get out your weapon of choice. i like this one. get ready. >> neil: you bring a lot of extra stuff. we appreciate that. that's what makes you who you are. a patriots fan. see you tomorrow. >> hello, everyone. i am eric bolling along with kimberly guilfoyle, bob beckel, dana perino, greg gutfeld. this is "the five" ." the fate of president trump's temporary travel ban is still in question as a liberal ninth circuit court of appeals takes another day to decide whether to uphold the ruling or strike it down. the court announced there will be no decision today. the president still staunchly defending the need for his executive order. >> it was done for the security of our nation, the security of our citizens. so that people come in who aren't going to do us harm. a bad high school student would

understand this. anybody would understand this. right now, we are at risk because of what happened. >> eric: one of the issues that came up yesterday was whether they should consider statements made about president trump about muslims on the campaign trail. >> we are not saying the case shouldn't proceed but it's extraordinary for a court to enjoin the president's national security determination based on some newspaper articles. that's what has happened here. do you deny that the statements attributed to then-candidate trump and his political advisors and most recently mr. giuliani, do you deny those statements were made? >> judge, no. i would note that judge robart himself said that he wasn't going to look at campaign statements. >> eric: president trump thinks the courts need to stop playing politics.

>> i don't want to call that biased, so i won't. we haven't had to decision yet, but courts seem to be so political. and it would be so great for our justice system if they would be able to read a statement and do what's right. that has to do with the security of our country which is so important. >> eric: we will do politics and a second bite hearing the back and forth between the department of justice lawyer and the appellate court judges, any indication on what they may be thinking? >> kimberly: i agree with many of the legal experts. i said this last night on o'reilly that this line of questioning was inappropriate. they are supposed to examine the executive order. they were bringing up inappropriate lines of questioning by saying things like well, rudy giuliani called at this. and president trump said this. irrelevant. it is whether or not he in fact had the ability and the

authority to protect national security and issue this executive order, and he in fact does. whether they decide to legislate from the bench as a whole other matter but this this is the nih circuit court of appeals. they are well known for being quite liberal. 2 out of 3 are liberal justices and there is one that would be termed more of a moderate, conservative. if this comes down to a 2-1 decision, but it shouldn't, because he has the authority. that is stated in the document. >> eric: section 212, u.s. code 1182. the entry of a knee aliens or any class of aliens into the united states would be detrimental to the interests of the united states, the president a my proclamation suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants or impose restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. dana, the law seems clear, yet we may get an apostolic court --

appellate court that says no. >> dana: we are used to get having -- getting everything. this decision is not going to be that quick. this is not even on the merits of the executive order itself. this is the question of whether there can be a temporary restraining order. you haven't even gone to a question of the original lawsuit filed by the state of washington. that was on the merits. this was on the temporary restraining order. if ruled against the government, they could find another path. i do think -- i wouldn't bring up the candidates statements but i do think that within the same weekend when you have mayor giuliani saying that he was asked to put together a muslim ban that i think that is admissible. i don't think there's anything wrong with him bring it up. >> kimberly: absolutely not allowed to be brought up. it has no bearing whatsoever what rudy giuliani or joe blow down the street said about it. it has no bearing on age.

whether the president has the authority to protect the country as a matter of national security says the president shall deem -- >> dana: i'm not disagreeing that he doesn't have that authority. i don't know what the ruling would be but let's say they want to use it. there's a a reason that on the question of popularity of the executive order, it is being split because of partisanship that's unnecessary. the executive order is fairly narrow in scope but you can get that point because you are talking about statements that were made on the record by someone who said they were advising the president. >> eric: do a little politics with me, greg. if the appellate court says no, i'm sorry, donald trump, we are going to uphold the stay. what if it goes to a 4-4 supreme court. >> greg: it's going to be crazy. could win on the merits 8-0. i believe that.

>> greg: let's talk about the fact that giuliani said muslim ban. we are dealing with the most liberal judges. paula abdul. these are the people who actually said this band is harmful to citizens. they believed that. that's the opposite of common sense. the vetting has no imposition -- imposes no problems on the citizens. it's garbage. where does the reaction come from? these liberal judges are educated on liberal campuses who now equate national security to oppression. the idea of protecting your family is somehow xenophobic and mean-spirited. but you think maybe you should have borders and maybe you should vet terrorists. in many of these judges minds, just another country's freedom fighter. that we are at fault. i think this is where that comes from, liberal academia.

