>> hello. i am kimberly guilfoyle with bob beckel, dana perino, greg gutfeld. this is "the five" ." president trump started his day off swinging against anyone who came in his way, taking to twitter, the president lashed out on senator john mccain and richard blumenthal. here's the background. let's start with mccain. feuding over comments the arizona senator made over the military raid in yemen. he has said it's a disturbance for the white house to characterize it as a success because one of our navy seals lost his life. it prompted this response from

the president. "senator mccain should not be talking about a success or failure of a mission to the media. it only emboldens the enemy. he has been losing so long he doesn't know how to win anymore. look at them mess our country is. bogged down in confluence all over the place. our hero died on a winning mission, according to general mattis, not a failure. time for the u.s. to get smart and start winning again." this is the first thing, this battle. what do you make of it? >> eric: there is a lot going on this morning. a lot of twitter activity. i am finding it interesting that all day, if you watch cable news, switch channels, look all over the place, what you see is democrats outraged at donald trump for pushing back on senator richard blumenthal's assessment of the two words. the two words driving the cable news world crazy, how can he say this? how can donald trump pushback on

this? that wasn't fake new spray that was fake outrage. maybe blumenthal will vote in favor of gorsuch anyway. instead of focusing on the most important news of the day, donald trump tweeted and sean spicer followed up with some very, very interesting news for a lot of people that affects everyone. tax cuts are coming. massive new tax reform. instead, were going to worry about a couple words gorsuch may or may not have said. >> kimberly: let's listen to those exchanges back and forth. >> the comments were misrepresented braid what you should do is ask senator blumenthal about his vietnam record that didn't exist. ask senator bhumibol about his vietnam record. he represented that. just like he misrepresented

judge gorsuch. >> i am simply repeating what judge gorsuch said to me and i hope he will repeated an even stronger terms clearly, unequivocally, emphatically thing the president of the united states is absolutely wrong to be attacking the judiciary. >> kimberly: what do you make of the back-and-forth? >> dana: i see these things as separate. the comments against senator senator mccain, anytime there is a raid, you will have an after action report, the dod does, and there will be criticism. there will maybe even be some internal criticism. the president, for as long as we can remember going back, has received criticism from people on capitol hill or civilians who have no idea what is going on a national-securitywise. presidents have to not focus on it and focus on the mission and be able to move forward.

i would never have said that about senator mccain and i think yesterday katrina van hogle called john mccain an armchair warrior. we have a senator. you might disagree with him politically but i don't think anybody needs to discredit him and what he did in vietnam for our country, and i think one of the things donald trump might find is that as president one of the best things he can do instead of tweeting about it in the morning, if he wants the media to cover the story about the tax cuts, instead of tweeting about it, pick up the phone and call senator mccain. they will be able to get a lot of work done together. they are going to need all 52 votes and senator mccain is going to be one of them. they can be very effective. when it comes to gorsuch, there's two ways to look at it sprayed >> kimberly: i just saw some big breaking news that the ninth circuit court of appeals will announce its decision today.

>> dana: that we will not talk about tax cuts at all. every day you wake up in the white house and you think i want to drive a message. today it's tax cuts but you undercut yourself if you are tweeting about somebody's senate -- military record or tweeting about your supreme court nominee and making comments about another senator. the media will always cover their sugar and they don't want to eat their vegetables. if they he keeps giving them s, they will eat it. >> eric: i like vegetables. >> dana: i know you do. you are writing a book about vegetables. >> dana: you are ignoring the sugar. >> james: a jampacked share with vegetables. greg, what do you think? >> greg: i am confused about what this segment is about now. let's start over. stupid site to pick. is this a success or a failure? you are both on the same side.

