next. >> martha: breaking tonight, that trip administration taking a spike to the court and we are expecting a ruling on this, either allowing the president's immigration to go forward or perhaps triggering a historic showdown. it could end up in the u.s. supreme court. i am martha maccallum edit this 18 of the first 100, and it's another busy one. just within the last hour, the justice department challenging a federal judge who had put a hold on the president planted temporary ban on travel. judge will talk with us on whether it will hold up in court, and we will be joined by special assistant to the

president. we will talk about the priorities with its bedding issue and whether or not another one of president trump the biggest campaign promises, tax reform, should have come first. let's go to chief white house correspondent, john roberts, who joined us at the white house. >> it's 5:52 eastern time, they reinstate the fencing order to let the temporary restraining order that was placed on it by a seattle federal district judge district judge, james robart on friday night. in the 15 15 page briefing, it argues that the president has "express data to request authority to suspend victory of any class of aliens to protect the national interest." the van is expected to an orderly review of screening members to ensure adequate standards are placed. in other words, this is temporary. the brief also argues that the established case law has determined that states have no standing to bring in suits.

they state lacks authority to sue as a representative of its innocent to protect them from the operation of federal law. the white house and at the department of justice contended the district order was both incorrect and far too sweeping, insisting that it would actually take away the president's right to bar citizens from a country that the president was at war with. they also argue that third-party aliens have no constitutional right to enter the country, nor does the u.s. form any judicial review for deny visa. the white house is facing opponents to in its attempt to reinstate the ban. 16 states have joined the fight. major corporations apple, google, uber, and ebay are all against the president. elon musk who is actually on the president's business advisory board. it was clear from headquarters that is the nerve center for the fight against terrorism, that that part of the military is

with him. >> we need strong programs, so that people that love us and want to love our country and it will end up loving our country are allowed in. not people who want to destroy us and destroy our country. >> a lot of spontaneous cheers and applause there. there something perhaps you and the judge can true over here. the district judge in making his ruling from the countries in the executive order had ever been arrested. for an act of terrorism, or just arrested. that is blatantly false. the guy that ran into all those guys at the ohio state university was of refugee from somalia. there are plenty of others as well. the legal record is clear. the ninth circuit court of appeals has scheduled an hour of oracle arguments to take place tomorrow at 6:00.

the judge will know better if we get a ruling on this until wednesday at the earliest. >> martha: john, thank you very much. here is judge napolitano. what is going on here? >> wow, we had a federal district court judge in seattle second-guess the president on the wisdom and propriety of the president's executive order. that is actually not the judge of federal judges in our society. the law on which donald trump relies is crystal clear, a 1952 statute but says just as he read from the brief that the president of the united states have the authority to suspend any immigration of an individual or a group or a class of people for public health, public safety, or national security. it is not the president and the courts, is that the president and the congress, if the president alone. >> martha: those opposing them they are saying they are paying more attention to the 1965 law,

which the president can't discriminate immigrants based on race, nationality, or place of birth. >> correct. what the president can discriminate on the basis of geography if he makes a finding from a geographical area on more likely than not to contain people that harm us -- >> martha: which is private president obama used when he did it? >> a short period of time in order to put in place more vetting procedures where people will be identified and examined on an individual than on a group basis, which is basically what president trump said in the executive order. >> martha: tomorrow night, we will hear an hour of argument on this. when you expect we will get a decision? does it go to the supreme court? >> i think we will get a decision on wednesday because this is a court that is required to write its decisions. i think they know that the losing side is going to appeal to the supreme court. my view is that the president is so much in the right, the states are so much in the wrong, they

don't even have a standing to sue, meaning they can only sue if they been harmed, and they haven't. they are claiming the people in those states are harmed, and at the obligation of those a lemming harmed. if the justice department wins and the states of washington and minnesota appeal to the supreme court, i don't think the supreme court will hear it. if the states went and at the justice department appeals to the supreme court, i think the supreme court will hear it because a supreme court is interested in the orderly administration of governmental function, and this is profoundly disorderly for a single federal judge to stop the president from examining people with more care as they enter the country. >> martha: judge, thank you. or get more breaking news on this, we'll come back to you. good to see you tonight. boris epstein is a special assistant to the president. good evening to you. you've been hearing all of this back and forth. one of the questions in my mind in terms of white house strategy, here you are, you