>> eric: this is the ninth circuit. tenth, 11th? >> kimberly: this is the ninth circuit in san francisco. >> eric: this one circuit, one area is dictating what the rest of the policy should be for the rest of the country. meanwhile there is one in the northeast that says his temporary travel ban is okay and constitutional. >> bob: donald trump is about to find out that the three branches of government and his signature does not automatically make policy or make bad law. the fact of the matter is, i keep coming back to this, the last time yemen had anything to do with terrorism in this country's 1975. if you want to be serious about this, then ban people from saudi arabia and pakistan. >> eric: that's why it's not a muslim ban. >> kimberly: why are you talking about yemen? they are failed states. >> bob: wait a second.

the people who sponsor this and pay for it are the saudi's and the people who train are the pakistanis. those two countries alone are so much more important than these other ones. this is low-hanging fruit. >> dana: the difference and that the paperwork and the passport details come all of that stuff, you can work with the saudi government and the pakistani government and others on those things. if you have a failed state like in somalia or yemen or sudan, i think it makes sense to put those countries on. >> kimberly: she's right, and that's what general kelly said. iraq is on the list. >> eric: the obama administration first pointed it out. if you're going to point a finger on someone having a quote-unquote muslim ban, look at the obama administration. >> bob: they didn't put a temporary ban on anybody from

those countries for the other thing is, what they are talking about -- i understand that they are training in those countries but i still contend that 90% of the training comes from pakistan, and we don't want to lose pakistan as an ally in that part of the world. >> dana: the united states government can work with a functioning pakistani government. we have that kind of cooperation. >> bob: we will run the government in iraq. >> greg: doesn't it bother you that the idea of fighting isis is being conflated with fighting muslims? >> bob: isis was the first group to come out and say they were so happy about the ban and they -- >> kimberly: they say that about everything. >> eric: can we do this? let's listen to both sides arguing the case. here is the justice department's attorney. >> in 2015 and 2016, both congress and the administration

made determinations that these seven countries posed the greatest risk of terrorism. the president determined there was a real risk. that is why the president determined that the best course was a temporary -- it's a short halt in entry for 90 days while these procedures are looked at. that's understandable. the president comes into office with an obligation to protect the national security of our country. >> eric: and the lawyer from the other side from washington state. >> in fact, it was the executive order itself that caused irreparable harm to our states, our residents. we believe the federal government has shown no irreparable harm from reinstating the status quo prior to the executive order. >> no harm to the state of washington? >> we had students and faculties our state universities were stranded overseas. we had families that were

separated. we we had longtime residents who could not travel overseas to visit their families without knowing they would be able to come back. we had lost tax revenue. >> eric: greg, delays. >> greg: he is exaggerating that. how is a safe travel pause not the sensible assessment? europe wishes it had done this. germany wishes it had done this. how is this an imposition on society? it's pure common sense. no wonder these liberal judges don't understand it. >> bob: this is driving me crazy. at the vetting process to get in here are so strict. >> greg: i understand. >> bob: all trump is doing is trying to fulfill a pledging mated supporters. he has no idea, none. they sat there and picked out these countries. >> kimberly: baba, you have no proof to substantiate the

statements are making. in fact, the president of the united states is privy to the presidential briefings and all the information coming in from the intelligence agencies. and he also met with president obama and had multiple conversations. he is basing that on a set of facts and intelligence reports he's privy to, and he has an obligation is the commander-in-chief to protect national security interests of the united states. the countries that are referred to our failed states that have improper, inadequate vetting in place. >> bob: not one of them -- >> eric: you are conflating two issues. you talk about the vetting of a refugee program versus what trump has said that we need to take a look at what, the message we allow people to come into the country via visa, passport, whatever reason. to close any loopholes that a terrorist, as isis has promise, that might be able to use. you are talking about a two year

vetting process with the refugee program. this wasn't that. >> bob: 90 day stay. the idea is it's based on some holes in the process is ridiculous. >> eric: how many holes do you need for one terrorist to get through? >> greg: we have a list that we've gone over all day on fox news. >> dana: might my final thought would be. i believe on the merits of president trump will be successful if and when it gets to the supreme court. >> eric: we will leave it there. drama on the senate floor after desperate democrats try to derail president trump's cabinet nominations. this time, attorney general jeff sessions gets the full democratic treatment by senator elizabeth warren and she gets reprimanded, and it was one for the ages. >> i appeal the ruling.