you both want more of these raids. we gave obama a lot of crap for overselling the progress against isis, so we don't want president trump to oversell the progress. we want him to be realistic, but i think for now, raid now, evaluate later. it's not even the first inning. you've got to go out and kill a lot of these terrorists and it's a long game. it's a forever game, but the other thing about this and what i've learned to accommodate in my own brain is that this really is a long comedy central roast. there is no safe space in the trump administration. he doesn't pick the battles. he lets the battles for cam and then he goes after them. i have no doubt that he had mccain actually would probably get along if they would just -- but instead what you are watching -- >> kimberly: do you understand where they're coming from? the fact is that the mission was very successful because it was a

tremendous amount of intelligence gathered. they compared it to the intelligence grab and trove of information they got. that is true. >> eric: you have sean spicer saying you shouldn't comment on any effort if people die. >> greg: that i guess you can't comment on the iraq war. the candidate who won spent 18 months commentating on the iraq war. >> eric: mccain, if i'm not mistaken, lobbed the first shot in this war. everyone knows i'm not a big fan of john mccain. he's a war hero. i get it. i agree, but i don't like his politics. this whole, we need to investigate russia. i don't like his his pro-amnesty

stand. i don't like the fact that there's never been a war he hasn't ascribed to or voted for. i don't like it. cap and trade, he is pro-cap and trade. there's a lot of things i don't like about john mccain but the thing i don't like is he's a well respected senior senator who was pushing back on a lot of trump initiatives. this is not the time. i just gave you three reasons why i don't. cap and trade. >> kimberly: can everyone agree so i can get bob in? >> bob: welcome back to "the four." you don't want to pick a fight with someone like john mccain through twitter when you're going to need him on a lot of things. he's going to be helpful to you. he can be helpful -- he could be harmful if he wants to be. he's a tough guy. >> eric: he is going to screw his constituents just to get back at trump? >> bob: i have never seen a president of the united states

take on two sitting senators at one time and not just talk about that he disagrees with them. he says he's a loser. john mccain a loser when it comes to a the military? and blumenthal? there was a white house guy there with him and he confirmed it. trump is just flat out lying about it, number one, which is something he does automatically. talk about stepping on messages. if tax reform is going to happen, which i doubt, let's assume it does and he steps on the message today, he has a habit of stepping on messages everything a day. the good news gets buried under things like this. the guy should put that twitter away and learn but he can't because he still thinks he's the ceo of a company and he makes all the decisions. guess what, you don't. >> kimberly: he does. he's the president. >> eric: he is called the commander-in-chief so he's making the calls unless he gets pushed back by republican senators.

>> greg: we don't work for him. he's not our boss. he works for us. >> eric: as does mccain. >> bob: do you think it was okay for him to take him on like that? >> eric: there has been a war between donald trump and john mccain for a year and a half. he's not going to sit back and let john mccain undercut a lot of things he's trying to do. >> bob: all he did was get a bunch of senators to stand up. >> eric: no one is questioning john mccain's war service or his heroic -- >> kimberly: or service to the country as a senator. >> bob: donald trump said he was a loser. this is a guy that's going to lose anyway, trump. he takes on a guy like john mccain, calls him a loser, and then with blumenthal, he goes to his vietnam war record. >> eric: nothing would make me

happier than if john mccain decided to retire and we had a real conservative senator in arizona. >> kimberly: he's done a very good job for arizona and served the country very well. >> eric: i think trump is trying to close the border, not open the border. >> dana: what about the report today that donald trump is open to going forward with the gang of eight? >> eric: is he? >> dana: i saw that today. that was one of the vegetables i ate. i don't know if it's true. that's what they reported. looks like he might be open to it. which i think it's refreshing, and i don't think you have to be an ideologue and if it's good policy, let's go for it whether you're republican or democrat. far left or far right. >> eric: john mccain opposed the bush tax cuts. what more do you need? if you want to talk about swishy republicans, there it is. >> bob: your brand of

republican. donald trump would not have to be an authoritarian -- i won't use the word. if you have in congress going people are not like you. you are a small minority. u.n. donald trump and all this crap. people don't want walls. they don't want tax cuts for rich people. >> eric: do they? then they should have voted for that. they had that in hillary clinton. >> bob: you are apologizing for trump's mismanagement of his job. >> eric: i'm not apologizing for trump at all. i am saying john mccain and trump are having a fight and i said why. >> bob: do you think it was the right thing for trump to do? >> eric: we know it was coming. it's been going on for a year and a half. >> kimberly: apparently they are like, can you not hear me? and amazing food court is coming up. >> dana: we have been working on this since 645 this morning. >> greg: i don't think we are going to have time for it

anymore. >> kimberly: had, tim scott reveals some of the racist, despicable feedback he's been getting for supporting our new attorney general, jeff sessions. where is the outrage from democrats on that?