might have something to go to the supreme court, which would probably spit on a 4-4 decision right now. did you have the people opposing this administration dragging their heels on george gorsuch because i don't want to put him in and lose the. >> martha, let's separate these two go points. the executive order is completely -- the oral arguments tomorrow are on the procedural matter. the matter is candace judge in seattle stay this executive order? what is going to happen is in the night circle one way or another -- if they decide against somehow which it should not, it will then go back to the district court. this is an emergency appeal with the ninth circuit to state the temporary restraining order. the bottom line here is the next step in no way to supreme court. the next step is to hear the full case on the merit.

just happen in the massachusetts district court, we are very confident that the white house administration will prevail. >> martha: you are saying that if this ends tomorrow in your favor. >> yes, absolutely. we will learn tomorrow. if, for some reason, it does not, it will end in the administration's favor on the mayor as it did in the massachusetts district court district court. >> martha: i want to play a sound bite from phil o'reilly's interview with president trump in regard to tax reform, here's what he said. >> 2017, can americans expect a tax cut? >> i think so, yes. before the end of the year, i would like to say yes. >> martha: that picked up the years of many people. they said wait a minute, we were promised tax reform early. the markets have been going great guns based on growth that is coming to they want of bottom companies because of tax cuts and all the stuff. now we are hearing that might happen in the spring that it wouldn't be voted on until the

fall. a lot of businesses out there wondering what that means for them. >> let's not take that one statement out of context. it's obvious that this president has worked very hard throughout the few weeks of his transition. he's made a statement that he is going to be working very hard to put in tax relief this year. >> martha: would that be retroactive to january of 2017? >> putting the information out there in terms of his specific on the tax group as president fully said, i making sure that america's are not hurting by the overarching and really two heavy taxes put in place by the democrats. it's simpler tax brackets for individuals and it will work corporate tax bracket. speetwo >> martha: a lot of people look at everything that's going on in the incredible easy 18 days, and i know you all see that as progress and you want to be firing on all cylinders, which i think a lot of people get, but you look at what's going on now and whether or not this betting issue can go up to

the supreme court. give judge gorsuch who very much want to get confirmed. they are doing too much at once. they need to focus on things like tax reform and not be getting themselves caught up in the courts on this extreme betting issue at this point. what do you say? >> the judge the folks in these countries have been arrested on extremism and potential terrorism in this country. that's obstruction from the left. instruction from the left is not allowing nominees for cabinet seats to be confirmed. i'm not confirming judge gorsuch is just that. he is a true judge in a perfect picked to be the next justice on the supreme court. it does not mean that this next president and our initiation will somehow -- we will continue going full speed ahead for the american people because that's why he was elected. >> martha: thank you very much. good to have you here tonight.

we will also go live to seattle a little bit later where dan springer is standing by with any new information that comes out about the judges in ninth circuit as they hear arguments on the travel restriction. president trump makes no remarks about vladimir putin that had the stunned sum on the left and on the right. we will have a former trump advisor and a former obama officials will go head-to-head on that. plus new drama over the republicans promised to do away with obamacare. the inside scoop will be from capitol hill when we come back. >> can americans in 2017 expect a new health care plan ruled out by the trump administration this by the trump administration this year?

did you know slow internet can actually hold your business back? say goodbye to slow downloads, slow backups, slow everything.