>> the senator will take her seat. >> eric: senator elizabeth warren got rebuked and silenced, and now the vote is about to be held for jeff sessions any minutes. we will right back with that. people just can't get enough of me and my discounts. so this year, they're getting a whole lot more. box 365, the calendar. everyone knows my paperless, safe driver, and multi-car discounts, but they're about to see a whole new side of me. heck, i can get you over $600 in savings. chop, chop. do i look like i've been hurt before? because i've been hurt before. um, actually your session is up. hang on. i call this next one "junior year abroad."

♪

>> dana: welcome back. we are waiting for another vote on one of president trump's cabinet nominees. jeff sessions for attorney general. last night, the senate cleared the way for the vote to move forward after democrat stage another bid to derail the nomination. >> ps, i believe, a disgrace to the justice department. those were the words of senator ted kennedy. coretta scott king also wrote to the committee, a person who has exhibited so much hostility to the enforcement of those laws. >> the senator is reminded it's a violation of rule 19. >> mr. president, i don't think i quite understand. i am reading a letter from coretta scott king. >> you stated that a sitting senator is a disgrace to the department of justice. >> dana: the senate majority leader pulled a rare move to

silence elizabeth warren. >> mr. president. >> majority leader. >> the motives and conduct of our colleague. >> mr. president, i am surprised that the words of coretta scott king are not suitable for debate in the united states senate. i asked leave of the senate to continue my remarks. >> is their objections? >> i object. >> i appeal the ruling. >> it is heard. >> the senator will take her seat. >> dana: she got filed by rule 19. >> greg: rule 19. also delicious cereal. what's hilarious is that she said something wrong that was refuted. then she plays the victim card after she impugned sessions. she is like someone who goes on twitter and trolls you and then you nail her and then she's like she blocks you. she freaks out. i don't think i would have

silenced her because then you fall for it and then she becomes the victim by silencing her, you give her what she wants. i think a smarter thing for the republicans should have been to say, why are you exploiting the memory of coretta scott king and using her for the purpose that was never intended for the sake of a fundraising stunt? we love how you bring up ted kennedy. he was so great for women. he drowned them with his affections. >> kimberly: somebody call legal. >> dana: he did raise a lot of money today. fundraising extravaganza. >> bob: you know who doesn't like what she said last night? a lot of democrats. i will tell you why. they know sessions is going to get in. it's clear it's going to happen. i don't think he should. i agree. i think he is a disgrace. that's not the point. the point is he's going to get in. >> eric: why is he a disgrace?

>> bob: he is a racist -- >> greg: prove it! >> bob: he got beaten in the senate for federal judgeship. >> greg: because people like you were calling him a racist. >> eric: it's not true. >> bob: the report here is that the democratic base is running from the democrats and they want them to oppose anything that trump does, and you've got to pick your shots. elizabeth warren doing this, knowing full well this guy was going to get through, save it for the guy was going to get beaten. i guarantee you the labor secretary, the guy who's got an undocumented person working for him, also beat up his wife. >> kimberly: bob, bob. you can't fling it and throw this crazy stuff out there. you have to have proof of this. you can't just be sitting there saying this. >> bob: for four years, i sat here and listened to swings about barack obama.

>> kimberly: nothing, nothing. >> bob: that was in "the new york times." you don't believe that, i guess. >> dana: let's get eric and kimberly in here. >> eric: i'm trying to figure out what is playing out here. mitch mcconnell doesn't do anything that he hasn't thought out. a lot of people are saying i can't believe he did that. now the right has handed elizabeth warren her first political ad of 2020. i think this was planned out. this is a long game, that the trump administration maybe has said with mcconnell, she's the most beatable of the candidate so far. put her forward. she is raising money like crazy right now. >> dana: she will be the poster child. >> eric: it's not cory booker anymore and no one is talking about schumer, pelosi. they are all talking about elizabeth warren.