>> we have gotten word from the ninth circuit court of appeals that they will make a decision on president trump's travel ban by the end of business today. pacific coast time. they are three hours behind us. we will follow the development's and bring the ruling as soon as it comes. you don't want to miss that. former alabama senators jeff sessions was sworn in today as attorney general after a long and bitter confirmation battle. some of the attacks on sessions were vicious, especially toward senator tim scott from south carolina. he read some of his hate mail last night. listen to this. >> you are a disgrace to the black race. you are an uncle tom scott. how does a black man turn on his own? a black man who is a racist against black people. a big uncle tom piece of fertilizer. i left out all the ones that use the n word.

i felt like it would not be appropriate. the liberal left speaks and desires for all of us to be tolerant. do not want to be tolerant of anyone that disagrees with where they are coming from. >> dana: i admire him so much. he went on to say that i wish my friends who called themselves liberals would want tolerance for every american, including conservative americans. he is used to being called unhelpful to black america. >> greg: this is nothing new. if you stray from the left-wing plantation, a black freethinker will be vilified. nothing scares a left-winger more than a black conservative. that shakes the foundation of the whole identity coalition they got going. if the black coalition leaves, what happens to the rest? will they follow suit? the democratic party, the progressive party right now are

white social justice elitists. they are pampered, petulant, and pasty. >> kimberly: and not nice to dr. ben carson or cornel west. >> bob: this is twitter we are talking about. this is small stuff. there are some passionate people on this issue, including me, about sessions. i think it's not surprising he would get that. he didn't read probably the hundreds he got which were favorable. number one, number two i think my guy -- he is sitting there complaining about this. what does he expect in a high-voltage situation? jeff sessions. and also he says it represents the left. it does not represent the left. those people who sent >> kimberly: they are the one sending it. >> dana: i want to see if kimberly or eric thinks this represents the left. here is senator schumer about the sessions confirmation.

>> when jeff sessions was passed, it turned my stomach. he is probably a most certainly the most anti-immigrant senator. at civil rights, voting rights, he is probably one of the top three or four against sacred rights, civil rights, voting rights. he doesn't belong there. >> dana: it's pretty strong to say it turned to stomach. >> kimberly: his talking points turn my stomach. his looking down, not being a good communicator. here's the deal. i think this is bad politics. you like chuck schumer is behaving in a way that he has in the past and is now taking on this role politically because it's expedient. for him to say that about sessions, who is widely admired by his colleagues as someone who was a civil rights champion, it's really, to me, unbecoming that he's making these comments. >> bob: you said jeff sessions was a rights hero? >> kimberly: did i stutter?

>> bob: that's the most crazy thing i think i've ever heard. he also got voted down by the senate -- >> greg: more than al sharpton never did. >> bob: apples to oranges. >> dana: what do you make of the left? >> eric: "time" magazine cover this week is senator schumer standing right there in the type says do they matter anymore? the democrats. do the democrats matter anymore? they see that and they think we have to matter, right? the rhetoric is going to be more hyperbole. the rhetoric is going to be ratcheted up and they are going to make crazier and crazier comments. more provocative comments just so they can stay relevant and stand tv until they figure out what went wrong. the problem is they are wasting so much time coming up with hotlines like that, turns my stomach about sessions, instead of figuring out what went wrong. >> bob: are you kidding me? >> eric: cory booker stood up

and trashed senator sessions. >> bob: fine. >> eric: three weeks after he cosponsored a bill with senator sessions. >> kimberly: that is called hypocrisy. hypocrisy. they lack character and integrity to do that. >> bob: how about the right wing nuts who said these things about obama? >> kimberly: who? >> bob: called them everything except for a word. >> dana: they never said he turned their stomachs. marco rubio gave a speech about stability and commenting on the senate floor. it was very good and it's not even a reading assignment. it's a viewing assignment. i had, there's a big divide in america about president trump's travel ban but there seems to be a great deal of support for it over in europe. they have a very serious crisis

on their hands. greg has more on that next. (alarms) where's the car? it'll be here in three...uh, four minutes. are you kidding me? no, looks like he took a wrong turn. don't worry, this guy's got like a four-star rating, we're good. his name is randy. that's like one of the most trustworthy names! ordering a getaway car with an app? are you randy? that's me! awesome! surprising. what's not surprising? how much money erin saved by switching to geico. everybody comfortable with the air temp? i could go a little cooler. ok. fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more. why do so many businesses rely on the u.s. postal service? because when they ship with us, their business becomes our business. ♪ that's why we make more e-commerce deliveries to homes than anyone else in the country.