comcast business offers blazing fast and reliable internet that's over 6 times faster than slow internet from the phone company. say hello to internet speeds up to 250 mbps. and add phone and tv for only $34.90 more a month. call today. comcast business. built for business. >> martha: developing tonight, we are less than an hour away from a newsmaking sitdown between our own bill o'reilly and president trump the first part of this interview sent shock waves through washington when bill o'reilly asked the president about his relationship with russian president vladimir putin. >> do you respect putin? >> i do respect them. >> why? >> i respect a lot of people, but that doesn't mean i'm going to get a long with them. he is a leader of his country. i say it is better to get along with russia than not. if russia helps us in the fight

against isis, which is a major fight and islamic terrorism all over the world, major fight, that's a good thing. it will get along came? i have no idea. >> he is a killer though. putin is a killer. >> there are a lot of killers. do you think our country is so innocent? >> i don't know of any government leaders that are killers. >> well, take a look at what we have done. we've made a lot of mistakes. i've been against the war in iraq from the beginning. but a lot of people were killed. a lot of killers around, believe me. >> martha: that got a lot of attention today. joining me now former house chairman, and former trump national security advisor. in a fox news contributor. welcome to both of you. good to have you here tonight. pete, let me start with you on this. your reaction to that statement by president trump. >> well, i am actually kind of

surprised by the question or the commenting by bill o'reilly saying, putin is a killer. we know that, but america has done business with very bad people, for an extended period of time. when i was on the intelligence committee, i met with putin, i met with qaddafi, i met with assad. in some way, at least the last three, qaddafi, assad, and karima, helped us achieve our national security interests. under the obama administration, dealt with some very ugly groups and individuals, dealing with the muslim brotherhood of egypt to move our agenda for. >> martha: that's not what he said. he didn't say that. he didn't say we dealt with a lot of bad -- and that's what you have to do. we are not so innocent either. that's what got people upset. he was making an equivalency. >> he may have been referring to our relationship with these kind of individuals, the muslim brotherhood, the libyan islamic fighting group in libya.

the february 17 martyrs f libya. who knows who we armed in syria to overthrow assad? these are some very ugly groups, the groups in libya, there's a lot of indications of the groups we partnered with work with and they are to overthrow qaddafi are actually some of the same people who engaged with killing our ambassador and three other americans in benghazi. >> martha: would you agree with what he is saying? >> no, and i think there are two problems here with what donald trump said. first, he did draw an equivalency. if barack obama had said what donald trump say, i can only imagine the outrage that people like congressman and other republicans would've had. that is not american exceptionalism as i know it. he also dismissed putin's gross human rights violation. including killing activist, journalist. it really was an extraordinary statement. i don't think you can america working with the brotherhood in libya. >> martha: let's go back to

why he may have said it. i'm curious why this strategy it has on this. and whether or not, pete, they believe that russia could help us with isis. i also wonder because he made very negative comments about ironic if he is trying to drive a wedge between russia and a iran. to cozy up to them to some extent and to push and isolate iran. is that possible? >> it is very, very possible. president obama made some of the same type of statements where he said america has done -- hasn't always been right, we've made mistakes, and of those kind of things. and if you are exactly right. for donald trump, eliminating and minimizing the threat of isis is top on his priority list, and he recognizes with the growth of influence that russia has had in the middle east over the last number of years both in terms of their effectiveness in a syria and other places in the middle east, and the role that they play with iran, if we are going to address both of those

issues, somehow we have to see if there's a way that we can build a relationship with russia. >> martha: marie, is that what he is trying to do? if you try to isolate iran and get on the same side of russia when it comes to isis? >> i think that is giving his strategy a little more credit than is actually there. i have seen no organized strategic thinking coming out of this white house on the middle east, antelope, there are ways to work with russia that don't include talking down america, making a moral equivalency from putin and the united state and missing when putin kills political opponents. there are ways to do it that don't add up to what donald trump said. >> martha: we will leave it there. very interesting. thank you to you both. good to have you here tonight. coming up at 8:00 on "the o'reilly factor," next part of exclusive interview with donald trump. >> you know it was fascinating to watch it at the inauguration with barack obama. you gave a speech. but your speech excoriated him.

you basically took has a apart, and he is sitting 5 feet away from you. >> see, i am an honest person. the country has very deep-seated problems. we have to do something about it, and if you notice, when i finish my speech, i turned around, shook his hand -- >> absolutely. >> he was very gracious and smiling. >> i don't know if he was happy with that. >> he seemed to be. >> martha: more to come. full interview, 8:00 on "o'reilly factor" ." we're still learning more about what the night factor is going to do tomorrow with the restricting travel. plus no follow up next on the plan to repeal obamacare. how is that going in washington? we will have people way in the head. central command headquarters today my it was quite an event. he delivers a new promise on the war against isis.