>> dana: trying to figure how they can outdo her. >> bob: he will be impeached before that anyway. >> kimberly: this was a pivotal moment. she is trying to continue her push forward. she has poll numbers that are slipping. she's able to raise the money, stay relevant, the numbers are showing 44% think of registered voters think she should be reelected again. she is vulnerable and they are going to target her. this is a way for her to stay in the race. >> dana: the new senator from california, kamala harris. one of her tweets last night, i am measuring my tweet. she is a brand-new senator. she had 40,000 retweets in support of senator warren.

she is up and coming. >> eric: they may be playing into it. >> dana: i think they. remember my new year's prediction? >> eric: mitch mcconnell made a mistake? he doesn't make those mistakes. >> dana: do you remember my new year's prediction who was going to challenge donald trump? >> kimberly: al franken. >> dana: you saw over the weekend a little maneuvering. president trump told a group of police chiefs is going to help them fight crime and he asked for help to curb a illegal immigration. that is next on's "the five" ."

bp engineers use underwater robots, so they can keep watch over operations below the sea, even from thousands of feet above. because safety is never being satisfied. and always working to be better. because safety is yeahashtag "stuffy nose."old. hashtag "no sleep." i got it. hashtag "mouthbreather." yep. we've got a mouthbreather. well, just put on a breathe right strip and ... pow! it instantly opens your nose up to 38% more than cold medicine alone. so you can breathe ... and sleep. shut your mouth and say goodnight mouthbreathers. breathe right.

mom,on my car insurance of money by switching to geico. i should take a closer look at geico...

you know, geico can help you save money on your homeowners insurance too? great! geico can help insure our mountain chalet! how long have we been sawing this log? um, one hundred and fourteen years. man i thought my arm would be a lot more jacked by now. i'm not even sure this is real wood. there's no butter in this churn. do my tris look okay? take a closer look at geico. great savings. and a whole lot more. ♪ >> kimberly: it was one of the most memorable feuds of the presidential campaign. remember this? >> who is next? excuse me. sit down. you weren't called. sit down, sit down, sit down.

>> i have the right -- >> no, you don't. you haven't been called. go back to univision. >> kimberly: jorge ramos god himself ejected from that press conference. he is still not letting up on mr. trump now that he is president. signing actions to curb illegal immigration. he writes the united states gave me opportunities that mexico did not. decades after i arrived here, the anti-immigrant rhetoric to being turned into policy under donald trump has made me realize that i just don't recognize this country anymore. mr. trump recognizes the threat some illegal immigrants posed to america. today he asked a roomful of law enforcement officers for their help in getting them out. >> you have the power and knowledge to tell general kelly, now secretary kelly, who the illegal immigrant gang members are. you have that power.

you know them. you are there. you know the illegals. you know the bad ones, the good ones. i want you to turn in the bad ones. call secretary kelly's representative, and we'll get them out of our country and bring them back where they came from and we will do it fast. >> kimberly: dana, what do you make of the messaging? he is staying specifically let us know who the bad ones are, meaning the criminals, the gangs, criminal recidivists. >> dana: i think that's where everybody agrees, on the criminals that are here illegally should absolutely be on the priority list to be gone first and deported first and not allowed back in. none of this return five times and then eventually kill someone, like kate steinle. i don't think jorge ramos is speaking about that policy in particular. i think he's talking about the wall he says he opposed from the beginning.

also there's rumors about additional immigration deportation or curbs on others that are already here illegally that might not be criminals. i think that's what jorge ramos is talking about. >> kimberly: eric, what do you make of it? >> eric: the wall is not up. you can still go that way if you want. even when it's up, i think the wall allows people to leave. the wall keeps people from coming in but it allows people to leave. that is the beauty of america. i think we should be increasing legal immigration. we should make it easier to get citizenship status here but i think we let in a million a year, 980,000 a year. we should triple it. there by, everyone who says there are a lot of jobs that illegals are taking that may be americans won't take, that's probably true. that's very likely true. that alleviate some pressure of wealth, we need illegals to take the jobs. if you have two or three more

million people per year coming in, businesses will be happy in the economy will be happy and hopefully everyone except the hard-line immigration people we have. >> greg: i make a lot of things out of it. the left keeps warning everybody you shouldn't normalize trump. don't normalize trump, but what they are doing is they are trying to abnormalize normal behavior. if you are against terrorist blending in with migrants, that's abnormal. if you are for a stronger border, that's abnormal. the trick is we have -- we have histories losers telling us the right thing to do is somehow freakish, somehow abnormal. the whole point is to paint normal is weird because we have had eight years for progressive red radicalism the country. that to me is weird.