♪ here, there, everywhere. united states postal service priority : you bp gives its offshore teams 24/7 support from onshore experts, so we have extra sets of eyes on our wells every day. because safety is never being satisfied. and always working to be better. hei don't want one that's haded nevera big wrecksfied. just say, show me cars with no accidents reported find the cars you want, avoid the ones you don't plus you get a free carfax® report with every listing i like it start your used car search at carfax.com

dale! oh, hey, rob. what's with the minivan? it's not mine. i don't -- dale, honey, is your tummy still hurting, or are you feeling better to ride in the front seat? oh! is this one of your motorcycling friends? hey, chin up there, dale. lots of bikers also drive cars. in fact, you can save big if you bundle them both with progressive. i'd like that. great.

whoo. you've got soft hands. he uses my moisturizer. see you, dale. bye, rob. ♪ >> greg: according to a large pole in ten european countries, most support a halt in immigration from muslim countries. i guess islamic terror isn't simply the concern of trump voters but citizens of poland, germany, the u.k. crossing borders and political lines. i guess that makes them all deplorable. majority opinion doesn't make the opinion right. millions still prefer justin bieber over the rebounds. that's wrong. still, when massacres increase with rising levels of migration, liberal politicians must realize their role in this. when you call people bigoted for worrying about their own safety, you don't persuade.

you inflame. would it hurt to discuss small steps first like a temporary halt this and please check things out? that is common sense. common sense is seen as mean and safety is always trumped by sentiment. who suffers? believe it or not, the innocent migrants. migration is not a right but a compassionate act that those lucky enough to be born here should welcome, but by not admitting that the fusion of terror, technology, and infiltration has changed immigration forever, and then not prioritizing the safety of its citizens, our world leaders screwed the migrants over. their pc paralysis due to islamaphobia phobia prevented them from excepting that bad eggs exist. we must temporarily treat everything as rotten, a tragedy that flows from the top, not the bottom. is everybody in this poll a racist? >> kimberly: that was a word

salad teetering on the edge of being verbose. >> greg: verbose? i try to keep it at about 1:17. i figured that's when everybody stopped listening. >> kimberly: that's really interesting. can you back that up by science? >> eric: i listen all the way through. >> bob: i get the first 30 seconds. >> greg: after we make fun of my monologue, any thoughts? >> eric: it's a small pole. not too many people. 10,000. oh, there is a lot of people. austria and hungary, 64% agreed with the comment that there should be some sort of temporary ban or vetting from people from the certain countries. not religions, countries. as the trump temporary ban would be. france, nice, belgium. at 64%. >> greg: they've got problems. >> eric: if you don't listen to them, there's no reason to

have this discussion. people who have had open borders and are experiencing terrorism. >> bob: it's not a surprising pole. each one of these countries have suffered because they've never had an immigration policy that was as strict as we've had since 9/11, and they've allowed people to come in. if you've been to london and look at the muslim community around london or in paris, of course they are going to be for that. these people have suffered terribly because of their own mistakes. >> eric: that is what we are trying to stop from happening. >> dana: part of the problem is that the simulation is not continued with the muslim populations. the european governments have made it comfortable for them to not have to assimilate. now you see some measures where you are trying to take things away and say maybe you won't get your council house or you won't get these benefits are bring over additional family. now they are trying to do that and you are seeing the politics in europe changing with people challenging the status quo and

possibly winning elections. >> greg: these are basically people who are saying we wish we had the opportunity you have to fix this. we don't anymore. >> kimberly: what does that tell you? this is part of the larger context use with brexit and wanting to be able to be responsible in on your own decisions as it relates to the economy, national security. to touch on the comments by the pope, one of the most highly protected and secured places in the world is the vatican. >> eric: they've got a wall. >> kimberly: they have a wall plus. they have a whole situation. i don't think it's unreasonable. the pope has to understand we have an obligation to protect the citizens of the united states, people that come here, people that live here. that's the job and obligation of the president of the united states and it's one of the most serious. >> dana: you think the pope would support the suggestion of solving problems at the source. >> greg: of the pope was