>> we will defeat radically? radical islamic terrorism, and we will not allow it to take root in our country. we will not allow it.

>> martha: breaking tonight,

president trump has arrived back at the white house after his first visit to the tune of central command headquarters as commander-in-chief. when he was there, he met with personal at lunch to serve his members bowing to outfit the military with new and improved g the victory against isis. watch. >> we are up against and ended the me that celebrates death death. and totally worships destruction. you've seen that. isis is on a campaign of genocide, committing atrocities across the world. to these forces of death and destruction, america and its allies will defeat you. we will defeat them. >> martha: strong words from the president. jack keane is a fox news military analyst. in general, welcome. in terms of what changes in the fight against isis? >> first of all, it's just great to visit these two commands.

for our viewers to understand, these central command and special operations command, these are the two commands that have largely had the burden of fighting the 9/11 wards for the last 15, 16 years. they are the ones i have done all the fighting and it certainly all the dying. i know that they appreciate it very much the commander in chief coming here after being in office only two weeks. he has said that he wants a comprehensive strategy from his general officers. he's going to get it. it will come from central command. certainly, i know for a fact that they have been looking at options -- they knew they were become commander-in-chief but they had no idea. they knew they would have to present some options for change from what is currently being executed. i think we will see is what the president wants. he's been very clear. urgency, we will get this thing done, we will get it done click to my quick, and he is willing to get the resources on it.

i think that will be a change from what we've done in the pas past. >> martha: you touch on something that is so important and you heard the cheers in the room. they are feeling as if someone is listening to them, and that the mission they have been given long ago that in many ways that they have been stymied. you look at the fact that you had three secretaries of defense under president obama who left that position and criticized him, openly in books that they wrote saying he wasn't listening to the military and wasn't doing what needed to be done to defeat isis. this is a whole new ball game. is it not? >> absolutely. they know that. as a post of the troops that come an end spend two or three or four years with us, it was certainly welcome the sacrifice that they are making, but that career force has been back to iraq and afghanistan multiple times over the last 15 and 16 years. they watched us pull away from iraq and squander the victory that they had achieved.

we are now in a situation in afghanistan where the war is not winnable, and to please come as a result of policy decisions made by the previous demonstration, and these troops under steele that, clearly. >> martha: we go back and in bigger numbers, what does a time frame look on this? >> for afghanistan, that's different. when it comes to isis, they will put options on the table to increase the resources that we are providing to help beat the iraqis be successful. that probably will not require a lot of new troops on our part. for the war in syria, we do not have a ground force that is capable. they are going to have to put options on a table, arab coalition, regional forces, and possibly u.s. direct combat forces, or just increase what we are doing there. they are showing all those options and then let them see what our associate. martha, we have never done this

before. obama has never seen anything like that. >> martha: general kane, or to come on that. thank you very much sir, good c. >> take care, martha. >> martha: their questions on the white house's plans to appeal obamacare. next on reports of gop's effort may be in a bit of a trouble. plus, with process around the country, we are going live to seattle next for breaking news on what the court is now planning to do with president trump's travel restriction.

>> martha: breaking tonight, we have just learned that at this exact hour tomorrow night, a federal appeals court will hear arguments whether or not to reinstate president trump immigration executive order. dan springer gets a closer look to what is going on in seattle and what we can expect more. hi dan. >> hi, martha. things are moving quickly. about 90 minutes ago, the trump administration made its case

issuing in the legal brief. its argument to why this federal court judge in seattle, in their opinion, was way off base and allowing that temporary order late afternoon. the exclusion of aliens is also a fundamental act of sovereignt sovereignty, inherent in the executive power to control the foreign affairs of the nation. judge james robart seemed to side with the state of washington, which argued that president trump's extreme vetting order was motivated by religious discrimination, not desire to keep americans safe. at one point, he even incorrectly said that not a single person from the seven mostly muslim countries had been arrested on terrorism charges since 9/11. the associated press today fact-check and came up with at least two examples of refugees from iraq who were arrested in the u.s. while plotting attacks. now the issue goes to the ninth circuit court of appeals. a three-judge panel will hear arguments by phone tomorrow at 3:00 pacific time. they are spread out all over the