>> bob: a couple things strike me, greg, on your point heard i don't know a single liberal, not one, that i have talked to that doesn't agree with what dana said wanting to get people who commit crimes out. >> eric: what about sanctuary cities? >> bob: you are going back to wall street, those people. >> dana: occupy wall street. i speak bob. >> bob: trump saying to these cops, you know who the bad guys are. they probably do. they are probably trying to arrest them already. >> eric: they are not allowed to. in sanctuary cities, you can be a criminal and they are instructed by the mayors of the cities not to turn them over. the five that's the point. this guy came back in and out. he was a criminal, and recidivists.

five different offenses and he comes back and shoots and guns down kate steinle as she's walking with her father. >> eric: you turn them over and the city says no. >> bob: you are talking about one city. >> eric: no, i'm not. >> bob: the 3 million you talked about, that's what ronald reagan did. >> dana: it is a pretty conservative point of view. >> bob: the last time there was an immigration -- ronald reagan's bill passed in 1986 and it made a lot of sense and he said the same thing. let's bring them in. they will take jobs our people don't want to take and they will pay taxes. let's do it and let's stop fighting. that was ronald ronald reagan. made a lot of sense. >> kimberly: he said there are good and bad and i want you to tell us who the bad ones are so that we can get them out. he was careful to specify and delineate between the two.

okay, good idea. when "the five" returns, hillary clinton has reemerged with a controversial prediction about the future. don't miss this next. no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car plus depreciation. liberty mutual insurance.

why do so many businesses rely on the u.s. postal service? because when they ship with us, their business becomes our business. ♪ that's why we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country. ♪ here, there, everywhere. united states postal service priority : you

i use what's already inside me to reach my goals. so i liked when my doctor told me i may reach my blood sugar and a1c goals by activating what's within me with once-weekly trulicity. trulicity is not insulin. it helps activate my body to do what it's supposed to do release its own insulin. trulicity responds when my blood sugar rises. i take it once a week, and it works 24/7. it comes in an easy-to-use pen and i may even lose a little weight. trulicity is a once-weekly injectable prescription medicine

to improve blood sugar in adults with type 2 diabetes when used with diet and exercise. trulicity is not insulin. it should not be the first medicine to treat diabetes or for people with type 1 diabetes or diabetic ketoacidosis. do not take trulicity if you or a family member has had medullary thyroid cancer, if you've had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2, or if you are allergic to trulicity. stop trulicity and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms such as itching, rash, or trouble breathing; a lump or swelling in your neck; or severe pain in your stomach area. serious side effects may include pancreatitis, which can be fatal. taking trulicity with a sulfonylurea or insulin increases your risk for low blood sugar. common side effects include nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, decreased appetite and indigestion. some side effects can lead to dehydration, which may make existing kidney problems worse. with trulicity, i click to activate what's within me. if you want help improving your a1c and blood sugar numbers

with a non-insulin option click to activate your within. ask your doctor about once-weekly trulicity. ♪ >> greg: like bigfoot emerging from the brush, hillary clinton has released a taped message. i wonder if she says that despite all the challenges we face, she remains convinced that yes, the future is female. >> despite all the challenges we have faced, i remain convinced that yes, the future is female. >> greg: what does that even mean? will a meteor strike take out just the dudes? she said this at the maker's conference a storytelling platform for women's issues. i love stories. here's one. it's about a candidate and a party who relied on identity politics so much it forgot their

own country. it's about a candidate who got so obsessed over being a woman, she forgot she was human. everything became black, hispanic, female,, you name it. that woman and her party lost yet she can't let go. which reminds me of another story, that of a japanese officer who came out of hiding in 1974 in the philippines unaware that the japanese forces had surrendered 29 years before. he went back to japan but could not adapt to life back home so he ran off to brazil. the war was over. his side lost but he was unable to grasp a country that moved on from his old ideas. as the democratic party still clings to identity driven division, you can imagine the same destiny. they lost the war but still trudge the same old turf, clinging to a divisive weapons that backfired. i don't think brazil will take them.