criticizing trump but saying he wasn't. we should be building bridges, not walls. >> dana: don't tweet me. >> greg: he was basically targeting trump, don't you think? >> bob: putting up walls and all those countries? >> eric: you could enhance your vetting process from people trying to get in. >> bob: that is what we've been doing for a long time. we will never be like they are. >> eric: that is the thing you said was such a horrible idea. go back to george bush and the vetting process was very tough, very tough. we are not going to have -- allow immigrants to come in without any questions. we don't do that in this country and we're not going to do it. since 9/11, we are particularly not going to do it. >> greg: amazing how much tougher muslim countries are on other muslims. we are finally catching up to everybody else. >> kimberly: bob, you are speaking about the vetting

process in this country. what general kelly and others have said and we talked about this yesterday, is the countries they are objecting to our failed states that lack the adequate means to properly vent people there, too i sent to gait identity, -- authenticate identity. when you objected to saudi arabia and pakistan, they are on record, well-documented that they do engage in in proper vetting there. which is why they were not added to the list, even though they are muslim countries. >> dana: you might have to add venezuela. did you see that they are basically -- looks like they gave passports to terrorist organizations? ad venezuela to the list. >> kimberly: look at the state of the government there. >> eric: passports may have been stolen. >> greg: also canada! they are coming from canada! >> bob: carrying yemenis passports and getting into this country? >> kimberly: yemen is a hotbed

of terrorism, it's like the "star wars" bar scene for radical islamic jihadists. >> bob: i was in that bar scene. >> kimberly: the dash okay , >> greg: you can't do a call back to an early segment. fine. you can do whatever you want. meet our time cues. up next, am i on air? the trump administration is on fire for throwing a fit after real tailors like -- retailers like nordstrom's dropped ivanka trump's fashion line. i realize that ah, that $100k is not exactly a fortune.

well, a 103 yeah, 103. well, let me ask you guys. how long did it take you two to save that? a long time. then it's a fortune. well, i'm sure you talk to people all the time who think $100k is just pocket change. right now we're just talking to you. i told you we had a fortune. yes, you did. getting closer to your investment goals starts with a conversation. schedule a complimentary goal planning session today. what makesheart healthysalad the becalifornia walnuts.r? the best simple veggie dish ever? heart healthy california walnuts. the best simple dinner ever? heart healthy california walnuts.

great tasting, heart healthy california walnuts. so simple. get the recipes at walnuts.org. mattress firmness? enter sleep number... she likes the bed soft. he's more hardcore. you can both adjust the bed for the best sleep of your life. right now, save 50% on the ultimate limited edition bed. go to sleepnumber.com for a store near you. tech: don't let a cracked windshtrust safelite.plans. with safelite's exclusive "on my way text"... you'll know exactly when we'll be there. giving you more time for what matters most. (team sing) safelite repair, safelite replace.

♪ >> eric: you might have heard about the retailers who have been dropping ivanka trump's

products. "my daughter is a great person. always pushing me to do the great thing. terrible." kellyanne conway voiced her opinion. >> i find it ironic you have executives bragging about what they've done to her and her line and yet they are using the most prominent woman in donald trump donald trump's -- she's his daughter. he has been a champion for women empowerment, women in the workplace. i think people can see through it. go buy ivanka's stuff. >> eric: some accusing conway of crossing an ethical line. jason jay fitz said he wants the office of government ethics to review her comments. the white house said conway has been counseled on the subject of the president "absolutely continues to supporter despite

the outrage period" >> kimberly: that was an associated press newswire. she was asked the question about the situation specifically which she then addressed and answered and made sort of off-the-cuff comments to say listen, support her. now they've told her, okay, be careful in case this comes off the wrong way. it is construed improperly. that's certainly not what kellyanne conway meant or intended to do. she was simply answering questions that were posed to her. >> eric: on a scale of 1 to 10, how big is this? >> dana: not very big. he was expressing fatherly pride in his daughter. he is grateful to kellyanne conway for being aggressive in her defense. however, i do think the government should not be picking winners and losers. it's one thing to do it when you are not a government official but now it's present, i do think it's different. hands off. let the market decide. thing is, inadvertently, even