country. lawyers for each i will have 30 minutes apiece. two of the three judges were nominated by democrats. they are picked by president carter in 1980, michelle freedom was just selected by president obama. if the panel upholds the temporary restraining order, the trump administration will almost certainly appealed. it could try a larger 11 judge panel on the ninth circuit court or go straight to the supreme court where justice and for kennedy will issue estate or let the courts bolt weigh in. it would take five justices to over turn the appeals court if it's a 4-4 tie, and right now we have a 4-4 split with conservatives and liberals on the court. it's a 4-4 split, the lower court's decision will be upheld. >> martha: what is this mean for judge neil gorsuch? thank you very much, dan.

we are checking developing news tonight on obamacare and reports at the republican plans to repeal and replace may be running into a little bit of trouble. trace gallagher has more on that. a trace. >> there does seem to be a stalemate on the republican party. those want obamacare repealed immediately. g.o.p. congressman of ohio and mark meadows of mercury want to save the very same affordable care act repeal bill back in 2015 also passed the senate, but was vetoed by the president. it should be voted on again and sent it to president's desk asap. tennessee senator who chairs the health committee clearly feels a step-by-step approach, saying he would like to see lawmakers come up with sixes to the current insurance market before appealing parts of the walk, which is similar to the timeline president trump wait out during his interview with bill o'reilly. watch. >> in the process and it may will take too some time into

next year, but we are certainly going to be in the process. very complicated. obamacare is at the blaster. you have to remember, obamacare doesn't work. we are putting in a wonderful plan. it statutorily takes a while to get. >> even house speaker paul ryan believes obamacare is collapsing under its own weight and is currently crafting a bill that would unravel big chunks of it the health care law. he is getting pressure built to repeal legislation repeals back has replacement met measures. several have vowed not to allow millions of people to suddenly lose coverage. experts say the biggest problem with the affordable care act is that not enough young and healthy people signed up to offset the cost of older and sicker people. now the g.o.p. has to remedy that with a plan the whole party can apparently rally behind. martha. >> martha: thank you, trace.

former spokesman for the dnc, and a fox contributor, genital back welcome the republicans have said for years that they have plans to replace this and now it comes time to do it and they seem to be at odds. >> they have been cracking walnuts on the soccer since 2009. 2009. now they get down to go time and they are not ready to go. part of it is that whatever happened, everybody wants a distraction. the democrats felt the same way with president obama won trying to get the original put in. they're going to be disruptions. remember, all the people who lost their plans, the doctors, and all that stuff. there is inherent instruction in this. before they -- one to play the political cost. there is a political cost and tended to this with disappointing members of your base, dealing with frustrating people in the middle, when do you do and how?

until he gets on with that, they are not going to be able to settle on a plan. >> martha: meanwhile, the people its premiums skyrocket. we've a map that shows all of the states -- 39 of them have higher ones. businesses across the country believe that this will be alleviated for them to some extent. that really weighs into the business decisions that they make as well. >> i mean, chris is absolutely right. there is a political cost here. at the base of the republican party demands, they expect it, they want full repeal come hell or high water. it doesn't matter what else happens. there are a lot of members of congress who are feeling the pressure. the same time, there is a very real human cost. if they were to remove forward the repeal without a replacement, the nonpartisan offices are guessing tens of millions of people would lose their coverage and premiums with double from where they are now in a matter of years.