you know what i love about this? she says the future is female. she's right because guys are in trouble. this is what i can't stand about identity politics. early life adversity, according to studies, hurts boys more. they get suspended more, they drop out of school, they do terrible in school. >> dana: they don't have an entire media complex devoted to their well-being and confidence. i'm a girl, obviously. when i was a kid, my dad bought me a t-shirt and it was a hideous teacher but i wore it. it said "anything boys can do, girls can do better." that fed into my ability to have confidence and make it in a man's world, whatever. now life is totally different. the future is actually a robot in terms of automation because that's where things are going. it's happening. they have big enough concern for laura bush when she was the first lady to start a program that was targeted just for boys

because they are needed to be some balancing out. i'm not the mother of a young boy. >> kimberly: i just so happen to be. >> greg: she can't let go. the world has moved on. >> kimberly: she is clinging to try to have some relevant still but i fdisservice to womeo young women looking for positive role models. you shouldn't wake up in the morning and look at yourself and say okay, i'm a woman and then just find yourself in those terms. that is self-limiting. you should say, who am i as an individual? what would like to do and accomplish? what are my goals and dreams and how my going to set about achieving them? that's how it is. people have fought very hard for equal rights in this country and for women to have them and we have them. start moving forward and don't wallow in this idea that you are not good enough if you're not born a man and that you are

automatically operating at a disadvantage. i don't see it that way. >> dana: it is saying that the system is rigged. >> greg: it is. speaking of wallowing, can i show you the ad. it is so dishonest. rolex. >> what do i tell my daughter? do i tell her that despite her education, or drive, her skills, her intelligence, she will automatically be valued as less than every man she ever meets? or maybe i will be able to tell her something different. >> greg: the white men who came up with that ad said all women are born victims. that's a great message. >> eric: i saw the ad and i felt the same way and i did a little research. i think audi is onto something.

a bunch of studies show that women comprise two-thirds of all car buying decisions. if you are a guy watching football, you are going, i can't believe they did that. apparently women who are the car buying decision makers say i like that. >> greg: do you think women like it? >> kimberly: i don't like it. >> eric: audi does pay women at an equal pay scale. women executives, less than men but they do pay. >> kimberly: their truth is that in fact women do do as well as men but they put forward a deceiving ad. to try to manipulate and sell cars. >> greg: it's a lie. all ads are lies. they have accused other companies of doing something wrong in saying we are rights. it's a myth. the gender gap is a myth. bob, i want to get you into this. do you want to talk about hillary?

do you want to talk about the ad? >> bob: probably the best one the super bowl had. i think eric is exactly right. there is a lot of marketing. >> greg: you are assuming women like that? no strong woman would like that ad? >> dana: is it supposed to appeal to your emotions? >> greg: so women are emotional and men aren't. >> dana: we didn't cover that on the show because we had so many other things but the day of the women's march, yes they believe that. you might not but there's a significant portion. >> bob: when you say identity politics, you list blacks or women. women are 52% of the country. >> greg: really? i had no idea. >> dana: and they are doing better in almost every measure. medical school, law school. >> greg: boys are doing worse

and worse. and you are saying that's good. >> kimberly: and a woman ran for president of the united states and if she wasn't such a bad candidate maybe she would have won. >> greg: i had, valentine's day is coming up and bob beckel may consider this woman -- may ask her to be his date. she dumped her husband of 22 years over his support for president trump. bob is in love. next. ♪ it's not just a car, it's your daily treat. ♪

go ahead, spoil yourself. the es and es hybrid. experience amazing.

♪ >> bob: lives in washington state, made a decision. she decided she was going to divorce her husband, bill. bill was stupid enough to vote for donald trump. eric, do you think there is something more here than just the vote? >> kimberly: hard-hitting news segment. >> eric: set you up on a date. >> eric: i am thankful i live in a household where we are both

pro-trump. worked out nicely. >> bob: separated, not divorce. takes a little while to get divorced. i've done it before. let's move right on. dana, what do you think? >> dana: i think it's sad when politics gets in the middle of a loving relationship that you have with the spouse you have committed your life to. that's unfortunate. >> kimberly: someone was looking to get out. >> greg: he was trying to get out because she was voting for hillary. they flipped it on him. you are right. political should never take precedence over the personal. >> kimberly: i think there's more to this story. i'm thinking somebody was trying to get out of this. >> bob: he was probably cheating on her. sorry, my 2 minutes is up. "one more thing" is up next.