though she was answering the question, it takes -- takes away attention from the question of the day. >> greg: do you -- >> eric: do you think it was starkly tied to business or politics? >> greg: that's the problem. i go with peter schweizer who said this is a problem. when you are trying to boost business for a family member, that's gross and may be trump should divest and that's the problem you get. we spent a whole year going off on the clinton foundation about using an office for money. we were yelling about it appeared we're kind of being hypocrites here if we don't do this. >> kimberly: what are you mad at? >> greg: i'm not mad. honestly, i don't give. anyway, my point is this. what is nordstrom's supposed to do if their business decisions are predicated on the fear of

angering a dad president? no business, again, he works for nordstrom's. nordstrom doesn't work for trump. fox news doesn't work for trump. everybody must be reminded of that. >> eric: bob, your thoughts on the pulling of the brand or kellyanne conway getting backlash? >> bob: she was asked the question and she answered. she didn't answer the way she should have but she answered and i think it was all right. as far as nordstrom's is concerned, the implication here is that it's all political. when in fact nordstrom can't sell the stuff so they dropped 15,000. 15,000 different products every year that don't sell in her stuff is not selling. maybe because her name is trump and it's not -- i don't know. it was a business decision clearly. if it was selling a lot of stuff, they would keep her name on ice. >> greg: they did drop my onesies because they claimed

they were not selling. >> dana: nobody can fit in them. even small boys were like, whil. >> greg: they have everything in the return policy is incredible. >> kimberly: gave bring it bacx months later. >> kimberly: promoting nordstrom's like that. >> greg: i went to the mall and stanford. >> eric: the reason he is calling nordstrom hypocrites is that the one in new york was using the ivanka brand as hard as their flagship. can't confirm that. it's from geraldo. there he is. coming up, matt drudge isn't happy with the republican party and bob is loving it. here bob pay tribute to matt drudge next.

your insurance company won't replace the full value of your totaled new car. the guy says, "you picked the wrong insurance plan." no, i picked the wrong insurance company. with new car replacement™, we'll replace the full value of your car plus depreciation. liberty mutual insurance. ♪ some things are simply impossible to ignore. the strikingly designed lexus nx turbo and hybrid. the suv that dares to go beyond utility. experience amazing.

don't put off checking out your medicare options until 65. now is a good time to get the ball rolling. medicare only covers about eighty percent of part b medical costs. the rest is up to you.

that's where aarp medicare supplement insurance plans insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company come in. like all standardized medicare supplement insurance plans, they could help save you in out-of-pocket medical costs. taking informed steps really makes a difference later. that's what it means to go long™. call now and request this free decision guide and explore the range of aarp medicare supplement plans. all plans like these let you choose any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. these are the only medicare supplement insurance plans endorsed by aarp. call now and request your free decision guide... and start gathering the information you need to help you go long™.

♪ >> bob: usually matt drudge and i don't see i type.

there's a first time for everything. the conservative founder of "the drudge report" has been tearing apart republicans on twitter for not delivering on promises made during the campaign. "the republican party should be sued for fraud. no discussion of tax costs, just lots of back to basic." let me say this, the tax cut thing, they have talked about it. we'll see what they produce. drudge is saying something that i think is right. the white house is not doing much of anything. >> kimberly: o. >> dana: i think he's complaining about. you are talking about congress. >> eric: you are pointing the finger in the wrong direction. down the road. the russell rotunda. >> kimberly: your geo locator is a little bit off. >> eric: the republicans that are being obstructionist. >> bob: he said on the

campaign trail, g.o.p. >> kimberly: do you want to pick a different topic? >> bob: not at all. >> kimberly: do you want a mulligan? >> bob: i could cite ivanka trump's shoes are made in china. you don't think he's referring to trump? >> eric: no, he wasn't. >> dana: even this morning after they rant, donald trump was the one, president trump was the one who said big tax cuts are coming. i think he was maybe getting a little cover to his republican colleagues. >> greg: matt drudge pulls the strings. >> kimberly: bob, the producers said they didn't tell you. >> bob: they told me what? >> kimberly: that it was the g.o.p. >> bob: the producers told me that? i think it's wrong. >> kimberly: in another episode of "where is my frontal lobe?" >> bob: i read that thing.