if they repeal without a replacement. chris is right. these guys have had seven years to work on this. they've had over 50 votes in the house to repeal it. how come they don't have their act together now? you would think that they would walk into office, this is the moment they have been waiting for, full control of the government, you think they would walk into office with the replacement plan ready to go. i think they are realizing. >> martha: there so my questions right now about priorities. the things that they are doing first as we talked about before tax reform. something that people really want to see. obamacare is something they thought they would have ready to roll, and you can't forget the people who don't like the situation as it is. a lot of people feel like they have got something better out of obamacare, but others want this monkey off their back and quickly. >> sure. there are only so many day ones. we've heard a lot about day one. on day one i will do this, on day one i will do that. on the proverbial day one, you can only do one thing at a time. the president wants to go directly to tax change, he want

to go to tax cuts, he wants to go to the trillion dollar infrastructure spending plan, he wants to juice the economy, he wants to do what other larger economies have done, and a poor gas on the fire to try and get the u.s. economy warning. he wants to do that. you can do that if you are doing obamacare for us, so it's a matter of choosing. congress can only process so much at a time. >> martha: so many would say that that this would gas on the fire in the economy. if you do with obamacare upfront and to give people relief on these premium hikes and figure out a way to have cross state environment where people can get -- choosing their pan in a better way, that that will be a good signal for business. >> ryan and trump are dancing. ryan is trying to encourage trump to choose, you have to choose. do you want to deal with obamacare or this first? not everything can go first. as you say, ryan perfectly happy going with obamacare first. if you want to do the taxes first, you can do that, but it's got to be one or another.

you can't do it all cook currently. >> martha: you very much. we have to leave it there. thank you very much. could one of the most controversial democrats in washington find her out of the job. a report that might surprise you under senator warren coming up next, at the super bowl story that you did not see on tv. when bill joins us to tell us what he saw at the big game when we come back. your insurance company won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says, "you picked the wrong insurance plan." no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car plus depreciation. liberty mutual insurance. safety doesn't come in a box. it's not a banner that goes on a wall.

it's not something you do now and then. or when it's convenient. it's using state-of-the-art simulators to better prepare for any situation. it's giving offshore teams onshore support. and it's empowering anyone to stop a job if something doesn't seem right. at bp, safety is never being satisfied. and always working to be better.

>> martha: >> it is up to us. it is up to the progressives. we need to make it very clear that we, as progresses, as democrats, as americans, stand a agendas. stand for real solutions in this crisis. stand for changes will make a difference in the lives of millions of people. we need to make clear that we will fight. >> martha: fight they will. that was democratic senator elizabeth warren, and now a new poll is suggesting that she might have a fight on her hands indeed. that's one of the most

controversial liberal centers in congress, a survey shows 46% of massachusetts voters believe that she should not be reelected. this is a woman that has often mentioned as a 2020 presidential candidate. what is she up against here? david will is a attorney. good to see you both tonight. you hear about putting people back to work, bold aggressive agenda, and you look at what we just saw happen in the november election. you have to wonder what she is talking about, david? >> miss warren is a far left senator who has been far more obsessed with denigrating and insulting our great president then she is serving as the needs of her constituents. remember that voters in massachusetts are a fickle bunch. in 2010, they put g.o.p. senator scott brown in office. they are office great sports fans, as we know from last night. tom brady winning his fifth super bowl, and he is a great

friend of mr. trump. warren's number one opponent may be next year curt schilling who is a former red sox great picture. that's going to be a big battle. she needs to look at what she is doing and focus more on her constituents than trying to tear down our new president. >> martha: the super bowl was a bout that time as well. >> i am not sure about the sports angle here, but i think what elizabeth warren is talking about it's critical to democrat success, not only her own but for us in 2020. this is something that joe biden's been out there talking about. bernie sanders as well. essentially, democrats have ignored the last few decades how hard it's been for the middle class, and that is why many white working-class voters went for donald trump in the selection. i salute her for -- >> martha: there is a divide it seems. the election process to head the dnc. you have a progressive side of that, and then you have the establishment side. joe biden and hillary clinton.

