddled masses. we took in refugees in the 1700s. without losing our national character. >> that's not a serious point. i love immigration. we are all grandchildren of them. it is up to us. >> to be safe and to go forward and not discriminate, it is up to us.

>> tucker: the story is continuing to break and of course we will continue to cover it as it does. the famed right and it will join us to talk about sexual assault on campuses and is due process afforded on campus? justice in academia, ahead. y withevery late night...g... and moment away... with every click...call...punch... and paycheck... you've earned your medicare. it was a deal that was made long ago, and aarp believes it should be honored. thankfully, president trump does too. "i am going to protect and save your social security

and your medicare. you made a deal a long time ago." now, it's congress' turn. tell them to protect medicare. with advil, you'll ask what sinus headache? what stiff joints? what time of the month cramps? what nighttime pain? make all your pains a distant memory with advil the world's #1 choice what pain? advil. so beautiful. what shall we call you? tom! name it tom! studies show that toms have the highest average earning potential over their professional lifetime. see? uh, it's a girl. congratulations! two of my girls are toms. i work for ally, finances are my thing. you know, i'm gonna go give birth real quick and then we'll talk, ok? nice baby. let's go.

here comes tom #5! nothing, stops us from doing right by our customers. ally. do it right. whoo! look out. ally. do it right. by simply enjoying it. boost® simply complete. it's intelligent nutrition made with only 9 ingredients, plus 25 vitamins and minerals and 10 grams of protein. and look where life can take you! boost®. be up for it.™

>> tucker: a typical american college is like war-torn syria but with a library. maybe one in four women are sexually assaulted in campus. new programs for men to fix it. but where the people accused given due process? taylor is a writer, the attack on due process in american

universities. thank you for joining us. i have no doubt that sexual assault on campus is horrifying. but rape is the question and at what rate are people accused? >> sure, rape is terrible. the idea that one in five college women are -- they asked misleading questions, they do not ask the women were you raped or sexually assaulted? there've been several surveys on this, they would suggest one in 100 roughly our raped in their four years in college. if you add lesser sexual assaults, you are up in the two about one in 40, one in 50. it's not the escalating national

crisis of the obama administration pretended it was. >> tucker: in tandem with those claims, the idea that basically everyone accused of sexual misconduct was guilty. are they able to prove they were not guilty? is the justice system on campus anything you might expect? >> no, it is not at all. it is a kangaroo court, lots of people accused of rape or sexual assault on and off campus are not guilty. there are squadrons of bureaucrats who are encouraging women to say they were raped when what they really were were regretful afterwards. it's not one in five the kangaroo courts, the guys are almost presumed guilty, they are not allowed to prosecute their accusers, not allowed to see the evidence against them. they are put before impartial -- partial panels of feminist

ideologues all the time. it is outrageously unfair a number of people -- there about 100 plus that have sued. we've seen these cases. a lot of young men who are almost certainly innocent, you never know for sure, are being railroaded out of college because of these charges. >> tucker: it is one of the most serious of any possible crimes, rape. why would a campus be adjudicating that? why would not the police, who have a lot of police with this and enforce that? >> it should be left to the police. decades ago, the police were not very nice to real victims of rape. they cannot take it seriously, i want to police districts and heard them laughing about it. police got a bad rap. over time, they've gotten a whole lot better and more professional in handling these cases. but the feminist ideologues, the extreme ideologues -- man hating

ones, they don't get that. they developed this movement, well, the police will not presume the guilt and the campuses will so let's have the campus do that and then the obama administration ratcheted that up on april 4th 2011 by essentially ordering all of thee country to receive federal monday to have five new procedures, with an overhang of threatening to bad publicity and maybe take the money away, federal money from any college that can do exactly what the obama administration ordered it to do. even the ones who might like to be fair are not fair. >> tucker: it does not make sense though. if someone thought somebody committed sexual assault, i want that person in jail. >> it so twisted that the obama administration and colleges really discourage young women who say they were raped from going to the police.

colleges tend to save do not trust the police, they will not be nice to you. come to us. one thing that is blindingly clear about that is is not making the campuses any safer. if you really believe there is an epidemic of rape on campus, when you want to put those guys in prison. the college process cannot put them in prison. unless you take them to the cops, which usually the colleges discourage, they will go on to the next place and keep raping. >> tucker: i want people who commit sexual assault in jail. we will be right back. try doctor recommended gaviscon. it quickly neutralizes stomach acid and helps keep acid down for hours. relieve heartburn with fast- acting, long-lasting gaviscon.

and helps keep acid down for hours. what powers the digital world? communication. like centurylink's broadband network that gives 35,000 fans a cutting edge game experience. or the network that keeps a leading hotel chain's guests connected at work, and at play. or the it platform that powers millions of ecards every day for one of the largest greeting card companies. businesses count on communication, and communication counts on centurylink.

my mmade a simple trip toonic the grocery storesis anything but simple. so i had an important conversation with my dermatologist about humira. he explained that humira works inside my body to target and help block a specific source of inflammation that contributes to my symptoms. in clinical trials, most adults taking humira were clear or almost clear, and many saw 75% and even 90% clearance in just 4 months.

humira can lower your ability to fight infections, including tuberculosis. serious, sometimes fatal infections and cancers, including lymphoma, have happened; as have blood, liver, and nervous system problems, serious allergic reactions, and new or worsening heart failure. before treatment, get tested for tb. tell your doctor if you've been to areas where certain fungal infections are common, and if you've had tb, hepatitis b, are prone to infections, or have flu-like symptoms or sores. don't start humira if you have an infection. ask about humi the #1 prescribed biologic by dermatologists. clearer skin is possible. >> tucker: .is it for us on this busy night of breaking news. every night is this week. customs and border protection has instructed u.s. airlines they can now board travelers have been affected by that travel ban, how would the president respond?

he will when we know. have a great weekend, tuned into sean hannity, which follows thi this. >> tonight, today sanctions really represent a very, very strong stand against the actions in iran. >> sean: cracking down on iran over eight ballistic missiles test. plus... paris strikes -- terrorists strike paris again. dr. sebastian gorka is here with reaction. 11 re rested after another liberal anti-free-speech freak out on the campus of new york university. we are in houston, texas,