>> kimberly: bob's research! from 2011. human resources. >> bob: stop it. i won't say anything. let's go back to ivanka's shoes. when you say, the promises you make on the campaign trail, he's gonna be talking about trump. >> greg: ivanka's shoes -- everyone loves her shoes but they are made in china. >> kimberly: okay. but her shoes are great. the dresses. i bought one. >> bob: are you saying the chinese make better shoes than we do? >> kimberly: i didn't say that that. >> greg: i wear wooden shoes. >> dana: there is an indication from some people who

want the republicans to move forward quickly on the legislative package they are promised. tax cuts, obamacare, and the infrastructure bill. you have to figure out how to sequence them and how you're going to pay for them and i think on the taxing, it's explaining the border adjustment tax is really difficult. the corporate tax, you could probably figure out how to do that pretty easily but i'm intrigued by what president trump said this morning there's a big tax cut coming. that's not for corporations. i'm expecting that to be something big and bold for people in the heartland in the middle class who voted for him. >> kimberly: hang in there, lisa simpson. >> greg: >> bob: he also said nk we are going to have a fix for obamacare. that was two weeks ago. the point here is if you don't think this refers -- if this refers to the republican party, this is the hand of the republican party. >> dana: at some point, i think you will be right that there will be a connection. today i think what the complaint

is this about house and senate republicans, some people on the right think they've not done enough. that they should have been able to have an obamacare repealed bill on the desk. >> bob: why is everybody always picking on me? "one more thing" is up next.

♪

>> kimberly: hi. it's time for "one more thing." kimberly, you are up first. let me tell you something, little one with the fancy onesies. you want a piece of this, don't you? don't you? this is national pizza day. apparently they'd apartment of agriculture is spending money doing studies on pizza and they have come to the conclusion that yeah, people eat it. [laughter] 15% of men, 11% of women. >> dana: that's all? >> kimberly: pepperoni? >> dana: only 15% of men? >> kimberly: one in eight americans consume pizza on any given day. a higher percentage of males. 15%.

11%, you and me, lisa simpson. children obviously eat a lot of pizza. you probably shouldn't also talk and eat pizza with your mouth open. i apologize. >> dana: it's charming. >> kimberly: it's delicious. thank you, little italy. we paid for it. don't worry. >> bob: for those of you who watch the super bowl, lady gaga had a terrific performance. if you remember the beginning of the performance, she talked about -- i'm sorry. my earpiece is falling out. she sang a song "this land is your land," a woody guthrie song written decades ago. and it was in fact an anti-american song. a lot of you probably thought this was something that was terrific and pro-american. you know what? it's a communist song. >> dana: i used to sing that in elementary school all the time. that was the indoctrination. >> greg: it is my land, not your land.

>> eric: she is a communist. >> bob: you know, she has. >> greg: i love it. he's admitting it. >> kimberly: did you know the top for pizzeria chains. pizza hut, domino's, little caesars, papa john's. go. >> bob: who is up? >> greg: greg's celebrity corner. on the slopes of aspen, we've got tape of schumer skiing. sliding down their paid he's got an amazing coat of hair, doesn't he? it allows him to slide down on his belly. they are telling me to go on. >> eric: i will blow through this quickly. 1854, the republican party was formed entirely against opposing slavery. democrats were called

dixiecrat's, southern democrats, they protected slavery in all territories. that was their plan. the kkk was founded by southern democrats. general nathan bedford forrest. he spoke at the 1868 democratic convention. and this one, republicans, republicans passed the 13th, 14th, 15th amendments. 13th abolished slavery. 14th offered citizenship to all races. and the 15th gave voting rights to all races. >> bob: that's a good history lesson. voting rights in the housing act was more democrats and republicans. >> dana: valentine's day just around the corner. i'm sure everybody's getting ready. you might want to buy a greg onesie. valentine's day is for zoo animals too. they figured out a way to get hurt have been and shaved --

heart-shaped pinyon is. penguins mate for life. it's a good valentine's day story >> kimberly: set your dvr so you never miss an episode of "the five." "special report" is next. >> this is a fox news alert. i am chris wallace infrared fire. we are awaiting word from the ninth circuit court of appeals on its decision about president trump's immigration executive order. the order temporary limits travel from seven largely muslim countries and suspends all refugees from coming to the u.s. has been blocked by a federal judge. now we are told a ruling from a 3-judge panel reviewing the court order is coming down shortly, perhaps in this hour. chief white house correspondent john roberts begins coverage tonight. >> when we get the ruling, and it could be anytime between now and probably 8:00 eastern time, it's expected to be a very narrow ruling.