...as a combination of see products.. and customers. every on-time arrival is backed by thousands of od employees, ...who make sure the millions of products we ship arrive without damages. because od employees treat customer service... ...like our most important delivery. od. helping the world keep promises.

withevery late night...g... and moment away... with every click...call...punch... and paycheck... you've earned your medicare. it was a deal that was made long ago, and aarp believes it should be honored. thankfully, president trump does too. "i am going to protect and save your social security and your medicare. you made a deal a long time ago." now, it's congress' turn.

tell them to protect medicare. by simply enjoying it. boost® simply complete. it's intelligent nutrition made with only 9 ingredients, plus 25 vitamins and minerals and 10 grams of protein. and look where life can take you! boost®. be up for it.™ ♪ >> eric: time for "one more thing" ." thanks to you all, my first book was a big "new york times" bestseller. i'm happy to announce i'm working on the second book which will be out later this year. president trump promise to drain the swamp.

i show historical examples of some of the creepiest creatures and activities in the d.c. swamp and how trump can drain it. available for preorder everywhere books are sold. maybe i can get dana to read it and recommended. >> dana: you know i'll read it. i'm the only one who reads all of them. i will read it and give a very nice review. >> kimberly: she reads everything. >> eric: there is so much material. examples of corruption. >> bob: i'm going to promote my book. will you shut up? let's move on. >> kimberly: time for a cuteness alert. the parents of a young baby noticed their little guy started crying every time he heard a clarinet playing. they decided to film the amazing reaction. watch. ♪

>> dana: oh, my gosh. >> kimberly: doesn't he kind of look like bob? you do that. when you pout, you jut out your lower lip like that. >> greg: hurting his ears, though. time for this. ♪ greg's fashion news. i know everything about fashion. get out of my way, kimberly. let's talk about michaela per win. she is an aspiring fashion designer. for her senior project, she designed this dress. do you know what's so incredible about it? it's made out of pages of my book. that's not cool. ripped out of my book. even if you don't like what i right, you can't stand my opinions, you can wear my dress.

excellent work. >> dana: >> dana: that's a lot f talent. i like it. >> eric: page 236, i tell you. >> kimberly: i want a guide to make something out of my book. pajamas. >> dana: you've heard -- i came up with that one. i did come up with this. podcast called "i'll tell you what." take a listen. how would you describe your podcast? we talk about what we ate. >> and death. a lot of death. >> a little elizabeth warren thrown in there. lounge wear. it's an eclectic. >> dana: we tape it every wednesday. you can subscribe on itunes. on sunday at 8:00 a.m., on

sirius xm channel 450, you're going to get to hear the podcast. i am worried because i don't think anybody at fox has listened to the podcast. sundays at 8:00 a.m. on your way to church. >> kimberly: racier than "the five"? >> bob: greg had 12 books while i was gone. he plugged each one of them. this is my book right here. it's called "i should be dead." i should be. my life and surviving politics, tv, and addiction. it's not a political book. it is more about addiction and finding faith that will bring you out of it. it was a long, difficult struggle. buy the book. >> dana: great cover. >> greg: get it at barnes & noble, amazon. >> bob: i didn't know these things. you know these things. >> dana: we could send you on

a book tour. >> kimberly: it has a great ending with bob back here at the table. >> eric: never missed an episode of "the five." stay tuned for "special report" coming up next. >> good evening prayer and welcome to washington. i am james rosen sitting in for bret baier. breaking tonight, president trump's pick to fill the vacancy on the supreme court apparently has a problem with some recent comments the president has made criticizinglr cases involving his immigration policy. this is americans across the country and citizens around the world wait with mounting tension for the appellate court decision expected as soon as tomorrow on president trump's executive order. the ruling will determine whether this order will remain suspended or go back into effect. either way, most observers predict this court battle is far from over with