there in a real struggle right now. they had a very difficult election season in november. >> we did. i am still a little upset about it, obviously, but i am powering through. we are deeply divided. bernie sanders versus hillary clinton, that will go on for a long time. we need to find a unity message and a unity candidate. i'm just so that neither tom perez or keith ellison is that candidate. we might need to look further, maybe to the mayor of south bend, indiana, a veteran, someone i think it's very exciting for us. we also need to look at younger candidates, which i find it so interesting that that polling shows our top 32020 candidates are joe biden, bernie sanders, and elizabeth warren. >> if she doesn't win in 2018, she will be a realistic candidate for the democratic nominee. member something, hold on, remember what happened to bernie sanders, the far left candidate last year before he could be nominated, the dnc

cannibalized him. they destroyed him, they tore apart his campaign, he didn't even know about it, and she is cut from the same cloth as bernie. that is going to be a big problem for her as well. >> he did not lose the dnc because of what the g.o.p. did to them. >> martha: three words coming up, super bowl, bill hemmer, and next. >> tossed away. he did! patriots win the super bowl! brady has [vo] quickbooks introduces jeanette. and her new business: i do, to go. jeanette was excellent at marrying people. but had trouble getting paid. not a good time, jeanette. even worse. now i'm uncomfortable. but here's the good news, jeanette got quickbooks. send that invoice, jeanette. looks like they viewed it. and, ta-da! paid twice as fast.

oh, she's an efficient officiant. way to grow, jeanette. get paid twice as fast. visit quickbooks-dot-com. ... ... ...

>> there is not much going right for new england. out of the shotgun, ryan gets picked. paul is out. this is a fumble. new england hasn't. brady, end zone, touchdown!

danny amendola! it is broken up and the past is, no sign yet. comes out the people, and they are saying it is a catch. handoff, touchdown! james white! tossed to white. he did! at the patriots win super bowl! brady has his fifth! what they come back! >> thank you to all our fans. everyone back in boston, new england, we love you. you have been with us all year. we are bringing this home! >> tom brady! >> martha: you got to love it. we just want to relive the whole thing all over again for the patriots fans, and i'm sorry to the falcon fans.

president trump praised the patriots quarterback tom brady as they arrived back home where they brought that home. they are on the bus. the patriots come back last night from a 25-point deficit with a game for the ages. they started with a four game suspension, not just a memory. no doubt, the greatest quarterback to play the game. he's only missed one when we are in iowa last year. it was hard for him. my great friend bill hemmer. hi, bill. >> i just flew in from houston. as you said, i felt it. at halftime, fans were celebrating, they thought they had in the bank. the reason why i have been to a dozen super bowl is because it is the single greatest event that america does every year. at least that kicked off, everybody in that stadium is happy, and you just never know, martha, what is going to happen.

last night was absurd how that game ended up. no one could think that. >> martha: bill knows that my son and i have a divided family. my son and i are very big cats fans. he left to play ping-pong for about 5 minutes and because were so upset. what about the roger caddell moment? a little uncomfortable on the trophy stand. i saw him skipped on the backstairs like he is going on here. >> i think what you may not have been able to hear on tv rip the amount of boomers that were out for him. boston is not how i can. he was asked before the super bowl what happens if you have to hand the trophy to tom brady? he took it in stride. he said no problem. there was a handshake there. i thought it went pretty well. the amazing thing is, you think about this, you are down 28-12. i brought my niece, she is a schoolteacher in houston, texas. we started making our way for the exit around 8 minutes left.

we couldn't get out the door because something kept changing over and over. here's what i want you to think about. the final 8 minutes of regulation, every thing possible that you would like to get, they got. including the coin toss going into overtime. you can't draw that stuff up. >> martha: i do a quote of the night every night. i don't know if you want the show. here it is. tom brady says, "you want to know which ring is my favorite, the next one, bill." the next one is always his favorite. >> i just to say one more thing. the falcons were really impressive. i think they got worn down by the game or the moment, but they've got a really good chance of getting back there next year. >> martha: great catch by julian edelman. bill, great to see you. thank you for watching everybody. i'm martha maccallum, we will see you back here at 7:00 a.m. tomorrow night we will have big news from the west coast on the

travel ban decision for the trump administration. thanks for joining us. have a great night everybody. bill o'reilly coming up with the trump interview right after thi this ♪ >> tom: welcome to "red eye," hello everyone, my name is tom ♪ shillue. let's check in with t tvs andy levy at the "red eye" tease deck. >> andy: coming up on the big show, and social media stop comparing the super bowl to the election? president trumps travel ban is put on hold by a federal judge. and finally, a peek inside the secret world of kids, using emojis as encoded messages. stay tuned is our flower using frog of a